Vulnerable Groups Protection and Rights for Advocacy: From the Perspectives of Community-Based Policy Making and Initiatives

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2024) | Viewed by 1722

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Theories and Analysis of Communication, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Interests: social networks; communication; digital citizenship; public relations; diversity; young people; emerging societal questions
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Advocacy is a mechanism to secure the rights and represent the interests of, as well as obtain the appropriate services needed for, vulnerable groups, so as to ensure dignity and promote inclusion, equality, and social justice (Action for Advocacy, 2002: 2). All models of advocacy share a theoretical commitment to social justice and a methodological activism that has been explained as ‘an idea that mobilises people to act in order to bring about change’ (Newman and Yeates, 2008: 2). At a community level, advocacy has been a valuable tool used by various stakeholders—from individual community members to community-based organisations—to address issues experienced by vulnerable groups within the communities they serve, as well as the diverse, multi-layered, and ever changing social, political, economic, and cultural context this work takes place in. This Special Issue aims to explore this dynamic and illuminate the protection of vulnerable groups and their rights for advocacy, from the perspectives of community-based policy making and initiatives. We are interested in the ways that community initiatives and grassroots PAR approaches have been employed to provide rights-based support for vulnerable groups in various contexts, and how these may be used to inform further social policy change based on vulnerable groups' protection and rights.

Suggested topics include:

  • Conceptualising advocacy/theories of advocacy;
  • Advocacy and the decision-making processes;
  • Working with communities to identify and offer rights-based support;
  • Co-producing knowledge of advocacy needs with vulnerable communities;
  • Creative methods and rights-based advocacy;
  • Grassroots Participatory Action Advocacy Research with vulnerable groups;
  • The needs and experiences of different models of advocacy within community contexts;
  • Advocacy and community organising;
  • Translating advocacy knowledge transfer translation outcomes to policy;
  • Community-based advocacy;
  • Statutory-based advocacy.

In this Special Issue, contributions must take the form of either papers, articles, conceptual papers or reviews, and address the topic herein stated.

Prof. Dr. Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • community/community initiatives
  • self-organizing
  • advocacy
  • participatory action research
  • un/hidden voices
  • vulnerability
  • marginalization/exclusion
  • rights-based action
  • transformation
  • agency
  • dignity

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 4164 KiB  
Article
Assessing Compliance with Indigenous Self-Determination Standards: A Comparative Analysis of Chile, Colombia, and Mexico
by Martha Angélica Ramírez Salazar, Omar Alejandro Guirette Barbosa, Selene Castañeda-Burciaga, Leticia I. García Estrada, Juvenal Villanueva-Maldonado and José M. Celaya-Padilla
Societies 2024, 14(11), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14110218 - 25 Oct 2024
Viewed by 658
Abstract
Recent advancements have been observed in the global legal framework, particularly in the recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights, among which the right to self-determination stands out. This right encompasses the ability to define their political status and to pursue economic, social, and cultural [...] Read more.
Recent advancements have been observed in the global legal framework, particularly in the recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights, among which the right to self-determination stands out. This right encompasses the ability to define their political status and to pursue economic, social, and cultural development autonomously. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) has identified six criteria to evaluate adherence to these rights. This study aims to assess the progress made by Chile, Colombia, and Mexico in meeting these criteria. Employing a non-experimental, cross-sectional, and exploratory research design, the study utilized a questionnaire based on a Likert scale to gather data from residents of Indigenous communities within the three countries under consideration to measure the perception that these individuals have regarding the compliance with the six standards of the IACHR, and specific questions have been designed based on the content of each standard. Once the degree of self-determination is understood, a multivariate analysis technique (Principal Component Analysis) will be used to compare the level of progress by country. The data collection instruments were applied in 2023 (September/November), with the results processed and the final report drafted in early 2024. Findings suggest that the criterion most adequately met is that of cultural identity and non-discrimination, whereas the criterion pertaining to the right to prior, free, and informed consultation and consent is the least fulfilled. Through principal component analysis, it was noted that Colombia exhibits a higher level of compliance with the right to self-determination, followed by Mexico, with Chile demonstrating a divergence and lagging in progress. The study concludes that a significant challenge for these countries lies in continuing efforts to effectively meet these standards and ensure the right to self-determination for Indigenous and tribal peoples. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop