Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (11)

Search Parameters:
Authors = Gyorgy Petrovics

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
2 pages, 144 KB  
Retraction
RETRACTED: Sharad et al. Analysis of PMEPA1 Isoforms (a and b) as Selective Inhibitors of Androgen and TGF-β Signaling Reveals Distinct Biological and Prognostic Features in Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1995
by Shashwat Sharad, Zsófia M. Sztupinszki, Yongmei Chen, Claire Kuo, Lakshmi Ravindranath, Zoltan Szallasi, Gyorgy Petrovics, Taduru L. Sreenath, Albert Dobi, Inger L. Rosner, Alagarsamy Srinivasan, Shiv Srivastava, Jennifer Cullen and Hua Li
Cancers 2026, 18(5), 825; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050825 - 4 Mar 2026
Viewed by 577
Abstract
The journal retracts the article titled “Analysis of PMEPA1 Isoforms (a and b) as Selective Inhibitors of Androgen and TGF-β Signaling Reveals Distinct Biological and Prognostic Features in Prostate Cancer” [...] Full article
21 pages, 1542 KB  
Review
Ancestry-Specific DNA Damage Repair Gene Mutations and Prostate Cancer
by Talaibek Borbiev, Kevin Babcock, Kayleigh Sinopole, Gregory T. Chesnut and Gyorgy Petrovics
Cancers 2025, 17(4), 682; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040682 - 18 Feb 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 8974
Abstract
This review is intended to reflect the currently available literature on both clinically significant germline mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes as well as the importance of ancestral diversity in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer (PCa). The second most prevalent cancer worldwide [...] Read more.
This review is intended to reflect the currently available literature on both clinically significant germline mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes as well as the importance of ancestral diversity in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer (PCa). The second most prevalent cancer worldwide in men is PCa, causing significant morbidity and mortality in its advanced stage. Emerging data highlight the substantial role of germline mutations of DDR genes in PCa pathogenesis, especially in progression to aggressive forms of the disease. Germline genetic testing is recognized as a necessary tool for efficient, individualized patient care. NCCR guidelines recommend inquiring about the family history of PCa and known germline variants and, if indicated, proceeding with germline multigene testing followed by post-test genetic counseling. Depending on the germline mutations in HR repair genes or in MMR genes, specific treatment options may provide clinical benefit. We will discuss specific germline mutations that are involved in PCa progression and prognosis in racially diverse populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Urologic Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1129 KB  
Review
A Review of Limbic System-Associated Membrane Protein in Tumorigenesis
by Kayleigh Wittmann Sinopole, Kevin Babcock, Albert Dobi and Gyorgy Petrovics
Biomedicines 2024, 12(11), 2590; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12112590 - 13 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3704
Abstract
Purpose of Review: This review aims to describe the role of limbic system-associated membrane protein (LSAMP) in normal- and pathophysiology, and its potential implications in oncogenesis. We have summarized research articles reporting the role of LSAMP in the development of a variety of [...] Read more.
Purpose of Review: This review aims to describe the role of limbic system-associated membrane protein (LSAMP) in normal- and pathophysiology, and its potential implications in oncogenesis. We have summarized research articles reporting the role of LSAMP in the development of a variety of malignancies, such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma, prostatic adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and epithelial ovarian cancer. We also examine the current understanding of how defects in LSAMP gene function may contribute to oncogenesis. Finally, this review discusses the implications of future LSAMP research and clinical applications. Recent Findings: LSAMP has been originally described as a surface adhesion glycoprotein expressed on cortical and subcortical neuronal somas and dendrites during the development of the limbic system. It is categorized as part of the IgLON immunoglobulin superfamily of cell-adhesion molecules and is involved in regulating neurite outgrowth and neural synapse generation. LSAMP is both aberrantly expressed and implicated in the development of neuropsychiatric disorders due to its role in the formation of specific neuronal connections within the brain. Additionally, LSAMP has been shown to support brain plasticity via the formation of neuronal synapses and is involved in modulating the hypothalamus in anxiogenic environments. In murine studies, the loss of LSAMP expression was associated with decreased sensitivity to amphetamine, increased sensitivity to benzodiazepines, increased hyperactivity in new environments, abnormal social behavior, decreased aggressive behavior, and decreased anxiety. Findings have suggested that LSAMP plays a role in attuning serotonergic activity as well as GABA activity. Given its importance to limbic system development, LSAMP has also been studied in the context of suicide. In malignancies, LSAMP may play a significant role as a putative tumor suppressor, the loss of which leads to more aggressive phenotypes and mortality from metastatic disease. Loss of the LSAMP gene facilitates epithelial-mesenchymal transition, or EMT, where epithelial cells lose adhesion and gain the motile properties associated with mesenchymal cells. Additionally, LSAMP and the function of the RTK pathway have been implicated in tumorigenesis through the modulation of RTK expression in cell membranes and the activation of second messenger pathways and β-catenin. Summary: Beyond its many roles in the limbic system, LSAMP functions as a putative tumor suppressor protein. Loss of the LSAMP gene is thought to facilitate epithelial-mesenchymal transition, or EMT, where cells lose adhesion and migrate to distant organs. LSAMP’s role in modulating RTK activity and downstream ERK and Akt pathways adds to a large body of data investigating RTK expression in oncogenesis. The characteristics of LSAMP defects and their association with aggressive and metastatic disease are evident in reports on clear cell renal cell carcinoma, prostatic adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma, acute myeloid leukemia, and epithelial ovarian cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Second Edition)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 293 KB  
Review
Clinical Biofluid Assays for Prostate Cancer
by Talaibek Borbiev, Indu Kohaar and Gyorgy Petrovics
Cancers 2024, 16(1), 165; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16010165 - 28 Dec 2023
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4523
Abstract
This mini review summarizes the currently available clinical biofluid assays for PCa. The second most prevalent cancer worldwide is PCa. PCa is a heterogeneous disease, with a large percentage of prostate tumors being indolent, and with a relatively slow metastatic potential. However, due [...] Read more.
This mini review summarizes the currently available clinical biofluid assays for PCa. The second most prevalent cancer worldwide is PCa. PCa is a heterogeneous disease, with a large percentage of prostate tumors being indolent, and with a relatively slow metastatic potential. However, due to the high case numbers, the absolute number of PCa-related deaths is still high. In fact, it causes the second highest number of cancer deaths in American men. As a first step for the diagnosis of PCa, the PSA test has been widely used. However, it has low specificity, which results in a high number of false positives leading to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Newer derivatives of the original PSA test, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved 4K (four kallikreins) and the PHI (Prostate Health Index) blood tests, have higher specificities. Tissue-based PCa tests are problematic as biopsies are invasive and have limited accuracy due to prostate tumor heterogeneity. Liquid biopsies offer a minimally or non-invasive choice for the patients, while providing a more representative reflection of the spatial heterogeneity in the prostate. In addition to the abovementioned blood-based tests, urine is a promising source of PCa biomarkers, offering a supplementary avenue for early detection and improved tumor classification. Four urine-based PCa tests are either FDA- or CLIA-approved: PCA3 (PROGENSA), ExoDX Prostate Intelliscore, MiPS, and SelectMDx. We will discuss these urine-based, as well as the blood-based, clinical PCa tests in more detail. We also briefly discuss a few promising biofluid marker candidates (DNA methylation, micro-RNAs) which are not in clinical application. As no single assay is perfect, we envision that a combination of biomarkers, together with imaging, will become the preferred practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Liquid Biopsy of Genitourinary Tumors)
12 pages, 988 KB  
Article
Association of TP53 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Prostate Cancer in a Racially Diverse Cohort of Men
by Allison Duncan, Darryl Nousome, Randy Ricks, Huai-Ching Kuo, Lakshmi Ravindranath, Albert Dobi, Jennifer Cullen, Shiv Srivastava, Gregory T. Chesnut, Gyorgy Petrovics and Indu Kohaar
Biomedicines 2023, 11(5), 1404; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11051404 - 9 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3172
Abstract
Growing evidence indicates the involvement of a genetic component in prostate cancer (CaP) susceptibility and clinical severity. Studies have reported the role of germline mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TP53 as possible risk factors for cancer development. In this single institutional [...] Read more.
Growing evidence indicates the involvement of a genetic component in prostate cancer (CaP) susceptibility and clinical severity. Studies have reported the role of germline mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TP53 as possible risk factors for cancer development. In this single institutional retrospective study, we identified common SNPs in the TP53 gene in AA and CA men and performed association analyses for functional TP53 SNPs with the clinico-pathological features of CaP. The SNP genotyping analysis of the final cohort of 308 men (212 AA; 95 CA) identified 74 SNPs in the TP53 region, with a minor allele frequency (MAF) of at least 1%. Two SNPs were non-synonymous in the exonic region of TP53: rs1800371 (Pro47Ser) and rs1042522 (Arg72Pro). The Pro47Ser variant had an MAF of 0.01 in AA but was not detected in CA. Arg72Pro was the most common SNP, with an MAF of 0.50 (0.41 in AA; 0.68 in CA). Arg72Pro was associated with a shorter time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) (p = 0.046; HR = 1.52). The study demonstrated ancestral differences in the allele frequencies of the TP53 Arg72Pro and Pro47Ser SNPs, providing a valuable framework for evaluating CaP disparities among AA and CA men. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 533 KB  
Review
Biomarkers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Diagnosis
by Brock E. Boehm, Monica E. York, Gyorgy Petrovics, Indu Kohaar and Gregory T. Chesnut
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 2185; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032185 - 22 Jan 2023
Cited by 76 | Viewed by 14510
Abstract
In the United States, prostate cancer (CaP) remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men. CaP is predominantly indolent at diagnosis, with a small fraction (25–30%) representing an aggressive subtype (Gleason score 7–10) that is prone to metastatic progression. This fact, [...] Read more.
In the United States, prostate cancer (CaP) remains the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men. CaP is predominantly indolent at diagnosis, with a small fraction (25–30%) representing an aggressive subtype (Gleason score 7–10) that is prone to metastatic progression. This fact, coupled with the criticism surrounding the role of prostate specific antigen in prostate cancer screening, demonstrates the current need for a biomarker(s) that can identify clinically significant CaP and avoid unnecessary biopsy procedures and psychological implications of being diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Although several diagnostic biomarkers are available to clinicians, very few comparative trials have been performed to assess the clinical effectiveness of these biomarkers. It is of note, however, that a majority of these clinical trials have been over-represented by men of Caucasian origin, despite the fact that African American men have a 1.7 times higher incidence and 2.1 times higher rate of mortality from prostate cancer. Biomarkers for CaP diagnosis based on the tissue of origin include urine-based gene expression assays (PCA3, Select MDx, ExoDx Prostate IntelliScore, Mi-Prostate Score, PCA3-PCGEM1 gene panel), blood-based protein biomarkers (4K, PHI), and tissue-based DNA biomarker (Confirm MDx). Another potential direction that has emerged to aid in the CaP diagnosis include multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI), which in conjunction with clinically validated biomarkers may provide a better approach to predict clinically significant CaP at diagnosis. In this review, we discuss some of the adjunctive biomarker tests along with newer imaging modalities that are currently available to help clinicians decide which patients are at risk of having high-grade CaP on prostate biopsy with the emphasis on clinical utility of the tests across African American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) men. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer and Their Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1661 KB  
Article
Proteomic Tissue-Based Classifier for Early Prediction of Prostate Cancer Progression
by Yuqian Gao, Yi-Ting Wang, Yongmei Chen, Hui Wang, Denise Young, Tujin Shi, Yingjie Song, Athena A. Schepmoes, Claire Kuo, Thomas L. Fillmore, Wei-Jun Qian, Richard D. Smith, Sudhir Srivastava, Jacob Kagan, Albert Dobi, Isabell A. Sesterhenn, Inger L. Rosner, Gyorgy Petrovics, Karin D. Rodland, Shiv Srivastava, Jennifer Cullen and Tao Liuadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2020, 12(5), 1268; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051268 - 17 May 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 5180
Abstract
Although ~40% of screen-detected prostate cancers (PCa) are indolent, advanced-stage PCa is a lethal disease with 5-year survival rates around 29%. Identification of biomarkers for early detection of aggressive disease is a key challenge. Starting with 52 candidate biomarkers, selected from existing PCa [...] Read more.
Although ~40% of screen-detected prostate cancers (PCa) are indolent, advanced-stage PCa is a lethal disease with 5-year survival rates around 29%. Identification of biomarkers for early detection of aggressive disease is a key challenge. Starting with 52 candidate biomarkers, selected from existing PCa genomics datasets and known PCa driver genes, we used targeted mass spectrometry to quantify proteins that significantly differed in primary tumors from PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) across three study outcomes: (i) metastasis ≥1-year post-RP, (ii) biochemical recurrence ≥1-year post-RP, and (iii) no progression after ≥10 years post-RP. Sixteen proteins that differed significantly in an initial set of 105 samples were evaluated in the entire cohort (n = 338). A five-protein classifier which combined FOLH1, KLK3, TGFB1, SPARC, and CAMKK2 with existing clinical and pathological standard of care variables demonstrated significant improvement in predicting distant metastasis, achieving an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (0.86, 0.99, p = 0.001) and a negative predictive value of 92% in the training/testing analysis. This classifier has the potential to stratify patients based on risk of aggressive, metastatic PCa that will require early intervention compared to low risk patients who could be managed through active surveillance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Cancer Biomarkers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 6178 KB  
Article
RETRACTED: Analysis of PMEPA1 Isoforms (a and b) as Selective Inhibitors of Androgen and TGF-β Signaling Reveals Distinct Biological and Prognostic Features in Prostate Cancer
by Shashwat Sharad, Zsófia M. Sztupinszki, Yongmei Chen, Claire Kuo, Lakshmi Ravindranath, Zoltan Szallasi, Gyorgy Petrovics, Taduru L. Sreenath, Albert Dobi, Inger L. Rosner, Alagarsamy Srinivasan, Shiv Srivastava, Jennifer Cullen and Hua Li
Cancers 2019, 11(12), 1995; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11121995 - 12 Dec 2019
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 5268 | Retraction
Abstract
Dysfunctions of androgen/TGF-β signaling play important roles in prostate tumorigenesis. Prostate Transmembrane Protein Androgen Induced 1 (PMEPA1) inhibits androgen and TGF-β signaling via a negative feedback loop. The loss of PMEPA1 confers resistance to androgen signaling inhibitors and promotes bone metastasis. [...] Read more.
Dysfunctions of androgen/TGF-β signaling play important roles in prostate tumorigenesis. Prostate Transmembrane Protein Androgen Induced 1 (PMEPA1) inhibits androgen and TGF-β signaling via a negative feedback loop. The loss of PMEPA1 confers resistance to androgen signaling inhibitors and promotes bone metastasis. Conflicting reports on the expression and biological functions of PMEPA1 in prostate and other cancers propelled us to investigate isoform specific functions in prostate cancer (PCa). One hundred and twenty laser capture micro-dissection matched normal prostate and prostate tumor tissues were analyzed for correlations between quantitative expression of PMEPA1 isoforms and clinical outcomes with Q-RT-PCR, and further validated with a The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) RNA-Seq dataset of 499 PCa. Cell proliferation was assessed with cell counting, plating efficiency and soft agar assay in androgen responsive LNCaP and TGF-β responsive PC3 cells. TGF-β signaling was measured by SMAD dual-luciferase reporter assay. Higher PMEPA1-a mRNA levels indicated biochemical recurrence (p = 0.0183) and lower PMEPA1-b expression associated with metastasis (p = 0.0173). Further, lower PMEPA1-b and a higher ratio of PMEPA1-a vs. -b were correlated to higher Gleason scores and lower progression free survival rate (p < 0.01). TGF-β-responsive PMEPA1-a promoted PCa cell growth, and androgen-responsive PMEPA1-b inhibited cancer cell proliferation. PMEPA1 isoforms -a and -b were shown to be promising candidate biomarkers indicating PCa aggressiveness including earlier biochemical relapse and lower disease specific life expectancy via interrupting androgen/TGF-β signaling. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 627 KB  
Review
A Rich Array of Prostate Cancer Molecular Biomarkers: Opportunities and Challenges
by Indu Kohaar, Gyorgy Petrovics and Shiv Srivastava
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(8), 1813; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081813 - 12 Apr 2019
Cited by 148 | Viewed by 15516
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most prevalent non-skin cancer in men and is the leading cause of cancer-related death. Early detection of prostate cancer is largely determined by a widely used prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test and biopsy is performed for definitive diagnosis. [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer is the most prevalent non-skin cancer in men and is the leading cause of cancer-related death. Early detection of prostate cancer is largely determined by a widely used prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test and biopsy is performed for definitive diagnosis. Prostate cancer is asymptomatic in the early stage of the disease, comprises of diverse clinico-pathologic and progression features, and is characterized by a large subset of the indolent cancer type. Therefore, it is critical to develop an individualized approach for early detection, disease stratification (indolent vs. aggressive), and prediction of treatment response for prostate cancer. There has been remarkable progress in prostate cancer biomarker discovery, largely through advancements in genomic technologies. A rich array of prostate cancer diagnostic and prognostic tests has emerged for serum (4K, phi), urine (Progensa, T2-ERG, ExoDx, SelectMDx), and tumor tissue (ConfirmMDx, Prolaris, Oncoytype DX, Decipher). The development of these assays has created new opportunities for improving prostate cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decisions. While opening exciting opportunities, these developments also pose unique challenges in terms of selecting and incorporating these assays into the continuum of prostate cancer patient care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 2344 KB  
Review
Prostate Cancer Genomics: Recent Advances and the Prevailing Underrepresentation from Racial and Ethnic Minorities
by Shyh-Han Tan, Gyorgy Petrovics and Shiv Srivastava
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(4), 1255; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041255 - 22 Apr 2018
Cited by 62 | Viewed by 13794
Abstract
Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer and the second leading cause of male cancer deaths in the United States. Among African American (AA) men, CaP is the most prevalent malignancy, with disproportionately higher incidence and mortality rates. Even after [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most commonly diagnosed non-cutaneous cancer and the second leading cause of male cancer deaths in the United States. Among African American (AA) men, CaP is the most prevalent malignancy, with disproportionately higher incidence and mortality rates. Even after discounting the influence of socioeconomic factors, the effect of molecular and genetic factors on racial disparity of CaP is evident. Earlier studies on the molecular basis for CaP disparity have focused on the influence of heritable mutations and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Most CaP susceptibility alleles identified based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were common, low-penetrance variants. Germline CaP-associated mutations that are highly penetrant, such as those found in HOXB13 and BRCA2, are usually rare. More recently, genomic studies enabled by Next-Gen Sequencing (NGS) technologies have focused on the identification of somatic mutations that contribute to CaP tumorigenesis. These studies confirmed the high prevalence of ERG gene fusions and PTEN deletions among Caucasian Americans and identified novel somatic alterations in SPOP and FOXA1 genes in early stages of CaP. Individuals with African ancestry and other minorities are often underrepresented in these large-scale genomic studies, which are performed primarily using tumors from men of European ancestry. The insufficient number of specimens from AA men and other minority populations, together with the heterogeneity in the molecular etiology of CaP across populations, challenge the generalizability of findings from these projects. Efforts to close this gap by sequencing larger numbers of tumor specimens from more diverse populations, although still at an early stage, have discovered distinct genomic alterations. These research findings can have a direct impact on the diagnosis of CaP, the stratification of patients for treatment, and can help to address the disparity in incidence and mortality of CaP. This review examines the progress of understanding in CaP genetics and genomics and highlight the need to increase the representation from minority populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Urology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 674 KB  
Review
Genetic and Molecular Differences in Prostate Carcinogenesis between African American and Caucasian American Men
by James Farrell, Gyorgy Petrovics, David G. McLeod and Shiv Srivastava
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(8), 15510-15531; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms140815510 - 25 Jul 2013
Cited by 66 | Viewed by 9431
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death for men in the United States. Prostate cancer incidence and associated mortality are highest in African American men in comparison to other races. The observed differences in [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer is the most common non-skin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death for men in the United States. Prostate cancer incidence and associated mortality are highest in African American men in comparison to other races. The observed differences in incidence and disease aggressiveness at presentation support a potential role for different pathways of prostate carcinogenesis between African American and Caucasian men. This review focuses on some of the recent molecular biology discoveries, which have been investigated in prostate carcinogenesis and their likely contribution to the known discrepancies across race and ethnicity. Key discussion points include the androgen receptor gene structure and function, genome-wide association studies and epigenetics. The new observations of the ethnic differences of the ERG oncogene, the most common prostate cancer gene, are providing new insights into ERG based stratification of prostate cancers in the context of ethnically diverse patient populations. This rapidly advancing knowledge has the likely potential to benefit clinical practice. Current and future work will improve the ability to sub-type prostate cancers by molecular alterations and lead to targeted therapy against this common malignancy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Urology)
Show Figures

Back to TopTop