Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (7)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Ulrich Jaehde

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1307 KiB  
Article
Medication Risks and Their Association with Patient-Reported Outcomes in Inpatients with Cancer
by Maximilian Günther, Markus Schuler, Leopold Hentschel, Hanna Salm, Marie-Therese Schmitz and Ulrich Jaehde
Cancers 2024, 16(11), 2110; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112110 - 31 May 2024
Viewed by 1543
Abstract
Background: We aimed to assess medication risks and determine factors influencing the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer inpatients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) based on medication reviews, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Multiple linear regression analyses [...] Read more.
Background: We aimed to assess medication risks and determine factors influencing the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer inpatients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) based on medication reviews, including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify sociodemographic, disease-related, and drug therapy-related factors influencing changes from hospital admission to discharge in the scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results: A total of 162 inpatients with various hematological and solid cancer diseases was analyzed. Patients received a mean of 11.6 drugs and 92.6% of patients exhibited polymedication resulting in a mean of 4.0 DRPs per patient. Based on PRO data, 21.5% of DRPs were identified. Multiple linear regression models described the variance of the changes in global HRQOL and physical function in a weak-to-moderate way. While drug therapy-related factors had no influence, relapse status and duration of hospital stay were identified as significant covariates for global HRQOL and physical function, respectively. Conclusion: This analysis describes underlying DRPs in a German cancer inpatient population. PROs provided valuable information for performing medication reviews. The multiple linear regression models for global HRQOL and physical function provided explanations for changes during hospital stay. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 13770 KiB  
Article
Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells in Combination with Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitors Functioning via the Fas/FasL Axis Provides Rationale for a Potential Clinical Benefit in Burkitt’s lymphoma
by Fangfang Ge, Yulu Wang, Amit Sharma, Yu Yang, Hongde Liu, Markus Essler, Ulrich Jaehde and Ingo G. H. Schmidt-Wolf
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(15), 12476; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241512476 - 5 Aug 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2292
Abstract
Constant efforts are being made to develop methods for improving cancer immunotherapy, including cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell therapy. Numerous heat shock protein (HSP) 90 inhibitors have been assessed for antitumor efficacy in preclinical and clinical trials, highlighting their individual prospects for targeted cancer [...] Read more.
Constant efforts are being made to develop methods for improving cancer immunotherapy, including cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell therapy. Numerous heat shock protein (HSP) 90 inhibitors have been assessed for antitumor efficacy in preclinical and clinical trials, highlighting their individual prospects for targeted cancer therapy. Therefore, we tested the compatibility of CIK cells with HSP90 inhibitors using Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) cells. Our analysis revealed that CIK cytotoxicity in BL cells was augmented in combination with independent HSP90 inhibitors 17-DMAG (17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin) and ganetespib. Interestingly, CIK cell cytotoxicity did not diminish after blocking with NKG2D (natural killer group 2, member D), which is a prerequisite for their activation. Subsequent analyses revealed that the increased expression of Fas on the surface of BL cells, which induces caspase 3/7-dependent apoptosis, may account for this effect. Thus, we provide evidence that CIK cells, either alone or in combination with HSP90 inhibitors, target BL cells via the Fas–FasL axis rather than the NKG2D pathway. In the context of clinical relevance, we also found that high expression of HSP90 family genes (HSP90AA1, HSP90AB1, and HSP90B1) was significantly associated with the reduced overall survival of BL patients. In addition to HSP90, genes belonging to the Hsp40, Hsp70, and Hsp110 families have also been found to be clinically significant for BL survival. Taken together, the combinatorial therapy of CIK cells with HSP90 inhibitors has the potential to provide clinical benefits to patients with BL. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1778 KiB  
Article
Prioritisation of Adverse Drug Events Leading to Hospital Admission and Occurring during Hospitalisation: A RAND Survey
by Annette Haerdtlein, Anna Maria Boehmer, Katharina Karsten Dafonte, Marietta Rottenkolber, Ulrich Jaehde and Tobias Dreischulte
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4254; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154254 - 22 Jul 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2131
Abstract
(1) Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a common cause of emergency department visits and occur frequently during hospitalisation. Instruments that facilitate the detection of the most relevant ADEs could lead to a more targeted and efficient use of limited resources in research and [...] Read more.
(1) Adverse drug events (ADEs) are a common cause of emergency department visits and occur frequently during hospitalisation. Instruments that facilitate the detection of the most relevant ADEs could lead to a more targeted and efficient use of limited resources in research and practice. (2) We conducted two consensus processes based on the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, in order to prioritise ADEs leading to hospital admission (panel 1) and occurring during hospital stay (panel 2) for inclusion in future ADE measurement instruments. In each panel, the experts were asked to assess the “overall importance” of each ADE on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not important to 4 = very important). ADEs with a median rating of ≥3 without disagreement were defined as “prioritised“. (3) The 13 experts in panel 1 prioritised 38 out of 65 ADEs, while the 12 experts in panel 2 prioritised 34 out of 63 ADEs. The highest rated events were acute kidney injury and hypoglycaemia (both panels), as well as Stevens–Johnson syndrome in panel 1 and rhabdomyolysis in panel 2. (4) The survey led to a set of ADEs for which there was consensus that they were of particular importance as presentations of acute medication-related harm, thereby providing a focus for further medication safety research and clinical practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2066 KiB  
Article
Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis Identifies Variants in DSCAM and PDLIM3 That Correlate with Efficacy Outcomes in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sunitinib
by Meta H. M. Diekstra, Jesse J. Swen, Loes F. M. van der Zanden, Sita H. Vermeulen, Epie Boven, Ron H. J. Mathijssen, Koya Fukunaga, Taisei Mushiroda, Fumiya Hongo, Egbert Oosterwijk, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Daniel Castellano, Achim Fritsch, Jesus Garcia Donas, Cristina Rodriguez-Antona, Rob Ruijtenbeek, Marius T. Radu, Tim Eisen, Kerstin Junker, Max Roessler, Ulrich Jaehde, Tsuneharu Miki, Stefan Böhringer, Michiaki Kubo, Lambertus A. L. M. Kiemeney and Henk-Jan Guchelaaradd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2022, 14(12), 2838; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14122838 - 8 Jun 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2866
Abstract
Individual response to sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients is highly variable. Earlier, sunitinib outcome was related to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP3A5 and ABCB1. Our aim is to provide novel insights into biological mechanisms underlying sunitinib action. We [...] Read more.
Individual response to sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients is highly variable. Earlier, sunitinib outcome was related to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in CYP3A5 and ABCB1. Our aim is to provide novel insights into biological mechanisms underlying sunitinib action. We included mRCC patients from the European EuroTARGET consortium (n = 550) and the RIKEN cohort in Japan (n = 204) which were analysed separately and in a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). SNPs were tested for association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression. Summary statistics were combined using a fixed effect meta-analysis. SNP rs28520013 in PDLIM3 and the correlated SNPs rs2205096 and rs111356738 both in DSCAM, showed genome-wide significance (p < 5 × 10−8) with PFS and OS in the meta-analysis. The variant T-allele of rs28520013 associated with an inferior PFS of 5.1 months compared to 12.5 months in non-carriers (p = 4.02 × 10−10, HR = 7.26). T-allele carriers of rs28520013 showed an inferior OS of 6.9 months versus 30.2 months in non-carriers (p = 1.62 × 10−8, HR = 5.96). In this GWAS we identified novel genetic variants in PDLIM3 and DSCAM that impact PFS and OS in mRCC patients receiving sunitinib. The underlying link between the identified genes and the molecular mechanisms of sunitinib action needs to be elucidated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: From Biology to Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 810 KiB  
Article
Developing a Nationwide Infrastructure for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Oral Anticancer Drugs: The ON-TARGET Study Protocol
by Anna M. Mc Laughlin, Eduard Schmulenson, Olga Teplytska, Sebastian Zimmermann, Patrick Opitz, Stefanie L. Groenland, Alwin D. R. Huitema, Neeltje Steeghs, Lothar Müller, Stefan Fuxius, Gerald Illerhaus, Markus Joerger, Frank Mayer, Uwe Fuhr, Stefan Holdenrieder, Georg Hempel, Oliver Scherf-Clavel, Ulrich Jaehde, Charlotte Kloft and for the ON-TARGET Study Consortium
Cancers 2021, 13(24), 6281; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246281 - 14 Dec 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3967
Abstract
Exposure-efficacy and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been identified for up to 80% of oral anticancer drugs (OADs). Usually, OADs are administered at fixed doses despite their high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability resulting in large differences in drug exposure. Consequently, a substantial proportion of patients receive [...] Read more.
Exposure-efficacy and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been identified for up to 80% of oral anticancer drugs (OADs). Usually, OADs are administered at fixed doses despite their high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability resulting in large differences in drug exposure. Consequently, a substantial proportion of patients receive a suboptimal dose. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), i.e., dosing based on measured drug concentrations, may be used to improve treatment outcomes. The prospective, multicenter, non-interventional ON-TARGET study (DRKS00025325) aims to investigate the potential of routine TDM to reduce adverse drug reactions in renal cell carcinoma patients receiving axitinib or cabozantinib. Furthermore, the feasibility of using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), a minimally invasive and easy to handle blood sampling technique, for sample collection is examined. During routine visits, blood samples are collected and sent to bioanalytical laboratories. Venous and VAMS blood samples are collected in the first study phase to facilitate home-based capillary blood sampling in the second study phase. Within one week, the drug plasma concentrations are measured, interpreted, and reported back to the physician. Patients report their drug intake and toxicity using PRO-CTCAE-based questionnaires in dedicated diaries. Ultimately, the ON-TARGET study aims to develop a nationwide infrastructure for TDM for oral anticancer drugs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutic Monitoring of Anti-cancer Agents)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3466 KiB  
Article
Cisplatin Protein Binding Partners and Their Relevance for Platinum Drug Sensitivity
by Sophie Möltgen, Eleonora Piumatti, Giuseppe M. Massafra, Sabine Metzger, Ulrich Jaehde and Ganna V. Kalayda
Cells 2020, 9(6), 1322; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9061322 - 26 May 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4418
Abstract
Cisplatin is a widely used drug in the treatment of various solid tumors, such as ovarian cancer. However, while the acquired resistance significantly limits the success of therapy, some tumors, such as colorectal cancer, are intrinsically insensitive to cisplatin. Only a small amount [...] Read more.
Cisplatin is a widely used drug in the treatment of various solid tumors, such as ovarian cancer. However, while the acquired resistance significantly limits the success of therapy, some tumors, such as colorectal cancer, are intrinsically insensitive to cisplatin. Only a small amount of intracellular platinum binds to the target—genomic DNA. The fate of the remaining drug is largely obscure. This work aimed to identify the cytosolic protein binding partners of cisplatin in ovarian and colorectal cancer cells and to evaluate their relevance for cell sensitivity to cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Using the fluorescent cisplatin analog BODIPY-cisplatin, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and mass spectrometry, we identified the protein binding partners in A2780 and cisplatin-resistant A2780cis ovarian carcinoma, as well as in HCT-8 and oxaliplatin-resistant HCT-8ox colorectal cell lines. Vimentin, only identified in ovarian cancer cells; growth factor receptor-bound protein 2, only identified in colorectal cancer cells; and glutathione-S-transferase π, identified in all four cell lines, were further investigated. The effect of pharmacological inhibition and siRNA-mediated knockdown on cytotoxicity was studied to assess the relevance of these binding partners. The silencing of glutathione-S-transferase π significantly sensitized intrinsically resistant HCT-8 and HCT-8ox cells to cisplatin, suggesting a possible involvement of the protein in the resistance of colorectal cancer cells to the drug. The inhibition of vimentin with FiVe1 resulted in a significant sensitization of A2780 and A2780cis cells to cisplatin, revealing new possibilities for improving the chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer cells. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 1629 KiB  
Article
Anticancer Dose Adjustment for Patients with Renal and Hepatic Dysfunction: From Scientific Evidence to Clinical Application
by Tomi Hendrayana, André Wilmer, Verena Kurth, Ingo GH Schmidt-Wolf and Ulrich Jaehde
Sci. Pharm. 2017, 85(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/scipharm85010008 - 27 Feb 2017
Cited by 38 | Viewed by 9051
Abstract
Most anticancer agents exhibit a narrow therapeutic index, i.e., a small change in plasma concentrations can lead to a less efficacious treatment or an unacceptable degree of toxicity. This study aimed at providing health professionals with a feasible and time-saving tool to adapt [...] Read more.
Most anticancer agents exhibit a narrow therapeutic index, i.e., a small change in plasma concentrations can lead to a less efficacious treatment or an unacceptable degree of toxicity. This study aimed at providing health professionals with a feasible and time-saving tool to adapt the dose of anticancer agents for patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction. A guideline for anticancer agents was developed based on a literature search. An algorithm was generated to enhance the efficiency of the dose adaptation process. Finally, the dosing guideline was converted into an easy-to-use ExcelTM tool. The concept was applied to a total of 105 adult patients at the Centre for Integrated Oncology, Bonn, Germany. In total, 392 recommendations for dose adaptation were made and 320 (81.6%) recommendations were responded to by the oncologists. 98.4% of the recommendations were accepted. The algorithm simplifies the decision and screening process for high-risk patients. Moreover, it provides the possibility to quickly decide which laboratory tests are required and whether a dose adjustment for a particular anticancer drug is needed. The ExcelTM tool provides a recommended individual dose for patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction. The effectiveness of this strategy to reduce toxicity should be investigated in further studies before being adopted for routine use. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop