Next Article in Journal
OX40–OX40L Axis in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: Pathogenic, Prognostic, and Potential Therapeutic Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Past, Present and Future Perspectives of Forensic Genetics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydroxytyrosyl Eicosapentaenoate as a Potential Antioxidant for Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Improved Synthesis and Comparative Evaluation with Other Natural Antioxidants

1
Department of Metabolism and Nutrition (DMN), Institute of Food Science, Food Technology, and Nutrition (ICTAN), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), C/José Antonio Novais 6, 28040 Madrid, Spain
2
Fat Institute, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Universidad Pablo d Olavide, Edificio 46 Ctra. De Utrera Km 1, 41013 Seville, Spain
3
CIBER de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), 28029 Madrid, Spain
4
Department of Organic and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, 41012 Sevilla, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2025, 15(5), 714; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15050714
Submission received: 1 April 2025 / Revised: 9 May 2025 / Accepted: 10 May 2025 / Published: 13 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Lipids)

Abstract

Hydroxytyrosol (HT), the primary phenolic compound in virgin olive oil, has notable cardiovascular benefits, particularly in preventing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation. However, its hydrophilicity limits its solubility and integration into lipid-based formulations. This study aimed to enhance its lipophilicity by synthesizing hydroxytyrosyl eicosapentaenoate (HT-EPA), a derivative of HT and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), using a one-step enzymatic catalysis with lipase B from Candida antarctica (CALB). The reaction, performed as a suspension of HT in ethyl eicosapentaenoate (Et-EPA) (1:9 molar ratio) under vacuum, achieved higher yields and shorter reaction times than previously reported, with a purity exceeding 98%, confirmed by 1H-NMR. For the first time, the antioxidant capacity of HT-EPA in comparison with other natural antioxidants was assessed using the FRAP assay, while its oxidative stability in an omega-3-rich oil matrix was evaluated via the Rancimat method. HT-EPA and hydroxytyrosyl acetate (HT-Ac) displayed antioxidant activity comparable to HT but significantly higher than α-tocopherol, a common food antioxidant. Given the scarcity of effective lipid-soluble antioxidants, HT-EPA represents a promising candidate for omega-3 nutraceuticals, offering enhanced stability and potential health benefits. This study provides a simple, efficient, and scalable strategy for developing functional lipid-based formulations with cardioprotective potential by improving HT solubility while preserving its antioxidant properties.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately one-third of all deaths worldwide [1]. Among the many contributing factors, elevated triglycerides (TGs) have emerged as a critical marker of increased cardiovascular risk, particularly in patients with established comorbidities [2,3]. Despite advancements in standard therapies targeting cholesterol and blood pressure, residual cardiovascular risk remains high in many patients [4,5], reinforcing the urgent need for adjunctive interventions capable of effectively mitigating this burden.
One promising avenue for reducing TG levels lies in nutritional interventions, particularly through the use of omega-3 fatty acids (O3FAs), especially eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Among these, EPA is considered more potent in its therapeutic effects [6] and has demonstrated significant lipid-lowering effects in numerous clinical studies [7,8,9,10]. Despite their efficacy, the therapeutic potential of O3FAs is often limited by their inherent instability and susceptibility to oxidation, particularly during formulation and storage [11,12]. Oxidized O3FAs not only exhibit reduced therapeutic value but may also contribute to oxidative stress, thereby counteracting their expected cardiovascular benefits [13].
To address this challenge, incorporating antioxidants as stabilizing agents has gained significant attention [14,15]. Hydroxytyrosol (HT) is a phenolic compound found in virgin olive oil (VOO) and extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), mainly as secoiridoid derivatives (the aldehydic form of oleuropein aglycone and the dialdehydic form of decarboxymethyl oleuropein aglycone). It is also present in smaller amounts as the free form and as the acylated derivative hydroxytyrosol acetate (HT-Ac) [16,17]. HT stands out as a potent antioxidant with well-documented cardiovascular benefits [18,19]. Accumulating evidence from both animal and human studies supports the cardiometabolic benefits of olive-derived phenolic compounds, particularly on lipid profiles and insulin resistance, highlighting their potential as adjuvant agents in the management of metabolic syndrome [20,21,22]. The ability of HT to neutralize oxidative stress suggests a potential role in stabilizing lipid molecules to enhance the efficacy and stability of O3FA-based therapies, apart from its additional bioactivity that could represent a double benefit.
However, HT incorporation into O3FA-based nutraceuticals may present challenges due to its hydrophilic nature, which limits its solubility in lipid-based matrices. One promising strategy to overcome this limitation is the transformation of HT into lipidic derivatives, such as HT esters [23]. This reaction not only enhances the solubility of HT in oily formulations but could also potentiate its antioxidant effects, contributing to the reduction of oxidative stress and improving the lipid profile of the final O3FA products.
This study aimed to optimize the synthesis of HT-EPA (3, see Scheme 1), a promising lipophilic antioxidant, for the stabilization of ethyl eicosapentaenoate (Et-EPA) and the development of a new food-grade antioxidant formulation. To this end, this study evaluated both its antioxidant activity and the supplement’s oxidative stability in comparison with HT (1) and another natural lipophilic compound (HT-Ac, 2). Although naturally present in EVOO, HT-Ac was also synthesized in this study for further investigation due to its lipophilic and potential antioxidant characteristics. They were all compared with α-tocopherol, a commonly used antioxidant in the formulation of O3FAs-based nutraceuticals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

HT and Et-EPA were provided by Indagoo (Cymit Química, Barcelona, Spain). Immobilized Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB, Novozym-435®) and 2-methyl tetrahydrofuran (MeTHF) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain), as well as α-tocopherol, (±)-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) and 2,4,6-Tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ). All other chemicals used as solvents were provided by Cosela (Seville, Spain).
NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE NEO 500 spectrometer operating at 500.13 MHz (1H) and 125.75 MHz (13C). Samples were dissolved (10 mg/mL) in hexadeuterated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO-d6), and spectra were recorded at 303 K. Chemical shifts are given in parts per million (ppm) with the residual solvent signals (2.49 ppm for 1H and 39.5 ppm for 13C) as references, whereas coupling constants are given in Hz. 2D-NMR experiments (COSY, HSQC and HMBC) were performed to assign all the signals in the NMR spectra. High-resolution mass spectra were recorded on an Orbitrap Elite (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA), a hybrid ion trap–orbitrap mass spectrometer with a resolution higher than 240,000, with ESI, HESI, APCI and nanoESI ionization sources.

2.2. Synthetic Procedures

2.2.1. Synthesis of Hydroxytyrosyl Acetate (HT-Ac, 2)

To a solution of hydroxytyrosol (4 mmol) in ethyl acetate (AcOEt, 60 mL) was added p-toluenesulfonic acid (p-TsOH, 200 mg), and the mixture was heated to reflux for 4 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using a hexane/tert-butyl methyl ether (TBME) (1:1) eluent system, until the complete conversion of the starting material to HT-Ac (2). The resulting suspension was washed with a NaHCO3-saturated solution, dried with Na2SO4, and purified by column chromatography to yield pure 2 as a white solid (86% yield). All spectroscopic data were in good accordance with those previously reported [24].

2.2.2. Synthesis of Hydroxytyrosyl Eicosapentaenoate (HT-EPA, 3)

A mixture of HT (1, 13 mmol), 5 mL of MeTHF, Et-EPA (120 mmol), and 2 g of Novozyme-435 was stirred under vacuum at 48 °C for 3 h. Then, the resulting suspension was diluted with hexane, filtered through celite to remove the enzyme, and concentrated under reduced pressure. Finally, the oily crude was purified using a flash chromatography column over silica gel using hexane/ethyl acetate (9:1) as eluent. Compound 3 was obtained as a colorless oil in 59% of yield: 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, 303 K), δ (ppm) 8.76 (bs, 1H, OH-6), 8.70 (bs, 1H, OH-5), 6.61 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, H-7), 6.58 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H, H-4), 6.43 (dd, J = 2.0 and 8.0 Hz, 1H, H-8), 5.32 (m, 10H, H-5’, H-6’, H-8’, H-9’, H-11’, H-12’, H-14’, H-15’, H-17’, and H-18’), 4.09 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, H-1), 2.79 (t, J = 5.1 Hz, 4H, H-7’ and H-16’), 2.75 (m, 4H, H-10’ and H-13’), 2.66 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H, H-2), 2.24 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, H-2’), 2.00 (m, 4H, H-4’ and H-19’), 1.54 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, H-3’), 0.89 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H, H-20’); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6, 303 K), δ (ppm) 172.8 (C-1’), 145.15 (C-5), 143.80 (C-6), 131.65 (C-18’), 129.07 (C-5’), 128.61 (C-15’), 128.46 (C-3), 128.20–127.77 (C-6’, C-8’, C-9’, C-11’, C12’, and C-14’), 127.0 (C-17’), 119.51 (C-8), 116.21 (C-4), 115.55 (C-7), 64.74 (C-1), 33.88 (C-2), 33.00 (C-2’), 26.04 (C-4’), 25.30–25.20 (C-7’, C-10’, C-13’, and C-16’), 24.22 (C-3’), 20.12 (C-19’), and 14.18 (C-20’). HRMS, calc. 461.2662 for C28H38O4Na [M + Na]+, found 461.2655 (−1.6 ppm).

2.3. Antioxidant Activity Determinations

2.3.1. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP assay was carried out according to the procedure described by Benzie and Strain [25], with adaptations for a 96-well microplate format. The antioxidant potential of the synthesized compounds (2 and 3), along with HT (1) and α-tocopherol, was assessed based on their ability to reduce the TPTZ-Fe (III) complex to its stable ferrous form (TPTZ-Fe (II) complex). Briefly, 60 μL of freshly prepared FRAP reagent, prewarmed at 37 °C, was dispensed into each well of a clear 96-well plate containing 10 μL of the test sample (dissolved in methanol or aqueous-organic mixture), 30 μL of distilled water, and 200 μL of 0.3 M acetate buffer (pH 3.6). The total reaction volume per well was 300 μL, resulting in a final sample dilution of approximately 1:30. The FRAP reagent consisted of 2.5 mL of 10 mmol/L TPTZ in 40 mmol/L HCl, 2.5 mL of 20 mmol/L FeCl₃·6H₂O, and 7.5 mL of acetate buffer. Absorbance at 595 nm was recorded every 90 s for 30 min using a BioTek microplate reader (Gen5 3.11 software), with temperature maintained at 37 °C. Antioxidant capacity was calculated from the absorbance at 30 min using Trolox standard solutions (100–800 μmol/L in methanol), and the FRAP values were expressed as millimolar Trolox equivalent (mM TE). Each value represents the average of three or six determinations.

2.3.2. ABTS Assay

The free radical scavenging capacity was measured according to Re et al.’s (1999) ABTS decoloration method [26], with some modifications for microplate format using a BioTek microplate reader (Gen5 software) equipped for automated dispensing. The method is based on the ability of different components to scavenge the ABTS radical cation (ABTS+·) compared to a standard antioxidant (Trolox). The ABTS+ radical was generated by reacting 7 mM ABTS with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate in the dark for 12–16 h, and diluted in PBS to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 730 nm. In clear 96-well plates, 10 µL of the sample and 230 µL of solvent were added, followed by 60 µL of the ABTS+·solution using the microplate reader. Plates were shaken for 15 s, and absorbance was recorded at 658 nm every 90 s for 30 min at 37 °C. Antioxidant capacity was determined from the area under the curve (AUC0–30 min) using Trolox standard curves (50–600 µM). Results were expressed in mM TE (millimolar Trolox equivalent). All analyses were run in triplicate.

2.3.3. Rancimat® Test

The oxidative stability was evaluated using an accelerated automated test with Rancimat equipment (Model 743, Metrohm Co., Basel, Switzerland) subjecting the samples to the action of oxygen at 80 ± 1 °C because at 100 °C they were altered in a very short time (<1 h), which made it impossible to determine the differences between the treatments.
Aliquots of the glyceridic matrix (Et-EPA) were purified according to the ‘free solvent’ procedure. Briefly, 200 g of oil was poured into a glass chromatography column (45 × 3 cm id) packed with 100 g of alumina activated at 200 °C for 3 h. The purified matrices, free of antioxidants, were stored at −18 °C under nitrogen.
An aliquot of 2.5 g of the purified Et-EPA was supplemented with methanolic solutions of hydroxytyrosol esters (2 and 3, see Scheme 1), HT (1), and α-tocopherol at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 20 mM (the latter selected to achieve a steady state of oxidative stability).
Then, 0.5 mL of acetone was added to Rancimat vessels, and the mixtures were homogenized. The vessels were then sealed with the measuring heads, placed into the Rancimat apparatus at room temperature, and heated under an air flow rate of 4 L/h. Once the temperature reached 80 °C, the vessel outlets were connected to the conductivity cells, the air flow was increased to 15 L/h, and time measurement was initiated.
The time required to observe a sharp increase in conductivity is defined as the induction time (IT) and is expressed in hours, and represents the stability of the lipid matrix. IT was determined by the intersection of the baseline with the tangent to the conductivity curve. All measurements were performed in duplicate.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

FRAP and ABTS data were subjected to a one-way ANOVA to assess differences in antioxidant activity among the tested compounds. Before the analysis, assumptions regarding independence, normality, homogeneity of variances, and the absence of influential observations were evaluated using graphical and statistical methods, with no major violations detected. Post hoc comparisons were conducted using the Tukey–Kramer procedure, which is suitable for unbalanced designs, to explore pairwise differences and group compounds into homogeneous subsets based on mean similarity.
Rancimat statistical analysis was carried out by fitting a two-parameter model, followed by pairwise comparisons of the maximum oxidation rates using Welch’s t-test in R Studio (4.4.3 version). Mean differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Preparation and Characterization of HT Esters

Hydroxytyrosyl acetate (HT-Ac, 2) was prepared by a transesterification reaction between HT (1) and ethyl acetate under acidic catalytic conditions (Scheme 1), as previously described [23].
On the other hand, HT-EPA was synthesized via transesterification of the ethyl ester of EPA (Et-EPA) with HT (1), using immobilized CALB (Novozyme-435) as the catalyst (Scheme 1), by a modified procedure from that previously reported [27]. To enhance the solubility of HT in the lipophilic Et-EPA, MeTHF, an eco-friendly solvent [28], was initially added, which was rapidly evaporated at the beginning of the reaction. The esterification was carried out under a vacuum to eliminate the ethanol that had formed, which shifts the equilibrium towards the formation of the desired product. A series of experiments were conducted for the optimization of the yield, varying the molar ratios of the substrates (1:23 to 1:9), the amount of catalyst, and reaction time. The optimal conditions were selected based on maximum product yield (59%) and reaction time (3 h). After filtering the enzyme, the excess of Et-EPA was effectively eliminated by flash chromatography, and the structure of compound 3 was confirmed by spectroscopic methods. Its 1H NMR spectrum is shown in Figure 1, in comparison with those for HT (1) and HT-Ac (2).
The figure shows the 1H-NMR spectra of HT, HT-Ac, and HT-EPA (1,2,3, respectively), evidencing the structural modifications. HT (1) shows characteristic aromatic proton signals between 6.5 and 7.5 ppm, an alcoholic hydroxyl group (-OH) signal around 4.5 ppm, and two broad signals corresponding to phenolic hydroxyl groups in the 8–9 ppm region. In HT-Ac (2), some changes in signals allowed confirming acetylation: (i) the disappearance of the alcoholic -OH signal, (ii) a new signal at 2.0 ppm corresponding to the methyl protons of the acetyl group, (iii) the triplet corresponding to the CH2 protons in position 1 of HT (spectrum a), shifts 0.6 ppm to downfield in HT-Ac (spectrum b), and (iv), the aromatic region remaining significantly unchanged. HT-EPA (3) retains the aromatic signals and incorporates signals from olefinic protons of the EPA chain between 5.0 and 6.5 ppm and new signals between 0.8 and 2.5 ppm corresponding to aliphatic protons of the EPA chain, confirming esterification. These changes, including the 0.6 ppm downfield shift of protons in position 1, as in compound 2, confirm the successful synthesis of the hydroxytyrosyl ester 3. All these 1H signals, as well as those for 13C, were unambiguously assigned based on 2D NMR experiments (spectra not shown).

3.2. Antioxidant Activity Assays

3.2.1. FRAP Assay

The reducing capacity of HT-EPA (3) was determined by using the FRAP assay and compared to its precursor HT (1), another natural and lipophilic compound, HT-Ac (2), and α-tocopherol, as a reference compound. The results, summarized in Table 1, showed no significant differences in antioxidant activity between HT (1) and HT-Ac (2). In contrast, HT-EPA (3) displayed a statistically significant reduction compared to HT (1), although the absolute difference was small. All hydroxytyrosol-based compounds exhibited significantly higher reducing power than the widely used antioxidant in the agro-food industry, α-tocopherol. FRAP values are expressed as millimolar Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC, mM).

3.2.2. ABTS Assay

The radical scavenging activities of the tested compounds showed a similar trend to the reducing activity. In this sense, HT-Ac and HT-EPA exhibited similar antioxidant activity, which was significantly lower than HT activity. Again, compounds 13 presented significantly higher antioxidant capacity than α-tocopherol.

3.2.3. Rancimat Test

The antioxidant efficacy of the newly synthesized compounds was assessed in a lipid matrix composed of antioxidant-free Et-EPA oil using the accelerated Rancimat method at 80 °C. The IT increased proportionally with antioxidant concentration up to 20 mM, indicating a dose-dependent stabilization effect. Beyond this concentration, no further significant improvements in oxidative stability were observed, suggesting a saturation threshold. Figure 2 illustrates the IT values for purified lipid matrices supplemented with increasing concentrations of HT (1), hydroxytyrosyl esters (2, 3), and α-tocopherol. Both ester derivatives exhibited comparable antioxidant activity per millimole, with IT values slightly lower than those observed in matrices containing free HT (1) at lower concentrations. However, they demonstrated significantly greater oxidative protection in the lipid matrix compared to α-tocopherol, reinforcing their potential as effective stabilizers for omega-3 formulations.

4. Discussion

HT derivatives have been widely studied for their potential application as novel food antioxidants [29,30]. The growing demand for fat-soluble antioxidants in the agro-food industry has led to the development of lipophilic HT esters as a viable alternative to expand the currently limited range of available antioxidants [23,31,32,33]. Currently, the market relies primarily on α-tocopherol, which exhibits only moderate antioxidant activity [34,35,36], and synthetic butylated hydrotoluene (BHT), whose safety profile remains controversial due to the limited number of human studies assessing its possible adverse effects [37,38,39]. In this context, enhancing HT lipophilicity could not only improve its bioavailability in nutraceutical applications [40] but also contribute to the antioxidant stability of other ingredients within the formulation, ultimately extending the product’s overall efficacy.
This ability suggests a potential role in stabilizing O3FA-based nutraceuticals [41,42,43], such as oils rich in EPA, which is particularly interesting because of its cardioprotective properties; however, it is highly prone to oxidation due to its polyunsaturated long-chain structure. Thus, HT esterification with EPA may provide a viable strategy for effectively incorporating HT into a lipid matrix while preventing EPA from rapid oxidation. However, challenges remain regarding the yield in the synthesis of O3FA esters. In this study, we aimed to address these challenges by optimizing the synthesis of HT eicosapentaenoate (HT-EPA) and evaluating its antioxidant capacity and oxidative stability in comparison with HT acetate (HT-Ac) and its precursor, HT.
The enzyme-catalyzed esterification has been demonstrated to be a potentially highly efficient method [44] since it provides a high selectivity with only minor limitations, such as temperature sensitivity. This drawback can be mitigated by immobilizing the enzyme in acrylic resin, although economic factors remain a concern. Bulky omega-3 fatty acids continue to pose a challenge to reaction efficiency, as previously discussed. Under our optimized conditions using immobilized lipase from Candida antarctica B as the catalyst, no solvent, a molar ratio of 1:9 (HT to EPA), and a reaction temperature of 48 °C, a conversion yield of 59% was achieved.
The optimized conditions for esterifying Et-EPA showed a marked improvement in yield compared to previously reported EPA esterification methods [27,45]. Although higher yields have been reported in some studies [40,46], those typically involve the use of solvents, which may favor conversion but compromise time efficiency. In contrast, our solvent-free approach not only facilitates reproducibility and reduces purification, as shown in similar processes, such as HT oleate esterification [47,48], but also offers an eco-friendlier alternative. Additionally, our reported yield reflects a stricter metric of efficiency, as it refers to the purified compound rather than pre-purification conversion. It is important to highlight that a shorter reaction time (3 h) was sufficient to achieve a comparable yield. It is also important to clarify that we intentionally avoided the use of free fatty acids, not only to avoid the redundancy of synthesizing EPA from Et-EPA, [49] but also to streamline the purification process.
This strategic choice contributes to a more streamlined and potentially scalable synthesis pathway. The use of immobilized lipases in continuous systems has already been demonstrated as a viable route for industrial scale-up [50,51]. When combined with the high functional performance of HT-EPA, its alignment with natural product trends, and the potential use of low-cost feedstocks [52], this approach suggests a favorable cost-effectiveness balance, especially in the context of high-value applications in food and cosmetic formulations.
According to the results summarized in Table 1, the FRAP analysis did not reveal differences between the antioxidant capacity of hydroxytyrosol (1) and its derivatives (2,3) in practical terms. However, a statistically significant difference was observed when these compounds were compared to α-tocopherol, a lipophilic antioxidant commonly used in the food industry. These findings are consistent with previous FRAP-based comparisons of HT and HT-Ac [53], and they offer new insights about the reducing power of HT-EPA. Similarly, other studies have reported no significant differences between HT and HT-Ac or HT-EPA, as well as other lipophilic esters [46,47], although different antioxidant capacity assays (ABTS and DPPH) were used.
In contrast, the ABTS assay revealed statistically significant differences between HT and its esterified forms, suggesting that esterification may influence certain radical-scavenging mechanisms. Nonetheless, all hydroxytyrosol-based compounds showed markedly higher antioxidant capacity than α-tocopherol, confirming their strong potential as lipid-phase antioxidants. Despite these assay-dependent variations, the overall consistency across various electron and/or hydrogen-transfer-based techniques [54] supports the idea that esterification does not substantially compromise the antioxidant capacity of HT, aligning with similar observations in other phenolic esters [55].
Regarding the Rancimat experiment illustrated in Figure 2, both HT-Ac and HT-EPA esters exhibited similar stabilization effects in our matrix, but greater protection against oxidation when compared with α-tocopherol. This result further supports that esterification does not compromise the antioxidant capacity of HT, which efficiently mitigates oxidation in the EPA matrix, an effect not observed with α-tocopherol. Previous evidence has shown that HT esters display comparable antioxidant performance in an oily matrix [21,32], although ITs were proportionally longer in the olive oil matrix (primarily due to its monounsaturated nature) compared to the EPA polyunsaturated oil matrix. To enhance the resolution of IT differences, the assay temperature was lowered from 100 °C to 80 °C. Nevertheless, this adjustment may not have been enough to fully capture the extent of the oxidative stability differences.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to directly assess the oxidative stability in a purified ethyl-EPA matrix, rather than in a complex fish oil, such as anchovy oil [46], which contains a mixture of different fatty acids. This distinction is especially important given our formulation goal of developing soft-gel capsules containing purified ethyl-EPA for human consumption. By using this simplified matrix, we eliminated confounding interactions from other oil components, allowing for a clear understanding of the intrinsic antioxidant performance of HT-EPA. Furthermore, the concentration range was extended up to 20 mM, well beyond the previously reported maximum of approximately 4 mM and likely allowing for clearer differentiation of the stability between HT and its esters.
Looking ahead, future research could explore the long-term oxidative stability of these compounds under realistic storage conditions to better assess their practical applicability. In addition, in vivo studies are needed to investigate their health-related effects, with particular attention to the bioavailability and metabolic fate of these conjugates, in order to determine whether the esterification affects the absorption and physiological activity of hydroxytyrosol.

5. Conclusions

The findings in this study reinforce the potential of HT esterification as a strategy to develop potent, lipophilic antioxidants that overcome the limitations of existing fat-soluble antioxidants in the food industry. By improving nutraceutical stability and leveraging the synergistic effects of EPA and HT, this approach not only offers a more effective solution for managing elevated triglyceride levels but also provides a powerful tool to combat oxidative stress, both of which are key drivers of cardiovascular disease. This could ultimately contribute to preventing cardiovascular events, which broadly impact global health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L.E., R.M. and L.G.; methodology, N.G-A., R.C. and M.J.; software, N.G.-A.; validation, N.G.-A. and R.C.; formal analysis, N.G.-A. and R.C.; investigation, N.G.-A., R.M. and J.L.E.; resources, J.L.E. and R.M.; data curation, J.L.E. and R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, N.G.-A.; writing—review and editing, N.G.-A., R.M., J.L.E. and L.G.; visualization, J.L.E. and R.M.; supervision, J.L.E. and R.M.; project administration, J.L.E. and R.M.; funding acquisition, R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MICIN), and Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), grant number PID2021-125259OB-I00. N.G-A and M.J. are recipients of FPI predoctoral fellowships also from MICIN/AEI (PRE2022-105658 and PRE2022-102252, respectively).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ignacio Escudero Abad for his valuable technical support. We would also like to thank Pablo Mielgo González for his insightful advice on the methodological and statistical aspects of this study. Lastly, we acknowledge the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) service at the CITIUS Center of the University of Sevilla for their assistance and access to instrumentation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ABTS2,2′-Azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)
AcOEtEthyl Acetate
APCIAtmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization
BHTButylated Hydroxytoluene
CALBCandida antarctica lipase B
COSYCorrelation Spectroscopy
CVDsCardiovascular Diseases
DHADocosahexaenoic acid
DMSO-d6 Hexadeuterated Dimethyl Sulfoxide
DPPH2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
EPAEicosapentaenoic Acid
Et-EPAEthyl Eicosapentaenoate
ESIElectrospray Ionization
EVOOExtra Virgin Olive Oil
FRAPFerric Reducing Antioxidant Power
HESIHeated Electrospray Ionization
HMBCHeteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation
HSQCHeteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence
HTHydroxytyrosol
HT-AcHydroxytyrosyl Acetate
HT-EPAHydroxytyrosyl Eicosapentaenoate
ITInduction Time
LDLLow-Density Lipoprotein
MeTHF2-Methyl Tetrahydrofuran
NMRNuclear Magnetic Resonance
O3FAOmega-3 Fatty Acid
p-TsOHp-toluenesulfonic acid
SDStandard Deviation
TBMEtert-Butyl Methyl Ether
TEACTrolox equivalent antioxidant capacity
TGTriglycerides
TLCThin layer chromatography
TPTZ2,4,6-Tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine
Trolox(±)-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid
VOOVirgin Olive Oil

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Cardiovascular Diseases. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (accessed on 14 March 2025).
  2. Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Braun, L.T.; Ndumele, C.E.; Smith, S.C.; Sperling, L.S.; Virani, S.S.; Blumenthal, R.S. Use of Risk Assessment Tools to Guide Decision-Making in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Special Report From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 3153–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aberra, T.; Peterson, E.D.; Pagidipati, N.J.; Mulder, H.; Wojdyla, D.M.; Philip, S.; Granowitz, C.; Navar, A.M. The association between triglycerides and incident cardiovascular disease: What is “optimal”? J. Clin. Lipidol. 2020, 14, 438–447.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nichols, G.A.; Philip, S.; Reynolds, K.; Granowitz, C.B.; Fazio, S. Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertriglyceridemic Patients With Statin-Controlled LDL Cholesterol. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 3019–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nichols, G.A.; Philip, S.; Reynolds, K.; Granowitz, C.B.; Fazio, S. Increased residual cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes and high versus normal triglycerides despite statin-controlled LDL cholesterol. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019, 21, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Khan, S.U.; Lone, A.N.; Khan, M.S.; Virani, S.S.; Blumenthal, R.S.; Nasir, K.; Miller, M.; Michos, E.D.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Boden, W.E.; et al. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine 2021, 38, 100997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bhatt, D.L.; Gabriel Steg, P.; Miller, M.; Brinton, E.A.; Jacobson, T.A.; Ketchum, S.B.; Doyle, R.T.; Juliano, R.A.; Jiao, L.; Granowitz, C.; et al. Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with Icosapent Ethyl for Hypertriglyceridemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Budoff, M.J.; Bhatt, D.L.; Kinninger, A.; Lakshmanan, S.; Muhlestein, J.B.; Le, V.T.; May, H.T.; Shaikh, K.; Shekar, C.; Roy, S.K.; et al. Effect of icosapent ethyl on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with elevated triglycerides on statin therapy: Final results of the EVAPORATE trial. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 3925–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nicholls, S.J.; Lincoff, A.M.; Bash, D.; Ballantyne, C.M.; Barter, P.J.; Davidson, M.H.; Kastelein, J.J.P.; Koenig, W.; McGuire, D.K.; Mozaffarian, D.; et al. Assessment of omega-3 carboxylic acids in statin-treated patients with high levels of triglycerides and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: Rationale and design of the STRENGTH trial. Clin. Cardiol. 2018, 41, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yokoyama, M.; Origasa, H.; Matsuzaki, M.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Saito, Y.; Ishikawa, Y.; Oikawa, S.; Sasaki, J.; Hishida, H.; Itakura, H.; et al. Effects of eicosapentaenoic acid on major coronary events in hypercholesterolemic patients (JELIS): A randomised open-label, blinded endpoint analysis. Lancet 2007, 369, 1090–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shahidi, F.; Zhong, Y. Lipid oxidation and improving the oxidative stability. Chem Soc Rev 2010, 39, 4067–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ismail, A.; Bannenberg, G.; Rice, H.; Schutt, E.; MacKay, D. Oxidation in EPA- and DHA-rich oils: An overview. Lipid Technol. 2016, 28, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hansson, G.K. Inflammation and Atherosclerosis. Circulation 2017, 136, 1875–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Maqsood, S.; Benjakul, S.; Abushelaibi, A.; Alam, A. Phenolic Compounds and Plant Phenolic Extracts as Natural Antioxidants in Prevention of Lipid Oxidation in Seafood: A Detailed Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 1125–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lourenço, S.; Moldão Martins, M.; Alves, V. Antioxidants of Natural Plant Origins: From Sources to Food Industry Applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mateos, R.; Espartero, J.L.; Trujillo, M.; Ríos, J.J.; León-Camacho, M.; Alcudia, F.; Cert, A. Determination of Phenols, Flavones, and Lignans in Virgin Olive Oils by Solid-Phase Extraction and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Diode Array Ultraviolet Detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 2185–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brenes, M.; García, A.; García, P.; Rios, J.J.; Garrido, A. Phenolic Compounds in Spanish Olive Oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 3535–3540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Milena, E.; Maurizio, M. Exploring the Cardiovascular Benefits of Extra Virgin Olive Oil: Insights into Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Noguera-Navarro, C.; Montoro-García, S.; Orenes-Piñero, E. Hydroxytyrosol: Its role in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Heliyon 2023, 9, e12963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Frumuzachi, O.; Kieserling, H.; Rohn, S.; Mocan, A. The Impact of Oleuropein, Hydroxytyrosol, and Tyrosol on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 65, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pastor, R.; Bouzas, C.; Tur, J.A. Beneficial Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Olive Oil, Oleic Acid, or Hydroxytyrosol in Metabolic Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 172, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Menezes, R.C.R.; Peres, K.K.; Costa-Valle, M.T.; Faccioli, L.S.; Dallegrave, E.; Garavaglia, J.; Dal Bosco, S.M. Oral Administration of Oleuropein and Olive Leaf Extract Has Cardioprotective Effects in Rodents: A Systematic Review. Rev. Port. Cardiol. 2022, 41, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Alcudia González, F. Method of Preparing Hydroxytyrosol Esters, Esters Thus Obtained and Use of Same. U.S. Patent US20050154058A1, 14 July 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. Trujillo, M.; Mateos, R.; Collantes de Teran, L.; Espartero, J.L.; Cert, R.; Jover, M.; Alcudia, F.; Bautista, J.; Cert, A.; Parrado, J. Lipophilic Hydroxytyrosyl Esters. Antioxidant Activity in Lipid Matrices and Biological Systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 3779–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a Measure of “Antioxidant Power”: The FRAP Assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Torres de Pinedo, A.; Peñalver, P.; Rondón, D.; Morales, J.C. Efficient lipase-catalyzed synthesis of new lipid antioxidants based on a catechol structure. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7654–7660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Simeó, Y.; Sinisterra, J.V.; Alcántara, A.R. Regioselective enzymatic acylation of pharmacologically interesting nucleosides in 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, a greener substitute for THF. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 855–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silva, A.F.R.; Resende, D.; Monteiro, M.; Coimbra, M.A.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cardoso, S.M. Application of Hydroxytyrosol in the Functional Foods Field: From Ingredient to Dietary Supplements. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Monteiro, M.; Silva, A.F.R.; Resende, D.; Braga, S.S.; Coimbra, M.A.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cardoso, S.M. Strategies to Broaden the Applications of Olive Biophenols Oleuropein and Hydroxytyrosol in Food Products. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Laszlo, J.A.; Cermak, S.C.; Evans, K.O.; Compton, D.L.; Evangelista, R.; Berhow, M.A. Medium-chain alkyl esters of tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol antioxidants by cuphea oil transesterification. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2013, 115, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roleira, F.M.F.; Siquet, C.; Orrù, E.; Garrido, E.M.; Garrido, J.; Milhazes, N.; Podda, G.; Paiva-Martins, F.; Reis, S.; Carvalho, R.A.; et al. Lipophilic phenolic antioxidants: Correlation between antioxidant profile, partition coefficients and redox properties. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 5816–5825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Floris, B.; Galloni, P.; Conte, V.; Sabuzi, F. Tailored Functionalization of Natural Phenols to Improve Biological Activity. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Azzi, A. Molecular mechanism of α-tocopherol action. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 43, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Colombo, M.L. An Update on Vitamin E, Tocopherol and Tocotrienol—Perspectives. Molecules 2010, 15, 2103–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mateos, R.; Domínguez, M.M.; Espartero, J.L.; Cert, A. Antioxidant Effect of Phenolic Compounds, α-Tocopherol, and Other Minor Components in Virgin Olive Oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7170–7175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Botterweck, A.A.M.; Verhagen, H.; Goldbohm, R.A.; Kleinjans, J.; van den Brandt, P.A. Intake of butylated hydroxyanisole and butylated hydroxytoluene and stomach cancer risk: Results from analyses in the Netherlands Cohort Study. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food, (ANS) Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of butylated hydroxytoluene BHT (E 321) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2012, 10, 2588.
  39. Xu, X.; Liu, A.; Hu, S.; Ares, I.; Martínez-Larrañaga, M.; Wang, X.; Martínez, M.; Anadón, A.; Martínez, M. Synthetic phenolic antioxidants: Metabolism, hazards and mechanism of action. Food Chem. 2021, 353, 129488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Yu, J.; Guo, X.; Tong, P.; Yin, F.; Liu, X.; Zhou, D. The potential of hydroxytyrosol fatty acid esters to enhance oral bioavailabilities of hydroxytyrosol and fatty acids: Continuous and slow-release ability in small intestine and blood. Food Chem. 2023, 422, 136246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Torres de Pinedo, A.; Peñalver, P.; Pérez-Victoria, I.; Rondón, D.; Morales, J.C. Synthesis of new phenolic fatty acid esters and their evaluation as lipophilic antioxidants in an oil matrix. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Medina, I.; Lois, S.; Alcántara, D.; Lucas, R.; Morales, J.C. Effect of Lipophilization of Hydroxytyrosol on Its Antioxidant Activity in Fish Oils and Fish Oil-in-Water Emulsions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 9773–9779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pazos, M.; Alonso, A.; Sánchez, I.; Medina, I. Hydroxytyrosol Prevents Oxidative Deterioration in Foodstuffs Rich in Fish Lipids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3334–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Crauste, C.; Rosell, M.; Durand, T.; Vercauteren, J. Omega-3 polyunsaturated lipophenols, how and why? Biochimie 2016, 120, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhong, Y.; Shahidi, F. Lipophilized Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) Derivatives as Novel Antioxidants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 6526–6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Akanbi, T.O.; Barrow, C.J. Lipase-Produced Hydroxytyrosyl Eicosapentaenoate is an Excellent Antioxidant for the Stabilization of Omega-3 Bulk Oils, Emulsions and Microcapsules. Molecules 2018, 23, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bouallagui, Z.; Bouaziz, M.; Lassoued, S.; Engasser, J.M.; Ghoul, M.; Sayadi, S. Hydroxytyrosol Acyl Esters: Biosynthesis and Activities. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2011, 163, 592–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Qi, Y.Y.; Gong, T.; Zhao, P.T.; Niu, Y.J.; Hu, Y.Y.; Hu, C.Y.; Zhang, S.; Meng, Y.H. Hydroxytyrosyl oleate is a promising safe additive to inhibit the oxidation of olive oil. Food Control 2023, 153, 109895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhou, D.; Sun, Y.; Shahidi, F. Preparation and antioxidant activity of tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol esters. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 37, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Villeneuve, P.; Muderhwa, J.M.; Graille, J.; Haas, M.J. Customizing lipases for biocatalysis: A survey of chemical, physical and molecular biological approaches. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2000, 9, 113–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fjerbaek, L.; Christensen, K.V.; Norddahl, B. A review of the current state of biodiesel production using enzymatic transesterification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 102, 1298–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salta, F.N.; Kosma, I.S.; Lordan, R.; Vlachogianni, I.C.; Ladavos, A.K.; Zampounis, A. Olive phenolic compounds: A novel class of nutraceuticals and their impact on human health. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1325. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pereira-Caro, G.; Sarriá, B.; Madrona, A.; Espartero, J.L.; Escuderos, M.E.; Bravo, L.; Mateos, R. Digestive stability of hydroxytyrosol, hydroxytyrosyl acetate and alkyl hydroxytyrosyl ethers. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 63, 703–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liang, N.; Kitts, D.D. Antioxidant Property of Coffee Components: Assessment of Methods that Define Mechanisms of Action. Molecules 2014, 19, 19180–19208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhu, S.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Ma, C.; Lou, Z.; Yokoyama, W.; Wang, H. Lipase-catalyzed synthesis of acetylated EGCG and antioxidant properties of the acetylated derivatives. Food Res. Int. 2014, 56, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Chemical structures of HT and the synthesized HT esters. Reaction conditions: (a) AcOEt, p-TsOH, reflux; (b) Et-EPA, Novozyme 435, 48 °C.
Scheme 1. Chemical structures of HT and the synthesized HT esters. Reaction conditions: (a) AcOEt, p-TsOH, reflux; (b) Et-EPA, Novozyme 435, 48 °C.
Biomolecules 15 00714 sch001
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, 303 K) of (a) hydroxytyrosol (HT, 1), (b) hydroxytyrosyl acetate (HT-Ac, 2) and (c) hydroxytyrosyl eicosapentaenoate (HT-EPA, 3).
Figure 1. 1H NMR spectra (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, 303 K) of (a) hydroxytyrosol (HT, 1), (b) hydroxytyrosyl acetate (HT-Ac, 2) and (c) hydroxytyrosyl eicosapentaenoate (HT-EPA, 3).
Biomolecules 15 00714 g001
Figure 2. Induction times (ITs) of the Et-EPA matrix spiked with hydroxytyrosol (HT, 1), hydroxytyrosyl acetate (HT-Ac, 2), hydroxytyrosyl eicosapentaenoate (HT-EPA, 3), and the commercial food antioxidant α-tocopherol. * Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Induction times (ITs) of the Et-EPA matrix spiked with hydroxytyrosol (HT, 1), hydroxytyrosyl acetate (HT-Ac, 2), hydroxytyrosyl eicosapentaenoate (HT-EPA, 3), and the commercial food antioxidant α-tocopherol. * Indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Biomolecules 15 00714 g002
Table 1. Reducing antioxidant power and scavenging radical activity assessment using FRAP assay and ABTS, respectively, of hydroxytyrosol (HT, 1), ester derivatives (23), and α-tocopherol.
Table 1. Reducing antioxidant power and scavenging radical activity assessment using FRAP assay and ABTS, respectively, of hydroxytyrosol (HT, 1), ester derivatives (23), and α-tocopherol.
CompoundFRAP TEAC (mM)ABTS TEAC (mM)
Hydroxytyrosol (1, HT)1.33 ± 0.06 a1.47 ± 0.05 a
Hydroxytyrosol acetate (2, HT-Ac)1.28 ± 0.03 ab0.98 ± 0.03 b
Hydroxytyrosol eicosapentaenoate (3, HT-EPA)1.22 ± 0.06 b0.98 ± 0.05 b
α-Tocopherol (4, Alpha-T)0.64 ± 0.02 c0.79 ± 0.06 c
All values within a column with a different letter are significantly different (p < 0.05). Data represent the mean of triplicate measurements (1, 4) or six replicates (2, 3) ± standard deviations. Results are expressed as Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) in mM units.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Acosta, N.; Cert, R.; Jordán, M.; Goya, L.; Mateos, R.; Espartero, J.L. Hydroxytyrosyl Eicosapentaenoate as a Potential Antioxidant for Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Improved Synthesis and Comparative Evaluation with Other Natural Antioxidants. Biomolecules 2025, 15, 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15050714

AMA Style

García-Acosta N, Cert R, Jordán M, Goya L, Mateos R, Espartero JL. Hydroxytyrosyl Eicosapentaenoate as a Potential Antioxidant for Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Improved Synthesis and Comparative Evaluation with Other Natural Antioxidants. Biomolecules. 2025; 15(5):714. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15050714

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Acosta, Natalia, Rosa Cert, Marta Jordán, Luis Goya, Raquel Mateos, and Jose Luis Espartero. 2025. "Hydroxytyrosyl Eicosapentaenoate as a Potential Antioxidant for Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Improved Synthesis and Comparative Evaluation with Other Natural Antioxidants" Biomolecules 15, no. 5: 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15050714

APA Style

García-Acosta, N., Cert, R., Jordán, M., Goya, L., Mateos, R., & Espartero, J. L. (2025). Hydroxytyrosyl Eicosapentaenoate as a Potential Antioxidant for Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Improved Synthesis and Comparative Evaluation with Other Natural Antioxidants. Biomolecules, 15(5), 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15050714

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop