Next Article in Journal
Cyclodextrins as Modulators of Regulated Cell Death: Implications for Immunometabolism and Therapeutic Innovation
Previous Article in Journal
From Inclusion Complexes to Innovative Therapies: Cyclodextrins and Their Pharmaceutical Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of DNA Aptamers Against Leishmania infantum GP63 Protein for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications

by
Lucía Román-Álamo
1,2,*,
Daniela Currea-Ayala
1,2,3,
Gabriel S. Oliveira
4,5,
Antonino Nicolò Fallica
1,2,
Timen Mooren
6,
Yunuen Avalos-Padilla
1,2 and
Xavier Fernàndez-Busquets
1,2,7,*
1
Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic-Universitat de Barcelona, Parc Científic de Barcelona, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
2
Nanomalaria Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
3
Doctoral School of Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
4
Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
5
Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar (ICBAS/UP), Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
6
Biomedical MRI (BMRI), KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
7
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Institute (IN2UB), University of Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceutics 2026, 18(3), 304; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18030304
Submission received: 24 December 2025 / Revised: 13 February 2026 / Accepted: 25 February 2026 / Published: 28 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Drug Delivery Systems for Leishmaniasis Therapy)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Leishmaniasis is a disease affecting millions of people caused by parasites of the genus Leishmania. The GP63 protein of Leishmania infantum (LiGP63) is one of its major surface antigens and a main virulence factor, playing a role in the adhesion of extracellular promastigote stages to macrophages and in the survival of intracellular amastigotes. Methods: Here, DNA aptamers have been developed against LiGP63 through the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment. Results: Twenty individual aptamer sequences were characterized using confocal fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry analysis, and 14 of them had targeting to more than 70% of L. infantum promastigotes with different subcellular localization patterns. Subsequent dot blot analyses narrowed down the selection to five candidates for further characterization through an aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay where it was possible to detect endogenous LiGP63 in L. infantum promastigote lysates. The five selected aptamers recognized the recombinant LiGP63 protein with binding affinities ranging from 0.3 to 2.1 µM. Promastigotes preincubated with LiGP63Apt-4, -27 and -28 exhibited a significantly reduced adhesion to and infection of RAW 264.7 macrophages. Moreover, when LiGP63Apt-4 and -28 were conjugated to liposomes, these two aptamers significantly enhanced the targeting to L. infantum promastigotes compared to plain liposomes. Conclusions: Given their improved stability and cost-effectiveness over antibodies, the aptamers evolved here represent promising candidates for new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches and for future nanoparticle-based drug delivery strategies in leishmaniasis.

1. Introduction

Over 20 species of Leishmania can infect humans, leading to various clinical manifestations that range from self-healing skin lesions in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) to potentially fatal visceral leishmaniasis (VL), with disease severity depending on the specific parasite species and the host immune response. Despite over 12 million people being infected worldwide, with an annual incidence of 50,000 to 90,000 and 600,000 to 1 million new cases of VL and CL, respectively, leishmaniasis is still considered a neglected tropical disease [1]. The Leishmania life cycle involves two main stages: promastigotes and amastigotes. The flagellated and mobile promastigote resides within the midgut of certain sandfly species and is transmitted to the vertebrate host through a bite. Inside macrophages and other mononuclear phagocytic cells, the parasite transforms into the non-motile amastigote.
The usual diagnosis technique for leishmaniasis is the detection of amastigotes through microscopic examination. For CL this is done in ulcer biopsies, aspirates from the active lesion border, and dermal scrapings, whereas for VL invasive splenic aspirates are required [2]. Leishmania antigen detection in serological tests (ELISA, immunofluorescence, Western blot or agglutination analysis) cannot reliably differentiate active from quiescent infection. These tests have a low sensitivity and encounter difficulties for their application in most endemic areas, and the humoral response in CL is poor [3]. Antigen detection tests applied to non-invasively obtained fluids are easier to use and cost-efficient. For instance, an agglutination test was able to identify a urinary Leishmania carbohydrate antigen [4], and the ELISA detection of antibodies against the rK28 antigen in the urine of a host for VL diagnosis had a sensitivity similar to the same assay done in serum [5]. The leishmanin skin test is based on a T cell inflammatory reaction when the leishmanin antigen is injected intradermally in the forearm of individuals. It has been widely used in epidemiological studies to detect exposure and immunity to Leishmania, and as a complementary diagnostic tool for CL in endemic regions of South America. However, it is no longer used nowadays due to the unavailability of leishmanin obtained under good-practice manufacturing conditions [6]. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for leishmaniasis offer a varying sensitivity and mainly complement clinical identification, since they do not distinguish between active and past infection [3]. An FDA-approved RDT for CL (CL DetectTM Rapid Test) is based on the detection of peroxidoxin, an antigen expressed in both promastigotes and amastigotes, although one study reported that its sensitivity for detecting CL caused by Leishmania donovani was only 36% that of PCR [7]. Regarding the detection of VL, the most widely used RDT is the rK39 test, which detects host antibodies against rK39 antigen, a recombinant fragment of a Leishmania kinesin-related protein. However, its sensitivity varies geographically, being lower in East African populations (approximately 85.3%) compared with about 97% in India [8]. Molecular techniques like PCR are sensitive, but they are not routinely used in the field. To overcome this limitation, a reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay has been developed as a point-of-care diagnostic tool able to detect all Leishmania species in one test using basic equipment [9].
The zinc-metalloprotease GP63, or leishmanolysin, is the most abundant protein on the surface of Leishmania promastigotes [10] and one of its main virulence factors [11]. GP63 associates with the fibronectin receptors present on the surface of the host macrophage and also cleaves complement component 3b (C3b), which binds to complement receptors. These interactions facilitate the adhesion of the parasites to the macrophages and allow for rapid and efficient internalization [12]. Among the multiple functions of GP63 (Figure 1) are its essential role in amastigote survival following internalization [13]. After phagocytosis, Leishmania promastigotes inside the phagosome start modifying it into a parasitophorous vacuole through the participation of pathogenicity factors. One of these is the cysteine proteinase B, whose elimination in Leishmania mexicana was reported to induce a T helper 1 response and limited lesion extension in mice [14]. L. mexicana virulence was shown to be regulated by GP63, since its exogenous expression restored pathogenicity [15]. In all the Leishmania species studied, GP63 has been detected in the amastigote stage [16]. The survival and replication of the parasite in macrophages is facilitated by an inhibition of the release of signaling molecules like TNF, IL-12, IFN-γR and NO [17,18,19,20], which are part of the host response against infection. GP63 triggers a series of signaling modifications that are responsible for this inhibition, such as the activation of protein tyrosine phosphatases in the IRAK-1, MAPK and JAK pathways [18,21,22,23], downregulation of host cell protein synthesis by disrupting mTORC1-dependent signaling [24], inactivation of the transcription factors AP-1 and NF-κB [25,26], or targeting of the nuclear envelope through nucleoporin degradation [27]. In contrast, GP63 cleaves the SNARE protein synaptotagmin XI, a negative regulator of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF and IL-6 [28]. Because these cytokines attract to the parasite inoculation site inflammatory monocytes and neutrophils, GP63 action indirectly contributes to infection establishment and spread [29].
From inside the macrophage, Leishmania modulates the host adaptive immunity. In addition to its suppressive effects in macrophages, GP63 also targets proteins in other cell types [21,31,32,33], e.g., by altering the expression of surface receptors in NK cells, thus blocking their proliferation [31], and by cleaving the surface receptor CD4 [32], required for T lymphocyte activation. Thus, CD4 cleavage by GP63 will contribute to inhibiting the immune response to antigen-presenting cells. In agreement with this, the GP63 cleavage of VAMP8 has been shown in L. donovani and Leishmania major to inhibit, in the context of MHC class I, the cross-presentation of pathogen antigens to CD8+ T lymphocytes, resulting in a reduction in their activation [33]. The above evidence places GP63 as a preferred target for future leishmaniasis control efforts.
Single-stranded oligonucleotide DNA aptamers fold into three-dimensional structures capable of binding target molecules or cells with a high affinity and specificity [34,35,36]. Aptamers offer several advantages over antibodies, including a smaller size for enhanced tissue penetration, better stability at room temperature, non-immunogenicity, and animal-free production, which makes them more cost-effective, scalable, and ethically superior. In addition, aptamers can be easily modified to give them a higher resistance to nucleases, extended circulation times, or the potential for incorporating a range of chemical functionalizations for diagnostic [37] and therapeutic uses [38]. In the context of Leishmania infection, these properties are important to ensure stability, particularly for therapeutic applications where aptamers would be exposed to biological fluids and macrophage-rich environments. Although diagnostic applications allow a higher experimental flexibility, nuclease activity will remain a relevant factor to take into account. Several aptamers targeting Leishmania proteins have been reported for diagnostic applications. Aptamers binding the Leishmania infantum kinetoplastid membrane protein 11 (LiKMP-11) [39], involved in parasite mobility, were incorporated into an aptasensor able to detect 2.27 µM LiKMP-11 [40]. The L. infantum histones H2A (LiH2A) and H3 (LiH3) were used to develop specific aptamers against them, which showed a KD in the nM range [41], although the limits of detection (7500 parasites for LiH2A [42] and 6000 for LiH3 [43]) were too high for diagnostic needs. Aptamers selected against L. major promastigotes were employed to assemble a fluorescent enzyme-linked aptamer-magnetic bead sandwich assay, which offered a rapid and sensitive detection of promastigote protein extracts in sandfly homogenates [44]. Aptamers developed against the L. infantum poly (A)-binding protein, which plays a crucial role in translation, disrupted its interaction with poly(A) tails, representing one of the few examples of the therapeutic potential of aptamers for parasitic diseases [45].
Despite the importance of GP63 in leishmaniasis pathophysiology, no aptamers targeting this protein have been described so far. In this work, DNA aptamers against L. infantum GP63 (LiGP63) have been generated and evaluated for their potential application in diagnostic and prophylactic approaches. Because GP63 is highly conserved among Leishmania species, targeting LiGP63 provides a biologically relevant basis for developing pan-antileishmanial strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Except where otherwise indicated, reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA), and reactions were performed at room temperature (22 to 24 °C).

2.2. Protein Expression and Purification

The region encoding the mature form of L. infantum GP63-2 (LiGP63m, LINF_100010200), spanning residues Val97 to Asn574 of the full-length protein, was PCR-amplified from genomic DNA extracted from a L. infantum culture with the DNeasy® Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands), according to the manufacturer′s protocol. The selected primers (forward: 5′GAAGGTCGTGGGATCGTCGTGCGCGCCGCGAACTGG3′, reverse: 5′GGCCGCTCGAGTCGAGTTGCCGCCGTCCTTGGC3′) allowed the seamless cloning of the gene into the BamHI and SalI sites of the pGEX-5X-1 plasmid using the InFusion cloning system (Clontech, Kusatsu, Japan), following the manufacturer’s instructions. For glutathione-S-transferase (GST) purification, the empty pGEX-5X-1 plasmid was used. After confirming through Sanger sequencing the insertion of the LiGP63m gene (1433 bp), Escherichia coli C41 competent cells were transformed with either pGEX-5X-1 or pGEX-5X-1/LiGP63m constructs. The protein expression of GST and GST-LiGP63m was induced by adding 0.1 mM isopropyl β-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG) to a transformed C41 E. coli culture during the logarithmic growth phase. Following this, the culture was incubated for 16 h at 20 °C in Terrific Broth medium (TB: 24 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L tryptone, 4 mL/L glycerol, 10% potassium phosphate (0.17 M monobasic, 0.72 M dibasic), 1% glucose) supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL ampicillin. To prepare the cell lysate, bacteria were subjected to sonication in lysis buffer 1 (300 mM NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 mM PEFABLOC SC (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), 2 mg/mL lysozyme, 50 mM tris-HCl, pH 8.0) and centrifuged at 16,000× g for 90 min at 4 °C to separate insoluble from soluble fractions. In the case of GST-LiGP63m, as it remained in the insoluble fraction, the protein was extracted from inclusion bodies using two rounds of solubilization buffer. First, the cell pellet was suspended in buffer 1 (2 M urea, 500 mM NaCl, 2% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM tris-HCl, pH 8.0), sonicated (8 min, 30 s on, 30 s off, amplification 80%, 4 °C) with a Sonics Materials VCX-130PB Ultrasonic Processor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and centrifuged as above. The new resulting pellet was then resuspended in buffer 2 (4 M urea, 500 mM NaCl, 2% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM tris-HCl, pH 8.0), sonicated and centrifuged again with the same settings as before. The solubilized protein fraction was dialyzed using Pur-A-LyzerTM Mega Dialysis Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) against decreasing concentrations of urea to allow refolding of the protein. GST and refolded GST-LiGP63m were then purified through affinity chromatography using Glutathione Sepharose® 4B beads (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 500 µL of a 50% washed bead slurry was incubated overnight at 4 °C under gentle stirring with each of the proteins. After this time, beads carrying GST and GST-LiGP63m were washed and aliquoted (at, respectively, 2 × 105 and 1 × 105 beads/vial, which bound ca. 21 and 15 µg of protein), and frozen at −20 °C until their use. To confirm the presence and integrity of GST and GST-LiGP63m, 10 µL of protein-carrying beads was incubated for 5 min at 95 °C diluted in Laemmli solution (0.14 M sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 3 mM bromophenol blue, 0.125 M tris-HCl, pH 6.8) and resolved in a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; Mini Protean II System, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) stained with Coomassie blue.
To obtain larger protein amounts for binding affinity characterization, and to have LiGP63m with a tag different from GST in order to confirm aptamer specificity, the gene encoding LiGP63m was cloned into the pColdTM TF DNA plasmid (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Japan), using the InFusion cloning system, to obtain a 6× histidine-tagged protein (forward and reverse primers used were 5′TACCCTCGAGGGATCCGTCGTGCGCGCCGCGAACTGG3′ and 5′TAGACTGCAGGTCGACGTTGCCGCCGTCCTTGGC3′, respectively). After confirming the insertion of the gene through Sanger sequencing, E. coli C43 competent cells were transformed with the pColdTF-LiGP63m construct, and the expression of the protein (His-TF-LiGP63m) was induced through the addition of 1 mM IPTG to bacteria cultured in TB medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/mL ampicillin, followed by incubation for 24 h at 15 °C. Cells were lysed through sonication in lysis buffer 2 (500 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 1 mM PEFABLOC SC, 2 mg/mL lysozyme, 20 µg/mL DNAse I, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4) and centrifuged (16,000× g, 1 h, 4 °C) to separate the insoluble from the soluble fraction. The His-tagged protein was subsequently purified from the soluble fraction using a HisTrap HP His tag protein purification column (Cytiva) connected to an ÄKTA pureTM chromatography system (Cytiva). The purified protein was eluted with increasing concentrations of imidazole (up to 500 mM), and positive fractions were buffer exchanged with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS), using PD-10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA), and concentrated with an Amicon® Ultra-4, NMWL 10 kDa (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Protein aliquots were quantified as described above and maintained at −20 °C until use. The successful expression and purification of the His-TF-LiGP63m was corroborated in an SDS-PAGE analysis performed as detailed above.

2.3. Generation of DNA Aptamers Against LiGP63m

DNA aptamers against recombinant LiGP63m were obtained using the systematic evolution of ligands through the exponential enrichment (SELEX) method [46,47], starting from an ssDNA random library pool (DNA Technology A/S, Denmark). Each ssDNA sequence in the pool was 76 bases long (ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT), of which the central 40 were randomized, and the two 18-base ends were complementary to the forward and reverse primers used for PCR amplification, which were tagged at their 5’ ends with 6-FAM and dual biotin, respectively. In the first cycle, 10 nmol of DNA library in 1 mL of binding buffer (PBS containing 1 mg/mL of bovine serum albumin (BSA)) was mixed and heated to 95 °C for 5 min and then cooled in ice for 10 min to allow ssDNA folding. The oligonucleotides were then incubated with 2 × 105 GST-Sepharose beads for 1 h under stirring at room temperature (counter selection). Non-binding sequences were then incubated with 2 × 105 GST-LiGP63m-beads in the same conditions. In this case, the non-binding ssDNAs present in the supernatant after a centrifugation (500× g, 5 min) were removed. The resulting bead pellet was taken up in 300 µL of binding buffer and incubated at 95 °C for 10 min to release the bound oligonucleotides, which were separated from the beads through centrifugation as above. To regenerate a sufficient amount of ssDNA for the next SELEX cycle, PCR amplification was performed after each selection using the 2× PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The amplified DNA was precipitated through the addition of 0.1 vol of 3 M sodium acetate and 2.5 vol of cold absolute ethanol. After thoroughly mixing, the tubes were stored at −20 °C for at least 30 min and centrifuged (20,100× g, 40 min, 4 °C). The resulting pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, centrifuged as before, and the solvent was evaporated with a SpeedVac concentrator (SPD 1010, Thermo Scientific Savant) for 35 min. The dsDNA was taken up in PBS and quantified in a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the forward single strand was purified in Micro Bio-Spin chromatography columns (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) loaded with High Capacity NeutrAvidinTM Agarose (Thermo Fisher Scientific), which bound the dual-biotin tag in the reverse chain. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, fluorescein-ssDNA was eluted with 500 µL of 0.1 M NaOH. To neutralize the base, 50 µL of 1 M HCl was added to each elution. The resulting ssDNA was precipitated as above, taken up in 200 µL of binding buffer, and incubated again with 2 × 105 GST-LiGP63m-beads to start the next round of selection. The amount of GST-LiGP63m-beads used from cycle 1 to 3 was 2 × 105, whereas from cycle 4 onwards, a concentration of 1 × 105 beads was used to increase the stringency of the selection. Seven SELEX cycles were performed, and a counter-selection with 1 × 105 protein-free GST-Sepharose beads was done every three cycles to remove unspecific binding sequences.

2.4. Selection of Individual Aptamer Sequences

The ssDNA in the oligonucleotide pool obtained after 7 SELEX cycles was PCR-amplified with unlabelled forward and reverse primers using a high-fidelity Pfu DNA polymerase (BioTools, South San Francisco, CA, USA). The resulting dsDNA was cloned into the pJET1.2/blunt plasmid according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and transformed into competent E. coli DH5α cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific), which were seeded in Luria Broth (LB) containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin agar plates and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Thirty colonies were selected for plasmid extraction and purification using the GeneJET mini-prep kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The inserts were sequenced using GENEWIZ (Azenta Life Sciences, Burlington, MA, USA), and the resulting aptamer sequences were analyzed with the QGRS Mapper 2 software (https://bioinformatics.ramapo.edu/QGRS/index.php, accessed on 23 February 2024) to predict the presence of G-quadruplexes.

2.5. G-Quadruplex Detection by Thioflavin-T

The experimental procedure reported by Li et al. [48] was followed with minor modifications. Aptamer samples were diluted to a final concentration of 1 µM in a 10 mM tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 100 mM KCl. Aptamer folding was promoted by heating the samples at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by slow cooling to room temperature over 2 h. The resulting mixtures were gently resuspended by pipetting and aliquoted in triplicate into a 96-well black plate (Greiner Bio-One, Madrid, Spain) to a final volume of 100 µL/well to which a freshly prepared solution of thioflavin T (ThT) was added to a final concentration of 1 µM. The plate was gently shaken for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, and ThT fluorescence was measured using a Tecan Infinite® M Plex microplate reader, with an excitation wavelength of 450 nm and emission collected between 480 and 800 nm. The obtained fluorescence values were corrected subtracting the signal of a ThT blank prepared in the same buffer used for the aptamer-containing samples. Data are reported as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.

2.6. Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy and Flow Cytometry Analysis

L. infantum promastigotes of the MHOM/ES/2016/CATB101 strain were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min and subsequently washed three times with PBS. Then, 2 × 107 promastigotes were incubated overnight in binding buffer at 4 °C with previously folded 1 µM individual aptamers or 0.2 µM aptamer pools from cycles 2 and 7. To allow a correct pre-folding, aptamers had been incubated in binding buffer as follows: 10 min at 90 °C, 15 min at 5 °C, 8 min at 37 °C, and finally left at 4 °C until use. Promastigotes were then washed with PBS, and nuclei were counterstained for 30 min with 4 µg/µL Hoechst 33342 and rinsed with PBS. For confocal fluorescence analysis, samples were placed in 8-well chamber slides (ibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany) and observed in a Zeiss LSM 800 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with a 100×/1.4 oil DIC M27 objective. Hoechst 33342 and fluorescein were excited with 405 nm and 488 nm diode lasers, and emission was collected in the 390–460 and 500–700 nm ranges, respectively. Manders’ overlap coefficient [49] was calculated by analyzing images with the Coloc 2 plugin in Fiji (version 1.54p) [50]. This coefficient varies from 0 to 1, where 0 corresponds to no overlap between the two signals and 1 represents complete overlap, reflecting the proportion of pixels shared by both channels. For flow cytometry analysis, samples were diluted 1:25 with PBS, and targeting was analyzed in a five-laser LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) in the 20-parameter standard configuration. A total of 50,000 events were recorded, and the promastigote population was selected on a forward-side scattering dot plot. The lasers used to excite Hoechst 33342 and 6-FAM were, respectively, 350 and 488 nm, and the corresponding emissions were collected with 450/50 and 525/50 nm bandpass filters. An unspecific 6-FAM-labeled aptamer (Apt700, [34]) and parasites stained only with Hoechst 33342 were used as negative controls.

2.7. Dot Blots and Western Blots

L. infantum cultures of the MHOM/ES/2016/CATB101 strain containing 1.5 × 107 promastigotes/mL in the stationary phase were pelleted through centrifugation (600× g, 3 min) and washed three times in PBS supplemented with 1× cOmpleteTM protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Promastigote suspensions were diluted 1:100 in 4% PFA and counted in a Neubauer chamber. To obtain a whole parasite lysate, promastigotes were frozen at −80 °C for 24 h and then thawed. In parallel, 200 µL of 1% Triton X-100 in PBS supplemented with 1× cOmpleteTM was added to a different promastigote pellet and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. Then, the samples were centrifuged (20,000× g, 30 min, 4 °C) and the supernatant was recovered (Triton X-100 extract). The resulting pellet was further washed two times with PBS supplemented with 1× cOmpleteTM and suspended in 300 µL of radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 2 mM EDTA, 5% glycerol, 50 mM tris-HCl, pH 9.4) supplemented with 1× cOmpleteTM. After 15 min of incubation at 4 °C, the sample was centrifuged (20,000× g, 5 min, 4 °C), and the resulting supernatant constituted the RIPA extract. The protein concentration of all the samples was determined with the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For dot blots, 1.25 or 2.4 µg of protein sample in 2.5 or 5 µL of PBS was deposited onto an Amersham Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare), and dots were air-dried. The membrane was then blocked overnight with tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween® 20 (TBSt) supplemented with 3% w/v skim milk, washed with TBSt, and incubated with 600 nM 6-FAM-labeled pre-folded aptamers (in TBSt supplemented with 3% w/v skim milk) for 1 h at room temperature, with gentle stirring. Control membranes were probed with monoclonal mouse anti-His tag (Ref. MAB050, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA; 1:2500 dilution in TBSt), monoclonal mouse anti-tubulin (Ref. T9026, Sigma-Aldrich; 1:1000 dilution in TBSt containing 3% w/v skim milk), and polyclonal goat anti-GST (Ref. GE27-4577-01, Sigma-Aldrich; 1:10,000 dilution in TBSt containing 3% w/v skim milk) antibodies for 1 h at 37 °C. After this time, membranes were washed 3× with TBSt, incubated for 1 h at room temperature with anti-mouse or anti-goat horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich Refs. 12-349 and A8919, respectively; both at a1:10,000 dilution in TBSt), and developed with the ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare). The fluorescence of 6-FAM-labeled aptamers and the peroxidase chemiluminescent signal were detected with an ImageQuantTM LAS 4000 image reader (GE Healthcare), using the SYBR green fluorescence filter and the chemiluminescent method, respectively. When required, the density of the dots was quantified using ImageJ software (version 1.54p) [50]. Data were normalized by subtracting the signal from Apt700, used as a negative control, and using as reference the intensity obtained with the antibody anti-His tag, which was established as 100% of signal.
For Western blot analysis, 1 and 5 μg of the purified recombinant GST-LiGP63m and His-TF-LiGP63m proteins, respectively, were resolved in a 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and blocked with 5% w/v skim milk dissolved in TBS containing 0.5% Tween® 20. Membranes were probed with either anti-GST or anti-His tag, as for dot blot assays.

2.8. Determination of Apparent KD and Apparent Bmax

Amounts of 50 µg/mL of purified His-TF-LiGP63m and GST, in PBS volumes of 4 and 1 mL, respectively, were combined with aldehyde/sulfate latex beads, 4 µm, 4% w/v (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a concentration of 0.052% (v/v). Following an overnight incubation at 4 °C with gentle stirring, beads were pelleted (three PBS washes, 3000× g, 15 min, 4 °C) and taken up with fresh PBS in the original volumes. Subsequently, 50 µL of His-TF-LiGP63m-beads (containing 50 µg/mL protein) was mixed with 50 µL of 6-FAM-labeled pre-folded aptamers at seven different concentrations in the range from 2000 to 62.5 nM and incubated overnight at 4 °C under gentle stirring. After one PBS wash, cells were diluted 1:5 in PBS immediately before analysis in a five-laser LSRFortessa flow cytometer, as described above for fluorescein. Control aldehyde/sulfate latex beads carrying GST were incubated only with the two highest aptamer concentrations, and Apt700 served as an additional negative control. Mean fluorescence intensity was determined using FACSDiva Version 6.1.3 software (BD Biosciences). The apparent maximum number of protein binding sites (Bmax), the apparent aptamer concentration that binds to half the receptor sites at equilibrium (KD), and the ratio between them (binding potential) were obtained by fitting the intensity of specific binding to the aptamer concentration using the equation Y = Bmax X/(KD + X). GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to generate the saturation curve, with non-linear regression fit for binding analysis, selecting a one-site binding equation.

2.9. Binding Affinity Assays

The aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay (ALISA, [51]) was used to determine the limit of detection of the aptamers for the recombinant His-TF-LiGP63m and for LiGP63 in whole parasite lysates. His-TF-LiGP63m and GST were diluted at 3.6 µg/100 µL in carbonate–bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6), and seven 1:2 serial dilutions were deposited for overnight immobilization at 4 °C in 96-well immunoassay plates with transparent flat bottoms (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The volume added per well was 50 µL, and therefore the highest amount of protein in the assay was 1.8 µg. Then, samples were washed three times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween® 20 (PBSt) and subsequently blocked for 1 h at 37 °C with 100 µL/well of PBS containing 3% BSA. In parallel, 6-FAM-labeled aptamers (15 µM) were pre-folded as described above, diluted in PBSt to a concentration of 600 nM, and 50 µL/well was added after removing the blocking solution. Following an overnight incubation at 4 °C and two washes with PBSt, the fluorescence emission of 6-FAM was collected at 530 nm using an excitation wavelength of 488 nm (Infinite Nano+ multimode microplate reader; Tecan Trading AG, Männedorf, Switzerland). Binding affinity to whole parasite lysates was done as for His-TF-LiGP63m except for the incubation time with the aptamers (1 h at room temperature), the number of PBSt washes (3) before fluorescence reading, and the amount of total protein/well (0.11 µg to 3.5 ng, corresponding to ca. 30,000 and 938 L. infantum promastigotes, respectively).

2.10. Effect of Aptamers on L. infantum Adhesion to and Infection of Macrophages

RAW 264.7 macrophages were seeded in an 8-well chamber slide (ibidi GmbH) at 105 cells/mL in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin in a final volume of 300 µL per well, and left to adhere overnight. Meanwhile, aptamers LiGP63Apt-4 and -28 and Apt700 were folded as previously described, and 1 µM of each was incubated with 106 promastigotes/mL in a final volume of 300 µL of DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. After 1 h of incubation, promastigotes were centrifuged (680× g, 3 min, 2×), and the final pellet was taken up in DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin and added to the adhered RAW 264.7. After an overnight incubation, cells were washed with PBS five times to remove extracellular parasites. Four µg/mL of Hoechst 33342 and 5 µg/mL of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA)-Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added and incubated for 10 min; then, the cells were washed twice with PBS, followed by fixation with 4% PFA for 15 min and three last washes to remove PFA. Samples were visualized in a Leica TCS SP5 laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Hoechst 33342 and WGA-Alexa Fluor 647 were detected through excitation using 405 and 532 nm solid-state lasers, and the respective emissions were collected in the 408–521 and 605–707 nm ranges. Four mosaics were built, each containing 5 × 5 fields for each sample. Parasite adhesion and infection were quantified by counting 100 RAW 264.7 cells per sample. For adhesion studies, the number of macrophages with adhered parasites and total adhered parasites were recorded to calculate the average adhered parasites per adhered macrophage and the adhesion rate. Adhesion rate was defined as the proportion of macrophages with at least one promastigote adhered to their surface relative to the total number of macrophages counted. For infection studies, the number of infected macrophages and total intracellular parasites were recorded to calculate the average parasite load per infected macrophage and the infection rate. Infection rate was defined as the ratio between the number of macrophages carrying at least one intracellular amastigote and the total number of macrophages. Cell counting was carried out with the Fiji software [50]. As controls, each 8-well chamber slide included one well containing uninfected RAW 264.7 cells and one well containing RAW 264.7 cells infected with parasites that had not been pre-incubated with aptamers.

2.11. Preparation of Maleimide-Functionalized Liposomes

Liposomes were prepared using the thin lipid film hydration method [52]. Briefly, the lipids (all from Avanti Polar Lipids Inc., Alabaster, AL, USA) 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(maleimide(polyethylene glycol)-2000) (DSPE-PEG-Mal), cholesterol, and carboxyfluorescein-phosphatidylethanolamine (CF-PE) (74.5:5:20:0.5 molar ratio) were mixed in chloroform in a glass vial. The thin film obtained following the evaporation of chloroform under a nitrogen stream was hydrated in the PBS volume necessary to obtain a final lipid concentration of 10 mM, followed by three rounds of constant vortexing for 2 min, and bath sonication at 35 °C for 3 min. Then, liposomes were extruded through 200 nm polycarbonate membranes with a mini extruder device (Avanti Polar Lipids Inc.), and stored at 4 °C until used. The conjugation of aptamers to liposomes was performed using the thiol-maleimide cross-linking reaction between the maleimide group in DSPE-PEG-Mal and the C6-thiol-modified aptamers in their 5’ end (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA). Prior to conjugation with liposomes, aptamers were subjected to a chemical reduction where 100 μM aptamer was treated with 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the solution was passed through a ZebaTM Spin Desalting Column (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to remove unreacted DTT. The purified aptamers (12.5 µM) were pre-folded as described above and conjugated to maleimide-containing liposomes (1:40 aptamer:DSPE-PEG-Mal ratio) by incubation overnight at 4 °C, followed by ultracentrifugation to remove free aptamers from the liposome suspension. The size, polydispersity index and zeta potential of liposomes (diluted 1:100 in PBS) were measured in a Zetasizer NanoZS90 (Malvern Ltd., Malvern, UK). The amount of DNA in aptamer-functionalized liposomes was calculated using a Nanodrop 2000, following measurements of 260/280 and 260/230 ratios. Data were normalized using the values obtained for plain liposomes.

2.12. Targeting of Aptamer-Functionalized Liposomes to L. infantum Promastigotes

For targeting assays, 2 × 107 promastigotes/mL were washed three times with PBS through centrifugation (680× g, 3 min) and subsequently fixed for 15 min with 200 µL of 4% PFA. Promastigotes were then washed as above to remove PFA, and the final pellet containing promastigotes was suspended in PBS. A volume of 10 µL of fluorescent liposomes (plain, LP-LiGP63Apt-4, and LP-LiGP63Apt-28) was added to 2 × 106 fixed promastigotes (100 µL final volume) and incubated for 3 h. During the last 10 min of incubation, Hoechst 33342 was added at a final concentration of 4 µg/µL. Promastigotes were then washed three times, the pellet was taken up in 100 µL of PBS, and a 1:10 dilution in PBS was done and analyzed in a five-laser LSRFortessa flow cytometer with a 20-parameter standard configuration. A total of 10,000 events per sample were recorded, and the promastigote population was selected based on the forward- and side-scattering intensities, having as reference parasites stained only with Hoechst 33342. The excitation of Hoechst 33342 and carboxyfluorescein was done with 350 and 488 nm lasers, respectively, and the corresponding fluorescence emissions were collected with 450/50 and 525/50 nm bandpass filters.

2.13. Promastigote Growth Inhibition Assay

Promastigotes were grown at 26 °C in complete Schneider’s medium (supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin–streptomycin and 1% sterile human urine) in 96-well microtiter plates (Nunclon Delta surface; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Serial 1:2 dilutions of the five pre-folded aptamers (LiGP63Apt-4, -10, -23, -27 and -28) were done in complete Schneider’s medium (volume per well: 100 µL), starting with a maximum concentration of 5 µM for each individual aptamer and 2.5 µM for amphotericin B. Subsequently, promastigotes from a culture in the logarithmic growth phase were centrifuged for 3 min at 680× g, and the pellet containing the parasites was suspended in 1 mL of complete Schneider’s medium. A 1:100 dilution was made with 4% PFA to determine promastigote concentration in a Neubauer counting chamber. Once the concentration was determined, 100 µL of complete Schneider’s medium containing 2 × 106 promastigotes/mL was added to each well. The plate was incubated at 26 °C for 48 h, after which 0.00125% resazurin sodium salt was added. After a further 24 h, resorufin fluorescence was measured (λex/em: 535/590 nm) in a Tecan Infinite 200 PRO equipment (Tecan Trading AG).

2.14. Statistical Data Analysis

Unless otherwise indicated, experiments were performed in triplicate, and the results are expressed as mean values ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Differences between samples were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance using GraphPad Prism 8.4 (GraphPad software, La Jolla, CA, USA), considering a significant p-value < 0.05. Mean values and SEM were calculated using Microsoft Office Excel version 2306.

3. Results

3.1. Aptamer Selection Against L. infantum GP63

GP63 is encoded by eight genes in L. infantum [13], GP63-2 (LINF_100010200) being the isoform used here for aptamer selection. The mature form of L. infantum GP63 (LiGP63m) was used due to its high sequence homology with the crystallized mature GP63 from L. major [10] and with most GP63 isoforms encoded in L. infantum, supporting its use as a representative isoform for this proof-of-concept study. LiGP63m, spanning from Val97 to Asn574 and lacking the N-terminal propeptide that keeps the enzyme inactive during translation (Figure 2A), was cloned into the pGEX-5X-1 vector and expressed in C41 E. coli with a GST tag to facilitate protein purification (Figure S1A). GST-LiGP63m bound to Sepharose–glutathione beads was used as a target for a bead-based SELEX process (Figure 2B). Specific DNA aptamers targeting LiGP63m were selected from an initial ssDNA library after several SELEX rounds. The forward primer used for PCR amplification was labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM), allowing for the binding of the aptamer pools to fixed L. infantum promastigotes to be tracked using flow cytometry (Figure 2C). As observed, the 6-FAM-ssDNA pool from cycle 7 targeted a significantly higher proportion of the promastigote population (65%) than the cycle 2 pool (5%) or the negative control aptamer Apt700 (5%), indicating a clear enrichment in oligonucleotide sequences binding LiGP63m in the target cells.

3.2. Isolation and Characterization of Individual LiGP63m-Specific Aptamers

After confirming its specificity for the target cells, the enriched oligonucleotide pool from cycle 7 was cloned into the pJET1.2/blunt plasmid and used to transform E. coli DH5α cells. Twenty colonies were isolated and their plasmid inserts sequenced (Table 1); the resulting aptamers will be henceforth named LiGP63Apt-N, where N corresponds to the respective original colonies. To confirm that the aptamers specifically recognized the target protein and not the GST tag, LiGP63m was cloned into the pColdTM TF plasmid and expressed in C43 E. coli as a 6 × histidine-tagged protein fused to a trigger factor to increase solubility (henceforth referred to as His-TF-LiGP63m; Figure S1B). The purified protein was then used in dot blot assays probed with the 20 aptamer sequences synthesized carrying a 6-FAM group in their 5’ end (Figure S2A). Different degrees of aptamer specificity were observed according to densitometry analysis (Figure S2B), with LiGP63Apt-23, -27 and -28 being the sequences with the highest binding to the target protein. Afterwards, the aptamer binding affinities for fixed L. infantum promastigotes were estimated using fluorescence confocal microscopy (Figure S3) and flow cytometry (Figure S4). All individual aptamers showed a targeting to fixed L. infantum promastigotes, with binding percentages ranging from 60% to 94% based on the quantitative data obtained from the flow cytometry analysis. The aptamer ranking, from the highest to the lowest degree of targeting, was as follows: LiGP63Apt-27>-10>-4>-16>-7>-22>-1>-28>-30>-20>-19>-23>-29>-24>-15>-2>-3>-25>-9>-13. When the propensity to form G-quadruplexes, planar arrays of four guanines which result in stable secondary structures [53], was computationally predicted, 14 of the 20 selected aptamers had a strong likelihood to form them, with a G-score [54] ≥ 38 (Table 1).
Among the 20 aptamers from Table 1, those three with the highest binding affinity to the purified His-TF-LiGP63m according to dot blot assays (LiGP63Apt-23, -27 and -28) and those binding to >90% L.infantum promastigotes according to flow cytometry (LiGP63Apt-4, -10 and -27) were selected for further analysis, LiGP63Apt-27 being the only one meeting both criteria. Computational analysis [55] indicated that these five selected sequences displayed features characteristic of functional aptamers, such as secondary structures containing single-stranded regions, hairpins, and duplex stems (Supplementary Table S1). When the potential presence of G-quadruplexes was empirically evaluated using a ThT-based assay, the fluorescence signal for all five selected aptamers was 3- to 10-fold higher than for the Apt700 negative control (Figure 3), supporting the validity of the in silico predictions.
In dot blot assays (Figure 4), all five aptamers detected LiGP63 in whole L. infantum promastigote lysates and in Triton X-100 extracts, which contained the membrane-associated proteins, in agreement with the expected location of LiGP63 in the plasma membrane. Accordingly, LiGP63 was not detected by any aptamer in RIPA extracts containing cytoskeletal and nuclear proteins. The negative control aptamer Apt700 gave only a weak signal in the whole cell lysate and the Triton X-100 extract, possibly reflecting unspecific interactions.
Flow cytometry targeting analysis of the five selected aptamers showed specific binding to L. infantum promastigotes (>75%, Figure 5A), which correlated well with the fluorescence microscopy observations (Figure 5B). The Apt700 negative control exhibited minimal targeting according to flow cytometry (1.1%) and did not display any detectable fluorescence signal, whereas the LiGP63-specific aptamers produced a strong 6-FAM fluorescence. Remarkably, exposure to different aptamers resulted in different subcellular fluorescence patterns, ranging from a diffuse cytoplasmic distribution (LiGP63Apt-10 and -27) to a pronounced membrane association (LiGP63Apt-4, -27 and -28) or localization to small perinuclear regions (LiGP63Apt-23). These differences probably reflected the binding of individual aptamer sequences to distinct regions of LiGP63, which might be differently exposed within the cell. Although the majority of GP63 is located at the parasite surface (ca. 75%), a small fraction (ca. 1.5%) remains in the endoplasmic reticulum, and the rest is cleaved from the membrane or released to the extracellular space via vesicles [13]. It is likely that this export transit to the cell membrane is responsible for the cytoplasmic signal observed with some aptamers. Because aptamers are single-stranded DNA molecules, their potential association with DNA-containing compartments, including the nucleus and kinetoplast, was assessed. Colocalization analysis using Manders’ coefficient (Supplementary Table S2) revealed values ranging from 0.29 to 0.54, indicating that a portion of the aptamer signal overlaps with Hoechst 33342 staining. These results suggest that, upon fixation, some aptamer molecules interact with nuclear and kinetoplast DNA, while a substantial fraction remains outside these compartments.

3.3. Aptamer Binding Affinity Characterization

The apparent Bmax and KD and the binding affinity for LiGP63m of the selected aptamers was assessed through the incubation of different concentrations of the 6-FAM-labeled aptamers with a fixed amount of His-TF-LiGP63m (2.5 µg) bound to latex beads (Figure S5 and Table 2). The aptamer with the highest Bmax was LiGP63Apt-28, indicating that it was able to bind more sites within the protein than the other aptamers, whereas the lowest value for the apparent KD (i.e., highest affinity) corresponded to LiGP63Apt-27, although all five aptamers had apparent KD values in the one-digit µM range. The aptamer with the highest apparent binding affinity (Bmax/KD) was also LiGP63Apt-27.
The limit of detection of the aptamers for their target protein was determined in an aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay (ALISA, [51]) through the incubation of a fixed concentration of the selected 6-FAM-labeled aptamers (600 nM) with serial dilutions of His-TF-LiGP63m (from 1.8 to 0.11 µg). LiGP63Apt-4, -23, -27 and -28 were able to detect down to 0.45 µg of protein (Figure 6A). As a proof-of-concept to explore the potential use of the selected aptamers as diagnostic tools, an ALISA was performed with a whole parasite lysate, where the amount of protein was used to determine the corresponding number of promastigotes [42]. Aptamers LiGP63Apt-4, -23, -27 and -28 were capable of specifically detecting down to 7500 promastigotes (Figure 6B). In the assayed conditions, the limit of detection of LiGP63Apt-10 was 15,000 promastigotes. Although not statistically significant, at 2000 and 4000 promastigotes, we observed a clear difference in the normalized fluorescence intensity between the control aptamer and LiGP63Apt-28, -27, and -23, with LiGP63Apt-28 consistently showing the highest signal (Figure 6B). This result aligns with its highest apparent B m a x value from the saturation binding analysis (Table 2), suggesting a higher number of binding sites, which enables enhanced antigen capture. However, according to the binding equation B = Bmax · L/(KD + L), where B is the bound ligand concentration and L the free ligand concentration, the superior binding potential of LiGP63Apt-27 (Bmax/KD ratio) predicts a better ligand recognition at lower parasitemias. Nonetheless, to solve this apparent discrepancy and confirm the relative sensitivities, more precise methods, such as surface plasmon resonance, will be needed to confirm the real values of KD and Bmax, along with more sensitive methods to determine the limit of detection of the parasites.

3.4. Effect of Aptamers in the Infection of Macrophages by L. infantum

The aptamers LiGP63Apt-4, -27 and -28 were used to evaluate, through confocal fluorescence microscopy, their potential for reducing the parasite adhesion to and infection of macrophages (Figure 7). When RAW 264.7 macrophages were exposed to L. infantum promastigotes pre-incubated for 1 h with 1 µM of pre-folded LiGP63Apt-4, -27 or -28 aptamers, a significant reduction was observed for LiGP63Apt-27 and -28 in the adhesion rate (fraction of macrophages in close contact with at least one parasite) compared to control cells exposed to L. infantum promastigotes non-treated or pre-treated with the Apt700 unspecific aptamer (Figure 7B). In contrast, the average number of adhered parasites per adhered macrophage was significantly reduced only for LiGP63Apt-27 (Figure 7C). Similarly, a clear reduction in the infection rate (fraction of macrophages with at least one intracellular parasite) was detected when parasites were pre-treated with aptamers (Figure 7D). However, the average number of internalized parasites per infected macrophage remained unchanged in aptamer-treated samples (Figure 7E), suggesting that, once parasites are internalized, their capacity to survive or replicate within macrophages is not significantly affected, and that the observed differences reflect interferences with parasite intake rather than with intracellular growth. An amount of 5 µM of either aptamer had no effect on the viability of promastigotes for up to 72 h of incubation (Figure S6), indicating that the observed decrease in infectivity was not due to promastigote death.

3.5. Assessment of Aptamers as Targeting Moieties of Liposomes

Aptamers LiGP63Apt-4 and -28, which significantly reduced macrophage infection rates by L. infantum promastigotes and bound L. infantum promastigote plasma membranes according to fluorescence microscopy images (Figure 5), were selected to test their potential as targeting elements on liposomes for the improved delivery of encapsulated drugs to promastigotes. Aptamers functionalized at their 5’ end with a thiol group were covalently conjugated onto maleimide-containing liposomes. Aptamer binding was assessed through a measurement of the change in the zeta potential of liposomes to a more negative value, and through the corresponding detection of DNA bound to them [56] (Table 3). Physicochemical characteristics like size and polydispersity index were maintained, indicating that the liposome stability was not affected by the conjugation of aptamers.
A flow cytometry assay was conducted to determine whether aptamers conjugated to liposomes could serve as targeting elements for nanocarrier-based drug delivery to L. infantum promastigotes. The targeting efficiencies of liposomes functionalized with LiGP63Apt-4 and LiGP63Apt-28 (LP-LiGP63Apt-4 and -28) were compared with those of plain liposomes (LP) after 3 h of incubation with fixed promastigotes. Liposome binding to promastigotes was detected by measuring the fluorescence of the lipid carboxyfluorescein–phosphatidylethanolamine (CF-PE), which was incorporated in the liposome formulation. The fluorescence signal was significantly higher when promastigotes were incubated with LP-LiGP63Apt-4 (p < 0.0001) or LP-LiGP63Apt-28 (p < 0.01), relative to those incubated with plain liposomes (Figure 8).

4. Discussion

Aptamers represent an attractive tool for biomedical research in diagnostic and therapeutic applications [57,58]. Within the leishmaniasis elimination framework, aptamers can be employed as ligands to functionalize nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery, as diagnostic tools for detecting specific antigens, to study molecular interactions between parasite and host cells, or as therapeutic agents operating through different mechanisms, such as inhibiting essential protein activities or blocking interactions between molecules. In this work, the five aptamers with highest binding affinity to the purified recombinant LiGP63protein in dot blots or best binding to L. infantum promastigotes in flow cytometry assays were among those with the highest G-scores. The formation of G-quadruplex structures in these aptamers was experimentally confirmed using a ThT-based fluorescence assay. Aptamers containing G-quadruplexes are particularly adequate for therapeutic, diagnostic and drug delivery applications [59], in part due to their thermodynamic and chemical stability, low immunogenicity and resistance to serum nucleases. Remarkably, G-quadruplexes are characterized by an enhanced cellular uptake [60], which is an important property regarding potential intracellular targets. LiGP63Apt-27, the aptamer with the highest G-score, was also the one with the best binding potential (i.e., with better ligand recognition at lower parasitemias).
Following the inoculation of Leishmania promastigotes in the dermis, parasite movement is facilitated by the extracellular matrix degradation mediated by GP63 [61]. Because the interaction of GP63 with macrophage receptors is crucial for Leishmania invasion [12], aptamers binding to GP63 may interfere with it, reducing parasite adhesion and subsequent internalization and thereby decreasing infection rates. This scenario aligns well with the results obtained in the present work (Figure 7), suggesting that aptamers may modulate the association between promastigotes and macrophages. Further validation of the aptamers in human macrophage cell lines should be addressed before eventual entry in the preclinical development pipeline.
An important element of the host innate response to infection by pathogens is complement-mediated lysis. The complement subunit C3b participates in the phagocytosis of Leishmania by macrophages through its interaction with the complement receptors CR3 or CR1 and fibronectin receptors [12,62,63,64]. The role of GP63 in the inactivation of the complement by increasing the conversion of C3b into the inactive complement fragment iC3b [65] is a key process that allows Leishmania survival in the mammalian host, as illustrated by the susceptibility to the complement-mediated lysis of L. major promastigotes deficient in GP63 [66]. In addition, complement inactivation has been shown to facilitate L. major capture by macrophages through increased phagocytosis by CR1, the C3b receptor [67]. Finally, the mammalian β-galactosidase-binding galectin-3, which has been described to be part of the antileishmanial host defense [68,69] through the binding of promastigotes [70], is cleaved by GP63, which prevents the formation of galectin-3 lattices that play a role in the initial immune response to Leishmania infection [71]. The aptamer interaction with GP63 in promastigotes might neutralize its activity, eventually increasing the susceptibility of Leishmania to complement, reducing macrophage entry, and increasing exposure to the immune system.
Although no GP63 inhibitors have reached preclinical studies, some of them have shown significant activity, such as Glycoside-2 (IC50 of 1.13 µM in L. donovani promastigotes [72]), benzimidazole compounds (IC50 of 0.62 to 0.92 µg/mL in L. major promastigotes [73]), and the 7-hydroxycoumarin derivative L1 compound (IC50 of 1.24 µM in Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes [74]). Given the scarcity of therapeutic candidates, GP63-binding aptamers that could eventually interfere with its multiple roles should be carefully evaluated as potential antagonists of this protein. Improved anti-GP63 therapeutic aptamers could be obtained with other SELEX designs screening for enzymatic activity inhibition instead of the protein binding-based assay used here. For this alternative strategy, the protease nature of GP63 should be harnessed to incorporate in each cycle a rapid method to select those aptamers inhibiting proteolytic activity.
The current diagnosis strategies for leishmaniasis consist either in the direct microscopic detection of the parasite or in molecular assays, which require specialized personnel and/or expensive equipment not available in most endemic regions. Serological tests are also useful, but only as a complementary method, since they cannot distinguish between current or past infections [2]. By exploiting the proteolytic activity of GP63 for diagnostic approaches, casein was conjugated to gold nanoparticles, which, upon interaction with GP63, enabled the detection of 0.55 parasites/mL [75]. However, because casein can interact with multiple molecules, developing specific aptamers against GP63 could provide a basis for the improved diagnosis of leishmaniasis. In this context, an aptamer-based sensor (aptasensor) stands out as one of the most promising options for transitioning from the bench to a commercially viable point-of-care testing device [37], as illustrated by the aptasensor designed for detecting Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase [76].
Four of the aptamers developed in this work (LiGP63Apt-4, -23, -27 and -28) were capable of detecting endogenous LiGP63 in whole parasite lysates containing down to 7500 promastigotes. Although not statistically significant, LiGP63Apt-23, -27 and -28 showed markedly higher normalized fluorescence signals than the control aptamer down to 2000 promastigotes, suggesting a potential sensitivity beyond the reported limit of detection. This opens the door for exploring other diagnostic tools or optimized ALISA conditions (e.g., enzymatic amplification) to determine if this difference achieves statistical significance, as the direct fluorescence readout from aptamer probes, while sensitive, has a limited precision at the limit of detection. Indeed, when comparing the results of this study with previous works, such as those by the group of Víctor M. González, the limits of detection of 7500 parasites for LiH2A [42] and 6000 for LiH3 [43] were achieved using an enzyme-linked oligonucleotide assay (ELONA) approach. It is anticipated that an ELONA format could enhance detection capabilities due to the signal amplification provided by the enzyme. The eventual development of future aptamer-based diagnostic devices must consider the calculation of affinity constants in the biological fluids where target cells are to be detected. Aptamers with improved sensitivity for the detection of Leishmania could be obtained through whole-cell SELEX, a strategy that allowed the generation of aptamers against Plasmodium falciparum-infected red blood cells [34], whose affinities for intact cells were in the same order of magnitude as those determined here against recombinant purified LiGP63. The elucidation of the 3D structures of the aptamers, e.g., through AlphaFold 3 [77], could help to identify their binding sites on the surface of the protein using modeling or crystallization studies of the aptamer-GP63 complex, allowing for improved binding affinities through a chemical adaptation of the oligonucleotide sequences.
The localization of Leishmania amastigotes within phagolysosomes compromises the access of antileishmanial drugs, requiring long and painful treatment regimens [78]. To overcome this problem, targeted delivery has been reported to ameliorate drug bioavailability, reduce cytotoxicity, expand release kinetics, and improve cellular uptake [79,80]. The functionalization of liposomes with aptamers has been proven to increase targeting to specific cells, boosting the efficacy of encapsulated drugs, such as cisplatin [81] or 5-fluorouracil [82]. The results reported here indicate that liposomes conjugated to anti-LiGP63 aptamers had an improved targeting to promastigotes, thereby potentially enhancing the efficacy of liposome-based drug delivery systems. The covalent link to lipids did not abolish targeting despite the presumed conformational restriction imposed by this type of crosslinking, which suggests that aptamers developed and characterized in solution will maintain most of their selective binding potential when incorporated in nanocarriers designed for targeted drug delivery. Drug leakage and intracellular concentration analyses will be required in the future to fully characterize the therapeutic potential of such nanocapsules.

5. Conclusions

The initial objective of this work was to explore if aptamers generated against an essential Leishmania protein that is abundantly expressed and extracellularly exposed on promastigotes could be used for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. The results presented above indicate that DNA aptamers can be selected with a high in vitro affinity and specificity for the GP63 protein of Leishmania parasites. These aptamers reduce the intake by macrophages of L. infantum promastigotes, detect the protein in live parasites, and can be used to functionalize liposomes for their improved binding of the pathogen. DNA aptamers hold promise in future leishmaniasis control strategies as potential diagnostic and therapeutic tools and as targeting molecules for drug delivery nanocarriers. It will be important to assess the binding characteristics of the aptamers to GP63 proteins from other Leishmania species to ensure that the resulting therapeutic and/or diagnostic product will be universally applicable.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/pharmaceutics18030304/s1, Figure S1: Expression and purification of LiGP63m and Western blot validation. Scheme of (A) pGEX-5X-LiGP63m and (B) pColdTF-LiGP63m plasmids containing the LiGP63m gene. Figure S2: Dot blot analysis of the binding affinity of the individual aptamer sequences for His-TF-LiGp63m. (A) Dot blot. Five µL containing 2.4 µg of His-TF-LiGp63m were dotted on a nitrocellulose membrane, subsequently blotted overnight with 600 nM of each 6-FAM labelled aptamer or with a dilution (1:2500) of an anti-His tag antibody. (B) Quantitative analysis with ImageJ [83] of the dot blot results from panel A, by normalizing the intensity of each dot to that of the anti-His tag antibody (black bar), to which it was assigned an arbitrary value of 100%. The orange bars indicate the aptamers chosen for further characterization. Figure S3: L. infantum promastigotes fixed and stained with 1 µM of 6-FAM-labeled aptamers. Figure S4: Flow cytometry analysis to quantify aptamer targeting to L. infantum fixed promastigotes during an overnight incubation with 1 µM of 6-FAM-labelled aptamers. Figure S5: Aptamer binding affinity characterization. Figure S6: Aptamer in vitro growth inhibition assay in L. infantum promastigote culture. Table S1: Prediction of secondary structures (at 22 °C and 137 mM Na+) in the five selected aptamers according to RNAfold (ViennaRNA package; rna.tbi [55]). Table S2: Manders’ coefficients of the colocalization of fluorescein and Hoechst 33342 signals in the fluorescence microscopy images from Figure 5B.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.R.-Á. and X.F.-B.; Data curation, L.R.-Á., Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B.; Formal analysis, L.R.-Á., Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B.; Funding acquisition, Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B.; Investigation, L.R.-Á., D.C.-A., G.S.O., A.N.F., T.M. and Y.A.-P.; Methodology, L.R.-Á., Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B.; Project administration, Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B.; Resources, Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B.; Supervision, L.R.-Á., Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B.; Visualization, L.R.-Á., Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B.; Writing—original draft, L.R.-Á. and X.F.-B.; Writing—review and editing, L.R.-Á., D.C.-A., G.S.O., A.N.F., T.M., Y.A.-P. and X.F.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants (i) PID2024-156230OB-I00 (X.F.-B. and Y.A.-P.), funded by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades/Agencia Estatal de Investigación (MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, EU); (ii) Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain (http://agaur.gencat.cat/ accessed on 24 February 2026), grant number 2021-SGR-00635 (X.F.-B.). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data supporting the reported results can be found in the main article and in the Supplementary Materials. Further data are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

ISGlobal and IBEC are members of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya. We acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through the “Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019–2023” Program (CEX2018-000806-S). We thank the Cytometry and Cell Sorting Core Facility at the Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS) for their guidance and technical assistance. We are grateful to Miriam Ramírez for her technical contributions and personal support during the preparation of this work, and to Elena Lantero for her previous work on aptamers, which provided valuable guidance for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Health Organization Leishmaniasis Factsheet. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/leishmaniasis (accessed on 5 February 2023).
  2. WHO Expert Committee on the Control of the Leishmaniases; World Health Organization. Control of the Leishmaniases: Report of a Meeting of the WHO Expert Commitee on the Control of Leishmaniases; World Health Organization: Geneva, Swizterland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Burza, S.; Croft, S.L.; Boelaert, M. Leishmaniasis. Lancet 2018, 392, 951–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Attar, Z.J.; Chance, M.L.; el-Safi, S.; Carney, J.; Azazy, A.; El-Hadi, M.; Dourado, C.; Hommel, M. Latex agglutination test for the detection of urinary antigens in visceral leishmaniasis. Acta Trop. 2001, 78, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ghosh, P.; Bhaskar, K.R.; Hossain, F.; Khan, M.A.; Vallur, A.C.; Duthie, M.S.; Hamano, S.; Salam, M.A.; Huda, M.M.; Khan, M.G.; et al. Evaluation of diagnostic performance of rK28 ELISA using urine for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Carstens-Kass, J.; Paulini, K.; Lypaczewski, P.; Matlashewski, G. A review of the leishmanin skin test: A neglected test for a neglected disease. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. De Silva, G.; Somaratne, V.; Senaratne, S.; Vipuladasa, M.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Wickremasinghe, R.; Ranasinghe, S. Efficacy of a new rapid diagnostic test kit to diagnose Sri Lankan cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania donovani. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0187024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kühne, V.; Rezaei, Z.; Pitzinger, P.; Büscher, P. Systematic review on antigens for serodiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis, with a focus on East Africa. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Adams, E.R.; Schoone, G.J.; Ageed, A.F.; Safi, S.E.; Schallig, H.D. Development of a reverse transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the sensitive detection of Leishmania parasites in clinical samples. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010, 82, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schlagenhauf, E.; Etges, R.; Metcalf, P. The crystal structure of the Leishmania major surface proteinase leishmanolysin (gp63). Structure 1998, 6, 1035–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bouvier, J.; Bordier, C.; Vogel, H.; Reichelt, R.; Etges, R. Characterization of the promastigote surface protease of Leishmania as a membrane-bound zinc endopeptidase. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1989, 37, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brittingham, A.; Chen, G.; McGwire, B.S.; Chang, K.P.; Mosser, D.M. Interaction of Leishmania gp63 with cellular receptors for fibronectin. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 4477–4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Isnard, A.; Shio, M.T.; Olivier, M. Impact of Leishmania metalloprotease GP63 on macrophage signaling. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Denise, H.; McNeil, K.; Brooks, D.R.; Alexander, J.; Coombs, G.H.; Mottram, J.C. Expression of multiple CPB genes encoding cysteine proteases is required for Leishmania mexicana virulence in vivo. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 3190–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Casgrain, P.A.; Martel, C.; McMaster, W.R.; Mottram, J.C.; Olivier, M.; Descoteaux, A. Cysteine peptidase B regulates Leishmania mexicana virulence through the modulation of GP63 expression. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Olivier, M.; Atayde, V.D.; Isnard, A.; Hassani, K.; Shio, M.T. Leishmania virulence factors: Focus on the metalloprotease GP63. Microbes Infect. 2012, 14, 1377–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cameron, P.; McGachy, A.; Anderson, M.; Paul, A.; Coombs, G.H.; Mottram, J.C.; Alexander, J.; Plevin, R. Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophage IL-12 production by Leishmania mexicana amastigotes: The role of cysteine peptidases and the NF-κB signaling pathway. J. Immunol. 2004, 173, 3297–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abu-Dayyeh, I.; Shio, M.T.; Sato, S.; Akira, S.; Cousineau, B.; Olivier, M. Leishmania-induced IRAK-1 inactivation is mediated by SHP-1 interacting with an evolutionarily conserved KTIM motif. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2008, 2, e305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Forget, G.; Gregory, D.J.; Whitcombe, L.A.; Olivier, M. Role of host protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 in Leishmania donovani-induced inhibition of nitric oxide production. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 6272–6279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gurjar, D.; Kumar, P.S.; Bodhale, N.; Lenka, N.; Saha, B. Leishmania intercepts IFN-γR signaling at multiple levels in macrophages. Cytokine 2022, 157, 155956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gomez, M.A.; Contreras, I.; Hallé, M.; Tremblay, M.L.; McMaster, R.W.; Olivier, M. Leishmania GP63 alters host signaling through cleavage-activated protein tyrosine phosphatases. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2, ra58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blanchette, J.; Racette, N.; Faure, R.; Siminovitch, K.A.; Olivier, M. Leishmania-induced increases in activation of macrophage SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase are associated with impaired IFN-gamma-triggered JAK2 activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999, 29, 3737–3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martiny, A.; Meyer-Fernandes, J.R.; de Souza, W.; Vannier-Santos, M.A. Altered tyrosine phosphorylation of ERK1 MAP kinase and other macrophage molecules caused by Leishmania amastigotes. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1999, 102, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jaramillo, M.; Gomez, M.A.; Larsson, O.; Shio, M.T.; Topisirovic, I.; Contreras, I.; Luxenburg, R.; Rosenfeld, A.; Colina, R.; McMaster, R.W.; et al. Leishmania repression of host translation through mTOR cleavage is required for parasite survival and infection. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Olivier, M.; Gregory, D.J.; Forget, G. Subversion mechanisms by which Leishmania parasites can escape the host immune response: A signaling point of view. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gregory, D.J.; Godbout, M.; Contreras, I.; Forget, G.; Olivier, M. A novel form of NF-κB is induced by Leishmania infection: Involvement in macrophage gene expression. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Isnard, A.; Christian, J.G.; Kodiha, M.; Stochaj, U.; McMaster, W.R.; Olivier, M. Impact of Leishmania infection on host macrophage nuclear physiology and nucleopore complex integrity. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Arango Duque, G.; Fukuda, M.; Descoteaux, A. Synaptotagmin XI regulates phagocytosis and cytokine secretion in macrophages. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 1737–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arango Duque, G.; Fukuda, M.; Turco, S.J.; Stäger, S.; Descoteaux, A. Leishmania promastigotes induce cytokine secretion in macrophages through the degradation of synaptotagmin XI. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 2363–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Devsani, N.; Vemula, D.; Bhandari, V. The glycoprotein gp63—A potential pan drug target for developing new antileishmanial agents. Biochimie 2023, 207, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lieke, T.; Nylén, S.; Eidsmo, L.; McMaster, W.R.; Mohammadi, A.M.; Khamesipour, A.; Berg, L.; Akuffo, H. Leishmania surface protein gp63 binds directly to human natural killer cells and inhibits proliferation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2008, 153, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hey, A.S.; Theander, T.G.; Hviid, L.; Hazrati, S.M.; Kemp, M.; Kharazmi, A. The major surface glycoprotein (gp63) from Leishmania major and Leishmania donovani cleaves CD4 molecules on human T cells. J. Immunol. 1994, 152, 4542–4548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matheoud, D.; Moradin, N.; Bellemare-Pelletier, A.; Shio, M.T.; Hong, W.J.; Olivier, M.; Gagnon, E.; Desjardins, M.; Descoteaux, A. Leishmania evades host immunity by inhibiting antigen cross-presentation through direct cleavage of the SNARE VAMP8. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lantero, E.; Belavilas-Trovas, A.; Biosca, A.; Recolons, P.; Moles, E.; Sulleiro, E.; Zarzuela, F.; Avalos-Padilla, Y.; Ramírez, M.; Fernàndez-Busquets, X. Development of DNA aptamers against Plasmodium falciparum blood stages using cell-systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2020, 16, 315–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Roca, C.; Avalos-Padilla, Y.; Prieto-Simon, B.; Iglesias, V.; Ramírez, M.; Imperial, S.; Fernàndez-Busquets, X. Selection of an aptamer against the enzyme 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase from Plasmodium falciparum. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ospina-Villa, J.D.; López-Camarillo, C.; Castañón-Sánchez, C.A.; Soto-Sánchez, J.; Ramírez-Moreno, E.; Marchat, L.A. Advances on aptamers against protozoan parasites. Genes 2018, 9, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Futane, A.; Narayanamurthy, V.; Jadhav, P.; Srinivasan, A. Aptamer-based rapid diagnosis for point-of-care application. Microfluid. Nanofluidics 2023, 27, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhou, J.; Rossi, J. Aptamers as targeted therapeutics: Current potential and challenges. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Moreno, M.; Rincón, E.; Piñeiro, D.; Fernández, G.; Domingo, A.; Jiménez-Ruíz, A.; Salinas, M.; González, V.M. Selection of aptamers against KMP-11 using colloidal gold during the SELEX process. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 308, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moreno, M.; González, V.M.; Rincón, E.; Domingo, A.; Domínguez, E. Aptasensor based on the selective electrodeposition of protein-linked gold nanoparticles on screen-printed electrodes. Analyst 2011, 136, 1810–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iborra, S.; Soto, M.; Carrión, J.; Alonso, C.; Requena, J.M. Vaccination with a plasmid DNA cocktail encoding the nucleosomal histones of Leishmania confers protection against murine cutaneous leishmaniosis. Vaccine 2004, 22, 3865–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Martín, M.E.; García-Hernández, M.; García-Recio, E.M.; Gómez-Chacón, G.F.; Sánchez-López, M.; González, V.M. DNA aptamers selectively target Leishmania infantum H2A protein. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Frezza, V.; Pinto-Díez, C.; Fernández, G.; Soto, M.; Martín, M.E.; García-Sacristán, A.; González, V.M. DNA aptamers targeting Leishmania infantum H3 protein as potential diagnostic tools. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1107, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bruno, J.G.; Richarte, A.M.; Phillips, T.; Savage, A.A.; Sivils, J.C.; Greis, A.; Mayo, M.W. Development of a fluorescent enzyme-linked DNA aptamer-magnetic bead sandwich assay and portable fluorometer for sensitive and rapid leishmania detection in sandflies. J. Fluoresc. 2014, 24, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guerra-Pérez, N.; Ramos, E.; García-Hernández, M.; Pinto, C.; Soto, M.; Martín, M.E.; González, V.M. Molecular and functional characterization of ssDNA aptamers that specifically bind Leishmania infantum PABP. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sefah, K.; Shangguan, D.; Xiong, X.; O’Donoghue, M.B.; Tan, W. Development of DNA aptamers using cell-SELEX. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wu, J.; Wang, C.; Li, X.; Song, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, C.; Hu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, W.; et al. Identification, characterization and application of a G-quadruplex structured DNA aptamer against cancer biomarker protein anterior gradient homolog 2. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Y.; Xu, S.; Wu, X.; Xu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Lou, X.; Yang, X. Thioflavin T as a fluorescence light-up probe for both parallel and antiparallel G-quadruplexes of 29-mer thrombin binding aptamer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 8025–8036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Manders, E.M.M.; Verbeek, F.J.; Aten, J.A. Measurement of co-localization of objects in dual-colour confocal images. J. Microsc. 1993, 169, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Taneja, V.; Goel, M.; Shankar, U.; Kumar, A.; Khilnani, G.C.; Prasad, H.K.; Prasad, G.B.K.S.; Gupta, U.D.; Sharma, T.K. An aptamer linked immobilized sorbent assay (ALISA) to detect circulatory IFN-α, an inflammatory protein among tuberculosis patients. ACS Comb. Sci. 2020, 22, 656–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. MacDonald, R.C.; MacDonald, R.I.; Menco, B.P.; Takeshita, K.; Subbarao, N.K.; Hu, L.R. Small-volume extrusion apparatus for preparation of large, unilamellar vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1991, 1061, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gatto, B.; Palumbo, M.; Sissi, C. Nucleic acid aptamers based on the G-quadruplex structure: Therapeutic and diagnostic potential. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009, 16, 1248–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kikin, O.; D’Antonio, L.; Bagga, P.S. QGRS Mapper: A web-based server for predicting G-quadruplexes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W676–W682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sullivan, R.; Adams, M.C.; Naik, R.R.; Milam, V.T. Analyzing secondary structure patterns in DNA aptamers identified via CompELS. Molecules 2019, 24, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Alshaer, W.; Hillaireau, H.; Vergnaud, J.; Ismail, S.; Fattal, E. Functionalizing liposomes with anti-CD44 aptamer for selective targeting of cancer cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 2015, 26, 1307–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Li, L.; Xu, S.; Yan, H.; Li, X.; Yazd, H.S.; Li, X.; Huang, T.; Cui, C.; Jiang, J.; Tan, W. Nucleic acid aptamers for molecular diagnostics and therapeutics: Advances and perspectives. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 2221–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, J.; Zhou, J.; Peng, Y.; Xie, Y.; Xiao, Y. Aptamers: A prospective tool for infectious diseases diagnosis. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022, 36, e24725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Roxo, C.; Kotkowiak, W.; Pasternak, A. G-quadruplex-forming aptamers-Characteristics, applications, and perspectives. Molecules 2019, 24, 3781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chang, T.; Qi, C.; Meng, J.; Zhang, N.; Bing, T.; Yang, X.; Cao, Z.; Shangguan, D. General cell-binding activity of intramolecular G-quadruplexes with parallel structure. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. McGwire, B.S.; Chang, K.P.; Engman, D.M. Migration through the extracellular matrix by the parasitic protozoan Leishmania is enhanced by surface metalloprotease gp63. Infect. Immun. 2003, 71, 1008–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vieira de Morais, C.G.; Castro Lima, A.K.; Terra, R.; Freire dos Santos, R.; Gonçalves Da-Silva, S.A.; Lourenço Dutra, P.M. The dialogue of the host-parasite relationship: Leishmania spp. and Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 324915. [Google Scholar]
  63. Filho, A.A.P.; Nascimento, A.A.S.; Saab, N.A.A.; Fugiwara, R.T.; D’Ávila Pessoa, G.C.; Koerich, L.B.; Pereira, M.H.; Araújo, R.N.; Sant’Anna, M.R.V.; Gontijo, N.F. Evasion of the complement system by Leishmania through the uptake of factor H, a complement regulatory protein. Acta Trop. 2021, 224, 106152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Soulat, D.; Bogdan, C. Function of macrophage and parasite phosphatases in leishmaniasis. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Brittingham, A.; Morrison, C.J.; McMaster, W.R.; McGwire, B.S.; Chang, K.P.; Mosser, D.M. Role of the Leishmania surface protease gp63 in complement fixation, cell adhesion, and resistance to complement-mediated lysis. J. Immunol. 1995, 155, 3102–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Joshi, P.B.; Kelly, B.L.; Kamhawi, S.; Sacks, D.L.; McMaster, W.R. Targeted gene deletion in Leishmania major identifies leishmanolysin (GP63) as a virulence factor. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2002, 120, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Da Silva, R.P.; Hall, B.F.; Joiner, K.A.; Sacks, D.L. CR1, the C3b receptor, mediates binding of infective Leishmania major metacyclic promastigotes to human macrophages. J. Immunol. 1989, 143, 617–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bhaumik, P.; St-Pierre, G.; Milot, V.; St-Pierre, C.; Sato, S. Galectin-3 facilitates neutrophil recruitment as an innate immune response to a parasitic protozoa cutaneous infection. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 630–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fermino, M.L.; Dias, F.C.; Lopes, C.D.; Souza, M.A.; Cruz, A.K.; Liu, F.T.; Chammas, R.; Roque-Barreira, M.C.; Rabinovich, G.A.; Bernardes, E.S. Galectin-3 negatively regulates the frequency and function of CD4(+) CD25(+) Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells and influences the course of Leishmania major infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013, 43, 1806–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pelletier, I.; Sato, S. Specific recognition and cleavage of galectin-3 by Leishmania major through species-specific polygalactose epitope. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 17663–17670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sato, S.; Bhaumik, P.; St-Pierre, G.; Pelletier, I. Role of galectin-3 in the initial control of Leishmania infection. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 34, 147–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chakrabarti, A.; Narayana, C.; Joshi, N.; Garg, S.; Garg, L.C.; Ranganathan, A.; Sagar, R.; Pati, S.; Singh, S. Metalloprotease Gp63-targeting novel glycoside exhibits potential antileishmanial activity. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 803048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Shaukat, A.; Mirza, H.M.; Ansari, A.H.; Yasinzai, M.; Zaidi, S.Z.; Dilshad, S.; Ansari, F.L. Benzimidazole derivatives: Synthesis, leishmanicidal effectiveness, and molecular docking studies. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 3606–3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Moreno, C.J.G.; Farias, H.M.; Medeiros, R.; Brito, T.; Oliveira, J.; de Sousa, F.L.J.; de Medeiros, M.J.C.; Amorim, B.; Santos-Gomes, G.; Pontes, D.; et al. Quantum biochemistry screening and in vitro evaluation of Leishmania metalloproteinase inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Diouani, M.F.; Ouerghi, O.; Belgacem, K.; Sayhi, M.; Ionescu, R.; Laouini, D. Casein-conjugated gold nanoparticles for amperometric detection of Leishmania infantum. Biosensors 2019, 9, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Lee, S.; Song, K.M.; Jeon, W.; Jo, H.; Shim, Y.B.; Ban, C. A highly sensitive aptasensor towards Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of malaria. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 35, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Abramson, J.; Adler, J.; Dunger, J.; Evans, R.; Green, T.; Pritzel, A.; Ronneberger, O.; Willmore, L.; Ballard, A.J.; Bambrick, J.; et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 2024, 630, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bates, P.A.; Rogers, M.E. New insights into the developmental biology and transmission mechanisms of Leishmania. Curr. Mol. Med. 2004, 4, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. de Almeida, L.; Terumi Fujimura, A.; Del Cistia, M.L.; Fonseca-Santos, B.; Braga Imamura, K.; Michels, P.A.M.; Chorilli, M.; Graminha, M.A.S. Nanotechnological strategies for treatment of leishmaniasis—A review. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2017, 13, 117–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sun, Y.; Chen, D.; Pan, Y.; Qu, W.; Hao, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Xie, S. Nanoparticles for antiparasitic drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2019, 26, 1206–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cao, Z.; Tong, R.; Mishra, A.; Xu, W.; Wong, G.C.; Cheng, J.; Lu, Y. Reversible cell-specific drug delivery with aptamer-functionalized liposomes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2009, 48, 6494–6498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cadinoiu, A.N.; Rata, D.M.; Atanase, L.I.; Daraba, O.M.; Gherghel, D.; Vochita, G.; Popa, M. Aptamer-functionalized liposomes as a potential treatment for basal cell carcinoma. Polymers 2019, 11, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of GP63 functions in Leishmania [16,30]. GP63 facilitates parasite migration through the extracellular matrix by degrading its components and protects Leishmania from complement-mediated lysis by cleaving complement component 3b (C3b) into its proteolytically inactive form (iC3b), which can bind to complement receptor types 1 and 3. GP63 binds macrophage fibronectin receptors, promoting adhesion of promastigotes to host cells. GP63 is secreted by promastigotes either via the classical secretory pathway through the flagellar pocket or via exosomes. It is believed that GP63 enters the macrophage cytoplasm through lipid rafts, where it cleaves and activates tyrosine phosphatases, such as SHP-1. This activation downregulates signaling pathways, including JAK2/STAT1α, which leads to an altered macrophage function. GP63 also modulates transcriptional regulation by inhibiting the mTOR pathway and targeting transcription factors such as AP-1 or NF-κB in the perinuclear region. In the amastigote stage, GP63 is thought to protect the parasite from the harsh phagolysosomal environment. Together, these functions promote Leishmania survival within host cells [16,30].
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of GP63 functions in Leishmania [16,30]. GP63 facilitates parasite migration through the extracellular matrix by degrading its components and protects Leishmania from complement-mediated lysis by cleaving complement component 3b (C3b) into its proteolytically inactive form (iC3b), which can bind to complement receptor types 1 and 3. GP63 binds macrophage fibronectin receptors, promoting adhesion of promastigotes to host cells. GP63 is secreted by promastigotes either via the classical secretory pathway through the flagellar pocket or via exosomes. It is believed that GP63 enters the macrophage cytoplasm through lipid rafts, where it cleaves and activates tyrosine phosphatases, such as SHP-1. This activation downregulates signaling pathways, including JAK2/STAT1α, which leads to an altered macrophage function. GP63 also modulates transcriptional regulation by inhibiting the mTOR pathway and targeting transcription factors such as AP-1 or NF-κB in the perinuclear region. In the amastigote stage, GP63 is thought to protect the parasite from the harsh phagolysosomal environment. Together, these functions promote Leishmania survival within host cells [16,30].
Pharmaceutics 18 00304 g001
Figure 2. Strategy followed for the selection of aptamers against L. infantum GP63. (A) Domain scheme of L. infantum GP63-2 indicating the LiGP63m region used for aptamer selection. (B) Diagram of the bead-based SELEX process used to obtain aptamers against GST-LiGP63m. The methodology involves iterative cycles of: (1) incubation of GST-beads with the initial ssDNA library, (2) removal of the oligonucleotides bound to GST-beads, (3) incubation of GST-beads–unbound oligonucleotides with GST-LiGP63m beads, (4) extraction of the oligonucleotides bound to target beads, (5) amplification of the bound oligonucleotides through PCR with reverse and forward primers labeled on their 5’ ends with biotin and 6-FAM, respectively, (6) purification of the 6-FAM-labeled DNA strand upon retention of the biotinylated strand in a neutravidin column, and (7) incubation of the 6-FAM-labeled ssDNA pool resulting from each SELEX cycle with GST-LiGP63m beads, to start a new cycle. A counter-selection step, performed every three cycles, is indicated with purple boxes, where (a) the ssDNA purified from one cycle is incubated with GST-beads, (b) ssDNA sequences bound to GST beads are removed, and (c) the unbound sequences are incubated with GST-LiGP63m beads to start a new cycle. After seven cycles (plus three counter-selection steps), the aptamer pool was cloned and sequenced. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the binding of 6-FAM-labeled aptamer pools from cycles 2, 4 and 7 to L. infantum promastigotes. The randomly selected unspecific Apt700 sequence [34] was included as negative control.
Figure 2. Strategy followed for the selection of aptamers against L. infantum GP63. (A) Domain scheme of L. infantum GP63-2 indicating the LiGP63m region used for aptamer selection. (B) Diagram of the bead-based SELEX process used to obtain aptamers against GST-LiGP63m. The methodology involves iterative cycles of: (1) incubation of GST-beads with the initial ssDNA library, (2) removal of the oligonucleotides bound to GST-beads, (3) incubation of GST-beads–unbound oligonucleotides with GST-LiGP63m beads, (4) extraction of the oligonucleotides bound to target beads, (5) amplification of the bound oligonucleotides through PCR with reverse and forward primers labeled on their 5’ ends with biotin and 6-FAM, respectively, (6) purification of the 6-FAM-labeled DNA strand upon retention of the biotinylated strand in a neutravidin column, and (7) incubation of the 6-FAM-labeled ssDNA pool resulting from each SELEX cycle with GST-LiGP63m beads, to start a new cycle. A counter-selection step, performed every three cycles, is indicated with purple boxes, where (a) the ssDNA purified from one cycle is incubated with GST-beads, (b) ssDNA sequences bound to GST beads are removed, and (c) the unbound sequences are incubated with GST-LiGP63m beads to start a new cycle. After seven cycles (plus three counter-selection steps), the aptamer pool was cloned and sequenced. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the binding of 6-FAM-labeled aptamer pools from cycles 2, 4 and 7 to L. infantum promastigotes. The randomly selected unspecific Apt700 sequence [34] was included as negative control.
Pharmaceutics 18 00304 g002
Figure 3. ThT assay for the detection of G-quadruplex structures. (A) Relative fluorescence emission intensity of anti-LiGP63 aptamers treated with ThT. Apt700 was included as a negative control of aptamer not forming G-quadruplexes. Aptamers and ThT were used at a concentration of 1 µM. (B) Statistical significance analysis of RFU values at the 490 nm peak compared to the negative control aptamer, calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. **** p < 0.0001; RFUs: relative fluorescence units; a.u.: arbitrary units.
Figure 3. ThT assay for the detection of G-quadruplex structures. (A) Relative fluorescence emission intensity of anti-LiGP63 aptamers treated with ThT. Apt700 was included as a negative control of aptamer not forming G-quadruplexes. Aptamers and ThT were used at a concentration of 1 µM. (B) Statistical significance analysis of RFU values at the 490 nm peak compared to the negative control aptamer, calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. **** p < 0.0001; RFUs: relative fluorescence units; a.u.: arbitrary units.
Pharmaceutics 18 00304 g003
Figure 4. Dot blot assay to determine the specificity of the selected aptamers towards LiGP63. His-TF-LiGP63m, GST, whole L. infantum promastigote lysate and Triton X-100 and RIPA extracts were dotted on a nitrocellulose membrane (1.25 µg of protein in 2.5 µL) and incubated with 600 nM of 6-FAM-labeled aptamers or with antibodies, whose binding was detected as indicated in the Section 2. Apt700 was used as an unspecific aptamer control. Anti-tubulin confirmed the presence of cytoskeleton components in L. infantum total lysate and in RIPA extract.
Figure 4. Dot blot assay to determine the specificity of the selected aptamers towards LiGP63. His-TF-LiGP63m, GST, whole L. infantum promastigote lysate and Triton X-100 and RIPA extracts were dotted on a nitrocellulose membrane (1.25 µg of protein in 2.5 µL) and incubated with 600 nM of 6-FAM-labeled aptamers or with antibodies, whose binding was detected as indicated in the Section 2. Apt700 was used as an unspecific aptamer control. Anti-tubulin confirmed the presence of cytoskeleton components in L. infantum total lysate and in RIPA extract.
Pharmaceutics 18 00304 g004
Figure 5. Targeting analysis of the five 6-FAM-labeled selected aptamers to fixed L. infantum promastigotes, studied by (A) flow cytometry and (B) confocal fluorescence microscopy. Cytometry panels show arbitrary fluorescence units. Percentages in (A) indicate the fraction of promastigotes positive for 6-FAM (upper right quadrant in each panel, blue color). DIC: differential interference contrast. Merge refers to Hoechst 33342 and 6-FAM channels only; merge-2 panels are zoomed regions of the corresponding merge panels. Scale bar is 10 µm for all microscopy panels, except for those in the last column, where it is 5 µm.
Figure 5. Targeting analysis of the five 6-FAM-labeled selected aptamers to fixed L. infantum promastigotes, studied by (A) flow cytometry and (B) confocal fluorescence microscopy. Cytometry panels show arbitrary fluorescence units. Percentages in (A) indicate the fraction of promastigotes positive for 6-FAM (upper right quadrant in each panel, blue color). DIC: differential interference contrast. Merge refers to Hoechst 33342 and 6-FAM channels only; merge-2 panels are zoomed regions of the corresponding merge panels. Scale bar is 10 µm for all microscopy panels, except for those in the last column, where it is 5 µm.
Pharmaceutics 18 00304 g005
Figure 6. ALISA analysis of the limit of detection of the selected aptamers for LiGP63m and L. infantum promastigotes. (A) Sensitivity of the aptamers for the detection of His-TF-LiGP63m. The immobilized protein amount varied between 1.8 and 0.11 µg, while the concentration of aptamer was fixed at 600 nM. GST was incubated at the two highest protein concentrations used (1.8 and 0.9 µg) as a negative binding control. RFUs: relative fluorescence units. Average ± SEM of three different experiments is shown (n = 3). (B) Sensitivity of the selected aptamers for the detection of L. infantum promastigotes. Assays were done with total lysate from L. infantum promastigotes that corresponded to a number of parasites ranging from 938 to 30,000. Average ± SEM of three different experiments is shown (n = 3). Statistical significance compared to the unspecific Apt700 was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 6. ALISA analysis of the limit of detection of the selected aptamers for LiGP63m and L. infantum promastigotes. (A) Sensitivity of the aptamers for the detection of His-TF-LiGP63m. The immobilized protein amount varied between 1.8 and 0.11 µg, while the concentration of aptamer was fixed at 600 nM. GST was incubated at the two highest protein concentrations used (1.8 and 0.9 µg) as a negative binding control. RFUs: relative fluorescence units. Average ± SEM of three different experiments is shown (n = 3). (B) Sensitivity of the selected aptamers for the detection of L. infantum promastigotes. Assays were done with total lysate from L. infantum promastigotes that corresponded to a number of parasites ranging from 938 to 30,000. Average ± SEM of three different experiments is shown (n = 3). Statistical significance compared to the unspecific Apt700 was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).
Pharmaceutics 18 00304 g006
Figure 7. Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of the effect of anti-LiGP63 aptamers on L. infantum adhesion to and intake by macrophages. Promastigotes were preincubated for 1 h with 1 µM of the indicated aptamers prior to infection of RAW 264.7 macrophages. Cells were incubated overnight, fixed, and imaged through confocal fluorescence microscopy, and finally parasite adhesion to and internalization in macrophages was quantified. (A) Representative confocal fluorescence microscopy images of the samples treated with Apt700 and with LiGP63Apt-28, showing L. infantum parasites adhered to or internalized within macrophages. White arrowheads indicate parasites in contact with macrophage membranes, and yellow asterisks indicate L. infantum inside macrophages. (B) Adhesion rate, expressed as the percentage of macrophages carrying at least one adhered parasite. (C) Adhered parasites per adhered cell (average number of parasites attached to macrophages with at least one adhered parasite). (D) Infection rate, expressed as the percentage of macrophages carrying at least one intracellular L. infantum amastigote. (E) Intracellular parasites per infected cell (average parasite number per infected macrophage). For each condition, 100 cells were analyzed. Mean values ± SEM of two different experiments are shown (n = 2). Statistical significance compared to macrophages exposed to untreated promastigotes was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. * p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis of the effect of anti-LiGP63 aptamers on L. infantum adhesion to and intake by macrophages. Promastigotes were preincubated for 1 h with 1 µM of the indicated aptamers prior to infection of RAW 264.7 macrophages. Cells were incubated overnight, fixed, and imaged through confocal fluorescence microscopy, and finally parasite adhesion to and internalization in macrophages was quantified. (A) Representative confocal fluorescence microscopy images of the samples treated with Apt700 and with LiGP63Apt-28, showing L. infantum parasites adhered to or internalized within macrophages. White arrowheads indicate parasites in contact with macrophage membranes, and yellow asterisks indicate L. infantum inside macrophages. (B) Adhesion rate, expressed as the percentage of macrophages carrying at least one adhered parasite. (C) Adhered parasites per adhered cell (average number of parasites attached to macrophages with at least one adhered parasite). (D) Infection rate, expressed as the percentage of macrophages carrying at least one intracellular L. infantum amastigote. (E) Intracellular parasites per infected cell (average parasite number per infected macrophage). For each condition, 100 cells were analyzed. Mean values ± SEM of two different experiments are shown (n = 2). Statistical significance compared to macrophages exposed to untreated promastigotes was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. * p < 0.05.
Pharmaceutics 18 00304 g007
Figure 8. Liposome targeting to L. infantum promastigotes. Flow cytometry analysis of CF-PE-labeled liposomes, either plain or conjugated to LiGP63Apt-4 and -28, incubated with fixed L. infantum promastigotes. Mean values ± SD are indicated (n = 3). Statistical significance compared to untreated parasites was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. CF: carboxyfluorescein; LP: liposome.
Figure 8. Liposome targeting to L. infantum promastigotes. Flow cytometry analysis of CF-PE-labeled liposomes, either plain or conjugated to LiGP63Apt-4 and -28, incubated with fixed L. infantum promastigotes. Mean values ± SD are indicated (n = 3). Statistical significance compared to untreated parasites was calculated using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001. CF: carboxyfluorescein; LP: liposome.
Pharmaceutics 18 00304 g008
Table 1. Sequences and G-scores of the 20 aptamers selected from the pool obtained after 7 SELEX cycles. The sequence of the unspecific aptamer Apt700 [34] is included (shadowed in gray). For those sequences where more than one G-score was obtained, only the highest is indicated.
Table 1. Sequences and G-scores of the 20 aptamers selected from the pool obtained after 7 SELEX cycles. The sequence of the unspecific aptamer Apt700 [34] is included (shadowed in gray). For those sequences where more than one G-score was obtained, only the highest is indicated.
AptamerAptamer SequenceG-Score
LiGP63Apt-1ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTATCGGGGGTGGCCAGGTGGGAGGGTGGGCGGGTGCTGGTAAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT42
LiGP63Apt-2TTACCAGCTTATTCAATTGCACATAGGGGGATGGGTGGGTGGGGCTATGTGGTTAGGCAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT41
LiGP63Apt-3ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTACGACCTGACCCAACATCCCGTGCCCCCGTTTAGTAACCGAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT-
LiGP63Apt-4TTACCAGCTTATTCAATTCGTCGGTGGGTGGGTCGGGTGGGGACGAAGTGACGTTTCAAGATAGTAAGTGCAATAT41
LiGP63Apt-7ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTACGGGGACCGTGGGTGGGTGGGGGGGAGGTCCATGGCTTAAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT42
LiGP63Apt-9ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTGCCAGCATATAATAACCGGGCCATACCGCTAACGTCTACCAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT-
LiGP63Apt-10TTACCAGCTTATTCAATTCCATCGGGCGGGGGGGTGGGTAGCATGGAATCAGAGTCGTAGATAGTAAGTGCAATAT42
LiGP63Apt-13ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTATCACAGGCAACACACGCCCGCGGGCTCGCGACGGTAGTGTTGAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT-
LiGP63Apt-15ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTGGGGCGGGCGGGATACGACCTTATTTACCTGCTACTCAGATAGTAAGTGCAATC19
LiGP63Apt-16ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTCGGGATGGGTGGGCGGGGGTGGCGGTTCGGTATGGGGCTTAGATAGTAAGTGCAAATC41
LiGP63Apt-19ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTCGTGCGGGAGGGTGGTACGGGGTGGGAGGCGGGCTGCTGGAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT38
LiGP63Apt-20ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTACGGGCGGGGGCGGGCGGGTGGGGTGCGGCAATTCTCTGGAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT42
LiGP63Apt-22ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTACCGAGGGTGGGGCGGGGGGGCGGGGGAGGAGGAGGTCAGTGCCTCAAGATAGTAAGTGCAATC42
LiGP63Apt-23ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTCTGGTGGGGGGGGCAGGGCGGGTCATACTGCATTACTTGGAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT41
LiGP63Apt-24ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTACCGGGGGGGGAGGGTGGGTCCTGGCGGAAAATGGCGCGGAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT17
LiGP63Apt-25ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTGCTAGGTCACGCACTGGGGTGGGTTGGGTGGGAGTTTACCAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT-
LiGP63Apt-27TTACCAGCTTATTCAATTGCGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGTGGAGGGGGTTGTAACTGTGAGAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT80
LiGP63Apt-28ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTGTACGCGTGTGGGGGTGGGGGGGCGGGTTCATACGGTGAAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT42
LiGP63Apt-29TTACCAGCTTATTCAATTGACGAGAATCGGGGCGGGCGGGGGGGGTAAGCATGATCGGAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT42
LiGP63Apt-30ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTGTGCAGGGGTGTGGGTGGGTGGGCGGGTACGGCTAAGGGTAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT42
Apt700ATACCAGCTTATTCAATTAGTTGTGGTTGCAACTTTTTATTATTTGTTCGTATCTTTAAGATAGTAAGTGCAATCT-
Table 2. Apparent KD, Bmax and binding potential (Bmax/KD) for the selected aptamers, determined from the data obtained in the experiment reported in Figure S5.
Table 2. Apparent KD, Bmax and binding potential (Bmax/KD) for the selected aptamers, determined from the data obtained in the experiment reported in Figure S5.
AptamerApparent KD (µM)Apparent Bmax (a.u.)Bmax/KD
LiGP63Apt-40.631874903
LiGP63Apt-100.6875314,836
LiGP63Apt-230.714,09720,430
LiGP63Apt-270.3839931,107
LiGP63Apt-282.124,24211,544
Apt700 1−0.03434−14,467
1 The apparent KD value for Apt700 had a negative value because of the incorrect fitting in the binding curve data (Figure S5) due to the low affinity for His-TF-LiGP63m of this control aptamer. a.u.: arbitrary units.
Table 3. Determination of size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential and DNA concentration of liposome suspensions, containing 5 mM lipid, with and without aptamer functionalization. The values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). LP: plain liposomes.
Table 3. Determination of size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential and DNA concentration of liposome suspensions, containing 5 mM lipid, with and without aptamer functionalization. The values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). LP: plain liposomes.
Size (nm) ± SDPDI ± SDZeta Potential (mV) ± SD[ssDNA] (ng/µL) ± SD
LP154.7 ± 4.10.12 ± 0.01−7.55 ± 0.260.00 ± 0.00
LP-LiGP63Apt-4141.1 ± 1.20.13 ± 0.03−9.90 ± 0.9841.50 ± 6.50
LP-LiGP63Apt-28114.0 ± 0.60.13 ± 0.03−9.14 ± 1.9768.50 ± 6.61
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Román-Álamo, L.; Currea-Ayala, D.; Oliveira, G.S.; Fallica, A.N.; Mooren, T.; Avalos-Padilla, Y.; Fernàndez-Busquets, X. Development of DNA Aptamers Against Leishmania infantum GP63 Protein for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. Pharmaceutics 2026, 18, 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18030304

AMA Style

Román-Álamo L, Currea-Ayala D, Oliveira GS, Fallica AN, Mooren T, Avalos-Padilla Y, Fernàndez-Busquets X. Development of DNA Aptamers Against Leishmania infantum GP63 Protein for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. Pharmaceutics. 2026; 18(3):304. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18030304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Román-Álamo, Lucía, Daniela Currea-Ayala, Gabriel S. Oliveira, Antonino Nicolò Fallica, Timen Mooren, Yunuen Avalos-Padilla, and Xavier Fernàndez-Busquets. 2026. "Development of DNA Aptamers Against Leishmania infantum GP63 Protein for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications" Pharmaceutics 18, no. 3: 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18030304

APA Style

Román-Álamo, L., Currea-Ayala, D., Oliveira, G. S., Fallica, A. N., Mooren, T., Avalos-Padilla, Y., & Fernàndez-Busquets, X. (2026). Development of DNA Aptamers Against Leishmania infantum GP63 Protein for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. Pharmaceutics, 18(3), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics18030304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop