Next Article in Journal
Teenage Pregnancy and Mental Health
Next Article in Special Issue
Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Special Education Teacher Leadership in Jordan: Current State and Constraints
Previous Article in Special Issue
Robots, Industry 4.0 and Humans, or Why Assembly Work Is More than Routine Work
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Societies 2016, 6(3), 20;

First Application of Robot Teaching in an Existing Industry 4.0 Environment: Does It Really Work?

Automation and Control Institute, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
PROFACTOR GmbH, 4407 Steyr, Austria
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: António B. Moniz and Bettina-Johanna Krings
Received: 29 February 2016 / Revised: 4 July 2016 / Accepted: 11 July 2016 / Published: 20 July 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Robots and the Work Environment)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2696 KB, uploaded 21 July 2016]   |  


This article reports three case studies on the usability and acceptance of an industrial robotic prototype in the context of human-robot cooperation. The three case studies were conducted in the framework of a two-year project named AssistMe, which aims at developing different means of interaction for programming and using collaborative robots in a user-centered manner. Together with two industrial partners and a technological partner, two different application scenarios were implemented and studied with an off-the-shelf robotic system. The operators worked with the robotic prototype in laboratory conditions (two days), in a factory context (one day) and in an automotive assembly line (three weeks). In the article, the project and procedures are described in detail, including the quantitative and qualitative methodology. Our results show that close human-robot cooperation in the industrial context needs adaptive pacing mechanisms in order to avoid a change of working routines for the operators and that an off-the-shelf robotic system is still limited in terms of usability and acceptance. The touch panel, which is needed for controlling the robot, had a negative impact on the overall user experience. It creates a further intermediate layer between the user, the robot and the work piece and potentially leads to a decrease in productivity. Finally, the fear of the worker of being replaced by an improved robotic system was regularly expressed and adds an additional anthropocentric dimension to the discussion of human-robot cooperation, smart factories and the upcoming Industry 4.0. View Full-Text
Keywords: human-robot interaction; Industry 4.0; case study; field test; robot teaching human-robot interaction; Industry 4.0; case study; field test; robot teaching

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Weiss, A.; Huber, A.; Minichberger, J.; Ikeda, M. First Application of Robot Teaching in an Existing Industry 4.0 Environment: Does It Really Work? Societies 2016, 6, 20.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Societies EISSN 2075-4698 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top