Next Article in Journal
Influence of the Levels of Arsenic, Cadmium, Mercury and Lead on Overall Survival in Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Strontium Binding to α-Parvalbumin, a Canonical Calcium-Binding Protein of the “EF-Hand” Family
Previous Article in Special Issue
Amelioration of Chlorpyrifos-Induced Toxicity in Brassica juncea L. by Combination of 24-Epibrassinolide and Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Transcription Factors Interact with ABA through Gene Expression and Signaling Pathways to Mitigate Drought and Salinity Stress

1
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, 666 Wusu Street, Hangzhou 311300, China
2
Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tobacco Biology and Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Qingdao 266101, China
3
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agric-Environment and Agric-Products Safety, Agricultural College of Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Who contribute equally to this manuscript.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(8), 1159; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081159
Submission received: 16 June 2021 / Revised: 26 July 2021 / Accepted: 3 August 2021 / Published: 5 August 2021

Abstract

:
Among abiotic stressors, drought and salinity seriously affect crop growth worldwide. In plants, research has aimed to increase stress-responsive protein synthesis upstream or downstream of the various transcription factors (TFs) that alleviate drought and salinity stress. TFs play diverse roles in controlling gene expression in plants, which is necessary to regulate biological processes, such as development and environmental stress responses. In general, plant responses to different stress conditions may be either abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent or ABA-independent. A detailed understanding of how TF pathways and ABA interact to cause stress responses is essential to improve tolerance to drought and salinity stress. Despite previous progress, more active approaches based on TFs are the current focus. Therefore, the present review emphasizes the recent advancements in complex cascades of gene expression during drought and salinity responses, especially identifying the specificity and crosstalk in ABA-dependent and -independent signaling pathways. This review also highlights the transcriptional regulation of gene expression governed by various key TF pathways, including AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, DREB, GATA, HD-Zip, Homeo-box, MADS-box, MYB, NAC, Tri-helix, WHIRLY, WOX, WRKY, YABBY, and zinc finger, operating in ABA-dependent and -independent signaling pathways.

1. Introduction

Being sessile, plants are susceptible to various adverse environmental conditions. Plants inherently live in harsh conditions [1], and the natural environment of plants comprises abiotic and biotic stressors [2]. Abiotic stressors are the foremost limiting factors, e.g., drought, high salinity, low temperature, high temperature, nutrient stress, and heavy metals, and are hostile to plant growth and development, ultimately affecting crop productivity and sustainability [3,4,5].
Drought and salinity periods interrupt the ionic and osmotic strength, encourage the redox balance and cellular energy, and cause the loss of photosynthesis [6]. Drought stress is one of the leading aspects of regulating crop production, provoking many physiological, molecular, biochemical, and anatomical changes [7]. Salinity is a significant factor that decreases crop production by deteriorating plant health [8]. There are different transcription factors (TFs) involved in drought and salinity stress responses; for example, MtHB2 in Medicago truncatula [9], Zmhdz10 in maize [10], OsGATA23a in rice [11], and ATHB17 in Arabidopsis [12] play an essential role in response to drought and salinity stress. Phytohormones are crucial integrators for the association and growth of adaptive mechanisms in response to stress. Abscisic acid (ABA) is a significant regulator of numerous flexible traits of plant developmental improvements, including embryo maturation, germination, seed dormancy, floral initiation, and root growth. ABA also decreases the detrimental effects of stress, such as those caused by drought, in plants [13].
ABA is a plant hormone that helps plants respond to drought. Drought-responsive genes may be divided into two categories based on their ABA response: ABA-dependent and ABA-independent genes [13]. Even though numerous drought-responsive genes are engaged in the ABA signaling system, most drought-induced genes do not react to ABA treatment, indicating the presence of ABA-independent drought-response pathways [14]. Numerous genes are involved in response to drought and salinity stress; under such conditions, tolerance is triggered by osmotic stress, which liberates ABA [15]. ABA-dependent and -independent mechanisms control osmotic stress-responsive gene expression [16]. Plants’ stress response systems, for example, comprise both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent activities. DREB2A/2B, AREB1, RD22BP1, and MYC/MYB are the TFs that interact with their corresponding cis-acting elements, DRE/CRT, ABRE, and MYCRS/MYBRS, respectively, to regulate the ABA-responsive gene expression [17].
DFREB1/CBF-type TFs are critical in water and salt stress tolerance in higher plants. These TFs regulate the expression of target genes by binding to CRT/DRE sites in their promoters. Drought and salt stress, as well as exogenous ABA, stimulated MbDREB1 expression [18]. MbDREB1 promoter analysis identified an ABA-responsive element (ABRE) that induced an ICE1-like binding site, two MYB recognition sites, and three stress-inducible GT-1 boxes. ABA, drought, and salt treatments activated GUS activity in transgenic Arabidopsis [18].
Conversely, both ABA-independent and ABA-dependent stress-induced genes (COR15a and rd29B, respectively) were upregulated in Arabidopsis overexpressing MbDREB1. Both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways used MbDREB1 to activate plant tolerance to low temperature, drought, and salt stress [18]. Salt and drought stress induced PR-1, PR-5, RAB-18, and RD-29A genes in plants pretreated with ABA [19]. Both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent osmotic stress signaling first adjust constitutively expressed TFs, leading to the expression of early response transcriptional activators, activating downstream stress tolerance effector genes [20]. TFs play diverse roles in controlling gene expression [21] in plants, necessary for regulating biological processes, such as development and environmental stress responses [22]. TFs are the key molecular switches that enable plants to withstand harsh conditions and direct the plant’s developmental process in response to abiotic stress [23]. TFs play an essential role in crop improvements and are considered good candidates for improving tolerance to various abiotic stressors [24]. TFs are considered the best genetic materials to breed and develop stress-tolerant crop varieties because of their role as master regulators of many stress response-related genes compared to manipulation in a single functional gene [25]. For improving abiotic stress resilience in plants, Tripathi et al. [26] discussed the contributions of new technologies such as DAP-seq, bulk, or single-cell ChIP-seq RNA-seq yeast 1-hybrid and CRISPR/Cas9. ChIP-seq is a method used to analyze protein interactions with DNA. ChIP-seq combines ChIP with massively parallel DNA sequencing to identify the binding sites of DNA-associated proteins [26]. The chIP or yeast one-hybrid method has a role in identifying co-regulated genes that are strongly differentially expressed in response to the stress treatment and characterization of TFs that regulate many target genes [26]. A high-throughput TF binding site discovery method using genomic DNA in vitro can quickly identify target genes that directly bind downstream transcription factors. The DAP-seq method is fast, inexpensive, and more easily scaled than the ChIP-seq method [27]. For example, comparative transcriptomics informed by phylogenetic relationships uncovered lineage and extremophile-specific differences in ABA response. DAP-Seq was utilized to establish GRNs in each species for the entire ABA-AREB/ABF clade [28]. The stress-inducible CRISPR/Cas9 is a robust, practical, and helpful approach for developing crop varieties resistant to climate change. It will be a helpful tool for capable and particular genome editing in different plants for several traits, including abiotic stresses [29]. Therefore, some genes are targeted through genome editing based on CRISPR/Cas9 technology in different crops. Another yeast two-hybrid method is a well-established genetics-based system that uses yeast to display binary protein-protein interactions [30]. Using such techniques, the PYL6 and MYC2 interact, and their interaction is enhanced in the presence of ABA [31].
Both drought and salinity are among the most severe abiotic factors restricting plant growth and yield. ABA-dependent (drought-inducible genes were clarified upon their induction by exogenous ABA, which means two different systems in stress-inducible gene expression; later, ABA-dependent genes are regulated by endogenous ABA based on mutant analyses) ABA-independent pathways regulate numerous genes that function in drought response. Many signaling molecules, such as ABA, ROS, H2O2, NO, Ca2+, PAs, and others, have been well known and revealed in plant signaling perception and transduction pathways. Many drought- and salinity-responsive genes are involved in ABA-signaling pathways, such as ABA-inducible (ABA-inducible genes were genes induced by exogenous ABA treatment in the early phase of research; now, ABA-inducible genes are regulated by endogenous ABA, as well), ABA-sensitivity (ABA-sensitivity is phenotypes related to ABA sensitive responses during germination, stress response, and so on; various mutants and ecotypes have been reported to be ABA-sensitive ones based on their responses to ABA), and ABA-mediated (ABA-mediated genes are genes regulated by ABA signaling pathways in stress responses and plant growth). However, several drought- and salinity-induced genes do not respond to ABA signaling, showing that ABA-independent signaling pathways also regulate the response to drought and salinity stress. This review mainly focuses on the recent progress and development of TFs and their upstream and downstream ABA-related genes to emphasize the role of ABA genetic engineering in drought and salinity tolerance in various crops and sheds light on various TF families’ functions to orchestrate the tolerance response in crop species.

TFs Regulatory Network in Response to Drought and Salinity Stress

A transcription factor is a protein that binds to DNA and regulates gene expression by promoting or suppressing transcription. The function of TFs is to regulate turn on and off genes and ensure their expression in the suitable cell at the right time and the right amount throughout the life of the cell and the organism [32]. Transcription factors are modular in structure and contain two domains. The first is the DNA-binding domain, which attaches to specific DNA sequences (enhancer or promoter) adjacent to regulated genes. DNA sequences that bind transcription factors are often referred to as response elements [33]. The second is the activation domain, which contains binding sites for other proteins such as transcription coregulatory. These binding sites are frequently referred to as activation functions, transactivation domains, or trans-activating domains but do not mix with the topologically associating domain [32,33]. Generally, a stress signal transduction pathway comprises the following key steps: (1) signal perception, (2) signal transduction, and (3) stress response. The first step in activating a signaling cascade for drought and salinity stress recognizes stress signal via receptors located on the membrane of the plant cell [34]. After recognition, these sensors transmit the signal downstream through phytohormones and second messengers such as Ca2+ and ROS [35]. The second messengers, such as ROS, trigger another set of ROS-modulated PKs and PPs, including MAPK cascades, CDPKs, CBLs, CIPK, and many other PKs, as well PPs such as some PP2Cs (Figure 1) [34]. ABA is the principal hormone involved in the coordination of abiotic stress in plants [36]. The different stress tolerance responsive TFs usually function independently. However, there is a possibility that some level of cross-link occurs between these TFs (Figure 1). The last step is the expression of functional genes involved in different functions such as stomatal closure, oxidative damage, leaf senescence, or indirectly regulating regulatory genes contributing to signaling cascades and transcriptional regulation of gene expression [34,37]. These abilities allow them to be excellent candidate genes for genetic manipulation of complex stress tolerance traits [38]. To date, based on genome-wide analysis, a great deal of TFs belonging to different families, such as AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, DREB, GATA, HD-Zip, Homeo-box, MADS-box, MYB, NAC, Tri-helix, WHIRLY, WOX, WRKY, YABBY, and zinc finger, and so on, have been identified in different plant species [39,40].

2. TFs Involved in Drought and Salinity Stress Responses

2.1. AP2/ERF

The AP2/ERF is one of the largest families of TFs, with 140–280 members in several plants [41,42], which regulate multiple responses such as stress, metabolism, and development in plants [43]. In the past, AP2/ERF genes were considered plant-specific, but recently, this domain was reported in non-plants, such as in the protists, ciliate, cyanobacterium, and phages [44,45]. The rice ABA-independent gene OsERF48 directly binds to the promoter of OsCML16 via AP2/ERF cis-acting regulatory elements, thereby activating its transcription. Overexpression of OsERF48 causes regulation of OsCML16, a calmodulin-like protein gene that enhances root growth, drought tolerance, and grain yield and is involved in cell wall proteins, carbohydrate metabolism, and stress signaling in drought conditions in the field [46]. The rice OsERF71 gene is an AP2/ERF TF involved in an ABA-independent pathway controlling drought resistance by regulating cell wall modifications. After OsERF71 overexpression, roots are sufficient for drought resistance phenotypes and increase yield under drought stress [47]. The Arabidopsis shine (SHN) clade of the AP2 domain TFs activates wax biosynthesis and lipid biosynthetic pathways. Overexpression of each of the three SHN-1, -2, and -3 genes produced a phenotype similar to that of the first SHN mutant. SHN gene overexpression changed leaf and petal epidermal cell structure, trichome number and branching, and stomatal index. The SHN clade plays a role in plant protective layers; for example, those shaped during abscission, dehiscence, wounding, and diverse functions are mediated by regulating lipid or cell wall components [48] (Figure 2, Table 1). The OsERF922 gene was strongly induced in an ABA-signaling pathway after salt treatment and has been targeted successfully in rice. After overexpressing this gene, the ratio of Na+/K+ in the shoots increased, and consequently, the tolerance to salt stress decreased. The cis-regulatory sequences of the OsERF922 gene’s GCC box (AGCCGCC) function as negative regulators of salinity tolerance by providing binding sites for particular TFs. These cis-regulatory sequences could serve as a suitable target for creating nucleotide level mutations using recent genome editing tools that improve the tolerance to salinity stress in crops [49]. AP2/ERFs stand out among the essential TFs that regulate reactions, such as metabolism, stress, and improvement in plants. PsAP2 was isolated from a different AP2/ERF in Papaver somniferum, upregulated in response to methyl jasmonate, wounding by ethylene, and activation of ABA [43]. PsAP2 overexpression in transgenic tobacco plants showed increased tolerance to both abiotic and biotic stress [43]. ERF TFs are involved in regulating gene expression under biotic and abiotic stress. Transcription of the T. aestivum ethylene-responsive factor 1 (TaERF1) gene was induced not only by salinity, exogenous ABA, drought and low-temperature stress, salicylic acid, and ethylene, but also by infection with Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici. Moreover, TaERF1 overexpression activated stress-related genes, including PR and COR/RD genes, under normal growth conditions and enhanced pathogen and abiotic stress resistance in transgenic plants [50] (Table 1).

2.2. bHLH

Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) TFs are involved in various developmental processes and respond to biotic and abiotic stress. Arabidopsis AtbHLH68 encodes a bHLH through ABA-dependent or -independent pathways and is highly expressed in the lateral root, during LR elongation, and in drought stress knock-out mutants, which have development phenotypes compared to the wild type. After overexpressing AtbHLH68, lateral root formation was defective, and the plant had a significantly increased tolerance to drought stress, which was likely related to its enhanced sensitivity to ABA and increased ABA content. AtbHLH68 functions to directly or indirectly regulate ABA signaling and metabolism components, likely through an ABA-dependent pathway [51]. Overexpression of the Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) FtbHLH3 gene in Arabidopsis increased drought tolerance, which was attributed to lower MDA, ROS leakage, higher proline content, and photosynthetic efficiency. FtbHLH3 is an ABA-dependent pathway and is a positive regulator of drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis [52]. The Populus euphratica PebHLH35 gene was induced by drought and ABA treatment. PebHLH35 is a positive regulator of drought stress responses, influencing growth, photosynthesis, stomatal aperture, and stomatal density.
Furthermore, its overexpression in Arabidopsis caused more leaves and a greater leaf area and increased the primary root length [53]. The wheat TabHLH49 gene is drought stress-related bHLH TF that positively regulates the dehydrin WZY2 gene and improves drought tolerance in wheat [54]. The rice OsbHLH068 gene is a member of the bHLH TFs, part of the ABA-dependent pathway, and delayed seed germination and late flowering. OsbHLH068 overexpression in Arabidopsis resulted in late flowering, delayed seed germination, decreased salt-induced H2O2 accumulation, increased MDA, and promoted root elongation [55]. The rice OsbHLH035 bHLH TF is involved in germinating seeds and enabling the recovery of seedlings from salt stress through the ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. After overexpression of the OsbHLH035 gene, seed germination was delayed, and the average growth of Arabidopsis seedlings recovered after salt stress [56] (Figure 3, Table 1). It is well reported that bHLH TFs play essential roles in gene regulation in many plant species under various abiotic stressors [57]. Arabidopsis AabHLH35, a bHLH gene, conferred cold and drought tolerance to A. andraeanum and might also help bring tolerance to various abiotic stressors in other ornamental species. AabHLH35 transgenic Arabidopsis plants better tolerated both cold and drought stress [57]. AtbHLH112 is a bHLH TF induced by abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing AtbHLH112 had enhanced salt and drought tolerance, caused by various physiological modulations, including higher proline accumulation and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities to curb ROS damage [58].
Similarly, in another study, salt and drought stress upregulated the AtbHLH112 gene, and their knockout mutant phenotype showed late flowering [55]. EcbHLH57 overexpressing tobacco plants exhibited improved tolerance levels to drought and salt stress. In response to drought stress, transgenic tobacco plants had improved photosynthesis capabilities and higher biomass accumulation. Similarly, EcbHLH57 overexpressing tobacco plants showed minor oxidative damage under salt stress, as lower MDA and H2O2 levels were observed [59]. The apple (Malus Domestica) MdPIF3 gene is a bHLH TF that plays a critical role in plant growth and development during drought and cold stress. MdPIF3 overexpression reduced cold tolerance but enhanced drought resistance in apple callus and Arabidopsis [60]. MfbHLH38 is a bHLH gene and has shown a prominent role in improving drought and salt stress tolerance. MfbHLH38 transgenic Arabidopsis plants have a better water retention ability, osmotic balance, and less oxidative damage. The heterologous expression of MfbHLH38 in Arabidopsis exhibited better performance, which was observed as higher chlorophyll content, lower MDA level, improved antioxidant enzyme activity, and higher proline and soluble sugar content, under both salt and drought stress, thus enhancing their tolerance. Moreover, the water retention ability of MfbHLH38 transgenic plants has been greatly improved via stomatal closure due to a higher ABA content and biosynthesis-related gene expression (NCED3) under mannitol and ABA treatment [61].

2.3. bZIP

The Poncirus trifoliata ABF (PtrABF) was localized in the nucleus and revealed transactivation action in yeast cells bound to ABRE, supporting its role as a TF. Significant levels of PtrABF have been stimulated by ABA, low temperature, and dehydration treatments. PtrABF overexpression enhanced drought tolerance and dehydration in tobacco by scavenging ROS and modifying the expression of stress-responsive genes [62]. ABF3, AREB2, and AREB1 are excellent TFs that cooperate to complete ABRE-dependent ABA-signaling pathways for drought stress tolerance [63]. OsbZIP72 plays a decisive role in drought resistance through ABA signaling and may help with drought tolerance in rice. OsbZIP72 is a critical regulator in abiotic stress reactions and ABA signaling transduction pathways [64] (Figure 2, Table 1). A subcellular limitation investigation showed that TabZIP60 is an atomic restricted protein that initiates TFs. The TabZIP60 gene is strongly encouraged by treatments with exogenous ABA, salt, polyethylene glycol, and cold. In Arabidopsis, TabZIP60 gene overexpression fundamentally enhanced resistance to salt and drought stress and expanded plant affectability to ABA in seedling development [65]. The OsABF2 gene is a constructive controller of ABA signaling and abiotic stress in rice [66]. OsABF2 has been linked to ABREs (Figure 3), and the homozygous T-DNA insertion mutant of OsABF2 was susceptible to drought, salinity, and oxidative stress relative to wild-type plants. OsABF2 functions as a transcription regulator that controls responsive gene expression with abiotic stress through the ABA-dependent pathway [66]. OsbZIP71 encodes a rice bZIP TF; it is an atomic-limited protein linked to the G-box theme but has no transcriptional movement in yeast or rice protoplasts [67]. OsbZIP71, a bZIP translation factor, may play a vital role in rice ABA-independent drought and salt tolerance [48]. TF OsbZIP46 directs ABA signaling-mediated drought tolerance in rice by regulating pressure-related genes [68]. ABA and drought pressure activated the OsbZIP46-interfacing protein MODD (mediator of OsbZIP46 deactivation and stress), also known as the Arabidopsis thaliana ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE5 restricting protein AFP; however, the induction was much slower. OsbZIP23 is a member of the bZIP TFs. Expression of the OsbZIP23 gene can cause an adverse effect on stress, including ABA, salt, and drought, while other stress-responsive genes of this family are slightly induced only by one or two of these stressors [69]. OsABI5 is involved in bZIP TFs and was isolated from Oryza sativa L. (Table 1). Expression of the OsABI5 gene was initiated by high salinity and ABA and downregulated by cold and drought in seedlings. Overexpression of the OsABI5 gene in rice conserved high sensitivity to salt stress, and OsABI5 repression enhanced drought stress tolerance and resulted in low rice fertility [70] (Table 1).

2.4. DREB

Dehydration-responsive element binding genes (DREBs) are essential plant TFs that control the expression of numerous stress-inducible genes, usually in an ABA-independent manner, and perform a critical role in improving drought and salinity stress tolerance in plants by interacting with a DRE/CRT cis-element present in the promoter region of various genes [71]. AtDREB1A overexpression in rice, wheat, groundnut, and tobacco improved drought tolerance and increased the expression of late embryogenic abundant (LEA) genes under greenhouse temperatures [72]. Three DREB homologous genes—GmDREBa, GmDREBb, and GmDREBc—were isolated from soybean; transcription of GmDREBa and GmDREBb caused drought, salt, and cold stress in the leaves of soybean seedlings (Table 1). Expression of the GmDREBc gene was not significantly affected in leaves but prompted by ABA treatment and drought and salt stress [73]. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants with DREB1 or DREB2 had improved tolerance to various abiotic stressors, including drought, salt, and freezing [74]. The dehydration responsive element binding (DREB) TF is involved in the plant stress signal transduction pathway. SbDREB2A improved abiotic stress tolerance in Escherichia coli; this gene is an A-2 type DREB transferred from the halophyte Salicornia brachiate, and its appearance was encouraged by heat stress, NaCl, and drought [75]. CBF/DREB1 TFs regulate cool acclimation reactions, and COR TFs (cold-regulated) control gene expression levels, thereby encouraging tolerance to freezing. Thus, changes in CBF/DREB1 genes have enabled many plants to resist environmental stress, mainly freezing [74].

2.5. GATA

The GATA gene family is one of the most conserved families of TFs, playing a significant role in different aspects of cellular processes, and their members vary in their expression with a different response to exogenous ABA, drought, and salinity stress. In rice, the OsGATA23a gene is a multi-stress responsive TF that increased expression levels under salinity and drought stress. ABA also induced the expression of OsGATA23a in different rice varieties [11]. Similarly, the rice OsGATA16 gene expressed in guard cells and all other plant tissues was induced by ABA treatment but suppressed by drought, cytokinin, and jasmonic acid treatments [76].

2.6. HD-Zip

The wheat TaHDZipI-5 gene, encoding the HD-Zip I TF, was ABA-dependent and regulated the development of drought tolerance. Overexpression of the wheat TaHDZipI-5 gene improved frost and drought tolerance of transgenic wheat lines. Compared to wild-type (WT) plants, the transgenic wheat lines were short, had delayed flowering, and had decreased grain yield and biomass [77]. The rice OsTF1L gene is a crucial regulator of drought tolerance mechanisms, and after overexpression in plants, the drought-inducible stomatal movement was upregulated. Lignin biosynthetic genes revealed a superior drought tolerance at the reproductive growth phase with a higher grain yield than non-transgenic controls under field-drought conditions [78]. The physic nut JcHDZ07 gene belongs to the HD-Zip family of TFs and is a nuclear-localized protein essential for physiological indices and the necessary regulatory process of plant responses to salinity stress. JcHDZ07 overexpression in Arabidopsis enhanced the sensitivity of transgenic lines to salt stress.
In contrast, transgenic plants had higher relative electrical leakage and malonaldehyde content than wild-type plants under salinity stress conditions but reduced survival rates, proline content, catalase, and superoxide dismutase activity [79]. Homeodomain–leucine zipper I (HD-Zip) is an essential family of TFs that play crucial roles in responding to various abiotic stressors. Zmhdz10 overexpression in rice plants caused better performance under drought and salt stress and a better tolerance level to these stressors. Similarly, Zmhdz10-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants also conferred salt and drought stress tolerance via differential expression of ABA and stress-responsive gene expression, including P5CS1, RD22, RD29B, and ABI1. Zmhdz10, a transcriptional regulator, activated the ABA-dependent pathway under drought and salinity stress, thus bringing tolerance to these stressors [10]. Medicago truncatula MtHB2 encodes a novel stress-responsive HD TF that negatively regulates abiotic stress response mechanisms. In Arabidopsis, transgenic plants expressing MtHB2 were more sensitive to drought, salt, and freezing stress, had fewer pro and soluble sugars, and had significantly higher MDA and H2O2 contents than wild-type plants [9]. The rice Oshox4 gene belongs to the HD-Zip I family, and its overexpression in transgenic lines increased tolerance to drought and salinity stress. The Oshox4 gene plays an essential role in rice osmatic tolerance and higher yield [80]. Gshdz4 is an HD-Zip TF in soybean that plays a responsive role in bicarbonate stress and enhances drought and salinity stress tolerance. Gshdz4 overexpression in Arabidopsis improved transgenic plants’ tolerance to bicarbonate stress via reduced chlorophyll degradation, while their performance was poor under osmotic stress [81]. The Arabidopsis ATHB17 HD-Zip TF regulated the expression of several photosynthesis-associated nuclear genes involved in the light reaction and ATSIG5 in response to abiotic stress. ATHB17 was responsive to ABA and multiple stress treatments and positively modulated the expression of many plastid-encoded genes through the regulation of ATSIG5. ATHB17-overexpressing plants displayed enhanced stress tolerance, whereas its knockout mutant was more sensitive than the wild-type and played an essential role in protecting plants by adjusting the expression of PhANGs and PEGs in response to abiotic stress [12].

2.7. Homeobox

Homeobox TFs are well-known regulators of plant growth and development [82]. Two stress-responsive homeobox candidate genes, OsHOX22 and OsHOX24, were upregulated under different abiotic stress conditions at various rice growth phases [82]. These gene transcription stages improved in the presence of phytohormones (ABA, auxin, salicylic acid, and gibberellin). OsHOX24 overexpression affected ABA, abiotic stress, and stress hormones in transgenic Arabidopsis [82]. Many of these genes are engaged in transcriptional control and metabolic pathways, which play the role of homeobox proteins as adverse regulators in abiotic stress response [82].

2.8. MADS-Box

The MADS-box family of TFs are critical regulators of plants and are involved in many biological processes [83]. The Solanum lycopersicum agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL15-like gene, SlMBP11, is a TF that enhances salt stress tolerance, perhaps through an ABA-independent signaling network, and may have applications in the manufacturing of salt-tolerant tomato. SlMBP11 plays an active role as a stress-responsive TF in the positive regulation of salt stress tolerance utilizing an ABA-independent signaling network and may have significant applications in salt-tolerant tomato design [83]. Overexpression of the rice OsMADS25 gene in Arabidopsis enhanced salinity tolerance compared to the wild type. The MADS-box transcription factor OsMADS25 belongs to the ANR1 clade induced by NO3− and plays a crucial role in rice root development [84]. MADS-box TFs are involved in stress reactions. The SlMBP8 gene containing a MADS-box factor has been cloned from tomato after being expressed in the presence of high salinity, methyl-jasmonic acid, temperature, dehydration, and wounding [85]. SlMBP8 was downregulated by indole-3-acidic acid (IAA), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), and ABA. SlMBP8 acts as a negative stress-responsive TF in high-salinity and drought stress signaling pathways and may have important applications in the engineering of salt and drought-tolerant tomato [85] (Figure 4, Table 1).

2.9. MYB

Arabidopsis AtMYB60 is an R2R3-MYB gene expressed in guard cells that is negatively modulated during drought and involved in regulating stomatal movements. The mutant with a T-DNA insertion of ATMYB60 showed a reduction in the stomatal opening, and the mutation’s effects on water loss and transpiration rate during drought stress [86]. Constructive expression of the rice cold-inducible OsMYB4 gene in transgenic Arabidopsis plants increased under drought and cold stress and was likely due to the constitutive activation of several stress-inducible pathways. OsMYB4 gene expression enhanced the stress response in apples [87]. The GmMYB84 TF from soybean, induced by drought, salt, and ABA, plays a crucial role in ROS homeostasis and control of the abiotic stress response in plants [88]. GmMYB84 overexpression in soybean enhanced drought stress resistance by increasing the ROS and antioxidant enzyme content, including SOD, POD, and CAT.
Moreover, overexpression led to improved primary growth, high survival rates, and reduced dehydration under drought stress [88]. OSMYB55 overexpression in maize shows increased plant biomass and reduced leaf damage caused by high-temperature exposure, likely due to increased stress-responsive gene expression [89]. Moreover, it shows reduced initial leaf damage when the chlorophyll content decreases slightly, probably associated with OsMYB55-mediated stress tolerance [89]. Similarly, GaMYB62L expression in Arabidopsis produced improved drought resistance feedback [90]. GaMYB85 also encouraged drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis by increasing chlorophyll and free proline material with relatively higher water content [91].
A fascinating novel TF of Arabidopsis, AtMYBL, had two estimated DNA-binding domains. The physiological role of R-R-type MYB TFs is unknown in plants [92]. The Arabidopsis AtMYBL gene promotes leaf senescence and decreases salt tolerance compared to wild-type and ATMYBL RNA interference lines during subsequent seed growth when subsequent seed growth high-density plants were under stress. ATMBL regulates stress sensitivity in protein development [92]. Campos et al. [93] described a salt-sensitive ars1 mutant phenotype from a single T-DNA insertion in the ARS1 gene, encoding the R1-MYB TF in tomatoes. The T-DNA insertion ars1 mutant accumulated high Na+ in the leaves, accompanied by reduced stomatal conductance and limited transpiration rate, confirming the role of the ARS1 gene in stomatal movement under salt stress. The sweet cherry PacMYBA gene is generally localized to the nucleus and might be induced by ABA. After overexpression of this gene, transgenic Arabidopsis decreased osmotic capability and increased the peroxidase and proline content in response to salt stress [94].
Moreover, GmMYB12B2 was not induced by the ABA and drought stress response. However, its expression in Arabidopsis caused tolerance to salt stress [95]. Similarly, the MYB TF isolated from wheat had a role in mediating abiotic stress responses. In addition, more recently, TaSIM gene overexpression in wheat induced significantly longer roots and further increased the expression level of ABA-dependent (RD22) and ABA-independent (RD29A) signaling [96]. This TF is associated with the regulatory system in response to biotic and abiotic stress in plants. The R2R3-MYB factor in L. purpureus has also been recognized [97]. LpMYB1 overexpression in Arabidopsis improved the regeneration of gene transference to drought and salt stress and the capability of genetically modified seedlings in NaCl or ABA. LpMYB1 is a drought-dependent R2R3-MYB factor that builds salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis [97]. MYB genes, especially MdoMYB121, are enhanced by many stressors. MdoMYB121 overexpression improved resistance to high salinity, cold stress, and drought in apple plants and transgenic tomatoes. MdoMYB121 can be used as a target gene in genetic engineering to recover plant tolerance to different abiotic stressors [98]. As a stress protein kinase, the surface protein of MPK3, the Arabidopsis TF, is involved in re-programming pre-stressed MYB44. MYB44 is classified as a phosphorylation-based positive controller of salt stress signaling. MYB44 conveys a putative transcriptional repression motif. Overexpression of an MYB44-REP combination traded salt and drought tolerance [99]. MYB-type proteins take part in various stress responses. The TaMYB19 gene encodes an R2R3-type MYB protein activated by multiple abiotic stressors in wheat. The expression patterns of TaMYB19-A, TaMYB19-B, and TaMYB19-D were comparable under various stress conditions. The TaMYB19 protein has an essential role in plant stress tolerance, and adjusting the outflow of this protein may enhance abiotic resilience in crop plants [100]. Plant MYB interpretation factors control various natural processes, for example, separation, improvement, and abiotic stress response.
BplMYB46, an MYB gene from Betula platyphylla (birch), is associated with abiotic stress and auxiliary divider biosynthesis. BplMYB46 enhances salt and osmotic resilience by influencing gene expression, including SOD, POD, and P5CS, to increase reactive oxygen species scavenging and proline. Additionally, BplMYB46 may help control stomatal openings to diminish water loss [101]. Transgenic BplMYB46-overexpressing birch plants showed enhanced salt and osmotic pressure resistance, higher lignin cellulose content, and lower hemicellulose content than the control their potential application in the forestry industry [101] (Table 1). OsMYB511 is a TF in rice that controls abiotic stress responses and has been activated by exogenous ABA, high temperature, and osmotic pressure. Expression analysis of the OsMYB511 gene showed high expression at an earlier development stage in rice panicles [102]. A co-articulation investigation uncovered an extra two MYB qualities co-communicated with OsMYB511, suggesting that they coordinate direct pressure reactions in rice [102]. OsMYB3R-2 works in both stress and developmental procedures in rice. Transgenic plants overexpressing OsMYB3R-2 showed improved cold resistance. The cold treatment initiated the outflow of OsMYB3R-2, which encodes a functioning translation factor, and was bound to a mitosis-particular activator cis-component [103]. GmMYB118 is a soybean gene located in the nucleus that improves tolerance to drought and salt stress by reducing ROS and MDA content and regulates the expression of several stress-associated genes in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. After CRISPR, the GmMYB118 gene may improve salt stress tolerance in transgenic plants because CRISPR transformed plants displayed reduced drought and salt tolerance compared to control plants [104]. In barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), transcripts of HvMYB1 are upregulated by drought stress in leaves and roots and acting as a mediator of ABA action. Transgenic barley plants that overexpress HvMYB1 enhanced relative water content and reduced water loss rate, stomatal conductance, and ROS accumulation by constitutively higher ROS scavengers as APX and GPX under drought stress [105].

2.10. NAC

The rice gene OsNAC006 is located in the nucleus, and the knock-out of this gene using the CRISPR-Cas9 system is essential for drought resistance. It is regulated by H2O2, ABA, heat, cold, and drought treatment. The knockout of OsNAC006 caused enhanced sensitivity to drought and heat tolerance in rice, which lowered chlorophyll levels, reduced SOD and POD enzyme activities, and increased MDA content [106]. In addition, under the influence of a predominantly root-expressed promoter, TaRNAC1 improved dehydration resistance, yielding higher biomass, grain production, and root length [107]. TaRNAC1 is a constitutively and pre-dominantly root-expressed NAC TF. TaRNAC1 overexpression in wheat roots conferred increased root length and biomass, drought tolerance, and improved grain yield under water limitation [107]. MfNACsa, a Medicago falcata lipid-anchored NAC gene, positively regulates plant drought stress resistance by differential expression of oxidation-related, lipid-transported, and localization-related genes [108]. In transgenic tobacco, SlNAC35 is a protein used to control biotic and abiotic stress resistance. Expression of the SlNAC35 gene is prompted by salt stress, drought stress, signaling molecules, and bacterial pathogens, suggesting its participation in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stimuli [109]. After overexpression of the SlNAC35 gene, advanced root development occurs under drought and salt stress [109]. ABA and osmotic stressors, such as drought and high salt, promoted OsNAC2, an individual from the NAC translation factor family. OsNAC2 overexpression reduced high salt and drought tolerance [110]. A microarray showed that numerous ABA-subordinate pressure-related qualities were downregulated in OsNAC2 overexpression lines. OsNAC2 directs both abiotic stress reactions and ABA-intervened rice reactions and acts at the intersection between ABA and abiotic stress pathways [110]. NAC proteins are the most significant TFs, and NAC proteins contribute to abiotic stress and plant development regulation. Overexpression of TsNAC1, cloned from the halophyte Thellungiella halophila, enhanced abiotic stress resistance, particularly salt stress, in T. halophila and Arabidopsis thaliana and delayed plant development [111]. The TsNAC1 gene is a crucial TF in abiotic stress resistance and growth [111]. GmNAC5 is a member of the NAM subfamily and is involved in controlling the shoot apical meristem, hormone signaling, and stress responses in soybean [94]. In addition, GmNAC5 is stimulated by mechanical wounding and high salt and cold treatments but is not activated by ABA [112]. RsNACs involving layer-bound individuals have been recognized in the radish genome. The RsNAC023 and RsNAC080 genes reacted to all stressors, except ABA; however, RsNAC145 reacted more to heat, salt, and drought. NAC is a strong candidate gene for upcoming studies on improving abiotic stress tolerance in radish [113]. Overexpression of ANAC069 induced a lower proline content and ROS targeting ability, resulting in enhanced salt and osmotic stress tolerance [114]. After binding to C[A/G]CG[T/G] sequences in the ANAC069 gene promoter in Arabidopsis, the improvement of proline biosynthesis (P5CS) and antioxidant (POD, SOD, and GST) genes under salt stress was observed [96]. The rice ONAC022 gene was localized in the nucleus, modulating an ABA-mediated pathway, and a higher survival ratio and less Na+ accumulation were observed in roots and shoots in response to drought and salt stress [115].

2.11. Trihelix

One of the leading trihelix TF families is the trihelix family TF, also known as the GT factor. Tea (Camellia sinensis) genes CsGT1-3 and CsGT2-1 belong to the trihelix TFs, which are highly expressed under various abiotic stressors. Salt stress increased the expression of CsGT1-3 and CsGT2-1 genes [116]. The soybean GmGT-2A and GmGT-2B genes are ABA-sensitive trihelix TFs; they increased plant tolerance to abiotic stress when expressed in Arabidopsis [117]. The overexpression of GmGT-2A and GmGT-2B enhanced resistance to freezing, drought, and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis [117]. The trihelix family genes are involved in light and other developmental processes, but their characteristics are generally unclear. The BnSIP1-1 protein is focused on the nucleus. Overexpression of BnSIP1-1 enhanced seed germination when exposed to osmotic stress, ABA, and salt. BnSIP1-1 is likely involved in ABA signaling and synthesis and osmotic and salt stress responses [118]. A rice OsGTγ family member, OsGTγ-2, directly interacted with the GT-1 element in the OsRAV2 promoter. OsGTγ-2 specifically targeted the nucleus and was mainly expressed in roots, sheaths, stems, and seeds, and it was induced by salinity, osmotic and oxidative stresses, and ABA [119]. Arabidopsis thaliana AtGT2L and rice OsGTγ-1 were induced by salt, drought, cold stress, and ABA treatment [120]. The function of AST1 was characterized in response to salt and osmotic stress and showed transcriptional activation activity; its expression was induced by osmotic and salt stress [121].

2.12. WHIRLY

WHIRLY is a TF family involved in biotic and abiotic stress responses, but its biological function remains unclear. SlWHY2, an individual from the WHIRLY family, was isolated from tomatoes [122]. Overexpression of the SlWHY2 gene in tobacco improved drought stress tolerance, controlled mitochondrial gene transcription, and balanced mitochondrial metabolism. The SlWHY2 gene is a positive controller for plants exposed to biotic and abiotic stress [122].

2.13. WOX

WOX (WUSCHEL-related homeobox) is a plant TF linked to plant development and stress responses. The paper mulberry BpWUS gene is an ABA-responsive gene associated with the stem, root, and apical bud. BpWOX5 and BpWOX7 controlled the root tip, and three BpWOXs controlled leaf enlargement [123]. BpWOX9 and BpWOX10 were promoted by indole-3-acidic (IAA) or jasmonic (JA), while five phytohormones repressed BpWOX2. Most BpWOX genes were receptive to drought, salt, cold, and cadmium (CdCl2) [123]. The rice WOX13 gene belongs to the WOX subfamily of TFs and is ABA-responsive, essential for flower improvement, contains proteins, and is involved in drought and salinity stress. OsWOX13 was involved in the regulation of vegetative organs, flowers, and seeds. OsWOX13 caused early flowering and stress responses. OsWOX13 overexpression resulted in early flowering and showed an extensive spectrum of effects on biological processes, such as abiotic and biotic stress, after drought and salinity stress [124].

2.14. WRKY

WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 are three WRKY TFs in Arabidopsis that are correlated with drought response and BR-mediated plant development. The mutants of wrky46, wrky54, and wrky70 had altered plant development, controlled drought, and promoted BR-mediating gene expression and drought response genes in RNA sequencing analysis [125]. Sun et al. [126] found that the activated expression of the group III member protein AtWRKY53 modulated stomatal movement, improving starch metabolism and functioning as osmoregulation by decreasing H2O2 content, contributing negatively to controlling dehydration tolerance. Likewise, in rice, OsWRKY47 imparted drought stress tolerance [127]. OsWRKY47 expression was caused by drought stress in plants, and their mutants showed higher susceptibility to drought and decreased yield, whereas OsWRKY47 plants were more tolerant [127]. Expression of the Glycine soja GsWRKY20 gene improved drought tolerance and modified ABA signaling. After GsWRKY20 overexpression in Arabidopsis, plants had reduced sensitivity to ABA, stomatal closure during seed germination, and early seedling growth, exhibiting a greater tolerance to drought stress [128]. Past microarray investigations of Arabidopsis roots recognized two WRKY TFs (WRKY25 and WRKY33) among the transcripts that expanded NaCl treatment. WRKY33 is not flexible in any situation affecting WRKY25 null mutants’ stress, indicating functional redundancy with null mutants and two-fold mutants and promoting NaCl sensitivity. When WRKY25 or WRKY33 were overexpressed in Arabidopsis, plants had NaCl tolerance [129]. Likewise, in cotton, the GhWRKY6 gene was observed to target ROS and stimulate the ABA signaling pathways, consequently improving salt tolerance in Arabidopsis.
In contrast, GhWRKY6 gene silencing by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) in cotton improved susceptibility to abiotic stress [130]. In addition, a recent study found that SlWRKY3 protein overexpression encouraged physiological indices correlated with photosynthesis, increased leaf aggregation of K+ and Ca2+, and decreased sodium and proline content [131]. WRKY TFs are linked with biotic and abiotic stress in plant reactions. Arabidopsis TFs WRKY18, WRKY40, and WRKY60 cooperate functionally and physically in plant resistance responses [132]. The three WRKY genes are associated with plant reactions to ABA and abiotic stress. Overexpression of distinctive mutants for WRKY genes showed that WRKY18 and WRKY60 positively affected plant ABA to restrict seed germination and root development [132]. WRKY18 and WRKY60 genes were affected by abiotic stress in germination, plant sensitivity to ABA, and growth assays. WRKY18 and WRKY40 were quickly induced after ABA treatment, whereas WRKY60 was not rapidly induced [113].
Furthermore, the maize ZmWRKY17 gene in Arabidopsis decreased ABA sensitivity, as shown by healthy green cotyledons and longer roots in response to exogenous ABA application, and increased plant sensitivity to salinity stress [133]. GhWRKY41 [134] and GhWRKY68 are two other cotton WRKY genes that positively regulate salt and drought stress resistance by affecting physiological indices, including stomatal closer and ROS accumulation in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana [135]. MtWRKY76 induced abiotic stress-responsive genes associated with the ASR protein in M. truncatula, resulting in increased drought and salt tolerance [136]. Genetic research in soybean revealed that GmWRKY27 improves salt and drought tolerance, which was confirmed by the proline and ROS content [137]. The sweet potato IbWRKY2 gene was found in the nucleus, and NaCl and ABA induced its expression. In addition, Arabidopsis overexpressing IbWRKY2 demonstrated improved drought and salt tolerance. The content of ABA and proline and the activity of SOD were higher in transgenic plants after drought and salt treatments, while the contents of MDA and H2O2 were lower [138]. Similarly, ZmWRKY58 also played an essential role in response to drought and salt stress in rice. Overexpression of ZmWRKY58 in rice resulted in delayed germination and inhibited post-germination development [139]. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), SlWRKY8 protein was localized to the nucleus, and a positive regulator in plant immunity against pathogen infection and plant response to drought and salt stresses through ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. Overexpression of SlWRKY8 promoted the activities of ROS-scavenging enzymes and proline contents [140]. In tomatoes, the transcript of SlWRKY81 is involved in the regulation of ABA-mediated and acts as a negative regulator for drought tolerance by modulating stomatal movement. Overexpression of SlWRKY81 enhances tomato tolerance to drought and promotes ABA content, stomatal closure, and accumulation of H2O2 in the guard cells [141]. Similarly, Ahammed et al. [142,143] reported that the SlWRKY81 TF inhibits stomatal closure by reducing nitric oxide accumulation in the guard cells and is closely associated with an increased proline content in tomato leaves compared with non-silenced plants of tomatoes under drought.

2.15. YABBY

YABBY plays a vital monitoring role in lateral organ development. The pineapple AcYABBY gene, after overexpression in Arabidopsis, displayed a small root under NaCl treatment, representing the adverse effect of AcYABBY4 on plant resistance to salt stress [144]. GmYABBY10 might be a negative regulator of plant tolerance to drought and salt stress. The GmYABBY10 protein was mainly localized in the membranes and cytoplasm, which are more sensitive to drought, salt, and ABA stress. GmYABBY10 played an essential role in drought and salt resistance in Arabidopsis, and wild-type seeds had higher than GmYABBY10 transgenic seeds under both PEG and NaCl treatment. Simultaneously, wild-type seedlings’ root length and root surface were more extensive than GmYABBY10 transgenic seedlings [145].

2.16. Zinc Finger

The Chrysanthemum morifolium BBX24 gene encoding a zinc finger TF was mainly associated with flowering time and stress tolerance. Transgenic lines with suppressed expression of Cm-BBX24 (Cm-BBX24-RNAi) showed early flowering compared to wild-type plants and exhibited decreased tolerance to drought and freezing stress in chrysanthemum, in part, by influencing GA biosynthesis [146]. The gene from the CCCHZF rice family, OsC3H10, primarily expressed in plants, consequently causes a rapid decline during seed imbibition; moreover, the expression of OsC3H10 was induced by drought high salinity and ABA [147]. OsC3H10 regulated drought resistance by modulating stress-related gene expression involving various drought-tolerant pathways. However, root-specific overexpression of OsC3H10 was inadequate to cause drought tolerance, whereas the plant overall had increased drought tolerance [147]. Overexpression of the zinc finger protein ZAT18, expressed in the roots, silica, and rosette plants, resulted in drought tolerance in Arabidopsis, with more minor leaf water losses, lower ROS quality, higher leaf water content, and higher antioxidant enzyme activity after drought treatment relative to the wild-type [148] (Figure 2, Table 1). Several genes of zinc finger proteins are involved in playing essential roles in salt stress. The Zoysia japonica ZjZFN1 gene is a zinc finger TF that plays a critical role in improved seed germination and enhanced plant salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant variation also improved with salinity stress with improved green cotyledons and growth status under salinity stress. ZjZFN1-overexpressing plants revealed that ZjZFN1 might be a transcriptional activator of changeable stress-responsive pathways, including α-linolenic acid metabolism, phenylalanine metabolism, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways [149]. The bread wheat TaCHP gene belongs to the zinc finger family, which is essentially expressed in the roots of seedlings at the three-leaf stage. CHP was reduced by the imposition of salinity or drought stress and the exogenous supply of ABA [150] (Figure 3, Table 1). Using CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing in rice (OsDST), the DST gene increased drought and salinity stress tolerance and improved crop production. The DST mutant was first produced in rice, and stomatal density was associated with reducing stomatal development genes in the DST mutant [151] (Figure 4, Table 1).

2.17. Other

AITRs, as a family of novel TFs, play a role in regulating plant responses to ABA, drought, and salinity stress. Using CRISPR/Cas9 to target six AITR genes (aitr123456) reduced sensitivity to ABA and enhanced tolerance to drought and salinity in the Arabidopsis mutant, but plant growth, development, and response to pathogen infection remained unaffected in the mutants [152].

3. Conclusions and Future Research Priorities

Plants cannot escape environmental pressures due to their sessile existence, but they have developed strategies to counteract the adverse effects of stress. Plant endogenous development programs, for example, use physiological and metabolic modifications to help plants cope with unfavorable environmental factors, including salinity and drought. Plant production and productivity may be negatively impacted by the failure to respond to adverse environmental factors, resulting in a substantial reduction in yield. This review covered the current knowledge on drought and salt stress genes and focused on the various TFs involved in drought and salt stress, showing the apparent link with ABA-dependent and -independent pathways. Tremendous improvements have been made to understand the molecular mechanisms controlling drought and salinity stress tolerance in recent years. Several regulatory pathways have been identified for drought and salinity tolerance in different plants (apple, Arabidopsis, chrysanthemum, finger millet, maize, pineapple, rapeseed, rice, soybean, tea, tomato, and wheat) using genetic engineering and CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing.
Similar to Hussain et al. [42], we revealed complex genetic regulatory networks (Figure 5) based on examining current drought and salinity stress tolerance knowledge in Arabidopsis and other plant species. Several genetic and signaling pathways that determine drought and salinity stress tolerance are well known, including AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, DREB, GATA, HD-Zip, Homeo-box, MADS-box, MYB, NAC, Tri-helix, WHIRLY, WOX, WRKY, YABBY, and zinc finger (Table 1). Interestingly, many of these genes have a conserved function in drought and salinity stress, and their pathways are ABA-dependent, -independent, -induced, -responsive, -mediated, and -sensitive. In addition, many of these genes have similar functions in drought and salinity stress, which belong to ABA-dependent, -independent, -inducible, -responsive, and -sensitive pathways that regulate the cell and ROS scavenging. Their TFs are bHLH, bZIP, Homeo-box, DREB, MYB, NAC, HD-Zip, MADS-box, WOX, and WRKY. More importantly, many of the drought and salinity stress-responsive genes have expression activity and additional effects on other organs, such as flowering time (Cm-BBX24) and yield (OsCML16, OsERF71, TaHDZipI-5, OsTF1L, and Oshox4), indicating a cooperative regulation. These results strongly suggest the conserved function of these genes in regulating drought and salinity stress tolerance among different plant species. They can be targeted for the molecular improvement of drought, and salinity stress tolerance through genetic engineering and genome editing approaches, such as CRISPR/Cas.
Most importantly, with these approaches to TFs, the future development of drought- and salinity-resistant plants with improved yields and reduced off-target effects will become a reality. In the future, a combination of modern biotechnologies, such as microarray, proteomic genome editing, genomics, genome-wide association, -omics, and bioinformatics, will accelerate the identification of the regulators of drought and salinity stress responses and different genes and signaling pathways. In conclusion, it is necessary to collaborate to convey this science-based benefit to farmers to deliver a food supply adequate to eliminate world hunger. The link between transcription and phytohormones was further identified, as well as their signaling pathways. Candidate genes that regulate and target different phytohormones can consequently mitigate drought and salinity stress. Tolerance to these stressors in crop breeding is mainly unknown.

Author Contributions

J.W. and R.Z. conceptualized and designed the structure of a manuscript. Q.H. and M.A. wrote the manuscript. Q.H., R.K. and S.F. collected the drought and salinity genes from the published literature. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was financed by the National Forestry and Grassland Technological Innovation Program for Young Topnotch Talents (2020132604), the Key Research Program of Zhejiang Province (2018C02004), and the Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111 Project D18008).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No supplementary data is available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABA: Abscisic Acid; AP2/ERF, APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSIVE FACTOR; AREB/ABF, RESPONSIVE ELEMENT BINDING FACTORS; bHLH, basic/helix-loop-helix; BR, brassinosteroid; bZIP, Basic leucine zipper; CBFs, C-repeat Binding Proteins; CBLs, Calcineurin-B-like proteins; CDPKs, Calcium-dependent protein kinases; CRISPRs)/Cas, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats; ChIP-seq, Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing; CIPK, CBL-interacting protein kinase; DAP-seq, DNA affinity purification sequencing; DREBs, Dehydration Responsive Element Binding Proteins; GRNs, Gene regulatory networks; H2O2, Hydrogen Peroxide; HD-Zip, Homeodomain-leucine zipper; MAPK, Mitogen-activated protein kinase; MDA, malondialdehyde; PKs, Protein kinases; POD/POX, Peroxidase; PP2Cs, Protein phosphatase 2Cs; RNS, reactive nitrogen species; PPs, protein phosphatases ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species; SA, salicylic acid; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; TALENs, transcriptional activator-like nucleases; TFs, transcription factors; WOX, WUSCHEL-related homeobox; WT, Wild-type; ZFNs, zinc-finger nucleases.

References

  1. He, M.; He, C.Q.; Ding, N.Z. Abiotic stresses: General defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 871, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Cramer, G.R.; Urano, K.; Delrot, S.; Pezzotti, M.; Shinozaki, K. Effects of abiotic stress on plants: A systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Waqas, M.A.; Kaya, C.; Riaz, A.; Farooq, M.; Nawaz, I.; Wilkes, A.; Li, Y. Potential mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants induced by thiourea. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Meena, K.K.; Sorty, A.M.; Bitla, U.M.; Choudhary, K.; Gupta, P.; Pareek, A.; Singh, D.P.; Prabha, R.; Sahu, P.K.; Gupta, V.K.; et al. Abiotic stress responses and microbe-mediated mitigation in plants: The omics strategies. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 2016, 167, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Golldack, D.; Li, C.; Mohan, H.; Probst, N. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: Unraveling the signaling networks. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Khan, R.; Zhou, P.; Ma, X.; Zhou, L.; Wu, Y.; Ullah, Z.; Wang, S. Transcriptome profiling, biochemical and physiological analyses provide new insights towards drought tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum L. Genes 2019, 10, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chantre Nongpiur, R.; Singla-Pareek, L.; Pareek, A. Genomics approaches for improving salinity stress tolerance in crop plants. Curr. Genom. 2016, 17, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Song, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, W.H. A novel Medicago truncatula HD-Zip gene, MtHB2, is involved in abiotic stress responses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2012, 80, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, Y.; Ma, Q.; Jin, X.; Peng, X.; Liu, J.; Deng, L.; Yan, H.; Sheng, L.; Jiang, H.; Cheng, B. A novel maize homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-Zip) i gene, Zmhdz10, positively regulates drought and salt tolerance in both rice and arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1142–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Gupta, P.; Nutan, K.K.; Singla-pareek, S.L.; Pareek, A. Abiotic stresses cause differential regulation of alternative splice forms of GATA transcription factor in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zhao, P.; Cui, R.; Xu, P.; Wu, J.; Mao, J.L.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, C.Z.; Yu, L.H.; Xiang, C.B. ATHB17 enhances stress tolerance by coordinating photosynthesis associated nuclear gene and ATSIG5 expression in response to abiotic stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Organization of cis -acting regulatory elements in osmotic- and cold-stress- responsive promoters. Trends Plant Sci. 2005, 10, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kazuo, S.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: Differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000, 3, 217–223. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ahn, T.S.; Ka, J.O.; Lee, G.H.; Song, H.G. Microcosm study for revegetation of barren land with wild plants by some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 17, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 781–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Tuteja, N. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2007, 2, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Yang, W.; Liu, X.D.; Chi, X.J.; Wu, C.A.; Li, Y.Z.; Song, L.L.; Liu, X.M.; Wang, Y.F.; Wang, F.W.; Zhang, C.; et al. Dwarf apple MbDREB1 enhances plant tolerance to low temperature, drought, and salt stress via both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. Planta 2011, 233, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jakab, G.; Ton, J.; Flors, V.; Zimmerli, L.; Métraux, J.P.; Mauch-Mani, B. Enhancing Arabidopsis salt and drought stress tolerance by chemical priming for its abscisic acid responses. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ali, S.; Hayat, K.; Iqbal, A.; Xie, L. Implications of abscisic acid in the drought stress tolerance of plants. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, K.B. Transcriptional regulation in plants: The importance of combinatorial control. Plant Physiol. 1998, 118, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yanagisawa, S. Transcription factors in rants: Physiological functions and regulation of expression. J. Plant Res. 1998, 111, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Joshi, R.; Wani, S.H.; Singh, B.; Bohra, A.; Dar, Z.A.; Lone, A.A.; Pareek, A.; Singla-Pareek, S.L. Transcription factors and plants response to drought stress: Current understanding and future directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Rabara, R.C.; Tripathi, P.; Rushton, P.J. The potential of transcription factor-based genetic engineering in improving crop tolerance to drought. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2014, 18, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Shao, H.; Tang, X. Recent advances in utilizing transcription factors to improve plant abiotic stress tolerance by transgenic technology. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Tripathi, R.K.; Wilkins, O. Single cell gene regulatory networks in plants: Opportunities for enhancing climate change stress resilience. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 2006–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bartlett, A.; O’Malley, R.C.; Huang, S.S.C.; Galli, M.; Nery, J.R.; Gallavotti, A.; Ecker, J.R. Mapping genome-wide transcription-factor binding sites using DAP-seq. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 1659–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Sun, Y.; Oh, D.-H.; Duan1, L.; Prashanth Ramachandran, A.R.; Bartlett, A.; Dassanayake, M.; Dinneny, J.R. Divergence in a stress-associated gene regulatory network underlies differential 2 growth control in the Brassicaceae family. Biorxiv Prepr. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zafar, S.A.; Zaidi, S.S.E.A.; Gaba, Y.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Dhankher, O.P.; Li, X.; Mansoor, S.; Pareek, A. Engineering abiotic stress tolerance via CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Erffelinck, M.L.; Ribeiro, B.; Perassolo, M.; Pauwels, L.; Pollier, J.; Storme, V.; Goossens, A. A user-friendly platform for yeast two-hybrid library screening using next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Aleman, F.; Yazaki, J.; Lee, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Kim, A.Y.; Li, Z.; Kinoshita, T.; Ecker, J.R.; Schroeder, J.I. An ABA-increased interaction of the PYL6 ABA receptor with MYC2 Transcription Factor: A putative link of ABA and JA signaling. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Latchman, D.S. Transcription factors: An overview. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1997, 29, 1305–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wärnmark, A.; Treuter, E.; Wright, A.P.H.; Gustafsson, J.Å. Activation functions 1 and 2 of nuclear receptors: Molecular strategies for transcriptional activation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2003, 17, 1901–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khan, S.A.; Li, M.Z.; Wang, S.M.; Yin, H.J. Revisiting the role of plant transcription factors in the battle against abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Torres, M.A.; Dangl, J.L. Functions of the respiratory burst oxidase in biotic interactions, abiotic stress and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cutler, S.R.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Finkelstein, R.R.; Abrams, S.R. Abscisic acid: Emergence of a core signaling network. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 651–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Hu, W.; Huang, C.; Deng, X.; Zhou, S.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Ma, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Wang, Y.; et al. TaASR1, a transcription factor gene in wheat, confers drought stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 1449–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nakashima, K.; Ito, Y.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Gao, F.; Zhou, J.; Deng, R.Y.; Zhao, H.X.; Li, C.L.; Chen, H.; Suzuki, T.; Park, S.U.; Wu, Q. Overexpression of a tartary buckwheat R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene, FtMYB9, enhances tolerance to drought and salt stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis. J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 214, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cominelli, E.; Galbiati, M.; Tonelli, C. Transcription factors controlling stomatal movements and drought tolerance. Transcription 2010, 1, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Upadhyay, R.K.; Gupta, A.; Ranjan, S.; Singh, R.; Pathre, U.V.; Nath, P.; Sane, A.P. The EAR motif controls the early flowering and senescence phenotype mediated by over-expression of SlERF36 and is partly responsible for changes in stomatal density and photosynthesis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Hussain, Q.; Shi, J.; Scheben, A.; Zhan, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, G.; Yan, G.; King, G.J.; Edwards, D.; Wang, H. Genetic and signalling pathways of dry fruit size: Targets for genome editing-based crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1124–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mishra, S.; Phukan, U.J.; Tripathi, V.; Singh, D.K. PsAP2 an AP2/ERF family transcription factor from Papaver somniferum enhances abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 89, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Licausi, F.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Perata, P. APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: Mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rashid, M.; Guangyuan, H.; Guangxiao, Y.; Hussain, J.; Xu, Y. AP2/ERF transcription factor in rice: Genome-wide anvas and yntenic relationships between monocots and udicots. Evol. Bioinform. 2012, 2012, 321–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jung, H.; Chung, P.J.; Park, S.H.; Redillas, M.C.F.R.; Kim, Y.S.; Suh, J.W.; Kim, J.K. Overexpression of OsERF48 causes regulation of OsCML16, a calmodulin-like protein gene that enhances root growth and drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1295–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Lee, D.K.; Jung, H.; Jang, G.; Jeong, J.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Ha, S.H.; Do Choi, Y.; Kim, J.K. Overexpression of the OsERF71 transcription factor alters rice root structure and drought resistance. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Aharoni, A.; Dixit, S.; Jetter, R.; Thoenes, E.; Van Arkel, G.; Pereira, A. The SHINE clade of AP2 domain transcription factors activates wax biosynthesis, alters cuticle properties, and confers drought tolerance when overexpressed in arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 2463–2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Liu, D.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Ye, J.; Guo, Z. The rice ERF transcription factor OsERF922 negatively regulates resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and salt methylation and chromatin patterning tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3899–3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Xu, Z.-S.; Xia, L.-Q.; Chen, M.; Cheng, X.-G.; Zhang, R.-Y. Isolation and molecular characterization of the Triticum aestivum L. ethylene-responsive factor 1 (TaERF1) that increases multiple stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 1, 719–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Le Hir, R.; Castelain, M.; Chakraborti, D.; Moritz, T.; Dinant, S.; Bellini, C. AtbHLH68 transcription factor contributes to the regulation of ABA homeostasis and drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 160, 312–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Yao, P.F.; Li, C.L.; Zhao, X.R.; Li, M.F.; Zhao, H.X.; Guo, J.Y.; Cai, Y.; Chen, H.; Wu, Q. Overexpression of a tartary buckwheat gene, FtbHLH3, enhances drought/oxidative stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Dong, Y.; Wang, C.; Han, X.; Tang, S.; Liu, S.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. A novel bHLH transcription factor PebHLH35 from Populus euphratica confers drought tolerance through regulating stomatal development, photosynthesis and growth in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 450, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Liu, H.; Yang, Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L. Transcription factor TabHLH49 positively regulates dehydrin WZY2 gene expression and enhances drought stress tolerance in wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chen, H.C.; Hsieh-Feng, V.; Liao, P.C.; Cheng, W.H.; Liu, L.Y.; Yang, Y.W.; Lai, M.H.; Chang, M.C. The function of OsbHLH068 is partially redundant with its homolog, AtbHLH112, in the regulation of the salt stress response but has opposite functions to control flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 94, 531–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chen, H.C.; Cheng, W.H.; Hong, C.Y.; Chang, Y.S.; Chang, M.C. The transcription factor OsbHLH035 mediates seed germination and enables seedling recovery from salt stress through ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways, respectively. Rice 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Jiang, L.; Tian, X.; Li, S.; Fu, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, G. The aabhlh35 transcription factor identified from anthurium andraeanum is involved in cold and drought tolerance. Plants 2019, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Liu, Y.; Ji, X.; Nie, X.; Qu, M.; Zheng, L.; Tan, Z.; Zhao, H.; Huo, L.; Liu, S.; Zhang, B.; et al. Arabidopsis AtbHLH112 regulates the expression of genes involved in abiotic stress tolerance by binding to their E-box and GCG-box motifs. New Phytol. 2015, 207, 692–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Babitha, K.C.; Vemanna, R.S.; Nataraja, K.N.; Udayakumar, M. Overexpression of EcbHLH57 transcription factor from Eleusine coracana L. in tobacco confers tolerance to salt, oxidative and drought stress. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zheng, P.F.; Yang, Y.Y.; Zhang, S.; You, C.X.; Zhang, Z.L.; Hao, Y.J. Identification and functional characterization of MdPIF3 in response to cold and drought stress in Malus domestica. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Qiu, J.; Huang, Z.; Xiang, X.; Xu, W.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Song, L.; Xiao, Y. MfbHLH38, a Myrothamnus flabellifolia bHLH transcription factor, confers tolerance to drought and salinity stresses in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huang, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, X. Overexpression of PtrABF gene, a bZIP transcription factor isolated from Poncirus trifoliata, enhances dehydration and drought tolerance in tobacco via scavenging ROS and modulating expression of stress-responsive genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Yoshida, T.; Fujita, Y.; Sayama, H.; Kidokoro, S.; Maruyama, K.; Mizoi, J. AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 are master transcription factors that cooperatively regulate ABRE-dependent ABA signaling involved in drought stress tolerance and require ABA for full activation. Plant J. 2010, 672–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lu, G.; Gao, C.; Zheng, X.; Han, B. Identification of OsbZIP72 as a positive regulator of ABA response and drought tolerance in rice. Planta 2009, 229, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.; Xia, C.; Zhao, G.; Liu, J.; Jia, J.; Kong, X. A novel wheat bZIP transcription factor, TabZIP60, confers multiple abiotic stress tolerances in transgenic Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant. 2015, 538–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hossain, A.; Cho, J.; Han, M.; Ahn, C.; Jeon, J.; An, G.; Bum, P. The ABRE-binding bZIP transcription factor OsABF2 is a positive regulator of abiotic stress and ABA signaling in rice. J. Plant Physiol. 2010, 167, 1512–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Liu, C.; Mao, B.; Ou, S.; Wang, W.; Liu, L.; Wu, Y.; Chu, C.; Wang, X. OsbZIP71, a bZIP transcription factor, confers salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 19–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Tang, N.; Ma, S.; Zong, W.; Yang, N.; Lv, Y.; Yan, C.; Guo, Z.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Xiang, Y.; et al. MODD mediates deactivation and degradation of OsbZIP46 to negatively regulate ABA signaling and drought resistance in rice. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 2161–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Tolerance, D.; Xiang, Y.; Tang, N.; Du, H.; Ye, H.; Xiong, L. Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity and salinity. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1938–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Zou, M.; Guan, Y.; Ren, H.; Zhang, F.; Chen, F. A bZIP transcription factor, OsABI5, is involved in rice fertility and stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 675–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Lata, C.; Prasad, M. Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 4731–4748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Gujjar, R.S.; Aktar, M.; Singh, M. Transcription factors in abiotic stress tolerance Transcription factors in abiotic stress tolerance. Ind. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 4, 306–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, X.-P.; Tian, A.-G.; Luo, G.-Z.; Gong, Z.-Z.; Zhang, J.-S.; Chen, S.-Y. Soybean DRE-binding transcription factors that are responsive to abiotic stresses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 2012, 1819, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Gupta, K.; Agarwal, K.; Reddy, M.K.; Bhavanath, J. SbDREB2A, an A-2 type DREB transcription factor from extreme halophyte Salicornia brachiata confers abiotic stress tolerance in Escherichia coli. Plant Cell Rep. 2010, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, H.; Wu, T.; Li, Z.; Huang, K.; Kim, N.E.; Ma, Z.; Kwon, S.W.; Jiang, W.; Du, X. OsGATA16, a GATA transcription factor, confers cold tolerance by repressing OsWRKY45–1 at the seedling stage in rice. Rice 2021, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yang, Y.; Luang, S.; Harris, J.; Riboni, M.; Li, Y.; Bazanova, N.; Hrmova, M.; Haefele, S.; Kovalchuk, N.; Lopato, S. Overexpression of the class I homeodomain transcription factor TaHDZipI-5 increases drought and frost tolerance in transgenic wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1227–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Bang, S.W.; Lee, D.K.; Jung, H.; Chung, P.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Do Choi, Y.; Suh, J.W.; Kim, J.K. Overexpression of OsTF1L, a rice HD-Zip transcription factor, promotes lignin biosynthesis and stomatal closure that improves drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 118–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Tang, Y.; Bao, X.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Tan, J.; Yang, M.; Zhang, M.; Dai, R.; Yu, X. A physic nut stress-responsive HD-Zip transcription factor, JcHDZ07, confers enhanced sensitivity to salinity stress in transgenic arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Zhou, W.Q.; Zhou, Y.Q.; He, C.Y.; Mou, B.Q.; Zhou, W. Over-expression of oshox4 enhances drought and salinity tolerance in rice. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2020, 67, 1152–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cao, L.; Yu, Y.; DuanMu, H.; Chen, C.; Duan, X.; Zhu, P.; Chen, R.; Li, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Ding, X. A novel Glycine soja homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-Zip) I gene, Gshdz4, positively regulates bicarbonate tolerance and responds to osmotic stress in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Bhattacharjee, A.; Khurana, J.P.; Jain, M. Characterization of rice homeobox genes, OsHOX22 and OsHOX24, and over-expression of OsHOX24 in transgenic arabidopsis suggest their role in abiotic stress response. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Guo, X.; Chen, G.; Cui, B.; Gao, Q.; Guo, J.E.; Li, A.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Z. Solanum lycopersicum agamous-like MADS-box protein AGL15-like gene, SlMBP11, confers salt stress tolerance. Mol. Breed. 2016, 36, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wu, J.; Yu, C.; Hunag, L.; Wu, M.; Liu, B.; Liu, Y.; Song, G.; Liu, D. Overexpression of MADS—Box transcription factor OsMADS25 enhances salt stress tolerance in rice and arabidopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yin, W.; Hu, Z.; Hu, J.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, X.; Cui, B. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) MADS-box transcription factor SlMBP8 regulates drought, salt tolerance and stress-related genes. Plant Growth Regul. 2017, 83, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cominelli, E.; Galbiati, M.; Vavasseur, A.; Conti, L.; Sala, T.; Vuylsteke, M.; Leonhardt, N.; Dellaporta, S.L.; Tonelli, C. A guard-cell-specific MYB transcription factor regulates stomatal movements and plant drought tolerance. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15, 1196–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pasquali, G.; Biricolti, S.; Locatelli, F.; Baldoni, E.; Mattana, M. Osmyb4 expression improves adaptive responses to drought and cold stress in transgenic apples. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1677–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, N.; Zhang, W.; Qin, M.; Li, S.; Qiao, M.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, F. Drought tolerance conferred in soybean (Glycine max. L.) by GmMYB84, a novel R2R3-MYB transcription factor. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 1764–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Casaretto, J.A.; El-Kereamy, A.; Zeng, B.; Stiegelmeyer, S.M.; Chen, X.; Bi, Y.M.; Rothstein, S.J. Expression of OsMYB55 in maize activates stress-responsive genes and enhances heat and drought tolerance. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Butt, H.I.; Yang, Z.; Chen, E.; Zhao, G.; Gong, Q.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Li, F. Functional characterization of cotton GaMYB62L, a novel R2R3 TF in transgenic arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Butt, H.I.; Yang, Z.; Gong, Q.; Chen, E.; Wang, X.; Zhao, G.; Ge, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, F. GaMYB85, an R2R3 MYB gene, in transgenic Arabidopsis plays an important role in drought tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhang, X.; Ju, H.; Chung, M.; Huang, P.; Ahn, S.; Kim, C.S. The R-R-Type MYB-like transcription factor, AtMYBL, is involved in promoting leaf senescence and modulates an abiotic stress response in arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Campos, J.F.; Cara, B.; Fernando, P.; Pineda, B.; Egea, I.; Flores, F.B. The tomato mutant ars1 (altered response to salt stress 1) identifies an R1-type MYB transcription factor involved in stomatal closure under salt acclimation T-DNA. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2016, 1, 1345–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Shen, X.; Guo, X.; Guo, X.; Zhao, D.; Zhao, W.; Chen, J.; Li, T. PacMYBA, a sweet cherry R2R3-MYB transcription factor, is a positive regulator of salt stress tolerance and pathogen resistance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Li, X.W.; Wang, Y.; Yan, F.; Li, J.W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhai, Y. Overexpression of soybean R2R3-MYB transcription factor, GmMYB12B2, and tolerance to UV radiation and salt stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yu, Y.; Ni, Z.; Chen, Q.; Qu, Y. The wheat salinity-induced R2R3-MYB transcription factor TaSIM confers salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Yao, L.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, X.; Wang, B.; Zhou, P. A R2R3-MYB transcription factor from Lablab purpureus induced by drought increases tolerance to abiotic stress in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2016, 43, 1089–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cao, Z.; Zhang, S.; Wang, R.; Zhang, R.; Hao, Y. Genome wide analysis of the apple MYB transcription factor family allows the identification of MdoMYB121 gene confering abiotic stress tolerance in plants. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Persak, H.; Pitzschke, A. Dominant repression by arabidopsis transcription factor MYB44 causes oxidative damage and hypersensitivity to abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Zhao, G.; Xia, C.; Jia, J.; Liu, X.; Kong, X. Characterization of a wheat R2R3-MYB transcription factor gene, TaMYB19, involved in enhanced abiotic stresses in arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1802–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Guo, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Hu, P.; Wang, Y.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; et al. Expression of the MYB transcription factor gene BplMYB46 affects abiotic stress tolerance and secondary cell wall deposition in Betula platyphylla. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 107–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Huang, P.; Chen, H.; Mu, R.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, H.S.; Huang, J. OsMYB511 encodes a MYB domain transcription activator early regulated by abiotic stress in rice. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 9506–9517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Ma, Q.; Dai, X.; Xu, Y.; Guo, J.; Liu, Y.; Chen, N.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, D.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; et al. Enhanced tolerance to chilling stress in OsMYB3R-2 transgenic rice is mediated by alteration in cell cycle and ectopic expression of stress genes. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 244–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Du, Y.T.; Zhao, M.J.; Wang, C.T.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Liu, Y.W.; Chen, M.; Chen, J.; Zhou, Y.B.; Xu, Z.S.; et al. Identification and characterization of GmMYB118 responses to drought and salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018, 18, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Alexander, R.D.; Wendelboe-Nelson, C.; Morris, P.C. The barley transcription factor HvMYB1 is a positive regulator of drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 142, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, B.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, X.; Han, X.; Yu, D.; Wang, C.; Song, W.; Zheng, X.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Y. Knockout of the OsNAC006 transcription factor causes drought and heat sensitivity in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Chen, D.; Chai, S.; McIntyre, C.L.; Xue, G.P. Overexpression of a predominantly root-expressed NAC transcription factor in wheat roots enhances root length, biomass and drought tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2018, 37, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Duan, M.; Zhang, R.; Zhu, F.; Zhang, Z.; Gou, L.; Wen, J.; Dong, J.; Wang, T. A lipid-anchored NAC transcription factor is translocated into the nucleus and activates glyoxalase i expression during drought stress. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1748–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Wang, G.; Zhang, S.; Ma, X.; Wang, Y.; Kong, F.; Meng, Q. A stress-associated NAC transcription factor ( SlNAC35 ) from tomato plays a positive role in biotic and abiotic stresses A stress-associated NAC transcription factor ( SlNAC35 ) from tomato plays a positive role in biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 158, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Shen, J.; Lv, B.; Luo, L.; He, J.; Mao, C.; Xi, D.; Ming, F. The NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC2 regulates ABA-dependent genes and abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Liu, C.; Wang, B.; Li, Z.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, J. TsNAC1 Is a key transcription factor in abiotic stress resistance and growth 1. Plant Physiol. 2018, 176, 742–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Jin, H.; Xu, G.; Meng, Q.; Huang, F.; Yu, D. Overexpression of the GmNAC2 gene, an NAC transcription factor, reduces GmNAC5, a NAC transcription factor, is a transient response regulator induced by abiotic stress in soybean. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Karanja, B.K.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y. Genome-wide characterization and expression profiling of NAC transcription factor genes under abiotic stresses in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). PeerJ 2017, 5, e4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. He, L.; Shi, X.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Yang, K.; Wang, Y. Arabidopsis ANAC069 binds to C[A/G]CG[T/G] sequences to negatively regulate salt and osmotic stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2017, 93, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, L.; Li, D.; Song, F. Overexpression of a stress-responsive NAC transcription factor gene ONAC022 improves drought and salt tolerance in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Li, H.; Huang, W.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhuang, J. Trihelix family transcription factors in tea plant (Camellia sinensis): Identification, classification, and expression profiles response to abiotic Trihelix family transcription factors in tea plant (Camellia sinensis): Identification, classificati. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2017, 39, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Xie, Z.; Zou, H.; Lei, G.; Wei, W.; Zhou, Q.; Niu, C. Soybean trihelix transcription factors GmGT-2A and GmGT-2B improve plant tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Luo, J.; Tang, S.; Mei, F.; Peng, X.; Li, J.; Li, X. BnSIP1-1, a trihelix family gene, mediates abiotic stress tolerance and ABA signaling in brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Liu, X.; Wu, D.; Shan, T.; Xu, S.; Qin, R.; Li, H.; Negm, M.; Wu, D.; Li, J. The trihelix transcription factor OsGTγ-2 is involved adaption to salt stress in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Xi, J.; Qiu, Y.; Du, L.; Poovaiah, B.W. Plant science plant-specific trihelix transcription factor AtGT2L interacts with calcium/calmodulin and responds to cold and salt stresses. Plant Sci. 2012, 185–186, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Xu, H.; Shi, X.; He, L.; Guo, Y.; Zang, D.; Li, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y. Arabidopsis thaliana trihelix transcription factor AST1 mediates salt and osmotic stress tolerance by binding to a novel AGAG-box and some GT motifs. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 946–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Zhao, S.; Wang, G.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, S.; Kong, F.; Dong, X. Overexpression of tomato WHIRLY protein enhances tolerance to drought stress and resistance to Pseudomonas solanacearum in transgenic tobacco. Biol. Plant. 2018, 62, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Tang, F.; Chen, N.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Y.; He, R.; Peng, X.; Shen, S. Identification and functional divergence analysis of WOX gene family in paper mulberry. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Minh-Thu, P.-T.; Kim, J.S.; Chae, S.; Jun, K.M.; Lee, G.-S.; Kim, D.-E.; Cheong, J.-J.; Song, S.I.; Nahm, B.H.; Kim, Y.-K. Molecules and cells minireview a WUSCHEL homeobox transcription factor, OsWOX13, enhances drought tolerance and triggers early flowering in rice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2018, 41, 781–798. [Google Scholar]
  125. Chen, J.; Nolan, T.M.; Ye, H.; Zhang, M.; Tong, H.; Xin, P.; Chu, J. Arabidopsis WRKY46, WRKY54, and WRKY70 transcription factors are involved in brassinosteroid-regulated plant growth and drought responses. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 1425–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Sun, Y.; Yu, D. Activated expression of AtWRKY53 negatively regulates drought tolerance by mediating stomatal movement. Plant Cell Rep. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Raineri, J.; Wang, S.; Peleg, Z.; Blumwald, E.; Chan, R.L. The rice transcription factor OsWRKY47 is a positive regulator of the response to water deficit stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Luo, X.; Bai, X.; Sun, X.; Zhu, D.; Liu, B.; Ji, W.; Cai, H.; Cao, L.; Wu, J.; Hu, M. Expression of wild soybean WRKY20 in Arabidopsis enhances drought tolerance and regulates ABA signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Jiang, Y.; Deyholos, M.K. Functional characterization of Arabidopsis NaCl-inducible WRKY25 and WRKY33 transcription factors in abiotic stresses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ullah, A.; Sun, H.; Yang, X. A novel cotton WRKY gene, GhWRKY6 -like, improves salt tolerance by activating the ABA signaling pathway and. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 439–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Hichri, I.; Muhovski, Y.; Žižková, E.; Dobrev, P.I.; Gharbi, E.; Franco-zorrilla, J.M.; Lopez-vidriero, I.; Solano, R.; Clippe, A.; Errachid, A.; et al. The solanum lycopersicum WRKY3 transcription factor SlWRKY3 is involved in salt stress tolerance in tomato. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chen, H.; Lai, Z.; Shi, J.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xu, X. Roles of arabidopsis WRKY18, WRKY40 and WRKY60 transcription factors in plant responses to abscisic acid and abiotic stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Cai, R.; Dai, W.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhao, Y. The maize WRKY transcription factor ZmWRKY17 negatively regulates salt stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Planta 2017, 246, 1215–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chu, X.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Lu, W.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Hao, L. The Cotton WRKY gene GhWRKY41 positively regulates salt and drought stress tolerance in transgenic nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Jia, H.; Wang, C.; Wang, F.; Liu, S.; Li, G.; Guo, X. GhWRKY68 reduces resistance to salt and drought in transgenic nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  136. Liu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Dong, J.; Wang, T. Overexpression of MtWRKY76 increases both salt and drought tolerance in Medicago truncatula. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2016, 123, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wang, F.; Chen, H.W.; Li, Q.T.; Wei, W.; Li, W.; Zhang, W.K.; Ma, B.; Bi, Y.D.; Lai, Y.C. GmWRKY27 interacts with GmMYB174 to reduce expression of GmNAC29 for stress tolerance in soybean plants. Plant J. 2015, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Zhu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhai, H.; He, S.; Zhao, N.; Liu, Q. A novel sweetpotato WRKY transcription factor, IBWRKY2, positively regulates drought and salt tolerance in transgenic arabidopsis. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Cai, R.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Y.; Peng, X. Overexpression of a maize WRKY58 gene enhances drought and salt tolerance in transgenic rice. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gao, Y.F.; Liu, J.K.; Yang, F.M.; Zhang, G.Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, L.; Ou, Y.B.; Yao, Y.A. The WRKY transcription factor WRKY8 promotes resistance to pathogen infection and mediates drought and salt stress tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 168, 98–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ahammed, G.J.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhou, G.; Wan, H.; Cheng, Y. Tomato WRKY81 acts as a negative regulator for drought tolerance by modulating guard cell H2O2–mediated stomatal closure. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 171, 103960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ahammed, G.J.; Li, X.; Mao, Q.; Wan, H.; Zhou, G.; Cheng, Y. The SlWRKY81 transcription factor inhibits stomatal closure by attenuating nitric oxide accumulation in the guard cells of tomato under drought. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 172, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ahammed, G.J.; Li, X.; Wan, H.; Zhou, G.; Cheng, Y. SlWRKY81 reduces drought tolerance by attenuating proline biosynthesis in tomato. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 270, 109444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, Z.; Li, G.; Cai, M.; Priyadarshani, S.V.G.N.; Aslam, M.; Zhou, Q.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Qin, Y. Genome-wide analysis of the YABBY transcription factor family in pineapple and functional identification of AcYABBY4 involvement in salt stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Zhao, S.P.; Lu, D.; Yu, T.F.; Ji, Y.J.; Zheng, W.J.; Zhang, S.X.; Chai, S.C.; Chen, Z.Y.; Cui, X.Y. Genome-wide analysis of the YABBY family in soybean and functional identification of GmYABBY10 involvement in high salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 119, 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Yang, Y.; Ma, C.; Xu, Y.; Wei, Q.; Imtiaz, M.; Lan, H.; Gao, S.; Cheng, L.; Wang, M.; Fei, Z.; et al. A zinc finger protein regulates flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance in chrysanthemum by modulating gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 2038–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  147. Seong, S.Y.; Shim, J.S.; Bang, S.W.; Kim, J.K. Overexpression of osc3h10, a ccch-zinc finger, improves drought tolerance in rice by regulating stress-related genes. Plants 2020, 9, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Yin, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Quan, W.; Yang, L.; Wang, Q.; Chan, Z. The arabidopsis Cys2/His2 zinc finger transcription factor ZAT18 is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to drought stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2991–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Teng, K.; Tan, P.; Guo, W.; Yue, Y.; Fan, X.; Wu, J. Heterologous expression of a novel zoysia japonica c2H2 zinc finger gene, ZjZFN1, improved salt tolerance in arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Li, C.; Lv, J.; Zhao, X.; Ai, X.; Zhu, X.; Wang, M.; Zhao, S.; Xia, G. TaCHP: A wheat zinc finger protein gene down-regulated by abscisic acid and salinity stress plays a positive role in stress tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Santosh Kumar, V.V.; Verma, R.K.; Yadav, S.K.; Yadav, P.; Watts, A.; Rao, M.V.; Chinnusamy, V. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated genome editing of drought and salt tolerance (OsDST) gene in indica mega rice cultivar MTU1010. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2020, 26, 1099–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Chen, S.; Zhang, N.; Zhou, G.; Hussain, S.; Ahmed, S.; Tian, H.; Wang, S. Knockout of the entire family of AITR genes in Arabidopsis leads to enhanced drought and salinity tolerance without fitness costs. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of TFs as key components in transcriptional regulatory networks during drought and salinity stress-signaling pathways in different crops/plants. A diagrammatic representation of gene expression and drought and salinity stress signal perception in plants via ABA-independent and ABA-dependent pathways (modified from Khan et al. [34]).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of TFs as key components in transcriptional regulatory networks during drought and salinity stress-signaling pathways in different crops/plants. A diagrammatic representation of gene expression and drought and salinity stress signal perception in plants via ABA-independent and ABA-dependent pathways (modified from Khan et al. [34]).
Biomolecules 11 01159 g001
Figure 2. Genes and signaling pathways that regulate drought stress tolerance. These pathways include the AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, HD-Zip, MADS-box, MYB, NAC, WHIRLY, WRKY, and zinc finger. These regulators control drought stress tolerance through ABA-independent and -induced pathways, which play an essential role in ROS-scavenging pathways. They are positive regulators in the BR pathway, enable wax biosynthesis and stomatal development, and alter chlorophyll, MDA, POD, SOD, and CAT content. Different text colors represent different transcription factors.
Figure 2. Genes and signaling pathways that regulate drought stress tolerance. These pathways include the AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, HD-Zip, MADS-box, MYB, NAC, WHIRLY, WRKY, and zinc finger. These regulators control drought stress tolerance through ABA-independent and -induced pathways, which play an essential role in ROS-scavenging pathways. They are positive regulators in the BR pathway, enable wax biosynthesis and stomatal development, and alter chlorophyll, MDA, POD, SOD, and CAT content. Different text colors represent different transcription factors.
Biomolecules 11 01159 g002
Figure 3. Genes and signaling pathways that regulate salinity stress tolerance. These pathways include the bHLH, HD-Zip, MADS-box, MYB, WRKY, YABBY, and zinc finger. These regulators control salinity stress tolerance through ABA-independent, -responsive, and -mediated pathways, among others, playing an essential role in ROS, chlorophyll content, MDA, POD, SOD, CAT, UV radiation, and proline content. Different text colors represent different transcription factors.
Figure 3. Genes and signaling pathways that regulate salinity stress tolerance. These pathways include the bHLH, HD-Zip, MADS-box, MYB, WRKY, YABBY, and zinc finger. These regulators control salinity stress tolerance through ABA-independent, -responsive, and -mediated pathways, among others, playing an essential role in ROS, chlorophyll content, MDA, POD, SOD, CAT, UV radiation, and proline content. Different text colors represent different transcription factors.
Biomolecules 11 01159 g003
Figure 4. Genes and signaling pathways that regulate drought and salinity stress tolerance. These pathways include the AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, DREB, HD-Zip, Homeo-box, MADS-box, MYB, NAC, Tri-helix, WOX, WHIRLY, WRKY, YABBY, and zinc finger. These regulators control drought and salinity stress tolerance through ABA-dependent, -independent, -responsive, -inducible, and -sensitivity pathways, among others, which play an essential role in photosynthesis, the cell cycle, stomatal development, and ROS, chlorophyll, MDA, POD, SOD, CAT, starch, and proline content. Different text colors represent different transcription factors.
Figure 4. Genes and signaling pathways that regulate drought and salinity stress tolerance. These pathways include the AP2/ERF, bHLH, bZIP, DREB, HD-Zip, Homeo-box, MADS-box, MYB, NAC, Tri-helix, WOX, WHIRLY, WRKY, YABBY, and zinc finger. These regulators control drought and salinity stress tolerance through ABA-dependent, -independent, -responsive, -inducible, and -sensitivity pathways, among others, which play an essential role in photosynthesis, the cell cycle, stomatal development, and ROS, chlorophyll, MDA, POD, SOD, CAT, starch, and proline content. Different text colors represent different transcription factors.
Biomolecules 11 01159 g004
Figure 5. Genetic regulatory network constructed for drought and salinity tolerance genes. The figure shows different interactions, such as gene neighborhood, fusions, co-occurrence, text mining, co-expression, and protein homology. For example, green represents the gene neighborhood, red represents gene fusion, blue represents gene co-occurrence, yellow represents text mining, and black represents co-expression.
Figure 5. Genetic regulatory network constructed for drought and salinity tolerance genes. The figure shows different interactions, such as gene neighborhood, fusions, co-occurrence, text mining, co-expression, and protein homology. For example, green represents the gene neighborhood, red represents gene fusion, blue represents gene co-occurrence, yellow represents text mining, and black represents co-expression.
Biomolecules 11 01159 g005
Table 1. The genes involved in drought and salinity stress tolerance in different plants.
Table 1. The genes involved in drought and salinity stress tolerance in different plants.
Gene NameTFsFunctionExpressionSpeciesReferences
OsERF48AP2/ERFEnhances root growthSeedlings rootsRice[46]
OsERF71AP2/ERFCell wall modification, root structureRoot meristemRice[47]
SHN1AP2/ERFActivates Wax BiosynthesisFlowerArabidopsis[48]
SHN2AP2/ERFActivates Wax BiosynthesisFlowerArabidopsis[48]
SHN3AP2/ERFActivates Wax BiosynthesisFlowerArabidopsis[48]
OsERF922AP2/ERFModulation of the ABA levelsShootRice[49]
PsAP2AP2/ERFRegulate the level of RNS and ROSLeaves, floral bud, rootPapaver somniferum[43]
TaERF1AP2/ERFStress signal transduction pathwaysLeafWheat[50]
AtbHLH68bHLHRegulation of lateral root elongationShoot and rootArabidopsis[51]
FtbHLH3bHLHActivating the antioxidant systemRoot, stem, flower, and leavesFagopyrum tataricum[52]
PebHLH35bHLHRegulating stomatal density and apertureRoot and leafArabidopsis[53]
TabHLH49bHLHRegulates dehydrin WZY2 gene expressionLeaves, stem and rootswheat[54]
OsbHLH068bHLHControl floweringLeaves and aerial tissuesArabidopsis[55]
OsbHLH035bHLHReduces ABA levelsGerminating seeds, seedlingsRice[56]
AabHLH35bHLHImproved tolerance to drought stressLeafAnthurium andraeanum[57]
AtbHLH112bHLHProline biosynthesis and ROS scavengingRoot, leavesArabidopsis[58]
EcbHLH57bHLHImproved root growthLeaf, rootFinger millet[59]
MdPIF3bHLHPositively regulates the drought resistanceRootMalus domestica[60]
MfbHLH38bHLHRegulating osmotic balanceLeaves, rootsMyrothamnus flabellifolia[61]
PtrABFbZIPScavenging ROS and enhances dehydrationLeavesPoncirus trifoliate[62]
ABF3bZIPActivate target genes in ABA signalingRootArabidopsis[63]
AREB1bZIPActivate target genes in ABA signalingRootArabidopsis[63]
AREB2bZIPActivate target genes in ABA signalingRootArabidopsis[63]
OsbZIP72bZIPPositive regulator of ABA responseSeedlingsRice[64]
TabZIP60bZIPIncreased plant sensitivity to ABASpikes, leaves, stemsWheat[65]
OsABF2bZIPPositive regulator of ABA signalingVarious rice tissuesRice[66]
OsbZIP71bZIPImportant role in ABA-mediatedRoot, shootRice[67]
OsbZIP46bZIPNegatively regulate ABA signalingLeafRice[68]
OsbZIP23bZIPImproved sensitivity to ABALeaves, root, shootRice[69]
OsABI5bZIPLow fertilityMature pollenRice[70]
AtDREB1ADREBHigher proline and SOD activityLeavesArabidopsis[72]
GmDREBaDREBTranscriptional activation abilityLeaves, seedlingsSoybean[73]
GmDREBbDREBTranscriptional activation abilityLeaves, seedlingsSoybean[73]
DREB1/CBFDREBAcquisition of stress toleranceSeed maturationArabidopsis[74]
DREB2DREBAcquisition of stress toleranceSeed maturationArabidopsis[74]
SbDREB2ADREBResponse to stressLeaves and rootSalicornia brachiata[75]
OsGATA23aGATAResponse to environmental signalsSeedling, stemRice[11]
OsGATA16GATAEnhanced drought tolerancePanicles, guard cellsRice[76]
TaHDZipI-5HD-ZipDelayed flowering and a grain yield decreaseFlowers and grainsWheat[77]
OsTF1LHD-ZipLignin biosynthesis and stomatal closureRoot, shoot, flowerRice[78]
JcHDZ07HD-ZipChanges in physiological indexesRoots, leaves, seedsArabidopsis/Nut[79]
MtHB2HD-ZipNegative role in regulation of abiotic stressPods, leaves, root, stemMedicago truncatula[9]
Zmhdz10HD-ZipABA signal transduction pathwayRoot, stem, tassels, ears, leafMaize[10]
ATHB17HD-ZipAlleviating the damage to chloroplastRoot, leavesArabidopsis[12]
Oshox4HD-ZipControlling ABA signal perceptionLeavesRice[80]
Gshdz4HD-ZipPositively regulates bicarbonateLeaves, stem, rootSoybean[81]
OsHOX22HomeoboxHigher sensitivity to ABA and hormonesRoot, fresh weightRice[82]
OsHOX24HomeoboxHigher sensitivity to ABA and hormonesRoot, fresh weightRice[82]
SlMBP11MADS-boxHigher chlorophyll content, higher MDARoot and shootArabidopsis[83]
OsMADS25MADS-boxHigher proline contents, MDASeedling, shoot and rootRice[84]
SlMBP8MADS-boxNegative regulator in stress responseRoot, sepals and fruitsTomato[85]
AtMYB60MYBStomatal MovementsSeedling, stem, leaves, flowerArabidopsis[86]
OsMYB4MYBImproved physiological and biochemical adaptationLeaves, root, stem, flower, seedRice/Transgenic Apple[87]
GmMYB84MYBImproves drought stress response and promotes root growthRoot and flowerSoybean[88]
OsMYB55MYBEncoding proteins involved in general defense responses and abiotic stressSeedlingsRice/Maize[89]
GaMYB62LMYBEnhanced the expression of ABARoot and leavesArabidopsis[90]
GaMYB85MYBReduced stomatal density, with greater stomatal sizeSeedlingsCotton[91]
AtMYBLMYBPromoting leaf senescenceLeavesArabidopsis[92]
ARS1MYBStomatal closureRoot, flower, leavesTomato[93]
PacMYBAMYBPathogen resistanceLeafSweet cherry[94]
GmMYB12B2MYBRegulates UV radiationSeedlingsSoybean[95]
TaSIMMYBImprove crop resistance to salt stressesRoot, leaf, and stemWheat[96]
LpMYB1MYBImprove the drought and salt toleranceSeedling, root, seedsLablab purpureus[97]
MdoMYB121MYBRoles in secondary metabolismSeed germination, seedlingTomato/Apple[98]
MYB44MYBOxidative damage and hypersensitivityLeaves, seedlingsArabidopsis[99]
TaMYB19MYBLeads to improved stress toleranceRoot, seedlingsWheat[100]
BplMYB46MYBAffects secondary cell wall depositionStem, leaves, rootBetula platyphylla[101]
OsMYB511MYBPanicle developmentPanicles at an earlier stageRice[102]
OsMYB3R-2MYBMediated by regulating the cell cycleSeedlingRice[103]
GmMYB118MYBReducing the contents of ROS and MDARootSoybean[104]
HvMYB1MYBActing as a mediator of ABA actionRoots and leavesBarley[105]
OsNAC006NACResponses to stimuli, cofactor bindingStems and leavesRice[106]
TaRNAC1NACEnlargement of the root systemRootWheat[107]
MfNACsaNACOxidation-reduction and lipid transportRoot and leavesMedicago falcata[108]
SlNAC35NACInvolving auxin and SA signalingRootsTomato[109]
OsNAC2NACRegulates both abiotic stress responses and ABA-dependentRoot and leavesRice[110]
TsNAC1NACRegulates the expansion of cellsRoot, mature tissues, shootT. halophila[111]
GmNAC5NACInvolved in seed development and abiotic stress responsesRoots and immature seedsSoybean[112]
RsNAC023NACReacted to all stresses except ABARoots, flowers, and leavesRadish[113]
RsNAC145NACReacted to all stresses except ABARoot, flower, and leavesRadish[113]
ANAC069NACDecreased ROS scavenging capability and proline biosynthesisLeaves, stems, siliquesArabidopsis[114]
ONAC022NACModulating an ABA-mediated pathwaySeedling and paniclesRice[115]
CsGT1-3Tri-helixStress toleranceLeavesTea Plant[116]
CsGT2-1Tri-helixStress toleranceLeavesTea Plant[116]
GmGT-2ATri-helixRegulate plant stress responsesStem, podsSoybean[117]
GmGT-2BTri-helixRegulate plant stress responsesStem, podsSoybean[117]
BnSIP1-1Tri-helixRoles in ABA synthesis and signalingRoots, stems, leaves, pollensBrassica napus[118]
OsGTγ-2Tri-helixRegulating salinity adaptationRoots, stems and seedsRice[119]
AtGT2LTri-helixInteracts with calcium/calmodulinFlowers and leavesArabidopsis[120]
AST1Tri-helixReduced ROS accumulationLeaves, stems, and anthersArabidopsis[121]
SlWHY2WHIRLYReducing ROS accumulationPollensTomato[122]
BpWOXWOXPlant development and stress responsesApical bud, stem, and rootPaper mulberry[123]
OsWOX13WOXTriggers early floweringLeavesRice[124]
WRKY46WRKYBR-regulated plant growthLeavesArabidopsis[125]
WRKY54WRKYBR-regulated plant growthLeavesArabidopsis[125]
WRKY70WRKYBR-regulated plant growthLeavesArabidopsis[125]
AtWRKY53WRKYMediating stomatal movementGuard cellsArabidopsis[126]
OsWRKY47WRKYReduction in photosynthesis and high yieldsLeavesRice[127]
WRKY20WRKYRegulates ABA signalingSeedlingsSoybean[128]
WRKY25WRKYIncreasing sensitivity to ABALeaves, siliques, flower, rootArabidopsis[129]
WRKY33WRKYIncreasing sensitivity to ABALeaves, siliques, flower, rootArabidopsis[129]
GhWRKY6-likeWRKYActivating the ABA signaling pathway, scavenging of ROSRoots, stem, leaves, flowers, and anthersCotton[130]
SlWRKY3WRKYRegulation of senescence related processLeaves and mature fruitTomato[131]
WRKY18WRKYPlant defense and stress responsesSeed germination and rootArabidopsis[132]
WRKY40WRKYPlant defense and stress responsesSeed germination and rootArabidopsis[132]
WRKY60WRKYPlant defense and stress responsesSeed germination and rootArabidopsis[132]
ZmWRKY17WRKYDecreased ABA sensitivityTassels, Leaf, rootMaize[133]
GhWRKY41WRKYEnhanced stomatal closureStomataCotton[134]
GhWRKY68WRKYRegulating ABA signalingLeafCotton[135]
MtWRKY76WRKYIncreased salt and drought toleranceRoot, seedlingMedicago truncatula[136]
GmWRKY27WRKYImprovements in stress toleranceRoot, cotyledonsSoybean[137]
IbWRKY2WRKYEnhancing the tolerance to abiotic stressSeedling, leaves, germinationSweet potato[138]
ZmWRKY58WRKYPositive regulator of stress toleranceRoot, leaf, germinationRice/Maize[139]
SlWRKY8WRKYResistance to pathogen infectionStem, roots, flowersTomato[140]
SlWRKY81WRKYRegulator of stomatal closureLeavesTomato[141,142,143]
AcYABBY4YABBYImportant role in response to ABASepal and petalPineapple[144]
GmYABBY10YABBYHighly sensitive in droughtSeedling, root, germinationSoybean[145]
Cm-BBX24Zinc fingerModulating gibberellin biosynthesisRoot, leaves, stemChrysanthemum[146]
OsC3H10Zinc fingerResponse to droughtSeedsRice[147]
ZAT18Zinc fingerPositive drought stress regulatorStems, siliques, leavesArabidopsis[148]
ZjZFN1Zinc fingerStress responses in seed germinationLeaf, stem, rootZoysia japonica[149]
TaCHPZinc fingerEnhances stress toleranceRoots, leafWheat[150]
OsDSTZinc fingerStomatal densityFlag leafRice[151]
OsRR22OtherEnhanced the tolerance to salinityShootRice[152]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hussain, Q.; Asim, M.; Zhang, R.; Khan, R.; Farooq, S.; Wu, J. Transcription Factors Interact with ABA through Gene Expression and Signaling Pathways to Mitigate Drought and Salinity Stress. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1159. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081159

AMA Style

Hussain Q, Asim M, Zhang R, Khan R, Farooq S, Wu J. Transcription Factors Interact with ABA through Gene Expression and Signaling Pathways to Mitigate Drought and Salinity Stress. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(8):1159. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hussain, Quaid, Muhammad Asim, Rui Zhang, Rayyan Khan, Saqib Farooq, and Jiasheng Wu. 2021. "Transcription Factors Interact with ABA through Gene Expression and Signaling Pathways to Mitigate Drought and Salinity Stress" Biomolecules 11, no. 8: 1159. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop