Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = aphidophagous hoverflies

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 31783 KB  
Article
Detailed and Complete Descriptions of Immature Stages of Two Predatory Species of Eupeodes Osten Sacken, 1877 (Diptera: Syrphidae)
by José J. Orengo-Green, Javier Quinto, Zorica Nedeljković and María Ángeles Marcos-García
Taxonomy 2025, 5(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy5020031 - 9 Jun 2025
Viewed by 4569
Abstract
With over 40 species, Eupeodes Osten Sacken, 1877, is a common aphidophagous hoverfly genus (Diptera: Syrphidae: Syrphinae) with a worldwide distribution. The immature stages of Eupeodes are well known, since 23 species have been reared, but only 8 species have been described. All [...] Read more.
With over 40 species, Eupeodes Osten Sacken, 1877, is a common aphidophagous hoverfly genus (Diptera: Syrphidae: Syrphinae) with a worldwide distribution. The immature stages of Eupeodes are well known, since 23 species have been reared, but only 8 species have been described. All known immature stages of Eupeodes species have predatory feeding habits, mainly on aphids and other soft-bodied Hemiptera, for which some of its species are commonly used as agents of biological control programs. In this work, the puparium of Eupeodes bucculatus (Rondani, 1857) is detailed and re-described, and the complete morphology of all immature stages of the life cycle of Eupeodes corollae (Fabricius, 1794) is documented by using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope techniques. An update to the taxonomic key for the known larvae/puparium of Eupeodes species is also provided. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2160 KB  
Article
Oviposition Preference of the American Hoverfly, Eupeodes americanus, between Banker Plants and Target Crops
by Noémie Gonzalez, Arlette Fauteux, Jean-Christophe Louis, Rosemarije Buitenhuis and Eric Lucas
Insects 2023, 14(3), 295; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14030295 - 19 Mar 2023
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3513
Abstract
Assessing the oviposition preferences of predatory hoverflies is a key factor in the prediction of the success of these biological control agents against aphids in greenhouses, especially when using banker plant systems or in mixed-crop contexts. In this study, two aspects of the [...] Read more.
Assessing the oviposition preferences of predatory hoverflies is a key factor in the prediction of the success of these biological control agents against aphids in greenhouses, especially when using banker plant systems or in mixed-crop contexts. In this study, two aspects of the oviposition preferences of the American hoverfly, Eupeodes americanus (Wiedemann, 1830) (Diptera: Syrphidae), were evaluated. Firstly, the preference between the banker plant and the target crop was evaluated for three banker plant species (barley, finger millet, or corn) and two target crops (cucumber or pepper). Secondly, the preference between the same two target crops was assessed. Female oviposition preferences were evaluated via two-choice experiments using different plant/aphid systems. The results showed that, for the cucumber crops, the species of banker plant used drastically influenced the oviposition preference of the hoverfly, with a preference for barley over cucumber, cucumber over finger millet, and no preference between corn and cucumber. Unlike cucumber, when used with pepper, barley engendered a preference for the target crop. We conclude that the barley banker plant could be adequate for aphid control in pepper but not in cucumber crops. In a mixed-crop context, the American hoverfly had no preference between cucumber and pepper, which means it has the potential to protect both crops in a mixed-crop greenhouse context. This study shows that the banker plant system should be carefully chosen according to the crops/aphids present in the greenhouse to optimize the impact of the hoverfly as a biocontrol agent. Further work is required to confirm this choice of banker plant in semifield or field testing. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Integrated Pest Management of Crops)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 5643 KB  
Article
Impacts of Semiochemical Traps Designed for Bruchus rufimanus Boheman 1833 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on Nontarget Beneficial Entomofauna in Field Bean Crops
by Arnaud Segers, Grégoire Noël, Louise Delanglez, Rudy Caparros Megido and Frédéric Francis
Insects 2023, 14(2), 153; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14020153 - 2 Feb 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5043
Abstract
Broad bean weevils (BBWs–Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) are serious pests of field bean seeds that hamper the promotion of this crop in the diversification of European cropping systems. Recent research has identified different semiochemical lures and trap devices for the development of semiochemical-based control strategies [...] Read more.
Broad bean weevils (BBWs–Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) are serious pests of field bean seeds that hamper the promotion of this crop in the diversification of European cropping systems. Recent research has identified different semiochemical lures and trap devices for the development of semiochemical-based control strategies of BBWs. In this study, two field trials were carried out in order to provide necessary information supporting the implementation of sustainable field use of semiochemical traps against BBWs. More particularly, three principal objectives were followed including (i) the identification of the most efficient traps for BBWs capture and the influence of trapping modality on BBWs sex-ratio, (ii) the assessment of eventual collateral effects on crop benefits including aphidophagous and pollinator insects such as Apidae, Syrphidae and Coccinellidae, (iii) the assessment of the crop developmental stage influence on the capture by semiochemical traps. Three different semiochemical lures were tested in combination with two trapping devices across two field trials in early and late flowering field bean crops. The crop phenology and climate parameters were integrated into the analyses to interpret the spatiotemporal evolution of the captured insect populations. A total of 1380 BBWs and 1424 beneficials were captured. White pan traps combined with floral kairomones were the most efficient traps for the capture of BBWs. We demonstrated that the crop phenology (c.f., the flowering stage) exerted strong competition on the attractiveness of semiochemical traps. Community analysis revealed that only one species of BBWs was captured in field bean crops (i.e., Bruchus rufimanus), and no trend was highlighted concerning the sex ratios according to the trapping devices. The beneficial insect community included 67 different species belonging to bees, hoverflies and ladybeetles. Semiochemical traps manifested a strong impact on beneficial insect communities that included some species under extinction threats and need to be further adapted to minimize such collateral effects. Based on these results, recommendations are provided for the implementation of the most sustainable BBWs control method that minimizes the impact on the recruitment of beneficial insects, which is an important ecosystem service for faba bean crops. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop