Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = centromedian nucleus

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 428 KiB  
Review
Consideration of Anesthesia Techniques for Deep Brain Stimulation Implantation in the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Narrative Review
by Alan D. Kaye, Benjamin Esneault, Shreya Deshpande, Joseph Wentling, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Pooja Potharaju and Sahar Shekoohi
Biomolecules 2025, 15(6), 784; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15060784 - 28 May 2025
Viewed by 652
Abstract
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures, affecting millions worldwide. While anti-seizure medications serve as first-line treatment, approximately one-third of patients develop drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), necessitating alternative interventions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising therapy for DRE, [...] Read more.
Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures, affecting millions worldwide. While anti-seizure medications serve as first-line treatment, approximately one-third of patients develop drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), necessitating alternative interventions. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising therapy for DRE, particularly for patients who are ineligible for resective surgery. DBS involves stereotactic implantation of electrodes into target brain regions, such as the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT), centromedian nucleus (CMT), and hippocampus (HC), to modulate aberrant neural activity and to reduce seizure frequency. Anesthesia plays a critical role in DBS implantation, influencing both patient safety and procedural success. The choice of anesthetic technique must balance patient comfort with the preservation of neurophysiological signals used for intraoperative electrode localization. A well-chosen anesthetic strategy can enhance the efficacy of electrode placement by minimizing patient movement and preserving critical neurophysiological signals for real-time monitoring. This precise targeting enhances safety via a reduction in perioperative risks and an improvement in long-term seizure control. Anesthetic considerations in epilepsy patients differ from those in movement disorders due to variations in their nuclei targets during DBS. Despite the increasing use of DBS for epilepsy following its FDA approval in 2018, research on anesthetic effects specific to this population remains limited. This narrative review, therefore, examines anesthetic approaches, pharmacological implications, potential complications, and evolving methods for DBS implantation in epilepsy patients, highlighting new insights and unique considerations in this population. Understanding these factors is essential for optimizing surgical outcomes and improving the safety and efficacy of DBS in epilepsy treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Basis and Novel Treatment of Epilepsy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 580 KiB  
Case Report
Management of Phantom Limb Pain through Thalamotomy of the Centro-Median Nucleus
by Ramiro A. Pérez de la Torre, Job J. Rodríguez Hernández, Ali Al-Ramadan and Abeer Gharaibeh
Neurol. Int. 2021, 13(4), 587-593; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint13040058 - 10 Nov 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3099
Abstract
Background: Phantom limb syndrome is defined as the perception of intense pain or other sensations that are secondary to a neural lesion in a limb that does not exist. It can be treated using pharmacological and surgical interventions. Most medications are prescribed to [...] Read more.
Background: Phantom limb syndrome is defined as the perception of intense pain or other sensations that are secondary to a neural lesion in a limb that does not exist. It can be treated using pharmacological and surgical interventions. Most medications are prescribed to improve patients’ lives; however, the response rate is low. In this case report, we present a case of phantom limb syndrome in a 42-year-old female with a history of transradial amputation of the left thoracic limb due to an accidental compression one year before. The patient underwent placement of a deep brain stimulator at the ventral posteromedial nucleus (VPM) on the right side and removal secondary to loss of battery. The patient continued to have a burning pain throughout the limb with a sensation of still having the limb, which was subsequently diagnosed as phantom limb syndrome. After a thorough discussion with the patient, a right stereotactic centro-median thalamotomy was offered. An immediate response was reported with a reduction in pain severity on the visual analogue scale (VAS) from a value of 9–10 preoperative to a value of 2 postoperative, with no postoperative complications. Although phantom limb pain is one of the most difficult to treat conditions, centro-median thalamotomy may provide an effective stereotactic treatment procedure with adequate outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4451 KiB  
Article
Centromedian–Parafascicular and Somatosensory Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Contemporary Series of 40 Patients
by Mahmoud Abdallat, Assel Saryyeva, Christian Blahak, Marc E. Wolf, Ralf Weigel, Thomas J. Loher, Joachim Runge, Hans E. Heissler, Thomas M. Kinfe and Joachim K. Krauss
Biomedicines 2021, 9(7), 731; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9070731 - 25 Jun 2021
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 4186
Abstract
Introduction: The treatment of neuropathic and central pain still remains a major challenge. Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) involving various target structures is a therapeutic option which has received increased re-interest. Beneficial results have been reported in several more recent smaller studies, however, [...] Read more.
Introduction: The treatment of neuropathic and central pain still remains a major challenge. Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) involving various target structures is a therapeutic option which has received increased re-interest. Beneficial results have been reported in several more recent smaller studies, however, there is a lack of prospective studies on larger series providing long term outcomes. Methods: Forty patients with refractory neuropathic and central pain syndromes underwent stereotactic bifocal implantation of DBS electrodes in the centromedian–parafascicular (CM–Pf) and the ventroposterolateral (VPL) or ventroposteromedial (VPM) nucleus contralateral to the side of pain. Electrodes were externalized for test stimulation for several days. Outcome was assessed with five specific VAS pain scores (maximum, minimum, average pain, pain at presentation, allodynia). Results: The mean age at surgery was 53.5 years, and the mean duration of pain was 8.2 years. During test stimulation significant reductions of all five pain scores was achieved with either CM–Pf or VPL/VPM stimulation. Pacemakers were implanted in 33/40 patients for chronic stimulation for whom a mean follow-up of 62.8 months (range 3–180 months) was available. Of these, 18 patients had a follow-up beyond four years. Hardware related complications requiring secondary surgeries occurred in 11/33 patients. The VAS maximum pain score was improved by ≥50% in 8/18, and by ≥30% in 11/18 on long term follow-up beyond four years, and the VAS average pain score by ≥50% in 10/18, and by ≥30% in 16/18. On a group level, changes in pain scores remained statistically significant over time, however, there was no difference when comparing the efficacy of CM–Pf versus VPL/VPM stimulation. The best results were achieved in patients with facial pain, poststroke/central pain (except thalamic pain), or brachial plexus injury, while patients with thalamic lesions had the least benefit. Conclusion: Thalamic DBS is a useful treatment option in selected patients with severe and medically refractory pain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neuropathic Pain: Therapy and Mechanisms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1476 KiB  
Article
Connectivity Patterns of Deep Brain Stimulation Targets in Patients with Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome
by Petra Heiden, Mauritius Hoevels, Dilruba Bayram, Juan C. Baldermann, Thomas Schüller, Daniel Huys, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle and Pablo Andrade
Brain Sci. 2021, 11(1), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010087 - 11 Jan 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 6150
Abstract
Since 1999, several targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) have emerged showing similar success rates. Studies using different tractography techniques have identified connectivity profiles associated with a better outcome for individual targets. However, GTS patients might [...] Read more.
Since 1999, several targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) have emerged showing similar success rates. Studies using different tractography techniques have identified connectivity profiles associated with a better outcome for individual targets. However, GTS patients might need individualized therapy. The objective of this study is to analyze the connectivity profile of different DBS targets for GTS. We identified standard target coordinates for the centromedian nucleus/nucleus ventro-oralis internus (CM/Voi), the CM/parafascicular (CM-Pf) complex, the anteromedial globus pallidus internus (amGPi), the posteroventral GPi (pvGPi), the ventral anterior/ventrolateral thalamus (VA/VL), and the nucleus accumbens/anterior limb of the internal capsule (Nacc/ALIC). Probabilistic tractography was performed from the targets to different limbic and motor areas based on patient-specific imaging and a normative connectome (HCP). Our analysis showed significant differences between the connectivity profiles of standard DBS targets (p < 0.05). Among all targets, the pvGPi showed the strongest connection to the sensorimotor cortex, while the amGPi showed the strongest connection to the prefrontal cortex in patient-specific imaging. Differences were observed between the connectivity profiles when using probabilistic tractography based on patient data and HCP. Our findings showed that the connectivity profiles of different DBS targets to major motor and limbic areas differ significantly. In the future, these differences may be considered when planning DBS for GTS patients employing an individualized approach. There were compelling differences in connectivity profiles when using different tractography techniques. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deep Brain Stimulation and Tourette Syndrome)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 4585 KiB  
Article
Features of Action Potentials from Identified Thalamic Nuclei in Anesthetized Patients
by Jesús Pastor and Lorena Vega-Zelaya
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(12), 1002; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10121002 - 17 Dec 2020
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2984
Abstract
Our objective was to describe the electrophysiological properties of the extracellular action potential (AP) picked up through microelectrode recordings (MERs). Five patients were operated under general anesthesia for centromedian deep brain stimulation (DBS). APs from the same cell were pooled to obtain a [...] Read more.
Our objective was to describe the electrophysiological properties of the extracellular action potential (AP) picked up through microelectrode recordings (MERs). Five patients were operated under general anesthesia for centromedian deep brain stimulation (DBS). APs from the same cell were pooled to obtain a mean AP (mAP). The amplitudes and durations for all 2/3 phases were computed from the mAP, together with the maximum (dVmax) and minimum (dVmin) values of the first derivative, as well as the slopes of different phases during repolarization. The mAPs are denominated according to the phase polarity (P/N for positive/negative). We obtained a total of 1109 mAPs, most of the positive (98.47%) and triphasic (93.69%) with a small P/N deflection (Vphase1) before depolarization. The percentage of the different types of mAPs was different for the nuclei addressed. The relationship between dVmax and the depolarizing phase is specific. The descending phase of the first derivative identified different phases during the repolarizing period. We observed a high correlation between Vphase1 and the amplitudes of either depolarization or repolarization phases. Human thalamic nuclei differ in their electrophysiological properties of APs, even under general anesthesia. Capacitive current, which is probably responsible for Vphase1, is very common in thalamic APs. Moreover, subtle differences during repolarization are neuron-specific. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 931 KiB  
Article
Deep Brain Stimulation for Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome: Toward Limbic Targets
by Domenico Servello, Tommaso Francesco Galbiati, Roberta Balestrino, Guglielmo Iess, Edvin Zekaj, Sara De Michele and Mauro Porta
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(5), 301; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10050301 - 15 May 2020
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4204
Abstract
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by tics and, frequently, psychiatric and behavioral comorbidities. Above all, obsessive compulsive disorder/behavior (OCD/OCB) influences the clinical picture and has a severe impact on quality of life, eventually more than the [...] Read more.
Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by tics and, frequently, psychiatric and behavioral comorbidities. Above all, obsessive compulsive disorder/behavior (OCD/OCB) influences the clinical picture and has a severe impact on quality of life, eventually more than the tics themselves. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy in selected, refractory cases. Clinical response to DBS may vary according to the clinical picture, comorbidities, and to the anatomical target. This retrospective study compares the results obtained from DBS in the ventralis oralis/centromedian-parascicular nucleus of the thalamus (Voi-Cm/Pf) (41 patients) and antero-medial Globus Pallidus internus (am-GPi) (14 patients), evaluating clinical response over time by means of Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and Yale–Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) scores over a period of 48 months. A significant and stable improvement in the YGTSS and YBOCS has been obtained in both groups (p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in YBOCS improvement over time between the am-GPi group and the Voi-Cm/Pf group, indicating a better and faster control of OCD/OCB symptoms in the former group. The ratio of hardware removal was 23% and limited to 13 patients in the Voi-Cm/Pf group. These results confirm that DBS is an effective therapy in treating GTS and suggest that the am-GPi might be superior to Voi-Cm/Pf in alleviating comorbid OCD/OCB. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deep Brain Stimulation and Tourette Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 6348 KiB  
Article
Modulation of Fibers to Motor Cortex during Thalamic DBS in Tourette Patients Correlates with Tic Reduction
by Pablo Andrade, Petra Heiden, Moritz Hoevels, Marc Schlamann, Juan C. Baldermann, Daniel Huys and Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(5), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10050302 - 15 May 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4022
Abstract
Probabilistic tractography in Tourette syndrome (TS) patients have shown an alteration in the connectivity of the primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area with the striatum and thalamus, suggesting an abnormal connectivity of the cortico-striatum-thalamocortical-pathways in TS. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the [...] Read more.
Probabilistic tractography in Tourette syndrome (TS) patients have shown an alteration in the connectivity of the primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area with the striatum and thalamus, suggesting an abnormal connectivity of the cortico-striatum-thalamocortical-pathways in TS. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian nucleus–nucleus ventrooralis internus (CM-Voi complex) in the thalamus is an effective treatment for refractory TS patients. We investigated the connectivity of activated fibers from CM-Voi to the motor cortex and its correlation between these projections and their clinical outcome. Seven patients with TS underwent CM-Voi-DBS surgery and were clinically evaluated preoperatively and six months postoperatively. We performed diffusion tensor imaging to display the activated fibers projecting from the CM-Voi to the different motor cortex regions of interest. These analyses showed that the extent of tic reduction during DBS is associated with the degree of stimulation-dependent connectivity between CM-Voi and the motor cortex, and in particular, an increased density of projections to the presupplementary motor area (preSMA). Non-responder patients displayed the largest amount of active fibers projecting into cortical areas other than motor cortex compared to responder patients. These findings support the notion that an abnormal connectivity of thalamocortical pathways underlies TS, and that modulation of these circuits through DBS could restore the function and reduce symptoms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Deep Brain Stimulation and Tourette Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3336 KiB  
Article
Neurophysiological Characterization of Thalamic Nuclei in Epileptic Anaesthetized Patients
by Lorena Vega-Zelaya, Cristina V. Torres, Marta Navas and Jesús Pastor
Brain Sci. 2019, 9(11), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9110312 - 7 Nov 2019
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3152
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires precise localization, which is especially difficult at the thalamus, and even more difficult in anesthetized patients. We aimed to characterize the neurophysiological properties of the ventral intermediate (V.im), ventral caudal (V.c), and centromedian parvo (Ce.pc) and the magnocellular [...] Read more.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires precise localization, which is especially difficult at the thalamus, and even more difficult in anesthetized patients. We aimed to characterize the neurophysiological properties of the ventral intermediate (V.im), ventral caudal (V.c), and centromedian parvo (Ce.pc) and the magnocellular (Ce.mc) thalamic nuclei. We obtained microelectrode recordings from five patients with refractory epilepsy under general anesthesia. Somatosensory evoked potentials recorded by microelectrodes were used to identify the V.c nucleus. Trajectories were reconstructed off-line to identify the nucleus recorded, and the amplitude of the action potential (AP) and the tonic (i.e., mean frequency, density, probability of interspike interval) and phasic (i.e., burst index, pause index, and pause ratio) properties of the pattern discharges were analyzed. The Mahalanobis metric was used to evaluate the similarity of the patterns. The mean AP amplitude was higher for the V.im nucleus (172.7 ± 7.6 µV) than for the other nuclei, and the mean frequency was lower for the Ce.pc nucleus (7.2 ± 0.8 Hz) and higher for the V.c nucleus (11.9 ± 0.8 Hz) than for the other nuclei. The phasic properties showed a bursting pattern for the V.c nucleus and a tonic pattern for the centromedian and V.im nuclei. The Mahalanobis distance was the shortest for the V.im/V.c and Ce.mp/Ce.pc pairs. Therefore, the different properties of the thalamic nuclei, even for patients under general anesthesia, can be used to positively define the recorded structure, improving the exactness of electrode placement in DBS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurophysiological Techniques for Epilepsy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1400 KiB  
Article
Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS) for Tourette Syndrome
by Sara Marceglia, Manuela Rosa, Domenico Servello, Mauro Porta, Sergio Barbieri, Elena Moro and Alberto Priori
Brain Sci. 2018, 8(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8010004 - 23 Dec 2017
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 7357
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a novel therapy for the treatment of several movement and neuropsychiatric disorders, and may also be suitable for the treatment of Tourette syndrome (TS). The main DBS targets used to date in patients with TS are [...] Read more.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a novel therapy for the treatment of several movement and neuropsychiatric disorders, and may also be suitable for the treatment of Tourette syndrome (TS). The main DBS targets used to date in patients with TS are located within the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuit involved in the pathophysiology of this syndrome. They include the ventralis oralis/centromedian-parafascicular (Vo/CM-Pf) nucleus of the thalamus and the nucleus accumbens. Current DBS treatments deliver continuous electrical stimulation and are not designed to adapt to the patient’s symptoms, thereby contributing to unwanted side effects. Moreover, continuous DBS can lead to rapid battery depletion, which necessitates frequent battery replacement surgeries. Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS), which is controlled based on neurophysiological biomarkers, is considered one of the most promising approaches to optimize clinical benefits and to limit the side effects of DBS. aDBS consists of a closed-loop system designed to measure and analyse a control variable reflecting the patient’s clinical condition and to modify on-line stimulation settings to improve treatment efficacy. Local field potentials (LFPs), which are sums of pre- and post-synaptic activity arising from large neuronal populations, directly recorded from electrodes implanted for DBS can theoretically represent a reliable correlate of clinical status in patients with TS. The well-established LFP-clinical correlations in patients with Parkinson’s disease reported in the last few years provide the rationale for developing and implementing new aDBS devices whose efficacies are under evaluation in humans. Only a few studies have investigated LFP activity recorded from DBS target structures and the relationship of this activity to clinical symptoms in TS. Here, we review the available literature supporting the feasibility of an LFP-based aDBS approach in patients with TS. In addition, to increase such knowledge, we report explorative findings regarding LFP data recently acquired and analysed in patients with TS after DBS electrode implantation at rest, during voluntary and involuntary movements (tics), and during ongoing DBS. Data available up to now suggest that patients with TS have oscillatory patterns specifically associated with the part of the brain they are recorded from, and thereby with clinical manifestations. The Vo/CM-Pf nucleus of the thalamus is involved in movement execution and the pathophysiology of TS. Moreover, the oscillatory patterns in TS are specifically modulated by DBS treatment, as reflected by improvements in TS symptoms. These findings suggest that LFPs recorded from DBS targets may be used to control new aDBS devices capable of adaptive stimulation responsive to the symptoms of TS. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cerebral Etiology and Treatment of the Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop