Previous Issue
Volume 14, September
 
 

Surg. Tech. Dev., Volume 14, Issue 4 (December 2025) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1587 KB  
Article
Anterior Column Reconstruction of the Thoracolumbar Spine with a Modular Carbon-PEEK Vertebral Body Replacement Device: Single-Center Retrospective Case Series of 28 Patients
by Samuel F. Schaible, Fabian C. Aregger, Christoph E. Albers, Lorin M. Benneker and Moritz C. Deml
Surg. Tech. Dev. 2025, 14(4), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/std14040035 - 10 Oct 2025
Viewed by 96
Abstract
Background: Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) vertebral-body replacements (VBRs) aim to mitigate subsidence, minimize imaging artifacts, and facilitate radiation planning while preserving fusion potential. We assessed the safety and efficacy of a novel modular, titanium-coated CFR-PEEK VBR (Kong®) for anterior column reconstruction (ACR) [...] Read more.
Background: Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) vertebral-body replacements (VBRs) aim to mitigate subsidence, minimize imaging artifacts, and facilitate radiation planning while preserving fusion potential. We assessed the safety and efficacy of a novel modular, titanium-coated CFR-PEEK VBR (Kong®) for anterior column reconstruction (ACR) in the thoracolumbar spine. Primary question: Does the implant safely and effectively achieve and maintain kyphosis correction after ACR for trauma and neoplasms? Methods: A single-center retrospective case series was performed on 28 patients who underwent thoracolumbar ACR with the Kong® VBR for fractures or tumors (2020–2021). The primary outcome was the bi-segmental kyphotic angle (BKA). Secondary outcomes were screw loosening, cage height loss, fusion rate, subsidence, and tilting. Clinical status was recorded with Odom criteria, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and AOSpine PROST. Results: Twenty-eight patients (mean age, 61 yr; 33% female; mean follow-up, 17.7 mts) were studied. Mean postoperative BKA correction was 16.5° (p = 0.006) and remained 14.5° at final follow-up (p = 0.008); loss of correction was 2.0° (p = 0.568). Subsidence, cage height, and sagittal tilt were unchanged. Fusion (Bridwell grade I/II) was observed in 95% on CT. One deep surgical-site infection occurred. At final follow-up, 91% of patients were graded “excellent” or “good” by Odom. KPS improved by 20 points (p = 0.031), and mean AOSpine PROST was 56.9. Conclusions: Single-center early results indicate that the modular titanium-coated CFR-PEEK VBR is a safe, effective adjunct for thoracolumbar ACR in trauma and neoplasm, providing durable kyphosis correction, mechanical stability and high fusion rates and grants for improved follow-up imaging quality. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 559 KB  
Article
From Triportal to Uniportal Video-Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: The Single Surgeon Learning Curve by CUSUM Chart and Perioperative Outcomes
by Giorgia Cerretani, Elisa Nardecchia, Elena Asteggiano, Alberto Colombo, Davide Di Natale, Luca Filipponi and Nicola Rotolo
Surg. Tech. Dev. 2025, 14(4), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/std14040034 - 1 Oct 2025
Viewed by 214
Abstract
Background: Uniportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomy has improved postoperative outcomes in lung cancer patients. Thus, thoracic surgeons are increasingly required to learn this new approach. Methods: We evaluate the path of a single surgeon switching from triportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomy to the uniportal, using [...] Read more.
Background: Uniportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomy has improved postoperative outcomes in lung cancer patients. Thus, thoracic surgeons are increasingly required to learn this new approach. Methods: We evaluate the path of a single surgeon switching from triportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomy to the uniportal, using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, in a single center to assess the learning curve, enrolling 107 uniportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomies consecutively performed. CUSUM analysis detected how many uniportal video-thoracoscopies occur to obtain changes in mean operation time, among all procedures consecutively performed. CUSUM analysis identified the cut-off at the 67th procedure; this value was used to divide all patients into two groups: group A (first 67 patients, early phase) and group B (40 patients, experienced phase). Then, we analyze the perioperative outcomes between the two groups. Results: Gender characteristics of the two groups were statistically similar. Median operative time decreased significantly after the early phase [188 min (IQR: 151–236) vs. 170.5 (IQR: 134–202) (p-value = 0.02)], respectively. Similarly, during the second phase, the conversions rate decreased: [10 (15%) (group A) vs. 1 (2%) (group B) (p-value = 0.04)], as did the postoperative complications [28 cases (42%) vs. 9 cases (22%) (p-value = 0.04)] and the length of stay [6 days (IQR 5–9.5) vs. 5 days (IQR 4–8) (p-value = 0.04)], giving evidence of skills acquired in the second phase. Conclusions: CUSUM analysis identified 67 uniportal lobectomies, after which operative time, conversion rate, and perioperative complications significantly decreased; the moving average analysis further supports a progressive reduction in operative time. Despite prior multiportal video-thoracoscopic experience, switching to uniportal video-thoracoscopy requires a distinct learning process. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop