Next Article in Journal
A New Era of Neuro-Oncology Research Pioneered by Multi-Omics Analysis and Machine Learning
Next Article in Special Issue
Plant-Based Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles: Production, Characterization and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Thrombin in Central Nervous System Injury and Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
Green Biosynthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Leaf Extract of Carissa carandas L. and Their Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity against Human Pathogenic Bacteria
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/biom11040564
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plant-Based Biosynthesis of Copper/Copper Oxide Nanoparticles: An Update on Their Applications in Biomedicine, Mechanisms, and Toxicity

by
Devanthiran Letchumanan
1,†,
Sophia P. M. Sok
1,2,†,
Suriani Ibrahim
3,
Noor Hasima Nagoor
1,2 and
Norhafiza Mohd Arshad
1,*
1
Centre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
2
Institute of Biological Sciences (Genetics and Molecular Biology), Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(4), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11040564
Submission received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 27 February 2021 / Accepted: 3 March 2021 / Published: 12 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-based green synthesis of nanoparticles: production, characterization and applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Plants are rich in phytoconstituent biomolecules that served as a good source of medicine. More recently, they have been employed in synthesizing metal/metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) due to their capping and reducing properties. This green synthesis approach is environmentally friendly and allows the production of the desired NPs in different sizes and shapes by manipulating parameters during the synthesis process. The most commonly used metals and oxides are gold (Au), silver (Ag), and copper (Cu). Among these, Cu is a relatively low-cost metal that is more cost-effective than Au and Ag. In this review, we present an overview and current update of plant-mediated Cu/copper oxide (CuO) NPs, including their synthesis, medicinal applications, and mechanisms. Furthermore, the toxic effects of these NPs and their efficacy compared to commercial NPs are reviewed. This review provides an insight into the potential of developing plant-based Cu/CuO NPs as a therapeutic agent for various diseases in the future.

1. Introduction

Nanoparticles (NPs) are materials ranging in size from 1–100 nm, with unique properties compared to bulk materials [1]. Their higher surface-area-to-volume ratio is a very important unique property that allows them to be used in different fields of chemical, food, electronic, and healthcare industries [2,3,4]. There are various physical, chemical, and biological approaches to synthesizing NPs (Figure 1).
Generally, physical and chemical methods are used commercially for the synthesis of NPs. Chemical methods such as the electrochemical method [5], precipitation [6], the sonochemical route [7], sol-gel [8,9], the hydrothermal approach [10,11], chemical bath deposition [12], chemical reduction [13], and chemical vapor deposition use harsh reducing agents, organic solvents, and toxic chemicals and produce dangerous byproducts [14,15,16]. The use of harsh synthetic chemicals, including sodium borohydride [17], hypophosphite [18], and hydrazine [19], as reducing agents in the chemical approach leads to the adsorption of harsh chemicals on the surface of the synthesized NPs and, eventually, increase their toxicity [20]. On the other hand, the physical methods, such as plasma, pulsed laser, gamma radiation, and mechanical milling, normally require high energy and are more time-consuming to scale-up compared to green synthesis [16,21,22].
In recent years, the development of an efficient “green” chemistry method for synthesizing metal NPs has become a major focus of researchers. Green synthesis of Cu and CuO NPs is more advantageous than chemical and physical synthesis as it is a clean, nontoxic, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly approach. It bypasses the use of harsh, toxic, and expensive chemicals [22] and, instead, utilizes biological entities like bacteria [23], yeasts [24], fungi [25], algae [26], and plants [20]. Among all these natural organisms used in the green synthesis of Cu and CuO NPs, plants rich in bioactive compounds can serve as a reducing, stabilizing, and capping agent during NP synthesis; this makes them the best choice. They are nonpathogenic to humans, and the downstream processing steps are simple [27]. Unlike some bacterial and fungal strains that produce the NPs intracellularly, plant-mediated NP synthesis yields the NPs in the mixture solution, which can be easily obtained by filtering, rinsing, and drying [11,28]. The size, morphology, and stability of NPs can also be easily optimized for medicinal and pharmaceutical usage using this green method [5,29,30]. In this review, we focus on the updates of Cu and CuO NPs synthesized from plants and their medicinal application.

2. Copper Nanoparticles

In recent years, the development of metal and metal oxide NPs has greatly enhanced the biomedical field in terms of biosensing, imaging, diagnosis, and therapy [31,32,33,34]. The most commonly used metals and their oxides are gold (Au), silver (Ag), and copper (Cu). Among these, Cu is a relatively low-cost metal that is more cost-effective than Au and Ag [35]. Additionally, Cu NPs are efficient catalysts, with high yields and easy product separation, and they can be reused repeatedly [36].
In fact, Cu is needed in a minimal amount, together with the essential enzymes in the human body. For example, superoxide dismutase, cytochrome oxidase, and tyrosinase are made up of this trace element [37]. However, Cu-free ions are potentially harmful to the human body at the cell, organ, and body levels. Therefore, Cu ions in living organisms should be regulated [38].
Cu NPs can be easily oxidized to form copper oxides (CuOs), which are inorganic NPs. Both Cu and CuO NPs are used extensively as anticancer, antimicrobial, and antioxidant agents [39,40]. This is mainly due to the fact that NPs are able to interact with the biological system at cellular levels for various reactions and functions [41,42].

3. Plant-Based Green Synthesis of Copper and Copper Oxide Nanoparticles

Plants produce numerous secondary metabolites and contain phytochemicals, which are potential bioresources for synthesizing Cu and CuO NPs. The most important phytochemicals in plants are phenols and flavonoids, found in different parts of the plants, such as shoots, leaves, stems, flowers, roots, and fruits. These phenolic compounds possess hydroxyl and ketone groups, contributing to the iron chelation and subsequently demonstrating a strong antioxidant property [43]. NPs synthesized through this green method increased in stability, prevented the agglomeration and deformation of the NPs and allowed adsorption of phytochemicals on the surface of the NPs, which enhance the reaction rate of NPs [44].
One of the common techniques in synthesizing Cu and CuO NPs is mixing a known concentration of plant extract to a known concentration of precursor and heating the mixture to a fixed temperature, with continuous stirring at a given time (Figure 2, Table 1).
Occasionally, certain organic chemicals were added to prevent agglomeration and obtain fine NPs while maintaining the greener approach. The synthesized NPs eventually form various shapes and sizes, which carry unique properties in many applications [20]. Different characterization techniques can analyze the physical and chemical properties of NPs. In addition to size and shape, the size distribution, degree of aggregation, surface charge, surface area, and surface chemistry of the NPs can also be analyzed [88] (Figure 3).
The first step of characterization study after the synthesis of NPs is the crystal structure and its chemical composition [89]. The analytical tools of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), tunneling electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), particle analyzers, and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) were used to analyze the size and morphology of the Cu/CuO NPs., while UV–visible spectroscopy (UV–vis), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), surface plasmon resonance, and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were used to analyze the elemental chemical compositions of Cu/CuO NPs [90]. Based on our literature search, the size of Cu/CuO NPs synthesized using a plant source resulted in sizes ranging from 2–577 nm, with spherical, oval-shaped, plate, rectangular, cuboidal, and cubical shapes (Table 1).

3.1. Synthesis Strategy of CuO, Cu2O, and Cu4O3 NPs

Cu exists with variable oxidation numbers; this includes Cu(I), Cu(II), and very few Cu(III) ions. To date, the synthesis strategy reported for CuO, Cu2O, and Cu4O3 is the same in terms of parameters such as plant extract, precursor concentration, pH, and temperature. However, it is these parameters that mainly affect the type of Cu particles formed during green synthesis [91]. The synthesized CuO, Cu2O, and Cu4O3 NPs can be differentiated by observing the position of the absorption peaks in the UV–vis spectra analysis. The peak width indicates the size distribution, and the peak height indicates the number of Cu particles produced. At optimum synthesis parameters, a high absorption peak at around 560–585 nm implies a high yield of Cu particles [92]. This is supported by a study conducted by Sampaio et al. (2021) to differentiate between Cu and Cu2O through green synthesis using Cynara scolymus L. The authors reported that a UV–vis spectra absorbance peak at 386 nm indicates the presence of Cu2O, while an absorbance peak at 565 nm detects the presence of Cu particles. Additionally, further differentiation is also done using other analyses, such as EDS spectrum analysis to show elemental compositions and SEM for size distribution (Cu2O NPs with Cu of 81.34% and sizes of 324–711 nm; Cu NPs with Cu of 73.77% and sizes of 364–1125 nm) [93]. The absorbance peak of Cu4O3 synthesized using Razma seed under UV–vis spectra was 270–372 nm [94], which was much lower than Cu and Cu2O, as reported by Sampaio et al. (2021).

3.2. Factors Affecting the Green Synthesis of Cu and CuO NPs

A few parameters play a crucial role in determining the characteristics of the Cu and CuO NPs synthesized; these include reaction temperature, pH, time, concentration of plant extracts, precursor used, and mixing speed (Table 1). In fact, it is the multiple parameters that affect the synthesis of NPs with the desired size and morphology. Therefore, monitoring these parameters could produce NPs with unique properties and promising applications that are easy to scale up with a shorter synthesis time [95].

3.2.1. Temperature

The reaction medium’s temperature was found to influence the nature of the NPs formed. As the reaction temperature increases, the reaction rate increases, consuming metal ions to form the nuclei of the NPs; this may lead to smaller NP sizes [96]. For instance, the biosynthesis of NPs using Ixiro coccinea leaf extract at 27 °C for 24 h produces NPs with a bigger size (80–110 nm) than the NPs (10–50 nm) produced using Pterolobium hexapetalum leaf extract at 60 °C for 2 h using the same precursor [72,81]. These findings suggest that an elevation in temperature reduces the length of time of synthesis, independent of the source of plant extract used.
Generally, green synthesis is conducted at below 100 °C or at ambient temperature [97]. This is because the biomolecules and active components found in the plant extract can easily degrade at high temperatures [98]. For example, at 27 °C, the CuO NPs synthesized from Fragaria ananassa fruit extract [71] and Cissus vitiginea leaf extract [62] yielded sizes of NPs ranging from 10–30 nm and 5–20 nm, respectively. On the other hand, Camellia sinensis leaf extract produced NPs of 67–99 nm at 95 °C [60]. These studies suggest that room temperature is favorable for synthesizing small-sized NPs.
In contrast, a study conducted by Sulaiman et al. (2018) using Olea europaea leaf extract at high temperature, such as 100 °C, produced NPs with relatively small size (20–50 nm) [78]. In support of this, a recent study unveiled that the green synthesis of CuO NPs using Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract decreased in size from 68 to 12 nm when the temperature of the reaction mixture was elevated from 30 to 140 °C [66]. These controversial findings may be due to the effect of other parameters such as phytochemical composition of the plant, pH, time of reaction, and precursor used.
In some studies, different aspects of temperature were focused on, namely, the calcination and annealing of CuO NPs. Calcination and annealing are known as heat treatments performed postsynthesis to decompose and purify a material. It was demonstrated that the size of synthesized NPs is proportional to annealing and calcination temperatures. This is evident in the research conducted by Fardood and colleagues using black tea extract, whereby the size of the CuO NPs increased from 22.3 to 38.7 nm when the annealing temperature increased from 500 to 800 °C, respectively [59]. Similarly, the size of henna-extract-mediated CuO NPs increased from 22.5 to 38.3 nm when the annealing temperature increased from 400 to 800 °C [73]. A recent comparative study reflected that a reduction in the size of annealed CuO NPs is due to the difference in phase transitions between unannealed and annealed NPs [67]. The annealing process also resulted in black precipitate agglomerated and highly characterized cubic-shaped NPs compared to the elongated morphology obtained from unannealed NPs [67]. These data indicate the implication of temperature on the size of Cu/CuO NPs.

3.2.2. Time

NPs can undergo aggregation, shrink, or grow during long-term storage and it also has a shelf life that eventually affects its overall potential [99,100]. A study by Mudunkotuwa et al. (2012), comparing new and aged Cu NPs, reported a change in size and also chemical behavior of the Cu NPs. The size of new Cu NPs increased from 10 ± 5 to 18 ± 10 nm for Cu NPs aged under ambient conditions. It was also found that the aged Cu NPs were highly oxidized compared to new Cu NPs [101]. A similar trend was also observed in the duration of the green synthesis reaction performed. Studies have implied that the size of NPs is dependent on the reaction time [49,64,73,87]. It can be seen that increases in the time taken for green synthesis increase the size of the NPs. From Table 1, green synthesis of Cu and CuO NPs using Allium eriophyllum Boiss at 16 h produced NPs with a larger size (30–35 nm), while synthesis using Ailanthus altissima at 4 h produced smaller sized (5–20 nm) NPs [47,49]. However, time does not greatly influence the size of the NPs, as other factors such as type of plant extract, precursor, and temperature, have even more effect, as evident in Table 1.

3.2.3. Concentration of Plant Extracts

Plants with bioaccumulation and heavy-metal detoxification properties are the best for NP synthesis [20]. The biomolecules in plant extracts can act as natural capping and reducing agents during the green synthesis of NPs. These metabolite compositions vary depending on the types and parts of the plant and the extraction procedure [102]. Hence, the volume of plant extracts and the amount of biomolecules present in the plant extract used can affect the synthesis rate due to the availability of these molecules for the rapid bioreduction of metal salts and the stabilization of NPs [103]. It was demonstrated that increased concentrations of plant extract speed up the rate of reduction of copper ions in the solution, which directly increases the formation rate of Cu and CuO NPs [80]. This is attributed to the phytochemicals present in the plant extract, which are responsible for the bioreduction and stabilization of the NPs [80].
In addition to speeding up the reaction, an increase in the concentration of plant extract also decreases the size and alters the shape of the CuO NPs formed. A recent study demonstrated that synthesizing CuO NPs using a different volume of sugarcane juice, ranging from 2–10 mL, produced CuO NPs that were 29.89–22.80 nm in size [82]. Notably, the CuO NPs synthesized were spherical when using a higher concentration of sugarcane juices. In contrast, various shapes were observed from the CuO NPs synthesized with lower concentrations of sugarcane juice, ranging from spherical, square, cube, and plate shapes to a rectangular shape, along with some irregular shapes [82]. This is supported by previous studies demonstrating that increasing the concentration of plant extract when synthesizing NPs alters NP morphology, from irregular to spherical, and the size of the NPs [80]. These studies provide evidence on the interchange of morphology based on the plant extract used.

3.2.4. Precursor Used

The precursor is a salt and alkali metal solution. Numerous soluble copper salts were used in the green synthesis of Cu and CuO NPs, such as copper chloride (CuCl2), copper sulfate (CuSO4), copper acetate (Cu(OAc)2), and copper nitrate (Cu(NO3)2). Copper salts are the primary source for releasing Cu2+ ions in reaction mixtures; the bioreduction of these ions by the plant extracts forms the complete NP [80].
There is limited information for comparison between the different precursors used and their effect on the green synthesis of Cu and CuO NPs. A comparative study between different precursors such as CuCl2, Cu(NO3)2, and CuSO4, used in the physical synthesis of CuO NPs by Sanjini et al. (2017), reported that changing the precursor has no significant impact on the crystal structures of CuO NPs. In this study, the synthesis of CuO NPs using the precursor CuCl2 formed CuO NPs of 31 nm, 34 nm when using Cu(NO3)2 and 56 nm when using CuSO4. Hence, this indicated that CuO NPs synthesized using CuCl2 as a precursor may produce smaller NPs [104]. However, another study conducted by Phiwdang et al. (2013), using precursors CuCl2 and Cu(NO3)2, reported that CuCl2 forms spherical-shaped particles, while Cu(NO3)2 forms rod-shaped particles. The result also suggested that better formation and good crystallinity of CuO NPs were obtained using the Cu(NO3)2 precursor compared to CuCl2 [105]. It was also revealed that a low concentration of the precursor produced smaller-sized NPs, whereas a high concentration of the precursor produced larger NPs with faster agglomeration [95,106]. The results from these different studies suggest that in-depth experimental work is needed to determine the effect of precursors on the size and shape of NPs synthesized from plants.

3.2.5. pH

The pH of the reacting mixture in the biosynthesis of NPs is also one of the factors affecting the size of NPs. The optimum pH of the reaction medium ranges from 7–9, suggesting an alkaline condition is favorable for synthesizing NPs [107]. As evident from Table 1, biosynthesis of NPs occurring at the alkaline condition of pH > 8 produces smaller-sized NPs. The NPs synthesized in an acidic condition of pH < 7 were relatively larger, up to 153.7 nm [67]. A study conducted by Rajesh and his co-researchers has provided evidence that when the pH of the reaction mixture increased from 6 to 10, the Cu NP size decreased from 32 to 20 nm [108]. However, the influence of pH on the morphology of CuO NPs was reported by Singh et al. (2019). The synthesis of CuO NPs at pH 10 (alkaline) produces loosely agglomerated NPs, with sharp CuO NPs with a particle size of 28.2 nm. In contrast, more agglomerated CuO NPs, with a size of 66.3 nm, were produced at pH 7 (neutral). Interestingly, the CuO NPs synthesized at pH 10 showed higher genotoxicity than CuO NPs at pH 7 [109]. The evidence given is based on chemical synthesis; limited study on green synthesis has been conducted so far for pH.

4. Application of Cu and CuO NPs

In this modern era, NPs have been widely employed in cosmetics, textiles, photonics, agriculture, and heavy industries as catalysts. Additionally, the application of NPs has been extended to medicine. Available data suggest that Cu and CuO NPs can be used as antimicrobial, antifungal, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory agents and therapeutic agents for wound healing. The detail on these, including the mechanism, will be discussed in the following sections.

4.1. Antibacterial

Studies have showed that the Cu/CuO NPs have inhibitory growth effects against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (Table 2).
Plant-mediated Cu NPs effectively repressed Gram-negative bacteria in urinary tract infection, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), Enterococcus sp., Proteus sp., and Klebsiella sp. [62]. This implies the potential of these NPs in treating such infection. The plant-derived NPs can also inhibit K. pneumonia, which is pathogenic if spread to other parts of the body [51].
Cu and CuO NPs have also shown a suppressive effect on the growth of Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis), and Streptococcus pyrogenes (S. pyrogenes). S. aureus is a pathogen known to cause respiratory and skin infections, while B. subtilis can cause diarrhea. In contrast, S. pyrogenes infects humans, causing various infections such as rheumatic fever and scarlet fever [51].
It was revealed that sugarcane-juice-mediated NPs are resistant to E. coli compared to Gram-positive bacteria B. subtilis and S. aureus [82]. However, a comparative study between Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli and P. aeruginosa, and gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus and B. cereus, with the treatment of CuO NPs synthesized using fruit extract Tribulus terrestris reported that the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) is higher in Gram-positive bacteria compared to Gram-negative bacteria [81,86]. Altogether, it suggested that diverse size and characteristics of Cu/CuO NPs are required to treat various pathogenic infections based on the type of bacterial agent involved.

Predicted Mechanism for Antibacterial Activity

Generally, the treatment of Cu and CuO NPs permeates the Cu2+ ions intracellularly by interacting with the bacterial cell membrane [64]. Distortion of the bacterial cell membrane was observed under FESEM in response to CuO NPs synthesized from aqueous dried fruit extract of T. terrestris [86]. These CuO NPs also induced ROS generation that accounted for the antibacterial activity (Figure 4) [86].
Many plant-based Cu/CuO NPs that demonstrated an antibacterial effect tend to have antioxidant properties [49,51]. It was found that C. vitiginea-mediated Cu NPs demonstrate antioxidant activity, which contributes to growth inhibition of urinary tract infection pathogens [62]. Likewise, the CuO/Cu NPs from Allium sativum extract and Allium eriophyllum Boiss leaf extract exhibit antibacterial activities that may be due to their antioxidant property [49,51].

4.2. Antifungal

Fungi can cause infections to humans through direct contact. A. flavus is a pathogenic fungus that causes liver cancer in humans when spoiled food is consumed. A. fumigates produces airborne spores, which can cause chronic lung disease if inhaled. C. albicans, found in our body at the mouth and vagina, can cause infections if there is overgrowth [51]. Cu/CuO NPs exerted antifungal properties, suggesting their potential in treating fungal infection (Table 3).
A study has highlighted that the Cu NPs synthesized using A. eriophyllum Boiss leaf extract is more resistant against fungi such as C. guilliermondii and C. krusei compared to bacteria [49]. The fungus has numerous layers of lipids in its cell wall, which makes it challenging for the entry of NPs into the organism [110]. A recent study noted that the green synthesis of CuO NPs triggered damage to the cell wall and accumulated ROS in A. flavus to demonstrate an antifungal effect [66]. In addition, the CuO NPs synthesized from A. sativum extract also exhibited an antioxidant activity that may contribute to the antifungal property [49,51]. The limited data implies that the CuO NPs can induce antifungal properties via different mechanisms (Figure 5).

4.3. Anticancer

Numerous studies have reported the anticancer effect of plant-mediated Cu/CuO NPs, particularly breast [37,53,54,66,78,81,111,112], cervical [53,54,79], colon [37], skin (epithelioma) [54], gastric [86], blood (leukemia) [37], liver [65], lung [54,56,69,70] and ovarian [78] cancers (Table 4).
To determine the anticancer effect of Cu/CuO NPs, the cancer cells, maintained at 37 °C with a continuous supply of 5% carbon dioxide in their respective medium, were seeded in a 96-well plate prior to NP treatment [113,114]. There are various colorimetric assays used in the study of toxicity of cancer cells, such as MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide), MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium), and WST (4-[3-(4-Iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitro-phenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1,3-benzenesulfonate). These assays measure metabolic activity in viable cells based on the reductase activity of the mitochondria [115].
The toxicity to cancer cells varies with different sizes and shapes of the NPs. Previous studies have proposed that large-sized Cu NPs have a higher half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value than small-sized NPs in A549 lung cancer cells and MCF-7 breast cancer [52,54]. Paradoxically, studies also revealed that NPs with size >200 nm have a lower IC50 on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells compared to the 5–24 nm NPs [66,111].
Notably, these Cu/CuO NPs were synthesized using a different source of plants under different conditions. A cytotoxic study conducted by Rehana et al. (2017) on various cancer cells (MCF-7, HeLa, Hep-2, and A549) treated with CuO NPs synthesized using different types of plant extracts from Azadirachta indica, Hibiscus rosa-sinensis, Murraya koenigii, Moringa oleifera, and Tamarindus indica demonstrated different levels of cytotoxic effects. Among these, CuO NPs synthesized using T. indica leaf extract exerted higher cytotoxicity against all cancer cells, as evidenced by the lower IC50 [54] (Table 4). It was found that the T. indica leaf extract contains more proteins, amino acids, carbohydrates, higher flavonoids, glycosides, phenolic compounds, saponins, and tannins compared to other plant extracts [54]. This may explain the difference in the anticancer activity of the NPs of similar size.

Predicted Mechanism for Anticancer Activity

A plethora of studies has been reported on the application of plant-based Cu/CuO NPs. However, the precise mechanism or signaling in regulating the activity of these NPs remained ambiguous. Based on the available data of plant-based and commercial Cu/CuO NPs, we summarize the mechanism of these NPs, demonstrating their effects (Figure 6).
The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is known to be the major contributor to cell death induced by Cu/CuO NPs synthesized from plants (Figure 6 (1)). Mitochondria are the center of energy metabolism and cellular signaling [116]. The disruption of this organelle is implicated in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO), and, subsequently, oxidative stress [117]. Alteration of the mitochondria structure, accompanied by the loss of membrane potential, was observed in response to black-bean-extract-mediated CuO NPs in HeLa cervical cancer cells, signifying mitochondrial damage [79]. Moreover, the intracellular ROS level was significantly increased in response to CuO NPs synthesized from black bean extract and leaf extract of Ficus religiose, E. globulus, and P. hexapetalum [66,69,79,81]. It was accompanied by the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential in A549 lung cancer, HeLa cervical cancer cells, and MCF-7 breast cancer cells, respectively [66,69,79]. In addition to the accumulation of ROS, the uptake of CuO NPs synthesized from A. indica leaf also upregulated the NO level in MCF-7 and HeLa cancer cells [53].
On the other hand, studies have suggested that an increased ROS level may be detected in cancer cells due to high metabolic activities. Therefore, suppressing the ROS level is a beneficial approach in this aspect. The CuO NPs produced from Matricaria chamomilla flower extract, leaves of A. indica, H. rosa-sinensis, M. koenigii, M. oleifera, T. indica, Eclipta prostrate, and O. europaea exhibited an antioxidant property, as shown by their free radical scavenging ability [54,65,78,118] (Figure 6 (2)). A recent review proposed that the level of ROS was slightly enhanced in cancer cells, which, in turn, favor them to develop antioxidant mechanisms that enhanced their sensitivity towards external stimuli [116]. This characteristic promotes the production of ROS [116]. Given that the ROS is mandatory in cancer initiation, depletion of the ROS level would be beneficial to overcome cellular transformation [116]. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the role of ROS in disease conditions to select a CuO with a suitable property.
Excessive oxidative stress in cells leads to cellular damage and cell death. A high intracellular ROS level can trigger DNA damage, which is characterized by DNA fragmentation [116] (Figure 6 (3)). The oxidative stress induced by A. indica leaf CuO NPs in cancer cells is attributed to DNA fragmentation [53]. This finding is consistent with a recent study that examined the genotoxicity of commercial CuO NPs [119]. In contrast, the CuO NPs produced from M. chamomilla flower extract, with antioxidant properties, were found to interact directly with the plasmid, implicated in DNA cleavage [118]. DNA damage is coupled to the expression of tumor suppressor genes (p53 and p21), whereby the upregulation of these genes halts the cell cycle and induces apoptosis [120]. The exposure of NPs promotes DNA damage that eventually halts the cell cycle. Biofabrication of CuO NPs using E. globulus leaf extract and Beta vulgaris aqueous extract induced cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and A549 cancer cells, respectively [56,66]. Additionally, the expression of p53 was upregulated [66]. A study proposed that the increased level of tumor suppressor genes (p21 and p53) and the decreased level of oncogenes, MMP-2, and MMP-9 expressions, in response to plant-based CuO NPs, are regulated by the various histone deacetylase (HDAC), enzymes that create a nontranscriptional compact chromatin structure by the removal of the acetyl group on histones [70] (Figure 6 (5)).
Apoptosis is a programmed cell death mechanism governed by a series of caspases in response to cellular stress and DNA damage [121]. This cell death can be induced via intrinsic and extrinsic pathways. The intrinsic pathway involves the mediation of proapoptotic proteins, Bak/Bax expression on mitochondria by an antiapoptotic protein, Bcl-2 to induce membrane permeabilization, and the release of cytochrome c to form the apoptosome with the Apaf-1 adaptor and pro-caspase-9 [88]. As for the extrinsic apoptotic pathway, caspase-8 is activated by the ligand and death receptor interaction on the cell surface. Both the activation of intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis will cleave the major executioner caspases, such as caspase-3 and caspase-7 [121]. Studies have shown that the expression of intrinsic apoptotic mRNA and protein, such as Bax, cytochrome c, caspase-9, and caspase-7, are remarkably upregulated when treated with CuO NPs [53,66,70] (Figure 6 (1)). The expression of caspase-8 also increased simultaneously in the CuO-NPs-treated cells, signifying the potential to initiate extrinsic apoptosis [53,70] (Figure 6 (6)). It seems that the plant-mediated CuO NPs induced apoptosis via both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways.
Recently, it was reported that commercial CuO-NP-induced apoptosis could be triggered by endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, as evidenced by the upregulation of ER-stress-related mRNA and protein expression, implicating the multiple pathways involved in inducing apoptosis [122] (Figure 6 (7)). A previous study employed the lipidomics approach to reveal the alteration in lipid profile upon commercial CuO NP exposure in the HCT-116 colon cancer cell line [123]. Interestingly, the CuO NP treatment promotes autophagy but not apoptosis, which may contribute to cancer cell death [123] (Figure 6 (8)). In fact, this autophagy induction may act as a cellular defense against the toxicity of CuO NPs, whereby the inhibition of autophagy, either pharmacologically or genetically, successfully triggers apoptosis in CuO-NP-treated cells [124].
Taken altogether, the CuO NPs have demonstrated their anticancer effects via multiple signaling routes, such as ROS generation, antioxidant property, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and autophagy. The mode of action of CuO NPs may vary depending on the route and source of Cu/CuO NP synthesis and the cell line used. Current studies of NPs focus on the application and effects, but not the molecular mechanism or signaling. For example, it was documented that CuO NPs from sinapic acid from plants have an antiangiogenic effect on human breast cancers, but their molecular pathway remains unknown [111]. It is crucial to elucidate the precise molecular mechanism of these NPs in different conditions and cell types to provide a better insight into their application in biomedicine.

4.4. Wound Healing and Anti-Inflammatory Activity

In addition to antibacterial, antifungal, and anticancer effects, plant-mediated Cu/CuO NPs also demonstrate wound healing and anti-inflammatory properties. The biosynthesis of Cu NP ointment from plants such as F. ananassa (Strawberry) and A. eriophyllum has wound-healing effects, as shown by reduced neutrophil and lymphocyte recruitment as well as cutaneous wound closure in rats [49,71]. In the mouse model of inflammatory pain induced by various stimuli, Abies spectabilis-mediated CuO NP treatment significantly suppressed the infiltration of leukocytes and inflammatory cytokines [45]. The potency of A. sativum CuO NPs in inhibiting the inflammation triggered by egg albumin has been documented [67]. These studies indicate the potential of plant-mediated Cu/CuO NPs in reducing inflammation, relieving pain, and promoting wound healing.
In contrast, a recent study using macrophages has reported that commercial CuO NPs and their ions can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, an intracellular sensor that regulates the release of proinflammatory cytokines [125]. This finding suggests that phytochemicals that served as capping agents in plant-mediated CuO NPs can suppress the inflammatory response.

5. Toxicity Evaluation

Although Cu/CuO NPs have various therapeutic effects, the toxicity of these NPs against normal cells and vital organs in humans can cause undesired adverse effects. This aspect should be evaluated thoroughly before utilizing these NPs in medicine. Here, we review the toxicity of plant-based green-synthesized Cu and CuO NPs in vitro and in vivo studies.
A previous study has demonstrated that plant-mediated Cu NPs are relatively safe on normal human cell lines (Table 5).
It has been shown that normal human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), treated with up to 1000 μg/mL of Cu NPs biosynthesized from strawberry, remain highly viable [49]. The IC50 values reported for the treatment with Cu and CuO NPs on normal cell lines are higher than in cancer cells, notably on HEK 293 cells with IC50 410 μg/mL and normal human dermal fibroblast (NHDF)/L929 cells with IC50 > 100 μg/mL. Although the IC50 value of CuO NPs in HuFb (human dermal fibroblast) was 53.34 μg/mL, these NPs have IC50 values of <2.5 μg/mL in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines [78] (Table 4 and Table 5). These data revealed the Cu and CuO NPs have minimal toxicity in normal cells, with a cytotoxicity effect on cancer cells at low concentrations, suggesting their safe application.
Nevertheless, the toxicity and optimal dosage to be administrated should be evaluated. It has been shown that the oral administration of green-synthesized Cu NPs to male Swiss albino mice may affect the digestive system, which contributed to a reduction in the weight of the spleen, with an elevated weight of the liver and kidneys in a dose-dependent manner [78]. In this study, no significant toxicity was observed up to 400 mg/kg, but it was lethal at 800 mg/kg [78]. However, a study conducted in zebrafish embryos revealed that the plant-synthesized CuO NPs tend to accumulate on the skin surface and chorion, causing abnormality in the yolk sacs and pericardial edema [74]. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the toxicity of plant-mediated CuO NPs in various animal models.

6. Comparison of the Efficacy of Plant-Based-Synthesized and Commercial Cu and CuO NPs

Given the advantages of plant-based Cu/CuO NPs in the ease of production, as well as being eco-friendly, the efficacy of these NPs remains as one of the major concerns. Intriguingly, it was documented that the efficacy of these NPs in suppressing cancer proliferation was comparable to commercial CuO NPs or was even better in some of the cases (Table 6).
A detailed cytotoxic comparison study conducted by Rehana and her colleagues on green- and chemically synthesized CuO NPs revealed that green CuO NPs possessed higher toxicity against four different cancer cell lines. Among these, CuO NPs synthesized using T. indica showed more significant toxicity against human breast (MCF-7; IC50: 19.77 ± 0.98), cervical (HeLa; IC50: 20.32 ± 1.16), and lung (A549; IC50: 18.11 ± 0.93) cancer cells compared to commercially synthesized CuO-NP-treated human breast (MCF-7; IC50: 27.44 ± 2.14), cervical (HeLa; IC50: 45.31 ± 2.44), and lung (A549; IC50: 37.19 ± 2.82) cancer cells [54].
Despite inducing cytotoxicity in cancer cells, plant-mediated CuO NPs have less toxicity in healthy animals. In the zebrafish model, green-synthesized and commercial CuO NPs reduced the viability rate in a dose- and time-dependent manner [57]. However, the lethal dose (LC50) for green-synthesized CuO NPs was 175 ± 10 mg/L compared to 45 ± 10 mg/L for commercial CuO NPs [57]. More apoptotic cells were also found in zebrafish treated with commercial CuO NPs than zebrafish treated with green-synthesized CuO NPs [57]. These findings imply the potential of plant-based CuO NPs in cancer therapy without causing significant toxicity to normal cells.
Comparison of the effectiveness of these NPs in wound healing has been documented as well. It was evident that green CuO NPs have great wound healing properties compared to commercial wound ointments [71]. Compared to the control (2.5 ± 0.2 cm2) wound area, the green-CuO-NP-treated group decreased the area to 0.9 ± 0.2 cm2, whereas the CuSO4 ointment group decreased the area to 2.1 ± 0.1 cm2, suggesting green CuO NPs as a better candidate in promoting wound healing [71].

7. Current Status of Cu and CuO NPs and Their Future Perspective in Cancer Therapy

In recent years, NPs have been used as nanomedicines that can be utilized as delivery agents by encapsulating drugs or attaching therapeutic drugs and delivering them to the targeted tissues or cells more effectively [126,127]. They are designed in very small sizes to allow free movement in the human body to target cancer cells [128]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved some NPs, such as Au, Ag, gadolinium oxide, iron oxide, nickel oxide, zinc oxide, and silica NPs, for biomedical applications to cure chronic diseases and treat cancers [128,129]. These NPs are used to treat liver, breast, cervical, and lung carcinoma cancers [129].
The choice of plant materials in the green synthesis of Cu and CuO NPs should be based on scientific evidence. Although plants naturally contain phytochemicals that act as reducing, stabilizing, and capping agents, different plants have different contents. This clearly shows that a strong scientific background study on the taxonomy of plants is needed to understand the principle and function of these phytochemicals in green synthesis [130]. From Table 1, most of the studies have suggested that common active compounds, such as polyphenols and flavonoids, play crucial roles in green synthesis. However, other compounds, especially alkaloids, consist of more than 12,000 different cyclic nitrogen compounds that also coordinate the green synthesis process [131].
Fierascu et al. (2020) stated that research output on the green synthesis of metallic NPs has increased gradually every year; however, it is mostly focused on antimicrobials and less exploration in anticancer studies [132]. Although extensive in vitro studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of plant-derived synthesis of Cu and CuO NPs, these NPs are still far from clinical trials due to the limitation on in vivo data. Further in-depth investigation of the toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these NPs is essential prior to clinical study. Additionally, the underlying mechanisms of Cu/CuO NPs in different disease models need to be evaluated. The optimal size and morphology of NPs need to be taken into consideration for the best uptake. Despite these challenges, the current encouraging data suggest the potential of Cu and CuO NPs as nanomedicine for cancer therapy and other diseases in the future.

8. Conclusions

Advancement in the green synthesis of NPs has created a new approach in biomedical applications. Plant-synthesized Cu and CuO NPs have many attractive properties, such as antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and wound healing. It is important to note that the Cu/CuO NPs synthesized from different plants have different properties due to the diversity in metabolite composition. This diversity leads to variation in size, shape, and morphology of the NPs, which contributed to the alteration of their overall properties and activities. Additionally, further validation of the underlying mechanisms and pathways of Cu/CuO NPs at both the cellular and organism level is mandatory. Therefore, a comprehensive study on these NPs, including in vitro and in vivo assessments from different aspects, would drive their medicinal application. Although it seems that many trials and more research need to be conducted, the potential and prospects for developing Cu and CuO NPs as a future drug, especially in cancer therapy, are still very bright. The green technology of NPs, utilizing natural plant resources that will be developed into nanobiotechnology, is not very far off from a breakthrough.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.L., S.P.M.S., S.I., and N.M.A.; Writing—original draft preparation, D.L. and S.P.M.S.; writing—review and editing, D.L., S.P.M.S., S.I., N.M.A., and N.H.N.; visualization, S.P.M.S.; supervision, S.I., N.M.A., and N.H.N.; funding acquisition, N.M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education—Fundamental Research Grant Scheme FP027-2019A (FRGS/1/2019/STG05/UM/02/5) (N.M.A.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Riggio, C.; Pagni, E.; Raffa, V.; Cuschieri, A. Nano-oncology: Clinical application for cancer therapy and future perspectives. J. Nanomater. 2011, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Contado, C. Nanomaterials in consumer products: A challenging analytical problem. Front. Chem. 2015, 3, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Ibrahim, S.; Charinpanitkul, T.; Kobatake, E.; Sriyudthsak, M. Nanowires nickel oxide and nanospherical manganese oxide synthesized via low temperature hydrothermal technique for hydrogen peroxide sensor. J. Chem. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yasin, S.M.M.; Ibrahim, S.; Johan, M.R. Effect of zirconium oxide nanofiller and dibutyl phthalate plasticizer on ionic conductivity and optical properties of solid polymer electrolyte. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sangeetha, S.; Kalaignan, G.P.; Anthuvan, J.T. Pulse electrodeposition of self-lubricating Ni–W/PTFE nanocomposite coatings on mild steel surface. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 359, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sahooli, M.; Sabbaghi, S.; Saboori, R. Synthesis and characterization of mono sized CuO nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 2012, 81, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Safarifard, V.; Morsali, A. Sonochemical syntheses of a nano-sized copper(II) supramolecule as a precursor for the synthesis of copper(II) oxide nanoparticles. Ultrason Sonochem. 2012, 19, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pandiyarajan, T.; Udayabhaskar, R.; Vignesh, S.; James, R.A.; Karthikeyan, B. Synthesis and concentration dependent antibacterial activities of CuO nanoflakes. Mater Sci Eng. C. 2013, 33, 2020–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yahia, I.S.; Farag, A.A.M.; El-Faify, S.; Yakuphanoglu, F.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A. Synthesis, optical constants, optical dispersion parameters of CuO nanorods. Optik 2016, 127, 1429–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mohamed, R.M.; Harraz, F.A.; Shawky, A. CuO nanobelts synthesized by a template-free hydrothermal approach with optical and magnetic characteristics. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saif Hasan, S.; Singh, S.; Parikh, R.Y.; Dharne, M.S.; Patole, M.S.; Prasad, B.; Shouche, Y.S. Bacterial synthesis of copper/copper oxide nanoparticles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2008, 8, 3191–3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jiang, T.; Wang, Y.; Meng, D.; Yu, M. Facile synthesis and photocatalytic performance of self-assembly CuO microspheres. Superlattice. Microstruct. 2015, 85, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Karthik, A.; Geetha, K. Synthesis of Copper Precursor, Copper and its oxide Nanoparticles by Green Chemical Reduction Method and its Antimicrobial Activity. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 3, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dang, T.M.D.; Le, T.T.T.; Fribourg-Blanc, E.; Dang, M.C. Synthesis and optical properties of copper nanoparticles prepared by a chemical reduction method. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 015009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ealia, S.A.M.; Saravanakumar, M. A review on the classification, characterisation, synthesis of nanoparticles and their application. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 263, 032019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cele, T. Preparation of Nanoparticles. In Engineered Nanomaterials-Health and Safety; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu, Q.-M.; Zhou, D.-B.; Yamamoto, Y.; Ichino, R.; Okido, M. Preparation of Cu nanoparticles with NaBH4 by aqueous reduction method. Trans. Nonferr. Metals Soc. China 2012, 22, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, H.-T.; Lin, Y.-S.; Yin, Y.-S. A novel one-step chemical method for preparation of copper nanofluids. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 2004, 277, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Su, X.; Zhao, J.; Bala, H.; Zhu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ma, S.; Wang, Z. Fast synthesis of stable cubic copper nanocages in the aqueous phase. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 14689–14693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iravani, S. Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2638–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, P.V.; Pammi, S.; Kollu, P.; Satyanarayana, K.; Shameem, U. Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using Boerhaavia diffusa plant extract and their anti bacterial activity. Ind. Crops Prod. 2014, 52, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Khan, I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 908–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mandal, D.; Bolander, M.E.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Sarkar, G.; Mukherjee, P. The use of microorganisms for the formation of metal nanoparticles and their application. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 69, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kowshik, M.; Ashtaputre, S.; Kharrazi, S.; Vogel, W.; Urban, J.; Kulkarni, S.K.; Paknikar, K. Extracellular synthesis of silver nanoparticles by a silver-tolerant yeast strain MKY3. Nanotechnology 2002, 14, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mukherjee, P.; Ahmad, A.; Mandal, D.; Senapati, S.; Sainkar, S.R.; Khan, M.I.; Parishcha, R.; Ajaykumar, P.; Alam, M.; Kumar, R. Fungus-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their immobilization in the mycelial matrix: A novel biological approach to nanoparticle synthesis. Nano Lett. 2001, 1, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chaudhary, R.; Nawaz, K.; Khan, A.K.; Hano, C.; Abbasi, B.H.; Anjum, S. An Overview of the Algae-Mediated Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles and Their Biomedical Applications. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Spadaro, D.; Gullino, M.L. Improving the efficacy of biocontrol agents against soilborne pathogens. Crop Protect. 2005, 24, 601–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bukhari, S.I.; Hamed, M.M.; Al-Agamy, M.H.; Gazwi, H.S.; Radwan, H.H.; Youssif, A.M. Biosynthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Using Streptomyces MHM38 and Its Biological Applications. J. Nanomater. 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, V.V.; Nithya, S.; Shyam, A.; Subramanian, N.S.; Anthuvan, J.T.; Anthony, S.P. Natural amino acid based phenolic derivatives for synthesizing silver nanoparticles with tunable morphology and antibacterial studies. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 2702–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ibrahim, S.; Jakaria, N.Z.; Rozali, S.; Ghazali, N.N.N.; Ab Karim, M.S.; Sabri, M.F.M. Biosynthesis of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Using Camellia Sinensis Plant Powder. In Advances in Material Sciences and Engineering; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.W.; Yang, Q.; Zhou, T.; Shi, M.F.; Sun, C.X.; Gao, X.X.; Cheng, Y.Q.; Cui, X.G.; Sun, Y.H. Cuprous oxide nanoparticles inhibit prostate cancer by attenuating the stemness of cancer cells via inhibition of the Wnt signaling pathway. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2569–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ammara, S.; Shamaila, S.; Bokhari, A.; Sabah, A. Nonenzymatic glucose sensor with high performance electrodeposited nickel/copper/carbon nanotubes nanocomposite electrode. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2018, 120, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Verma, N.; Kumar, N. Synthesis and biomedical applications of copper oxide nanoparticles: An expanding horizon. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 1170–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jeffree, A.I.; Karman, S.; Ibrahim, S.; Ab Karim, M.S.; Rozali, S. Biosensors Approach for Lung Cancer Diagnosis—A Review. In RITA 2018; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 425–435. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jia, B.; Mei, Y.; Cheng, L.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, L. Preparation of copper nanoparticles coated cellulose films with antibacterial properties through one-step reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 2897–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Duan, Z.; Ma, G.; Zhang, W. Preparation of copper nanoparticles and catalytic properties for the reduction of aromatic nitro compounds. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 4003–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Vijay, M.; Anu, Y. Anticancer activity of camellia Sinensis mediated copper nanoparticles against HT-29, MCF-7, and MOLT-4 human cancer cell lines. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2017, 10, 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  38. Santini, C.; Pellei, M.; Gandin, V.; Porchia, M.; Tisato, F.; Marzano, C. Advances in copper complexes as anticancer agents. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 815–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Maqbool, Q.; Iftikhar, S.; Nazar, M.; Abbas, F.; Saleem, A.; Hussain, T.; Kausar, R.; Anwaar, S.; Jabeen, N. Green fabricated CuO nanobullets via Olea europaea leaf extract shows auspicious antimicrobial potential. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2016, 11, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mohammed, W.M.; Mubark, T.H.; Al-Haddad, R. Effect of CuO nanoparticles on antimicrobial activity prepared by sol-gel method. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2018, 13, 10559–10562. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jurj, A.; Braicu, C.; Pop, L.-A.; Tomuleasa, C.; Gherman, C.D.; Berindan-Neagoe, I. The new era of nanotechnology, an alternative to change cancer treatment. Drug Design Dev. Ther. 2017, 11, 2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Vaid, P.; Raizada, P.; Saini, A.K.; Saini, R.V. Biogenic silver, gold and copper nanoparticles-A sustainable green chemistry approach for cancer therapy. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2020, 16, 100247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Singh, S.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, M.; Agarwal, A.; Mizaikoff, B. Electrochemical sensing and remediation of 4-nitrophenol using bio-synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 313, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Sajadi, S.M.; Rostami-Vartooni, A.; Hussin, S.M. Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles using aqueous extract of Thymus vulgaris L. leaves and their catalytic performance for N-arylation of indoles and amines. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 2016, 466, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, H.T.; Zheng, S.M.; Xiong, H.F.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Niu, X.L. Biosynthesis of copperoxide nanoparticles using Abies spectabilis plant extract and analyzing its antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory potency in various mice models. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 6995–7006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ijaz, F.; Shahid, S.; Khan, S.A.; Ahmad, W.; Zaman, S. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Abutilon indicum leaf extract: Antimicrobial, antioxidant and photocatalytic dye degradation activitie. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2017, 16, 743–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Awwad, A.; Amer, M. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Ailanthus altissima leaf extract and antibacterial activity. Chem. Int. 2020, 6, 210–217. [Google Scholar]
  48. Elemike, E.E.; Onwudiwe, D.C.; Singh, M. Eco-friendly synthesis of copper oxide, zinc oxide and copper oxide–zinc oxide nanocomposites, and their anticancer applications. J. Inorgan. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020, 30, 400–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, H.W.; Su, H.T.; Ahmeda, A.; Sun, Y.Q.; Li, Z.Y.; Zangeneh, M.M.; Nowrozi, M.; Zangeneh, A.; Moradi, R. Biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles using Allium eriophyllum Boiss leaf aqueous extract; characterization and analysis of their antimicrobial and cutaneous wound-healing potentials. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tahvilian, R.; Zangeneh, M.M.; Falahi, H.; Sadrjavadi, K.; Jalalvand, A.R.; Zangeneh, A. Green synthesis and chemical characterization of copper nanoparticles using Allium saralicum leaves and assessment of their cytotoxicity, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cutaneous wound healing properties. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 33, e5234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Velsankar, K.; Kumar, R.M.A.; Preethi, R.; Muthulakshmi, V.; Sudhahar, S. Green synthesis of CuO nanoparticles via Allium sativum extract and its characterizations on antimicrobial, antioxidant, antilarvicidal activities. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sukumar, K.; Arumugam, S.; Thangaswamy, S.; Balakrishnan, S.; Chinnappan, S.; Kandasamy, S. Eco-friendly cost-effective approach for synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Optik 2020, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dey, A.; Manna, S.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Mondal, D.; Chattopadhyay, D.; Raj, A.; Das, S.; Bag, B.G.; Roy, S. Azadirachta indica leaves mediated green synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles induce apoptosis through activation of TNF-alpha and caspases signaling pathway against cancer cells. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2019, 23, 222–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rehana, D.; Mahendiran, D.; Kumar, R.S.; Rahiman, A.K. Evaluation of antioxidant and anticancer activity of copper oxide nanoparticles synthesized using medicinally important plant extracts. Biomed. Pharmacother. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 89, 1067–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sundaram, C.S.; Kumar, J.S.; Kumar, S.S.; Ramesh, P.L.N.; Zin, T.; Rao, U.S.M. Antibacterial and anticancer potential of Brassica oleracea var acephala using biosynthesised copper nanoparticles. Med. J. Malaysia 2020, 75, 677–684. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chandrasekaran, R.; Yadav, S.A.; Sivaperumal, S. Phytosynthesis and Characterization of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles using the Aqueous Extract of Beta vulgaris L and Evaluation of their Antibacterial and Anticancer Activities. J. Cluster Sci. 2020, 31, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kumari, P.; Panda, P.K.; Jha, E.; Kumari, K.; Nisha, K.; Mallick, M.A.; Verma, S.K. Mechanistic insight to ROS and apoptosis regulated cytotoxicity inferred by green synthesized CuO nanoparticles from Calotropis gigantea to embryonic zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kumari, P.; Panda, P.K.; Jha, E.; Pramanik, N.; Nisha, K.; Kumari, K.; Soni, N.; Mallick, M.A.; Verma, S.K. Molecular insight to In Vitro biocompatibility of phytofabricated copper oxide nanoparticles with human embryonic kidney cells. Nanomedicine 2018, 13, 2415–2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Fardood, S.T.; Ramazani, A. Black tea extract mediated green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles. J. Appl. Chem. Res. 2018, 12, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  60. Kiranmai, M.; Kadimcharla, K.; Keesara, N.R.; Fatima, S.N.; Bommena, P.; Batchu, U.R. Green synthesis of stable copper nanoparticles and synergistic activity with antibiotics. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 79, 695–700. [Google Scholar]
  61. Rajeshkumar, S.; Menon, S.; Kumar, S.V.; Tambuwala, M.M.; Bakshi, H.A.; Mehta, M.; Satija, S.; Gupta, G.; Chellappan, D.K.; Thangavelu, L. Antibacterial and antioxidant potential of biosynthesized copper nanoparticles mediated through Cissus arnotiana plant extract. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 197, 111531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, S.; Rajeshkumar, S.; Madasamy, M.; Mahendran, V. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Cissus vitiginea and its antioxidant and antibacterial activity against urinary tract infection pathogens. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2020, 48, 1153–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tshireletso, P.; Ateba, C.N.; Fayemi, O.E. Spectroscopic and Antibacterial Properties of CuONPs from Orange, Lemon and Tangerine Peel Extracts: Potential for Combating Bacterial Resistance. Molecules 2021, 26, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Prakash, S.; Elavarasan, N.; Venkatesan, A.; Subashini, K.; Sowndharya, M.; Sujatha, V. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and its effective applications in Biginelli reaction, BTB photodegradation and antibacterial activity. Adv. Powder Technol. 2018, 29, 3315–3326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chung, I.M.; Abdul Rahuman, A.; Marimuthu, S.; Vishnu Kirthi, A.; Anbarasan, K.; Padmini, P.; Rajakumar, G. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles using Eclipta prostrata leaves extract and their antioxidant and cytotoxic activities. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 14, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Ali, K.; Saquib, Q.; Ahmed, B.; Siddiqui, M.A.; Ahmad, J.; Al-Shaeri, M.; Al-Khedhairy, A.A.; Musarrat, J. Bio-functionalized CuO nanoparticles induced apoptotic activities in human breast carcinoma cells and toxicity against Aspergillus flavus: An In Vitro approach. Process. Biochem. 2020, 91, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sackey, J.; Nwanya, A.; Bashir, A.; Matinise, N.; Ngilirabanga, J.; Ameh, A.; Coetsee, E.; Maaza, M. Electrochemical properties of Euphorbia pulcherrima mediated copper oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 244, 122714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zangeneh, M.M.; Ghaneialvar, H.; Akbaribazm, M.; Ghanimatdan, M.; Abbasi, N.; Goorani, S.; Pirabbasi, E.; Zangeneh, A. Novel synthesis of Falcaria vulgaris leaf extract conjugated copper nanoparticles with potent cytotoxicity, antioxidant, antifungal, antibacterial, and cutaneous wound healing activities under In Vitro and In Vivo condition. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019, 197, 111556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sankar, R.; Maheswari, R.; Karthik, S.; Shivashangari, K.S.; Ravikumar, V. Anticancer activity of Ficus religiosa engineered copper oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 44, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kalaiarasi, A.; Sankar, R.; Anusha, C.; Saravanan, K.; Aarthy, K.; Karthic, S.; Mathuram, T.L.; Ravikumar, V. Copper oxide nanoparticles induce anticancer activity in A549 lung cancer cells by inhibition of histone deacetylase. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 40, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hemmati, S.; Ahmeda, A.; Salehabadi, Y.; Zangeneh, A.; Zangeneh, M.M. Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of cytotoxicity, antioxidant, antifungal, antibacterial, and cutaneous wound healing effects of copper nanoparticles using the aqueous extract of Strawberry fruit and L-Ascorbic acid. Polyhedron 2020, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vishveshvar, K.; Krishnan, M.A.; Haribabu, K.; Vishnuprasad, S. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Ixiro coccinea plant leaves and its characterization. BioNanoScience 2018, 8, 554–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Fardood, S.T.; Ramazani, A.; Asiabi, P.; Joo, S. A novel green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using a henna extract powder. J. Struct. Chem. 2018, 59, 1737–1743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Santhosh Kumar, J.; Shanmugam, V. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles from magnolia champaca floral extract and its antioxidant & toxicity assay using Danio Rerio. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2020, 8, 5444–5449. [Google Scholar]
  75. Kiriyanthan, R.M.; Sharmili, S.A.; Balaji, R.; Jayashree, S.; Mahboob, S.; Al-Ghanim, K.A.; Al-Misned, F.; Ahmed, Z.; Govindarajan, M.; Vaseeharan, B. Photocatalytic, antiproliferative and antimicrobial properties of copper nanoparticles synthesized using Manilkara zapota leaf extract: A photodynamic approach. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2020, 32, 102058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Thiruvengadam, M.; Chung, I.-M.; Gomathi, T.; Ansari, M.A.; Khanna, V.G.; Babu, V.; Rajakumar, G. Synthesis, characterization and pharmacological potential of green synthesized copper nanoparticles. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 42, 1769–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rajamma, R.; Gopalakrishnan Nair, S.; Abdul Khadar, F.; Baskaran, B. Antibacterial and anticancer activity of biosynthesised CuO nanoparticles. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2020, 14, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sulaiman, G.M.; Tawfeeq, A.T.; Jaaffer, M.D. Biogenic synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using olea europaea leaf extract and evaluation of their toxicity activities: An In Vivo and In Vitro study. Biotechnol. Prog. 2018, 34, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nagajyothi, P.; Muthuraman, P.; Sreekanth, T.; Kim, D.H.; Shim, J. Green synthesis: In-Vitro anticancer activity of copper oxide nanoparticles against human cervical carcinoma cells. Arab. J. Chem. 2017, 10, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Berra, D.; Laouini, S.; Benhaoua, B.; Ouahrani, M.; Berrani, D.; Rahal, A. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles by Pheonix dactylifera L leaves extract. Digest J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2018, 13, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar]
  81. Nagaraj, E.; Karuppannan, K.; Shanmugam, P.; Venugopal, S. Exploration of Bio-synthesized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Using Pterolobium hexapetalum Leaf Extract by Photocatalytic Activity and Biological Evaluations. J. Cluster Sci. 2019, 30, 1157–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mary, A.A.; Ansari, A.T.; Subramanian, R. Sugarcane juice mediated synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles, characterization and their antibacterial activity. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2019, 31, 1103–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Khatami, M.; Varma, R.S.; Heydari, M.; Peydayesh, M.; Sedighi, A.; Agha Askari, H.; Rohani, M.; Baniasadi, M.; Arkia, S.; Seyedi, F. Copper oxide nanoparticles greener synthesis using tea and its antifungal efficiency on Fusarium solani. Geomicrobiol. J. 2019, 36, 777–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Yugandhar, P.; Vasavi, T.; Devi, P.U.M.; Savithramma, N. Bioinspired green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles from Syzygium alternifolium (Wt.) Walp: Characterization and evaluation of its synergistic antimicrobial and anticancer activity. Appl. Nanosci. 2017, 7, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Akhter, S.M.H.; Mohammad, F.; Ahmad, S. Terminalia belerica mediated green synthesis of nanoparticles of copper, iron and zinc metal oxides as the alternate antibacterial agents against some common pathogens. BioNanoScience 2019, 9, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gopinath, V.; Priyadarshini, S.; Al-Maleki, A.; Alagiri, M.; Yahya, R.; Saravanan, S.; Vadivelu, J. In Vitro toxicity, apoptosis and antimicrobial effects of phyto-mediated copper oxide nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 110986–110995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Selvan, S.M.; Anand, K.V.; Govindaraju, K.; Tamilselvan, S.; Kumar, V.G.; Subramanian, K.S.; Kannan, M.; Raja, K. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and mosquito larvicidal activity against dengue, zika and chikungunya causing vector Aedes aegypti. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 12, 1042–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Minelli, C.; Shard, A.G. Chemical measurements of polyethylene glycol shells on gold nanoparticles in the presence of aggregation. Biointerphases 2016, 11, 04B306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Mourdikoudis, S.; Pallares, R.M.; Thanh, N.T. Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: Comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 12871–12934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Murthy, H.A.; Abebe, B.; Prakash, C.; Shantaveerayya, K. A review on green synthesis of Cu and CuO nanomaterials for multifunctional applications. Mater. Sci. Res. India 2018, 15, 279–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Singh, J.; Dutta, T.; Kim, K.-H.; Rawat, M.; Samddar, P.; Kumar, P. ‘Green’synthesis of metals and their oxide nanoparticles: Applications for environmental remediation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Khanehzaei, H.; Ahmad, M.B.; Shameli, K.; Ajdari, Z. Synthesis and characterization of Cu@Cu2O core shell nanoparticles prepared in seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii Media. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2014, 9, 8189–8198. [Google Scholar]
  93. Sampaio, S.; Viana, J.C. Optimisation of the green synthesis of Cu/Cu2O particles for maximum yield production and reduced oxidation for electronic applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 263, 114807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Thanuja, J.; Nagaraju, G.; Naika, H.R. Biosynthesis of Cu4O3 nanoparticles using Razma seeds: Application to antibacterial and cytotoxicity activities. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Tran, T.H.; Nguyen, V.T. Copper oxide nanomaterials prepared by solution methods, some properties, and potential applications: A brief review. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Joshi, A.; Sharma, A.; Bachheti, R.K.; Husen, A.; Mishra, V.K. Plant-mediated synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles and their biological applications. In Nanomaterials and Plant Potential; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 221–237. [Google Scholar]
  97. Patra, J.K.; Baek, K.-H. Green nanobiotechnology: Factors affecting synthesis and characterization techniques. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Rajendran, K.; Sen, S. Optimization of process parameters for the rapid biosynthesis of hematite nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2016, 159, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Baer, D. Surface Characterization of Nanoparticles: Critical needs and significant challenges. J. Surf. Anal. 2011, 17, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Saif, S.; Tahir, A.; Chen, Y. Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles and their environmental applications and implications. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Mudunkotuwa, I.A.; Pettibone, J.M.; Grassian, V.H. Environmental implications of nanoparticle aging in the processing and fate of copper-based nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 7001–7010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Park, Y.; Hong, Y.; Weyers, A.; Kim, Y.; Linhardt, R. Polysaccharides and phytochemicals: A natural reservoir for the green synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 5, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fazlzadeh, M.; Rahmani, K.; Zarei, A.; Abdoallahzadeh, H.; Nasiri, F.; Khosravi, R. A novel green synthesis of zero valent iron nanoparticles (NZVI) using three plant extracts and their efficient application for removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions. Adv. Powder Technol. 2017, 28, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sanjini, N.; Winston, B.; Velmathi, S. Effect of precursors on the synthesis of CuO nanoparticles under microwave for photocatalytic activity towards methylene blue and rhodamine B dyes. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2017, 17, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Phiwdang, K.; Suphankij, S.; Mekprasart, W.; Pecharapa, W. Synthesis of CuO nanoparticles by precipitation method using different precursors. Energy Proc. 2013, 34, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Asemani, M.; Anarjan, N. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using Juglans regia leaf extract and assessment of their physico-chemical and biological properties. Green Process. Synth. 2019, 8, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Akintelu, S.A.; Folorunso, A.S.; Folorunso, F.A.; Oyebamiji, A.K. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles for biomedical application and environmental remediation. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rajesh, K.; Ajitha, B.; Reddy, Y.A.K.; Suneetha, Y.; Reddy, P.S. Synthesis of copper nanoparticles and role of pH on particle size control. Mater. Today Proc. 2016, 3, 1985–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Singh, Z.; Singh, I. Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Synthesized at Different pH Pose Varied Genotoxic Effects in Allium cepa. Asian J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Madhubala, V.; Kalaivani, T. Phyto and hydrothermal synthesis of Fe3O4@ ZnO core-shell nanoparticles using Azadirachta indica and its cytotoxicity studies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 449, 584–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Preeth, D.R.; Shairam, M.; Suganya, N.; Hootan, R.; Kartik, R.; Pierre, K.; Suvro, C.; Rajalakshmi, S. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using sinapic acid: An underpinning step towards antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer. J. Biol. Inorgan. Chem. 2019, 24, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sukumar, S.; Rudrasenan, A.; Padmanabhan Nambiar, D. Green-Synthesized Rice-Shaped Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Using Caesalpinia bonducella Seed Extract and Their Applications. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 1040–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Sok, S.P.M.; Arshad, N.M.; Azmi, M.N.; Awang, K.; Ozpolat, B.; Hasima Nagoor, N. The apoptotic effect of 1′S-1′-Acetoxychavicol Acetate (ACA) enhanced by inhibition of non-canonical autophagy in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Zakaria, N.; Mahdzir, M.A.; Yusoff, M.; Mohd Arshad, N.; Awang, K.; Nagoor, N.H. Cytotoxic Effects of Pinnatane a Extracted from Walsura pinnata (Meliaceae) on Human Liver Cancer Cells. Molecules 2018, 23, 2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Riss, T.L.; Moravec, R.A.; Niles, A.L.; Duellman, S.; Benink, H.A.; Worzella, T.J.; Minor, L. Cell viability assays. In Assay Guidance Manual; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  116. Perillo, B.; Di Donato, M.; Pezone, A.; Di Zazzo, E.; Giovannelli, P.; Galasso, G.; Castoria, G.; Migliaccio, A. ROS in cancer therapy: The bright side of the moon. Exp. Mol. Med. 2020, 52, 192–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hayes, J.D.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Tew, K.D. Oxidative stress in cancer. Cancer Cell 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Duman, F.; Ocsoy, I.; Kup, F.O. Chamomile flower extract-directed CuO nanoparticle formation for its antioxidant and DNA cleavage properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 60, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Siivola, K.M.; Suhonen, S.; Hartikainen, M.; Catalán, J.; Norppa, H. Genotoxicity and cellular uptake of nanosized and fine copper oxide particles in human bronchial epithelial cells In Vitro. Mutat. Res. 2020, 856–857, 503217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. He, Z.L.; Yang, X.E.; Stoffella, P.J. Trace elements in agroecosystems and impacts on the environment. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 19, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pfeffer, C.M.; Singh, A.T. Apoptosis: A target for anticancer therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Liu, H.; Lai, W.; Liu, X.; Yang, H.; Fang, Y.; Tian, L.; Li, K.; Nie, H.; Zhang, W.; Shi, Y.; et al. Exposure to copper oxide nanoparticles triggers oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-stress induced toxicology and apoptosis in male rat liver and BRL-3A cell. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Soria, N.G.C.; Aga, D.S.; Atilla-Gokcumen, G.E. Lipidomics reveals insights on the biological effects of copper oxide nanoparticles in a human colon carcinoma cell line. Mol. Omics 2019, 15, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Laha, D.; Pramanik, A.; Maity, J.; Mukherjee, A.; Pramanik, P.; Laskar, A.; Karmakar, P. Interplay between autophagy and apoptosis mediated by copper oxide nanoparticles in human breast cancer cells MCF7. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2014, 1840, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Tao, X.; Wan, X.; Wu, D.; Song, E.; Song, Y. A tandem activation of NLRP3 inflammasome induced by copper oxide nanoparticles and dissolved copper ion in J774A.1 macrophage. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 411, 125134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jahangirian, H.; Lemraski, E.G.; Webster, T.J.; Rafiee-Moghaddam, R.; Abdollahi, Y. A review of drug delivery systems based on nanotechnology and green chemistry: Green nanomedicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Lam, P.L.; Wong, W.Y.; Bian, Z.; Chui, C.H.; Gambari, R. Recent advances in green nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery: Efficient delivery and safety concern. Nanomedicine 2017, 12, 357–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; del Pilar Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Navya, P.; Kaphle, A.; Srinivas, S.; Bhargava, S.K.; Rotello, V.M.; Daima, H.K. Current trends and challenges in cancer management and therapy using designer nanomaterials. Nano Converg. 2019, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Varghese, R.J.; Zikalala, N.; Oluwafemi, O.S. Green synthesis protocol on metal oxide nanoparticles using plant extracts. In Colloidal Metal Oxide Nanoparticles; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 67–82. [Google Scholar]
  131. Crozier, A.; Clifford, M.N.; Ashihara, H. Plant. Secondary Metabolites: Occurrence, Structure and Role in the Human Diet; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  132. Fierascu, I.; Fierascu, I.C.; Brazdis, R.I.; Baroi, A.M.; Fistos, T.; Fierascu, R.C. Phytosynthesized Metallic Nanoparticles—between Nanomedicine and Toxicology. A Brief Review of 2019’s Findings. Materials 2020, 13, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 11 00564 g001 550
Figure 1. Conventional methods used for nanoparticle synthesis.
Figure 1. Conventional methods used for nanoparticle synthesis.
Biomolecules 11 00564 g001
Biomolecules 11 00564 g002 550
Figure 2. Plant-based synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles. The boiling of respective parts of the plant can be used to extract biomolecules from the plant. The resulted filtrate is the plant extract, which can reduce the copper precursor to synthesize copper/copper oxide nanoparticles (Cu/CuO NPs). The biomolecules’ presence in plant extracts serves as reducing, stabilizing, and capping agents in Cu/CuO NP synthesis.
Figure 2. Plant-based synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles. The boiling of respective parts of the plant can be used to extract biomolecules from the plant. The resulted filtrate is the plant extract, which can reduce the copper precursor to synthesize copper/copper oxide nanoparticles (Cu/CuO NPs). The biomolecules’ presence in plant extracts serves as reducing, stabilizing, and capping agents in Cu/CuO NP synthesis.
Biomolecules 11 00564 g002
Biomolecules 11 00564 g003 550
Figure 3. Characterization of synthesized copper/copper oxide nanoparticles (Cu/CuO NPs). (a) Transmission microscopy image of CuO NPs synthesized from Syzygium alternifolium (Wt.) Walp [84]. (b,c) Scanning electron microscopy image (SEM) (b) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy EDS (c) of Cu NPs synthesized using Cissus vitiginea leaf extract [62].
Figure 3. Characterization of synthesized copper/copper oxide nanoparticles (Cu/CuO NPs). (a) Transmission microscopy image of CuO NPs synthesized from Syzygium alternifolium (Wt.) Walp [84]. (b,c) Scanning electron microscopy image (SEM) (b) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy EDS (c) of Cu NPs synthesized using Cissus vitiginea leaf extract [62].
Biomolecules 11 00564 g003
Biomolecules 11 00564 g004 550
Figure 4. Graphical representation of the proposed mechanism for antibacterial activity in response to copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs). (1) Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria have different cell wall compositions, which can be destroyed by CuO NPs. This cell wall damage results in bacteria lysis. Internalization of CuO NPs eventually releases Cu2+ ions in the cytosol, leading to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in the bacteria and, subsequently, DNA and mitochondria damage. Alternatively, CuO NPs may release Cu2+ ions and permeate into the cells to stimulate the cellular response that contributes to bactericidal activity.
Figure 4. Graphical representation of the proposed mechanism for antibacterial activity in response to copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs). (1) Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria have different cell wall compositions, which can be destroyed by CuO NPs. This cell wall damage results in bacteria lysis. Internalization of CuO NPs eventually releases Cu2+ ions in the cytosol, leading to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation in the bacteria and, subsequently, DNA and mitochondria damage. Alternatively, CuO NPs may release Cu2+ ions and permeate into the cells to stimulate the cellular response that contributes to bactericidal activity.
Biomolecules 11 00564 g004
Biomolecules 11 00564 g005 550
Figure 5. Graphical representation of the proposed mechanism for antifungal activity in response to copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs). The CuO NPs distorted the cell wall of fungus such as Aspergillus flavus. Internalization of these particles induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which resulted in DNA and mitochondrial damage that contribute to the antifungal activity. Alternatively, the antifungal activity of CuO NPs may be attributed to their antioxidant property.
Figure 5. Graphical representation of the proposed mechanism for antifungal activity in response to copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs). The CuO NPs distorted the cell wall of fungus such as Aspergillus flavus. Internalization of these particles induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, which resulted in DNA and mitochondrial damage that contribute to the antifungal activity. Alternatively, the antifungal activity of CuO NPs may be attributed to their antioxidant property.
Biomolecules 11 00564 g005
Biomolecules 11 00564 g006 550
Figure 6. Graphical representation of the proposed mechanism for anticancer activity in response to CuO NPs (referring to plant-based NPs, unless stated otherwise). (1) Mitochondrial damage and intrinsic apoptosis. CuO NPs from plants suppressed Bcl-2 (antiapoptotic protein). They promoted Bak/Bax (proapoptotic protein) expression to induce mitochondria membrane permeabilization, followed by the release of cytochrome c. This cytochrome c, together with the Apaf-1 adaptor and pro-caspase-9, forms apoptosome. The activated caspase-9 triggers apoptosis via caspase-3 and caspase-7. (2) Antioxidation/ROS generation. Anticancer effects of CuO NPs often demonstrate an antioxidant property. Conversely, the elevation of intracellular ROS levels in response to CuO NP treatment was reported. (3) DNA damage. The CuO-NP-inducible intracellular ROS generation rendered DNA damage, which upregulated the expression of p53 and p21, which is responsible for apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. (4) Histone deacetylases (HDACs). The treatment of CuO NPs decreased the total amount of histone deacetylases, which may account for the increased mRNA and protein levels of p53 and p21. (5) Oncogenes. The mRNA and protein levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were downregulated in response to CuO NPs, which may protect against angiogenesis and inflammation. (6) Extrinsic apoptosis. Alternatively, CuO NPs and other stimuli can activate the extrinsic apoptosis by interacting with the death receptor on the cell membrane to recruit caspase-8. The activated caspase-8 processed caspase-3 and caspase-7 to induce apoptosis. (7) ER-stress-induced apoptosis. Commercial CuO NPs initiated apoptosis via ER-stress-associated caspase-12. (8) Autophagy. Commercial CuO NPs induced autophagy with a high expression of LC3-II and ATG5, acting as a defense response against the treatment. Dark red box indicates the predicted mechanism based on the evidence of commercial CuO NPs.
Figure 6. Graphical representation of the proposed mechanism for anticancer activity in response to CuO NPs (referring to plant-based NPs, unless stated otherwise). (1) Mitochondrial damage and intrinsic apoptosis. CuO NPs from plants suppressed Bcl-2 (antiapoptotic protein). They promoted Bak/Bax (proapoptotic protein) expression to induce mitochondria membrane permeabilization, followed by the release of cytochrome c. This cytochrome c, together with the Apaf-1 adaptor and pro-caspase-9, forms apoptosome. The activated caspase-9 triggers apoptosis via caspase-3 and caspase-7. (2) Antioxidation/ROS generation. Anticancer effects of CuO NPs often demonstrate an antioxidant property. Conversely, the elevation of intracellular ROS levels in response to CuO NP treatment was reported. (3) DNA damage. The CuO-NP-inducible intracellular ROS generation rendered DNA damage, which upregulated the expression of p53 and p21, which is responsible for apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. (4) Histone deacetylases (HDACs). The treatment of CuO NPs decreased the total amount of histone deacetylases, which may account for the increased mRNA and protein levels of p53 and p21. (5) Oncogenes. The mRNA and protein levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 were downregulated in response to CuO NPs, which may protect against angiogenesis and inflammation. (6) Extrinsic apoptosis. Alternatively, CuO NPs and other stimuli can activate the extrinsic apoptosis by interacting with the death receptor on the cell membrane to recruit caspase-8. The activated caspase-8 processed caspase-3 and caspase-7 to induce apoptosis. (7) ER-stress-induced apoptosis. Commercial CuO NPs initiated apoptosis via ER-stress-associated caspase-12. (8) Autophagy. Commercial CuO NPs induced autophagy with a high expression of LC3-II and ATG5, acting as a defense response against the treatment. Dark red box indicates the predicted mechanism based on the evidence of commercial CuO NPs.
Biomolecules 11 00564 g006
Table
Table 1. Summary of plant-derived Cu and CuO nanoparticles biosynthesized.
Table 1. Summary of plant-derived Cu and CuO nanoparticles biosynthesized.
Plant Used
(Common Name)		Parts of PlantPlant Metabolites Involved in BioreductionPrecursorTmp.
(°C)		pHTime of ReactionCu/CuO NPsReference
Size (nm)Shapes
Abies spectabilis
(East Himalayan fir)		LeavesTerpenoids, flavonoids, lignans, steroids, and phenolsCuSO427nil2 h50Spherical[45]
Abutilon indicum
(Indian mallow)		LeavesPhenols and flavonoidCu(NO3)2·3H2O400 ± 5
(Burned)		nil2–5 min16.78Spherical[46]
Ailanthus altissima
(Varnish tree)		LeavesProteins, phenols, and alkenesCu(OAc)227nil4 h5–20Spherical[47]
Alchornea cordifolia
(Christmas Bush)		LeavesPhenols, steroids, tannins, alkaloids, flavonoids, and xanthonesCuSO4·5H2O80–90 °Cnil4 h16.25Spherical[48]
Allium eriophyllum Boiss
(Kurdish traditional medicine plant)		LeavesNeophytadiene and stigmast-5-en-3-olCuSO480nil16 h30–35Spherical[49]
Allium saralicumLeavesLinolenic acid and methyl esterCuSO4nil12>1 h45–50Spherical[50]
Allium sativum
(Garlic)		BulbPolypenols and saponinCu(NO3)270nil2–3 h20–40Spherical and oval-shaped[51]
Annona muricata
(Soursop)		LeavesFlavonoids and phenolsCuSO4·5H2O8012nil30–40Spherical and cubical[52]
Azadirachta indica
(Neem tree)		LeavesPhenols, flavonoids, carbohydrate, and saponinCuSO427nilnil36 ± 8Spherical[53]
Azadirachta indica
(Neem tree)		LeavesPhenols and flavonoidsCu(OAc)2·4H2O80nilnil12Spherical[54]
Brassica oleracea var acephala
(Kale)		leavesFlavanoids, tannins, terpenoids, and phytosterolsCuSO427nil15 min60–100Spherical[55]
Beta vulgaris
(Beet)		LeavesAlcohol and phenolCuSO4·5H2O60nil30 h11.4–63.9Spherical and irregular[56]
Calotropis gigantea
(Crown flower)		FloralFlavonol glycosides, cardenolides, saccharides, and lipidsCuCl237nil24 h25–35Spherical[57]
Calotropis gigantean
(Crown flower)		FloralPolysaccharides, proteins, and lipidsCuCl237nil24 h32 ± 0.9Spherical[58]
Camellia sinensis
(Black tea)		LeavesPolyphenols and epigallocatechin gallateCu(NO3)2·3H2O75nil12 h22–39Spherical[59]
Camellia sinensis
(Green tea)		LeavesPolyphenolsCuSO4·5H2O95nilnil67–99Spherical[60]
Camellia sinensis
(Green tea)		LeavesPolyphenolsCuCl2·2H2O90nilnil10–40Spherical[37]
Cissus arnottianaLeavesBiomoleculesCuSO427nil4 h60–90Spherical[61]
Cissus vitiginea
(South Indian treebine)		LeavesPolyphenol, anthroquinone, steroids, terpenoids, and tanninsCuSO427nilnil5–20Spherical[62]
Citrus
(Orange, lemon, tangerine)		Peel of fruitPhenolCu(NO3)2⋅5H2O80nil1 h48–76Globular[63]
Cordia sebestena
(Geiger tree)		FloralPolyphenols, flavonoids, and tanninsCu(NO3)2⋅3H2O80nil4 h20–35Spherical[64]
Eclipta prostrate
(False daisy)		LeavesSteroids, triterpenes, and flavonoids,Cu(OAc)250630 min23–57Spherical[65]
Eucalyptus globulus
(Southern blue gum)		LeavesPhenol, terpenoids, flavonoids, and tanninsCuSO430–14082–6 h12–68Cuboidal, spherical, and oval-shaped[66]
Euphorbia pulcherrima
(Poinsettia)		FloralFlavonoids and amino acidsCu(OAc)2·H2O274nil16.3–153.7Cubical[67]
Falcaria vulgaris
(Sickleweed; longleaf)		LeavesCarvacrol and spathulenolCuSO4nil12>1 h20Spherical[68]
Ficus religiosa
(Sacred fig)		LeavesAlkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoidsCuSO4·5H2O27nilnil577Spherical[69]
Ficus religiosa
(Sacred fig)		LeavesAlkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoidsCuSO427nilnil577Spherical[70]
Fragaria ananassa
(Strawberry)		FruitFlavonol, tannins, and anthocyaninsCuSO42781 h10–30Spherical[71]
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
(Chinese hibiscus)		LeavesPhenols and
flavonoids		Cu(OAc)2·4H2O80nilnil12Spherical[54]
Ixoro coccinea
(Jungle geranium)		LeavesPhenols and alcoholsCuSO4·5H2O27nil24 h80–110Spherical[72]
Lawsonia inermis
(Henna)		LeavesHennotannic acid (naphthoquinone), mannitol, and alkaloidsCu(NO3)2⋅3H2O80nil12 h22–38Spherical[73]
Magnolia champaca
(Champak)		FloralStarch, flavanol glycosides, and phenolCu(OAc)237nil24 h20–40Spherical[74]
Manilkara zapota
(Sapodilla)		LeavesTriterpenoids, flavonoid glycosides, and polyphenolCuSO4·5H2O10012Until color change to brownish-black18.9–45.2Spherical[75]
Millettia pinnata (Seashore Mempari; Pongam)FlowerProteins, acids, flavonoids, polyphenols, carboxylic acid, and alkaloidsCu2(OAc)4(H2O)225 and 60nilnil23 ± 1.10Spherical[76]
Moringa oleifera
(Drumstick tree)		LeavesPhenols and
flavonoids		Cu(OAc)2·4H2O80nilnil12Spherical[54]
Murraya koenigii
(Curry tree)		LeavesPhenols and flavonoidsCu(OAc)2·4H2O80nilnil12Spherical[54]
Nilgirianthus ciliates
(Sahachara)		LeavesPhenol, sapanonin, and tanninsCuSO4·5H2O100nil30 min20Spherical[77]
Olea europaea
(Olive)		LeavesFlavonoidsCuSO4·5H2O100nil24 h20–50Spherical[78]
Phaseolus vulgaris
(Common bean)		FruitsPhenolic, protease inhibitors, phytic acids, and saponinsCuSO4·5H2O120nil7–8 h26.6Spherical[79]
Phoenix dactylifera L.
(Date palm)		LeavesPolyphenols, flavonoids, and tanninsCuSO4·5H2O70nil2 h20–28Spherical[80]
Pterolobium hexapetalum
(Indian redwing)		LeavesPhenols, flavonoid, terpenoids, tannins, alkaloids, carbohydrates, and glycosidesCuSO4·5H2O60nil2 h10–50Spherical[81]
Saccharum officinarum
(Sugarcane)		StemGlucose, sucrose, and fructoseCu(NO3)280109 h29.5–60.5Spherical, square, cube, plate, rectangular[82]
Stachys lavandulifolia (Tea)LeavesBiomoleculesCuCl25010nil<80Spherical[83]
Syzygium alternifolium
(Mogi)		FruitPhenol and primary amines of proteinCuSO4·5H2O508.2– 92 h2–69Spherical[84]
Tamarindus indica
(Tamarinda; Asam jawa)		LeavesPhenols and
flavonoids		Cu(OAc)2·4H2O80nilnil12Spherical[54]
Terminalia bellirica
(Bahera)		FruitsTanninsCu(NO3)225nilnil9–14Spherical[85]
Tribulus terrestris
(Bindii)		FruitAlkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, ascorbic acid, and phenolsCuSO4·5H2O90nil2 h5–22Spherical[86]
Tridax procumbens
(Tridax daisy)		LeavesHexadecen, pentadecne, and squaleneCuSO480nil4 h16Spherical[87]
Table
Table 2. Antibacterial effects of plant-biosynthesized Cu and CuO NPs.
Table 2. Antibacterial effects of plant-biosynthesized Cu and CuO NPs.
Bacterial SpeciesCu/CuO NPsDiameter of Inhibition Zone (mm)/Inhibition (%)Reference
Size (nm)ShapesConcentration/
Amount
Gram-negative
Campylobacter coli48–76Globular25 μg/mL20
(orange peel extract)		[63]
16
(lemon peel extract)
50 μg/mL26
(orange peel extract)
25
(lemon peel extract)
Escherichia coli5–20Spherical100 μg/mL18[47]
5–22SphericalMIC: 16 μg/mL–[86]
10–30Spherical4 mg/mL12.4 ± 1.3[71]
10–50Spherical50 μg/mL14 ± 0.22[81]
16.8Spherical3 mg6 ± 0.09[46]
5 mg7 ± 0.08
18.9–45.2Spherical5 μg/mL98%[75]
20Spherical1000 μg/mL13[77]
20–40Spherical and oval-shaped50 μg/mL3.90 ± 0.27[51]
100 μg/mL8.80 ± 0.54
150 μg/mL11.65 ± 0.67
29.5–60.5Spherical, square,
cube, plate, and rectangular		100 μg5[82]
30–35Spherical4 mg/mL14.2 ± 0.83[49]
48–76Globular25 μg/mL18
(orange peel extract)		[63]
50 μg/mL24
(orange peel extract)
60–100Spherical25 μL24[55]
50 μL32
67–99Spherical10 μL of 170 mL of 1 mM CuSO4·5H2O aqueous solution + 30 mL of 1% green tea extract24 ± 1.73[60]
Klebsiella16.8Spherical3 mg12 ± 0.04[46]
5 mg14 ± 0.05
Klebsiella pneumonia20–40Spherical and oval-shaped50 μg/mL3.50 ± 0.24[51]
100 μg/mL8.55 ± 0.52
150 μg/mL10.65 ± 0.63
Moraxwlla catarrhalis48–76Globular25 μg/mL18
(orange peel extract)		[63]
50 μg/mL24
(orange peel extract)
Proteus mirabilis10–30Spherical8 mg/mL13.2 ± 1.3[71]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa5–22SphericalMIC: 17.5 μg/mL–[86]
10–30Spherical4 mg/mL13.8 ± 0.4[71]
20Spherical1000 μg/mL17[77]
20–40Spherical and oval-shaped50 μg/mL3.75±0.26[51]
100 μg/mL8.60 ± 0.53
150 μg/mL10.90 ± 0.64
29.5–60.5Spherical, square,
cube, plate, and rectangular		100 μg8[82]
30–35Spherical2 mg/mL13.2 ± 0.44[49]
60–100Spherical25 μL16[55]
50 μL31
Salmonella typhi67–99Spherical10 μL of 170 mL of 1 mM CuSO4·5H2O aqueous solution + 30 mL of 1% green tea extract21 ± 1.00[60]
Salmonella typhimurium10–30Spherical8 mg/mL16.8 ± 1[71]
30–35Spherical4 mg/mL12 ± 0[49]
Vibrio harveyi18.9–45.2Spherical5 μg/mL98%[75]
Vibrio parahaemolyticus18.9–45.2Spherical5 μg/mL98%[75]
Gram-positive
Bacillus cereus5–22SphericalMIC: 21 μg/mL–[86]
Bacillus subtilis10–30Spherical4 mg/mL14.6 ± 0.8[71]
10–50Spherical50 μg/mL15 ± 0.29[81]
16.8Spherical3 mg15 ± 0.07[46]
5 mg15 ± 0.11
18.9–45.2Spherical5 μg/mL50%[75]
20–40Spherical and oval-shaped50 μg/mL3.35 ± 0.23[51]
100 μg/mL8.20 ± 0.50
150 μg/mL10.90 ± 0.62
29.5–60.5Spherical, square,
cube, plate, and rectangular		100 μg9[82]
30–35Spherical2 mg/mL13.2 ± 0.83[49]
Clostridium perfringens48–76Globular25 μg/mL12
(orange peel extract)		[63]
50 μg/mL19
(orange peel extract)
Listeria monocytogenes48–76Globular25 μg/mL9
(lemon peel extract)		[63]
50 μg/mL13
(lemon peel extract)
Micrococcus luteus67–99Spherical10 μL of 170 mL of 1 mM CuSO4·5H2O aqueous solution + 30 mL of 1% green tea extract23.33 ± 2.08[60]
Staphylococcus aureus5–20Spherical80 μg/mL20[47]
5–22SphericalMIC: 19.5 μg/mL–[86]
10–30Spherical4 mg/mL12.6 ± 0.8[71]
10–50Spherical50 μg/mL15 ± 0.47[81]
16.8Spherical3mg6 ± 0.09[46]
5 mg10 ± 0.11
18.9–45.2Spherical5 μg/mL> 90%[75]
20Spherical1000 μg/mL15[77]
20–40Spherical and oval-shaped50 μg/mL2.80 ± 0.19[51]
100 μg/mL7.50 ± 0.45
150 μg/mL11.30 ± 0.58
29.5–60.5Spherical, square,
cube, plate, and rectangular		100 μg9[82]
30–35Spherical2 mg/mL15.4 ± 1.34[49]
48–76Globular25 μg/mL13
(orange peel extract)		[63]
17
(lemon peel extract)
50 μg/mL25
(orange peel extract)
23
(lemon peel extract)
60–100Spherical25 μL14[55]
50 μL24
Staphylococcus saprophyticus10–30Spherical2 mg/mL12.4 ± 0.5[71]
Streptococcus mutans20Spherical1000 μg/mL13[77]
67–99Spherical10 μL of 170 mL of 1 mM CuSO4·5H2O aqueous solution + 30 mL of 1% green tea extract30 ± 2.00[60]
Streptococcus pneumonia10–30Spherical4 mg/mL11.8 ± 1[71]
30–35Spherical2 mg/mL15.2 ± 0.83[49]
48–76Globular258
(tangerine peel extract)		[63]
5014
(tangerine peel extract)
Streptococcus pyrogenes20–40Spherical and oval-shaped50 μg/mL3.05 ± 0.21[51]
100 μg/mL8.15 ± 0.50
150 μg/mL10.65 ± 0.60
MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration.
Table
Table 3. Antifungal effects of plant-biosynthesized Cu and CuO NPs.
Table 3. Antifungal effects of plant-biosynthesized Cu and CuO NPs.
Fungal SpeciesCuO NPsDiameter of Inhibition Zone (mm)/INHIBITION (%)Reference
Size (nm)ShapesConcentration
Aspergillus flavus5–24Cuboidal, spherical, oval-shaped10 μg/mL9.0 ± 0.13[66]
25 μg/mL13.16 ± 0.49
50 μg/mL16.9 ± 0.42
20–40Spherical, oval-shaped50 μg/mL2.35 ± 0.16[51]
100 μg/mL6.25 ± 0.36
150 μg/mL9.30 ± 0.58
Aspergillus fumigates20–40Spherical, oval-shaped50 μg/mL2.70 ± 0.18[51]
100 μg/mL7.00 ± 0.42
150 μg/mL9.95 ± 0.65
Aspergillus niger20–40Spherical, oval-shaped50 μg/mL2.70 ± 0.18[51]
100 μg/mL6.60 ± 0.39
150 μg/mL9.96 ± 0.61
Candida albicans10–30Spherical4 mg/mL12 ± 1.2[71]
20–40Spherical, oval-shaped50 μg/mL2.95 ± 0.20[51]
100 μg/mL6.85 ± 0.40
150 μg/mL10.05 ± 0.63
30–35Spherical4 mg/mL9.0 ± 1.22[49]
60–100Spherical25 μL18[55]
50 μL21[55]
Candida glabrata10–30Spherical4 mg/mL13 ± 1[71]
30–35Spherical4 mg/mL10.2 ± 0.83[49]
Candida guilliermondii10–30Spherical2 mg/mL13.8 ± 1[71]
30–35Spherical2 mg/mL8.6 ± 0.89[49]
Candida krusei10–30Spherical2 mg/mL12.4 ± 0.5[71]
30–35Spherical2 mg/mL10.2 ± 0.83[49]
Candida parapsilosis10–30Spherical2 mg/mL14.8 ± 1[71]
Rhizoctonia solani18.9–45.2Spherical50 μg/mL24.4%[75]
100 μg/mL56.6%
200 μg/mL65.5%
Sclerotium oryzae18.9–45.2Spherical50 μg/mL61.1%[75]
100 μg/mL88.9%
200 μg/mL100%
Table
Table 4. Anticancer effects of the plant-derived Cu and CuO NPs biosynthesized.
Table 4. Anticancer effects of the plant-derived Cu and CuO NPs biosynthesized.
Types of Cells/
Cell Line		Cu/CuO NPsToxicity (IC50) (μg/mL)Biological Function (Targeting)Reference
Size (nm)Shapes
Breast cancer
AMJ-1320–50Spherical1.47Antioxidant, loss of membrane potential, and DNA fragmentation[78]
MCF-75–24Cuboidal, spherical, and oval-shaped>100ROS generation, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest[66]
10–40Spherical50.3Growth inhibition[37]
12Spherical19.77–27.44
(depends on source of plant extract)		Antioxidant and apoptosis[54]
18.9–45.2Spherical53.89Growth inhibition[75]
20Spherical85.58Growth inhibition[77]
20Spherical24.5ROS generation and antiangiogenic[111]
30–40Spherical, cubical35Growth inhibition[52]
36 ± 8Spherical21.56ROS and NO generation, apoptosis, DNA fragmentation, induces proinflammatory (TNF-α) cytokines, and inhibits anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10)[53]
>200Spherical21.5ROS generation and antiangiogenic[111]
MDA-MB-23110–50Spherical30ROS generation[81]
20Spherical11ROS generation and antiangiogenic[111]
>200Spherical7.5ROS generation and antiangiogenic[111]
Cervical cancer
HeLa12Spherical26.73–20.32
(depends on the source of plant extract)		Antioxidant and apoptosis[54]
~26.6Spherical~0.5 mg/mLROS generation, loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and apoptosis[79]
36 ± 8Spherical24.74ROS and NO generation, apoptosis, DNA fragmentation, induces proinflammatory (TNF-α) cytokines, and inhibits anti-inflammatory cytokine (IL-10)[53]
60–100Spherical119.1 μg/mLGrowth inhibition[55]
Colon cancer
HT-2910–40Spherical33.0Growth inhibition[37]
Epithelioma
Hep-212Spherical21.66–29.58 (depends on source of plant extract)Antioxidant and apoptosis[54]
Gastric cancer
AGS5–22Spherical25–50Apoptosis[86]
Leukemia
MOLT-410–40Spherical>80Growth inhibition[37]
Liver cancer
HepG223–57Spherical, hexagonal, cubical>500Antioxidant[65]
Lung cancer
A54912Spherical18.11–37.19 (depends on the source of plant extract)Antioxidant and apoptosis[54]
20Spherical81.57Growth inhibition[77]
33.47Spherical, irregular25Apoptosis[56]
577Spherical200Loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, ROS generation, and apoptosis[69]
577Spherical200Regulates histone deacetylases, downregulates oncogenes and upregulates tumor suppressor genes, intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, and downregulates inflammatory genes (TNF-α and COX-2)[70]
Ovarian cancer
SKOV-320–50Spherical2.27Antioxidant, loss of membrane potential, and DNA fragmentation[78]
ROS, reactive oxygen species; NO, nitric oxide; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor; IL-10, interleukin-10.
Table
Table 5. Effects of the plant-derived Cu and CuO NPs biosynthesized on cell lines and animal models.
Table 5. Effects of the plant-derived Cu and CuO NPs biosynthesized on cell lines and animal models.
Types of Cells/
Cell Line/Animal		Cu/CuO NPsToxicity (IC50)Reference
Size (nm)Shapes
Human embryonic kidney cells
HEK 29332 ± 0.9Spherical410 μg/mL[58]
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells
HUVEC10–30Spherical>1000 μg/mL[71]
Human dermal fibroblast
NHDF12Spherical>100 μg/mL[54]
HuFb20–50Spherical54.34 μg/mL[78]
L92920Spherical>100 μg/mL[77]
Animal
Male Swiss albino mice (BALB/c strain)20–50SphericalLethal at 800 mg/kg[78]
Zebrafish20–40Spherical500 ± 15 mg/L[74]
Table
Table 6. Comparison of the toxicity of plant-derived and commercialized CuO NPs.
Table 6. Comparison of the toxicity of plant-derived and commercialized CuO NPs.
Cell Line/
Animal Model		Plant-Mediated Cu/CuO NPsCommercial Cu/CuO NPsReference
Size (nm)ShapesToxicity/
Area		Size (nm)ShapesToxicity/
Area
In vitro
MCF-712Spherical19.77 ± 0.98 μg/mL12Spherical27.44 ± 2.14 μg/mL[54]
HeLa12Spherical20.32 ± 1.16 μg/mL12Spherical45.31 ± 2.44 μg/mL[54]
A54912Spherical18.11 ± 0.93 μg/mL12Spherical37.19 ± 2.82 μg/mL[54]
In vivo
Zebrafish 25–35Spherical175 ± 10 mg/L25–35Spherical45 ± 10 mg/L[57]
Rat10–30SphericalWound area: 0.9 ± 0.2 cm210–30SphericalWound area: 2.1 ± 0.1 cm2[71]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Letchumanan, D.; Sok, S.P.M.; Ibrahim, S.; Nagoor, N.H.; Arshad, N.M. Plant-Based Biosynthesis of Copper/Copper Oxide Nanoparticles: An Update on Their Applications in Biomedicine, Mechanisms, and Toxicity. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11040564

AMA Style

Letchumanan D, Sok SPM, Ibrahim S, Nagoor NH, Arshad NM. Plant-Based Biosynthesis of Copper/Copper Oxide Nanoparticles: An Update on Their Applications in Biomedicine, Mechanisms, and Toxicity. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(4):564. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11040564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Letchumanan, Devanthiran, Sophia P. M. Sok, Suriani Ibrahim, Noor Hasima Nagoor, and Norhafiza Mohd Arshad. 2021. "Plant-Based Biosynthesis of Copper/Copper Oxide Nanoparticles: An Update on Their Applications in Biomedicine, Mechanisms, and Toxicity" Biomolecules 11, no. 4: 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11040564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop