Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = antisclerostin antibody

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 1707 KiB  
Review
Role of Sclerostin in Cardiovascular System
by Ning Zhang, Luyao Wang, Xiaofei Li, Xin Yang, Xiaohui Tao, Hewen Jiang, Yuanyuan Yu, Jin Liu, Sifan Yu, Yuan Ma, Baoting Zhang and Ge Zhang
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(10), 4552; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104552 - 9 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 960
Abstract
Sclerostin, encoded by the SOST gene, is a novel bone anabolic target for bone diseases. Humanized anti-sclerostin antibody, romosozumab, was approved for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but with a black-box warning on cardiovascular risk. The [...] Read more.
Sclerostin, encoded by the SOST gene, is a novel bone anabolic target for bone diseases. Humanized anti-sclerostin antibody, romosozumab, was approved for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but with a black-box warning on cardiovascular risk. The clinical data regarding cardiovascular events from various pre-marketing and post-marketing studies of romosozumab were inconsistent. Overall, the cardiovascular risk of sclerostin inhibition could not be excluded. The restriction of romosozumab in patients with cardiovascular disease history would be necessary. Moreover, genome-wide association study (GWAS) analyses of SOST variants revealed inconsistent results of the association between SOST variations and cardiovascular diseases. Further research incorporating larger sample sizes and functional analyses are necessary. In analyses of serum/tissue sclerostin levels in patients with cardiovascular diseases, the results were controversial but indicated an association between sclerostin and the presence/severity/outcomes of cardiovascular diseases. Nonclinical studies in rodents indicated the inhibitory effect of sclerostin on inflammation, aortic aneurysm, atherosclerosis, and vascular calcification. Sclerostin loop3 participated in the inhibitory effect of sclerostin on bone formation, while the cardiovascular protective effect of sclerostin was independent of sclerostin loop3. Macrophagic sclerostin loop2–apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) interaction participated in the inhibitory effect of sclerostin on inflammation in vitro. Sclerostin in human aortic smooth muscle cells participated in the reduction in calcium deposition. The role of sclerostin in cardiovascular system deserves further investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Pathology, Diagnostics, and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 3453 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Peri-Implant Bone Repair in Ovariectomized Rats Submitted to the Implant Placement Functionalized with Anti-Sclerostin
by Pedro Henrique Silva Gomes-Ferreira, Paula Buzo Frigério, Nathália Dantas Duarte, Juliana de Moura, Naara Gabriela Monteiro, André Luis da Silva Fabris and Roberta Okamoto
Bioengineering 2025, 12(4), 358; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040358 - 30 Mar 2025
Viewed by 489
Abstract
(1) Background: The challenges in Implantology involve the development of alternative methods to enhance bone repair in patients with systemic conditions, such as osteoporosis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a local anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibody (Scl-Ab) on the functionalization of titanium [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The challenges in Implantology involve the development of alternative methods to enhance bone repair in patients with systemic conditions, such as osteoporosis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a local anti-sclerostin monoclonal antibody (Scl-Ab) on the functionalization of titanium implant surfaces through a dip-coating technique in peri-implant bone repair. (2) Methods: A total of 32 female rats were separated into four groups (n = 8): SHAM NT (Sham surgery), OVX NT (ovariectomy), SHAM Scl-Ab (SHAM; implants functionalized with Scl-Ab), and OVX Scl-Ab (OVX; implants functionalized with Scl-Ab). Implant surgery was executed 30 days after ovariectomy, and the rats were euthanized 28 days postoperatively. The right tibia was used for removal torque and RT-PCR, while the left tibia was collected for micro-CT and laser confocal microscopy. (3) Results: Functionalization with Scl-Ab significantly increased the gene expression of bone markers, especially ALP, in the SHAM Scl-Ab group compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). (4) Conclusions: Some parameters of this study indicate that implants functionalized with anti-sclerostin bone anabolic drug enhance peri-implant bone repair, especially in healthy rats. However, more studies must be carried out to confirm the therapeutic benefits of this approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 3417 KiB  
Review
Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Strategies in Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review
by Nyruz Ramadan Elahmer, Sok Kuan Wong, Norazlina Mohamed, Ekram Alias, Kok-Yong Chin and Norliza Muhammad
Biomedicines 2024, 12(8), 1635; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12081635 - 23 Jul 2024
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 8066
Abstract
Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disorder characterized by decreased bone mass per unit volume, poses a significant global health burden due to its association with heightened fracture risk and adverse impacts on patients’ quality of life. This review synthesizes the current understanding of the [...] Read more.
Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disorder characterized by decreased bone mass per unit volume, poses a significant global health burden due to its association with heightened fracture risk and adverse impacts on patients’ quality of life. This review synthesizes the current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying osteoporosis, with a focus on key regulatory pathways governing osteoblast and osteoclast activities. These pathways include RANK/RANKL/OPG, Wingless-int (Wnt)/β-catenin, and Jagged1/Notch1 signaling, alongside the involvement of parathyroid hormone (PTH) signaling, cytokine networks, and kynurenine in bone remodeling. Pharmacotherapeutic interventions targeting these pathways play a pivotal role in osteoporosis management. Anti-resorptive agents, such as bisphosphonates, estrogen replacement therapy/hormone replacement therapy (ERT/HRT), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), calcitonin, anti-RANKL antibodies, and cathepsin K inhibitors, aim to mitigate bone resorption. Conversely, anabolic agents, including PTH and anti-sclerostin drugs, stimulate bone formation. In addition to pharmacotherapy, nutritional supplementation with calcium, vitamin D, and vitamin K2 holds promise for osteoporosis prevention. However, despite the availability of therapeutic options, a substantial proportion of osteoporotic patients remain untreated, highlighting the need for improved clinical management strategies. This comprehensive review aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a mechanistic understanding of osteoporosis pathogenesis and the therapeutic mechanisms of existing medications. By elucidating these insights, this review seeks to inform evidence-based decision-making and optimize therapeutic outcomes for patients with osteoporosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Osteoarthritis and Osteoporosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 608 KiB  
Review
Antisclerostin Effect on Osseointegration and Bone Remodeling
by Bárbara Alexandra do Amaral Couto, Juliana Campos Hasse Fernandes, Mariana Saavedra-Silva, Hernan Roca, Rogério Moraes Castilho and Gustavo Vicentis de Oliveira Fernandes
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1294; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041294 - 6 Feb 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2357
Abstract
Objective: This study reviewed the literature on local or systemic administration of antisclerostin, presenting results associated with osseointegration of dental/orthopedic implants and stimulation of bone remodeling. Materials and Methods: An extensive electronic search was conducted through MED-LINE/PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of [...] Read more.
Objective: This study reviewed the literature on local or systemic administration of antisclerostin, presenting results associated with osseointegration of dental/orthopedic implants and stimulation of bone remodeling. Materials and Methods: An extensive electronic search was conducted through MED-LINE/PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science databases and specific peer-reviewed journals to identify case reports, case series, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials and animal studies comparing either the systemic or local administration of antisclerostin and its effect in osseointegration and bone remodeling. Articles in English and with no restriction on period were included. Results: Twenty articles were selected for a full-text, and one was excluded. Finally, 19 articles were included in the study (16 animal studies and 3 randomized control trials). These studies were divided into two groups, which evaluated (i) osseointegration and (ii) bone remodeling potential. Initially 4560 humans and 1191 animals were identified. At least 1017 were excluded from the studies (981 humans and 36 animals), totaling 4724 subjects who completed (3579 humans and 1145 animals). (a) Osseointegration: 7 studies described this phenomenon; 4 reported bone-implant contact, which increased in all included studies. Similar results were found for bone mineral density, bone area/volume and bone thickness. (b) Bone remodeling: 13 studies were used for description. The studies reported an increase in BMD with sclerostin antibody treatment. A similar effect was found for bone mineral density/area/volume, trabecular bone and bone formation. Three biomarkers of bone formation were identified: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), osteocalcin and procollagen type 1 N-terminal Pro-peptide (P1NP); and markers for bone resorption were: serum C-telopeptide (sCTX), C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX-1), β-isomer of C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (β-CTX) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b). There were limitations: low number of human studies identified; high divergence in the model used (animal or human); the variance in the type of Scl-Ab and doses of administration; and the lack of reference quantitative values in the parameters analyzed by authors’ studies (many articles only reported qualitative information). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this review and carefully observing all data, due to the number of articles included and the heterogeneity existing, more studies must be carried out to better evaluate the action of the antisclerostin on the osseointegration of dental implants. Otherwise, these findings can accelerate and stimulate bone remodeling and neoformation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 994 KiB  
Review
The Role of Sclerostin in Bone Diseases
by Elias S. Vasiliadis, Dimitrios-Stergios Evangelopoulos, Angelos Kaspiris, Ioannis S. Benetos, Christos Vlachos and Spyros G. Pneumaticos
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(3), 806; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030806 - 2 Feb 2022
Cited by 37 | Viewed by 9310
Abstract
Sclerostin has been identified as an important regulator of bone homeostasis through inhibition of the canonical Wnt-signaling pathway, and it is involved in the pathogenesis of many different skeletal diseases. Many studies have been published in the last few years regarding sclerostin’s origin, [...] Read more.
Sclerostin has been identified as an important regulator of bone homeostasis through inhibition of the canonical Wnt-signaling pathway, and it is involved in the pathogenesis of many different skeletal diseases. Many studies have been published in the last few years regarding sclerostin’s origin, regulation, and mechanism of action. The ongoing research emphasizes the potential therapeutic implications of sclerostin in many pathological conditions with or without skeletal involvement. Antisclerostin antibodies have recently been approved for the treatment of osteoporosis, and several animal studies and clinical trials are currently under way to evaluate the effectiveness of antisclerostin antibodies in the treatment of other than osteoporosis skeletal disorders and cancer with promising results. Understanding the exact role of sclerostin may lead to new therapeutic approaches for the treatment of skeletal disorders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in the Management of Rare Metabolic Bone Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 484 KiB  
Review
Osteoporosis Treatment with Anti-Sclerostin Antibodies—Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Application
by Martina Rauner, Hanna Taipaleenmäki, Elena Tsourdi and Elizabeth M. Winter
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(4), 787; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040787 - 16 Feb 2021
Cited by 56 | Viewed by 13303
Abstract
Osteoporosis is characterized by reduced bone mass and disruption of bone architecture, resulting in increased risk of fragility fractures and significant long-term disability. Although both anti-resorptive treatments and osteoanabolic drugs, such as parathyroid hormone analogues, are effective in fracture prevention, limitations exist due [...] Read more.
Osteoporosis is characterized by reduced bone mass and disruption of bone architecture, resulting in increased risk of fragility fractures and significant long-term disability. Although both anti-resorptive treatments and osteoanabolic drugs, such as parathyroid hormone analogues, are effective in fracture prevention, limitations exist due to lack of compliance or contraindications to these drugs. Thus, there is a need for novel potent therapies, especially for patients at high fracture risk. Romosozumab is a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin with a dual mode of action. It enhances bone formation and simultaneously suppresses bone resorption, resulting in a large anabolic window. In this opinion-based narrative review, we highlight the role of sclerostin as a critical regulator of bone mass and present human diseases of sclerostin deficiency as well as preclinical models of genetically modified sclerostin expression, which led to the development of anti-sclerostin antibodies. We review clinical studies of romosozumab in terms of bone mass accrual and anti-fracture activity in the setting of postmenopausal and male osteoporosis, present sequential treatment regimens, and discuss its safety profile and possible limitations in its use. Moreover, an outlook comprising future translational applications of anti-sclerostin antibodies in diseases other than osteoporosis is given, highlighting the clinical significance and future scopes of Wnt signaling in these settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Osteoporosis Treatment: Recent Developments and Ongoing Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 761 KiB  
Review
Anti-Sclerostin Antibodies in Osteoporosis and Other Bone Diseases
by Stéphanie Fabre, Thomas Funck-Brentano and Martine Cohen-Solal
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(11), 3439; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113439 - 26 Oct 2020
Cited by 63 | Viewed by 9243
Abstract
The Wnt pathway is a key element of bone remodeling; its activation stimulates bone formation and inhibits bone resorption. The discovery of sclerostin, a natural antagonist of the Wnt pathway, promoted the development of romosozumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against sclerostin, as [...] Read more.
The Wnt pathway is a key element of bone remodeling; its activation stimulates bone formation and inhibits bone resorption. The discovery of sclerostin, a natural antagonist of the Wnt pathway, promoted the development of romosozumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against sclerostin, as well as other anti-sclerostin antibodies. Phase 3 studies have shown the efficacy of romosozumab in the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women, against placebo but also against alendronate or teriparatide and this treatment also allows bone mineral density (BMD) increase in men. Romosozumab induces the uncoupling of bone remodeling, leading to both an increase in bone formation and a decrease in bone resorption during the first months of treatment. The effect is attenuated over time and reversible when stopped but transition with anti-resorbing agents allows the maintenance or reinforcement of BMD improvements. Some concerns were raised about cardiovascular events. Therefore, romosozumab was recently approved in several countries for the treatment of severe osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with high fracture risk and without a history of heart attack, myocardial infarction or stroke. This review aims to outline the role of sclerostin, the efficacy and safety of anti-sclerostin therapies and in particular romosozumab and their place in therapeutic strategies against osteoporosis or other bone diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Osteoporosis Treatment: Recent Developments and Ongoing Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop