Robots and the Work Environment

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2016) | Viewed by 66516

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
2Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University Nova Lisbon, Campus Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
Interests: sociology of technology; human-robot interaction; sociology of work; social implications of automation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
Interests: sociology of work; human-machine-interaction; technology assessment; critical theory
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Industrial, service and social robots are foreseen to become significant “partners” or “co-workers” (Krüger and Surdilovic, 2008; Krüger, Schreck and Surdilovic, 2011; Kim and Mutlu, 2014) [1–3] in human working environments. The increasing expectation of implementing robots in manifold working processes is expressed not only by public debates but also by the orientation of national and international policy strategies (Ebel, 1987; Hägele, Schaaf and Helms, 2002; Krüger, Lien and Verl, 2009) [4–6]. We invite theoretical and empirical papers and case studies that critically engage with the areas of human-robot interaction in work environments and the impact of robots on the work environment. Within the area of human-robot interaction in work environments (whether human worker-robot worker or human client-robot worker, or human worker-robot client), potential areas of engagement can concern, as examples, how industrial, service, and social robots are represented by engineering sciences and social sciences; the idea of a sustainable concept of “work”; how the application of robots is changing the character of work in specific fields; new developments and impacts of automation; the impacts on complex working systems; the anthropocentric dimension of human-machine interfaces; and long-term perspectives of organizational, social, and ethical implications.

Prof. Dr. António B. Moniz
Dr. Bettina-Johanna Krings
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

References:

1.   Krüger, J.; Surdilovic, D. Robust control of force-coupled human-robot-interaction in assembly processes. CIRP Annals—Manuf. Technol. 2008, 57, 41–44.
2.   Krüger, J.; Schreck, G.; Surdilovic, D. Dual arm robot for flexible and cooperative assembly. CIRP Annals—Manuf. Technol. 2011, 60, 5–8.
3.   Kim, Y.; Mutlu, B. How social distance shapes human–robot interaction. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2014, 72, 783–795.
4.   Ebel, K.-H. The impact of industrial robots on the world of work. Robotics 1987, 3, 65–72.
5.   Hägele, M.; Schaaf, W.; Helms, E. Robot assistants at manual workplaces: Effective co-operation and safety aspects. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Robotics (ISR 2002), Stockholm, Sweden, 7–11 October 2002; pp. 1–6.
6.   Krüger, J.; Lien, T.; Verl, A. Cooperation of human and machines in assembly lines. CIRP Annals—Manuf. Technol. 2009, 2, 628–646.

Keywords

  • robotics
  • automation
  • human-robot interaction
  • work organisation
  • technology assessment
  • social theories

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

151 KiB  
Editorial
Special Issue on Robots and the Work Environment
by António B. Moniz and Bettina-Johanna Krings
Societies 2016, 6(4), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6040031 - 28 Oct 2016
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 5518
Abstract
The future development of industries is currently on the agenda of public and scientific debates.[...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robots and the Work Environment)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

203 KiB  
Article
Sociological and Biological Insights on How to Prevent the Reduction in Cognitive Activity that Stems from Robots Assuming Workloads in Human–Robot Cooperation
by Diego Compagna, Alexandra Weidemann, Manuela Marquardt and Philipp Graf
Societies 2016, 6(4), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6040029 - 29 Sep 2016
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5000
Abstract
The reduction of cognitive tasks brought about by new developments in service-robots’ collaboration with humans in working environments has given rise to new challenges as to how to address safety issues. This paper presents insights from biology, cognitive/neural sciences and sociology that can [...] Read more.
The reduction of cognitive tasks brought about by new developments in service-robots’ collaboration with humans in working environments has given rise to new challenges as to how to address safety issues. This paper presents insights from biology, cognitive/neural sciences and sociology that can conquer these new challenges. The main focus lies in sociological variables that ensure safe human–robot interaction in working environments rather than addressing biological ones (avoiding bodily harm) or purely cognitive ones (avoiding any signals that are outside the human’s sensory comfort zones). We will present an approach on how to integrate behavioral patterns into the robotic system in order to prevent the problem of reduced cognition in relation to essential features, which are necessary for carrying out this pattern in the context of a human–robot interaction with non-humanoid robots (which is the most typical design of robots used in work environments). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robots and the Work Environment)
672 KiB  
Article
Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry
by António B. Moniz and Bettina-Johanna Krings
Societies 2016, 6(3), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6030023 - 2 Aug 2016
Cited by 85 | Viewed by 16532
Abstract
The focus of the following article is on the use of new robotic systems in the manufacturing industry with respect to the social dimension. Since “intuitive” human–machine interaction (HMI) in robotic systems becomes a significant objective of technical progress, new models of work [...] Read more.
The focus of the following article is on the use of new robotic systems in the manufacturing industry with respect to the social dimension. Since “intuitive” human–machine interaction (HMI) in robotic systems becomes a significant objective of technical progress, new models of work organization are needed. This hypothesis will be investigated through the following two aims: The first aim is to identify relevant research questions related to the potential use of robotic systems in different systems of work organization at the manufacturing shop-floor level. The second aim is to discuss the conceptualization of (old) organizational problems of human–robot interaction (HRI). In this context, the article reflects on the limits of cognitive and perceptual workload for robot operators in complex working systems. This will be particularly relevant whenever more robots with different “roles” are to be increasingly used in the manufacturing industry. The integration of such complex socio-technical systems needs further empirical and conceptual research with regard to “social” aspects of the technical dimension. Future research should, therefore, also integrate economic and societal issues to understand the full dimensions of new human–robot interaction in industry today. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robots and the Work Environment)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

2696 KiB  
Article
First Application of Robot Teaching in an Existing Industry 4.0 Environment: Does It Really Work?
by Astrid Weiss, Andreas Huber, Jürgen Minichberger and Markus Ikeda
Societies 2016, 6(3), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6030020 - 20 Jul 2016
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 9373
Abstract
This article reports three case studies on the usability and acceptance of an industrial robotic prototype in the context of human-robot cooperation. The three case studies were conducted in the framework of a two-year project named AssistMe, which aims at developing different means [...] Read more.
This article reports three case studies on the usability and acceptance of an industrial robotic prototype in the context of human-robot cooperation. The three case studies were conducted in the framework of a two-year project named AssistMe, which aims at developing different means of interaction for programming and using collaborative robots in a user-centered manner. Together with two industrial partners and a technological partner, two different application scenarios were implemented and studied with an off-the-shelf robotic system. The operators worked with the robotic prototype in laboratory conditions (two days), in a factory context (one day) and in an automotive assembly line (three weeks). In the article, the project and procedures are described in detail, including the quantitative and qualitative methodology. Our results show that close human-robot cooperation in the industrial context needs adaptive pacing mechanisms in order to avoid a change of working routines for the operators and that an off-the-shelf robotic system is still limited in terms of usability and acceptance. The touch panel, which is needed for controlling the robot, had a negative impact on the overall user experience. It creates a further intermediate layer between the user, the robot and the work piece and potentially leads to a decrease in productivity. Finally, the fear of the worker of being replaced by an improved robotic system was regularly expressed and adds an additional anthropocentric dimension to the discussion of human-robot cooperation, smart factories and the upcoming Industry 4.0. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robots and the Work Environment)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

267 KiB  
Article
Robots, Industry 4.0 and Humans, or Why Assembly Work Is More than Routine Work
by Sabine Pfeiffer
Societies 2016, 6(2), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020016 - 3 May 2016
Cited by 154 | Viewed by 20819
Abstract
This article condenses the key findings of qualitative studies on assembly work. Grounded conceptually in considerations of the role of experiential knowledge and living labor capacity with regard to informal expertise and tacit knowledge, the empirical results challenge the dominant view of assembly [...] Read more.
This article condenses the key findings of qualitative studies on assembly work. Grounded conceptually in considerations of the role of experiential knowledge and living labor capacity with regard to informal expertise and tacit knowledge, the empirical results challenge the dominant view of assembly work as routine tasks that could easily be replaced by robotics. The empirical basis comprised of 62 qualitative interviews in five assembly plants provides answers to two questions: Are there non-routine aspects to be found in assembly work today? What exactly is the nature of experience in assembly work? The detailed research results are presented in three steps: the first focuses on the role of the non-routine in core assembly tasks; the second discusses the important and increasing role played by interactive capabilities in assembly work to ensure high performance, quality, and a smooth material flow; and the third highlights the usually neglected role of assembly workers in processes of innovation and organizational learning. The concluding chapter discusses the findings from the perspective of new technological options in robotics, possible worker resistance and effects on employment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robots and the Work Environment)
240 KiB  
Article
Employment, Disabled People and Robots: What Is the Narrative in the Academic Literature and Canadian Newspapers?
by Gregor Wolbring
Societies 2016, 6(2), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020015 - 28 Apr 2016
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 8023
Abstract
The impact of robots on employment is discussed extensively, for example, within the academic literature and the public domain. Disabled people are known to have problems obtaining employment. The purpose of this study was to analyze how robots were engaged with in relation [...] Read more.
The impact of robots on employment is discussed extensively, for example, within the academic literature and the public domain. Disabled people are known to have problems obtaining employment. The purpose of this study was to analyze how robots were engaged with in relation to the employment situation of disabled people within the academic literature present in the academic databases EBSCO All—an umbrella database that consists of over 70 other databases, Scopus, Science Direct and Web of Science and within n = 300 Canadian newspapers present in the Canadian Newsstand Complete ProQuest database. The study focuses in particular on whether the literature covered engaged with the themes of robots impacting (a) disabled people obtaining employment; (b) disabled people losing employment; (c) robots helping so called abled bodied people in their job to help disabled people; or (d) robots as coworkers of disabled people. The study found that robots were rarely mentioned in relation to the employment situation of disabled people. If they were mentioned the focus was on robots enhancing the employability of disabled people or helping so called abled-bodied people working with disabled clients. Not one article could be found that thematized the potential negative impact of robots on the employability situation of disabled people or the relationship of disabled people and robots as co-workers. The finding of the study is problematic given the already negative employability situation disabled people face. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robots and the Work Environment)
Back to TopTop