Search Results (18)

Background/Objectives: Enhanced monofocal and non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) aim to improve intermediate vision while maintaining contrast sensitivity. However, direct comparative evidence under both photopic and mesopic conditions remains limited. This study prospectively compared the visual performance of two enhanced monofocal IOLs (Tecnis^® Eyhance^™ and ISOPure^®) and one non-diffractive EDoF IOL (AcrySof^® IQ Vivity^™). Methods: Sixty patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery were implanted with one of three IOL groups (n = 20 each). Patients were assigned to one of three IOL groups based on preoperative consultation and clinical indications. One month postoperatively, monocular corrected distance (CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), and near visual acuity (DCNVA) were measured under photopic and mesopic conditions. Photopic defocus curves, contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions and correlation between pupil diameter and visual acuities were also assessed. Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable among groups. Under photopic conditions, Vivity^™ achieved significantly better UDVA, DCIVA and DCNVA than both Eyhance^™ and ISOPure^®. Under mesopic conditions, distance acuity did not differ significantly, but Vivity™ showed superior DCIVA and DCNVA. Defocus curves demonstrated a broader functional range of vision with Vivity™, while Eyhance^™ and ISOPure^® showed nearly overlapping profiles. Contrast sensitivity was similar among all IOLs under both lighting conditions, with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: The non-diffractive EDoF AcrySof^® IQ Vivity^™ provided a wider and more functional depth-of-focus than the enhanced monofocal lenses evaluated, without compromising contrast sensitivity. Eyhance^™ and ISOPure^® offered comparable performance, with good distance vision and modest depth-of-focus extension. All three IOLs maintained CS levels comparable to those typically reported for standard monofocal IOLs under both photopic and mesopic illumination, indicating no clinically relevant contrast penalty. Full article

Background/Objectives: Premium intraocular lenses (IOLs) are increasingly being selected for cataract and refractive lens surgery, but their functional performance depends critically on pupil size and corneal spherical aberration (SA). This study evaluates how these factors modulate the optical behavior of the RayOne EMV and Tecnis Synergy using a profilometry-based Through Object modulation transfer function (TO MTF) analysis. Methods: The surface profiles of the RayOne EMV and Tecnis Synergy were measured with a confocal optical profilometer and implemented in pseudophakic eye models via ray tracing. TO MTF at 50 cycles/mm was computed for object vergences from −4.0 D to +2.0 D over entrance pupil diameters from 2.0 to 5.5 mm in three corneal configurations derived from the Liou–Brennan model and ISO recommendations: mean population SA, aberration-free, and a myopic LASIK-like oblate cornea. Simulated optotype images were generated to relate TO MTF values to the expected distant, intermediate, and near visual performances. Results: RayOne EMV delivered high-quality distant image performance in all models. Its depth of focus increased only modestly and showed a strong dependence on pupil size. Intermediate and near vision rarely reached clinically acceptable levels. The Tecnis Synergy produced a broad depth-of-field plateau in distant to near visual performance for mean population spherical aberration at a 3.5 mm pupil. However, image quality at 90 cm remained limited. Optical performance worsened with increasing pupil size and positive spherical aberration, particularly under post-myopic LASIK conditions. Conclusions: The RayOne EMV behaves predominantly as a distance-oriented design with minimal true presbyopic benefit; the Tecnis Synergy provides a wider range of vision but is highly sensitive to corneal spherical aberration and pupil size, so thorough preoperative evaluation of corneal asphericity and functional pupil diameter is essential for IOL selection and power targeting. Full article

The objective of this study was to compare subjective manifest refraction with wavefront-based automated refraction using iTrace (ray tracing) and LadarWave (Hartmann–Shack) in eyes implanted with two enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and a standard aspheric monofocal IOL, emphasizing agreement and refractive variability across optical designs. This retrospective cohort included 84 eyes from 42 patients implanted with Tecnis Eyhance (DIB00), RayOne EMV (RAO200E), or Tecnis ZCB00 IOLs. Postoperative evaluation (1–3 months) included uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity and subjective manifest refraction, followed by automated refraction with iTrace and LadarWave. Outcomes were sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE). Agreement was assessed using mean signed difference, mean absolute error, root mean square error, Bland–Altman limits of agreement, proportions within clinically relevant thresholds, and vector astigmatism (J0, J45). Linear mixed-effect modeling evaluated SE differences across methods and IOL types while accounting for within-subject correlation. Subjective SE differed among IOLs (p = 0.027), with RAO200E more myopic than ZCB00 (−0.20 ± 0.32 D vs. −0.08 ± 0.44 D, p = 0.035). Automated refraction showed greater variability and poorer agreement in enhanced monofocal IOLs, particularly for cylinder and SE, with wider limits of agreement and fewer eyes within ±0.50 D compared with ZCB00. In mixed-effect contrasts (three-method repeated-measures model), iTrace and LadarWave showed a consistent myopic bias versus manifest refraction in DIB00 and RAO200E, whereas in ZCB00 the iTrace–manifest difference was not significant and LadarWave retained a significant myopic bias. Enhanced monofocal IOLs exhibit reduced agreement between wavefront-based automated and subjective manifest refraction compared with a standard aspheric monofocal IOL. Manifest refraction remains essential for postoperative assessment, and automated measurements should be interpreted as complementary, particularly in IOL designs that modify aberrations. Full article

Background/Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes following cataract surgery with implantation of a new partial depth of field (DOFi) intraocular lens (IOL) versus a monofocal IOL of identical material, platform, and haptic design. Methods: Single-center, non-randomized trial including 55 patients randomly assigned to be implanted either with the partial-DOFi IOL Tecnis PureSee (partial-DOFi group, 29 patients) or the Tecnis monofocal IOL DCB00/ZCU (both Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision) (monofocal group, 26 patients). Monocular visual acuity (VA), refractive, binocular defocus curve, and patient-reported outcomes (QoV and Catquest 9SF questionnaires) were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. Results: No significant differences between monofocal and partial-DOFi groups were found in monocular postoperative uncorrected- (0.03 ± 0.08 vs. 0.05 ± 0.10, p = 0.419) and corrected-distance VA (−0.03 ± 0.04 vs. −0.03 ± 0.05, p = 0.642). Significantly better distance-corrected intermediate VA was found in the partial-DOFi group (0.29 ± 0.08 vs. 0.10 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). Similarly, postoperative monocular distance-corrected near VA was better in the partial-DOFi group (0.51 ± 0.10 vs. 0.31 ± 0.09, p < 0.001). In the defocus curve, significantly better distance-corrected VAs compared to monofocal were found for all defocus levels from −1.50 to −4.00 D. Minor reports of starbursts were found in both IOL groups. With the Catquest questionnaire, some significant differences were found between groups including reduced difficulty reading newspapers (p < 0.001), improved visibility of prices while shopping (p < 0.001) and enhanced performance of hobbies (p = 0.030) and needlework (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The partial-DOFi IOL evaluated demonstrates superior intermediate and near visual performance compared to a monofocal IOL, while maintaining equivalent distance vision and visual quality. Full article

Objectives: To assess the anatomical lens position (ALP) predictability for a capsulotomy-fixated intraocular lens (IOL; FEMTIS FB-313, Teleon Surgical B.V) versus an intracapsular IOL (TECNIS 1-Piece, ZCB00V, Johnson & Johnson) implanted for age-related cataracts. Methods: Pre- and 3-month postoperative measurements from optical biometry and swept-source anterior segment OCT were analyzed. The lens position (i.e., postoperatively, ALP) was defined as the distance between the corneal endothelium and the lens equator. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models assessed the influence of preoperative biometric parameters on ALP, prediction error (PE), and absolute PE (AbsPE). Results: A total of 45 FEMTIS eyes from 32 patients and 26 TECNIS eyes from 18 patients were included. Postoperatively, the anterior chamber depth (ACD) increased by 1.10 mm in FEMTIS eyes and 1.66 mm in TECNIS eyes, while the lens position decreased by 0.59 mm and 0.34 mm, respectively. ACD and lens thickness (LT) were the strongest ALP predictors (ACD: β = +0.70, p < 0.0001; LT: β = +0.37, p < 0.0001). Separate multivariate models demonstrated strong predictive performance, with the FEMTIS achieving R² = 0.92 and the TECNIS IOL performing even better with R² = 0.97. In the FEMTIS group, LT influenced the PE (p = 0.006) and ACD the AbsPE (p = 0.005). In the TECNIS group, ACD influenced the PE (p < 0.0001), while AbsPE was not significantly affected by biometric parameters or formulas. Conclusions: ALP can be reliably predicted from standard biometric data, although less accurately for the FEMTIS IOL. Its anterior capsulotomy fixation likely compromises refractive accuracy with formulas inherently designed and optimized for in-the-bag IOLs, emphasizing the need for fixation-specific formula adjustments and dedicated optimization in capsulotomy-fixated IOLs. Full article

Background/Objectives: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of visual impairment in older adults and often coexists with cataracts. The indication of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) in these patients remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of a non-diffractive extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) IOL (LuxSmart™) compared to a monofocal plus IOL (Tecnis Eyhance™) in cataract patients with early-stage dry AMD. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 41 patients with early-stage AMD underwent bilateral cataract surgery with either LuxSmart™ or Tecnis Eyhance™ IOL implantation, targeting postoperative emmetropia. The eye selected for analysis was the first eye scheduled for surgery. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations included high and low-contrast distance visual acuity, intermediate and near visual acuity, defocus curves, ocular light scatter (halometry), and quality of life assessment (NEI VFQ-25). Postoperative biometric accuracy and refractive outcomes were also analyzed. Results: Both IOLs showed high refractive accuracy, with 100% of eyes within ±0.50 D of target. Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.10 ± 0.06 LogMAR for Eyhance and 0.07 ± 0.02 for LuxSmart (p = 0.06). Low contrast VA at 20% was 0.22 ± 0.11 (Eyhance) and 0.26 ± 0.16 (LuxSmart) (p = 0.49). Depth of focus was approximately 1.75 D for both lenses. Light scatter (LDI) improved postoperatively in both groups with no significant differences (p = 0.54). VFQ-25 scores showed improvement in daily activities, though no changes were observed in driving or mental health domains. Conclusions: Both lenses are safe and effective options for early AMD patients undergoing cataract surgery, providing good functional vision at multiple distances Full article

Background/Objectives: The Tecnis Eyhance is an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) designed to improve intermediate vision without compromising distance clarity or increasing the incidence of photic phenomena. Although short-term results have been encouraging, long-term data remain limited. This study presents the 5-year follow-up of a previously published 6-month clinical evaluation, aiming to assess the stability of visual, optical, and patient-reported outcomes over time. Methods: A single-center retrospective study of 18 patients (36 eyes) undergoing bilateral Tecnis Eyhance IOL implantation was conducted. The same cohort from the original 6-month study was re-evaluated after a mean follow-up of 5 years. Visual acuity (distance, intermediate, near), defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, optical quality, effective lens position (ELP), halo size, and patient-reported measures were assessed. Results: Visual acuity remained stable across all distances, with binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) ≤ 0.2 logMAR in all patients. No significant changes were observed in optical quality parameters or contrast sensitivity. ELP remained consistent over time (p = 0.298), and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) requiring Nd:YAG capsulotomy developed in 5% of the eyes. Halo size was mild, and subjective glare perception did not increase. Spectacle independence remained high for distance (100%) and intermediate (more than 75%) tasks. Conclusions: This 5-year follow-up study confirms the long-term stability and effectiveness of the Tecnis Eyhance IOL. These findings support its long-term use as a stable monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function. Full article

Background/Objectives: To assess the optical performance of two refractive premium IOLs across pupil sizes and values of corneal spherical aberration (SA). Methods: Two refractive IOLs were evaluated in this study: Tecnis Eyhance and Mini Well. The surface profiles were obtained to calculate the through-object MTF (TO MTF) curves and simulate optotype images. Entrance pupil sizes ranging from 2 to 5.5 and three corneal models were analyzed in the simulation: an average population aberrated cornea, an aberration-free cornea and a post-Lasik myopic cornea. Results: For Model 1 and pupil sizes between 3.0 and 3.5 mm, Mini Well provided acceptable visual quality from far to near distances, whereas Eyhance struggled to maintain visual quality at distances closer than intermediate. For patients with lower-than-normal corneal SA (i.e., more prolate corneas, such as post-hyperopic LASIK) both IOLs exhibited a hyperopic shift in far focus. Conversely, for patients with higher-than-normal corneal SA (i.e., more oblate corneas, such as post-myopic LASIK), the shift occurred in the myopic direction. Despite the implementation of an optimized IOL power to circumvent any shift, the TO MTF nevertheless reflected the interaction between corneal and IOL SA. Furthermore, the Mini Well demonstrated increased tolerance to less negative SA values, while Eyhance exhibited behavior consistent with a monofocal lens for more positive SA values. Conclusions: Surgeons should consider each patient’s corneal asphericity and typical pupil diameter when selecting and calculating the power of the premium IOLs studied, particularly in patients with a history of refractive surgery. Full article

Background/Objectives: Visual recovery after cataract surgery may be affected by lifestyle and environmental factors. This study aimed to investigate the association between daily outdoor activity and patient-reported visual outcomes after cataract surgery under perioperative management using cyclosporine and rebamipide. Methods: This retrospective study included 90 eyes from patients who underwent standardized cataract surgery with implantation of TECNIS Eyhance intraocular lenses. Patients were divided into two groups based on their average daily outdoor activity during the first postoperative month: Group 1 (≤3 h/day) and Group 2 (>3 h/day). Postoperative assessments included Cataract-related Visual Function Questionnaire (CVFQ) scores, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, and ocular surface parameters such as tear breakup time, Oxford score, SICCA score, and OSDI. Results: Group 1 reported significantly higher CVFQ scores for daytime (p = 0.020) and night-time driving (p = 0.037) compared to Group 2, indicating lower levels of visual discomfort in these tasks. No significant differences were observed between the groups for other CVFQ subcategories or ocular surface parameters. Conclusions: Except for driving-related discomfort, no significant differences were found in CVFQ scores between the groups. No difference in ocular surface parameters can be attributed to the perioperative management using cyclosporine and rebamipide. CVFQ may be a useful tool for assessing subjective visual outcomes after cataract surgery. Full article

Purpose: A novel enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) has been developed to improve functional intermediate vision, maintaining a distance vision comparable to a standard monofocal lens and avoiding the drawbacks of multifocal IOLs. The aim of this study is to perform optical bench analysis and to evaluate refractive and visual outcomes and patient satisfaction. Methods: This prospective comparative single-center study was conducted in Careggi Hospital, University of Florence (Italy). We included 100 eyes from 50 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery. One group received the standard monofocal Tecnis GCB00 IOL, while the other group received the novel enhanced monofocal Evolux IOL. We evaluated binocular visual and refractive outcomes at 6 months after surgery. Binocular defocus curves and contrast sensitivity (CS) were also assessed. Optical quality was also analyzed in terms of higher-order aberrations (HOAs), modulation transfer function (MTF), objective scatter index (OSI), Strehl ratio, effective lens position (ELP), and halo analysis. A Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ) was performed to assess spectacle independence outcomes. Finally, we analyzed the optical bench of both lenses. Results: All eyes implanted with Evolux achieved excellent distance vision, comparable to that achieved with GCB00. Evolux showed better intermediate and near vision, without any loss of visual quality, contrast sensitivity, or the presence of halos and photic phenomena. The optical bench analysis confirmed the different optical properties of the two lenses and supported the behavior obtained with the clinical defocus curve. Conclusions: These preliminary results show good refractive accuracy and visual outcomes for the enhanced monofocal IOL Evolux after cataract surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings in terms of the number of patients and the period of follow-up. Full article

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical performance and optical quality of a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL), Asqelio™ EDOF (models ETLIO130C/ETPIO130C), in patients undergoing cataract surgery or refractive lensectomy. Methods: This prospective observational, case-control study included patients bilaterally implanted with either the Asqelio™ EDOF IOL (Study Group) or the spherical monofocal TECNIS^® 1-Piece ZCB00 IOL (Control Group). The postoperative outcomes—at 3 months after surgery—included visual acuities at multiple distances, refraction, contrast sensitivity, the optical scatter index (OSI), wavefront aberrations, and patient-reported outcomes (Catquest-9SF and a quality-of-vision questionnaire). Results: Twenty-three patients (46 eyes) in the Asqelio™ EDOF group and 17 patients (34 eyes) in the monofocal control group were enrolled. Postoperatively, 91% of eyes in the EDOF group were within ±0.50 D of the intended spherical equivalent. The binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities were 0.00 ± 0.09, 0.13 ± 0.12, and 0.32 ± 0.15 logMAR, respectively. Contrast sensitivity and OSI values were similar between the study and control groups (p > 0.05). Higher-order aberrations were significantly lower in the EDOF group (p < 0.001), but values in both groups were clinically low. No adverse events were reported. Most patients expressed high satisfaction and reported few visual disturbances. Conclusions: The Asqelio™ EDOF IOL provided good refractive predictability, effective uncorrected vision across distance and intermediate ranges, and high patient satisfaction. Contrast sensitivity and optical scatter were comparable to monofocal implants. This lens can be considered a valuable option for patients seeking an extended range of functional vision with minimal side effects. Full article

Objectives: This laboratory study aims to assess the effects of misaligning different trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) under varying spectral and corneal spherical aberration (SA) conditions. Methods: With an IOL metrology device under monochromatic and polychromatic conditions, the following models were studied: AT ELANA 841P, AT LISA Tri 839MP, FineVision HP POD F, Acrysof IQ PanOptix, and Tecnis Synergy ZFR00V. The SA was simulated using an aberration-free and average-SA cornea. The modulation transfer function (MTF) was measured at different pupil sizes for the on- and off-axis lens positions. Results: The IOLs exhibited varying responses to decentration up to 1 mm, showing the lowest impact in polychromatic light. The least affected was AT ELANA, with an MTF loss of 15.7% to 28.4% at 50 lp/mm across the studied conditions. It was followed by PanOptix and FineVision, with the MTF loss ranging from 19.1% to 36.0% and from 21.2% to 46.6%. AT LISA showed a more substantial reduction, i.e., 41.2% to 64.8%, but it was still lower than that of Synergy (51.1% to 78.8%). When decentration was induced at a 4.5 mm distance, its effect was more evident in conditions that were closer to each IOL’s SA correction. A tilt of 5° had a lesser impact than 1 mm decentration, with the effect being more severe at 4.5 mm. Conclusions: The off-axis position affects the optical quality of trifocal IOLs. Low- rather than high-SA-correcting trifocals perform better under misalignment. In polychromatic light, the impact of misalignment is less evident, suggesting a potential mitigating effect of chromatic aberration. Full article

Background: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction after implantation of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (TECNIS Eyhance ICB00) in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) who underwent cataract surgery with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, comparative study. In total, 61 eyes of 61 patients with idiopathic ERM and cataracts were included. We measured the uncorrected near and intermediate visual acuity (UNVA and UIVA), uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), central macular thickness, defocus curves, and contrast sensitivity 3–6 months after the surgery. Overall patient satisfaction was assessed using a questionnaire at the 1-month follow-up visit. Results: The ICB00 group showed better near and intermediate visual acuity than the monofocal group (TECNIS ZCB00); however, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups. The ICB00 group exhibited wider defocus curves at near to far distances (−3.0 to +2.0 D) than the ZCB00 group. There were no significant differences in the results of the contrast sensitivity test, dysphotopsia, spectacle dependence, or patient satisfaction between the two groups. Conclusions: In combined PPV and cataract surgery for ERM patients, ICB00 resulted in good visual acuity with a smoother defocus curve compared to the ZCB00 group. Full article

This study compares the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of three intraocular implants (IOL): Tecnis Synergy IOL, AcrySof IQ PanOptix Trifocal, and Tecnis Symfony EDOF IOL. Participants achieving 20/20 or better uncorrected binocular visual acuity were as follows: Synergy—67% distance, 64% intermediate, and 47% near; PanOptix—73% distance, 73% intermediate, and 50% near; and Symfony—63% distance, 75% intermediate, and 22% near. Symfony demonstrated superior intermediate visual acuity compared to Synergy (p = 0.0182) for those achieving 20/25 or better. Both Synergy and PanOptix showed superiority over Symfony for near visual acuity (p < 0.0001). Halos were statistically more common in Synergy participants compared to PanOptix (p = 0.0013) and Symfony (p < 0.0001). Each trial lens outperformed its monofocal IOL in terms of independence from glasses or contacts, with Synergy and PanOptix showing statistical significance over Symfony. Comparing contrast sensitivities and defocus curves was challenging due to data variance and as such, standardization of United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) data reporting is key for better comparison of outcomes among different IOL platforms. Full article

The purpose of this study was to compare the visual performance and optical quality between three new enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). This retrospective study included patients affected by cataracts with corneal astigmatism less than 0.75 D and no ocular comorbidities who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of Tecnis Eyhance ICB00 (Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Jacksonville, FL, USA), Vivinex Impress XY1-EM (Hoya Surgical Optics, Singapore) or IsoPure 123 (PhysIOL, Liege, Belgium) IOLs. Three months postoperatively, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distant, and intermediate and near visual acuities were measured. Binocular defocus curve, photopic contrast sensitivity, Point Spread Function (PSF), low order aberrations (LOAs), high order aberrations (HOAs), objective scatter index (OSI), halo and glare perception were also evaluated. This study included a total of 72 eyes from 36 patients. Visual acuity outcomes, PSF, LOAs, HOAs and OSI were similar between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of photopic contrast sensitivity, halo or glare perception. In patients without ocular comorbidities, the Eyhance ICB00 IOL, the Vivinex Impress IOL and the Isopure IOL—even though based on different optical properties—provided similar results in terms of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and intraocular aberrations, with no influence on photic phenomena. Full article