Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = YefM-YoeB

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 1900 KiB  
Article
Use of Bacterial Toxin–Antitoxin Systems as Biotechnological Tools in Plants
by Bernardo Rodamilans, Xiaofei Cheng, Carmen Simón-Mateo and Juan Antonio García
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(19), 10449; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910449 - 27 Sep 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1400
Abstract
Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems in bacteria are key regulators of the cell cycle and can activate a death response under stress conditions. Like other bacterial elements, TA modules have been widely exploited for biotechnological purposes in diverse applications, such as molecular cloning and anti-cancer [...] Read more.
Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems in bacteria are key regulators of the cell cycle and can activate a death response under stress conditions. Like other bacterial elements, TA modules have been widely exploited for biotechnological purposes in diverse applications, such as molecular cloning and anti-cancer therapies. However, their use in plants has been limited, leaving room for the development of new approaches. In this study, we examined two TA systems previously tested in plants, MazEF and YefM-YoeB, and identified interesting differences between them, likely related to their modes of action. We engineered modifications to these specific modules to transform them into molecular switches that can be activated by a protease, inducing necrosis in the plant cells where they are expressed. Finally, we demonstrated the antiviral potential of the modified TA modules by using, as a proof-of-concept, the potyvirus plum pox virus as an activator of the death phenotype. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Advances in Molecular Plant Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2988 KiB  
Article
Genome Sequencing of five Lacticaseibacillus Strains and Analysis of Type I and II Toxin-Antitoxin System Distribution
by Alessia Levante, Camilla Lazzi, Giannis Vatsellas, Dimitris Chatzopoulos, Vasilis S. Dionellis, Periklis Makrythanasis, Erasmo Neviani and Claudia Folli
Microorganisms 2021, 9(3), 648; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9030648 - 21 Mar 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3090
Abstract
The analysis of bacterial genomes is a potent tool to investigate the distribution of specific traits related to the ability of surviving in particular environments. Among the traits associated with the adaptation to hostile conditions, toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems have recently gained attention in [...] Read more.
The analysis of bacterial genomes is a potent tool to investigate the distribution of specific traits related to the ability of surviving in particular environments. Among the traits associated with the adaptation to hostile conditions, toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems have recently gained attention in lactic acid bacteria. In this work, genome sequences of Lacticaseibacillus strains of dairy origin were compared, focusing on the distribution of type I TA systems homologous to Lpt/RNAII and of the most common type II TA systems. A high number of TA systems have been identified spread in all the analyzed strains, with type I TA systems mainly located on plasmid DNA. The type II TA systems identified in these strains highlight the diversity of encoded toxins and antitoxins and their organization. This study opens future perspectives on the use of genomic data as a resource for the study of TA systems distribution and prevalence in microorganisms of industrial relevance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxin–Antitoxin Systems in Pathogenic and Non-Pathogenic Bacteria)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3952 KiB  
Article
Insights into Transcriptional Repression of the Homologous Toxin-Antitoxin Cassettes yefM-yoeB and axe-txe
by Barbara Kędzierska, Katarzyna Potrykus, Agnieszka Szalewska-Pałasz and Beata Wodzikowska
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(23), 9062; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21239062 - 28 Nov 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2502
Abstract
Transcriptional repression is a mechanism which enables effective gene expression switch off. The activity of most of type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) cassettes is controlled in this way. These cassettes undergo negative autoregulation by the TA protein complex which binds to the promoter/operator sequence [...] Read more.
Transcriptional repression is a mechanism which enables effective gene expression switch off. The activity of most of type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) cassettes is controlled in this way. These cassettes undergo negative autoregulation by the TA protein complex which binds to the promoter/operator sequence and blocks transcription initiation of the TA operon. Precise and tight control of this process is vital to avoid uncontrolled expression of the toxin component. Here, we employed a series of in vivo and in vitro experiments to establish the molecular basis for previously observed differences in transcriptional activity and repression levels of the pyy and pat promoters which control expression of two homologous TA systems, YefM-YoeB and Axe-Txe, respectively. Transcriptional fusions of promoters with a lux reporter, together with in vitro transcription, EMSA and footprinting assays revealed that: (1) the different sequence composition of the −35 promoter element is responsible for substantial divergence in strengths of the promoters; (2) variations in repression result from the TA repressor complex acting at different steps in the transcription initiation process; (3) transcription from an additional promoter upstream of pat also contributes to the observed inefficient repression of axe-txe module. This study provides evidence that even closely related TA cassettes with high sequence similarity in the promoter/operator region may employ diverse mechanisms for transcriptional regulation of their genes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2052 KiB  
Article
Characterization of Two Toxin-Antitoxin Systems in Deep-Sea Streptomyces sp. SCSIO 02999
by Waner Zhan, Jianyun Yao, Kaihao Tang, Yangmei Li, Yunxue Guo and Xiaoxue Wang
Mar. Drugs 2019, 17(4), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/md17040211 - 4 Apr 2019
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3940
Abstract
Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are ubiquitous and abundant genetic elements in bacteria and archaea. Most previous TA studies have focused on commensal and pathogenic bacteria, but have rarely focused on marine bacteria, especially those isolated from the deep sea. Here, we identified and characterized [...] Read more.
Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are ubiquitous and abundant genetic elements in bacteria and archaea. Most previous TA studies have focused on commensal and pathogenic bacteria, but have rarely focused on marine bacteria, especially those isolated from the deep sea. Here, we identified and characterized three putative TA pairs in the deep-sea-derived Streptomyces sp. strain SCSIO 02999. Our results showed that Orf5461/Orf5462 and Orf2769/Orf2770 are bona fide TA pairs. We provide several lines of evidence to demonstrate that Orf5461 and Orf5462 constitute a type-II TA pair that are homologous to the YoeB/YefM TA pair from Escherichia coli. Although YoeB from SCSIO 02999 was toxic to an E. coli host, the homologous YefM antitoxin from SCSIO 02999 did not neutralize the toxic effect of YoeB from E. coli. For the Orf2769/Orf2770 TA pair, Orf2769 overexpression caused significant cell elongation and could lead to cell death in E. coli, and the neighboring Orf2770 could neutralize the toxic effect of Orf2769. However, no homologous toxin or antitoxin was found for this pair, and no direct interaction was found between Orf2769 and Orf2770. These results suggest that Orf2769 and Orf2770 may constitute a novel TA pair. Thus, deep-sea bacteria harbor typical and novel TA pairs. The biochemical and physiological functions of different TAs in deep-sea bacteria warrant further investigation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products from Marine Actinomycetes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2656 KiB  
Article
Identification of Three Type II Toxin-Antitoxin Systems in Streptococcus suis Serotype 2
by Jiali Xu, Nian Zhang, Manman Cao, Sujing Ren, Ting Zeng, Minglu Qin, Xigong Zhao, Fangyan Yuan, Huanchun Chen and Weicheng Bei
Toxins 2018, 10(11), 467; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10110467 - 13 Nov 2018
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4808
Abstract
Type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are highly prevalent in bacterial genomes and have been extensively studied. These modules involve in the formation of persistence cells, the biofilm formation, and stress resistance, which might play key roles in pathogen virulence. SezAT and yefM-yoeB TA [...] Read more.
Type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are highly prevalent in bacterial genomes and have been extensively studied. These modules involve in the formation of persistence cells, the biofilm formation, and stress resistance, which might play key roles in pathogen virulence. SezAT and yefM-yoeB TA modules in Streptococcus suis serotype 2 (S. suis 2) have been studied, although the other TA systems have not been identified. In this study, we investigated nine putative type II TA systems in the genome of S. suis 2 strain SC84 by bioinformatics analysis and identified three of them (two relBE loci and one parDE locus) that function as typical type II TA systems. Interestingly, we found that the introduction of the two RelBE TA systems into Escherichia coli or the induction of the ParE toxin led to cell filamentation. Promoter activity assays indicated that RelB1, RelB2, ParD, and ParDE negatively autoregulated the transcriptions of their respective TA operons, while RelBE2 positively autoregulated its TA operon transcription. Collectively, we identified three TA systems in S. suis 2, and our findings have laid an important foundation for further functional studies on these TA systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2001 KiB  
Article
The Streptococcus pneumoniae yefM-yoeB and relBE Toxin-Antitoxin Operons Participate in Oxidative Stress and Biofilm Formation
by Wai Ting Chan, Mirian Domenech, Inmaculada Moreno-Córdoba, Verónica Navarro-Martínez, Concha Nieto, Miriam Moscoso, Ernesto García and Manuel Espinosa
Toxins 2018, 10(9), 378; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10090378 - 18 Sep 2018
Cited by 40 | Viewed by 6426
Abstract
Type II (proteic) toxin-antitoxin systems (TAs) are widely distributed among bacteria and archaea. They are generally organized as operons integrated by two genes, the first encoding the antitoxin that binds to its cognate toxin to generate a harmless protein–protein complex. Under stress conditions, [...] Read more.
Type II (proteic) toxin-antitoxin systems (TAs) are widely distributed among bacteria and archaea. They are generally organized as operons integrated by two genes, the first encoding the antitoxin that binds to its cognate toxin to generate a harmless protein–protein complex. Under stress conditions, the unstable antitoxin is degraded by host proteases, releasing the toxin to achieve its toxic effect. In the Gram-positive pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae we have characterized four TAs: pezAT, relBE, yefM-yoeB, and phD-doc, although the latter is missing in strain R6. We have assessed the role of the two yefM-yoeB and relBE systems encoded by S. pneumoniae R6 by construction of isogenic strains lacking one or two of the operons, and by complementation assays. We have analyzed the phenotypes of the wild type and mutants in terms of cell growth, response to environmental stress, and ability to generate biofilms. Compared to the wild-type, the mutants exhibited lower resistance to oxidative stress. Further, strains deleted in yefM-yoeB and the double mutant lacking yefM-yoeB and relBE exhibited a significant reduction in their ability for biofilm formation. Complementation assays showed that defective phenotypes were restored to wild type levels. We conclude that these two loci may play a relevant role in these aspects of the S. pneumoniae lifestyle and contribute to the bacterial colonization of new niches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1439 KiB  
Review
Toxin-Antitoxin Systems of Staphylococcus aureus
by Christopher F. Schuster and Ralph Bertram
Toxins 2016, 8(5), 140; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8050140 - 5 May 2016
Cited by 65 | Viewed by 12912
Abstract
Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are small genetic elements found in the majority of prokaryotes. They encode toxin proteins that interfere with vital cellular functions and are counteracted by antitoxins. Dependent on the chemical nature of the antitoxins (protein or RNA) and how they control [...] Read more.
Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are small genetic elements found in the majority of prokaryotes. They encode toxin proteins that interfere with vital cellular functions and are counteracted by antitoxins. Dependent on the chemical nature of the antitoxins (protein or RNA) and how they control the activity of the toxin, TA systems are currently divided into six different types. Genes comprising the TA types I, II and III have been identified in Staphylococcus aureus. MazF, the toxin of the mazEF locus is a sequence-specific RNase that cleaves a number of transcripts, including those encoding pathogenicity factors. Two yefM-yoeB paralogs represent two independent, but auto-regulated TA systems that give rise to ribosome-dependent RNases. In addition, omega/epsilon/zeta constitutes a tripartite TA system that supposedly plays a role in the stabilization of resistance factors. The SprA1/SprA1AS and SprF1/SprG1 systems are post-transcriptionally regulated by RNA antitoxins and encode small membrane damaging proteins. TA systems controlled by interaction between toxin protein and antitoxin RNA have been identified in S. aureus in silico, but not yet experimentally proven. A closer inspection of possible links between TA systems and S. aureus pathophysiology will reveal, if these genetic loci may represent druggable targets. The modification of a staphylococcal TA toxin to a cyclopeptide antibiotic highlights the potential of TA systems as rather untapped sources of drug discovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Staphylococcus aureus Toxins)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

12 pages, 6656 KiB  
Article
Neutralization of Bacterial YoeBSpn Toxicity and Enhanced Plant Growth in Arabidopsis thaliana via Co-Expression of the Toxin-Antitoxin Genes
by Fauziah Abu Bakar, Chew Chieng Yeo and Jennifer Ann Harikrishna
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(4), 321; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17040321 - 20 Apr 2016
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5883
Abstract
Bacterial toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems have various cellular functions, including as part of the general stress response. The genome of the Gram-positive human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae harbors several putative TA systems, including yefM-yoeBSpn, which is one of four systems that had been [...] Read more.
Bacterial toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems have various cellular functions, including as part of the general stress response. The genome of the Gram-positive human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae harbors several putative TA systems, including yefM-yoeBSpn, which is one of four systems that had been demonstrated to be biologically functional. Overexpression of the yoeBSpn toxin gene resulted in cell stasis and eventually cell death in its native host, as well as in Escherichia coli. Our previous work showed that induced expression of a yoeBSpn toxin-Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) fusion gene apparently triggered apoptosis and was lethal in the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. In this study, we investigated the effects of co-expression of the yefMSpn antitoxin and yoeBSpn toxin-GFP fusion in transgenic A. thaliana. When co-expressed in Arabidopsis, the YefMSpn antitoxin was found to neutralize the toxicity of YoeBSpn-GFP. Interestingly, the inducible expression of both yefMSpn antitoxin and yoeBSpn toxin-GFP fusion in transgenic hybrid Arabidopsis resulted in larger rosette leaves and taller plants with a higher number of inflorescence stems and increased silique production. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a prokaryotic antitoxin neutralizing its cognate toxin in plant cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Toxicology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop