Search Results (40)

This study presents and discusses evidence on the value of biomarker testing and precision medicine in Latin America through a health equity lens. It is essential to explore how to harness the benefits of precision medicine to narrow the health equity gap, ensuring all patients have access to the best cancer treatment. The methodology employed to develop this document consists of a non-systematic literature review, followed by a process of validation and feedback with a group of experts in relevant fields. Precision medicine could help reduce health inequities in Latin America by providing better diagnosis and treatment for everyone with cancer. However, its success in achieving this depends on the implementation of policies that promote equitable access. Findings indicate that the current policy landscape in the Latin American region is not conducive to improving access, reach, quality, or outcome-related problems in cancer care, nor to realizing the full potential of precision medicine. The study explores how precision medicine can advance health equity, concluding with an analysis of the challenges and recommendations for overcoming them. Full article

Background: The identification of pathogenic variants in the Breast Cancer Genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) is a critical predictive biomarker for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The aim of this study is to define real-world rates and determinants of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 testing and subsequent PARPi utilisation in Australia using a national clinical quality registry. Methods: This multi-centre cohort study analysed data from 1503 women with non-mucinous EOC diagnosed between May 2017 and July 2022, captured by the Australian National Gynae-Oncology Registry (NGOR). We evaluated rates of germline and somatic testing and PARPi use, using multivariate logistic regression to identify associated clinical and demographic factors. Results: Overall germline and somatic testing rates were 68% and 32%, respectively. For the high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cohort, rates were higher, at 78% and 39%, respectively. Germline testing was significantly less likely for women aged >80 years (OR 0.49), those in regional areas (OR 0.61), and those receiving single-modality treatment. Somatic testing uptake increased significantly following public reimbursement for PARPi (p = 0.004). Among eligible women with a newly diagnosed BRCA pathogenic variant and advanced disease (n = 110), 52% commenced first-line maintenance PARPi. Conclusions: This national study offers valuable insights into Australian ovarian cancer care, highlighting opportunities to enhance testing equity for older women (aged >80) and regional patients. Furthermore, it identifies the translation of a positive test into PARPi therapy as a complex area that warrants further collaborative investigation to optimise patient outcomes. Full article

Social adversity is linked to poorer physical health in breast cancer survivors, highlighting the urgency of addressing health equity. Simultaneously, identifying individual-level factors that mitigate these effects may provide more immediate relief for survivors. This study examined whether four modifiable psychosocial factors—emotion dysregulation, physical activity, sleep disturbance, and social support—moderate the relationship between place-based social adversity and physical health in 255 breast cancer survivors (Mage = 56.03, 74.5% non-Hispanic White) within six months post-treatment. Linear regression analyses with 5000 bootstrapped estimates revealed that sleep disturbance significantly moderated the relationship between place-based social adversity and physical health (B = −0.014, SE = 0.001, bootstrapped 95% CI = −0.027, −0.001). Specifically, greater place-based social adversity was associated with poorer physical health at high levels of sleep disturbance (B = −0.22, p = 0.004), but not at low (B = 0.01, p = 0.94) or average (B = −0.10, p = 0.07) levels. Emotion dysregulation, physical activity, and social support did not moderate this relationship. Findings suggest that improving sleep quality may buffer the negative impact of social adversity on physical health, identifying sleep as a potential target for interventions aimed at reducing disparities among breast cancer survivors. Full article

Precision medicine transforms healthcare by tailoring prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies to individual characteristics such as genetics, molecular profiles, environmental factors, and lifestyle. This approach has shown promise in improving treatment efficacy, minimizing adverse effects, and enhancing disease prevention across various conditions, including age-related illnesses, cancer, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and rare genetic disorders. However, major challenges remain that limit the potential of precision medicine. A key limitation is the underrepresentation of diverse populations in genetic research, leading to disparities in treatment outcomes and the potential misinterpretation of genetic risks. Current clinical reference intervals often fail to reflect the biological changes associated with aging, increasing the risk of misdiagnosis or inappropriate treatment in older adults. Our model calls for a broader, more inclusive framework, one that incorporates not only individual variability but also population-level factors such as aging and genetic diversity. Emerging technologies in artificial intelligence (AI), digital health, and multi-omics can help support this expanded approach. Precision medicine must include underrepresented populations in research, develop age-specific clinical guidelines, and address socioeconomic barriers. Here, we provide a brief introduction to our model. By integrating aging and genetics, precision medicine can evolve into a truly global approach—one that promotes health equity, respects biological diversity, and improves outcomes for all populations. Full article

Cancer research faces significant biological, technological, and systemic limitations that hinder the development of effective therapies and improved patient outcomes. Traditional preclinical models, such as 2D and 3D cell cultures, murine xenografts, and organoids, often fail to reflect the complexity of human tumor architecture, microenvironment, and immune interactions. This discrepancy results in promising laboratory findings not always translating effectively into clinical success. A core obstacle is tumor heterogeneity, characterized by diverse genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic variations within tumors, which complicates treatment strategies and contributes to drug resistance. Hereditary malignancies and cancer stem cells contribute strongly to generating this complex panorama. Current early detection technologies lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity, impeding timely diagnosis. The tumor microenvironment, with its intricate interactions and resistance-promoting factors, further promotes treatment failure. Additionally, we only partially understand the biological processes driving metastasis, limiting therapeutic advances. Overcoming these barriers involves not only the use of new methodological approaches and advanced technologies, but also requires a cultural effort by researchers. Many cancer studies are still essentially observational. While acknowledging their significance, it is crucial to recognize the shift from deterministic to indeterministic paradigms in biomedicine over the past two to three decades, a transition facilitated by systems biology. It has opened the doors of deep metabolism where the functional processes that control and regulate cancer progression operate. Beyond biological barriers, systemic challenges include limited funding, regulatory complexities, and disparities in cancer care access across different populations. These socio-economic factors exacerbate research stagnation and hinder the translation of scientific innovations into clinical practice. Overcoming these obstacles requires multidisciplinary collaborations, advanced modeling techniques that better emulate human cancer, and innovative technologies for early detection and targeted therapy. Strategic policy initiatives must address systemic barriers, promoting health equity and sustainable research funding. While the complexity of cancer biology and systemic challenges are formidable, ongoing scientific progress and collaborative efforts inspire hope for breakthroughs that can transform cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes worldwide. Full article

Healthcare disparities in cancer care remain pervasive, driven by intersecting socioeconomic, racial, and insurance-related inequities. These disparities manifest in various forms such as limited access to medical resources, underrepresentation in clinical trials, and worse cancer outcomes for marginalized groups, including low-income individuals, racial minorities, and those with inadequate insurance coverage, who face significant barriers in accessing comprehensive cancer care. This manuscript explores the multifaceted nature of these disparities, examining the roles of socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, and insurance status in influencing cancer care access and outcomes. Historical and contemporary data highlight that minority racial status correlates with reduced clinical trial participation and increased cancer-related mortality. Barriers such as insurance coverage, health literacy, and language further hinder access to cancer treatments. Addressing these disparities requires a systemic approach that includes regulatory reforms, policy changes, educational initiatives, and innovative trial and treatment designs. This manuscript emphasizes the need for comprehensive interventions targeting biomedicine, socio-demographics, and social characteristics to mitigate these inequities. By understanding the underlying causes and implementing targeted strategies, we can work towards a more equitable healthcare system. This involves improving access to high-quality care, increasing participation in research, and addressing social determinants of health. This manuscript concludes with policy recommendations and future directions to achieve health equity in cancer care, ensuring optimal outcomes for all patients. Full article

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death in the US and worldwide. Recent advances in molecular profiling and targeted therapies have revolutionized the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in oncogene-driven subtypes. These therapies selectively target key molecular alterations in EGFR, ALK, KRAS, ROS1, MET, RET, ERBB2 (HER2), BRAF V600E, and NTRK, resulting in substantial improvements in survival rates and quality of life for lung cancer patients. However, disparities in molecular diagnostics and precision treatments persist, disproportionately affecting minority patients. These inequities include underrepresentation in clinical trials, disparities in molecular testing, and barriers to treatment access. The limited participation of racial and ethnic minorities in landmark clinical trials raises concerns about the generalizability of findings and their applicability to diverse populations. In this review, we examine the current landscape of molecular diagnosis and precision medicine in minority patients with oncogene-driven lung cancer, highlighting challenges, opportunities, and future directions for achieving equity in precision oncology. Additionally, we discuss differences in the prevalence of oncologic driver mutations across populations and emphasize the urgent need for greater diversity in clinical research. Addressing these gaps is critical to improving survival outcomes and ensuring equitable access to personalized lung cancer care for all patients. Full article

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a leading cause of several cancers, most notably cervical cancer, but also anal, penile, vulvar, vaginal, and oropharyngeal malignancies. While vaccines and screening technologies offer highly effective prevention, the global burden of HPV-induced cancers remains disproportionately high in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This literature review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the types, mechanisms, treatments, and prevention strategies associated with HPV-related cancers, while also highlighting regional disparities in healthcare access and infrastructure. It critically examines the barriers LMICs face in adopting life-saving interventions, such as limited healthcare infrastructure, vaccine hesitancy, funding gaps, and cultural stigma. The review further explores recent scientific and policy advances—including single-dose vaccination, self-sampling HPV tests, and senolytic therapies—that have the potential to reduce global health inequities. By connecting molecular biology with public health systems, this paper underscores the need for interdisciplinary solutions and equity-centered approaches to combat HPV-induced cancers worldwide. The findings emphasize that eliminating cervical cancer and other HPV-related diseases is not only a scientific goal but also a moral imperative requiring global collaboration and local action. Full article

Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States, which disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minorities. Disparities in lung cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes are due to a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors, structural racism, and limited access to high-quality care. This review aims to examine the underlying causes of these disparities and explore potential mitigation strategies to improve lung cancer care equity. Methods: A review of the literature was conducted, evaluating racial and ethnic disparities in lung cancer care. Disparities in lung cancer screening, genomic testing, surgical and systemic treatment, and survival were explored. Additionally, interventional strategies such as risk-based screening, patient navigation programs, and policy reforms were examined. Results: Racial and ethnic minority patients are diagnosed at younger ages with fewer pack-years yet are less likely to qualify for screening under current guidelines. They receive lower rates of guideline-concordant treatment, including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and biomarker testing, and have reduced access to specialty care. Socioeconomic barriers, medical mistrust, and geographic disparities further contribute to these inequities. Targeted interventions, including mobile screening programs, financial assistance initiatives, and culturally competent care, have shown promise in improving lung cancer outcomes. Conclusion: A multi-level approach, incorporating healthcare policy changes, improved screening criteria, and an enhanced community engagement strategy, is essential for achieving equitable lung cancer care, ultimately improving outcomes for racial minority populations. Full article

Background: Personalized cancer medicine (PCM) tailors cancer treatments based on individual genetic profiles, enabling more precise and effective therapies. Despite its potential, integrating PCM into clinical practice remains challenging because of organizational and systemic barriers. This study examined the factors influencing PCM implementation at a major cancer center in Stockholm, Sweden. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 medical professionals and management staff from Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet. Content analysis was used to identify key themes related to PCM implementation. This study followed the established Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines to ensure methodological rigor and transparency. Results: Informants framed PCM as both a technological innovation and a patient-centered approach. However, significant barriers to implementation were identified, including organizational inertia, fragmented funding models, and ethical challenges related to access and equity. Structural silos between academic and healthcare institutions complicate integration. Key facilitators include leadership commitment, cross-sectoral collaboration, and a supportive policy environment. Participants emphasized the need for integrated infrastructure, real-time data-sharing mechanisms, and interdisciplinary training programs to support PCM. Conclusions: Successful PCM implementation requires overcoming entrenched organizational and systemic barriers through a multi-stakeholder approach involving healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers, and patient advocates. The findings underscore the necessity of a “third-form organization” to mediate between academia and clinical care. Addressing these challenges requires adaptive governance models, evidence-based policy reforms, and sustainable funding frameworks. Future research should explore comparative contexts to enhance the scalability and generalizability of PCM integration strategies. Full article

Precision medicine has revolutionised targeted cancer treatments; however, its implementation in ovarian cancer remains challenging. Diverse tumour biology and extensive heterogeneity in ovarian cancer can limit the translatability of genetic profiling and contribute to a lack of biomarkers of treatment response. This review addresses the barriers in precision medicine for ovarian cancer, including obtaining adequate and representative tissue samples for analysis, developing functional and standardised screening methods, and navigating data infrastructure and management. Ethical concerns related to patient consent, data privacy and health equity are also explored. We highlight the socio-economic complexities for precision medicine and propose strategies to overcome these challenges with an emphasis on accessibility and education amongst patients and health professionals and the development of regulatory frameworks to support clinical integration. Interdisciplinary collaboration is essential to drive progress in precision medicine to improve disease management and ovarian cancer patient outcomes. Full article

Background: Penile squamous cell carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with significant physical and psychological impacts. Socioeconomic factors influence prognosis in genitourinary cancers, making the investigation of insurance status critical for reducing cancer burden and promoting health equity. Materials and Methods: Men diagnosed with primary penile squamous cell carcinoma from 2007 to 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) national database. Participants were categorized based on insurance status: privately insured, Medicaid, and uninsured. Pearson’s chi-squared test assessed the distribution of observed frequencies between the patient demographics, socioeconomic status, tumor characteristics, and surgical variables across the insurance groups. Overall and cancer-specific survival was estimated using a multivariate Cox hazards proportional model analysis. Results: The multivariate Cox hazards proportional model showed that, compared to privately insured patients, Medicaid patients had an increased risk for overall death (hazard ratio [HR] = HR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.12–2.07). For cancer-specific mortality, Medicaid patients had an increased risk of death compared to privately insured patients (HR 1.58; 95% CI, 1.11–2.25). Conclusions: Medicaid does not mitigate the differences caused by health insurance status due to health insurance disparities for overall or cancer-specific mortality. Lower Medicaid reimbursements and out-of-pocket costs lead to a narrow network of physicians, hospitals, and treatment modalities that compromise health equity. Increasing awareness of health insurance disparities and improving access to care via a clinician–community–governmental partnership can potentially lead to improved predictive outcomes. Full article

Health disparities in urologic oncology, particularly in prostate, bladder, kidney, and testicular cancers, significantly impact patient outcomes across different demographic groups. This narrative review aims to investigate the extent and drivers of these disparities, focusing on the influence of race, socioeconomic status, and geographic location on diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive review of the existing literature and analyzed data from national cancer databases to identify patterns of inequity. Our findings reveal that minority populations, individuals with lower socioeconomic status, and those residing in underserved areas are less likely to receive timely and guideline-based care, leading to worse outcomes. This review underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions, including policy reforms, health system restructuring, enhanced community outreach, and increased funding for disparity-focused research, to ensure equitable access to high-quality oncologic care. Addressing these disparities is crucial for improving cancer outcomes and achieving health equity in urologic oncology. Full article

Cervical cancer is highly preventable through vaccination, early detection, and treatment, yet is the fourth most common cancer globally. HPV testing is superior to cytology for the detection of cervical pre-cancer, and jurisdictions around the world are implementing HPV primary screening, which offers the opportunity for self-screening, an important self-care intervention. Digital health solutions are also increasingly important components of self-care. In this study, we assessed the acceptability and completion of self-screening for cervical cancer offered through a digital platform within a low screening uptake region of British Columbia. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of self-screening for cervical cancer offered through a digital platform as measured by return rates of self-screening kits. Patients due or overdue for cervix screening were invited to participate. Eligible participants registered online to receive a self-screening kit, which included a device for vaginal self-screening, instructions, and a return envelope, sent to their home. After self-screening using the vaginal device, HPV testing was conducted. HPV-negative participants were returned to routine screening, and HPV-positive participants were recommended for cytology or colposcopy. Attendance rates at follow-up were evaluated. Participants were invited to complete an acceptability survey. From April 2019 to December 2023, 283 participants were sent kits, with 207 kits returned for a completion rate of 73%. Of valid samples (n = 202), 15 were HPV positive, and 93% attended follow-up care. Most respondents found the CervixCheck website easy to use, informative, and secure and were satisfied with receiving their results online. CervixCheck had a high completion rate among participants who were sent a self-screening kit. High compliance with recommended follow-up and high acceptability of self-screening for cervical cancer was observed. Most participants indicated they would self-screen again in the future. Innovative approaches to cervical screening, including self-screening and the use of digital health interventions, are ways to enhance equity and improve uptake of cervical screening. Full article

As the number of people living with cancer increases, it is important to understand how people can live well with and after cancer. First Nations people diagnosed with cancer in Australia experience survival disparities relating to health service accessibility and a lack of understanding of cultural needs and lived experiences. This study aimed to amplify the voices of First Nations individuals impacted by cancer and advance the development of a culturally informed care pathway. Indigenist research methodology guided the relational and transformative approach of this study. Participants included varied cancer experts, including First Nations people living well with and after cancer, health professionals, researchers, and policy makers. Data were collected through online Yarning circles and analysed according to an inductive thematic approach. The experience of First Nations people living well with and after cancer is inextricably connected with family. The overall themes encompass hope, family, and culture and the four priority areas included the following: strength-based understanding of cancer, cancer information, access to healthcare and support, and holistic cancer services. Respect for culture is interwoven throughout. Models of survivorship care need to integrate family-centred cancer care to holistically support First Nations people throughout and beyond their cancer journey. Full article