Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of SET Domain Family Genes in Brassica napus L.
Next Article in Special Issue
The Photoperiod Stress Response in Arabidopsis thaliana Depends on Auxin Acting as an Antagonist to the Protectant Cytokinin
Previous Article in Journal
Regulation of FGF-2, FGF-18 and Transcription Factor Activity by Perlecan in the Maturational Development of Transitional Rudiment and Growth Plate Cartilages and in the Maintenance of Permanent Cartilage Homeostasis
Previous Article in Special Issue
MicroRNAs Are Involved in Regulating Plant Development and Stress Response through Fine-Tuning of TIR1/AFB-Dependent Auxin Signaling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms23041933
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Auxin/Cytokinin Antagonistic Control of the Shoot/Root Growth Ratio and Its Relevance for Adaptation to Drought and Nutrient Deficiency Stresses

by
Jasmina Kurepa
and
Jan A. Smalle
*
Plant Physiology, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology Program, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(4), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041933
Submission received: 1 January 2022 / Revised: 5 February 2022 / Accepted: 7 February 2022 / Published: 9 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perception, Transduction and Crosstalk of Auxin and Cytokinin Signals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The hormones auxin and cytokinin regulate numerous aspects of plant development and often act as an antagonistic hormone pair. One of the more striking examples of the auxin/cytokinin antagonism involves regulation of the shoot/root growth ratio in which cytokinin promotes shoot and inhibits root growth, whereas auxin does the opposite. Control of the shoot/root growth ratio is essential for the survival of terrestrial plants because it allows growth adaptations to water and mineral nutrient availability in the soil. Because a decrease in shoot growth combined with an increase in root growth leads to survival under drought stress and nutrient limiting conditions, it was not surprising to find that auxin promotes, while cytokinin reduces, drought stress tolerance and nutrient uptake. Recent data show that drought stress and nutrient availability also alter the cytokinin and auxin signaling and biosynthesis pathways and that this stress-induced regulation affects cytokinin and auxin in the opposite manner. These antagonistic effects of cytokinin and auxin suggested that each hormone directly and negatively regulates biosynthesis or signaling of the other. However, a growing body of evidence supports unidirectional regulation, with auxin emerging as the primary regulatory component. This master regulatory role of auxin may not come as a surprise when viewed from an evolutionary perspective.

1. Introduction

Adaptive regulation of the shoot/root growth ratio is an evolutionarily conserved developmental mechanism in terrestrial plants, which ensures maximal progeny production under fluctuating environmental conditions. In growth conditions in which water and mineral nutrients are not limiting, shoot growth is favored as it embodies traits that support reproductive success and survival of the species, and root development is limited to a level sufficient to sustain shoot development without the unnecessary depletion of photosynthates [1]. Thus, under optimal water and nutrient conditions, plants are predicted to have a high shoot/root ratio [1,2]. However, when water or mineral nutrient availability decreases, the growth of the shoot—the main site for water loss and mineral nutrients consumption—needs to be reduced in favor of the growth of a larger root system [3,4,5].
This review outlines the antagonistic roles played by cytokinin and auxin in controlling the shoot/root growth ratio and focuses on the link between this antagonism and the adaption to drought stress and nutrient deficiency, two of the main environmental challenges for terrestrial plants.

2. Auxin- and Cytokinin-Dependent Control of the Shoot/Root Growth Ratio

2.1. Auxin and Cytokinin Signaling Pathways

Auxin signaling is essentially an inhibition–release mechanism (Figure 1). The main components of this signaling pathway are the auxin resistant/indole-3-acetic acid inducible (AUX/IAA) proteins, auxin response factor (ARF) proteins, and F-box proteins of the transport inhibitor response 1/auxin signaling F-box (TIR1/AFB) family [6]. F-box proteins are substrate recruiting modules of SCF (SKP1-Cullin 1-F-box protein) E3 ligase complexes and they initiate the degradation of the substrate by the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway [7]. In the auxin signaling pathway, auxin acts as a ligand that promotes binding of the AUX/IAA proteins with SCFTIR1/AFB which leads to the degradation of AUX/IAAs [6]. As a result, ARFs, which are inhibited by the AUX/IAAs, become activated and regulate the expression of primary auxin response genes [8]. The AUX/IAAs genes themselves are auxin-induced [9] and thus serve as negative feedback regulators of the auxin response.
The cytokinin signaling pathway starts with the binding of cytokinin to histidine kinase receptors (CHKs, [10,11,12]), which leads to receptor autophosphorylation (Figure 1). The phosphoryl group is then transferred to histidine phosphotransfer proteins (HPTs), which further relay the phosphoryl group to two groups of response regulators (RRs), the type-B and type-A RRs. The phosphorylated type-B RRs are transcription factors that regulate the expression of primary cytokinin response genes that include genes encoding the type-A RRs, which function as cytokinin response inhibitors and, thus, as negative feedback regulators of the cytokinin response [13,14,15,16,17,18].

2.2. Auxin and Cytokinin Control of the Shoot/Root Growth Ratio in Higher Plants

Pioneering tissue culture experiments have shown that callus can be generated from explants using combined treatment with auxin and cytokinin, and that increasing the auxin to cytokinin ratio promotes root development, whereas decreasing the auxin to cytokinin ratio leads to shoot formation [19]. These experiments, now a cornerstone of basic and applied plant research, were the first to show that auxin is a root growth-promoting hormone, whereas cytokinin is a shoot growth promoter [19].
Subsequent work with mutant and transgenic lines provided unequivocal evidence that auxin and cytokinin have opposite effects on root and shoot growth. Both root and shoot growth are inhibited in Arabidopsis transgenic lines with a strong constitutive auxin or cytokinin response [20,21]. Strong auxin or cytokinin resistance is also associated with severe root and shoot growth inhibition [12,22,23]. However, studies with mutant and transgenic lines that have weaker changes in hormone action, proved that auxin and cytokinin antagonistically regulate the shoot/root growth ratio. For example, transgenic plants with lower cytokinin content have a smaller shoot and a larger root system than the wild type [24,25]. The root phenotype of transgenic plants with lower cytokinin content could be viewed as compensatory (more nutrients may be available for root growth if shoot growth is reduced). This compensatory hypothesis was refuted by analyses of Arabidopsis and tobacco plants in which cytokinin content was reduced only in roots [26]. These transgenic plants have an enlarged root system and a normal wild type-sized shoot, proving that cytokinin directly represses root growth [26]. A shoot-growth promoting effect of cytokinin was also described for a range of grass species that have increased cytokinin content due to elevated expression of STENOFOLIA (STF), which encodes a member of the WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) family of transcription factors that represses the expression of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase genes [27]. Moreover, a study with the aquatic plants Lemna gibba and Spirodela polyrhiza revealed that cytokinin treatment promoted frond (i.e., shoot) expansion and duplication while suppressing root elongation [28]. In addition, research on potato stem single-node cuttings revealed that whereas cytokinin treatments increased, auxin treatments decreased the shoot/root growth ratio [29]. These conclusions reached by analyses of cytokinin-treated plants and transgenic lines with altered cytokinin content were confirmed by cytokinin receptor mutant studies. The Arabidopsis histidine kinase receptor (AHK) double mutant ahk2 ahk3 has smaller shoots and a larger root system [30], and gain-of-function AHK2 or AHK3 plants have enlarged shoots and smaller root systems when compared to wild-type plants [31].
In contrast to cytokinin resistant mutants and transgenic lines with lower cytokinin content, Arabidopsis auxin resistant (axr) mutants have an increased shoot/root biomass ratio (Figure 2). The axr3, axr2, and axr5 mutants, which have decreased auxin sensitivity because of the stabilization of auxin response repressor AUX/IAA proteins [32,33,34], have been ranked based on the strength of their auxin resistance [35]. The strongest axr mutant, axr3-3, has a nearly five-fold increase in shoot/root biomass ratio (Figure 2). However, it could be argued that the overall growth retardation of axr3-3 plants precludes any relevant comparison with the wild type. However, the shoot/root biomass ratio was also increased in the medium-strength auxin insensitive mutant axr2 and the weakest mutant axr5, indicating that a mild decrease in auxin action increases the shoot/root growth ratio without causing the overall dwarfism that characterizes strong auxin resistant mutants such as axr3-3 (Figure 2). Moreover, mutant plants defective in auxin biosynthesis also have an increased shoot/root growth ratio, which confirms that auxin and cytokinin antagonistically regulate the growth rate of aerial and root organs [36].

2.3. Auxin- and Cytokinin-Dependent Control of the Growth Ratio of Shoot/Root Equivalents in Bryophytes

Auxin and cytokinin play key roles in vascular system development and in part, exert their effects on plant growth via vascular transport [37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. However, the antagonistic actions of auxin and cytokinin on the shoot/root growth ratio are operational in the earliest land plants, the non-vascular bryophytes, which suggests that it predates the emergence of the vascular system. Key to the evolution of land plants was the establishment of a program that controls the development of an upward-growing and photosynthesizing shoot-like organ on the one hand, and downward-growing root-like cells on the other [44,45]. Bryophytes have no shoots and roots but have developmentally equivalent organs. In the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha, the thallus is the photosynthesizing part, and it forms gemma cups, multicellular asexual buds, that can be considered the functional equivalents of lateral shoots in higher plants [46]. The flat thallus has dorsal and ventral parts, with the dorsal part responsible for gemma cup formation, while the ventral part produces rhizoids that anchor the liverwort to the soil and take up nutrients and water [47]. Thus, in liverworts, the dorsal part of the thallus and its upward growing structures are the shoot equivalent, and the ventral part of the thallus and the rhizoids are equivalent to roots. Accordingly, an increase in the “shoot/root” growth ratio in M. polymorpha is represented by an increase in the growth rate of the dorsal part of the thallus, combined with an increase in gemma cup initiation and growth, which is a growth pattern that leads to the development of an epinastic (i.e., downward-bending) thallus. A decrease in the “shoot/root” growth ratio, resulting from increased growth of the ventral thallus combined with increased rhizoid formation and growth, will cause hyponastic (i.e., upward-bending) thallus growth.
Functional auxin and cytokinin signaling and biosynthesis exist in both the liverwort M. polymorpha and the moss Physcomitrium patens (previously known as Physcomitrella patens) [48,49,50,51,52,53]. The signaling and biosynthetic pathways in M. polymorpha and P. patens have the same core components as Arabidopsis, albeit encoded by less complex gene families [48,49,50,51,52,53]. Strikingly, hormone treatment studies and analyses of M. polymorpha mutant and transgenic lines with altered hormone content or sensitivity, revealed that auxin and cytokinin affect the growth ratio of the shoot and root equivalents in the same manner as in higher plants: increased cytokinin action promotes gemma cup initiation and causes epinastic thallus growth [46,49,54,55], and increased auxin action leads to the formation of a hyponastic thallus with an increased number of larger rhizoids and a decreased gemma cup initiation rate [46,50,51,56]. In the moss P. patens, the gametophores and rhizoids that develop from the caulonema stage can be considered the equivalents of shoots and roots in higher plants. The gametophore contains photosynthesizing leaves and represents the P. patens reproductive phase, whereas the rhizoids anchor the moss to the soil and take up nutrients and water [53,57]. Similar to higher plants and the liverworts, auxin and cytokinin exert opposite effects on the development of gametophores and rhizoids: auxin treatment suppresses gametophore development and causes the formation of ectopic rhizoids, whereas exogenous cytokinin or a mutational increase in cytokinin content increase gametophore development and inhibit rhizoid growth [58,59,60,61,62,63,64].

3. Auxin and Cytokinin Control of the Responses to Water and Nutrient Availability

The transition from an aquatic to a terrestrial habitat required the evolution of adaptive mechanisms needed to overcome drought stress and mineral nutrient deficiency, two main challenges associated with survival on land [65,66]. Auxin and cytokinin are essential regulators of these adaptive mechanisms, not only because they mold the shoot/root growth to a pattern that is favorable for a terrestrial lifestyle, but also because they regulate physiological processes needed to alleviate and withstand drought stress and mineral nutrient deficiency (Figure 3).

3.1. Drought Stress

Drought is one of the most important environmental stresses and together with oxidative stress, one of the most widely studied stress conditions in plant biology [67]. Drought stress is often described as multidimensional, because it causes extensive changes in plant morphology, physiology, and biochemistry [67]. Many of these changes are regulated by cytokinin and auxin. The most essential cytokinin- and auxin-regulated morphological change is a decrease in the shoot/root growth ratio, which effectively reduces the part of the plant responsible for water loss and increases the part of the plant responsible for water uptake. The most important physiological change is the antagonistic auxin- and cytokinin-dependent control of abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis and ABA responses. ABA, a hormone that regulates specific aspects of plant development (e.g., seed development and germination), is required for drought stress responses and drought tolerance [68,69].

3.1.1. Auxin Promotes Drought Stress Tolerance

Although auxin remains best known as a growth regulatory hormone, its functions in regulating drought stress responses are now well established [70]. Drought stress induces auxin biosynthesis and alters conjugation, catabolism, transport, and response regulation, with an overall effect of increasing auxin action [71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. In addition, auxin treatments or transgenic increases in auxin content, promote drought stress tolerance in a range of plant species [71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79], and loss of function of the auxin biosynthesis pathway causes drought stress hypersensitivity [36,74]. Curiously, even some auxin-synthesizing and auxin-secreting Pseudomonas and Rhizobium strains increase plant tolerance to osmotic stress, a type of stress that also reduces water availability [79,80]. Reciprocal studies, including analyses of drought stress responses in auxin gain- and loss-of-function mutants and transgenic lines, confirmed that auxin positively regulates drought stress tolerance [36,74].
The auxin response pathway is required for auxin-dependent promotion of drought stress tolerance, which suggests that auxin acts as a stress response signaling molecule [81,82,83]. Although a wide range of auxin-dependent responses to drought stress has been described, all the responses ultimately impact water uptake and strengthen the protection against dehydration damage. For example, a decrease in soil water content alters root growth in an auxin-dependent manner, by increasing the initiation and growth of lateral roots and promoting elongation of the primary root [82]. The increased lateral-root-growth response to drought stress was shown to depend on auxin regulation at the biosynthesis, transport, and signaling levels [82]. Moreover, osmotic stress was shown to inhibit leaf expansion growth by increased auxin action via the ARF family of auxin response activators, indicating that auxin also mediates drought stress responses in the shoot [84]. Auxin may also positively impact drought tolerance by limiting stomatal density and controlling stomatal aperture [85].
Current research points to the auxin-inducible AUX/IAA genes as important regulators of auxin-induced drought stress tolerance. Overexpression of AUX/IAA genes was shown to promote drought tolerance in rice and tobacco plants [86,87], and in rice, this was accompanied by increased expression of members of the YUCCA family of auxin biosynthesis genes [86]. AUX/IAAs were also found to promote drought stress tolerance by the regulation of glucosinate and the promotion of stomatal closure [88]. AUX/IAAs are generally auxin response inhibitors [89,90], but their positive role in promoting auxin-mediated drought stress tolerance suggests that they have a more complex role in auxin signaling. Another family of auxin-inducible genes, the Small Auxin-Up RNAs (SAURs), was also implicated in promoting drought (and salt) stress tolerance [91]. SAUR genes are ABA-inducible, and they mediate, at least in part, ABA-induced stomatal closure and seed germination [91]. Thus, the SAUR gene family is viewed as an auxin interaction point with ABA signaling.

3.1.2. Cytokinin Negatively Regulates Drought Stress Tolerance

The link between cytokinin and drought stress tolerance was uncovered over the past two decades [70]. Drought stress represses cytokinin biosynthesis and down-regulates the expression of genes encoding cytokinin signaling components [92,93,94]. Further studies using mutant and transgenic lines revealed that loss of function of components of the cytokinin response pathway, cytokinin resistance or decreased cytokinin content are associated with increased drought stress tolerance, whereas increased cytokinin action causes drought stress hypersensitivity [92,93,95,96,97,98,99], which confirmed that cytokinin negatively affects drought stress tolerance.
A plethora of cytokinin responses that lead to a decrease in drought stress tolerance has been described. Most notably, cytokinin increases water loss by promoting shoot growth and limits water uptake by inhibiting root growth [25,26]. In addition, cytokinin suppresses drought stress tolerance by repressing the expression of ABA-inducible genes [97]. On the other hand, decreased cytokinin content was associated with increased membrane integrity under drought stress conditions and increased ABA sensitivity [93]. While cytokinin treatments have been shown to increase stomatal density in leaves, cytokinin is also known to counteract the effect of ABA on stomatal closure [85,100]. Recently, it was discovered that this cytokinin/ABA crosstalk regulates osmotic stress tolerance by regulating the global control of protein synthesis rates [101]. Transgenic lines that have increased cytokinin action due to increased activity of the Arabidopsis Type-B response Regulator 1 (ARR1) are hypersensitive to osmotic stress [101]. This hypersensitivity is the result of an increase in global protein synthesis, which is—at least partly—caused by the increased expression of cytokinin-inducible RPL4A and RPL4D genes that encode ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4) isoforms A and D [101]. ABA, a known repressor of protein synthesis [102], successfully suppressed the osmotic stress hypersensitivity of ARR1 gain-of-function lines [101].
The salt stress and drought stress responses are closely related, which is not surprising considering that salt stress leads to a reduction in water availability [103,104]. The mitogen-activated protein kinases 3 and 6 (MPK3 and MPK6) play an essential role in the salt stress response of plants, and they promote salt stress tolerance by promoting degradation of Type-B RR cytokinin response activators [105]. It is still to be determined if MPK3- and MPK6-dependent degradation of Type-B RRs plays a role in drought stress response, but if it does, it will bring to light another mechanism of drought stress-dependent suppression of cytokinin signaling.
In summary, the negative role of cytokinin in drought stress tolerance is now well established and supported by cytokinin mutant studies and analyses of transgenic plants with decreased cytokinin content or increased action [92,93,96]. Furthermore, as decreased cytokinin content was also shown to promote drought stress tolerance in the moss P. patens, this negative effect of cytokinin on drought stress tolerance may be conserved throughout the plant kingdom [106]. However, cytokinin treatments or transgenic increases in cytokinin content have also been shown to promote drought stress tolerance [107,108,109,110]. One possible explanation for these contradictory results involves the role played by cytokinin in protecting the photosynthetic machinery under stress conditions [110,111,112]. Cytokinin promotion of drought stress tolerance has been successful when cytokinin biosynthesis was increased in response to drought stress and in senescing leaves of plants expressing a cytokinin biosynthesis transgene from a senescence- or stress-inducible promoter [110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117]. These approaches circumvent the negative drought stress impact of cytokinin on developing leaves, wherein cytokinin promotes water loss by increasing stomatal density and aperture [85,100]. Therefore, the timing of cytokinin treatment seems to be crucial for promoting this type of drought stress tolerance.

3.2. Mineral Nutrient Availability

Since agricultural productivity is inseparably linked to nutrient availability, research on nutrient uptake and responses to nutrient deficiency has been extensive and encompassed a myriad of research directions from soil chemistry to molecular studies of different transporter proteins. The two main limiting nutrients in soils, nitrogen and phosphate, are of particular interest here, as the antagonistic effects of cytokinin and auxin on their uptake and the responses to their decreased availability has been well-documented.

3.2.1. Auxin Positively Regulates Nutrient Uptake

The nitrogen content of soils impacts auxin accumulation and auxin-dependent root growth. Whereas severe nitrogen deficiency inhibits the growth of both the primary and lateral roots [82], mild nitrogen deficiency increases auxin content and signaling, leading to an increase in lateral root formation, lateral root growth, and elongation of the primary root [118,119]. In Arabidopsis, this auxin-dependent promotion of lateral root formation acts in an ion-dependent manner, with ammonium promoting lateral root branching and nitrate promoting lateral root elongation [120,121,122,123,124,125].
Similar to nitrogen, phosphate deficiency triggers lateral root formation by increasing auxin sensitivity and biosynthesis [126,127]. On the other hand, auxin induces the expression of Phosphate Starvation Response 1 (PHR1), a key activator of phosphate starvation response genes, such as genes that encode phosphate transporters [126,127,128,129,130].

3.2.2. Cytokinin Is a Satiation Hormone

Cytokinin generally acts as a negative regulator of mineral nutrient uptake [131,132,133,134]. Nitrogen deficiency was shown to decrease cytokinin content by simultaneously inhibiting cytokinin biosynthesis and promoting cytokinin degradation, thus increasing root growth and mineral nutrient accumulation [135]. The opposite was also shown to hold true: increased nitrogen availability promotes cytokinin accumulation and a concomitant reduction in root growth [136,137,138]. Furthermore, the finding that cytokinin treatments repress genes involved in nitrogen uptake adds to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which cytokinin negatively regulates nitrogen uptake [131]. Cytokinin also suppresses phosphate uptake by repressing the genes involved in the phosphate starvation response, and this negative gene regulation requires the cytokinin response pathway [139,140].
Although cytokinin negatively regulates mineral nutrient uptake, it is important to note that this regulation is only active in response to nutrient excess. As previously stated, nutrient deficiency negatively regulates cytokinin action. Essentially, cytokinin serves as a satiation hormone as it prevents nutrient accumulation to excessive and potentially toxic levels [131].

4. Unidirectional Control of Auxin/Cytokinin Antagonism

The antagonistic auxin/cytokinin regulation of fundamental processes such as the shoot/root growth ratio and water and nutrient uptake implies the existence of a checkpoint(s) or negative feedback loop(s) by which one hormone regulates the biosynthesis, signaling, or transport pathway of the other (Figure 4). Auxin/cytokinin interactions have been investigated in detail in both shoot and root apical meristems, where they play a key role in the initiation of leaves and the priming of lateral roots and thus, determine shoot and root architecture [141,142,143,144,145,146]. Inhibitory auxin/cytokinin interactions have also been described for other phases of plant development (e.g., leaf development, shoot and root elongation, and the branching of shoots and roots). These interactions control the shoot to root growth ratio, and they are predominantly unidirectional, with auxin inhibiting cytokinin, but not the other way around. Auxin-dependent negative control has been described for cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling.

4.1. Auxin Inhibition of Cytokinin Biosynthesis

The inhibitory control of auxin on cytokinin biosynthesis involves the canonical auxin response pathway and is functional in whole plants and in specific organs (e.g., apical meristems and stem internodes) [147,148,149,150,151]. In whole plants, auxin repression predominantly involves inhibition of the isopentenyladenosine-5′-monophosphate-independent pathway of cytokinin biosynthesis [150]. In contrast, cytokinin promotes auxin biosynthesis throughout the plant [152,153,154,155]. For example, high-level expression of a gene encoding the cytokinin biosynthetic enzyme isopentenyltransferase 8 was shown to increase auxin accumulation in the shoot apex and in developing leaves and roots. In contrast, the downregulation of cytokinin content, resulting from either overexpression of a cytokinin oxidase gene or by the loss of function of cytokinin biosynthesis genes, decreased auxin content [152]. Cytokinin-induced auxin synthesis is—at least in part—promoted by cytokinin-dependent upregulation of genes involved in auxin biosynthesis, and it requires the cytokinin response pathway [152,153,154,155]. Considering that auxin is a cytokinin biosynthesis repressor, it is tempting to speculate that cytokinin-induced auxin synthesis serves as a feedback control mechanism that limits cytokinin accumulation and thus cytokinin action.

4.2. Auxin Inhibition of Cytokinin Signaling and Action

It was recently shown that whereas auxin inhibits cytokinin signaling in both shoot and root organs, cytokinin does not negatively affect auxin signaling [35]. Auxin resistance caused by the stabilization of AUX/IAA proteins was associated with increased cytokinin signaling in a mutant strength-dependent manner [35]. Moreover, loss-of-function of the auxin response activator gene ARF7 also combined auxin resistance with increased cytokinin action [35]. In addition to a constitutive increase in cytokinin signaling, auxin resistance was associated with a hypersensitive response to exogenous cytokinin, proving that auxin impacts cytokinin signaling along with cytokinin biosynthesis [35]. In contrast, severe cytokinin resistance caused by the simultaneous loss of function of the ARR1, ARR10, and ARR12 cytokinin response activators did not impact auxin signaling intensity [35], indicating that this antagonistic auxin/cytokinin interaction at the signaling level is also unidirectional. Two recent reports have provided further evidence for this conclusion [147,156]. These studies show that transgenic increase in endogenous auxin and auxin treatments of potato plants, decrease cytokinin content and strongly repress cytokinin signaling genes, whereas cytokinin treatment leads to an ambiguous and sucrose-dependent effect on auxin signaling [147,156].

5. Evolutionary Implications and Future Perspectives

When viewed from an evolutionary perspective, the auxin/cytokinin antagonism and the unidirectional control of cytokinin by auxin allow land plants to flexibly control their shoot/root growth ratio, which is essential for survival in a terrestrial habitat. As auxin and cytokinin also exert antagonistic effects on the growth ratio of shoot and root equivalents in the bryophytes, it will be interesting to determine if the unidirectional auxin inhibition of cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling is also functional in these earliest land plants. In order to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms driving the evolution of land plants, it will also be important to test whether the auxin/cytokinin antagonism controls drought stress and nutrient deficiency responses in bryophytes. If this is the case, it would be of interest to determine whether cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling developed independently from auxin control and were connected to and restricted by auxin during the evolution of land plants, or if they developed co-dependently, for example, as modules of the original auxin response. The Charophyte green algae share their ancestral lineage with land plants [157]. In some Charophytes, auxin and cytokinin have been detected, and orthologues of auxin and cytokinin biosynthesis and response pathway genes have been identified [158,159,160]. It will be of interest to determine whether auxin and cytokinin pathways are linked or function independently in these land plant progenitors.

Author Contributions

J.K. and J.A.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by The Kentucky Tobacco Research and Development Center, and by NIFA HATCH project (1009329).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lynch, J.; Marschner, P.; Rengel, Z. Effect of Internal and External Factors on Root Growth and Development. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Marschner, P., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 331–346. [Google Scholar]
  2. Greenwood, D.J. Quantitative theory and the control of soil fertility. New Phytol. 1983, 94, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gregory, P.; Shepherd, K.; Cooper, P. Effects of fertilizer on root growth and water use of barley in N. Syria. J. Agric. Res. 1984, 103, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chapin, F.S., III. Ecological Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. In Advances in Plant Nutrition; Tinker, B., Laäuchli, A., Eds.; Praeger Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1988; Volume 3, pp. 161–191. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kang, J.G.; Van Iersel, M.W. Nutrient solution concentration affects shoot: Root ratio, leaf area ratio, and growth of subirrigated salvia (Salvia splendens). HortScience 2004, 39, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lavy, M.; Estelle, M. Mechanisms of auxin signaling. Development 2016, 143, 3226–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Smalle, J.; Vierstra, R.D. The ubiquitin 26S proteasome proteolytic pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 555–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Korasick, D.A.; Westfall, C.S.; Lee, S.G.; Nanao, M.H.; Dumas, R.; Hagen, G.; Guilfoyle, T.J.; Jez, J.M.; Strader, L.C. Molecular basis for AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR protein interaction and the control of auxin response repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 5427–5432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Abel, S.; Theologis, A. Early genes and auxin action. Plant Physiol. 1996, 111, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Inoue, T.; Higuchi, M.; Hashimoto, Y.; Seki, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; Shinozaki, K.; Kakimoto, T. Identification of CRE1 as a cytokinin receptor from Arab. Nature 2001, 409, 1060–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Yamada, H.; Suzuki, T.; Terada, K.; Takei, K.; Ishikawa, K.; Miwa, K.; Yamashino, T.; Mizuno, T. The Arabidopsis AHK4 histidine kinase is a cytokinin-binding receptor that transduces cytokinin signals across the membrane. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Higuchi, M.; Pischke, M.S.; Mahonen, A.P.; Miyawaki, K.; Hashimoto, Y.; Seki, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; et al. In planta functions of the Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8821–8826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. To, J.P.; Haberer, G.; Ferreira, F.J.; Deruere, J.; Mason, M.G.; Schaller, G.E.; Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R.; Kieber, J.J. Type-A Arabidopsis response regulators are partially redundant negative regulators of cytokinin signaling. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 658–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hwang, I.; Sheen, J. Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature 2001, 413, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hwang, I.; Sheen, J.; Müller, B. Cytokinin signaling networks. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 353–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hutchison, C.E.; Li, J.; Argueso, C.; Gonzalez, M.; Lee, E.; Lewis, M.W.; Maxwell, B.B.; Perdue, T.D.; Schaller, G.E.; Alonso, J.M.; et al. The Arabidopsis histidine phosphotransfer proteins are redundant positive regulators of cytokinin signaling. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3073–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kieber, J.J.; Schaller, G.E. The perception of cytokinin: A story 50 years in the making. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mason, M.G.; Mathews, D.E.; Argyros, D.A.; Maxwell, B.B.; Kieber, J.J.; Alonso, J.M.; Ecker, J.R.; Schaller, G.E. Multiple type-B response regulators mediate cytokinin signal transduction in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 3007–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Skoog, F.; Miller, C.O. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1957, 11, 118–130. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kurepa, J.; Li, Y.; Perry, S.E.; Smalle, J.A. Ectopic expression of the phosphomimic mutant version of Arabidopsis response regulator 1 promotes a constitutive cytokinin response phenotype. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Li, H.; Cheng, Y.; Murphy, A.; Hagen, G.; Guilfoyle, T.J. Constitutive repression and activation of auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1277–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Dharmasiri, N.; Dharmasiri, S.; Weijers, D.; Lechner, E.; Yamada, M.; Hobbie, L.; Ehrismann, J.S.; Jürgens, G.; Estelle, M. Plant development is regulated by a family of auxin receptor F box proteins. Dev. Cell 2005, 9, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Nishimura, C.; Ohashi, Y.; Sato, S.; Kato, T.; Tabata, S.; Ueguchi, C. Histidine kinase homologs that act as cytokinin receptors possess overlapping functions in the regulation of shoot and root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1365–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Werner, T.; Motyka, V.; Laucou, V.; Smets, R.; Van Onckelen, H.; Schmülling, T. Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and root meristem activity. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2532–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Werner, T.; Motyka, V.; Strnad, M.; Schmülling, T. Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10487–10492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Werner, T.; Nehnevajova, E.; Köllmer, I.; Novák, O.; Strnad, M.; Krämer, U.; Schmülling, T. Root-specific reduction of cytokinin causes enhanced root growth, drought tolerance, and leaf mineral enrichment in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3905–3920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, H.; Niu, L.; Fu, C.; Meng, Y.; Sang, D.; Yin, P.; Wu, J.; Tang, Y.; Lu, T.; Wang, Z.Y.; et al. Overexpression of the WOX gene STENOFOLIA improves biomass yield and sugar release in transgenic grasses and display altered cytokinin homeostasis. PLoS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kurepa, J.; Shull, T.E.; Smalle, J.A. Cytokinin-induced growth in the duckweeds Lemna gibba and Spirodela polyrhiza. Plant Growth Regul. 2018, 86, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aksenova, N.P.; Konstantinova, T.N.; Golyanovskaya, S.A.; Kossmann, J.; Willmitzer, L.; Romanov, G.A. Transformed potato plants as a model for studying the hormonal and carbohydrate regulation of tuberization. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2000, 47, 370–379. [Google Scholar]
  30. Riefler, M.; Novak, O.; Strnad, M.; Schmülling, T. Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor mutants reveal functions in shoot growth, leaf senescence, seed size, germination, root development, and cytokinin metabolism. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 40–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Bartrina, I.; Jensen, H.; Novák, O.; Strnad, M.; Werner, T.; Schmülling, T. Gain-of-function mutants of the cytokinin receptors AHK2 and AHK3 regulate plant organ size, flowering time and plant longevity. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1783–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Nagpal, P.; Walker, L.M.; Young, J.C.; Sonawala, A.; Timpte, C.; Estelle, M.; Reed, J.W. AXR2 encodes a member of the Aux/IAA protein family. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Gray, W.M.; Kepinski, S.; Rouse, D.; Leyser, O.; Estelle, M. Auxin regulates SCF(TIR1)-dependent degradation of AUX/IAA proteins. Nature 2001, 414, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yang, X.; Lee, S.; So, J.H.; Dharmasiri, S.; Dharmasiri, N.; Ge, L.; Jensen, C.; Hangarter, R.; Hobbie, L.; Estelle, M. The IAA1 protein is encoded by AXR5 and is a substrate of SCF(TIR1). Plant J. 2004, 40, 772–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kurepa, J.; Shull, T.E.; Smalle, J.A. Antagonistic activity of auxin and cytokinin in shoot and root organs. Plant Direct 2019, 3, e00121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Woo, Y.M.; Park, H.J.; Su’udi, M.; Yang, J.I.; Park, J.J.; Back, K.; Park, Y.M.; An, G. Constitutively wilted 1, a member of the rice YUCCA gene family, is required for maintaining water homeostasis and an appropriate root to shoot ratio. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kieber, J.J.; Schaller, G.E. Cytokinin signaling in plant development. Development 2018, 145, dev149344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wybouw, B.; De Rybel, B. Cytokinin—A Developing Story. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kang, J.; Lee, Y.; Sakakibara, H.; Martinoia, E. Cytokinin transporters: GO and STOP in signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2017, 22, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, C.J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, K. Cytokinin transporters: Multisite players in cytokinin homeostasis and signal distribution. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Geisler, M.M. A retro-perspective on auxin transport. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 756968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhao, Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Swarup, R.; Bhosale, R. Developmental roles of AUX1/LAX auxin influx carriers in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Jones, V.A.; Dolan, L. The evolution of root hairs and rhizoids. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ligrone, R.; Duckett, J.G.; Renzaglia, K.S. Major transitions in the evolution of early land plants: A bryological perspective. Ann. Bot. 2012, 109, 851–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kato, H.; Yasui, Y.; Ishizaki, K. Gemma cup and gemma development in Marchantia polymorpha. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shimamura, M. Marchantia polymorpha: Taxonomy, phylogeny and morphology of a model system. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 230–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Flores-Sandoval, E.; Eklund, D.M.; Bowman, J.L. A simple auxin transcriptional response system regulates multiple morphogenetic processes in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Aki, S.S.; Mikami, T.; Naramoto, S.; Nishihama, R.; Ishizaki, K.; Kojima, M.; Takebayashi, Y.; Sakakibara, H.; Kyozuka, J.; Kohchi, T.; et al. Cytokinin signaling Is essential for organ formation in Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 1842–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kato, H.; Nishihama, R.; Weijers, D.; Kohchi, T. Evolution of nuclear auxin signaling: Lessons from genetic studies with basal land plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kato, H.; Ishizaki, K.; Kouno, M.; Shirakawa, M.; Bowman, J.L.; Nishihama, R.; Kohchi, T. Auxin-mediated transcriptional system with a minimal set of components is critical for morphogenesis through the life cycle in Marchantia polymorpha. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005084. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rashotte, A.M. The evolution of cytokinin signaling and its role in development before Angiosperms. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 109, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thelander, M.; Landberg, K.; Sundberg, E. Auxin-mediated developmental control in the moss Physcomitrella patens. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aki, S.S.; Nishihama, R.; Kohchi, T.; Umeda, M. Cytokinin signaling coordinates development of diverse organs in Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Signal. Behav. 2019, 14, 1668232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Flores-Sandoval, E.; Dierschke, T.; Fisher, T.J.; Bowman, J.L. Efficient and inducible use of artificial microRNAs in Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Eklund, D.M.; Ishizaki, K.; Flores-Sandoval, E.; Kikuchi, S.; Takebayashi, Y.; Tsukamoto, S.; Hirakawa, Y.; Nonomura, M.; Kato, H.; Kouno, M.; et al. Auxin produced by the indole-3-pyruvic acid pathway regulates development and gemmae dormancy in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 1650–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Moody, L.A. The 2D to 3D growth transition in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 47, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lavy, M.; Prigge, M.J.; Tao, S.; Shain, S.; Kuo, A.; Kirchsteiger, K.; Estelle, M. Constitutive auxin response in Physcomitrella reveals complex interactions between Aux/IAA and ARF proteins. Elife 2016, 5, e13325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Prigge, M.J.; Lavy, M.; Ashton, N.W.; Estelle, M. Physcomitrella patens auxin-resistant mutants affect conserved elements of an auxin-signaling pathway. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20, 1907–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Tao, S.; Estelle, M. Mutational studies of the Aux/IAA proteins in Physcomitrella reveal novel insights into their function. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 1534–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lavy, M.; Prigge, M.J.; Tigyi, K.; Estelle, M. The cyclophilin DIAGEOTROPICA has a conserved role in auxin signaling. Development 2012, 139, 1115–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, T.L.; Beutelmann, P.; Cove, D.J. Cytokinin biosynthesis in mutants of the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Physiol. 1981, 68, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, T.L.; Horgan, R.; Cove, D. Cytokinins from the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Physiol. 1981, 68, 735–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. von Schwartzenberg, K.; Núñez, M.F.; Blaschke, H.; Dobrev, P.I.; Novák, O.; Motyka, V.; Strnad, M. Cytokinins in the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens: Analyses of activity, distribution, and cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase overexpression reveal the role of extracellular cytokinins. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 786–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. de Vries, J.; Archibald, J.M. Plant evolution: Landmarks on the path to terrestrial life. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 1428–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hetherington, J. Evolution of plant rooting systems. In eLS; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, England, 2019; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  67. Salehi-Lisar, S.Y.; Bakhshayeshan-Agdam, H. Drought Stress in Plants: Causes, Consequences, and Tolerance. In Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants, Vol 1: Physiology and Biochemistry; Hossain, M.A., Wani, S.H., Bhattacharjee, S., Burritt, D.J., Tran, L.-S.P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  68. Nakashima, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA signaling in stress-response and seed development. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Vishwakarma, K.; Upadhyay, N.; Kumar, N.; Yadav, G.; Singh, J.; Mishra, R.K.; Kumar, V.; Verma, R.; Upadhyay, R.G.; Pandey, M.; et al. Abscisic acid signaling and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: A review on current knowledge and future prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Salvi, P.; Manna, M.; Kaur, H.; Thakur, T.; Gandass, N.; Bhatt, D.; Muthamilarasan, M. Phytohormone signaling and crosstalk in regulating drought stress response in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1305–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Yan, S.; Wang, R.; Zhao, J.; Li, Y.; Qi, Z.; Sun, Z.; Zhu, Z. The putative auxin efflux carrier OsPIN3t is involved in the drought stress response and drought tolerance. Plant J. 2012, 72, 805–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Saini, K.; AbdElgawad, H.; Markakis, M.N.; Schoenaers, S.; Asard, H.; Prinsen, E.; Beemster, G.T.S.; Vissenberg, K. Perturbation of auxin homeostasis and signaling by PINOID overexpression induces stress responses in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ke, Q.; Wang, Z.; Ji, C.Y.; Jeong, J.C.; Lee, H.S.; Li, H.; Xu, B.; Deng, X.; Kwak, S.S. Transgenic poplar expressing Arabidopsis YUCCA6 exhibits auxin-overproduction phenotypes and increased tolerance to abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 94, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shi, H.; Chen, L.; Ye, T.; Liu, X.; Ding, K.; Chan, Z. Modulation of auxin content in Arabidopsis confers improved drought stress resistance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 82, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, M.; Jung, J.H.; Han, D.Y.; Seo, P.J.; Park, W.J.; Park, C.M. Activation of a flavin monooxygenase gene YUCCA7 enhances drought resistance in Arabidopsis. Planta 2012, 235, 923–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kim, J.I.; Baek, D.; Park, H.C.; Chun, H.J.; Oh, D.H.; Lee, M.K.; Cha, J.Y.; Kim, W.Y.; Kim, M.C.; Chung, W.S.; et al. Overexpression of Arabidopsis YUCCA6 in potato results in high-auxin developmental phenotypes and enhanced resistance to water deficit. Mol. Plant. 2013, 6, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Hassan, M.J.; Li, Z.; Peng, Y. Indole-3-acetic acid improves drought tolerance of white clover via activating auxin, abscisic acid and jasmonic acid related genes and inhibiting senescence genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Chen, J.; Zhong, Y.; Qi, X. LncRNA TCONS_00021861 is functionally associated with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) via competing endogenous RNA regulation. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Defez, R.; Andreozzi, A.; Dickinson, M.; Charlton, A.; Tadini, L.; Pesaresi, P.; Bianco, C. Improved drought stress response in alfalfa plants nodulated by an IAA over-producing Rhizobium strain. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Ahmad, M.; Zahir, Z.A.; Nazli, F.; Akram, F.; Arshad, M.; Khalid, M. Effectiveness of halo-tolerant, auxin producing Pseudomonas and Rhizobium strains to improve osmotic stress tolerance in mung bean (Vigna radiata L.). Braz. J. Microbiol. 2013, 44, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  81. Blakeslee, J.J.; Spatola Rossi, T.; Kriechbaumer, V. Auxin biosynthesis: Spatial regulation and adaptation to stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5041–5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, Y.; von Wirén, N. Integration of nutrient and water availabilities via auxin into the root developmental program. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2021, 65, 102117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mroue, S.; Simeunovic, A.; Robert, H.S. Auxin production as an integrator of environmental cues for developmental growth regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kalve, S.; Sizani, B.L.; Markakis, M.N.; Helsmoortel, C.; Vandeweyer, G.; Laukens, K.; Sommen, M.; Naulaerts, S.; Vissenberg, K.; Prinsen, E.; et al. Osmotic stress inhibits leaf growth of Arabidopsis thaliana by enhancing ARF-mediated auxin responses. New Phytol. 2020, 226, 1766–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, J.; Feng, X.; Xie, J. A simple method for the application of exogenous phytohormones to the grass leaf base protodermal zone to improve grass leaf epidermis development research. Plant Methods 2021, 17, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jung, H.; Lee, D.K.; Choi, Y.D.; Kim, J.K. OsIAA6, a member of the rice Aux/IAA gene family, is involved in drought tolerance and tiller outgrowth. Plant Sci. 2015, 236, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Huang, D.; Wang, Q.; Duan, D.; Dong, Q.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, M.; Jing, G.; Liu, C.; van Nocker, S.; Ma, F.; et al. Overexpression of MdIAA9 confers high tolerance to osmotic stress in transgenic tobacco. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Salehin, M.; Li, B.; Tang, M.; Katz, E.; Song, L.; Ecker, J.R.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Estelle, M. Auxin-sensitive Aux/IAA proteins mediate drought tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating glucosinolate levels. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Strader, L.C.; Zhao, Y. Auxin perception and downstream events. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 33, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Leyser, O. Auxin signaling. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. He, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Lamin-Samu, A.T.; Yang, D.; Yu, X.; Izhar, M.; Jan, I.; Ali, M.; Lu, G. The Arabidopsis SMALL AUXIN UP RNA32 protein regulates ABA-mediated responses to drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 625493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nishiyama, R.; Watanabe, Y.; Leyva-Gonzalez, M.A.; Ha, C.V.; Fujita, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Seki, M.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Herrera-Estrella, L.; et al. Arabidopsis AHP2, AHP3, and AHP5 histidine phosphotransfer proteins function as redundant negative regulators of drought stress response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 4840–4845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Nishiyama, R.; Watanabe, Y.; Fujita, Y.; Le, D.T.; Kojima, M.; Werner, T.; Vankova, R.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Kakimoto, T.; et al. Analysis of cytokinin mutants and regulation of cytokinin metabolic genes reveals important regulatory roles of cytokinins in drought, salt and abscisic acid responses, and abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2169–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Nguyen, K.H.; Ha, C.V.; Nishiyama, R.; Watanabe, Y.; Leyva-Gonzalez, M.A.; Fujita, Y.; Tran, U.T.; Li, W.; Tanaka, M.; Seki, M.; et al. Arabidopsis type B cytokinin response regulators ARR1, ARR10, and ARR12 negatively regulate plant responses to drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 3090–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Mushtaq, N.; Wang, Y.; Fan, J.; Li, Y.; Ding, J. Down-regulation of cytokinin receptor gene SlHK2 improves plant tolerance to drought, heat, and combined stresses in tomato. Plants 2022, 11, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Prerostova, S.; Dobrev, P.I.; Gaudinova, A.; Knirsch, V.; Körber, N.; Pieruschka, R.; Fiorani, F.; Brzobohatý, B.; Černý, M.; Spichal, L.; et al. Cytokinins: Their impact on molecular and growth responses to drought stress and recovery in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Tran, L.S.; Urao, T.; Qin, F.; Maruyama, K.; Kakimoto, T.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Functional analysis of AHK1/ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 20623–20628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Pospisilova, H.; Jiskrova, E.; Vojta, P.; Mrizova, K.; Kokas, F.; Cudejkova, M.M.; Bergougnoux, V.; Plihal, O.; Klimesova, J.; Novak, O.; et al. Transgenic barley overexpressing a cytokinin dehydrogenase gene shows greater tolerance to drought stress. N. Biotechnol. 2016, 33, 692–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Macková, H.; Hronková, M.; Dobrá, J.; Turečková, V.; Novák, O.; Lubovská, Z.; Motyka, V.; Haisel, D.; Hajek, T.; Prášil, I.T.; et al. Enhanced drought and heat stress tolerance of tobacco plants with ectopically enhanced cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase gene expression. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 2805–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Farber, M.; Attia, Z.; Weiss, D. Cytokinin activity increases stomatal density and transpiration rate in tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6351–6362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Karunadasa, S.S.; Kurepa, J.; Shull, T.E.; Smalle, J.A. Cytokinin-induced protein synthesis suppresses growth and osmotic stress tolerance. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Finkelstein, R.R.; Somerville, C.R. Three classes of abscisic acid (ABA)-insensitive mutations of Arabidopsis define genes that control overlapping subsets of ABA responses. Plant Physiol. 1990, 94, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Zhu, J.K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 247–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Yan, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, F.; Xie, C.; Lv, B.; Yu, Z.; Dai, S.; Liu, X.; Xia, G.; Tian, H.; et al. MPK3/6-induced degradation of ARR1/10/12 promotes salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. EMBO Rep. 2021, 22, e52457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hyoung, S.; Cho, S.H.; Chung, J.H.; So, W.M.; Cui, M.H.; Shin, J.S. Cytokinin oxidase PpCKX1 plays regulatory roles in development and enhances dehydration and salt tolerance in Physcomitrella patens. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Reguera, M.; Peleg, Z.; Abdel-Tawab, Y.M.; Tumimbang, E.B.; Delatorre, C.A.; Blumwald, E. Stress-induced cytokinin synthesis increases drought tolerance through the coordinated regulation of carbon and nitrogen assimilation in rice. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1609–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Chang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Dong, H.; Teng, K.; Han, L.; Zhang, X. Effects of cytokinin and nitrogen on drought tolerance of creeping bentgrass. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Zhang, P.W.W.; Zhang, G.; Kaminek, M.; Dobrev, P.; Xu, J.; Gruissem, W. Senescence-inducible expression of isopentenyl transferase extends leaf life, increases drought stress resistance and alters cytokinin metabolism in cassava. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 52, 653–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Rivero, R.M.; Kojima, M.; Gepstein, A.; Sakakibara, H.; Mittler, R.; Gepstein, S.; Blumwald, E. Delayed leaf senescence induces extreme drought tolerance in a flowering plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19631–19636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Rivero, R.M.; Gimeno, J.; Van Deynze, A.; Walia, H.; Blumwald, E. Enhanced cytokinin synthesis in tobacco plants expressing PSARK::IPT prevents the degradation of photosynthetic protein complexes during drought. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51, 1929–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Rivero, R.M.; Shulaev, V.; Blumwald, E. Cytokinin-dependent photorespiration and the protection of photosynthesis during water deficit. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1530–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Kuppu, S.; Mishra, N.; Hu, R.; Sun, L.; Zhu, X.; Shen, G.; Blumwald, E.; Payton, P.; Zhang, H. Water-deficit inducible expression of a cytokinin biosynthetic gene IPT improves drought tolerance in cotton. PLoS One 2013, 8, e64190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Xiao, X.O.; Zeng, Y.M.; Cao, B.H.; Lei, J.J.; Chen, Q.H.; Meng, C.M.; Cheng, Y.J. PSAG12-IPT overexpression in eggplant delays leaf senescence and induces abiotic stress tolerance. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech. 2017, 92, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Merewitz, E.B.; Du, H.; Yu, W.; Liu, Y.; Gianfagna, T.; Huang, B. Elevated cytokinin content in ipt transgenic creeping bentgrass promotes drought tolerance through regulating metabolite accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1315–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Xu, Y.; Burgess, P.; Zhang, X.; Huang, B. Enhancing cytokinin synthesis by overexpressing ipt alleviated drought inhibition of root growth through activating ROS-scavenging systems inAgrostis stolonifera. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 1979–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Qin, H.; Gu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Sun, L.; Kuppu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Burow, M.; Payton, P.; Blumwald, E.; Zhang, H. Regulated expression of an isopentenyltransferase gene (IPT) in peanut significantly improves drought tolerance and increases yield under field conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1904–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Ma, W.; Li, J.; Qu, B.; He, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, B.; Fu, X.; Tong, Y. Auxin biosynthetic gene TAR2 is involved in low nitrogen-mediated reprogramming of root architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2014, 78, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Jia, Z.; Giehl, R.F.H.; von Wirén, N. Local auxin biosynthesis acts downstream of brassinosteroids to trigger root foraging for nitrogen. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Remans, T.; Nacry, P.; Pervent, M.; Filleur, S.; Diatloff, E.; Mounier, E.; Tillard, P.; Forde, B.G.; Gojon, A. The Arabidopsis NRT1.1 transporter participates in the signaling pathway triggering root colonization of nitrate-rich patches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19206–19211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Zhang, H.; Forde, B.G. An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science 1998, 279, 407–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lima, J.E.; Kojima, S.; Takahashi, H.; von Wirén, N. Ammonium triggers lateral root branching in Arabidopsis in an AMMONIUM TRANSPORTER1;3-dependent manner. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3621–3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Meier, M.; Liu, Y.; Lay-Pruitt, K.S.; Takahashi, H.; von Wirén, N. Auxin-mediated root branching is determined by the form of available nitrogen. Nat. Plants 2020, 6, 1136–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Krouk, G.; Lacombe, B.; Bielach, A.; Perrine-Walker, F.; Malinska, K.; Mounier, E.; Hoyerova, K.; Tillard, P.; Leon, S.; Ljung, K.; et al. Nitrate-regulated auxin transport by NRT1.1 defines a mechanism for nutrient sensing in plants. Dev. Cell 2010, 18, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mounier, E.; Pervent, M.; Ljung, K.; Gojon, A.; Nacry, P. Auxin-mediated nitrate signalling by NRT1.1 participates in the adaptive response of Arabidopsis root architecture to the spatial heterogeneity of nitrate availability. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Huang, K.L.; Ma, G.J.; Zhang, M.L.; Xiong, H.; Wu, H.; Zhao, C.Z.; Liu, C.S.; Jia, H.X.; Chen, L.; Kjorven, J.O.; et al. The ARF7 and ARF19 transcription factors positively regulate PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE1 in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 413–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Pérez-Torres, C.A.; López-Bucio, J.; Cruz-Ramírez, A.; Ibarra-Laclette, E.; Dharmasiri, S.; Estelle, M.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Phosphate availability alters lateral root development in Arabidopsis by modulating auxin sensitivity via a mechanism involving the TIR1 auxin receptor. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 3258–3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Bustos, R.; Castrillo, G.; Linhares, F.; Puga, M.I.; Rubio, V.; Pérez-Pérez, J.; Solano, R.; Leyva, A.; Paz-Ares, J. A central regulatory system largely controls transcriptional activation and repression responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Castrillo, G.; Teixeira, P.J.; Paredes, S.H.; Law, T.F.; de Lorenzo, L.; Feltcher, M.E.; Finkel, O.M.; Breakfield, N.W.; Mieczkowski, P.; Jones, C.D.; et al. Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature 2017, 543, 513–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Crombez, H.; Motte, H.; Beeckman, T. Tackling plant phosphate starvation by the roots. Dev. Cell 2019, 48, 599–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Kiba, T.; Kudo, T.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H. Hormonal control of nitrogen acquisition: Roles of auxin, abscisic acid, and cytokinin. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 1399–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Maruyama-Nakashita, A.; Nakamura, Y.; Yamaya, T.; Takahashi, H. A novel regulatory pathway of sulfate uptake in Arabidopsis roots: Implication of CRE1/WOL/AHK4-mediated cytokinin-dependent regulation. Plant J. 2004, 38, 779–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Martin, A.C.; del Pozo, J.C.; Iglesias, J.; Rubio, V.; Solano, R.; de La Peña, A.; Leyva, A.; Paz-Ares, J. Influence of cytokinins on the expression of phosphate starvation responsive genes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2000, 24, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sakakibara, H. Cytokinins: Activity, biosynthesis, and translocation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 431–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Wang, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Zou, X.; Li, F.; Zhang, J.; Kang, Z.; Li, X.; Yin, C.; Lin, Y. Nitrogen deficiency-induced decrease in cytokinins content promotes rice seminal root growth by promoting root meristem cell proliferation and cell elongation. Cells 2020, 9, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Miyawaki, K.; Matsumoto-Kitano, M.; Kakimoto, T. Expression of cytokinin biosynthetic isopentenyltransferase genes in Arabidopsis: Tissue specificity and regulation by auxin, cytokinin, and nitrate. Plant J. 2004, 37, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Takei, K.; Ueda, N.; Aoki, K.; Kuromori, T.; Hirayama, T.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaya, T.; Sakakibara, H. AtIPT3 is a key determinant of nitrate-dependent cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 1053–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Takei, K.; Sakakibara, H.; Taniguchi, M.; Sugiyama, T. Nitrogen-dependent accumulation of cytokinins in root and the translocation to leaf: Implication of cytokinin species that induces gene expression of maize response regulator. Plant Cell Physiol. 2001, 42, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Shen, C.; Yue, R.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Sun, T.; Tie, S.; Wang, H. OsARF16 is involved in cytokinin-mediated inhibition of phosphate transport and phosphate signaling in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; Martin, A.C.; Solano, R.; Rubio, V.; Leyva, A.; Paz-Ares, J. Mutations at CRE1 impair cytokinin-induced repression of phosphate starvation responses in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002, 32, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Besnard, F.; Rozier, F.; Vernoux, T. The AHP6 cytokinin signaling inhibitor mediates an auxin-cytokinin crosstalk that regulates the timing of organ initiation at the shoot apical meristem. Plant Signal. Behav. 2014, 9, e28788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Bishopp, A.; Help, H.; El-Showk, S.; Weijers, D.; Scheres, B.; Friml, J.; Benková, E.; Mähönen, A.P.; Helariutta, Y. A mutually inhibitory interaction between auxin and cytokinin specifies vascular pattern in roots. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21, 917–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Chickarmane, V.S.; Gordon, S.P.; Tarr, P.T.; Heisler, M.G.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Cytokinin signaling as a positional cue for patterning the apical-basal axis of the growing Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 4002–4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Dello Ioio, R.; Nakamura, K.; Moubayidin, L.; Perilli, S.; Taniguchi, M.; Morita, M.T.; Aoyama, T.; Costantino, P.; Sabatini, S. A genetic framework for the control of cell division and differentiation in the root meristem. Science 2008, 322, 1380–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Truskina, J.; Vernoux, T. The growth of a stable stationary structure: Coordinating cell behavior and patterning at the shoot apical meristem. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 41, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jing, H.; Strader, L. Interplay of auxin and cytokinin in lateral root development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Kolachevskaya, O.O.; Sergeeva, L.I.; Floková, K.; Getman, I.A.; Lomin, S.N.; Alekseeva, V.V.; Rukavtsova, E.B.; Buryanov, Y.I.; Romanov, G.A. Auxin synthesis gene tms1 driven by tuber-specific promoter alters hormonal status of transgenic potato plants and their responses to exogenous phytohormones. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 419–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhang, K.; Wang, R.; Zi, H.; Li, Y.; Cao, X.; Li, D.; Guo, L.; Tong, J.; Pan, Y.; Jiao, Y.; et al. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 regulates floral meristem determinacy by repressing cytokinin biosynthesis and signaling. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 324–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Tanaka, M.; Takei, K.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H.; Mori, H. Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance. Plant J. 2006, 45, 1028–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Nordström, A.; Tarkowski, P.; Tarkowska, D.; Norbaek, R.; Astot, C.; Dolezal, K.; Sandberg, G. Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: A factor of potential importance for auxin-cytokinin-regulated development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8039–8044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Cheng, Z.J.; Wang, L.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, C.; Su, Y.H.; Li, W.; Sun, T.T.; Zhao, X.Y.; Li, X.G.; et al. Pattern of auxin and cytokinin responses for shoot meristem induction results from the regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis by AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 240–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Jones, B.; Gunnerås, S.A.; Petersson, S.V.; Tarkowski, P.; Graham, N.; May, S.; Dolezal, K.; Sandberg, G.; Ljung, K. Cytokinin regulation of auxin synthesis in Arabidopsis involves a homeostatic feedback loop regulated via auxin and cytokinin signal transduction. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 2956–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Di, D.W.; Wu, L.; Zhang, L.; An, C.W.; Zhang, T.Z.; Luo, P.; Gao, H.H.; Kriechbaumer, V.; Guo, G.Q. Functional roles of Arabidopsis CKRC2/YUCCA8 gene and the involvement of PIF4 in the regulation of auxin biosynthesis by cytokinin. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Moubayidin, L.; Di Mambro, R.; Sozzani, R.; Pacifici, E.; Salvi, E.; Terpstra, I.; Bao, D.; van Dijken, A.; Dello Ioio, R.; Perilli, S.; et al. Spatial coordination between stem cell activity and cell differentiation in the root meristem. Dev. Cell 2013, 26, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Müller, C.J.; Larsson, E.; Spíchal, L.; Sundberg, E. Cytokinin-auxin crosstalk in the gynoecial primordium ensures correct domain patterning. Plant Physiol. 2017, 175, 1144–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Kolachevskaya, O.O.; Myakushina, Y.A.; Getman, I.A.; Lomin, S.N.; Deyneko, I.V.; Deigraf, S.V.; Romanov, G.A. Hormonal regulation and crosstalk of auxin/cytokinin signaling pathways in potatoes in vitro and in relation to vegetation or tuberization stages. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, e28788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Domozych, D.S.; Popper, Z.A.; Sorensen, I. Charophytes: Evolutionary Giants and Emerging Model Organisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, S.S.; Han, G.Z. Insights into the origin and evolution of the plant hormone signaling machinery. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 872–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Johri, M.M. Hormonal regulation in green plant lineage families. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2008, 14, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Morffy, N.; Strader, L.C. Old Town Roads: Routes of auxin biosynthesis across kingdoms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2020, 55, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 01933 g001 550
Figure 1. Simplified schemes of the auxin and cytokinin response pathways. Abbreviations: AUX/IAAs, auxin/indole-3-acetic acid regulators; ARFs, auxin response factors; CHKs, cytokinin histidine kinase receptors; HPTs, histidine phosphotransfer proteins; RRBs, type-B response regulators; RRAs, type-A response regulators.
Figure 1. Simplified schemes of the auxin and cytokinin response pathways. Abbreviations: AUX/IAAs, auxin/indole-3-acetic acid regulators; ARFs, auxin response factors; CHKs, cytokinin histidine kinase receptors; HPTs, histidine phosphotransfer proteins; RRBs, type-B response regulators; RRAs, type-A response regulators.
Ijms 23 01933 g001
Ijms 23 01933 g002 550
Figure 2. Increased shoot/root growth ratio in Arabidopsis auxin resistant mutants. Nineteen-day-old Col-0 wild type, axr5-1, axr2-1, and axr3-3 plants, grown on vertical plates containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium, were dissected, and the fresh weights of shoots and roots were measured. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ≥ 12 pools of 8 plants each). The significance of the difference between the wild type and the mutants is noted (****, p < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test) Kurepa et al., unpublished.
Figure 2. Increased shoot/root growth ratio in Arabidopsis auxin resistant mutants. Nineteen-day-old Col-0 wild type, axr5-1, axr2-1, and axr3-3 plants, grown on vertical plates containing half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium, were dissected, and the fresh weights of shoots and roots were measured. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n ≥ 12 pools of 8 plants each). The significance of the difference between the wild type and the mutants is noted (****, p < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test) Kurepa et al., unpublished.
Ijms 23 01933 g002
Ijms 23 01933 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of nutrient or water availability and effects of the auxin/cytokinin ratio on the shoot/root growth ratio.
Figure 3. Effects of nutrient or water availability and effects of the auxin/cytokinin ratio on the shoot/root growth ratio.
Ijms 23 01933 g003
Ijms 23 01933 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic summary of the antagonistic cytokinin/auxin control of the shoot/root ratio in relation to water deficit and nutrient deficiency.
Figure 4. Schematic summary of the antagonistic cytokinin/auxin control of the shoot/root ratio in relation to water deficit and nutrient deficiency.
Ijms 23 01933 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurepa, J.; Smalle, J.A. Auxin/Cytokinin Antagonistic Control of the Shoot/Root Growth Ratio and Its Relevance for Adaptation to Drought and Nutrient Deficiency Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041933

AMA Style

Kurepa J, Smalle JA. Auxin/Cytokinin Antagonistic Control of the Shoot/Root Growth Ratio and Its Relevance for Adaptation to Drought and Nutrient Deficiency Stresses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(4):1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurepa, Jasmina, and Jan A. Smalle. 2022. "Auxin/Cytokinin Antagonistic Control of the Shoot/Root Growth Ratio and Its Relevance for Adaptation to Drought and Nutrient Deficiency Stresses" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 4: 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop