Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (15)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = discogenic LBP

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 689 KiB  
Review
Discogenic Low Back Pain: Anatomic and Pathophysiologic Characterization, Clinical Evaluation, Biomarkers, AI, and Treatment Options
by Matteo De Simone, Anis Choucha, Elena Ciaglia, Valeria Conti, Giuseppina Pecoraro, Alessandro Santurro, Annibale Alessandro Puca, Marco Cascella and Giorgio Iaconetta
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5915; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195915 - 3 Oct 2024
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 4899
Abstract
Discogenic low back pain (LBP) is a significant clinical condition arising from degeneration of the intervertebral disc, a common yet complex cause of chronic pain, defined by fissuring in the annulus fibrosus resulting in vascularization of growing granulation tissue and growth of nociceptive [...] Read more.
Discogenic low back pain (LBP) is a significant clinical condition arising from degeneration of the intervertebral disc, a common yet complex cause of chronic pain, defined by fissuring in the annulus fibrosus resulting in vascularization of growing granulation tissue and growth of nociceptive nerve fibers along the laceration area. This paper delves into the anatomical and pathophysiological underpinnings of discogenic LBP, emphasizing the role of intervertebral disc degeneration in the onset of pain. The pathogenesis is multifactorial, involving processes like mitochondrial dysfunction, accumulation of advanced glycation end products, and pyroptosis, all contributing to disc degeneration and subsequent pain. Despite its prevalence, diagnosing discogenic LBP is challenging due to the overlapping symptoms with other forms of LBP and the absence of definitive diagnostic criteria. Current diagnostic approaches include clinical evaluations, imaging techniques, and the exploration of potential biomarkers. Treatment strategies range from conservative management, such as physical therapy and pharmacological interventions, to more invasive procedures such as spinal injections and surgery. Emerging therapies targeting molecular pathways involved in disc degeneration are under investigation and hold potential for future clinical application. This paper highlights the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach combining clinical, imaging, and molecular data to enhance the accuracy of diagnosis and the effectiveness of treatment for discogenic LBP, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3887 KiB  
Protocol
The Effect of an Active Break Intervention on Nonspecific Low Back Pain and Musculoskeletal Discomfort during Prolonged Sitting among Young People—Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
by Magdalena Plandowska, Marta Kinga Labecka, Aleksandra Truszczyńska-Baszak, Maciej Płaszewski, Reza Rajabi, Beata Makaruk and Dorota Różańska
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(2), 612; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020612 - 22 Jan 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4371
Abstract
Background: The most recent evidence has shown that the pandemic of COVID-19 caused an increasing problem with spinal pain in the population of teenagers and young adults. This may be explained by prolonged sitting times in flexed positions with electronic devices. Positions maintained [...] Read more.
Background: The most recent evidence has shown that the pandemic of COVID-19 caused an increasing problem with spinal pain in the population of teenagers and young adults. This may be explained by prolonged sitting times in flexed positions with electronic devices. Positions maintained for a prolonged time cause overloading of soft tissue and discogenic symptoms. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the active break program in reducing musculoskeletal discomfort and LBP (low back pain) among young people. Methods: This will be a randomized controlled study. The participants will be recruited from Bachelor’s course students of the Physical Education Department aged 18–25 years. The participants will be assigned to an experimental group (with an active break) and a control group. The group with an active break with lumbar and hip extension exercises will be recommended to take a break for every 30 min of sitting. The control group will receive self-care recommendations. The primary outcomes will be pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale), disability index (Oswestry Disability Index), and perceived musculoskeletal discomfort during prolonged sitting (Borg scale), assessed at baseline and after the intervention, and the Global Perceived Effect, only assessed after the 12-week intervention. The secondary outcome will be a Post-Intervention Questionnaire (a 5-item self-completed questionnaire), only assessed after the 12-week intervention. Results: Our main research outcome—exercise protocols and interventions—will lead to the development of recommendations and protocols for the LBP population. It is important to determine the effect of interventions that are feasible and effective in addressing LBP and perceived musculoskeletal discomfort in young people. Conclusions: This is the first study examining the effect of active breaks with proposed lumbar and hip extension exercises on reducing or decreasing LBP in students based on a search of the literature. Exercises and recommendations will be the basis for developing proprietary preventative and therapeutic programs, which will be implemented in selected educational institutions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Back Pain Management: Clinical Advances and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 5124 KiB  
Article
Safety and Feasibility of Intradiscal Administration of Matrilin-3-Primed Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Spheroids for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: Phase 1 Clinical Trial
by Dong Hyun Lee, Kwang-Sook Park, Hae Eun Shin, Sung Bum Kim, Hyejeong Choi, Seong Bae An, Hyemin Choi, Joo Pyung Kim and Inbo Han
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(23), 16827; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316827 - 27 Nov 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2638
Abstract
Functionally enhanced mesenchymal stromal cells participate in the repair of intervertebral disc. This study aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of intradiscal administration of matrilin-3-primed adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) spheroids with hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain [...] Read more.
Functionally enhanced mesenchymal stromal cells participate in the repair of intervertebral disc. This study aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of intradiscal administration of matrilin-3-primed adipose-derived stromal cell (ASC) spheroids with hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain (LBP). In this single-arm, open-label phase I clinical trial, eight patients with chronic discogenic LBP were observed over 6 months. Each patient underwent a one-time intradiscal injection of 1 mL of 6.0 × 106 cells/disc combined with HA under real-time fluoroscopic guidance. Safety and feasibility were gauged using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and magnetic resonance imaging. All participants remained in the trial, with no reported adverse events linked to the procedure or stem cells. A successful outcome-marked by a minimum 2-point improvement in the VAS pain score and a 10-point improvement in ODI score from the start were observed in six participants. Although the modified Pfirrmann grade remained consistent across all participants, radiological improvements were evident in four patients. Specifically, two patients exhibited reduced high-intensity zones while another two demonstrated decreased disc protrusion. In conclusion, the intradiscal application of matrilin-3-primed ASC spheroids with HA is a safe and feasible treatment option for chronic discogenic LBP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regeneration for Spinal Diseases 4.0)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2781 KiB  
Article
Retrospective Analysis of Factors Associated with the Treatment Outcomes of Intradiscal Platelet-Rich Plasma-Releasate Injection Therapy for Patients with Discogenic Low Back Pain
by Koji Akeda, Tatsuhiko Fujiwara, Norihiko Takegami, Junichi Yamada and Akihiro Sudo
Medicina 2023, 59(4), 640; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040640 - 23 Mar 2023
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2783
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Recently, the clinical application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained popularity for the treatment of degenerative disc diseases. However, the regenerative effects and factors associated with treatment outcomes after intradiscal injection of PRP remain unknown. This study aimed to [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Recently, the clinical application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained popularity for the treatment of degenerative disc diseases. However, the regenerative effects and factors associated with treatment outcomes after intradiscal injection of PRP remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate time-dependent changes in imaging findings related to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration and to identify factors associated with the outcomes of PRP injection therapy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of a previous randomized clinical trial of intradiscal injection of the releasate isolated from PRP (PRPr) in patients with discogenic low back pain (LBP) was performed. Radiographic parameters (segmental angulation and lumbar lordosis) and MRI phenotypes, including Modic changes, disc bulge, and high-intensity zones (HIZs), were evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 months post-injection. Treatment outcomes were evaluated based on the degree of LBP and LBP-related disability at 12 months post-injection. Results: A total of 15 patients (mean age: 33.9 ± 9.5 years) were included in this study. Radiographic parameters showed no significant changes after the PRPr injection. There were no remarkable changes in the prevalence or type of MRI phenotype. Treatment outcomes were significantly improved after treatment; however, the number of targeted discs and the presence of posterior HIZs at baseline were significantly but negatively associated with treatment outcomes. Conclusions: Intradiscal injection of PRPr significantly improved LBP and LBP-related disability 12 months post-injection; however, patients with multiple target lesions or posterior HIZs at baseline were significantly associated with poor treatment outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2165 KiB  
Review
Discogenic Low Back Pain: Anatomy, Pathophysiology and Treatments of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
by Isma Liza Mohd Isa, Seong Lin Teoh, Nurul Huda Mohd Nor and Sabarul Afian Mokhtar
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(1), 208; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010208 - 22 Dec 2022
Cited by 190 | Viewed by 22912
Abstract
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a major contributing factor for discogenic low back pain (LBP), causing a significant global disability. The IVD consists of an inner core proteoglycan-rich nucleus pulposus (NP) and outer lamellae collagen-rich annulus fibrosus (AF) and is confined by a [...] Read more.
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a major contributing factor for discogenic low back pain (LBP), causing a significant global disability. The IVD consists of an inner core proteoglycan-rich nucleus pulposus (NP) and outer lamellae collagen-rich annulus fibrosus (AF) and is confined by a cartilage end plate (CEP), providing structural support and shock absorption against mechanical loads. Changes to degenerative cascades in the IVD cause dysfunction and instability in the lumbar spine. Various treatments include pharmacological, rehabilitation or surgical interventions that aim to relieve pain; however, these modalities do not halt the pathologic events of disc degeneration or promote tissue regeneration. Loss of stem and progenitor markers, imbalance of the extracellular matrix (ECM), increase of inflammation, sensory hyperinnervation and vascularization, and associated signaling pathways have been identified as the onset and progression of disc degeneration. To better understand the pain originating from IVD, our review focuses on the anatomy of IVD and the pathophysiology of disc degeneration that contribute to the development of discogenic pain. We highlight the key mechanisms and associated signaling pathways underlying disc degeneration causing discogenic back pain, current clinical treatments, clinical perspective and directions of future therapies. Our review comprehensively provides a better understanding of healthy IVD and degenerative events of the IVD associated with discogenic pain, which helps to model painful disc degeneration as a therapeutic platform and to identify signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for the future treatment of discogenic pain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Molecular Research of Cartilage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4072 KiB  
Article
o-Vanillin Modulates Cell Phenotype and Extracellular Vesicles of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Intervertebral Disc Cells
by Li Li, Kai Sheng, Matthew Mannarino, Peter Jarzem, Hosni Cherif and Lisbet Haglund
Cells 2022, 11(22), 3589; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11223589 - 13 Nov 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3519
Abstract
Human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) and extracellular vesicle (EV) therapy is a promising treatment for discogenic low back pain (LBP). Although promising, major obstacles remain to be overcome. Cellular senescence reduces self-renewal and multipotent potentials, and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype creates an inflammatory [...] Read more.
Human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) and extracellular vesicle (EV) therapy is a promising treatment for discogenic low back pain (LBP). Although promising, major obstacles remain to be overcome. Cellular senescence reduces self-renewal and multipotent potentials, and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype creates an inflammatory environment negatively affecting tissue homeostasis. Reducing senescence could therefore improve regenerative approaches. Ortho-Vanillin (o-Vanillin) has senolytic activity and anti-inflammatory properties and could be a valuable supplement to MSC and EV therapy. Here, we used direct co-culture experiments to evaluate proteoglycan synthesis, inflammatory mediators, and senescent cells in the presence or absence of o-Vanillin. EV release and transfer between hMSCs and intervertebral disc cells (DCs) was examined, and the effect on hMSC differentiation and DC phenotype was evaluated in the presence and absence of o-Vanillin. This study demonstrates that o-Vanillin affects cell communication, enhances hMSC differentiation and improves DC phenotype. Co-cultures of DCs and hMSCs resulted in increased proteoglycan synthesis, a decreased number of senescent cells and decreased release of the cytokines IL6 and 8. Effects that were further enhanced by o-Vanillin. o-Vanillin profoundly increased EV release and/or uptake by hMSCs and DCs. DC markers were significantly upregulated in both cell types in response to conditioned media of o-Vanillin treated donor cells. Collectively, this study demonstrates that o-Vanillin affects hMSC and DC crosstalk and suggests that combining hMSCs and senolytic compounds may improve the outcome of cell supplementation and EV therapy for LBP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 1179 KiB  
Article
Platelet-Rich Plasma-Releasate (PRPr) for the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain Patients: Long-Term Follow-Up Survey
by Koji Akeda, Norihiko Takegami, Junichi Yamada, Tatsuhiko Fujiwara, Kohshi Ohishi, Satoshi Tamaru and Akihiro Sudo
Medicina 2022, 58(3), 428; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030428 - 16 Mar 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 4880
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Clinical studies of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of low back pain (LBP) have been reported; however, less is known about its long-term efficiency. Materials and Methods: This study was a long-term follow-up of a previous prospective clinical feasibility [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Clinical studies of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of low back pain (LBP) have been reported; however, less is known about its long-term efficiency. Materials and Methods: This study was a long-term follow-up of a previous prospective clinical feasibility study for the use of PRP releasate (PRPr) to treat discogenic LBP patients. Among 14 patients, 11 patients were evaluated for a long-term survey. The efficacy was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP intensity and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) for LBP-related disability. Radiographic disc height was evaluated for seven patients. Results: Improvements in VAS and RDQ were sustained at an average of 5.9 years after the intradiscal injection of PRPr (p < 0.01 vs. baseline, respectively). Clinically meaningful improvements (more than 30% decrease from baseline) in VAS and RDQ were identified in 91% of patients at final survey. The radiographic measurement of disc height of PRPr-injected discs showed a mild decrease (13.8% decrease compared to baseline) during the average 5.9 years. Conclusions: The results of this study with a small number of patients suggest that the intradiscal injection of PRPr has a safe and efficacious effect on LBP improvement for more than 5 years after treatment. Further large-scale studies would be needed to confirm the clinical evidence for the use of PRPr for the treatment of patients with discogenic LBP. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 735 KiB  
Article
A High Body Mass Index and the Vacuum Phenomenon Upregulate Pain-Related Molecules in Human Degenerated Intervertebral Discs
by Masayuki Miyagi, Kentaro Uchida, Sho Inoue, Shotaro Takano, Mitsufumi Nakawaki, Ayumu Kawakubo, Hiroyuki Sekiguchi, Toshiyuki Nakazawa, Takayuki Imura, Wataru Saito, Eiki Shirasawa, Akiyoshi Kuroda, Shinsuke Ikeda, Yuji Yokozeki, Yusuke Mimura, Tsutomu Akazawa, Masashi Takaso and Gen Inoue
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(6), 2973; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23062973 - 10 Mar 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3158
Abstract
Animal studies suggest that pain-related-molecule upregulation in degenerated intervertebral discs (IVDs) potentially leads to low back pain (LBP). We hypothesized that IVD mechanical stress and axial loading contribute to discogenic LBP’s pathomechanism. This study aimed to elucidate the relationships among the clinical findings, [...] Read more.
Animal studies suggest that pain-related-molecule upregulation in degenerated intervertebral discs (IVDs) potentially leads to low back pain (LBP). We hypothesized that IVD mechanical stress and axial loading contribute to discogenic LBP’s pathomechanism. This study aimed to elucidate the relationships among the clinical findings, radiographical findings, and pain-related-molecule expression in human degenerated IVDs. We harvested degenerated-IVD samples from 35 patients during spinal interbody fusion surgery. Pain-related molecules including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL)-6, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES1), and nerve growth factor (NGF) were determined. We also recorded preoperative clinical findings including body mass index (BMI), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and radiographical findings including the vacuum phenomenon (VP) and spinal instability. Furthermore, we compared pain-related-molecule expression between the VP (−) and (+) groups. BMI was significantly correlated with the ODI, CGRP, and mPGES-1 levels. In the VP (+) group, mPGES-1 levels were significantly higher than in the VP (−) group. Additionally, CGRP and mPGES-1 were significantly correlated. Axial loading and mechanical stress correlated with CGRP and mPGES-1 expression and not with inflammatory cytokine or NGF expression. Therefore, axial loading and mechanical stress upregulate CGRP and mPGES-1 in human degenerated IVDs, potentially leading to chronic discogenic LBP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regeneration for Spinal Diseases 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1544 KiB  
Article
Platelet-Rich Plasma Releasate versus Corticosteroid for the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
by Koji Akeda, Kohshi Ohishi, Norihiko Takegami, Takao Sudo, Junichi Yamada, Tatsuhiko Fujiwara, Rui Niimi, Takeshi Matsumoto, Yuki Nishimura, Toru Ogura, Satoshi Tamaru and Akihiro Sudo
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(2), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020304 - 7 Jan 2022
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 5327
Abstract
Clinical application of platelet-rich plasma is gaining popularity in treating low back pain (LBP). This study investigated the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma releasate (PRPr) injection into degenerated discs of patients with discogenic LBP. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial was conducted. [...] Read more.
Clinical application of platelet-rich plasma is gaining popularity in treating low back pain (LBP). This study investigated the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma releasate (PRPr) injection into degenerated discs of patients with discogenic LBP. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial was conducted. Sixteen patients with discogenic LBP received an intradiscal injection of either autologous PRPr or corticosteroid (CS). Patients in both groups who wished to have PRPr treatment received an optional injection of PRPr eight weeks later. The primary outcome was change in VAS from baseline at eight weeks. Secondary outcomes were pain, disability, quality of life (QOL), image analyses of disc degeneration, and safety for up to 60 weeks. The VAS change at eight weeks did not significantly differ between the two groups. Fifteen patients received the optional injection. Compared to the CS group, the PRPr group had a significantly improved disability score at 26 weeks and walking ability scores at four and eight weeks. Radiographic disc height and MRI grading score were unchanged from baseline. PRPr caused no clinically important adverse events. PRPr injection showed clinically significant improvements in LBP intensity equal to that of CS. PRPr treatment relieved pain, and improved disability and QOL during 60 weeks of observation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive Spinal Treatment: State of the Art)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2568 KiB  
Article
DUSP-1 Induced by PGE2 and PGE1 Attenuates IL-1β-Activated MAPK Signaling, Leading to Suppression of NGF Expression in Human Intervertebral Disc Cells
by Takuya Kusakabe, Yasunobu Sawaji, Kenji Endo, Hidekazu Suzuki, Takamitsu Konishi, Asato Maekawa, Kazuma Murata and Kengo Yamamoto
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(1), 371; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010371 - 29 Dec 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2783
Abstract
The molecular mechanism of discogenic low back pain (LBP) involves nonphysiological nerve invasion into a degenerated intervertebral disc (IVD), induced by nerve growth factor (NGF). Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are mainly used in the treatment of LBP, and act by suppressing the inflammatory [...] Read more.
The molecular mechanism of discogenic low back pain (LBP) involves nonphysiological nerve invasion into a degenerated intervertebral disc (IVD), induced by nerve growth factor (NGF). Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are mainly used in the treatment of LBP, and act by suppressing the inflammatory mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), which is induced by inflammatory stimuli, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β). However, in our previous in vitro study using cultured human IVD cells, we demonstrated that the induction of NGF by IL-1β is augmented by a selective COX-2 inhibitor, and that PGE2 and PGE1 suppress NGF expression. Therefore, in this study, to elucidate the mechanism of NGF suppression by PGE2 and PGE1, we focused on mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and its phosphatase, dual-specificity phosphatase (DUSP)-1. IL-1β-induced NGF expression was altered in human IVD cells by MAPK pathway inhibitors. PGE2 and PGE1 enhanced IL-1β-induced DUSP-1 expression, and suppressed the phosphorylation of MAPKs in human IVD cells. In DUSP-1 knockdown cells established using small interfering RNA, IL-1β-induced phosphorylation of MAPKs was enhanced and prolonged, and NGF expression was significantly enhanced. These results suggest that PGE2 and PGE1 suppress IL-1β-induced NGF expression by suppression of the MAPK signaling pathway, accompanied by increased DUSP-1 expression. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Regeneration for Spinal Diseases 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1281 KiB  
Article
Physical Abilities in Low Back Pain Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study with Exploratory Comparison of Patient Subgroups
by Nejc Šarabon, Nace Vreček, Christian Hofer, Stefan Löfler, Žiga Kozinc and Helmut Kern
Life 2021, 11(3), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11030226 - 10 Mar 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3726
Abstract
An abundance of literature has investigated the association between low back pain (LBP) and physical ability or function. It has been shown that LBP patients display reduced range of motion, decreased balance ability, impaired proprioception, and lower strength compared to asymptomatic persons. The [...] Read more.
An abundance of literature has investigated the association between low back pain (LBP) and physical ability or function. It has been shown that LBP patients display reduced range of motion, decreased balance ability, impaired proprioception, and lower strength compared to asymptomatic persons. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between LBP patients and healthy controls in terms of several physical abilities. Based on the premised that different biomechanical and physiological causes and consequences could be related to different types of LBP, a secondary exploratory attempt of the study was to examine the differences between LBP subgroups based on the pain location (local or referred) or type of pathology (discogenic or degenerative) on the level of impairment of function and ability. Participants performed range of motion tests, trunk maximal voluntary contraction force tests, a sitting balance assessment, the timed up-and-go test, the chair rise test, and the trunk reposition error test. Compared to the control group, symptomatic patients on average showed 45.7% lower trunk extension (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.33) and 27.7 % lower trunk flexion force (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.37) during maximal voluntary contraction. LBP patients exhibited decreased sitting balance ability and lower scores in mobility tests (all p < 0.001). There were no differences between groups in Schober’s test and trunk repositioning error (p > 0.05). No differences were observed among the LBP subgroups. The exploratory analyses are limited by the sample size and uncertain validity of the diagnostic procedures within this study. Further studies with appropriate diagnostic procedures and perhaps a different subgrouping of the LBP patients are needed to elucidate if different types of LBP are related to altered biomechanics, physiology, and function. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Exercise Biomechanics and Physiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1004 KiB  
Review
Advances in Tissue Engineering for Disc Repair
by Chang Kyu Lee, Dong Hwa Heo, Hungtae Chung, Eun Ji Roh, Anjani Darai, Jae Won Kyung, Hyemin Choi, Su Yeon Kwon, Basanta Bhujel and Inbo Han
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(4), 1919; https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041919 - 22 Feb 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5285
Abstract
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a leading cause of chronic low back pain (LBP) that results in serious disability and significant economic burden. IVD degeneration alters the disc structure and spine biomechanics, resulting in subsequent structural changes throughout the spine. Currently, treatments of [...] Read more.
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a leading cause of chronic low back pain (LBP) that results in serious disability and significant economic burden. IVD degeneration alters the disc structure and spine biomechanics, resulting in subsequent structural changes throughout the spine. Currently, treatments of chronic LBP due to IVD degeneration include conservative treatments, such as pain medication and physiotherapy, and surgical treatments, such as removal of herniated disc without or with spinal fusion. However, none of these treatments can completely restore a degenerated disc and its function. Thus, although the exact pathogenesis of disc degeneration remains unclear, there are studies examining the effectiveness of biological approaches, such as growth factor injection, gene therapy, and cell transplantation, in promoting IVD regeneration. Furthermore, tissue engineering using a combination of cell transplantation and biomaterials has emerged as a promising new approach for repair or restoration of degenerated discs. The main purpose of this review was to provide an overview of the current status of tissue engineering applications for IVD regenerative therapy by performing literature searches using PubMed. Significant advances in tissue engineering have opened the door to a new generation of regenerative therapies for the treatment of chronic discogenic LBP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intervertebral Disc Regeneration)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 882 KiB  
Review
Genetic Therapy for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
by Eun Ji Roh, Anjani Darai, Jae Won Kyung, Hyemin Choi, Su Yeon Kwon, Basanta Bhujel, Kyoung Tae Kim and Inbo Han
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 1579; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041579 - 4 Feb 2021
Cited by 96 | Viewed by 7840
Abstract
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration can cause chronic lower back pain (LBP), leading to disability. Despite significant advances in the treatment of discogenic LBP, the limitations of current treatments have sparked interest in biological approaches, including growth factor and stem cell injection, as new [...] Read more.
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration can cause chronic lower back pain (LBP), leading to disability. Despite significant advances in the treatment of discogenic LBP, the limitations of current treatments have sparked interest in biological approaches, including growth factor and stem cell injection, as new treatment options for patients with chronic LBP due to IVD degeneration (IVDD). Gene therapy represents exciting new possibilities for IVDD treatment, but treatment is still in its infancy. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to provide an overview of the principles and current state of gene therapy for IVDD. Gene transfer to degenerated disc cells in vitro and in animal models is reviewed. In addition, this review describes the use of gene silencing by RNA interference (RNAi) and gene editing by the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) system, as well as the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in vitro and in animal models. Significant technological advances in recent years have opened the door to a new generation of intradiscal gene therapy for the treatment of chronic discogenic LBP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2734 KiB  
Article
TRPV4 Inhibition and CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Reduce Inflammation Induced by Hyperphysiological Stretching in Human Annulus Fibrosus Cells
by Elena Cambria, Matthias J. E. Arlt, Sandra Wandel, Olga Krupkova, Wolfgang Hitzl, Fabian S. Passini, Oliver N. Hausmann, Jess G. Snedeker, Stephen J. Ferguson and Karin Wuertz-Kozak
Cells 2020, 9(7), 1736; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071736 - 21 Jul 2020
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 6776
Abstract
Mechanical loading and inflammation interact to cause degenerative disc disease and low back pain (LBP). However, the underlying mechanosensing and mechanotransductive pathways are poorly understood. This results in untargeted pharmacological treatments that do not take the mechanical aspect of LBP into account. We [...] Read more.
Mechanical loading and inflammation interact to cause degenerative disc disease and low back pain (LBP). However, the underlying mechanosensing and mechanotransductive pathways are poorly understood. This results in untargeted pharmacological treatments that do not take the mechanical aspect of LBP into account. We investigated the role of the mechanosensitive ion channel TRPV4 in stretch-induced inflammation in human annulus fibrosus (AF) cells. The cells were cyclically stretched to 20% hyperphysiological strain. TRPV4 was either inhibited with the selective TRPV4 antagonist GSK2193874 or knocked out (KO) via CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. The gene expression, inflammatory mediator release and MAPK pathway activation were analyzed. Hyperphysiological cyclic stretching significantly increased the IL6, IL8, and COX2 mRNA, PGE2 release, and activated p38 MAPK. The TRPV4 pharmacological inhibition significantly attenuated these effects. TRPV4 KO further prevented the stretch-induced upregulation of IL8 mRNA and reduced IL6 and IL8 release, thus supporting the inhibition data. We provide novel evidence that TRPV4 transduces hyperphysiological mechanical signals into inflammatory responses in human AF cells, possibly via p38. Additionally, we show for the first time the successful gene editing of human AF cells via CRISPR-Cas9. The pharmacological inhibition or CRISPR-based targeting of TRPV4 may constitute a potential therapeutic strategy to tackle discogenic LBP in patients with AF injury. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MiNICAD Special Issue: Ion Channels and Human Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1092 KiB  
Article
The Role of Cutibacterium acnes in Intervertebral Disc Inflammation
by Bettina Schmid, Oliver Hausmann, Wolfgang Hitzl, Yvonne Achermann and Karin Wuertz-Kozak
Biomedicines 2020, 8(7), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8070186 - 30 Jun 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4536
Abstract
Recently, the role of infection of the intervertebral disc (IVD) with Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) as a contributor to disc-related low back pain (LBP) has been discussed. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how C. acnes contributes [...] Read more.
Recently, the role of infection of the intervertebral disc (IVD) with Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) as a contributor to disc-related low back pain (LBP) has been discussed. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how C. acnes contributes to the inflammatory processes during IVD disease. The prevalence of C. acnes infection in human IVD tissue was determined by aerobic and anaerobic culture. Thereafter, primary human IVD cells were infected with a reference and a clinical C. acnes strain and analyzed for pro-inflammatory markers (gene/protein level). In a subsequent experiment, the involvement of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway was investigated by co-treatment with sparstolonin B, a TLR2/4 inhibitor. We detected C. acnes in 10% of IVD biopsies (with either herniation or degeneration). Stimulating IVD cells with both C. acnes strains strongly and significantly upregulated expression of Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). IL-6, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, and iNOS expression was reduced upon TLR2/4 inhibition in 3 out of 5 donors, whereby responders and non-responders could not be differentiated by their basal TLR2 or TLR4 expression levels. We demonstrate that exposure of IVD cells to C. acnes induces an inflammatory response that may contribute to the development of discogenic LBP by involving TLR2/4 activation, yet only in a subgroup of patients. Whether the same response will be observed in vivo and where lower inoculums are present remains to be proven in future studies. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop