Search Results (8)

Background/Objectives: Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) is an increasingly popular surgical approach for prostate enucleation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of perioperative and delayed complications following RASP and the medium- to long-term urinary function outcomes. Methods: This is a multi-centre retrospective chart analysis of patients who underwent RASP between October 2016 and October 2022. Surgery was performed using a transvesical approach with a DaVinci Xi system. Patients were reviewed pre- and postoperatively at six weeks and annually thereafter. Patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, pre- and postoperative uroflowmetry and post-void residual (PVR) measurement were assessed. Results: A total of 50 patients with mean preoperative prostate volume of 180.3 ± 48.1 underwent RASP. The mean operative time was 140.7 ± 28.7 min and hospital length of stay was 5.2 ± 2.9 days. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 247.4 ± 153.7 mL and no patients required transfusion. The mean follow-up period was 37.2 ± 18.3 months. No patients developed stress urinary incontinence. Two patients developed delayed bladder neck contracture at 44 and 63 months. There was a significant improvement in peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) (preop Qmax 10.7 mL/s vs. postop Qmax 24.2 mL/s, p < 0.05) and PVR (preop PVR 366.5 mL vs. postop PVR 42.2 mL, p < 0.05). All patients were weaned off medical therapy for benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) and no patients had recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms requiring re-operation. Conclusions: RASP is a safe and effective enucleation technique for large prostates >100 mL with excellent long-term durability of urinary function outcomes beyond 36 months. Full article

Background and Objectives: Aquablation, a robot-assisted, heat-free resection technique, has emerged as a promising minimally invasive surgical therapy (MIST) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Its precision and potential for preservation of sexual function distinguish it from traditional surgical options. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety profile of Aquablation, with emphasis on perioperative complications and functional outcomes. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through June 2025 in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO CRD420251074479). Eligible studies included randomized and non-randomized trials of Aquablation in men with BPH, reporting adverse events by type, frequency, or severity. Risk of bias was assessed with ROB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Results: Forty-seven studies were included, spanning randomized controlled and prospective observational designs. Most complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo grade 1–2). Bleeding was the most frequent perioperative event, with transfusion required in 1–8% of cases, more often in large prostates. Severe complications (grade ≥ 3) were uncommon and usually related to bleeding or urinary retention. Long-term sequelae such as strictures or bladder neck contracture were rare. Compared with transurethral resection of the prostate, Aquablation yielded lower rates of ejaculatory dysfunction (10% vs. 36%), with continence and erectile function largely preserved. Outcomes were comparable to holmium laser enucleation, but Aquablation demonstrated superior ejaculatory preservation. Conclusions: Aquablation demonstrates a favorable safety profile across prostate sizes, with its greatest advantage being preservation of sexual function. While bleeding remains the principal perioperative concern, life-threatening events are rare. Further independent, long-term comparative studies are warranted. Full article

Background: Urethral strictures and bladder neck contractures (BNCs) can be significantly morbid for patients and may require intervention for effective urinary drainage. We hypothesized patients with abnormal scarring disorders, such as keloids or hypertrophic scars, are at elevated risks of urethroplasty failure as well as postprocedural urethral strictures and BNCs. Methods: We queried the TriNetX database to determine the risk of urethroplasty failure for patients with abnormal scarring disorders compared to controls. We also investigated the risk of developing urethral strictures and BNCs for patients undergoing various endourology procedures. Results are reported in terms of risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical significance was considered when the CI did not include 1.0. Propensity score matching was performed to limit confounding. Notably, TriNetX rounds values < 10 to 10 for patient anonymity (denoted by *). Results: Urethroplasty patients with scarring pathology needed a second procedure more than twice as often (36.2% vs. <17.2%*, RR = 2.1, 95%CI 1.1–4.1). Following cystoscopy, there was no difference in urethral stricture rates for patients with scarring disorders (2.7% vs. 2.6%, RR = 1.1, 95%CI 0.85–1.3). These patients also showed similar rates of BNCs (7.5% vs. 5.3%, RR = 1.4, 95%CI 0.84–2.3) and urethral strictures (5.9% vs. 5.3%, RR = 1.1, 95%CI 0.68–1.8) after transurethral bladder outlet procedures. Conclusions: Patients with scarring disorders showed much higher urethroplasty failure rates. They experienced similar rates of urethral strictures and BNC formation after endoscopic procedures. These novel findings underscore the importance of recognizing abnormal scarring conditions during preoperative assessments, guiding clinicians in counseling patients and tailoring operative interventions. Full article

Bladder neck contracture (BNC) is a complication of the surgical treatment of benign and malignant prostate conditions and is associated with the partial or complete blockage of urination. Correction of this condition usually requires repeated surgical intervention, which does not guarantee recovery. Balloon dilation is a minimally invasive alternative to the surgical dissection of tissues; however, it significantly reduces the patient’s quality of life. Additional local anti-inflammatory treatment may reduce the number of procedures requested and increase the attractiveness of this therapeutic strategy. Here, we report about an ultrathin biocompatible coating based on polylactic acid for Foley catheter balloons that can provide localized release of Prednol-L in the range of 56–99 µg in the BNC zone under conventional diagnostic ultrasound exposure. Note that the exposure of a transrectal probe with a conventional gray-scale ultrasound regimen with and without shear wave elastography (SWE) was comparably effective for Prednol-L release from the coating surface of a Foley catheter balloon. This strategy does not require additional manipulations by clinicians. The trigger for the drug release is the ultrasound exposure, which is applied for visualization of the balloon’s location during the dilation process. In vivo experiments demonstrated the absence of negative effects of the usage of a coated Foley catheter for balloon dilation of the bladder neck and urethra. Full article

(1) Background: Male stress incontinence in patients with previously treated urethral or bladder neck stricture is a therapeutic challenge. The efficacy and safety of the adjustable trans-obturator male system (ATOMS) in these patients is unknown. (2) Methods: All patients with primary ATOMS implants in our institution between 2014 and 2021 were included. The outcomes of patients with previously treated urethral or bladder neck stricture (≥6 months before ATOMS implant) and stable 16Ch urethral caliber were compared to those without a history of stricture. The primary endpoint was the dry patient rate, defined as the pad test ≤ 20 mL/day, and complication rate, including device removal. The secondary variable was self-perceived satisfaction using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher’s exact test and logistic regression were performed. (3) Results: One hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients were included, twenty-one (14%) previously treated for urethral or bladder neck stricture (seven urethroplasty, nine internal urethrotomy and five bladder neck incision). After ATOMS adjustment, 38% of the patients with treated stricture were continent compared to 83% of those without (p < 0.0001). After weighted matched observations using propensity score pairing, the proportion of continent patients without a previous stricture was 56% (p = 0.236). Complications occurred in 29% of the patients with stricture and in 20% of those without (p = 0.34). The severity of the complications was distributed evenly among the groups (p = 0.42). Regarding self-perceived satisfaction with the implant, 90% of the patients with stricture perceived the results satisfactorily (PGI-I 1–3) compared to 97% of the rest (p = 0.167). Stricture was associated with radiotherapy (p < 0.0001) and time from prostatectomy to implantation (p = 0.012). There was a moderate correlation between previous stricture and the severity of incontinence, both evaluated according to the 24-h pad test (Rho = 0.378; p < 0.0001) and the ICIQ-SF questionnaire (Rho = 0.351; p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis for the factors predictive of failure after ATOMS adjustment revealed previous stricture (OR 4.66; 95% CI 1.2–18.87), baseline 24-h pad test (per 100 mL, OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.09–1.52) and final cushion volume (per mL, OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.19–1.55). This model predicted dryness with an AUC of 92%. After the PSMATCH procedure using a propensity score, the model remained unchanged, with the previous stricture (OR 8.05; 95% CI 1.08–110.83), baseline 24-h pad test (per 100 mL, OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.15–2.26) and final cushion volume (per mL, OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.17–2) being independent predictors and an AUC of 93%. (4) Conclusions: ATOMS can be used to treat male stress incontinence in patients with a history of stricture, although the effectiveness of the device is reduced. On the other hand, the security and perceived satisfaction were equivalent for both groups. Full article

To present our 12-year experience using an endoscopic approach to manage bladder neck contracture (BNC) without adjunctive intralesional agents and compare it to published series not incorporating them, we retrospectively reviewed 123 patients treated for BNC from 2008 to 2020. All underwent 24 Fr balloon dilation followed by transurethral incision of BNC (TUIBNC) with deep incisions at 3 and 9 o’clock using a Collins knife without the use of intralesional injections. Success was defined as a patent bladder neck and 16 Fr cystoscope passage into the bladder two months later. Most with recurrent BNC underwent repeat TUIBNC. Success rates, demographics, and BNC characteristics were analyzed. The etiology of BNC in our cohort was most commonly radical prostatectomy with or without radiation (36/123, 29.3%, 40/123, 32.5%). Some had BNC treatment prior to referral (30/123, 24.4%). At 12-month follow-up, bladder neck patency was observed in 101/123 (82.1%) after one TUIBNC. An additional 15 patients (116/123, 94.3%) had success after two TUIBNCs. On univariate and multivariate analyses, ≥2 endoscopic treatments was the only factor associated with failure. TUIBNC via balloon dilation and deep bilateral incisions without the use of adjunctive intralesional injections has a high patency rate. History of two or more prior endoscopic procedures is associated with failure. Full article

Bladder outlet obstruction following treatment of pelvic cancer, predominantly prostate cancer, occurs in 1–8% of patients. The high incidence of prostate cancer combined with the long-life expectancy after treatment has increased concerns with cancer survivorship care. However, despite increased oncological cure rates, these adverse events do occur, compromising patients’ quality of life. Non-traumatic obstruction of the posterior urethra and bladder neck include membranous and prostatic urethral stenosis and bladder neck stenosis (also known as contracture). The devastated bladder outlet can result from benign conditions, such as neurogenic dysfunction, trauma, iatrogenic causes, or more frequently from complications of oncologic treatment, such as prostate, bladder and rectum. Most posterior urethral stenoses may respond to endoluminal treatments such as dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy, and occasionally urethral stents. Although surgical reconstruction offers the best chance of durable success, these reconstructive options are fraught with severe complications and, therefore, are far from being ideal. In patients with prior RT, failed reconstruction, densely fibrotic and/or necrotic and calcified posterior urethra, refractory incontinence or severe comorbidities, reconstruction may not be either feasible or recommended. In these cases, urinary diversion with or without cystectomy is usually required. This review aims to discuss the diagnostic evaluation and treatment options for patients with bladder outlet obstruction with a special emphasis on patients unsuitable for reconstruction of the posterior urethra and requiring urinary diversion. Full article

Objectives: Bladder neck contracture (BNC) is a bothersome complication following endoscopic treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The objective of our study was to give a more realistic insight into contemporary endoscopic BNC treatment and to evaluate and identify risk factors associated with inferior outcome. Material and Methods: We identified patients who underwent transurethral treatment for BNC secondary to previous endoscopic therapy for BPH between March 2009 and October 2016. Patients with vesico-urethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy were excluded. Digital charts were reviewed for re-admissions and re-visits at our institutions and patients were contacted personally for follow-up. Our non-validated questionnaire assessed previous urologic therapies (including radiotherapy, endoscopic, and open surgery), time to eventual further therapy in case of BNC recurrence, and the modality of recurrence management. Results: Of 60 patients, 49 (82%) and 11 (18%) underwent transurethral bladder neck resection and incision, respectively. Initial BPH therapy was transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in 54 (90%) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in six (10%) patients. Median time from prior therapy was 8.5 (IQR 5.3–14) months and differed significantly in those with (6.5 months; IQR 4–10) and those without BNC recurrence (10 months; IQR 6–20; p = 0.046). Thirty-three patients (55%) underwent initial endoscopic treatment, and 27 (45%) repeated endoscopic treatment for BNC. In initially-treated patients, time since BPH surgery differed significantly between those with a recurrence (median 7.5 months; IQR 6–9) compared to those treated successfully (median 12 months; IQR 9–25; p = 0.01). In patients with repeated treatment, median time from prior BNC therapy did not differ between those with (4.5 months; IQR 2–12) and those without a recurrence (6 months; IQR 6–10; p = 0.6). Overall, BNC treatment was successful in 32 patients (53%). The observed success rate of BNC treatment was significantly higher after HoLEP compared to TURP (100% vs. 48%; p = 0.026). Type of BNC treatment, number of BNC treatment, and age at surgery did not influence the outcome. Conclusions: A longer time interval between previous BPH therapy and subsequent BNC incidence seems to favorably affect treatment success of endoscopic BNC treatment, and transurethral resection and incision appear equally effective. Granted the relatively small sample size, BNC treatment success seems to be higher after HoLEP compared to TURP, which warrants validation in larger cohorts. Full article