Search Results (21)

Background/Objective: Recent North American guidelines suggest that CT is indicated for further evaluation where ultrasound (US) is negative, although the negative predictive value (NPV) of ultrasound in adult patients when the appendix is not seen remains unclear. To assess the negative predictive value (NPV) of ultrasound in adult patients when the appendix is not seen. Methods: A scoping review of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed from inception to 13 May 2025 using PRISMA-ScR guidelines to identify studies evaluating the outcome of adult patients where the appendix is not seen on ultrasound, with preference for studies where there were no secondary signs of acute appendicitis (right lower quadrant free fluid, abscess, ileus, echogenic fat or regional lymphadenopathy). Original studies with at least 10 patients were included in the review. The reference standard included a combination of clinical follow-up, CT and/or pathology. Data synthesis was provided as a qualitative review of the existing literature. Results: Six studies were included in the review. The number of included patients range from 12 to 179 with a mean age of 29–38 years. Few studies reported the patient BMI. NPVs ranged from 80 to 90% for all indeterminate ultrasounds and 83 to 95% for studies where secondary signs of appendicitis were excluded (90 to 95% when non-surgical reference standards were included). Two studies reported NPVs of 96–100% when the pre-test probability was low. Conclusions: The NPV of indeterminate ultrasound for adult patients with right lower quadrant pain and no secondary signs of appendicitis is likely ≥90%. When combined with a low clinical suspicion, the NPV is likely >95%. The appropriateness of a subsequent CT indication when the appendix is not visualized on ultrasound should be determined on an individualized basis. Full article

Introduction: Acute appendicitis (AA) is a common cause of abdominal pain that can lead to complications like perforation and intra-abdominal abscesses, increasing morbidity and mortality, often requiring emergency surgery. Nevertheless, appendectomy is performed in up to 95% of uncomplicated cases, while complications like perforation and intra-abdominal abscesses increase morbidity and mortality. The current study compares the accuracy of GPT-4.5, DeepSeek R1, and machine learning in assisting with surgical decision-making for patients presenting with lower abdominal pain at the Emergency Department. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 63 histopathologically confirmed appendicitis patients and 50 control patients with right abdominal pain presenting at the Emergency Department at two German hospitals between October 2022 and October 2023 were included. Using each patient’s clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings, DeepSeek (with and without Retrieval-Augmented Generation using 2020 Jerusalem guidelines) was compared in terms of accuracy with GPT-4.5 and a random forest-based machine-learning model, with a board-certified surgeon (reference standard) to determine the optimal treatment approach (laparoscopic exploration/appendectomy versus conservative antibiotic therapy). Results: Accuracy of agreement with board-certified surgeons in the decision-making of appendectomy versus conservative therapy increased non-significantly from 80.5% to 83.2% with DeepSeek and from 70.8 to 76.1% when GPT-4.5 was provided with the World Journal of Emergency Surgery 2020 Jerusalem guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. The estimated machine-learning model training accuracy was 84.3%, while the validation accuracy for the model was 85.0%. Discussion: GPT-4.5 and DeepSeek R1, as well as the machine-learning model, demonstrate promise in aiding surgical decision-making for appendicitis, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Ongoing training and validation are required to optimize the performance of such models. Full article

Background and Objectives: Acute appendicitis is a common cause of abdominal pain requiring surgery in pediatric patients. Given concerns regarding radiation exposure from computed tomography (CT), ultrasound (US) has become the first-line diagnostic modality. In many emergency and resource-limited settings, non-radiologist physicians often perform these examinations. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a non-radiologist-performed ultrasound in detecting acute appendicitis in children. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature was searched across PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through June 2024. Studies reporting on the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of non-radiologist-performed ultrasounds in pediatric appendicitis were included. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, and a bivariate random-effects model was used for statistical analysis. Results: Eight studies, with a total of 1006 pediatric patients, were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83–0.90) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91–0.95), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.783 (95% CI, 0.708–0.853), suggesting moderate-to-good diagnostic accuracy. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies, possibly due to differences in operator training and ultrasound techniques. Conclusions: Non-radiologist-performed ultrasound demonstrates moderate-to-good diagnostic accuracy in identifying pediatric appendicitis. These findings support its implementation in emergency or resource-constrained settings and suggest that incorporating structured ultrasound training for non-radiologists may improve timely diagnosis and optimize clinical decision-making in pediatric emergency care. Full article

Background: This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic features of synchronous acute cholecystitis (AC) and acute appendicitis (AAP). Methods: The review protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251086131) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was performed across PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Google databases for studies published from January 1975 to May 2025. Search terms included variations of “synchronous,” “simultaneous,” “concurrent,” and “coexistence” combined with “appendicitis,” “appendectomy,” “cholecystitis,” and “cholecystectomy.” Reference lists of included studies were screened. Studies reporting human cases with sufficient patient-level clinical data were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by pairs of reviewers, with discrepancies resolved through consensus. No meta-analysis was conducted due to the descriptive nature of the data. Results: A total of 44 articles were included in this review. Of these, thirty-four were available in full text, one was accessible only as an abstract, and one was a literature review, while eight articles were inaccessible. Clinical data from forty patients, including two from our own cases, were evaluated, with a median age of 41 years. The gender distribution was equal, with a median age of 50 years among male patients and 36 years among female patients. Leukocytosis was observed in 25 of 33 patients with available laboratory data. Among 37 patients with documented diagnostic methods, ultrasonography and computed tomography were the most frequently utilized modalities, followed by physical examination. Twenty-seven patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The remaining patients were managed with open surgery or conservative treatment. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients, including sepsis, perforation, leakage, diarrhea, and wound infections. Histopathological analysis revealed AAP in 25 cases and AC in 14. Additional findings included gangrenous inflammation and neoplastic lesions. Conclusions: Synchronous AC and AAP are rare and diagnostically challenging conditions. Early recognition via imaging and clinical evaluation is critical. Laparoscopic management remains the preferred approach. Histopathological examination of surgical specimens is essential for identifying unexpected pathology, thereby guiding appropriate patient management. Full article

Background: The simultaneous surgical treatment of acute appendicitis and inguinal hernia in children is still controversial. However, there are no established guidelines for the simultaneous surgical treatment of pediatric patients with acute appendicitis and inguinal hernia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a simultaneous laparoscopic approach for acute appendicitis and inguinal hernia in a pediatric population. Methods: The case records of 2254 pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy at our institution between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2025 were reviewed. Finally, 44 patients who met the inclusion criteria and had an inguinal hernia at the time of laparoscopic appendectomy were selected for further analysis. The patients who underwent single-stage surgery (simultaneous laparoscopic appendectomy and hernia repair) were assigned to group I (n = 25), while the patients who underwent delayed laparoscopic hernia repair were assigned to group II (n = 19). The groups were compared for final outcome, complications, rate of readmissions within 30 days of index surgery, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay. Results: The mean age of all the included patients was 11.5 ± 4.0 years, with males slightly outnumbering females (n = 25, 56.8%). The study population consisted of two comparable groups in terms of age, anthropometric measures, gender distribution, and baseline clinical characteristics. A major difference between the two methods was the operation time, which was significantly longer in the single-stage group (53.5 ± 11.2 min vs. 41.5 ± 10.9 min; p = 0.001). Despite the difference in operative time, the length of hospital stay (3.5 ± 2.0 days vs. 3.5 ± 2.2 days; p = 0.899) was almost identical between the two groups, suggesting that the additional intraoperative time was not reflected in a prolonged recovery time. In addition, postoperative complications were rare and evenly distributed between both surgical strategies (n = 2 (8%) vs. n = 2 (10.5%); p = 0.772). All the complications were minor and were treated conservatively. Importantly, there was no recurrence of hernia in either group during the follow-up period. Conclusions: From a clinical perspective, these results suggest that the single-stage approach is feasible and safe, even in complicated appendicitis, particularly in cases where the postponement of hernia repair is not desirable. The longer operative time associated with the single-stage approach must be weighed against the potential benefits of avoiding a second surgical procedure and unnecessary anesthesia, reducing overall healthcare utilization, and minimizing patient burden. Full article

Background and objectives: Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), primarily associated with sexually transmitted infections (STIs), represents a diagnostic challenge in virgin pediatric patients due to the often vague, non-specific symptomatology, which can mimic other conditions. Management prioritizes targeted antimicrobial therapy, with surgical intervention reserved for complications like tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA). The present systematic review aimed to critically evaluate the available evidence from case reports of PID in virgin pediatric and adolescent patients. Methods: The search strategy was in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Case reports published up to March 2025 were searched through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. We included English-language case reports on non-sexually active pediatric and adolescent patients with available full text, excluding commentaries, reviews, and editorials. The Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports was used for the quality assessment of case reports. Through descriptive analysis, PID symptoms, diagnostic, and management modalities were reviewed. The quality of the included case reports was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. This review was not registered and did not receive external funding. Results: Among the 56 case reports searched, 20 reports were selected and analyzed based on eight criteria. The most frequently reported symptoms were lower abdominal pain (95.8%), fever (63.6%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (50%). Common comorbidities included urinary tract infections (22.7%), congenital anomalies (18.1%), and appendicitis history (18.1%). Escherichia coli and Streptococcus species were the predominant pathogens identified. All patients received antibiotic therapy, while 90.9% underwent surgical intervention. Favorable outcomes were achieved in 72.7% of cases, though 27.2% experienced complications or recurrences. Conclusions: Although commonly linked to sexual activity, PID should be considered in sexually inactive pediatric patients presenting with abdominal pain and adnexal masses. Early diagnosis, appropriate imaging, and timely treatment are crucial to improve outcomes and reduce complications. The evidence in this review is limited by its reliance on case reports, which may introduce bias and restrict generalizability. Full article

Background/Objectives: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common causes of emergency department visits due to acute abdominal pain, with a lifetime risk of 7–8%. Managing AA presents significant challenges, particularly among vulnerable patient groups, due to its association with substantial morbidity and mortality. Methods: The EUPEMEN (European PErioperative MEdical Networking) project aims to optimize perioperative care for AA by developing multidisciplinary guidelines that integrate theoretical knowledge and clinical expertise from five European countries. This study presents the key elements of the EUPEMEN protocol, which focuses on reducing surgical stress, optimizing perioperative care, and enhancing postoperative recovery. Results: Through this standardized approach, the protocol aims to lower postoperative morbidity and mortality, shorten hospital stays, and improve overall patient outcomes. The recommendations are tailored to address the variability in clinical practice across Europe and are designed to be widely implementable in diverse healthcare settings. Conclusions: The conclusions drawn from this study highlight the potential for the EUPEMEN protocol to significantly improve perioperative care standards for AA, demonstrating its value as a practical, adaptable tool for clinicians. Full article

Background: In this retrospective study, we evaluate the diagnostic utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) and leucocyte count within the EAES 2015 guidelines for acute appendicitis (AA) in differentiating uncomplicated (UAA) from complicated AA (CAA). Methods: Conducted at a tertiary care center in Germany, the study included 285 patients over 18 years who were diagnosed with AA from January 2019 to December 2021. Patient data included demographics, inflammatory markers, and postoperative outcomes. Results: CRP levels (Md: 60.2 mg/dL vs. 10.5 mg/dL; p < 0.001) and leucocyte count (Md: 14.4 Gpt/L vs. 13.1 Gpt/L; p = 0.016) were higher in CAA. CRP had a medium diagnostic value for detecting CAA (AUC = 0.79), with a cutoff at 44.3 mg/L, making it more likely to develop CAA. Leucocyte count showed low predictive value for CAA (AUC = 0.59). CRP ≥ 44.3 mg/L was associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications (OR: 2.9; p = 0.002) and prolonged hospitalization (OR: 3.5; p < 0.001). Conclusions: CRP, within the context of the EAES classification, presents as a valuable diagnostic marker to distinguish CAA from UAA, with a higher risk of postoperative complications and hospitalization. Leucocyte count showed low diagnostic value for the identification of CAA. Full article

Background/Objectives: Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANENs) are usually found incidentally during histology examination after appendectomy for appendicitis. Due to their rarity in pediatric populations, there is no consensus on treatment or follow-up. The analysis of patients with ANENs of our and other studies will increase the understanding of this tumor. Methods: Pediatric patients with ANENs were uniformly managed at our center between 1998 and 2023. Patients’ presenting symptoms, surgery, tumor histology, post-surgical work-up, follow-up and outcome were analyzed. Results: Our report describes 17 patients with a diagnosis of ANEN after appendectomy. The median age was 14 years (range of 4–17 years). Tumors were located at the tip of the appendix in 58.8% of cases and only one had a diameter >1 cm. All were well-differentiated tumors with free resection margins. The submucosa was invaded in five cases, muscularis propria in eight and subserosa in four. Post-appendectomy work-up included tumor marker measurement, abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, chest X-ray and octreotide scintigraphy. No residual tumors or metastases were detected. Additional surgery was not necessary. Follow-up was carried out for a median duration of 6 years (range of 1–10 years). Only one patient was lost to follow-up and all other patients are alive without tumor recurrence. Conclusions: The tumor characteristics of our patients confirmed data from the literature. With the lack of a sufficient number of large prospective trials, it is important to add more information to confirm the benign nature and excellent outcome of this tumor, even without additional surgery. Consensus guidelines are needed for ANENs in pediatric populations. Full article

Background: Airway management in Duchenne patients can be challenging. We present a case of an anticipated difficult airway in a 24-year-old Duchenne patient that was managed by planning different suitable strategies based on the unanticipated difficult airway algorithm of the Difficult Airway Society (DAS). Case presentation: The patient initially presented with appendicitis, requiring a laparoscopic appendectomy within 6 h. Due to the underlying condition and a known difficult airway, we anticipated potential airway problems and successfully managed the “can ventilate but cannot intubate” situation using the algorithm. The difficult airway was attributed to reduced mandibular mobility, limited inclination or reclination, a large tongue, prominent incisors, and a posteriorly positioned epiglottis. Despite thorough preparation and team briefing, we experienced three failed intubation attempts. Considering limited nighttime resources, the urgency of the surgery, the need for a tube for laparoscopy, and the risk of exacerbating airway issues, we made the decision to awaken the patient and wait for a second attempt after the epiglottis swelling had subsided. We used reversible, short-acting agents for induction, enabling us to continue with the algorithm within the allotted timeframe. In a second stage, we successfully performed fiberoptic-guided intubation via a supraglottic airway device using the Aintree intubation catheter, utilizing more favorable resources. Conclusions: For a patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and a difficult airway, advanced expertise is critical. Detailed anesthesia planning, clear team communication, and the use of reversible, short-acting agents are crucial. Adherence to the Difficult Airway Society guidelines is essential for safe airway management. Full article

Background: Many scoring systems, algorithms, and guidelines have been developed to aid in the evaluation and diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). Many of these algorithms advocate against the routine use of radiological investigations when there is a high clinical suspicion of AA. However, there has been a significant rise in the use of imaging techniques for diagnosing AA in the past two decades. This is a national study aimed at assessing the adherence of residents assigned to the emergency department to the clinical guidelines for diagnosing AA. Methods: We introduced a case study of a male patient with highly suspicious clinical findings of AA to all surgical and emergency medicine residents assigned to the emergency department with the autonomy to make critical decisions to determine the preferred way of diagnosing AA. Results: A total of 62.4% of all relevant residents participated in this survey; 69.6% reported that the Alvarado score was eight or higher, and 82.1% estimated that the next step recommended by most clinical guidelines was appendectomy without further abdominal imaging tests. However, 83.4% chose to perform an imaging test to establish the diagnosis of AA. Conclusions: Our study revealed a notable non-adherence to clinical guidelines in diagnosing AA. Given the significance of these guidelines, we assert that adopting medical recommendations should not solely depend on individual education but should also be incorporated as a departmental policy. Full article

Meckel’s diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract with a 1–3% prevalence in the general population. The surgical management of symptomatic MD is well described in the literature, but there is still no consensus on the indication for prophylactic resection of incidental asymptomatic MD. To address this issue, we extensively reviewed the current literature and report our experience with laparoscopic management of an unusual case of MD causing ileal volvulus and acute peritonitis two weeks after a laparoscopic appendectomy for acute gangrenous appendicitis performed in another hospital. A 50-year-old man presented to the emergency department with acute and severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation. He had undergone a laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis two weeks before in another hospital. The patient was apyretic, distressed, and seeking an antalgic position. The abdomen was mildly distended and tender, and the Blumberg sign was mildly positive in the central quadrants. The clinical picture deteriorated with fever, peritonismus, and leukocytosis. A CT scan showed an ileo–ileal adhesion near the ileocolic junction and dilatation of the upstream loops with the air–fluid levels. Through an urgent laparoscopy, a necrotic mass, the MD, was wedge-resected, and the surrounding ileal volvulus derotated. The postoperative course was uneventful. There is no definitive consensus on the appropriate management of incidental asymptomatic MD, although several studies have attempted to identify guiding criteria. Features of the MD, the patient’s risk factors, clinical presentation, and surgical approach need to be considered to establish definitive guidelines for the management of incidental asymptomatic MD. In the absence of definitive guidelines, personal expertise and judgement are the main resources for the surgeon approaching an incidental asymptomatic MD. Full article

Background: Acute appendicitis is a frequently encountered surgical emergency. Despite several scoring systems, the possibility of delayed diagnosis persists. In addition, a delayed diagnosis leads to an increased risk of complicated appendicitis. Hence, there is a need to identify biological markers to help clinicians rapidly and accurately diagnose and prognosticate acute appendicitis with a high sensitivity and specificity. Although several markers have been evaluated, the pressing concern is still the low specificity of these markers. One such marker is serum ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), which can be a novel biomarker for accurately diagnosing and prognosticating acute appendicitis. Methods: The authors conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases through February 2023 as per the PRISMA guidelines. The difference in the levels of IMA between patients with acute appendicitis vs. healthy controls, and the difference in the levels of IMA between patients with complicated vs. non-complicated acute appendicitis were taken as the outcome measures. Statistical analysis was performed using a random effects model and mean difference (MD) was calculated. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by utilizing the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. Results: A total of six prospective comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed that the mean level of serum IMA was significantly raised in the acute appendicitis group (MD 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.37, p = 0.01). Similarly, the mean serum IMA levels were also raised in the complicated appendicitis group compared to the non-complicated appendicitis group (MD 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.10, p = 0.02). Three of the studies included were, however, of poor methodological quality. Conclusions: Serum IMA is a viable potential marker for diagnosing and prognosticating acute appendicitis. However, due to the limited methodological quality of available studies, further prospectively designed and adequately powered studies are needed. Full article

Background: Due to a lack of rapid, accurate diagnostic tools for early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) at the initial suspicion, infants are often unnecessarily given antibiotics directly after birth. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for EOS before antibiotic initiation and to investigate whether presepsin can be used to guide clinicians’ decisions on whether to start antibiotics. Methods: In this multicenter prospective observational cohort study, all infants who started on antibiotics for EOS suspicion were consecutively included. Presepsin concentrations were determined in blood samples collected at the initial EOS suspicion (t = 0). In addition to this, samples were collected at 3, 6, 12 and 24 h after the initial EOS suspicion and from the umbilical cord directly after birth. The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin was calculated. Results: A total of 333 infants were included, of whom 169 were born preterm. We included 65 term and 15 preterm EOS cases. At the initial EOS suspicion, the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.60 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.70) in the term-born infants compared to 0.84 (95% CI 0.73–0.95) in the preterm infants. A cut-off value of 645 pg/mL resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54% in the preterm infants. The presepsin concentrations in cord blood and at other time points did not differ significantly from the concentrations at the initial EOS suspicion. Conclusions: Presepsin is a biomarker with an acceptable diagnostic accuracy for EOS (culture-proven and clinical EOS) in preterm infants and might be of value in reducing antibiotic exposure after birth when appended to current EOS guidelines. However, the small number of EOS cases prevents us from drawing firm conclusions. Further research should be performed to evaluate whether appending a presepsin-guided step to current EOS guidelines leads to a safe decrease in antibiotic overtreatment and antibiotic-related morbidity. Full article

Background and Objectives: While laparoscopic appendectomy is standardized, techniques for appendiceal stump closure and mesoappendix division remain variable. Novel vessel sealing techniques are increasingly utilized ubiquitously. We sought to systematically summarize all relevant data and to define the current evidence on the safety and utility of energy devices for clipless–sutureless laparoscopic appendectomy in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria included studies with laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis. The intervention included patients undergoing division of mesoappendix and/or securing of the appendicular base using diathermy (Monopolar or Bipolar or LigaSure Sealing Device) or Harmonic Scalpel (Group A) compared to patients undergoing division of mesoappendix and/or securing of the appendicular base using endoclip or Hem-o-lok or ligature (Group B). The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Downs and Black scale. The outcomes of surgical site infection (SSI) or intra-abdominal collection, postoperative ileus, average operative duration, and length of hospital stay (LHS) were compared. Results: Six comparative studies were included; three were retrospective, two were prospective, and one was ambispective. Meta-analysis revealed a shorter operative duration in Group A with respect to appendicular base ligation (MD −12.34, 95% CI −16.57 to −8.11, p < 0.00001) and mesoappendix division (MD −8.06, 95% CI −14.03 to −2.09, p = 0.008). The pooled risk ratios showed no difference in SSI between groups. Additionally, no difference was observed in LHS. The risk of postoperative ileus was higher in group B regarding mesoappendix division (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.93, p = 0.02), but no difference was found concerning appendicular base ligation. The included studies showed a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Conclusions: Clipless–sutureless laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and fast. Postoperative ileus seems less common with energy devices for mesoappendix division. However, the studies included have a moderate-to-high risk of bias. Further studies addressing the individual devices with surgeons of similar levels are needed. Full article