Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Kids’ Menus

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 277 KB  
Article
Restaurants Offering Healthier Kids’ Menus: A Mixed-Methods Study
by Tim A. van Kuppeveld, Bernadette J. Janssen and Kirsten E. Bevelander
Nutrients 2025, 17(10), 1639; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17101639 - 10 May 2025
Viewed by 2483
Abstract
Introduction: The food environment is an important determinant of children’s eating behavior. Improving the environment to encourage healthier choices is crucial to prevent obesity, especially in restaurants where the majority of kids’ menus are unhealthy. This study explored the perceptions, attitudes, motivations, influencing [...] Read more.
Introduction: The food environment is an important determinant of children’s eating behavior. Improving the environment to encourage healthier choices is crucial to prevent obesity, especially in restaurants where the majority of kids’ menus are unhealthy. This study explored the perceptions, attitudes, motivations, influencing factors, and opportunities of restaurant owners, managers, and chefs for implementing healthier kids’ menus in Dutch restaurants. Method: We used a mixed methods design in two consecutive study parts. Part I consisted of an online unstandardized questionnaire that was completed by 44 restaurant owners, 26 chefs, 18 managers, and 6 other restaurant employees (n = 94). This was followed by semi-structured interviews with 3 restaurant owners, 2 chefs, and 1 manager, to gather exploratory information in Part II (n = 6). The quantitative data were categorized into three groups: restaurants without kids’ menus (n = 18), restaurants with unhealthy kids’ menus (n = 24), and restaurants with (partially) healthy kids’ menus (n = 52). Group differences were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. We used thematic analysis for the interviews. Results: Parts I and II showed that the restaurant sector is aware of the need, and willing and motivated to offer healthier kids’ menus. Nevertheless, the concerns about food waste, the unhealthy demand from children and parents, and seeing eating out as a free pass to consume unhealthy meals by children and parents were important factors limiting the implementation of healthier kids’ menus. Discussion: We discussed potential solutions to enhance demand and acceptance of healthier kids’ menus, such as attractive names, storytelling, offering children’s portions based on adult menus, and using participatory approaches in which parents, children, and chefs co-create meal composition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
15 pages, 2398 KB  
Article
Children’s Menus at Fast Food Restaurants on the Uber Eats® Delivery App
by Andrea Zapata-Quiroga, João P. M. Lima, Ada Rocha, Silvana Saavedra-Clarke and Samuel Durán-Agüero
Foods 2025, 14(3), 434; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14030434 - 29 Jan 2025
Viewed by 4222
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the offer of children’s menus offered in fast food restaurants present in the Uber Eats delivery application through the Kids Menu Healthy Score ‘KIMEHS’ in Greater Santiago. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional. Research in fast food restaurants present in the Uber [...] Read more.
Objectives: To evaluate the offer of children’s menus offered in fast food restaurants present in the Uber Eats delivery application through the Kids Menu Healthy Score ‘KIMEHS’ in Greater Santiago. Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional. Research in fast food restaurants present in the Uber Eats delivery app. A total of 858 restaurants were selected. The KIMEHS was used to assess menu quality. KIMEHS index and descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: 558 restaurants were evaluated through the app; 57 offered children’s menus, yielding 114 children’s menu options from 18 different municipalities. The common offer was based on fried and/or processed lean meat accompanied by French fries in 71%. Moreover, 99% of the menus assessed obtained the minimum score in the KIMEHS placing them in the ‘not healthy at all’ category. When associations were made between foods and the lowest KIMEHS score quartile, the presence of chips had the strongest association (OR; 40.36: CI95% 11.43–201.08). Conclusions: Most restaurants offer a children’s menu of low nutritional quality and poor balance, where their dishes are commonly based on fried and processed products, pointing to the urgent need for legislation on guidelines to be applied on the different actors influencing the food offered to children. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Habits, Nutritional Knowledge, and Nutrition Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 270 KB  
Article
Nutrient Content and Compliance with Sodium Standards in Elementary School Meals in the United States Pre- and Post-COVID-19
by Leah Elizabeth Chapman, Scott Richardson, Amanda A. Harb, Evan Fear, Tara P. Daly, Deborah A. Olarte, Meghan Hawley, Emelia Zukowski, Colin Schwartz, Meghan Maroney and Juliana F. W. Cohen
Nutrients 2022, 14(24), 5386; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245386 - 19 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 5592
Abstract
Various federal policies have weakened school meal nutrition standards in the United States since the passage of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act in 2010, including temporary school meal nutrition waivers to promote post-COVID-19 pandemic recovery. This study used school menu and nutrient data [...] Read more.
Various federal policies have weakened school meal nutrition standards in the United States since the passage of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act in 2010, including temporary school meal nutrition waivers to promote post-COVID-19 pandemic recovery. This study used school menu and nutrient data from a nationally representative sample of 128 elementary school districts to examine differences in nutrients (average calories, total fat, saturated fat, sodium, total sugar, and fiber) and alignment with United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) sodium targets in 2019 (pre-pandemic) and in 2022 (post-pandemic). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance accounting for repeated measures within school districts, adjusting for geographic region and urbanicity. Small differences in the nutrient content for both breakfast and lunch were observed between 2019 and 2022. Most weeks met USDA sodium Target 1 for breakfast (≥95% of weeks) and Target 1 (≥96% of weeks) and Target 1A for lunch (≥92% of weeks) in both 2019 and 2022, although compliance decreased slightly when condiments were included. Additionally, meals provided on average 57 g of total sugar. Overall, many meals are already in alignment with lower sodium targets. Simple strategies, such as offering lower sodium condiments, can further reduce sodium in school meals. The total sugar levels observed highlight that the USDA should consider limits on added sugars in school meals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue School Meals and Children’s Dietary Behaviour)
10 pages, 258 KB  
Article
Dietary Intake among Children Attending Childcare Centers: Impact of the New CACFP Meal Guidelines
by Jayna M. Dave, Tzuan A. Chen, Maha Almohamad and Sonia Cotto-Moreno
Nutrients 2022, 14(16), 3394; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14163394 - 18 Aug 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3302
Abstract
Through the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, USDA (US Department of Agriculture) made the first major changes in the CACFP (Child and Adult Care Food Program) meal and snack menu patterns. Childcare centers that serve low-income families qualify to participate and receive [...] Read more.
Through the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, USDA (US Department of Agriculture) made the first major changes in the CACFP (Child and Adult Care Food Program) meal and snack menu patterns. Childcare centers that serve low-income families qualify to participate and receive reimbursement for meals and snacks served. The purpose of this study was to assess what changes in children’s dietary behaviors occurred as a result of the new CACFP meal pattern requirements. This study evaluated these changes at childcare centers operating in Houston and San Antonio, Texas, USA, areas enrolled in the CACFP, pre- (Spring 2016) and post-implementation (Fall 2016–Spring 2017) of the new meal patterns. Dietary intake was assessed via observations of children, 3–5 years old, conducted at breakfast, lunch, and snack times. Results showed improvements in adjusted means of several nutrients and food groups consumption, post-implementation of new CACFP meal guidelines compared to baseline, specifically intake of whole grains, milk, and juice. Additional studies are needed to confirm the impact of the revised CACFP meal patterns along with strategies to assist providers in meeting the new standards to increase the access to and intake of items in accordance with the CACFP meal pattern requirements in childcare settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue School-Based Eating Interventions—Are Students Eating Healthily?)
14 pages, 326 KB  
Article
The Nutritional Quality of Kids’ Menus from Cafés and Restaurants: An Australian Cross-Sectional Study
by Gina S. A. Trapp, Claire E. Pulker, Miriam Hurworth, Kristy K. Law, Sally Brinkman, Christina M. Pollard, Amelia J. Harray, Ros Sambell, Joelie Mandzufas, Stephanie Anzman-Frasca and Siobhan Hickling
Nutrients 2022, 14(13), 2741; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14132741 - 30 Jun 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5476
Abstract
Australian families increasingly rely on eating foods from outside the home, which increases intake of energy-dense nutrient-poor foods. ‘Kids’ Menus’ are designed to appeal to families and typically lack healthy options. However, the nutritional quality of Kids’ Menus from cafes and full-service restaurants [...] Read more.
Australian families increasingly rely on eating foods from outside the home, which increases intake of energy-dense nutrient-poor foods. ‘Kids’ Menus’ are designed to appeal to families and typically lack healthy options. However, the nutritional quality of Kids’ Menus from cafes and full-service restaurants (as opposed to fast-food outlets) has not been investigated in Australia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional quality of Kids’ Menus in restaurants and cafés in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. All 787 cafes and restaurants located within the East Metropolitan Health Service area were contacted and 33% had a separate Kids’ Menu. The validated Kids’ Menu Healthy Score (KIMEHS) was used to assess the nutritional quality of the Kids’ Menus. Almost all Kids’ Menus (99%) were rated ‘unhealthy’ using KIMEHS. The mean KIMEHS score for all restaurants and cafés was −8.5 (range −14.5 to +3.5) which was lower (i.e., more unhealthy) than the mean KIMEHS score for the top 10 most frequented chain fast-food outlets (mean −3.5, range −6.5 to +3). The findings highlight the need for additional supports to make improvements in the nutritional quality of Kids’ Menus. Local Government Public Health Plans provide an opportunity for policy interventions, using locally relevant tools to guide decision making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Nutrition)
51 pages, 1945 KB  
Article
Strategies to Improve School Meal Consumption: A Systematic Review
by Juliana F. W. Cohen, Amelie A. Hecht, Erin R. Hager, Lindsey Turner, Kara Burkholder and Marlene B. Schwartz
Nutrients 2021, 13(10), 3520; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103520 - 7 Oct 2021
Cited by 75 | Viewed by 18499
Abstract
School meals can play an integral role in improving children’s diets and addressing health disparities. Initiatives and policies to increase consumption have the potential to ensure students benefit from the healthy school foods available. This systematic review evaluates studies examining initiatives, interventions, and [...] Read more.
School meals can play an integral role in improving children’s diets and addressing health disparities. Initiatives and policies to increase consumption have the potential to ensure students benefit from the healthy school foods available. This systematic review evaluates studies examining initiatives, interventions, and policies to increase school meal consumption. Following PRISMA guidelines, this review was conducted using four databases and resulted in a total of 96 studies. The research evidence supports the following strategies to increase school meal consumption: (1) offering students more menu choices; (2) adapting recipes to improve the palatability and/or cultural appropriateness of foods; (3) providing pre-sliced fruits; (4) rewarding students who try fruits and vegetables; (5) enabling students to have sufficient time to eat with longer (~30 min) lunch periods; (6) having recess before lunch; and (7) limiting students’ access to competitive foods during the school day. Research findings were mixed when examining the impact of nutrition education and/or offering taste tests to students, although multiple benefits for nutrition education outside the cafeteria were documented. There is some evidence that choice architecture (i.e., “Smarter Lunchroom”) techniques increase the proportion of students who select targeted meal components; however, there is not evidence that these techniques alone increase consumption. There were limited studies of the impact of increasing portion sizes; serving vegetables before other meal components; and strengthening local district and/or school wellness policies, suggesting that further research is necessary. Additionally, longer-term studies are needed to understand the impact of policies that limit students’ access to flavored milk. Several studies found increases in students’ meal consumption following the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act (HHFKA) and concerns regarding an increase in food waste following the HHFKA were not supported. Overall, there are a range of effective strategies to increase school meal consumption that can be implemented by schools, districts, and policymakers at the local, state, and federal levels (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021244688). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Nutrition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3566 KB  
Article
KIMEHS—Proposal of an Index for Qualitative Evaluation of Children’s Menus—A Pilot Study
by Ada Rocha and Claudia Viegas
Foods 2020, 9(11), 1618; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9111618 - 6 Nov 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4516
Abstract
Considering the importance of the food environments for health promotion, and the lack of simple, easy to use, low-cost measures of the quality of meals, the authors developed a qualitative menu index (KIMEHS—Kids’ Menu Healthy Score), tailored to children’s menu evaluation. Development of [...] Read more.
Considering the importance of the food environments for health promotion, and the lack of simple, easy to use, low-cost measures of the quality of meals, the authors developed a qualitative menu index (KIMEHS—Kids’ Menu Healthy Score), tailored to children’s menu evaluation. Development of the tool was based on the Mediterranean food pattern. It includes 18 components, divided into seven main groups that reflect key aspects of menu quality, including protein source, side dishes, vegetables, dessert and beverages, and also allergens and nutritional information. The index was analysed for content and construct validity, as well as inter-rater reliability, and was applied to a sample of menus from restaurants in shopping centres in the Lisbon region. Possible index point ranges from −17 to 17, with a higher score indicating greater compliance with the recommendations. A value of 5.5 is obtained if all KIMEHS items are available, considering healthy and non-healthy options. The inter-rater reliability was assessed and values above 0.80 were obtained for Alpha Cronbach, as well as agreement % rate >75%. Agreement percentage is above 75% for all the components. Evaluated restaurants scored from −14 to 7, with an average KIMEHS of −6.15. Only four restaurants scored positive values, ranging from 0.25 to 7. KIMEHS was considered to be an adequate index to evaluate children’s menus, from the menu information displayed on restaurant websites and/or on restaurant displays or table menus. It is a simple, low-cost tool that may be used as a reference for health professionals as an objective measure to evaluate the food environment. Stakeholders could also be involved in their own assessment to help educate consumers about healthy food choices, strengthening the efforts to promote an adequate food pattern and health, contributing to the fight against obesity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Food Quality and Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 303 KB  
Article
Voluntary Kids’ Meal Beverage Standards: Are They Sufficient to Ensure Healthier Restaurant Practices and Consumer Choices?
by Phoebe Harpainter, Sridharshi C. Hewawitharana, Danielle L. Lee, Anna C. Martin, Wendi Gosliner, Lorrene D. Ritchie and Gail Woodward-Lopez
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(15), 5275; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155275 - 22 Jul 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3956
Abstract
Many quick-service restaurants (QSRs) instituted voluntary kids’ meal default beverage standards (standards) between 2013 to 2017. Little is known about impacts of standards on QSR drive-through practices and on customer choices. This study assessed differences in restaurant practices including kids’ meal beverages shown [...] Read more.
Many quick-service restaurants (QSRs) instituted voluntary kids’ meal default beverage standards (standards) between 2013 to 2017. Little is known about impacts of standards on QSR drive-through practices and on customer choices. This study assessed differences in restaurant practices including kids’ meal beverages shown on menu boards, offered by cashiers, and selected by customers in QSRs with and without voluntary standards. Observations (n = 111) and customer surveys (n = 84) were conducted in 2018 at QSRs with standards (n = 70) and without (n = 41) in low-income California, U.S. neighborhoods. Kids’ meal beverages on menu boards (n = 149) and offered by cashiers (n = 185) at QSRs with and without standards were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression. Significantly more menu boards at QSRs with standards (n = 103) vs. without (n = 46) featured only milk, water or unsweetened juice (65.1% vs. 4.4%; p < 0.001). Most cashiers at QSRs with standards and QSRs without (53.1%, 62.5%) asked what drink the data collector wanted rather than first offering default beverages. A small sample of customer interviews found that customers at QSRs with standards most commonly ordered juice (37.0%); at QSRs without standards, soda (45.5%). Although menu boards showed healthier kids’ meal beverages at QSRs with standards than without, cashier behavior was inconsistent. Results suggest additional measures (legislation, implementation support, enforcement) may be needed to ensure optimal implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physical Activity and Health Behaviors in Children and Adolescents)
10 pages, 671 KB  
Article
Nutritional Quality of Fast Food Kids Meals and Their Contribution to the Diets of School-Aged Children
by Ana Gabriela Palos Lucio, Diana Nicte-Há Sansores Martínez, Corina Olvera Miranda, Laura Quezada Méndez and Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo
Nutrients 2020, 12(3), 612; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030612 - 26 Feb 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 8657
Abstract
International data indicate that children and adolescents obtain around one third of their daily food intake from products consumed outside their home. Food products from restaurants are usually higher in calories and lower in nutritional value than those prepared home. We evaluated the [...] Read more.
International data indicate that children and adolescents obtain around one third of their daily food intake from products consumed outside their home. Food products from restaurants are usually higher in calories and lower in nutritional value than those prepared home. We evaluated the nutritional quality in kids’ meals from three fast food chains and two movie theaters and compared them with nutritional recommendations for Mexican school-age population. Results showed that the menu options marketed for school-age children have higher caloric contributions than those recommended, in addition to a deficient nutritional quality. The contribution of caloric and of almost all macronutrients for all mealtimes is not only high but even above 100% or 200% of the mean recommended daily intake (reaching to more than 400% of the recommendations of carbohydrates and lipids of preschool age group). In particular, the snack main dish (popcorn), provides over 100% of the mean energy intake recommendations for the three school age groups and for preschool age group, this contribution could reach to 270%. Therefore, regulations regarding nutritional recommendations should exist for these types of commercialized food products for school-age children, along with mandatory and clear labeling that allows consumers to be able to make better choices for their kids. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Public Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2943 KB  
Article
A Cluster Randomized Trial to Promote Healthy Menu Items for Children: The Kids’ Choice Restaurant Program
by Guadalupe X. Ayala, Iana A. Castro, Julie L. Pickrel, Shih-Fan Lin, Christine B. Williams, Hala Madanat, Hee-Jin Jun and Michelle Zive
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(12), 1494; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121494 - 1 Dec 2017
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 7364
Abstract
Evidence indicates that restaurant-based interventions have the potential to promote healthier purchasing and improve the nutrients consumed. This study adds to this body of research by reporting the results of a trial focused on promoting the sale of healthy child menu items in [...] Read more.
Evidence indicates that restaurant-based interventions have the potential to promote healthier purchasing and improve the nutrients consumed. This study adds to this body of research by reporting the results of a trial focused on promoting the sale of healthy child menu items in independently owned restaurants. Eight pair-matched restaurants that met the eligibility criteria were randomized to a menu-only versus a menu-plus intervention condition. Both of the conditions implemented new healthy child menu items and received support for implementation for eight weeks. The menu-plus condition also conducted a marketing campaign involving employee trainings and promotional materials. Process evaluation data captured intervention implementation. Sales of new and existing child menu items were tracked for 16 weeks. Results indicated that the interventions were implemented with moderate to high fidelity depending on the component. Sales of new healthy child menu items occurred immediately, but decreased during the post-intervention period in both conditions. Sales of existing child menu items demonstrated a time by condition effect with restaurants in the menu-plus condition observing significant decreases and menu-only restaurants observing significant increases in sales of existing child menu items. Additional efforts are needed to inform sustainable methods for improving access to healthy foods and beverages in restaurants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Environment, Diet, and Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop