Search Results (23)

Dysphagia is a commonly encountered condition in clinical practice, with a rising incidence reported particularly in South Korea. It can be broadly classified into oropharyngeal dysphagia and esophageal dysphagia, and distinguishing between the two is crucial for establishing rehabilitation treatment strategies. Oropharyngeal dysphagia frequently occurs in central nervous system diseases such as stroke, dementia, and Parkinson’s disease and has a significant impact on prognosis. Additionally, because there is a high risk of life-threatening aspiration pneumonia in patients complaining of dysphagia, an accurate diagnosis must be made during the early stages of the condition. Patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia may report difficulty initiating swallowing and may experience coughing, choking, nasopharyngeal reflux, aspiration, and a sensation of leftover food in the pharynx during swallowing. Patients with esophageal dysphagia may report a sensation of food getting stuck in the esophagus for a few seconds after the initiation of swallowing. Esophageal dysphagia should be characterized by analyzing whether the foods causing dysphagia are solid, liquid, or both, as well as by the progression of symptoms, whether they are progressive or intermittent; their severity; and associated symptoms such as weight loss, heartburn, or regurgitation. Video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) are invaluable in determining the causes, severity, and treatment strategies for dysphagia. Since swallowing disorders are significant factors influencing the course and prognosis regardless of the type of disease, clinicians should adopt a systematic approach to such disorders. Full article

Late radiation-associated dysphagia (late-RAD) remains a challenge in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship, despite advancements in treatment methods. Although Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) stands as the preferred diagnostic approach for oropharyngeal dysphagia assessment in the HNC population, current studies lack a FEES-derived swallowing parameter characterization and phenotypic classification within this specific cohort. This study sought to employ FEES-based assessment to characterize swallowing safety and efficacy profiles, identify distinct phenotypes in HNC patients suffering from late-RAD, and examine potential correlations between safety and efficacy parameters. A retrospective analysis included twenty-four post-radiotherapy HNC patients evaluated using standardized FEES protocols across three bolus consistencies (liquid, semisolid, and solid). Swallowing safety was quantified using the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS), while efficacy was measured via the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS). Additionally, six distinct dysphagia phenotypes were characterized within the cohort. Propulsion deficit was the predominant phenotype (92%), followed by delayed pharyngeal phase (37.5%) and protective deficit (25%), with 46% of patients exhibiting multiple phenotypes. Unsafe swallowing occurred most frequently with liquid consistency (62.5%), while residue was most prevalent with semisolid (82.6% valleculae, 52.2% pyriform sinuses) and solid consistencies (92.3% valleculae, 53.8% pyriform sinuses). Significant correlations were found between penetration–aspiration and pharyngeal residue scores across consistencies (p < 0.05). FEES examination revealed distinct phenotypes in late radiation-associated dysphagia, with a predominance of propulsion deficit and significant interdependence between safety and efficacy parameters. Full article

Background/Objectives: Dysphagia, a prevalent condition among older adults, poses significant health risks if not accurately assessed and managed. Instrumental assessments (IAs) like videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) allow detailed examinations of swallowing physiology but are underutilized in long-term care settings due to logistical challenges. This study aims to explore the current practice patterns, stakeholder perspectives, and barriers to and facilitators of IA implementation in these settings. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, analyzing the literature from databases including CINAHL Complete, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS. A total of 1339 articles were identified. After the removal of 332 duplications, 1007 articles were screened, with four meeting the inclusion criteria for describing IA implementation or stakeholder perspectives in community-based long-term care settings for older adults. Results: This review identified significant underutilization of IA in long-term care settings, primarily due to logistical barriers and transportation issues. Stakeholders, particularly speech–language pathologists (SLPs), acknowledged the benefits of IA in improving dysphagia management but encountered challenges in accessing these assessments. Mobile FEES (mFEES) emerged as a promising solution, offering on-site assessments that could enhance the accuracy and timeliness of dysphagia care. Conclusions: While IA is crucial for effective dysphagia management in older adults, its implementation in long-term care settings is hindered by various barriers. mFEES presents a viable solution to improve IA accessibility and representativeness. Further research is warranted to develop context-specific implementation strategies and to explore the perspectives of all stakeholders involved in dysphagia care. Full article

Background/Objectives: Oral intake and secretions need to be assessed separately, especially in patients with tracheal tubes, as they are vital for dysphagia treatment and may require different management strategies. This study aims to validate the Italian version of the Munich Swallowing Score (IT-MUCSS) by examining its content and construct validity in relation to the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and oral intake in adults with neurogenic dysphagia, as well as assessing intra- and inter-rater reliability. This tool is clinically and scientifically useful as it includes two subscales: IT-MUCSS-Saliva, which assesses saliva/secretion management and the presence of a tracheal tube, and IT-MUCSS-Alimentazione, which evaluates feeding methods. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, a total of 50 dysphagic patients with a neurological diagnosis were recruited from a neuro-rehabilitation hospital and underwent both clinical and instrumental assessments. The main outcome measures included evaluating food and liquid intake using the Italian versions of the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS-It) and the IT-MUCSS. Pharyngeal residues were assessed using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (IT-YPRSRS), and airway penetration/aspiration were evaluated using the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS) during FEES. Results: The IT-MUCSS demonstrated excellent reproducibility (K = 0.91) and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.72). Strong correlations were found between IT-MUCSS and the FOIS-It scale, indicating the effective assessment of dysphagia. Test–retest reliability was high (ICC = 0.96 for total score). Construct validity was confirmed through significant correlations with instrumental measures during FEES. Conclusions: The IT-MUCSS is a valid tool for assessing functional oral intake and the management of saliva/secretions, specifically in relation to the level of saliva/secretions management compared to FEES measures of swallowing safety and efficiency in patients with neurogenic dysphagia. Full article

Background and Objectives: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common swallowing disorder, characterized by difficulties in moving food and liquids from the mouth to the esophagus; it is particularly prevalent among older adults with neurological conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a short-term complex treatment protocol combining dietary modifications, swallowing exercises, and transcutaneous neuromuscular electrostimulation in reducing the oropharyngeal dysphagia severity and aspiration risk among geriatric patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 64 participants aged 60 and older, with oropharyngeal dysphagia, at LSMU Kaunas Hospital between May 2021 and April 2023, were included in the study after excluding those with significant comorbidities. Diagnostic assessments included the water swallow test and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, conducted before and after treatment. Results: The results indicated a statistically significant reduction in the severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia, with 18.8% of patients showing improvements from moderate to mild dysphagia and 33.3% from severe to moderate. Additionally, the median PAS score was four points (IQR 3–6) before treatment and significantly decreased to three points (IQR 2–4) after treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings suggest that even a short-term multidisciplinary approach that lasts 10 days can effectively alleviate the symptoms of oropharyngeal dysphagia, enhance patient safety, and improve swallowing among geriatric patients suffering from this condition. Full article

This report describes the case of a 62-year-old male patient in Saudi Arabia who developed a diverticular pouch in his oral cavity. Diverticula are rare conditions that appear as protrusions or pouches within the digestive tract’s inner lining. The condition can occur in different parts of the digestive system, but the colon is the most affected part. As part of the patient’s symptoms, he presented with dysphagia, weight loss, and globus sensations. Multiple diagnostic tests, including ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), did not identify the diverticula. Barium and upper gastrointestinal studies were the diagnostic tests that provided accurate diagnoses where several diverticula were discovered during the videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Surgical intervention was recommended by the multidisciplinary team; however, the patient rejected this treatment option. This report highlights the necessity for instrumental swallowing diagnostic evaluation in the workup of the infrequent etiologies of dysphagia and suggests a gap in the current knowledge, prompting further studies on the etiology, incidence, and optimum management of upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract diverticular disease. Full article

Background and Objectives: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is defined as a swallowing disorder in which it becomes difficult to form a bolus and move food from the mouth to the proximal part of the esophagus. Several factors can cause this disorder in geriatric patients. With oropharyngeal dysphagia, the patient’s social isolation and the risk of depression increase, while the quality of life deteriorates. Materials and Methods: In this study, oropharyngeal dysphagia was suspected based on the EAT-10 questionnaire and diagnosed with the water drink test and endoscopic swallowing evaluation, which assesses the aspiration risk by using an eight-point Penetration–Aspiration scale. Patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia received complex treatment: exercises to strengthen the swallowing muscles, electrostimulation of the swallowing muscles, and a modified diet. The quality of life of 64 patients was assessed by using the DHI, SWAL-QoL, and EAT-10 questionnaires before complex treatment and after treatment. The results show that the quality of life improved after the complex treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Results: The mean age of patients was 77.8 (9.1) years, and 56.3% of patients were women. At baseline, mild oropharyngeal dysphagia was found in 18.8% of patients; moderate—in 51.6%; and severe—in 29.7%. Aspiration risk was low in 28.1% of patients; medium—in 39.1%; and high—in 32.8%. The severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration risk significantly decreased after treatment (p = 0.002). The EAT-10 score mean was 15.23 (8.92) points before treatment and decreased to 11.50 (6.12) points after treatment (p < 0.001). Before treatment, the DHI physical score was 15.75 (6.813), the DHI functional score was 14.56 (8.659), and the DHI emotional score was 11.06 (7.848) (p < 0.001), and after complex treatment, the DHI physical score was 14.56 (8.659), the DHI functional score was 9.74 (7.165), and the DHI emotional score was 7.94 (6.588) (p < 0.001). The total SWAL-QoL score mean was 132.71 (34.392) points before treatment and increased to 152.42 (30.547) points after treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Complex treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia plays an important role in improving the quality of life and reducing aspiration risk in older people affected by this condition. Full article

Patients with neurodegenerative disorders (NDDs) often experience functional dysphagia, which may involve dysfunction in a specific phase of swallowing or in the entire process. This review outlines the approach to dysphagia in the setting of NDDs. Distinguishing the etiology of dysphagia can be difficult, and it is important to always look out for signs pointing to NDD as the cause. Thorough diagnostic work-up is essential, and it includes a comprehensive history and physical examination, alongside swallowing function tests, such as fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, videofluoroscopic swallowing study, and high-resolution manometry. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach with a treatment plan tailored to each patient. This involves dietary guidance, swallowing rehabilitation, and surgery in cases in which improvement with rehabilitation is inadequate. Surgery may involve altering certain pharyngolaryngeal structures to facilitate swallowing and reduce the risk of aspiration (swallowing improvement surgery) or separating the airway and digestive tract while sacrificing laryngeal function, with the main goal of preventing aspiration (aspiration prevention surgery). Proper management stems from recognizing the impact of these disorders on swallowing and consistently finding ways to improve the quality of life of patients. Full article

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is linked to significant morbidity, adversely affecting survival and functional capacity. Post-treatment challenges such as pain, dysphonia, and dysphagia are common, prompting increased attention in survivorship research. Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires, especially the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), are prevalent outcome measures in clinical studies but often lack parallel objective swallowing function evaluations, leading to potential outcome discrepancies. This study aimed to illuminate the relationship between subjective QoL (EQ-5D-5L and MDADI) measures and objective swallowing function (evaluated via Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, FEES) in patients with HNSCC. The analysis revealed a notable discordance between objective measures of swallowing function, such as the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS) and residue ratings in the vallecula or piriform sinus, and patients’ subjective QoL assessments (p = 0.21). Despite the lack of correlation, swallowing-related QoL, as measured by the MDADI, was more indicative of disease severity than generic QoL assessments. Generic QoL scores did not demonstrate substantial variation between patients. In contrast, MDADI scores significantly declined with advancing tumor stage, multimodal therapy, and reliance on feeding tubes. However, the clinical significance of this finding was tempered by the less than 10-point difference in MDADI scores. The findings of this study underline the limitations of QoL measures as standalone assessments in patients with HNSCC, given their reliance on patient-perceived impairment. While subjective QoL is a crucial aspect of evaluating therapeutic success and patient-centric outcomes, it may fail to capture critical clinical details such as silent aspirations. Consequently, QoL assessments should be augmented by objective evaluations of swallowing function in clinical research and practice to ensure a holistic understanding of patient well-being and treatment impact. Full article

Dysphagia is a syndrome of abnormal eating function resulting from a variety of causative diseases, and is associated with malnutrition. To date, the swallowing function has been difficult to examine without the use of invasive and expensive methods, such as the videofluorographic swallowing study or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. In recent years, progress has been made in the clinical application of ultrasound equipment for the evaluation of body compositions near the body surface, including the assessment of nutritional status. Ultrasound examination is a noninvasive procedure and relatively inexpensive, and the equipment required is highly portable thanks to innovations such as wireless probes and tablet monitoring devices. The process of using ultrasound to visualize the geniohyoid muscle, digastric muscle, mylohyoid muscle, hyoid bone, tongue, masseter muscle, genioglossus muscle, orbicularis oris muscle, temporalis muscle, pharynx, esophagus, and larynx, and the methods used for evaluating these structures, are provided in this study in detail. This study also aims to propose a protocol for the assessment of swallowing-related muscles that can be applied in real-world clinical practice for the diagnosis of sarcopenic dysphagia, which can occur in elderly patients with sarcopenia, and has received much attention in recent years. Full article

The aim of this study is to describe a measured return to instrumental dysphagia assessments for our vulnerable surgical patient population, such that best practice patterns could be resumed and our staff kept safe from transmission of COVID-19. A retrospective medical record review provided data on clinical practice patterns of swallowing assessment in an at-risk surgical patient population. Outcomes of this study support protocols that allow clinicians to safely resume the use of instrumental assessment and return to best practice in dysphagia assessment for our surgical patient population. Full article

Visuoperceptual evaluation of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is a commonly used assessment in dysphagia or swallowing disorders. Currently, no international consensus exists regarding which visuoperceptual measures to use for the analysis of FEES recordings. Moreover, existing visuoperceptual FEES measures are limited by poor and incomplete psychometric data, identifying an urgent need for developing a visuoperceptual measure to interpret FEES recordings. Following the COSMIN group’s (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) psychometric taxonomy and guidelines, this study aimed to establish the content validity of a new visuoperceptual FEES (V-FEES) measure in adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Using the Delphi technique, international consensus was achieved among dysphagia experts across 21 countries, resulting in a new prototype measure for V-FEES, comprising 30 items, 8 function testing items (i.e., specific tasks performed by patients while observing and rating items), and 36 unique operationalisations (i.e., defining items into measurable factors that could be measured empirically using visuoperceptual observation). This study supports good content validity for V-FEES, including participants’ feedback on the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the included items. Future studies will continue the instrument development process and determine the remaining psychometric properties using both the classic test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT) models. Full article

(1) Background: Diagnosis of dysphagia in critically ill patients with a tracheostomy is important to avoid aspiration pneumonia. The objective of this study was to analyze the validity of the modified blue-dye test (MBDT) on the diagnosis of dysphagia in these patients; (2) Methods: Comparative diagnostic test accuracy study. Tracheostomized patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) were studied with two tests for dysphagia diagnosis: MBDT and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) as the reference standard. Comparing the results of both methods, all diagnostic measures were calculated, including the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC); (3) Results: 41 patients, 30 males and 11 females, mean age 61 ± 13.9 years. The prevalence of dysphagia was 70.7% (29 patients) using FEES as the reference test. Using MBDT, 24 patients were diagnosed with dysphagia (80.7%). The sensitivity and specificity of the MBDT were 0.79 (CI95%: 0.60–0.92) and 0.91 (CI95%: 0.61–0.99), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 0.95 (CI95%: 0.77–0.99) and 0.64 (CI95%: 0.46–0.79). AUC was 0.85 (CI95%: 0.72–0.98); (4) Conclusions: MBDT should be considered for the diagnosis of dysphagia in critically ill tracheostomized patients. Caution should be taken when using it as a screening test, but its use could avoid the need for an invasive procedure. Full article

Background: Dysphagia poses a huge health issue in our ageing population, impacting patients psychologically and through risk of aspiration, malnutrition and airway obstruction. The use of carbonated liquids to provide sensory enhancement as a tool to stimulate neuromuscular activity in dysphagia rehabilitation remains an area with limited research. This article reviews current evidence. Method: A data search of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Cochrane was undertaken with set search terms. Abstracts were reviewed and selected by two clinicians according to inclusion criteria and papers were assessed using PRISMA methodology. Results: Selected publications (1992–2022) involved a median of 23 participants with predominantly neurogenic dysphagia. Despite the differences in study designs all used videofluroscopy (VF) to assess outcome measures except Morishita et al. who used fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallow (FEES). The studies were small scale but showed encouraging results. However, there was heterogeneity between results of specific outcome measures. One study surveyed taste which was overall positively received. Conclusions: There continues to remain limited evidence to direct the use of carbonated liquids in rehabilitation of dysphagia, however its role shows some promise. The heterogeneity of not just study designs but also study participants seems to be a primary barrier. Whilst evidence is encouraging, further prospective studies standardising patient cohorts, methodologies and quantitative outcome measures must be carried out. Longitudinal studies to look at the role of carbonated liquids in secretion management is another area of potential interest. In conclusion the use of carbonated liquid in dysphagia rehabilitation may have a potential role but without firm evidence-based research, successful use in clinical practice cannot be implemented. Full article

The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS) provides an image-based assessment of pharyngeal residue in the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Its performance was investigated only in FEES frames. This study analyzed the reliability and construct validity of the YPRSRS in FEES videos and the influence of bolus consistency. Thirty pairs of FEES videos and frames, 8 thin liquids (<50 mPa·s), 11 pureed (2583.3 mPa·s at 50 s⁻¹, 697.87 mPa·s at 300 s⁻¹), and 11 solid food; were assessed by 29 clinicians using the YPRSRS; 14 raters re-assessed materials at least 15 days from the first evaluation. Construct validity and intra-rater reliability were assessed using weighted Cohen’s Kappa. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using weighted Fleiss Kappa. Construct validity and inter-rater reliability were almost perfect or excellent for frames (0.82 ≤ k ≤ 0.89) and substantial or intermediate to good for videos (0.67 ≤ k ≤ 0.79). Intra-rater reliability was almost perfect for both frames and videos (k ≥ 0.84). Concerning bolus consistency, thin liquids had significantly lower values of construct validity, intra-, and inter-rater reliability than pureed and solid food. Construct validity and inter-rater reliability were significantly lower for solid food than for pureed food. The YPRSRS showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity also in FEES videos. Reliability was significantly influenced by bolus consistency. Full article