Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = MRD clinical application in CRC

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
28 pages, 711 KB  
Review
Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Circulating Tumor DNA for Molecular Residual Disease Assessment and Early Treatment Monitoring
by Kamil Safiejko, Marcin Juchimiuk, Jacek Pierko, Maciej Maslyk, Mateusz Mucha, Mariusz Koda, Luiza Konczuga-Koda, Sebastian Radej, Adem Akcakaya and Lukasz Szarpak
Cancers 2026, 18(6), 1014; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18061014 - 20 Mar 2026
Viewed by 1364
Abstract
Background: Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is rapidly reshaping gastrointestinal (GI) oncology. The highest-impact applications are molecular residual disease (mRD) detection after curative-intent therapy and early recognition of progression or resistance during systemic treatment. Methods: We performed a structured, clinically oriented [...] Read more.
Background: Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is rapidly reshaping gastrointestinal (GI) oncology. The highest-impact applications are molecular residual disease (mRD) detection after curative-intent therapy and early recognition of progression or resistance during systemic treatment. Methods: We performed a structured, clinically oriented narrative synthesis by using explicit search, eligibility, evidence prioritization, and clinical interpretation rules, integrating landmark prospective cohorts, randomized ctDNA-guided strategy trials where available, meta-analyses, key methodological research (e.g., pre-analytics, assay design, and clonal hematopoiesis (CH)/clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP)), and selected trial registries. Results: In resected colorectal cancer (CRC), postoperative ctDNA positivity is among the strongest known biomarkers of recurrence risk; large prospective studies demonstrate clear separation of disease-free survival (DFS)/overall survival (OS) between mRD+ and mRD− patients. In stage II colon cancer, randomized data (DYNAMIC) show that a ctDNA-guided strategy reduces adjuvant chemotherapy exposure without compromising long-term outcomes. In metastatic CRC, ctDNA supports early response monitoring and resistance tracking; ctDNA-selected anti-EGFR rechallenge provides a model of biomarker-driven actionability (CHRONOS). In gastroesophageal cancers, longitudinal ctDNA dynamics correlate with relapse risk and treatment efficacy, and in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, ctDNA after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy informs residual disease risk and adjuvant stratification. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and hepatobiliary malignancies, sensitivity is constrained by low shedding and background cell-free DNA (cfDNA), yet ctDNA positivity remains clinically meaningful, and emerging data in resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (STAMP-linked analyses) show that ctDNA dynamics during adjuvant therapy predict recurrence. Conclusions: ctDNA is a clinically validated biomarker for mRD in CRC, whereas in other GI cancers, it remains a promising but methodologically heterogeneous tool whose clinical utility is tumor- and context-dependent. The next phase requires interventional trials demonstrating outcome improvement, harmonized sampling and reporting standards, and rigorous control of confounders (notably CH/CHIP). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1440 KB  
Review
Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Minimal Residual Disease and Its Application in Colorectal Cancer
by Oluseyi Abidoye, Daniel H. Ahn, Mitesh J. Borad, Christina Wu, Tanios Bekaii-Saab, Sakti Chakrabarti and Mohamad Bassam Sonbol
Cells 2025, 14(3), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14030161 - 22 Jan 2025
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 13855
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a heterogeneous group of diseases that imposes a considerable global and national health burden. Although most CRC patients are diagnosed at an early stage and undergo potentially curative treatment, a significant proportion experience recurrence. Currently, adjuvant chemotherapy decisions are [...] Read more.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a heterogeneous group of diseases that imposes a considerable global and national health burden. Although most CRC patients are diagnosed at an early stage and undergo potentially curative treatment, a significant proportion experience recurrence. Currently, adjuvant chemotherapy decisions are primarily based on clinicopathological characteristics, which have well-recognized limitations in accurately identifying patients harboring minimal residual disease (MRD), often resulting in unnecessary chemotherapy exposure. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising surrogate marker for MRD, offering a more precise approach to identifying patients at risk of recurrence after curative-intent surgery and refining adjuvant chemotherapy decisions. Growing evidence from multiple studies has demonstrated that ctDNA outperforms traditional clinicopathological factors as a marker for MRD. This review synthesizes key studies supporting the role of ctDNA in MRD detection for CRC patients and evaluates clinical trials investigating the application of ctDNA in guiding adjuvant therapy decisions. This emerging strategy holds the potential to transform the adjuvant treatment paradigm in colorectal cancer by optimizing therapeutic precision and minimizing unnecessary treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Status and Future Challenges of Liquid Biopsy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1408 KB  
Review
Mutational Signatures in Colorectal Cancer: Translational Insights, Clinical Applications, and Limitations
by Giovanni Crisafulli
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 2956; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172956 - 24 Aug 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4727
Abstract
A multitude of exogenous and endogenous processes have the potential to result in DNA damage. While the repair mechanisms are typically capable of correcting this damage, errors in the repair process can result in mutations. The findings of research conducted in 2012 indicate [...] Read more.
A multitude of exogenous and endogenous processes have the potential to result in DNA damage. While the repair mechanisms are typically capable of correcting this damage, errors in the repair process can result in mutations. The findings of research conducted in 2012 indicate that mutations do not occur randomly but rather follow specific patterns that can be attributed to known or inferred mutational processes. The process of mutational signature analysis allows for the inference of the predominant mutational process for a given cancer sample, with significant potential for clinical applications. A deeper comprehension of these mutational signatures in CRC could facilitate enhanced prevention strategies, facilitate the comprehension of genotoxic drug activity, predict responses to personalized treatments, and, in the future, inform the development of targeted therapies in the context of precision oncology. The efforts of numerous researchers have led to the identification of several mutational signatures, which can be categorized into different mutational signature references. In CRC, distinct mutational signatures are identified as correlating with mismatch repair deficiency, polymerase mutations, and chemotherapy treatment. In this context, a mutational signature analysis offers considerable potential for enhancing minimal residual disease (MRD) tests in stage II (high-risk) and stage III CRC post-surgery, stratifying CRC based on the impacts of genetic and epigenetic alterations for precision oncology, identifying potential therapeutic vulnerabilities, and evaluating drug efficacy and guiding therapy, as illustrated in a proof-of-concept clinical trial. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 628 KB  
Review
Harnessing Minimal Residual Disease as a Predictor for Colorectal Cancer: Promising Horizons Amidst Challenges
by Xiaofen Wen, Donatella Coradduzza, Jiaxin Shen, Antonio Mario Scanu, Maria Rosaria Muroni, Matteo Massidda, Vincenzo Rallo, Ciriaco Carru, Andrea Angius and Maria Rosaria De Miglio
Medicina 2023, 59(10), 1886; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59101886 - 23 Oct 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3584
Abstract
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) detection has emerged as an independent factor in clinical and pathological cancer assessment offering a highly effective method for predicting recurrence in colorectal cancer (CRC). The ongoing research initiatives such as the DYNAMIC and CIRCULATE-Japan studies, have revealed the [...] Read more.
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) detection has emerged as an independent factor in clinical and pathological cancer assessment offering a highly effective method for predicting recurrence in colorectal cancer (CRC). The ongoing research initiatives such as the DYNAMIC and CIRCULATE-Japan studies, have revealed the potential of MRD detection based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to revolutionize management for CRC patients. MRD detection represents an opportunity for risk stratification, treatment guidance, and early relapse monitoring. Here we overviewed the evolving landscape of MRD technology and its promising applications through the most up-to-date research and reviews, underscoring the transformative potential of this approach. Our primary focus is to provide a point-to-point perspective and address key challenges relating to the adoption of ctDNA-based MRD detection in the clinical setting. By identifying critical areas of interest and hurdles surrounding clinical significance, detection criteria, and potential applications of basic research, this article offers insights into the advancements needed to evaluate the role of ctDNA in CRC MRD detection, contributing to favorable clinical options and improved outcomes in the management of CRC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutic Landscapes in Colorectal Carcinoma: Part II)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop