Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Journal = Current Oncology
Section = Oncology Biomarkers

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 1106 KiB  
Article
Trends in the Utilization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing After the Introduction of a Publicly Funded Genetic Testing Program
by Fahima Dossa, Nancy N. Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Tari Little, Lea Velsher, Jordan Lerner-Ellis, Andrea Eisen and Kelly Metcalfe
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(8), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32080439 - 6 Aug 2025
Viewed by 149
Abstract
Purpose: To effectively reduce cancer burden, genetic testing programs should identify high-risk individuals prior to cancer development, when risk-reduction strategies can be implemented. We evaluated trends in BRCA1/BRCA2 testing use after implementation of a publicly funded testing program. Methods: We conducted [...] Read more.
Purpose: To effectively reduce cancer burden, genetic testing programs should identify high-risk individuals prior to cancer development, when risk-reduction strategies can be implemented. We evaluated trends in BRCA1/BRCA2 testing use after implementation of a publicly funded testing program. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, near population-based study of women who underwent BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in Ontario, Canada, (2007–2016) (n = 15,986). Temporal trends were evaluated using linear and Poisson regression. Results: Although annual utilization of testing increased over time (p < 0.001), mean age at testing increased from 49.9 years (SD 13.8) in 2007 to 53.8 years (SD 13.7) in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of women with a cancer history at testing also increased from 53.5% in 2007 to 66.3% in 2015 (p < 0.001); the proportion of women free from breast cancer did not change significantly (49.2% in 2007 versus 45.1% in 2015, p = 0.90). As a proportion of all tested, those with breast cancer tested within 3 months of diagnosis increased over time (0.39% of tests in 2007 versus 13.6% of tests in 2015; p < 0.001). Conclusions: While the institution of a publicly funded genetic testing program was associated with rising utilization, increasing age at testing and decreasing testing of unaffected women suggest limitations in identifying high-risk individuals eligible for risk-reduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research on Breast Cancer Genes in Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3699 KiB  
Article
PDL1 Gene Gain Predicts an Unfavorable Prognosis in HIV-Positive Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
by Jiamin Chen, Xiaoman Kang, Xinghuan Ding, Yuyang Dai, Lei Sun, Man Li, Ting Liu, Enshan Feng and Xingang Zhou
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(7), 378; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32070378 - 29 Jun 2025
Viewed by 392
Abstract
Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) refers to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) originating in the brain, eyes, spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid without the presence of lymphoma outside of the central nervous system [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 987 KiB  
Article
Canadian Recommendations for Germline Genetic Testing of Patients with Breast Cancer: A Call to Action
by Evan Weber, Carlos A. Carmona-Gonzalez, Melanie Boucher, Andrea Eisen, Kara Laing, Jennifer Melvin, Kasmintan A. Schrader, Sandeep Sehdev, Stephanie M. Wong and Karen A. Gelmon
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 290; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060290 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 1294
Abstract
Pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes are associated with poor clinical outcomes but also offer an opportunity for more individualized therapeutic pathways. Given increasing knowledge, improvements in germline genetic testing efficiency, and the availability of novel systemic targeted treatment options, the importance [...] Read more.
Pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes are associated with poor clinical outcomes but also offer an opportunity for more individualized therapeutic pathways. Given increasing knowledge, improvements in germline genetic testing efficiency, and the availability of novel systemic targeted treatment options, the importance of appropriately identifying patients for testing has never been greater. A pan-Canadian expert working group (EWG) consisting of 10 healthcare professionals (HCPs) was convened to review recent international guidelines for germline genetic testing in breast cancer and develop Canadian recommendations. The group identified four clinical questions to address which patients should undergo testing, what approaches should be used, how patients should be counselled, and what steps are needed for implementation. In response to these questions, the EWG agreed upon 12 recommendations that emphasized broader incorporation of germline genetic testing and more standardized, streamlined testing and counselling approaches. The group also offered multiple suggestions to support effective and equitable implementation across Canada. These recommendations provide guidance for HCPs and represent a call to action for the Canadian government and other organizations to support genetic testing pathways, drug access, and ultimately improved outcomes for patients with breast cancer and their families. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research on Breast Cancer Genes in Cancers)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 1762 KiB  
Article
Treatment Patterns, Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life in BRCA1/2-Associated Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
by Anna-Maria Parger, Paulina Gebhart, Daniela Muhr, Christian F. Singer and Yen Y. Tan
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(5), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32050269 - 2 May 2025
Viewed by 907
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) patients with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) often face unique challenges compared to non-carriers. However, the impact of PVs on treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to assess these [...] Read more.
Background: Breast cancer (BC) patients with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) often face unique challenges compared to non-carriers. However, the impact of PVs on treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and quality of life (QoL) remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to assess these factors in these individuals. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Medical University of Vienna Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer between 2011 and 2021. Among 1285 individuals identified, 338 were included (120 BRCA1 PVs, 47 BRCA2 PVs, and 171 non-carriers). Clinical data including treatment patterns and outcomes were collected; QoL was assessed in BRCA1/2 PV carriers using the SF-12 questionnaire. Results: Among 338 BC patients, BRCA1 PV carriers were significantly younger at disease onset and more likely to present with triple-negative BC, with higher Ki-67 (>10%) than BRCA2 or non-carriers. Platinum-based chemotherapy was more frequently administered to BRCA PV carriers for neoadjuvant treatment (OR 7.7, p < 0.001), and therapeutic bilateral mastectomy was more common in BRCA1 carriers (44.7%) compared to BRCA2 (37.8%, p = 0.114) and non-carriers (25.2%, p = 0.003). Epirubicin was the primary agent for adjuvant chemotherapy across all groups compared to other chemotherapeutic agents. QoL assessments revealed significant physical health challenges, particularly among those who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, while mental health scores remained relatively high. Conclusions: This study highlights the distinct treatment patterns and tumor characteristics associated with BRCA1/2 carriers, including the impact of treatments on quality of life. Nevertheless, our findings ought to be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size. Larger prospective studies with more complete treatment data, including PARP inhibitor use, and further research on supportive care strategies are needed for this high-risk population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research on Breast Cancer Genes in Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop