Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = antimatroid

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 262 KB  
Article
Greedoids and Violator Spaces
by Yulia Kempner and Vadim E. Levit
Axioms 2024, 13(9), 633; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13090633 - 17 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1589
Abstract
This research explores the interplay between violator spaces and greedoids—two distinct theoretical frameworks developed independently. Violator spaces were introduced as a generalization of linear programming, while greedoids were designed to characterize combinatorial structures where greedy algorithms yield optimal solutions. These frameworks have, until [...] Read more.
This research explores the interplay between violator spaces and greedoids—two distinct theoretical frameworks developed independently. Violator spaces were introduced as a generalization of linear programming, while greedoids were designed to characterize combinatorial structures where greedy algorithms yield optimal solutions. These frameworks have, until now, existed in isolation. This paper bridges the gap by showing that greedoids can be defined using a modified violator operator. The established connections not only deepen our understanding of these theories but also provide a new characterization of antimatroids. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Algebra and Number Theory)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 385 KB  
Article
Closure System and Its Semantics
by Yinbin Lei and Jun Zhang
Axioms 2021, 10(3), 198; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10030198 - 23 Aug 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3794
Abstract
It is well known that topological spaces are axiomatically characterized by the topological closure operator satisfying the Kuratowski Closure Axioms. Equivalently, they can be axiomatized by other set operators encoding primitive semantics of topology, such as interior operator, exterior operator, boundary operator, or [...] Read more.
It is well known that topological spaces are axiomatically characterized by the topological closure operator satisfying the Kuratowski Closure Axioms. Equivalently, they can be axiomatized by other set operators encoding primitive semantics of topology, such as interior operator, exterior operator, boundary operator, or derived-set operator (or dually, co-derived-set operator). It is also known that a topological closure operator (and dually, a topological interior operator) can be weakened into generalized closure (interior) systems. What about boundary operator, exterior operator, and derived-set (and co-derived-set) operator in the weakened systems? Our paper completely answers this question by showing that the above six set operators can all be weakened (from their topological counterparts) in an appropriate way such that their inter-relationships remain essentially the same as in topological systems. Moreover, we show that the semantics of an interior point, an exterior point, a boundary point, an accumulation point, a co-accumulation point, an isolated point, a repelling point, etc. with respect to a given set, can be extended to an arbitrary subset system simply by treating the subset system as a base of a generalized interior system (and hence its dual, a generalized closure system). This allows us to extend topological semantics, namely the characterization of points with respect to an arbitrary set, in terms of both its spatial relations (interior, exterior, or boundary) and its dynamic convergence of any sequence (accumulation, co-accumulation, and isolation), to much weakened systems and hence with wider applicability. Examples from the theory of matroid and of Knowledge/Learning Spaces are used as an illustration. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop