Employment Relations in the Era of Industry 4.0

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 May 2025 | Viewed by 4468

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, Democritus University of Thrace, 69100 Komotini, Greece
Interests: personnel economics; employee relations; vocational training; negotiations; labour market; human resource management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Economics, Goce Delchev University of Štip, 2000 Shtip, North Macedonia
Interests: human research management

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The main recent postmodern developments that have been driven by the post COVID era, the 4th Industrial Revolution, and new globalization affect the world of work (Koutroukis et al. 2022; Pfeiffer, 2016). The current study of employment relations seeks to humanize, stabilize, professionalize, democratize, and balance the market economy through old and new institutions. In essence, employment relations seek to make market economies work better (Bosch and Schmitz–Kiessler, 2020). The rise of the digital workplace, involving algorithmic management, machine learning, and artificial intelligence, requires an assessment of its impact on workers and labor-management relations (Kataria et al, 2020; Lloyd and Payne, 2019). In a working environment with robots and AI, the critical dimension has been organizational adaptation by socioeconomic actors, and specifically enterprises and unions (Stroud and Weinel, 2020; Haapanela et, al, 2023). In this context, three significant issues should be studied (Koutroukis et al, 2022). First, vocational education and training are essential in responding to the needs and anticipations of working environments. Thus, organizational change should be linked with corporate (management and labor) learning and collective capacity, building within organizations (Bikse et al, 2022; Pfeiffer, 2018). Second, there is a growing trend towards the psychologization of employment relations. Additionally, the abandonment of unions’ traditional self-image and the adoption of a rather individualism-driven approach compared to a collectivism-driven one have been important shifts towards novel workplaces (Godard, 2014). Third, several differences in the perception of representation by employees have arisen. Thus, the enhancement of labor–management partnership relations through schemes that foster employee voices could improve employee relations for mutual benefit to organizations and everyday life. Moreover, they could create a collaborative culture by promoting institutional change and organizational adaptation (Edwards and Ramirez, 2016; Casey and Delaney, 2022).

References

Bikse, V., Grinevica, L., Rivza, B. and Rivza, P., (2022), Consequences and Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Impact on the Development of Employability Skills, Sustainability, 14, 6970. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14126970

Bosch, G. and Schmitz–Kiessler, J. (2020), Shaping Industry 4.0–an experimental approach developed by German trade unions, Transfer, 26(2) https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258920918480

Casey, C. and Delaney, H. (2022). The effort of partnership: Capacity development and moral capital in partnership for mutual gains, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 43(1): 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X19883007

Edwards, P. and Ramirez, P. (2016) When workers should embrace or resist new technology? New Technology, Work and Employment 31(2): 99–113.

Godard, Ј. (2014), The psychologisation of employment relations?, Human Resource Management Journal 24(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12030

Haapanala, H., Marx, I. and Parolin, Z. (2023). Robots and unions: The moderating effect of organized labour on technological unemployment, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 44(3), 827-852 https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X221094078

Kataria, A., Kumar, S., Sureka, R. and Gupta, B. (2020), Forty years of Employee Relations – The International Journal: a bibliometric overview, Employee Relations, 42(6), 1205-1230. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-10-2019-0410

Koutroukis, T., Chatzinikolaou, D., Vlados, C. and Pistikou, V. (2022), The Post-COVID-19 Era, Fourth Industrial Revolution, and New Globalization: Restructured Labor Relations and Organizational Adaptation, Societies, 12, 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060187

Lloyd, C. and Payne, J. (2019) Rethinking country effects: Robotics, AI and work futures in Norway and the UK. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3): 208–225.

Pfeiffer, S, (2016) Robots, Industry 4.0 and humans, or why assembly work is more than routine work, Societies 6(2):1–26.

Pfeiffer, S. (2018) The ‘future of employment’ on the shop floor: Why production jobs are less susceptible to computerization than assumed, International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 5(3): 208–225.

Stroud, D. and Weinel, M. (2020) A safer, faster, leaner workplace? Technical-maintenance worker perspectives on digital drone technology ‘effects’ in the European steel industry. New Technology, Work and Employment 35(3): 297–313.

Prof. Dr. Theodore Koutroukis
Prof. Dr. Elenica Sofianova
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • employment relations
  • industry 4.0.
  • digital workplace
  • partnership
  • employee voice
  • individualism
  • COVID-19
  • human resource management
  • trade unions

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 519 KiB  
Article
Representativeness in Employment Relations and in Sociological Theories
by Peter Kerckhofs and Jef C. Verhoeven
Societies 2025, 15(4), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15040085 - 27 Mar 2025
Viewed by 588
Abstract
In the democratic structure of the EU (European Union) the representation of employers and employees is seen as an important element for the development of the economy. It is not sufficient to have a representation of these groups, but the representation of these [...] Read more.
In the democratic structure of the EU (European Union) the representation of employers and employees is seen as an important element for the development of the economy. It is not sufficient to have a representation of these groups, but the representation of these groups is also expected to be representative. Representativeness is often seen as an equal proportional distribution of the representatives of different groups that have to be represented. Nevertheless, representativeness can also be differently approached. In this article, we examine whether sociological paradigms can help us to get a more nuanced picture of representativeness in employment relations. For this purpose, we present in paradigms developed by Max Weber, Emile Durkheim, Robert K. Merton, Talcott Parsons, and Jürgen Habermas and the exchange theory and symbolic interactionism. Subsequently, we apply these principles on some employment relations in the EU. And we finish with a discussion and conclusion, in which we support the use of a richer concept of representativeness as it is shown in some sociological paradigms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employment Relations in the Era of Industry 4.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 455 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Dimensions of Employability: A Qualitative Approach
by Hamza Nouib, Hayat Qadech, Manal Benatiya Andaloussi and Aniss Moumen
Societies 2025, 15(3), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15030051 - 20 Feb 2025
Viewed by 806
Abstract
Employability has been widely studied from various theoretical and methodological perspectives. However, certain dimensions of the determinants of employability remain underexplored, particularly in the context of a rapidly evolving labor market shaped by digital transformation and artificial intelligence and socio-economic contextual factors. The [...] Read more.
Employability has been widely studied from various theoretical and methodological perspectives. However, certain dimensions of the determinants of employability remain underexplored, particularly in the context of a rapidly evolving labor market shaped by digital transformation and artificial intelligence and socio-economic contextual factors. The aim of this study is to analyze the dimensions influencing the employability of young Moroccans through an exploratory qualitative approach, based on structured roundtable discussions organized at the Careers and Skills Centre of Laâyoune. The findings identify eight key pillars of employability, aligned with the current labor market demands, encompassing educational and training opportunities, hard and soft skills, geographical mobility, entrepreneurial and project management skills, adaptation to emerging professions, regional economic infrastructure, and state support. These insights provide a comprehensive framework for understanding employability dynamics, offering actionable recommendations for educators, policymakers, and employers. This research stands out by integrating a contextualized approach to employability, bridging global labor market trends with region-specific socio-economic realities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Employment Relations in the Era of Industry 4.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop