Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = Bonus–Malus system

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 2121 KiB  
Article
Evaluating Transition Rules for Enhancing Fairness in Bonus–Malus Systems: An Application to the Saudi Arabian Auto Insurance Market
by Asrar Alyafie, Corina Constantinescu and Jorge Yslas
Risks 2025, 13(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks13010018 - 20 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1149
Abstract
A Bonus–Malus System (BMS) is a ratemaking mechanism used in insurance to adjust premiums based on a policyholder’s claim history, with the goal of segmenting risk profiles more accurately. A BMS typically comprises three key components: the number of BMS levels, the transition [...] Read more.
A Bonus–Malus System (BMS) is a ratemaking mechanism used in insurance to adjust premiums based on a policyholder’s claim history, with the goal of segmenting risk profiles more accurately. A BMS typically comprises three key components: the number of BMS levels, the transition rules dictating the movements of policyholders within the system, and the relativities used to determine premium adjustments. This paper explores the impact of modifications to these three elements on risk classification, assessed through the mean squared error. The model parameters are calibrated with real-world data from the Saudi auto insurance market. We begin the analysis by focusing on transition rules based solely on claim frequency, a framework in which most implemented BMSs work, including the current Saudi BMS. We then consider transition rules that depend on frequency and severity, in which higher penalties are given for large claim sizes. The results show that increasing the number of levels typically improves risk segmentation but requires balancing practical implementation constraints and that the adequate selection of the penalties is critical to enhancing fairness. Moreover, the study reveals that incorporating a severity-based penalty enhances risk differentiation, especially when there is a dependence between the claim frequency and severity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1902 KiB  
Article
Bonus-Malus Premiums Based on Claim Frequency and the Size of Claims
by Adisak Moumeesri and Tippatai Pongsart
Risks 2022, 10(9), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10090181 - 9 Sep 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3872
Abstract
The bonus-malus system (BMS) is one of the most widely used tools in merit-rating automobile insurance, with the primary goal of ensuring that fair premiums are paid by all policyholders. The traditional BMS is dependent only on the claim frequency. Thus, an insured [...] Read more.
The bonus-malus system (BMS) is one of the most widely used tools in merit-rating automobile insurance, with the primary goal of ensuring that fair premiums are paid by all policyholders. The traditional BMS is dependent only on the claim frequency. Thus, an insured person who makes a claim with a small severity is penalized unfairly compared to an individual who makes a large severity claim. This study proposes a model for estimating the bonus-malus premium by employing a limit value (monetary unit) which distinguishes claim size into small and large based on claim frequency and claim severity distributions. This assists in determining the penalties for policyholders with claim sizes falling above and below the limit value. The number of claims is assumed to follow a Poisson distribution, and the total number of claims with a size greater than the limit value is considered a binomial distribution. The underlying risk of each policyholder is assumed to follow a beta Lindley distribution and is referred to as the prior distribution. Each policyholder’s claim size is also assumed to follow a gamma distribution, with the Lindley distribution considered as the prior distribution. Bonus-malus premiums are calculated following the Bayesian method. Practical examples using an actual data set are provided, and the results generated are compared to those produced using the traditional Poisson binomial-exponential beta model. This methodology provides a more equitable mechanism for penalizing policyholders in the portfolio. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 510 KiB  
Article
Multiple Bonus–Malus Scale Models for Insureds of Different Sizes
by Jean-Philippe Boucher
Risks 2022, 10(8), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10080152 - 28 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2368
Abstract
How to consider the a priori risks in experience-rating models has been questioned in the actuarial community for a long time. Classic past-claim-rating models, such as the Buhlmann–Straub credibility model, normalize the past experience of each insured before applying claim penalties. On the [...] Read more.
How to consider the a priori risks in experience-rating models has been questioned in the actuarial community for a long time. Classic past-claim-rating models, such as the Buhlmann–Straub credibility model, normalize the past experience of each insured before applying claim penalties. On the other hand, classic Bonus–Malus Scales (BMS) models generate the same surcharges and the same discounts for all insureds because the transition rules within the class system do not depend on the a priori risk. Despite the quality of prediction of the BMS models, this experience-rating model could appear unfair to many insureds and regulators because it does not recognize the initial risk of the insured. In this paper, we propose the creation of different BMSs for each type of insured using recursive partitioning methods. We apply this approach to real data for the farm insurance product of a major Canadian insurance company with widely varying sizes of insureds. Because the a priori risk can change over time, a study of the possible transitions between different BMS models is also performed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Data Science in Insurance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1254 KiB  
Article
Fuzzy Markovian Bonus-Malus Systems in Non-Life Insurance
by Pablo J. Villacorta, Laura González-Vila Puchades and Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez
Mathematics 2021, 9(4), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040347 - 9 Feb 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2956
Abstract
Markov chains (MCs) are widely used to model a great deal of financial and actuarial problems. Likewise, they are also used in many other fields ranging from economics, management, agricultural sciences, engineering or informatics to medicine. This paper focuses on the use of [...] Read more.
Markov chains (MCs) are widely used to model a great deal of financial and actuarial problems. Likewise, they are also used in many other fields ranging from economics, management, agricultural sciences, engineering or informatics to medicine. This paper focuses on the use of MCs for the design of non-life bonus-malus systems (BMSs). It proposes quantifying the uncertainty of transition probabilities in BMSs by using fuzzy numbers (FNs). To do so, Fuzzy MCs (FMCs) as defined by Buckley and Eslami in 2002 are used, thus giving rise to the concept of Fuzzy BMSs (FBMSs). More concretely, we describe in detail the common BMS where the number of claims follows a Poisson distribution under the hypothesis that its characteristic parameter is not a real but a triangular FN (TFN). Moreover, we reflect on how to fit that parameter by using several fuzzy data analysis tools and discuss the goodness of triangular approximates to fuzzy transition probabilities, the fuzzy stationary state, and the fuzzy mean asymptotic premium. The use of FMCs in a BMS allows obtaining not only point estimates of all these variables, but also a structured set of their possible values whose reliability is given by means of a possibility measure. Although our analysis is circumscribed to non-life insurance, all of its findings can easily be extended to any of the abovementioned fields with slight modifications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fuzzy Sets in Business Management, Finance, and Economics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 459 KiB  
Article
Discrete-Time Risk Models with Claim Correlated Premiums in a Markovian Environment
by Dhiti Osatakul and Xueyuan Wu
Risks 2021, 9(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010026 - 14 Jan 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3418
Abstract
In this paper we consider a discrete-time risk model, which allows the premium to be adjusted according to claims experience. This model is inspired by the well-known bonus-malus system in the non-life insurance industry. Two strategies of adjusting periodic premiums are considered: aggregate [...] Read more.
In this paper we consider a discrete-time risk model, which allows the premium to be adjusted according to claims experience. This model is inspired by the well-known bonus-malus system in the non-life insurance industry. Two strategies of adjusting periodic premiums are considered: aggregate claims or claim frequency. Recursive formulae are derived to compute the finite-time ruin probabilities, and Lundberg-type upper bounds are also derived to evaluate the ultimate-time ruin probabilities. In addition, we extend the risk model by considering an external Markovian environment in which the claims distributions are governed by an external Markov process so that the periodic premium adjustments vary when the external environment state changes. We then study the joint distribution of premium level and environment state at ruin given ruin occurs. Two numerical examples are provided at the end of this paper to illustrate the impact of the initial external environment state, the initial premium level and the initial surplus on the ruin probability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 6412 KiB  
Article
Performance Pay in Hospitals: An Experiment on Bonus–Malus Incentives
by Nadja Kairies-Schwarz and Claudia Souček
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(22), 8320; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228320 - 10 Nov 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3656
Abstract
Recent policy reforms in Germany require the introduction of a performance pay component with bonus–malus incentives in the inpatient care sector. We conduct a controlled online experiment with real hospital physicians from public hospitals and medical students in Germany, in which we investigate [...] Read more.
Recent policy reforms in Germany require the introduction of a performance pay component with bonus–malus incentives in the inpatient care sector. We conduct a controlled online experiment with real hospital physicians from public hospitals and medical students in Germany, in which we investigate the effects of introducing a performance pay component with bonus–malus incentives to a simplified version of the German Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) system using a sequential design with stylized routine cases. In both parts, participants choose between the patient optimal and profit maximizing treatment option for the same eight stylized routine cases. We find that the introduction of bonus–malus incentives only statistically significantly increases hospital physicians’ proportion of patient optimal choices for cases with high monetary baseline DRG incentives to choose the profit maximizing option. Medical students behave qualitatively similar. However, they are statistically significantly less patient oriented than real hospital physicians, and statistically significantly increase their patient optimal decisions with the introduction of bonus–malus incentives in all stylized routine cases. Overall, our results indicate that whether the introduction of a performance pay component with bonus–malus incentives to the (German) DRG system has a positive effect on the quality of care or not particularly depends on the monetary incentives implemented in the DRG system as well as the type of participants and their initial level of patient orientation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Incentive and Market Perspectives in Health Care)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 336 KiB  
Article
An Alternative Pricing System through Bayesian Estimates and Method of Moments in a Bonus-Malus Framework for the Ghanaian Auto Insurance Market
by Azaare Jacob and Zhao Wu
J. Risk Financial Manag. 2020, 13(7), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13070143 - 3 Jul 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3436
Abstract
This paper examines the current No-Claim Discount (NCD) system used in Ghana’s auto insurance market as inefficient and outmoded and, therefore, proposes an alternative optimal Bonus-Malus System (BMS) intended to meet the present market conditions and demand. It appears that the existing BMS [...] Read more.
This paper examines the current No-Claim Discount (NCD) system used in Ghana’s auto insurance market as inefficient and outmoded and, therefore, proposes an alternative optimal Bonus-Malus System (BMS) intended to meet the present market conditions and demand. It appears that the existing BMS fails to acknowledge the frequency and severity of policyholders’ claims in its design. We minimized the auto insurance portfolios’ risk through Bayesian estimation and found that the risk is well fitted by gamma, with the claim distribution modeled by the negative binomial law with the expected number of claims (a priori) as 14%. The models presented in this paper recognize the longevity of accident-free driving and fully reward higher discounts to policyholders from the second year when the true characteristics of the hidden risks posed to the pool have been ascertained. The BMS finally constructed using the net premium principle is very optimal and has reasonable punishment and rewards for both good and bad drivers, which could also be useful in other developing economies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Risk)
11 pages, 319 KiB  
Article
Multivariate Credibility in Bonus-Malus Systems Distinguishing between Different Types of Claims
by Emilio Gómez-Déniz and Enrique Calderín-Ojeda
Risks 2018, 6(2), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6020034 - 11 Apr 2018
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3537
Abstract
In the classical bonus-malus system the premium assigned to each policyholder is based only on the number of claims made without having into account the claims size. Thus, a policyholder who has declared a claim that results in a relatively small loss is [...] Read more.
In the classical bonus-malus system the premium assigned to each policyholder is based only on the number of claims made without having into account the claims size. Thus, a policyholder who has declared a claim that results in a relatively small loss is penalised to the same extent as one who has declared a more expensive claim. Of course, this is seen unfair by many policyholders. In this paper, we study the factors that affect the number of claims in car insurance by using a trivariate discrete distribution. This approach allows us to discern between three types of claims depending wether the claims are above, between or below certain thresholds. Therefore, this model implements the two fundamental random variables in this scenario, the number of claims as well as the amount associated with them. In addition, we introduce a trivariate prior distribution conjugated with this discrete distribution that produce credibility bonus-malus premiums that satisfy appropriate traditional transition rules. A practical example based on real data is shown to examine the differences with respect to the premiums obtained under the traditional system of tarification. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Credibility Theory: New Developments and Applications)
17 pages, 445 KiB  
Article
Optimal Claiming Strategies in Bonus Malus Systems and Implied Markov Chains
by Arthur Charpentier, Arthur David and Romuald Elie
Risks 2017, 5(4), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks5040058 - 8 Nov 2017
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4598
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the impact of the accident reporting strategy of drivers, within a Bonus-Malus system. We exhibit the induced modification of the corresponding class level transition matrix and derive the optimal reporting strategy for rational drivers. The hunger for bonuses [...] Read more.
In this paper, we investigate the impact of the accident reporting strategy of drivers, within a Bonus-Malus system. We exhibit the induced modification of the corresponding class level transition matrix and derive the optimal reporting strategy for rational drivers. The hunger for bonuses induces optimal thresholds under which, drivers do not claim their losses. Mathematical properties of the induced level class process are studied. A convergent numerical algorithm is provided for computing such thresholds and realistic numerical applications are discussed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 460 KiB  
Article
Modeling and Performance of Bonus-Malus Systems: Stationarity versus Age-Correction
by Søren Asmussen
Risks 2014, 2(1), 49-73; https://doi.org/10.3390/risks2010049 - 11 Mar 2014
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 8947
Abstract
In a bonus-malus system in car insurance, the bonus class of a customer is updated from one year to the next as a function of the current class and the number of claims in the year (assumed Poisson). Thus the sequence of classes [...] Read more.
In a bonus-malus system in car insurance, the bonus class of a customer is updated from one year to the next as a function of the current class and the number of claims in the year (assumed Poisson). Thus the sequence of classes of a customer in consecutive years forms a Markov chain, and most of the literature measures performance of the system in terms of the stationary characteristics of this Markov chain. However, the rate of convergence to stationarity may be slow in comparison to the typical sojourn time of a customer in the portfolio. We suggest an age-correction to the stationary distribution and present an extensive numerical study of its effects. An important feature of the modeling is a Bayesian view, where the Poisson rate according to which claims are generated for a customer is the outcome of a random variable specific to the customer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Stochastic Processes in Insurance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop