Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (5)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Sputnik light

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 4708 KB  
Article
Receptor Binding Domain-Specific B Cell Memory Responses Among Individuals Vaccinated Against SARS-CoV-2
by Atharv Athavale, Anmol Gaur, Nafees Ahmed, Adarsh Subramaniam, Jyotsna Dandotiya, Sneha Raj, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, Sweety Samal, Anil Kumar Pandey, Ramesh Chandra Rai and Amit Awasthi
Vaccines 2024, 12(12), 1396; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12121396 - 12 Dec 2024
Viewed by 3003
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unprecedented vaccine development efforts against SARS-CoV-2. India, which was one of the countries most impacted by COVID-19, developed its indigenous vaccine in addition to utilizing the ones developed by other countries. While antibody levels and neutralizing antibody [...] Read more.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic prompted unprecedented vaccine development efforts against SARS-CoV-2. India, which was one of the countries most impacted by COVID-19, developed its indigenous vaccine in addition to utilizing the ones developed by other countries. While antibody levels and neutralizing antibody titres are considered initial correlates of immune protection, long-term protection from the pathogen relies on memory B and T cells and their recall responses. In this regard, global research has primarily focused on mRNA-based vaccines. The studies on immune memory response, particularly B cell memory response induced by the vaccines given to Indians, remain relatively obscure. Methods: We assessed Receptor Binding Domain-specific memory B cells in the peripheral circulation and their ability to secrete antigen-specific antibodies among Indians vaccinated with Covaxin (BBV152), Covishield (AZD1222), Corbevax (BECOV2D), and Sputnik Light, as well as unvaccinated individuals. Results: Corbevax and Sputnik Light conferred better antibody-secreting cell (ASC) responses over time compared to other groups. Conclusions: These findings contribute to our understanding of vaccine-induced immune memory in the Indian population; providing insights that could inform future vaccine strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 1287 KB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Responses across Global and Lesser-Studied Vaccines
by José Victor Zambrana, Carlos Saenz, Hannah E. Maier, Mayling Brenes, Andrea Nuñez, Anita Matamoros, Mabel Hernández, Keyla Dumas, Cristhian Toledo, Leonardo Peralta, Aubree Gordon and Angel Balmaseda
Vaccines 2024, 12(3), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12030326 - 19 Mar 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4059
Abstract
Few data are available on antibody response for some SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and there is a lack of ability to compare vaccine responses in the same population. This cross-sectional study conducted in Nicaragua examines the SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in individuals, previously exposed to high [...] Read more.
Few data are available on antibody response for some SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, and there is a lack of ability to compare vaccine responses in the same population. This cross-sectional study conducted in Nicaragua examines the SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in individuals, previously exposed to high infection rates who have received various vaccines. The vaccines under comparison include well-known ones like Pfizer (BNT162b2) and AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1-S), alongside less-studied vaccines including Soberana (Soberana 02), Abdala (CIGB-66), and Sputnik V/Sputnik Light. Overall, 3195 individuals participated, with 2862 vaccinated and 333 unvaccinated. We found that 95% of the unvaccinated were seropositive, with much lower titers than the vaccinated. Among the vaccinated, we found that Soberana recipients mounted the highest anti-spike response (mean difference (MD) = 36,498.8 [20,312.2, 52,685.5]), followed by Abdala (MD = 25,889.9 [10,884.1, 40,895.7]), BNT162b2 (MD = 12,967.2 [7543.7, 18,390.8]) and Sputnik with AstraZeneca as the reference group, adjusting for age, sex, vaccine status, days after last dose, and self-reported COVID-19. In addition, we found that subjects with complete vaccination series had higher antibody magnitude than those with incomplete series. Overall, we found no evidence of waning in the antibody magnitude across vaccines. Our study supports the conclusion that populations with high infection rates still benefit substantially from vaccination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1343 KB  
Article
Revaccination in Age-Risk Groups with Sputnik V Is Immunologically Effective and Depends on the Initial Neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies Level
by Mikhail A. Godkov, Darya A. Ogarkova, Vladimir A. Gushchin, Denis A. Kleymenov, Elena P. Mazunina, Evgeniia N. Bykonia, Andrei A. Pochtovyi, Valeriy V. Shustov, Dmitry V. Shcheblyakov, Andrey G. Komarov, Alexander N. Tsibin, Vladimir I. Zlobin, Denis Y. Logunov and Alexander L. Gintsburg
Vaccines 2023, 11(1), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11010090 - 30 Dec 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4778
Abstract
Vaccination against COVID-19 has occurred in Russia for more than two years. According to the Russian official clinical guidelines to maintain tense immunity in the conditions of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to use booster immunization six months after primary vaccination [...] Read more.
Vaccination against COVID-19 has occurred in Russia for more than two years. According to the Russian official clinical guidelines to maintain tense immunity in the conditions of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to use booster immunization six months after primary vaccination or a previous COVID-19 contraction. It is especially important to ensure the maintenance of protective immunity in the elderly, who are at risk of severe courses of COVID-19. Meanwhile, the immunological effectiveness of the booster doses has not been sufficiently substantiated. To investigate the immunogenicity of Sputnik V within the recommended revaccination regimen and evaluate the effectiveness of booster doses, we conducted this study on 3983 samples obtained from individuals previously vaccinated with Sputnik V in Moscow. We analyzed the level of antibodies in BAU/mL three times: (i) six months after primary immunization immediately before the booster (RV), (ii) 3 weeks after the introduction of the first component of the booster (RV1), and (iii) 3 weeks after the introduction of the second component of the booster (RV2). Six months after the primary vaccination with Sputnik V, 95.5% of patients maintained a positive level of IgG antibodies to the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2. The degree of increase in the specific virus-neutralizing antibodies level after revaccination increased with a decrease in their initial level just before the booster dose application. In the group of people with the level of antibodies up to 100 BAU/mL six months after the vaccination, a more than eightfold increase (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon criterion with Bonferroni adjustment) in the level of specific antibodies was observed (Me = 8.84 (IQR: 3.63–30.61)). A significant increase in the IgG level after receiving both the first and the second booster doses occurred at the initial titer level up to 300 BAU/ mL (p < 0.001) in those who did not contract COVID-19 in the past and up to 100 BAU/mL (p < 0.001) in those who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. A significant increase in the antibody level after the first dose of the booster was noted for people who had up to 500 BAU/mL (p < 0.05), regardless of the previous COVID-19 infection. Thus, revaccination is most effective in individuals with an antibody level below 500 BAU/mL, regardless of the vaccinee age and COVID-19 contraction. For the first time, it has been shown that a single booster dose of the Sputnik vaccine is sufficient to form a protective immunity in most vaccinees regardless of age and preexisting antibody level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibody Response of Vaccines to SARS-CoV-2)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1007 KB  
Article
Sputnik Light and Sputnik V Vaccination Is Effective at Protecting Medical Personnel from COVID-19 during the Period of Delta Variant Dominance
by Gennady T. Sukhikh, Tatiana V. Priputnevich, Darya A. Ogarkova, Andrei A. Pochtovyi, Daria D. Kustova, Vladimir I. Zlobin, Denis Y. Logunov, Vladimir A. Gushchin and Alexander L. Gintsburg
Vaccines 2022, 10(11), 1804; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10111804 - 26 Oct 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4078
Abstract
Medical personnel are a group of people that often encounter infectious agents, leading to greater risk of contracting infectious diseases. Specific prevention of diseases in this group is a priority. The epidemiological effectiveness of COVID-19 prevention in the group of medical workers due [...] Read more.
Medical personnel are a group of people that often encounter infectious agents, leading to greater risk of contracting infectious diseases. Specific prevention of diseases in this group is a priority. The epidemiological effectiveness of COVID-19 prevention in the group of medical workers due to the emergence of new variants of concern of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been studied in sufficient depth. We conducted a study of the effectiveness of vaccine use to protect medical workers at a large medical center for obstetrics and gynecology in Moscow. Sputnik V and Sputnik Light were the main vaccines used for the prevention of COVID-19. The vaccines are based on a variant of the S-protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, with adenovirus serotypes 5 and 26 as the vector for delivery. Vaccination of employees occurred during the period in which the Delta variant was spreading. The overall epidemiological effectiveness was 81.7% (73.1–87.6%) during the period in which the Delta variant was dominant. During the period from the beginning of vaccination (26 November 2020) until 8 February 2022, the overall effectiveness was 89.1% (86.9–91.0%). As expected, the highest effectiveness during this period was obtained in the group that received the third and fourth doses—96.5% (75.0–99.5%). The severity of COVID-19 in the vaccinated group was significantly lower than in the unvaccinated group. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccine Design, Development, and Delivery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1264 KB  
Article
Sputnik V Effectiveness against Hospitalization with COVID-19 during Omicron Dominance
by Andrey S. Shkoda, Vladimir A. Gushchin, Darya A. Ogarkova, Svetlana V. Stavitskaya, Olga E. Orlova, Nadezhda A. Kuznetsova, Elena N. Keruntu, Andrei A. Pochtovyi, Alexander V. Pukhov, Denis A. Kleymenov, Vasyli G. Krzhanovsky, Daria V. Vasina, Nataliya V. Shkuratova, Elena V. Shidlovskaya, Alexey L. Gorbunov, Daria D. Kustova, Evgeniya A. Mazurina, Sofya R. Kozlova, Alexandra V. Soboleva, Igor V. Grigoriev, Lyudmila L. Pankratyeva, Alina S. Odintsova, Elizaveta D. Belyaeva, Arina A. Bessonova, Lyudmila A. Vasilchenko, Igor P. Lupu, Ruslan R. Adgamov, Artem P. Tkachuk, Elizaveta A. Tokarskaya, Denis Y. Logunov and Alexander L. Gintsburgadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2022, 10(6), 938; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10060938 - 13 Jun 2022
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 10932
Abstract
Mass vaccination campaigns against COVID-19 affected more than 90% of the population in most developed countries. The new epidemiologic wave of COVID-19 has been ongoing since the end of 2021. It is caused by a virus variant B.1.1.529, also known as “Omicron” and [...] Read more.
Mass vaccination campaigns against COVID-19 affected more than 90% of the population in most developed countries. The new epidemiologic wave of COVID-19 has been ongoing since the end of 2021. It is caused by a virus variant B.1.1.529, also known as “Omicron” and its descendants. The effectiveness of major vaccines against Omicron is not known. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Sputnik V vaccine. The main goal is to assess its protection against hospitalization in the period of Omicron dominance. We conducted our study based on a large clinical center in Moscow (Russia) where 1112 patients were included. We used the case-population method to perform the calculations. The data we obtained indicate that the Omicron variant causes at least 90% of infections in the studied cohort. The effectiveness of protection against hospitalization with COVID-19 in our study was 85.9% (95% CI 83.0–88.0%) for those who received more than one dose. It was 87.6% (95% CI 85.4–89.5%) and 97.0% (95% CI 95.9–97.8%) for those who received more than two or three doses. The effectiveness in cases of more severe forms was higher than for less severe ones. Thus, present study indicates the high protective efficacy of vaccination against hospitalization with COVID-19 in case of Omicron lineage. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop