Geopolitics and Religion(s): Neglected Topics in the Current World Crisis

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2025) | Viewed by 3989

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of International Studies, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33146, USA
Interests: religion and state; ethnic conflict and civil wars; international relations; post-Soviet studies; and nationalism

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Political Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431-0991, USA
Interests: theory of International Relations; post-Soviet studies and Religion; Civilizations and Culture in World Affairs; non-western approaches to world affairs in addition to pedagogy and the use of IT in education on International Studies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Religions and geopolitics conjoined have moved to the center stage of today's dangerous world. Many narratives describe this process, analyzing the state of the world, including (but not limited to) the current Ukraine–Russia war and its broader ramifications. We have reviewed much of the relevant literature.

In the era of recognizing the need to include all narratives in the spirit of the new "Global IR" ISA section (https://www.isanet.org/ISA/Sections/GIRS), in this Religions Special Issue, we want to explore the range of narratives of geopolitics and religion, as they come from different parts of the world but are often not included in but filtered out of the Western dialogue of today's uncertain world.

We refer just to two examples we might miss:

First, it might be argued that Putin does not speak the language of "Eurocentric" or "West-centric" IR discipline, but in a hybrid narrative of his kind of geopolitics and orthodox religion, on a "holy" mission to save western Christianity from its dramatic decline and decadence and a loss of fundamental Christian values. In this regard, he draws inspiration from his close ally Moscow Orthodox Patriarch Kirill (it could be, of course, argued that a common goal of despots, not merely in post-Cold War politics, is to co-opt the church. While Putin has led the way via a longstanding strategic alliance with the Russian Orthodox Church, a similar dynamic is at work in other emerging powers—including China, India, and Brazil—whose current leaders have all found political and geopolitical utility in religion for their geopolitical goals). Geopolitically speaking, Putin sees Russia as the heart of the geopolitical vision of "Eurasia," among others drawing on the Russian geopolitics scholar Aleksandr Dugin's 1997 “The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia”.

Second, whether it is just a façade, in contrast to the unified Western support for Ukraine and denunciation of Putin's imperialist war, Putin's stance seems to appeal to a growing coalition of BRICS countries, their religions hostile to each other but anti-American and anti-Western, joined surprisingly by Iran and Saudi Arabia, with a long list of future "applicants." Despite their different religions, they seem to share the geopolitical view that the today's international order is skewed by its narrow ahistorical west-centric filter. Instead, they see a post-Western changed world, described by many authors, e.g., Brazilian–German Olivier Stuenkel's 2016 book “Post-Western World: How Emerging Powers are Remaking Global Order”.

We are pleased to invite you to consider the above or other examples of the effort to go beyond the so-far predominant view of religion as merely a "soft power" (Haynes) to "sharp" or "smart", as indicated in the pioneering work of Peter Mandeville, towards a new generation of scholarship on religion and geopolitics, i.e., beyond the geopolitics of religious soft power; towards "Religious Renaissance" (in the work of Russian scholars).

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Interpretations of the theme of this issue by scholars from different parts of the world are particularly welcome. 

Research areas may include (but not limited to) the following:

  • Conceptualizing religion beyond soft power in geopolitics;
  • The role of religion(s) in the historical evolution and contemporary development of geopolitics;
  • Area studies and the scholarly debate on religion(s) and geopolitics;
  • Theoretical milestones and empirical evidence at the nexus between religion(s) and geopolitics;
  • Religion(s) and geopolitics: what is next?

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200-300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editors, Prof. Vendulka Kubalkova (vkubalkova@miami.edu) and Dr. Renat Shaykhutdinov (rshaykhu@fau.edu), or to the Assistant Editor of Religions, Ms. Margaret Liu (margaret.liu@mdpi.com). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purpose of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Vendulka Kubalkova
Dr. Renat Shaykhutdinov
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • beyond religion as soft power only
  • religion(s) and geopolitics
  • against west-and Euro-centrism
  • international political theology and geopolitics
  • the ‘holy’ and ‘mundane’ in world politics
  • competing and complementary narratives in religion and geopolitics
  • strategic narratives in international relations (IR) sharp and smart power in IR, BRICS

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 272 KB  
Article
Religeopolitics and Evangelical Place-Making: An Interpretative Phenomenological Study of Transnational Mission Partnerships
by Tanner Morrison
Religions 2025, 16(11), 1466; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16111466 - 19 Nov 2025
Viewed by 397
Abstract
Evangelical churches increasingly engage in transnational partnerships that shape spiritual identity and moral belonging across borders. This study investigates how such partnerships function not simply as organizational strategies but as lived spatial practices grounded in faith. Drawing on Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) of [...] Read more.
Evangelical churches increasingly engage in transnational partnerships that shape spiritual identity and moral belonging across borders. This study investigates how such partnerships function not simply as organizational strategies but as lived spatial practices grounded in faith. Drawing on Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) of interviews with Canadian and Mexican participants in a long-term church-planting relationship, the article explores how theological commitments, emotional ties, and embodied rituals generate spatial meaning. Participants framed their engagement not through institutional goals, but through metaphors of family, covenant, and companionship, suggesting a grassroots geopolitics rooted in care, hospitality, and spiritual presence. The findings reveal that space is produced not only through ideology or policy, but through practices like shared meals, cross-cultural mentorship, and prayerful presence—acts that reconfigure belonging along theological and affective lines. The article introduces the concept of religeopolitics to describe this phenomenon, arguing that evangelical actors are not merely influenced by global geopolitics but actively create alternative spatial imaginaries through faith. Foregrounding religious subjectivity in spatial production, this article advances scholarship on lived religion and critical geopolitics, highlighting how spiritual communities shape geopolitical belonging through theological imagination, relational duration, and embodied moral practice. Full article
51 pages, 574 KB  
Article
Pax Wahhabica Revisited: Saudi Arabia’s Imperial Theopolitics from Hegemony to Hybridity
by Naveed S. Sheikh
Religions 2025, 16(10), 1286; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16101286 - 10 Oct 2025
Viewed by 2016
Abstract
This paper revisits Saudi Arabia’s religious statecraft through the lens of Pax Wahhabica, interrogating the transnational diffusion, strategic reconfiguration, and evolving instrumentalisation of Wahhabism as a modality of imperial theopolitics and a conduit of ideological projection. Tracing Wahhabism from its eighteenth-century roots, [...] Read more.
This paper revisits Saudi Arabia’s religious statecraft through the lens of Pax Wahhabica, interrogating the transnational diffusion, strategic reconfiguration, and evolving instrumentalisation of Wahhabism as a modality of imperial theopolitics and a conduit of ideological projection. Tracing Wahhabism from its eighteenth-century roots, through its Cold War entrenchment as a bulwark against secular nationalism, to its post-9/11 fragmentation, this study offers a conceptual re-evaluation of Wahhabism not as a fixed theological doctrine but as a malleable constellation of norms and discourses continuously calibrated to state interest. Theoretically anchored in soft power analysis, constructivist norm diffusion, Gramscian hegemony, and Foucauldian governmentality, this paper examines how religious norms are mobilised through affective discourse, institutional socialisation, and securitised governance to advance regime resilience. Through empirical case studies on Bosnia, Indonesia, and Nigeria, it elucidates how Wahhabi norms were localised, hybridised, and, in some instances, weaponised against their progenitors. Finally, this paper examines the domestic reconfiguration and international repositioning of Wahhabism under Muḥammad bin Salmān, arguing that contemporary Saudi theopolitics marks not the abandonment of Wahhabism but its reconversion into a strategically curated, domesticated ideology. Pax Wahhabica, thus, persists—not as an unbroken theological doctrine but as a hybrid ideational empire in which Islam is strategically retooled as an instrument of hegemonic statecraft. Full article
Back to TopTop