Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (161)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = drug induced liver injury (DILI)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 3084 KB  
Article
Widely Targeted Liver Metabolomics Reveals Potential Biomarkers in Mice with Drug-Induced Liver Injury
by Jiangning Peng, Tingting Zhao, Xuehong Zhang, Hong Wang, Hui Li and Yan Liang
Metabolites 2026, 16(2), 96; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16020096 - 28 Jan 2026
Viewed by 136
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), a major type of adverse drug reaction, has become one of the leading causes of acute liver injury and liver failure worldwide. Its clinical significance lies not only in acute hepatocyte necrosis and functional failure but also in [...] Read more.
Background: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), a major type of adverse drug reaction, has become one of the leading causes of acute liver injury and liver failure worldwide. Its clinical significance lies not only in acute hepatocyte necrosis and functional failure but also in its role as a key initiating factor for liver cancer progression. Therefore, early diagnosis of DILI is of great importance. Methods: This study employed ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) to perform widely targeted metabolomics analysis on acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury mice and healthy mice. Results: UPLC-QTRAP-MS/MS identified 41 differentially expressed metabolites primarily involved in glycerophospholipid metabolism, arginine and proline metabolism, primary bile acid biosynthesis, and glutathione metabolism pathways. The significant elevation of serum and hepatic alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) confirmed the successful establishment of the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) model. ROC curve analysis indicated 11 metabolites with AUC values exceeding 0.90 as potential biomarkers, including (R)-2-Hydroxybutyric acid, Glu-Gln, γ-Glu-Gln, 2-Methyllactic acid, L-Serine, Hyodeoxycholic acid, 3-Epideoxycholic acid, and Glycochenodeoxycholic acid 7-sulfate. Conclusions: We propose that these differential metabolites may serve as candidate biomarkers for DILI. Our findings provide a novel metabolomic signature derived directly from the injured tissue and offer a theoretical foundation for further research into early diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Endocrinology and Clinical Metabolic Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 291 KB  
Review
Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Signatures and Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury
by Alexia Onaciu, Alina Grama, Ștefan Agoșton, Alexandra Mititelu, Bianca Mariş, Horia Ştefănescu and Tudor Lucian Pop
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(1), 482; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010482 - 2 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 505
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains one of the most challenging adverse drug reactions in clinical practice, particularly in its idiosyncratic form, which is not dose-dependent and is largely driven by host-specific immune and genetic factors. Recent genomic studies have revealed strong associations between [...] Read more.
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains one of the most challenging adverse drug reactions in clinical practice, particularly in its idiosyncratic form, which is not dose-dependent and is largely driven by host-specific immune and genetic factors. Recent genomic studies have revealed strong associations between certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and susceptibility to DILI, supporting an immunogenetic mechanism in which drug or metabolite–protein adducts act as neoantigens, triggering aberrant T-cell activation and hepatocellular injury. This review summarizes current evidence on the contribution of HLA polymorphisms to the pathogenesis of idiosyncratic DILI, highlighting allele-specific risk patterns, such as HLA-B*57:01 associated with flucloxacillin, HLA-DRB1*15:01–DQB1*06:02 in amoxicillin–clavulanate, and HLA-B*35:02 in minocycline-induced liver injury. Furthermore, ethnic variability and allele-haplotype interactions are discussed as potential modulators of susceptibility and clinical phenotype. By integrating genetic and immunological insights, the identification of HLA signatures offers promising tools for precision medicine, enabling earlier identification of at-risk individuals and improved prevention of severe hepatotoxic reactions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Immunology)
14 pages, 650 KB  
Review
Plasmapheresis for Suspected Drug-Induced Liver Injury During Pregnancy: A Multidisciplinary Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge
by Agnieszka Zakrzewska, Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska, Dariusz Grzegorz Wydra, Natalia Katarzyna Mazur-Ejankowska, Krystian Adrych, Leszek Tylicki, Alicja Dębska-Ślizień and Bogdan Biedunkiewicz
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(23), 8385; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238385 - 26 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 762
Abstract
Acute liver injury during pregnancy is rare and predominantly associated with pregnancy-related conditions including acute fatty liver of pregnancy; Hemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes and Low Platelets syndrome; intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; and preeclampsia. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a less common and often [...] Read more.
Acute liver injury during pregnancy is rare and predominantly associated with pregnancy-related conditions including acute fatty liver of pregnancy; Hemolysis, Elevated Liver Enzymes and Low Platelets syndrome; intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; and preeclampsia. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a less common and often overlooked cause of acute liver injury in pregnant patients. A literature search on acute liver injury during pregnancy and therapeutic plasma exchange was conducted, revealing the most common causative factors and syndromes. A 39-year-old woman was diagnosed with acute liver injury in the 23rd week of her third pregnancy and, upon extensive differential diagnoses, a suspicion of DILI occurred after the use of methyldopa. Methyldopa, the drug of choice for the treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, has a high safety profile for the developing fetus and is well tolerated by pregnant women, yet, in susceptible individuals, a hepatotoxic effect may occur. The drug was discontinued and symptomatic treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and prednisone was implemented with marginal effect. Upon a multidisciplinary joint consultation, plasmapheresis procedures were introduced, granting a significant improvement in the patient’s liver function and enabling the continuation of the pregnancy. Plasmapheresis treatment was safely and effectively used for the first time in the therapeutic process in a pregnant patient with DILI. Interdisciplinary cooperation of specialists with gastroenterology, nephrology, and obstetrics expertise is crucial to achieving a timely diagnosis and begin effective treatment for pregnant patients with acute liver injury. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1174 KB  
Article
Analysis of the Toxicological Profile of Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. Metabolites Using In Silico Methods
by Anna E. Rassabina and Maxim V. Fedorov
Plants 2025, 14(21), 3253; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14213253 - 24 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 828
Abstract
The invasive plant Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. is a valuable source of a number of bioactive metabolites that can be used in the pharmaceutical industry and medicine and may have some other applications as well. Today, there is a need to summarize data on [...] Read more.
The invasive plant Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. is a valuable source of a number of bioactive metabolites that can be used in the pharmaceutical industry and medicine and may have some other applications as well. Today, there is a need to summarize data on these substances as well as analyze the toxicological profile of the metabolites of H. sosnowskyi. In this study, we collected a dataset of 225 metabolites of H. sosnowskyi from different literature sources and performed cluster analysis of their chemical structures; we revealed five main clusters of compounds: terpenoids, aromatic compounds, polyaromatic compounds, fatty acids, and furanocoumarins. In order to fill the gaps in the experimental data on the toxicity of the studied substances, we used machine learning (ML) algorithms previously designed for high-accuracy prediction of toxicity end-points. The ML-based approach allowed us to fill in up to 90% of the missing median lethal dose LD50 (mouse) data for the studied molecules. The validity of each predicted value was confirmed by analyzing the applicability domain of the used ML models. For the calculations and ML modeling, we used the Syntelly chemoinformatics platform. For the most toxic compounds—hydroxycoumarins and furanocoumarins of H. sosnowskyi—the values for hepatotoxicity, drug-induced liver injury (DILI), cardiotoxicity, and carcinogenicity were predicted. Based on the analysis of LD50 values for the mouse animal model, the greatest toxicity for furanocoumarins is expected with the intravenous route of administration (62–450 mg/kg), which can cause drug-induced liver injury. At the same time, the data do not show high cardiotoxicity risks for the studied furanocoumarins. Based on the presented results, we discuss prospects of using some of the compounds as pharmaceutical agents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phytochemistry and Pharmacological Properties of Medicinal Plants)
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 3823 KB  
Review
The Protective Effect of Phenolic Acids on Liver Disease: A Review of Possible Mechanisms
by Xinyi Ma, Suhui Xiong, Feng Xiang, Yamei Li, Yan Lin, Yuexin Liu, Limei Lin and Jingchen Xie
Antioxidants 2025, 14(10), 1247; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14101247 - 17 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1972
Abstract
(1) Background: This article reviews the biological characteristics of phenolic acid compounds, focusing on their mechanisms of action in various liver diseases. (2) Methods: The review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We utilized PubMed and [...] Read more.
(1) Background: This article reviews the biological characteristics of phenolic acid compounds, focusing on their mechanisms of action in various liver diseases. (2) Methods: The review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We utilized PubMed and Web of Science databases to search for relevant studies on the use of phenolic acids in liver diseases from 2015 to 2025. (3) Results: Phenolic acids can improve different types of liver diseases, including drug-induced liver injury (DILI), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, liver fibrosis, and liver cancer. Their beneficial effects are attributed to mechanisms such as anti-inflammatory properties, antioxidant activity, regulation of lipid metabolism, inhibition of cell apoptosis, and modulation of gut microbiota. (4) Conclusion: Phenolic acids exhibit a good protective effect against various liver diseases and are associated with multiple signaling pathways. However, the primary target cells and specific molecular targets of phenolic acids remain unclear, necessitating further research to elucidate their protective mechanisms in liver diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Health Outcomes of Antioxidants and Oxidative Stress)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

28 pages, 2544 KB  
Review
COVID-19 Infection, Drugs, and Liver Injury
by Dianya Qiu, Weihua Cao, Yaqin Zhang, Hongxiao Hao, Xin Wei, Linmei Yao, Shuojie Wang, Zixuan Gao, Yao Xie and Minghui Li
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(20), 7228; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207228 - 14 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1713
Abstract
Novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is highly infectious and pathogenic. Novel coronavirus infection can not only cause respiratory diseases but also lead to multiple organ damage through direct or indirect mechanisms, in which the liver is one of the most frequently affected organs. It has [...] Read more.
Novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is highly infectious and pathogenic. Novel coronavirus infection can not only cause respiratory diseases but also lead to multiple organ damage through direct or indirect mechanisms, in which the liver is one of the most frequently affected organs. It has been reported that 15–65% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients experience liver dysfunction, mainly manifested as mild to moderate elevation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Severe patients may progress to liver failure, develop hepatic encephalopathy, or have poor coagulation function. The mechanisms underlying this type of liver injury are complex. Pathways—including direct viral infection (via ACE2 receptors), immune-mediated responses (e.g., cytokine storm), ischemic/hypoxic liver damage, thrombosis, oxidative stress, neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis), and the gut–liver axis—remain largely speculative and lack robust clinical causal evidence. In contrast, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has been established as a well-defined causative factor using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM). Treatment should simultaneously consider antiviral therapy and liver protection therapy. This article systematically reviewed the mechanism, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and management strategies of COVID-19-related liver injury and discussed the limitations of current research and the future directions, hoping to provide help for the diagnosis and treatment of such patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 565 KB  
Review
Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis by Varenicline and Infliximab as a Continuous Disease Spectrum with Two Different Flares: Acute Liver Injury Followed by Hepatic Autoimmunity
by Rolf Teschke
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(19), 9574; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199574 - 30 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1447
Abstract
Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a rare and complex disorder caused by drugs that are commonly metabolized by hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) pathways. Whereas DIAIH presents generally with a single clinical flare, in rare cases its clinical course shows two different, consecutively [...] Read more.
Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a rare and complex disorder caused by drugs that are commonly metabolized by hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) pathways. Whereas DIAIH presents generally with a single clinical flare, in rare cases its clinical course shows two different, consecutively emerging flares. The aim of this report was to analyze details of this rare but interesting phenomenon and to help improve appropriate causality evaluation in patients with suspected iDILI or DIAIH to provide better insight into the pathomechanistic steps leading the diseases. A clinical course with two flares was found in a DIAIH patient treated with varenicline, a smoking cessation drug, and in another patient experiencing DIAIH following intravenous application of infliximab used to treat ankylosing spondylitis. In both patients, the first flare was determined as a typical liver injury with increased serum activities of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and normal titers of serum autoimmune parameters, classified as an acute liver injury analogous to idiosyncratic DILI (iDILI), with verified causality using a modified version of RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method). After an interval of around two months from the cessation of varenicline use, the second flare emerged, as evidenced by increased serum ALT values now associated with newly increased serum autoimmune titers of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), classifying this flare as hepatic autoimmune injury with verified causality for varenicline using the simplified autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) score. A similar clinical DIAIH course of a continuous disease with two flares was described for the second patient, who received infliximab and experienced an interval of one month between the first and second flare. Interestingly to note, neither varenicline nor infliximab is degraded via a CYP pathway, and the metabolic disposition of both drugs is low. In sum, DIAIH can develop with two consecutive flares caused by two drugs not metabolized by CYPs and with slow drug disposition, raising the question of whether this phenomenon of two flares can occur in additional cases of DIAIH due to other drugs metabolized by CYPs or non-CYPs, a question to be resolved by DILI experts in future cases of iDILI and DIAIH. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 621 KB  
Article
Assessing the Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Liver Outcomes in Methotrexate Users: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Yassine Kilani, Daniel Alejandro Gonzalez Mosquera, Kaila Fennell and Kamran Qureshi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(19), 6799; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196799 - 26 Sep 2025
Viewed by 922
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is associated with hepatotoxicity, but distinguishing MTX-induced liver injury from hepatic dysfunction due to metabolic syndrome (MetS) is challenging. This study investigates the incidence of hepatic outcomes in long-term MTX users with and without MetS and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is associated with hepatotoxicity, but distinguishing MTX-induced liver injury from hepatic dysfunction due to metabolic syndrome (MetS) is challenging. This study investigates the incidence of hepatic outcomes in long-term MTX users with and without MetS and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) using real-world data. Methods: This cohort study used the TriNetX research network to identify U.S. adults (≥18 years) on MTX, excluding those with pre-existing liver injury. Patients were grouped by MetS status (MTX-MetS vs. controls) and further sub-stratified based on MASLD status. Propensity score matching (1:1) was adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and treatment. The primary outcomes included hepatic-enzyme elevations, hyperbilirubinemia, prolonged INR, and clinically significant drug-induced liver injury (DILI) at 3-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up. Results: Among 324,219 MTX users, 59,733 MTX-MetS patients were propensity matched with 59,733 controls. MTX-MetS patients demonstrated increased 10-year odds of hepatic-enzyme elevations (aOR = 1.41; 95%CI: 1.38–1.46), hyperbilirubinemia (aOR = 1.40; 95%CI: 1.32–1.49), prolonged INR (aOR = 1.58; 95%CI: 1.49–1.67), clinically significant DILI (aOR = 1.49; 95%CI: 1.41–1.57), and liver cirrhosis (aOR = 1.48; 95%CI: 1.35–1.63) compared to the controls. Patients with and without MASLD showed similar hepatic-enzyme, bilirubin, and INR elevations, with higher odds of DILI with MASLD (aOR = 1.56; 95%CI: 1.28–1.89). Conclusions: This study highlights the increased liver injury risk in MTX users with MetS and MASLD. Further studies are needed to distinguish the effects of MTX and metabolic dysfunction on liver outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 2784 KB  
Review
Obeticholic Acid and Other Farnesoid-X-Receptor (FXR) Agonists in the Treatment of Liver Disorders
by Stefano Fiorucci, Ginevra Urbani, Eleonora Distrutti and Michele Biagioli
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(9), 1424; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18091424 - 22 Sep 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5583
Abstract
The Farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) is a bile sensor involved in the regulation of bile acid homeostasis, fibrosis, inflammation, and metabolism. Obeticholic acid (OCA), a semisynthetic derivative of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), initially named 6-ethyl-CDCA or INT-747, is the first in a class of FXR ligands [...] Read more.
The Farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) is a bile sensor involved in the regulation of bile acid homeostasis, fibrosis, inflammation, and metabolism. Obeticholic acid (OCA), a semisynthetic derivative of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), initially named 6-ethyl-CDCA or INT-747, is the first in a class of FXR ligands that have been approved for clinical use for the treatment of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who are unresponsive or intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid. In this narrative review, we will examine the current status and future perspective of clinical use of OCA. Based on results from phase 2 and 3 clinical trials, OCA received a conditional market approval for its use as a second-line treatment for the management of PBC in 2016. However, concerns over drug (OCA)-induced liver injury (DILI), including hepatic decompensation in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic PBC patients, have led to discontinuation of OCA commercialization in the EU, but not in North America and the UK, in 2024. Based on positive results from preclinical models, OCA has been investigated also for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Results from phase 2 and 3 trials, however, have shown that while OCA reduces liver fibrosis, the beneficial effects on steatosis are marginal, thus preventing its clinical approval under the current regulatory guidelines. Here, we review potential applications of OCA in PBC patients in the context of a highly competitive therapeutic landscape, generated by the approval for clinical use of safer and effective second-line therapies, including PPARs agonists such as elafibranor and seladelapar and increased off-label use of fibrates. The current status of development of second-generation FXR agonists such as cilofexor, tropifexor, and vonafexor and their potential in the treatment of liver fibrosis in MASH will be discussed and compared to recently approved therapies, resmetirom, and semaglutide, a GLP-1 agonist. Finally, since some of the novel candidates for treating MASH, have shown limited efficacy on liver fibrosis, we suggest that development of combinatorial therapies based on FXR ligands and agents acting on different molecular targets might offer the opportunity for the repositioning of drug candidates whose development has been abandoned for insufficient efficacy, minimizing/recovering costs linked to drug development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pharmacotherapy of Liver Fibrosis and Hepatitis: Recent Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 24576 KB  
Article
Gallic Acid Alleviates Acetaminophen-Induced Acute Liver Injury by Regulating Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Signaling Proteins
by Jing Zhao, Yuan Zhao, Shuzhe Song, Sai Zhang, Guodong Yang, Yan Qiu and Weishun Tian
Antioxidants 2025, 14(7), 860; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14070860 - 14 Jul 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1656
Abstract
Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a major cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) globally, which necessitates effective therapies. Gallic acid (GA), a naturally abundant polyphenol, possesses potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that may overcome the limitations of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), such as its narrow therapeutic [...] Read more.
Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a major cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) globally, which necessitates effective therapies. Gallic acid (GA), a naturally abundant polyphenol, possesses potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that may overcome the limitations of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), such as its narrow therapeutic window. This study systematically investigated the hepatoprotective effects and underlying molecular mechanisms of GA against APAP-induced acute liver injury (ALI). Mice received an intraperitoneal injection of APAP (300 mg/kg), followed by an oral administration of GA (50 or 100 mg/kg) or NAC (150 mg/kg) 1 h post-intoxication. Both GA and NAC significantly ameliorated hypertrophy and histopathological damage, as evidenced by reduced serum ALT/AST levels and inflammatory cytokines. TUNEL staining revealed a marked suppression of apoptotic and necrotic cell death, further supported by the downregulation of pro-apoptotic Bax and the upregulation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 mRNA expression. GA and NAC treatment restored hepatic glutathione (GSH) content, enhanced antioxidant enzyme gene expression, and reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation. Mechanistically, GA and NAC inhibited MAPK phosphorylation while activating AMPK signaling. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that GA mitigates APAP-induced ALI by modulating oxidative stress and inflammation through the regulation of MAPK/AMPK signaling proteins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Natural and Synthetic Antioxidants)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 823 KB  
Article
The Effect of Prophylactic Hepatoprotective Therapy on Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on Propensity Score Matching
by Zhe Liu, Dongliang Yuan, Jun Chang, Lei Shi, Jingmeng Li, Mei Zhao and Qi Yang
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(7), 393; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32070393 - 9 Jul 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2118
Abstract
This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic hepatoprotective therapy in decreasing the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) among patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The analysis was performed on patients with cervical cancer who received chemotherapy at a tertiary [...] Read more.
This retrospective study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prophylactic hepatoprotective therapy in decreasing the incidence of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) among patients with cervical cancer undergoing chemotherapy. The analysis was performed on patients with cervical cancer who received chemotherapy at a tertiary hospital between September 2019 and August 2020. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to equilibrate baseline characteristics between the treatment group, which received prophylactic hepatoprotective drugs, and the control group, which did not receive prophylaxis. The incidence and severity of liver injury were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Out of the 609 patients initially screened, 299 were included following PSM, with 105 in the treatment group and 194 in the control group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of liver injury (21.90% vs. 18.04%, p = 0.420) or its severity (p = 0.348) observed between the groups. Furthermore, none of the subgroups exhibited a significant reduction in DILI risk with prophylaxis. However, the number of patients experiencing an increase in their grade of liver injury was significantly higher in the treatment group (18.10% vs. 13.40%, p = 0.002), with these patients also exhibiting increased levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and direct bilirubin (DBIL) post-chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Hepatoprotective drugs are not associated with a reduced risk of DILI and may in fact increase risk. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 536 KB  
Review
Autoimmune Hepatitis and Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Japan
by Hiroki Nishikawa, Soo Ki Kim and Akira Asai
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4514; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134514 - 25 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2650
Abstract
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is the most common liver disease caused by autoimmunity. In Japan, the number of patients with AIH has been increasing in recent years. AIH develops as a result of the loss of immune tolerance to autoantigens in the liver. Drug-induced [...] Read more.
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is the most common liver disease caused by autoimmunity. In Japan, the number of patients with AIH has been increasing in recent years. AIH develops as a result of the loss of immune tolerance to autoantigens in the liver. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an extremely important cause of liver injury in clinical practice and should always be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis. Recently, DILI caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors has been attracting attention. For the diagnosis of DILI, it is important to carefully exclude other possible causes of liver injury and obtain a detailed history of medications and the timing of their use. On the other hand, drug-induced AIH, like hepatitis, also exists and is clinically important because it is often difficult to differentiate from idiopathic AIH. A solid understanding of the pathogenesis of both AIH and DILI is essential for clinicians. This article provides an overview of AIH and DILI in Japan, including the latest findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 339 KB  
Review
Drug-Induced Autoimmune Hepatitis: Robust Causality Assessment Using Two Different Validated and Scoring Diagnostic Algorithms
by Rolf Teschke, Axel Eickhoff and Gaby Danan
Diagnostics 2025, 15(13), 1588; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131588 - 23 Jun 2025
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2168
Abstract
Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a relatively new subtype of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI), but the features of DIAIH have been variably described due to the inhomogeneity of assessed study cohorts. The aim of this analysis is to harmonize DIAIH cohorts by [...] Read more.
Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DIAIH) is a relatively new subtype of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI), but the features of DIAIH have been variably described due to the inhomogeneity of assessed study cohorts. The aim of this analysis is to harmonize DIAIH cohorts by unifying causality assessments, which may help characterize the features of DIAIH. Methods: Published reports of DIAIH cases were evaluated for the causality assessment methods used to verify the diagnosis of DIAIH. This disorder consists of two parts, i.e., the iDILI part and the autoimmune (AIH) part, whereby each part needs a specific diagnostic algorithm. The validated and scoring Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment (RUCAM) is privileged for assessing the iDILI part, and the validated, simplified AIH score is the perfect choice for evaluating the AIH part. The analysis of DIAIH publications revealed that 12/20 reports (60%) presented cases assessed by both the RUCAM and the simplified AIH score, providing 49 drugs and drug combinations as causative drugs in up to 25 cases of DIAIH. Serum alanine aminotransferase activities of up to 3489 UL and high titers of autoimmune parameters such as anti-nuclear antibodies, anti-smooth-muscle antibodies, and soluble liver antigen antibodies supported DIAIH diagnosis. In contrast, 4/20 reports (20%) applied only RUCAM, and 2/20 reports (10%) used only the simplified AIH score; these 6 reports therefore provided insufficient criteria for a valid DIAIH diagnosis. Moreover, 2/20 reports (10%) did not use any causality algorithm, providing elusive features of DIAIH. While DIAIH is clearly restricted to drugs as responsible agents, this term is erroneously used to refer to disease induced by non-drugs such as herbs, green tea, dimethoate (an organophosphate insecticide), dietary supplements, biologics, herbal remedies, different viruses, and bacteria, as well as vaccines. For diseases induced by these agents, a better term could be, for instance, non-drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis. Drug cessation and immunotherapy with corticosteroids and azathioprine comprise the treatment of choice. The characteristics of DIAIH can best be described if both the RUCAM and the simplified AIH score are used concomitantly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Liver Diseases—2nd Edition)
19 pages, 1099 KB  
Review
Pathophysiological Differences and Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune and Drug-Induced Hepatitis
by Nicola Zeni, Alessandro Cristofani, Salvatore Silvio Piano, Massimo Bolognesi and Antonietta Romano
Livers 2025, 5(2), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/livers5020022 - 13 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4452
Abstract
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are major causes of liver inflammation with distinct pathophysiology but overlapping clinical features. Among acute cases, DILI is a key differential diagnosis for AIH, especially when drug history is unclear or the injury is non-dose-dependent. [...] Read more.
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are major causes of liver inflammation with distinct pathophysiology but overlapping clinical features. Among acute cases, DILI is a key differential diagnosis for AIH, especially when drug history is unclear or the injury is non-dose-dependent. Mechanisms of DILI include direct toxicity, metabolic idiosyncrasies, and immune-mediated responses that can mimic AIH. Moreover, certain drugs can induce AIH-like syndromes, further complicating the diagnosis. While causality assessment tools aid initial evaluations, liver biopsy remains valuable for distinguishing AIH from DILI; given these complexities, hepatologist consultation is often essential to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment management. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3930 KB  
Article
Cellular Metabolomics Reveals Differences in the Scope of Liver Protection Between Ammonium-Based Glycyrrhizinate and Magnesium Isoglycyrrhizinate
by Yihua Zhang, Han Hao, Hui Li, Qiong Duan, Xiaoming Zheng, Yan Feng, Kun Yang and Shigang Shen
Metabolites 2025, 15(4), 263; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15040263 - 10 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1405
Abstract
Background: Despite the well-established liver-protective efficacy of monoammonium glycyrrhizinate (MONO), diammonium glycyrrhizinate (DIAM), and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MAGN), which has been translated into clinical practice, their clinical differentiation remains elusive owing to their structural similarities and overlapping therapeutic effects. Methods: The present study delves [...] Read more.
Background: Despite the well-established liver-protective efficacy of monoammonium glycyrrhizinate (MONO), diammonium glycyrrhizinate (DIAM), and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MAGN), which has been translated into clinical practice, their clinical differentiation remains elusive owing to their structural similarities and overlapping therapeutic effects. Methods: The present study delves into the pharmacokinetics, cellular-level liver-protective potencies, and underlying mechanisms of action of these three compounds through a comprehensive analysis. Results: The findings reveal that both DIAM and MAGN exhibit superior bioavailability and hepatoprotective profiles compared to MONO. Notably, an investigation of the metabolic pathways mediating liver protection in normal human liver cells (LO2), utilizing an ultra-performance liquid chromatography–time of flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF-MS/MSe) platform, demonstrated that MAGN augments antioxidant components, thereby favoring its application in drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Conversely, DIAM appears to be a more suitable candidate for addressing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and viral hepatitis. Conclusion: This study contributes novel perspectives on the mechanisms of action and potential clinical utilities of DIAM and MAGN in liver disease prevention and management. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop