Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (9)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Descemetorhexis

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 234 KB  
Review
Topical Losartan in Ophthalmology: Rationale, Experimental and Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Clinical Applications
by Barbara Burgos-Blasco, Mercedes Molero-Senosiain, Pilar Perez-Garcia, Mayte Ariño-Gutierrez, Pedro Arriola-Villalobos and David Diaz-Valle
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(4), 1354; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041354 - 9 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1485
Abstract
Corneal fibrosis remains a major cause of visual morbidity, with transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling playing a central role in this process. Losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker widely used systemically for cardiovascular indications, has recently attracted interest in ophthalmology due [...] Read more.
Corneal fibrosis remains a major cause of visual morbidity, with transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling playing a central role in this process. Losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker widely used systemically for cardiovascular indications, has recently attracted interest in ophthalmology due to its antifibrotic properties through indirect inhibition of TGF-β signaling. In recent years, increasing experimental and early clinical evidence has suggested that topical ophthalmic formulations of losartan may attenuate corneal fibrosis following diverse injuries such as descemetorhexis, alkali burns, and photorefractive keratectomy-related injury. Topical losartan represents a promising, non-cytotoxic antifibrotic strategy in ophthalmology, although human evidence is limited and further randomized controlled clinical trials are required to define its clinical efficacy, optimal indications, timing, posology, formulations, and long-term safety. This review summarizes the biological rationale for the use of topical losartan in ophthalmology, including its molecular mechanisms of action, pharmacologic considerations, and safety profile. We critically review preclinical studies in corneal models, as well as emerging clinical applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
14 pages, 995 KB  
Review
Emerging Innovations in the Treatment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Narrative Review
by Magdalena Niestrata, James Jackson, Shehnaz Bazeer, Mingya Alexa Gong and Zahra Ashena
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(4), 238; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13040238 - 22 Oct 2025
Viewed by 3359
Abstract
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading cause of endothelial failure requiring keratoplasty in industrialised nations. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has become the gold-standard surgical therapy, yet it is constrained by limited donor tissue and a steep learning curve. This narrative [...] Read more.
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading cause of endothelial failure requiring keratoplasty in industrialised nations. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has become the gold-standard surgical therapy, yet it is constrained by limited donor tissue and a steep learning curve. This narrative review summarises current and emerging therapeutic strategies for FECD. We describe conventional endothelial keratoplasty and its outcomes, tissue-sparing procedures such as descemetorhexis without endothelial keratoplasty (DWEK) and quarter-DMEK, regenerative approaches including cultured endothelial cell injection and synthetic corneal substitutes, and adjunctive innovations ranging from Rho-associated kinase inhibitors to artificial intelligence-assisted diagnostics. Challenges surrounding donor shortages, variable clinical outcomes, regulatory hurdles and cost are critically appraised. We conclude by outlining future directions that are likely to combine advanced surgical techniques with cell-based and biomaterial solutions to deliver accessible, long-term restoration of vision for patients with FECD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 408 KB  
Article
Comparative Analysis of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Versus Descemetorhexis Without Keratoplasty (DSO) in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy
by Vanesa Díaz-Mesa, Álvaro Sánchez-Ventosa, Timoteo González-Cruces, Alberto Membrillo, Marta Villalba-González, Alberto Villarrubia and Antonio Cano-Ortiz
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4857; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144857 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1784
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This retrospective observational study evaluates the efficacy of Descemetorhexis without Keratoplasty (DSO) compared to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in the management of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD). The outcomes were compared in terms of the corneal anatomical changes, visual results, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This retrospective observational study evaluates the efficacy of Descemetorhexis without Keratoplasty (DSO) compared to Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) in the management of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy (FECD). The outcomes were compared in terms of the corneal anatomical changes, visual results, and complication rates between the two surgical techniques for FECD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, observational study including 31 eyes from 26 patients who underwent either DSO (n = 16) or DMEK (n = 15) at the Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Arruzafa. Patients were included if they had complete follow-up data at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year post-intervention. Their clinical information was collected from medical records and complementary tests, including the Snellen visual acuity test, Pentacam corneal tomography, and specular microscopy. Results: The average time to achieve best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was significantly longer for DSO (7.44 ± 2.3 months) than for DMEK (5.73 ± 1.9 months, p = 0.004). Complication rates were higher in the DMEK group (26.7%), and in comparison, there was an absence of complications in the DSO group (p = 0.043). Corneal endothelial cell migration was confirmed in patients who underwent DSO, with a mean cell density of 817.17 ± 91.7 cells/mm2 after one year. Conclusions: DSO effectively treated the selected patients with FECD who presented central guttata and corneal edema, achieving visual outcomes equivalent to those of DMEK while reducing complication rates. This technique eliminates the need for donor tissue and immunosuppressive medications, making it a viable alternative for specific cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 197 KB  
Article
Descemet Stripping Only for Symptomatic Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy—A Retrospective Case Series Comparing ROCK-I vs. Hypertonic Sodium Chloride for Post-Surgical Adjuvant Therapy
by Eyal Cohen, Nizar Din, Sultan Aldrees, Michael Mimouni, Tanya Trinh, Nir Sorkin, Larissa Gouvea, Clara C. Chan and Allan R. Slomovic
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1512; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051512 - 24 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1414
Abstract
Purpose: To report our experience with Descemet stripping only (DSO) for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Methods: Thirteen eyes of 9 patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent a 4 mm central Descemetorhexis without graft implantation between June 2017 and [...] Read more.
Purpose: To report our experience with Descemet stripping only (DSO) for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Methods: Thirteen eyes of 9 patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent a 4 mm central Descemetorhexis without graft implantation between June 2017 and July 2020. All patients had central confluent guttata, undetectable central endothelial cell count by specular microscopy, and healthy peripheral corneal endothelium. In 6 eyes, the procedure was combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Eight eyes were treated with topical rho-associated protein kinase (Rock) inhibitors and five eyes were treated with hypertonic sodium chloride 5%, post operatively. Results: All eyes completed at least 4 months of post-operative follow-up (mean follow-up 12.0 ± 7.9 mo; 4–29 mo). Mean patient age was 70 ± 6 years. All eyes achieved corneal clearance with an average time for clearance of 7.2 ± 2.4 weeks. Mean endothelial cell count postoperatively was 778 ± 228. Mean central corneal thicknesses pre- and postoperatively were 620 ± 100 and 560 ± 58 μm, respectively. Eleven eyes achieved improvement in visual acuity and in two eyes vision remained unchanged, with mean visual acuity 0.392 to 0.225 logMAR; p = 0.001. Also, all patients reported subjective improvement in the quality of vision. ROCK inhibitors compared to hypertonic sodium chloride 5% did not show statistically significant differences in time for corneal clearance or endothelial cell counts postoperatively but did show a trend towards faster corneal clearance and higher endothelial cell counts postoperatively among the ROCK inhibitors-treated eyes. Conclusions: In patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and visual degradation secondary to central guttata, DSO represents a viable procedure for visual rehabilitation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Ophthalmic Surgery)
13 pages, 890 KB  
Review
ROCK Inhibitors in Corneal Diseases and Glaucoma—A Comprehensive Review of These Emerging Drugs
by Luca Pagano, Jason William Lee, Matteo Posarelli, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Stephen Kaye and Alfredo Borgia
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(21), 6736; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12216736 - 25 Oct 2023
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 5744
Abstract
Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors have gained significant attention as emerging novel treatment options in the field of ophthalmology in recent years. The evidence supporting their efficacy in glaucoma and corneal pathology includes both in vitro and clinical studies. Among the available options, ripasudil [...] Read more.
Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitors have gained significant attention as emerging novel treatment options in the field of ophthalmology in recent years. The evidence supporting their efficacy in glaucoma and corneal pathology includes both in vitro and clinical studies. Among the available options, ripasudil and netarsudil have emerged as the leading ROCK inhibitors, and some countries have approved these therapeutic options as treatments for glaucoma. Various dosing regimens have been studied, including monotherapy and combination therapy, especially for patients with secondary glaucoma who are already on multiple medications. Another rising application of ROCK inhibitors includes their use as an adjunct in surgical procedures such as Descemetorhexis Without Endothelial Keratoplasty (DWEK), Descemet Stripping Only (DSO) to accelerate visual recovery, glaucoma surgeries to reduce scarring process and allow better intraocular pressure (IOP) control, or after complicated anterior segment surgery to treat corneal oedema. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the existing literature in the field, offering recommendations for prescribing ROCK inhibitors and also discussing patient selection, drug efficacy, and possible adverse effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Optic Nerve Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2762 KB  
Review
Intraoperative OCT for Lamellar Corneal Surgery: A User Guide
by Antonio Moramarco, Natalie di Geronimo, Matteo Airaldi, Lorenzo Gardini, Francesco Semeraro, Danilo Iannetta, Vito Romano and Luigi Fontana
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(9), 3048; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12093048 - 22 Apr 2023
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3305
Abstract
Intraoperative OCT is an innovative and promising technology which allows anterior and posterior segment ocular surgeons to obtain a near-histologic cross-sectional and tomographic image of the tissues. Intraoperative OCT has several applications in ocular surgery which are particularly interesting in the context of [...] Read more.
Intraoperative OCT is an innovative and promising technology which allows anterior and posterior segment ocular surgeons to obtain a near-histologic cross-sectional and tomographic image of the tissues. Intraoperative OCT has several applications in ocular surgery which are particularly interesting in the context of corneal transplantation. Indeed, iOCT images provide a direct and meticulous visualization of the anatomy, which could guide surgical decisions. In particular, during both big-bubble and manual DALK, the visualization of the relationship between the corneal layers and instruments allows the surgeon to obtain a more desirable depth of the trephination, thus achieving more type 1 bubbles, better regularity of the plane, and a reduced risk of DM perforation. During EK procedures, iOCT supplies information about proper descemetorhexis, graft orientation, and interface quality in order to optimize the postoperative adhesion and reduce the need for re-bubbling. Finally, mushroom PK, a challenging technique for many surgeons, can be aided through the use of iOCT since it guides the correct apposition of the lamellae and their centration. The technology of iOCT is still evolving: a larger field of view could allow for the visualization of all surgical fields, and automated tracking and iOCT autofocusing guarantee the continued centration of the image. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging in Ophthalmology—Volume I)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 873 KB  
Article
3D Visualization System in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK): A Six-Month Comparison with Conventional Microscope
by Alberto Morelli, Rosangela Ferrandina, Eleonora Favuzza, Michela Cennamo and Rita Mencucci
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4312; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154312 - 25 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2191
Abstract
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery using the three-dimensional (3D) display system NGENUITY to DMEK surgery performed with the traditional microscope (TM) in patients affected by Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Disease (FECD). Methods: Retrospective comparative study [...] Read more.
Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery using the three-dimensional (3D) display system NGENUITY to DMEK surgery performed with the traditional microscope (TM) in patients affected by Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Disease (FECD). Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 40 pseudophakic eyes of 40 patients affected by FECD who underwent DMEK surgery. Twenty patients (3D group) were operated on using the 3D display system and 20 patients (TM group) were operated on using the traditional microscope. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD) and corneal densitometry (CD) values were documented before and at 1, 3 and 6 months after DMEK. Intra- and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: The baseline assessments did not differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). Global surgical time and time to perform descemetorhexis were significantly lower in the TM group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively). BSCVA, CCT, ECD and CD values did not differ significantly in the two groups at all follow-ups (p > 0.05). Complication rate was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Three-dimensional display systems can be securely employed in DMEK surgery considering the satisfactory clinical outcomes, including Scheimpflug CD. Nevertheless, the slightly longer surgical time of the 3D DMEKs may lead to surgeons’ hesitancy. The main advantages of the heads-up approach may be the improved ergonomic comfort during surgery and the utility of assistants in surgical training. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging in Ophthalmology—Volume I)
Show Figures

Figure 1

5 pages, 206 KB  
Article
Impact of TCF4 Repeat Number on Resolution of Corneal Edema after Descemet’s Stripping Only in Fuchs Dystrophy: A Pilot Study
by Natasha Spiteri, Nino Hirnschall, Katherine van Bysterveldt, Alec Lin Hou, Gregory Moloney, Matthew Ball and Andrea L. Vincent
Vision 2021, 5(4), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision5040047 - 9 Oct 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3059
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) genotype, specifically transcription factor 4 (TCF4) CTG triplet repeat “load” predicts time to clearance following Descemet’s Stripping Only (DSO). Methods: This prospective, interventional trial was conducted on consecutive FECD patients undergoing DSO. Genetic [...] Read more.
Purpose: To investigate whether Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) genotype, specifically transcription factor 4 (TCF4) CTG triplet repeat “load” predicts time to clearance following Descemet’s Stripping Only (DSO). Methods: This prospective, interventional trial was conducted on consecutive FECD patients undergoing DSO. Genetic analysis using patients’ saliva was performed to assess the extent of CTG expansion using short tandem repeat analysis, corroborated gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing. Polymerase chain reaction and bidirectional Sanger sequencing was undertaken. Partial least square regression and logistic regression modelling was used to evaluate the predictive power of TCF4 repeats on corneal clearance. Results: Of 11 eyes of 11 patients, 8 showed complete corneal clearance. For these 8 patients, mean TCF4 allele repeat was 24.8 (SD: 23.7, range: 11–63) and 63.4 (SD: 30.3; range: 11–97), respectively. In total, 9/11 (81.8%) had expanded CTG repeats (>40) in one allele. In cases with an allele repeat ≥80, there was a significantly increased risk of corneal non-clearance (odds ratio 18.2, p = 0.009). Conclusion: Whilst it was not possible to predict time to corneal clearance based on CTG repeats, there is a significant correlation between allele repeats and achievement of corneal clearance. Full article
19 pages, 648 KB  
Review
Tissue Engineering of Corneal Endothelium
by Tatsuya Mimura, Seiichi Yokoo and Satoru Yamagami
J. Funct. Biomater. 2012, 3(4), 726-744; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb3040726 - 17 Oct 2012
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 10414
Abstract
Human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) do not replicate after wounding. Therefore, corneal endothelial deficiency can result in irreversible corneal edema. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) allows selective replacement of the diseased corneal endothelium. However, DSAEK requires a donor cornea and the worldwide [...] Read more.
Human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) do not replicate after wounding. Therefore, corneal endothelial deficiency can result in irreversible corneal edema. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) allows selective replacement of the diseased corneal endothelium. However, DSAEK requires a donor cornea and the worldwide shortage of corneas limits its application. This review presents current knowledge on the tissue engineering of corneal endothelium using cultured HCECs. We also provide our recent work on tissue engineering for DSAEK grafts using cultured HCECs. We reconstructed DSAEK grafts by seeding cultured DiI-labelled HCECs on collagen sheets. Then HCEC sheets were transplanted onto the posterior stroma after descemetorhexis in the DSAEK group. Severe stromal edema was detected in the control group, but not in the DSAEK group throughout the observation period. Fluorescein microscopy one month after surgery showed numerous DiI-labelled cells on the posterior corneal surface in the DSAEK group. Frozen sections showed a monolayer of DiI-labelled cells on Descemet’s membrane. These findings indicate that cultured adult HCECs, transplanted with DSAEK surgery, maintain corneal transparency after transplantation and suggest the feasibility of performing DSAEK with HCECs to treat endothelial dysfunction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corneal Scarring: Wound Healing and Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop