Search Results (70)

The recommended treatment for early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 stages IA–IB2 and selected IIA1) is surgery, followed by either observation or adjuvant therapy, based on individual risk factors. Surgical management has evolved from extensive radical procedures to more conservative strategies, allowing for fertility-preserving options in appropriately selected patients. In 2018, a landmark study (LACC trial) evaluated the surgical approach to radical hysterectomy, comparing open vs. minimally invasive surgery. The results demonstrated that minimally invasive surgery was associated with worse disease-free and overall survival, leading to guidelines changes that recommend the open radical hysterectomy as the new standard of care. More recently, results from the prospective randomized SHAPE trial demonstrated that in well-selected patients with low-risk early-stage cervical cancer, recurrence rates are comparable between simple hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy. An ongoing study, the CONTESSA trial, is evaluating the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the setting of fertility preservation for lesions measuring 2–4 cm. In addition, ongoing studies are evaluating different surgical approaches for both simple hysterectomy (LASH trial) and radical hysterectomy (ROCC/GOG-3043 and RACC trials), with a focus on comparing oncologic outcomes. Attention has also turned to refining lymph node assessment. Sentinel lymph node biopsy has become a standard staging strategy with reduced morbidity. The SENTICOL I-II and SENTIX/ENGOT-Cx2 trials support its safety and diagnostic accuracy in early-stage disease. This article offers a comprehensive overview of recently published prospective trials that have shaped clinical practice in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. It focuses on surgical approaches and radicality, the role of sentinel lymph node mapping, and fertility-sparing treatments. The review further draws attention to ongoing investigations and novel studies that may influence future directions in the field. Full article

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is a critical indicator in assessing the success of oncological treatments for head and neck malignancies, reflecting their impact on physiological functions and psychosocial well-being beyond mere survival. Treatments (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy) pose multiple functional and emotional challenges, and recent advancements underscore the necessity of evaluating post-treatment QoL. Objective: This literature review investigates the impact of oncological treatment on the QoL of patients with malignant head and neck cancers (oral, oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, laryngeal) and identifies factors influencing their QoL index. Methodology: Using a PICO framework, studies from PubMed Central were analyzed, selected based on inclusion (English publications, full text, PROM results) and exclusion criteria. The last research was conducted on 6 April 2025. From 231 identified studies, 49 were included after applying filters (MeSH: “Quality of Life,” “laryngeal cancer,” “oral cavity cancer,” etc.). Data were organized in Excel, and the methodology adhered to PRISMA standards. Results: Treatment Impact: Oncological treatments significantly affect QoL, with acute post-treatment declines in functions such as speech, swallowing, and emotional well-being (anxiety, depression). Partial recovery depends on rehabilitative interventions. Influencing Factors: Treatment type, disease stage, socioeconomic, and demographic contexts influence QoL. De-escalated treatments and prompt rehabilitation improve recovery, while complications like trismus, dysphagia, or persistent hearing issues reduce long-term QoL. Assessment Tools: Standardized PROM questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, MDADI, HADS) highlighted QoL variations. Studies from Europe, North America, and Asia indicate regional differences in outcomes. Limitations: Retrospective designs, small sample sizes, and PROM variability limit generalizability. Multicentric studies with extended follow-up are recommended. Conclusions: Oncological treatments for head and neck malignancies have a complex impact on QoL, necessitating personalized and multidisciplinary strategies. De-escalated therapies, early rehabilitation, and continuous monitoring are essential for optimizing functional and psychosocial outcomes. Methodological gaps highlight the need for standardized research. Full article

Background/Objectives: With evolving guidelines favoring de-escalation in the management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC), options such as active surveillance and minimally invasive procedures are now considered for patients with low-risk disease. However, a subset of PTMCs—particularly non-incidental cases—may exhibit aggressive behavior. This study compares disease characteristics and outcomes between incidental and non-incidental PTMCs over a 10-year period. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective comparative analysis utilizing a prospectively collected database of patients referred for thyroid surgery. Results: Papillary thyroid carcinoma accounted for 86.7% of thyroid malignancies, with PTMC comprising 36.2% (137 patients). Incidental PTMC represented 109 out of 1012 patients undergoing surgery for benign thyroid disease (10.8%). Non-incidental PTMC (NIPTMC), diagnosed preoperatively and presenting clinically without coexisting thyroid disease, was identified in 28 patients (20.4%). NIPTMCs were more frequently associated with high-risk features (75% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.004), including extrathyroidal extension (21.43% vs. 7.3% p = 0.0015), positive central lymph nodes (21.43% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.0291), positive lateral lymph nodes (28.6% vs. 0% p = 0.012), and lymphovascular invasion (3.6% vs. 0%). Multifocal PTMC was seen in 37 patients (27%), of which 27 had bilobar disease. Multifocal tumors had a higher likelihood of high-risk features (48.6% vs. 14%, p = 0.007). NIPTMC was a significant predictor of multifocality (p = 0.0098). All patients underwent surgery, none opted for active surveillance. Conclusions: NIPTMC is more often associated with high-risk features and multifocality, necessitating more extensive surgery. These findings emphasize the need for careful preoperative risk stratification to guide individualized management. Full article

Advances in breast cancer treatment have shifted the focus from maximizing local control to balancing oncologic efficacy with treatment de-escalation and toxicity reduction. Whole-breast irradiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery remains the standard of care, but with up to 90% of recurrences occurring near the tumor bed, partial breast irradiation (PBI) has emerged as a viable alternative. Large randomized controlled trials (such as IMPORT LOW, Florence, and GEC-ESTRO) have demonstrated comparable ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rates between PBI and WBI, reinforcing its oncologic safety in well-selected patients. However, challenges remain in optimizing fractionation schedules, refining patient selection, and minimizing late toxicity. Recent innovations, including MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) and neoadjuvant PBI, offer improved tumor targeting, real-time plan adaptation, and enhanced normal tissue sparing. These advancements hold promise for further reducing radiation-related morbidity and improving cosmetic outcomes. As PBI progresses, integrating novel imaging modalities and hypofractionated regimens will be crucial to refining protocols. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on PBI techniques, clinical outcomes, and emerging technologies to guide future research and clinical decision-making in precision breast radiotherapy. Full article

The prevalence and mortality associated with breast cancer have forced healthcare providers to leverage surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy to achieve a cure. Whereas mortality has significantly dropped over the decades, long-term toxicities and healthcare costs are prohibitive. Therefore, a better understanding of tumor biology through molecular profiling is being utilized for de-escalation of treatment where appropriate. As research evolves, there is growing evidence that less aggressive treatment regimens, when appropriately tailored, can be equally effective for certain patient populations. This approach not only enhances the quality of life for patients by reducing the financial, physical, and emotional burdens associated with more invasive therapies but also promotes a more personalized treatment strategy. By focusing on precision medicine and understanding the biological characteristics of tumors, healthcare providers and patients can make informed decisions that balance safety with efficacy. The field of molecular profiling is a promising avenue for precision-targeted de-escalation and escalation of therapy to minimize the risk–benefit ratio. Full article

Background and Objectives: Although breast surgery has undergone a drastic de-escalation in recent decades, axillary dissection is still indicated in some selected cases. Unfortunately, in 3–85% of cases, complications such as seroma formation occur, highlighting the need for more accurate hemostasis systems. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of absorbable polysaccharide hemostatic such as Haemocer^TM in preventing postoperative seroma. Materials and Methods: Patients referred to two surgery centers for a diagnosed breast cancer and candidates for axillary lymph node dissection were retrospectively evaluated and included in Group A (treated with Haemocer^TM) and B (control group). The primary endpoints were the drain output after 48 h, the daily amount just before the removal, and the duration of axillary drainage placement. Secondary endpoints included the presence of seroma at the ultrasound (US) follow-up, significant blood loss, hematoma, the duration of surgery, and postsurgical complications. Results: The drain output within 48 h was 196 ± 93 vs. 286 ± 38 mL in Groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.013). The daily output before the removal was 40 ± 7 mL in Group A and 47 ± 2 mL in Group B (p = 0.049). The duration of axillary drainage placement was shorter in the experimental group (7 ± 3 days) compared to the control group (10 ± 1 days) with a statistically significant difference (0.037). During the US follow-up, on days 7, 15, and 30, the number of patients affected by seroma and the volumes were lower in the experimental group. Conclusions: The adsorbable hemostatic powder proved to be effective both in reducing the volume of drained fluid postoperatively and in decreasing the number and volume of reported seromas during the US follow-up. Full article

Background: The incidence of patients showing neck metastasis and no obvious primary tumor at the initial diagnostic evaluation or neck cancer of unknown primary (NCUP) is rising. It is estimated that a relevant part of these tumors arises in the tonsillar crypts or base of the tongue and are p16+-related. However, today, the detection rate of the primary tumor is suboptimal. Identifying the primary tumor and its biomolecular characterization is essential since it influences the treatment administered, possibly reducing radiation fields and providing de-escalation to primary surgical management. However, p16 IHC (immunohistochemistry) might not be sufficient to diagnose HPV-related OPSCC. The other subset of patients discussed are the HPV-positive patients who have a history of tobacco exposure and/or p53 mutations. Possible factors that could negatively influence the outcomes of these patients are investigated and discussed below. So, this paper aims to analyze the diagnostic, bio-molecular, clinico-radiological, morphological, prognostic and therapeutical aspects of p16-positive OPSCC, highlighting the possible bias that can occur during the diagnostic and prognostic process. Methods: A narrative review was conducted to investigate the biases in the diagnostic and therapeutic process of two groups of patients: those who are p16-positive but HPV-negative patients, and those who are p16-positive and HPV-positive with exposure to traditional risk factors and/or p53 mutations. The keywords used for the literature research included the following: NCUP, OPSCC, p16IHC, HPV testing, p16 positive HPV negative OPSCC, p16 positive HPV positive OPSCC, tonsillectomy, tobacco exposure, p53 mutations, cystic neck metastasis, extranodal extension (ENE), radiotherapy, de-escalation and neck neck dissection. Results: HPV-positive OPSCC has specific clinico-radiological features. Bilateral tonsillectomy should be considered for the identification of the primary tumor. P16 IHC alone is not sufficient for diagnosing HPV-related OPSCC; additional detection methods are required. The role of tobacco exposure and p53 mutations should be investigated especially in cases of HPV-positive tumors. Extranodal extension (ENE) must be taken into consideration in the prognostic staging of HPV-positive tumors. Surgical primary treatment involving neck dissection (ND) and bilateral tonsillectomy followed by adjuvant radiation may represent the most appropriate approach for N3 cases. Diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutical implications must be addressed considering clinical, biomolecular and morphological aspects. At least today, the numerous biases that are still present influencing the diagnostic and prognostic process do not permit considering de-escalation protocols. Conclusions: A precise and accurate diagnosis is required in order to adequately stage and manage p16+ OPSCC, particularly with neck metastasis. The role of tobacco exposure and/or p53 mutations must be considered not only in p16+ OPSCC but especially in HPV-positive OPSCC. Until a more accurate diagnosis is possible, ENE should be considered even in p16+HPV+ OPSCC. Primary surgery with unilateral ND and bilateral tonsillectomy might be the treatment of choice given the numerous diagnostic and prognostic pitfalls. Therefore, it is inappropriate and risky to propose de-escalation protocols in routine clinical practice due to the risk of undertreatment. Full article

Backgrounds: This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6–2.1%). Conclusions: SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations. Full article

Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is recommended after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy (with risk factors). Consideration of pros and cons, including potential side effects, demands the optimization of adjuvant RT and a risk-adapted approach. There is clear de-escalation in fractionation—hypofractionation should be considered standard. For selected low-risk situations, PBI only or even the omission of RT might be appropriate. In contrast, tendencies toward escalating RT are obvious. Preoperative RT seems attractive for patients in whom breast reconstruction is planned or for defining the tumor location more precisely with the potential of giving ablative doses. Dose escalation by a (simultaneous integrated) boost or the combination with new compounds/systemic treatments may increase antitumor efficacy but also toxicity. Despite low evidence, RT for oligometastatic disease is becoming increasingly popular. The omission of axillary dissection in node-positive disease led to an escalation of regional RT. Studies are ongoing to test if any axillary treatment can be omitted and which oligometastatic patients do really benefit from RT. Besides technical improvements, the incorporation of molecular risk profiles and also the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy have the potential to optimize the decision-making concerning if and how local and/or regional RT should be administered. Full article

The incidence of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers has increased in recent decades. While cure rates exceed those of HPV-negative head and neck cancers, both acute and long-term sequelae of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery have led to clinical investigation into de-escalation of treatment. De-escalation trials have sought to reduce long-term treatment-related morbidity by altering or omitting chemotherapy, reducing radiation, or incorporating less invasive surgical resection through transoral surgery. More recent approaches include the use of novel agents such as immunotherapy in place of cisplatin. With the advent of tumor-tissue-modified HPV DNA detection and monitoring in blood, new strategies incorporating this biomarker are being developed. Full article

Background: The SOUND study demonstrated that an axillary de-escalation may be sufficient in locoregional and distant disease control in selected early breast cancer (EBC) patients. To establish any preoperative variables that may drive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission, a study named sentinel omission risk factor (SOFT) 1.23 was planned. Methods: A single-center retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database was designed, aiming at underlying preoperative prognostic factors involved in sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis (lymph node involvement (LN+) vs. negative lymph node (LN−) group). Secondary outcomes included surgical room occupancy analysis for SLNB in patients fulfilling the SOUND study inclusion criteria. The institutional ethical committee Area Territoriale Lazio 2 approved the study (n° 122/23). Results: Between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023, 160 patients were included in the study and 26 (%) were included in the LN+ group. Multifocality, higher cT stage, and larger tumor diameter were reported in the LN+ group (p = 0.020, p = 0.014, and 0.016, respectively). Tumor biology, including estrogen and progesterone receptors, and molecular subtypes showed association with the LN+ group (p < 0.001; p = 0.001; and p = 0.001, respectively). A total of 117 (73.6%) patients were eligible for the SOUND study and the potential operating room time saved was 2696.81 min. Conclusions: De-escalating strategies may rationalize healthcare activities. Multifactorial risk stratification may further refine the selection of patients who could benefit from SLNB omission. Full article

The management of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) presents a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating treatment intensification due to the potential presence of micrometastases. While radical prostatectomy (RP) constitutes one of the primary treatment modalities, the integration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies suggests a paradigm shift towards more aggressive treatment strategies, also guided by new imaging modalities like positron emission tomography using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET). Despite the benefits, treatment intensification raises concerns regarding increased side effects. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on perioperative treatment intensification and de-escalation for high-risk localized and locally advanced PCa patients eligible for surgery. Through a non-systematic literature review conducted via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, we explored various dimensions of perioperative treatments, including neoadjuvant systemic therapies, adjuvant therapies, and the role of novel diagnostic technologies. Emerging evidence provides more support for neoadjuvant systemic therapies. Preliminary results from studies suggest the potential for treatments traditionally reserved for metastatic PCa to show apparent benefit in a non-metastatic setting. The role of adjuvant treatments remains debated, particularly the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients at higher risk of biochemical recurrence. The potential role of radio-guided PSMA lymph node dissection emerges as a cutting-edge approach, offering a targeted method for eradicating disease with greater precision. Innovations such as artificial intelligence and machine learning are potential game-changers, offering new avenues for personalized treatment and improved prognostication. The intensification of surgical treatment in high-risk PCa patients is a dynamic and evolving field, underscored by the integration of traditional and novel therapeutic approaches. As evidence continues to emerge, these strategies will refine patient selection, enhance treatment efficacy, and mitigate the risk of progression, although with an attentive consideration of the associated side effects. Full article

Background/Objectives: De-escalation of axillary surgery is made possible by advancements in both neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and in localisation technology for breast lesions. Magseed^®, developed in 2013 by Dr. Michael Douk of Cambridge, United Kingdom, is a wire-free localisation technology that facilitates the localisation and retrieval of lymph nodes for staging. Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), which entails marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), has emerged as the preferred method to assess residual disease in post-NST node-positive patients. This systematic review and pooled analysis evaluate the performance of Magseed^® in TAD. Methods: The search was carried out in PubMed and Google Scholar. An assessment of localisation, retrieval rates, concordance between MLNB and SLNB, and pathological complete response (pCR) in clinically node-positive patients post NST was undertaken. Results: Nine studies spanning 494 patients and 497 procedures were identified, with a 100% successful deployment rate, a 94.2% (468/497) [95% confidence interval (CI), 93.7–94.7] localisation rate, a 98.8% (491/497) retrieval rate, and a 68.8% (247/359) [95% CI 65.6–72.0] concordance rate. pCR was observed in 47.9% (220/459) ) [95% CI 43.3–52.6] of cases. Subgroup analysis of studies reporting the pathological status of MLNB and SLNB separately revealed an FNR of 4.2% for MLNB and 17.6% for SLNB (p = 0.0013). Mean duration of implantation was 37 days (range: 0–188). Conclusions: These findings highlight magnetic seed localisation’s efficacy in TAD for NST-treated node-positive patients, aiding in accurate axillary pCR identification and safe de-escalation of axillary surgery in excellent responders. Full article

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) presents unique challenges and opportunities for treatment, particularly regarding de-escalation strategies to reduce treatment morbidity without compromising oncological outcomes. This paper examines the role of Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) as a de-escalation strategy in managing HPV-related OPSCC. We conducted a comprehensive literature review from January 2010 to June 2023, focusing on studies exploring TORS outcomes in patients with HPV-positive OPSCC. These findings highlight TORS’s potential to reduce the need for adjuvant therapy, thereby minimizing treatment-related side effects while maintaining high rates of oncological control. TORS offers advantages such as precise tumor resection and the ability to obtain accurate pathological staging, which can guide the tailoring of adjuvant treatments. Some clinical trials provide evidence supporting the use of TORS in specific patient populations. The MC1273 trial demonstrated promising outcomes with lower doses of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following TORS, showing high locoregional tumor control rates and favorable survival outcomes with minimal side effects. ECOG 3311 evaluated upfront TORS followed by histopathologically directed adjuvant therapy, revealing good oncological and functional outcomes, particularly in intermediate-risk patients. The SIRS trial emphasized the benefits of upfront surgery with neck dissection followed by de-escalated RT in patients with favorable survival and excellent functional outcomes. At the same time, the PATHOS trial examined the impact of risk-adapted adjuvant treatment on functional outcomes and survival. The ongoing ADEPT trial investigates reduced-dose adjuvant RT, and the DART-HPV study aims to compare standard adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with a reduced dose of adjuvant RT in HPV-positive OPSCC patients. These trials collectively underscore the potential of TORS in facilitating treatment de-escalation while maintaining favorable oncological and functional outcomes in selected patients with HPV-related OPSCC. The aim of this scoping review is to discuss the challenges of risk stratification, the importance of HPV status determination, and the implications of smoking on treatment outcomes. It also explores the evolving criteria for adjuvant therapy following TORS, focusing on reducing radiation dosage and volume without compromising treatment efficacy. In conclusion, TORS emerges as a viable upfront treatment option for carefully selected patients with HPV-positive OPSCC, offering a pathway toward treatment de-escalation. However, selecting the optimal candidate for TORS-based de-escalation strategies is crucial to fully leverage the benefits of treatment de-intensification. Full article

Prostate cancer is a multi-focal disease that can be treated using surgery, radiation, androgen deprivation, and chemotherapy, depending on its presentation. Standard dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) in the range of 70–80 Gray (GY) is a standard treatment option for prostate cancer. It could be used at different phases of the disease (e.g., as the only primary treatment when the cancer is confined to the prostate gland, combined with other therapies, or as an adjuvant treatment after surgery). Unfortunately, RT for prostate cancer is associated with gastro-intestinal and genitourinary toxicity. We have previously reported that the metabolic modulator lonidamine (LND) produces cancer sensitization through tumor acidification and de-energization in diverse neoplasms. We hypothesized that LND could allow lower RT doses by producing the same effect in prostate cancer, thus reducing the detrimental side effects associated with RT. Using the Seahorse XFe96 and YSI 2300 Stat Plus analyzers, we corroborated the expected LND-induced intracellular acidification and de-energization of isolated human prostate cancer cells using the PC3 cell line. These results were substantiated by non-invasive ³¹P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), studying PC3 prostate cancer xenografts treated with LND (100 mg/kg, i.p.). In addition, we found that LND significantly increased tumor lactate levels in the xenografts using ¹H MRS non-invasively. Subsequently, LND was combined with radiation therapy in a growth delay experiment, where we found that 150 µM LND followed by 4 GY RT produced a significant growth delay in PC3 prostate cancer xenografts, compared to either control, LND, or RT alone. We conclude that the metabolic modulator LND radio-sensitizes experimental prostate cancer models, allowing the use of lower radiation doses and diminishing the potential side effects of RT. These results suggest the possible clinical translation of LND as a radio-sensitizer in patients with prostate cancer. Full article