Karl Barth's Theology in a Time of Crisis

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Theologies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 September 2021) | Viewed by 10935

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Trinity College Theological School, University of Divinity, Parkville 3052, Australia
Interests: the theology of Karl Barth; post-Holocaust theologies; the life and theology of Markus Barth; Jewish–Christian relations; the doctrine of election

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

It is now beyond question that 2020 is likely to be, in the words of the Australian Prime Minister, Scott Morrison, ‘the toughest year of our lives’. What began, in early January, as an apparently isolated outbreak of a new strain of coronavirus in regional China, has become the worst global pandemic since the Spanish Flu of 1918. With more than 15 million cases, and almost 1 million deaths to date, COVID-19 has also decimated the world’s economies. Then, in May 2020, George Floyd’s death at the hands of police officers in Minneapolis sparked a worldwide outpouring of anger at the entrenched systems of racial injustice, and a surge of support for the Black Lives Matter movement. And, in the midst of it all, climate scientists published new and alarming evidence of the acceleration of catastrophic global warming.

In this context, it might well be strange to ask what relevance Karl Barth’s theology still has. What possible value could there be in exploring the theological insights of someone—no matter how influential—whose times were so other than these? Nevertheless, this is precisely what this Special Issue of Religions will do. Noting not only that Karl Barth lived, worked, and thought theologically in a time of global turmoil—the catastrophes of the First and Second World Wars, the Great Depression, the myriad wars for independence from colonial rule through the 1960s, and the establishment of the State of Israel in the aftermath of the Sho’ah—this Special Issue also recognizes that Barth’s theology was, however implicitly and even unwillingly, shaped by such events. Without suggesting that Barthian theology provides any sort of panacea to the world’s current crises, this Special Issue does invite explorations of the ways in which Barth’s thought intersects with, and illumines, the challenges of global modernity.

For this Special Issue, papers are invited that wrestle with these issues. Some topics that papers might explore are:

  • Karl Barth’s doctrine of providence
  • Karl Barth and the problem of evil
  • Karl Barth and the contextuality of theology; or, should we do theology ‘as if nothing has happened’?
  • Karl Barth’s crisis-ecclesiology: what is the task of the Church in times of crisis?
  • Karl Barth on race relations
  • Karl Barth on creation-care

Prof. Dr. Mark R. Lindsay
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • crisis
  • providence
  • evil
  • eschatology
  • creation
  • race
  • ecclesiology
  • contextuality

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 328 KiB  
Article
“As If Nothing Had Happened”: Karl Barth’s ‘Responsible’ Theology
by Michael D. O’Neil
Religions 2022, 13(3), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030266 - 21 Mar 2022
Viewed by 2561
Abstract
Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in early 1933 precipitated an ecclesial and theological crisis in the life of the German churches. Karl Barth responded to the crisis in his treatise Theological Existence Today, calling the German church to steadfast faithfulness in the [...] Read more.
Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in early 1933 precipitated an ecclesial and theological crisis in the life of the German churches. Karl Barth responded to the crisis in his treatise Theological Existence Today, calling the German church to steadfast faithfulness in the face of increasing pressure to compromise the central commitments of its faith. This essay provides an exposition of Barth’s treatise, exploring his understanding of theological existence, and evaluating his rather infamous assertion that he would “carry on theology, and only theology, now as previously, and as if nothing had happened”. It finds that Barth called his peers to ‘responsible’ theology, the practice of which required a particular ethos and specific methodological commitments. Such responsibility was critical if the church was to retain both its integrity as the people of God, and its ministry, during this crisis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Karl Barth's Theology in a Time of Crisis)
10 pages, 219 KiB  
Article
Reading Karl Barth on Truth and Falsehood in the Post-Truth Age
by Geoff Thompson
Religions 2021, 12(8), 593; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080593 - 31 Jul 2021
Viewed by 1790
Abstract
This article offers a close reading of two sections of Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics, i.e., §70.1 “The True Witness” and §70.2 “The Falsehood of Man” against the background of the post-truth environment. A brief discussion of the post-truth phenomenon highlights how some [...] Read more.
This article offers a close reading of two sections of Karl Barth’s Church Dogmatics, i.e., §70.1 “The True Witness” and §70.2 “The Falsehood of Man” against the background of the post-truth environment. A brief discussion of the post-truth phenomenon highlights how some strands of the resistance to it trade on a binary of objective and subjective approaches to truth and epistemology, insisting on the triumph of the former over the latter as the way of overcoming the problems of knowledge and truth in a post-truth culture. The reading of the two selected texts from the Dogmatics indicate that Barth’s discussion of truth and falsehood cuts across that binary. Whilst much of what Barth says in these texts is said in earlier parts of the Dogmatics, it is sharpened in this context by Barth’s discussion of the “pious lie,” the distortion of the truth within the Christian community, as the fundamental form of falsehood. Alertness to this sin challenges the church to adopt a posture of self-criticism to its own knowledge of the truth. This can be its own form of witness in the post-truth age. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Karl Barth's Theology in a Time of Crisis)
11 pages, 262 KiB  
Article
Divine ‘Pastness’ and the Creation of Hope: The Significance of the Sepultus est…
by Mark R. Lindsay
Religions 2021, 12(6), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060439 - 12 Jun 2021
Viewed by 1792
Abstract
This article explores Karl Barth’s exegesis of the ‘sepultus est…’ from the Apostles’ Creed, as articulated in his 1935 Credo lectures. I argue that Barth accords the sepultus a degree of theological significance that is against the grain, not only of [...] Read more.
This article explores Karl Barth’s exegesis of the ‘sepultus est…’ from the Apostles’ Creed, as articulated in his 1935 Credo lectures. I argue that Barth accords the sepultus a degree of theological significance that is against the grain, not only of the majority of western interpretations of Jesus’s burial, but also of his own later interpretation of it within his Kirchliche Dogmatik. Specifically, this article argues that in his 1935 lectures, Barth exegetes the sepultus in terms of a divine self-surrender to the ‘pure pastness’ that is the ‘state and fate’ of all humanity. As a consequence, the sepultus can then be used as the pivot to a different, and more hopeful, future. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Karl Barth's Theology in a Time of Crisis)
13 pages, 611 KiB  
Article
The God of the Covenant: Karl Barth on Creation Care
by Nixon de Vera
Religions 2021, 12(5), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12050326 - 07 May 2021
Viewed by 3418
Abstract
This article seeks to explore the identity of the Creator God in Karl Barth’s doctrine of creation. Attention is given to his understanding of the eternal covenant God has made with humanity and how we are cared for within a covenantal fellowship. The [...] Read more.
This article seeks to explore the identity of the Creator God in Karl Barth’s doctrine of creation. Attention is given to his understanding of the eternal covenant God has made with humanity and how we are cared for within a covenantal fellowship. The study also concerns itself with how Barth’s distaste for the notion of analogia entis is somewhat unsustained in his treatment of creation. I argue that, to some extent, the analogy of being vis-à-vis the cosmos is complementarily employed with analogia fides in Barth’s articulation of creation care. This is the case as he reconfigures the talk on creation rigidly in and through Jesus Christ as Creator and creature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Karl Barth's Theology in a Time of Crisis)
Back to TopTop