Womanist Thought: Freedom, Violence, and Sexual Embodiment

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Theologies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 July 2024) | Viewed by 5542

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Independent Scholar, Raleigh, NC, USA
Interests: womanist and feminist studies; theology; justice; violence and religion

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dean of Sisters Chapel, Spellman College, Atlanta, GA 30314, USA
Interests: philosophy; womanist theology; womanist thought; religion

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
New Testament and Greek, McAfee School of Theology, Mercer University, Macon, GA 31207, USA
Interests: religion and philosophy; womanist theology; womanist thought

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Fathers, husbands, and governments have deemed the right to control the minds, bodies, and freedoms of women in general and those bodies of Africana women in particular for millennia. The control exists as systematic, hegemonic dominance. Married with the philosophy of Tacitus, who posited Anglo-Saxon superiority (Germania, 98 CE), which merges with manifest destiny and exceptionalism, one intention of white supremacist patriarchal capitalistic misogyny (WSPCM) is to imprison the bodies of women of color, removing all freedom to think and control their bodies. Familial, political, and religious beliefs and doctrines have codified and reinscribed such control. Amid systemic oppression, Africana women have always protested such theft in myriad ways before the development of womanist thought and activism, building on the thought of Alice Walker. Womanist scholars at Union Theological Seminary of New York (USA) began to name the intersectional, systemic oppression and call for liberation in the 1980s. Today, the intersections include class, gender, race, sexual orientation, age, and ability. While begun in a Christian context in the United States, womanist scholarship/activism is interdisciplinary, interreligious, and global. The systemic, societal oppression exploding during enslavement that limited all freedom penetrates every facet of black women’s lives daily. Between sexual violence by religious leaders, obfuscations like the Moynihan Report (1965), salacious public imagery (e.g., Welfare Queens—Reagan 1976; Clinton 1992, Mammy, Jezebel), the rescinding of Roe v Wade (2022), attacks on public education, mass incarceration, and the ongoing erasure of social programming to support impoverished families, all spells a fear-mongering attack to control and use Africana women as cheap economic labor by any means necessary. This journal issue explores womanist thought and activism as scholars explore the meaning of black women’s freedom amid the intersectionalities of class, gender, race, sexual orientation, age, and ability as lived out amid white supremacist patriarchal capitalistic misogyny as violence targeting black female sexual bodies. The scope is interdisciplinary scholarship and activism, including rituals, multi-media, black women’s cultural artifacts (e.g., poetry, visual arts, music, and materiality) faith practices, sacred scriptures, and organized protest. The purpose of this volume is to heighten awareness about the conscious and unconscious, intentional and unintentional ways systems infringe upon and cause harm to the totality of black women’s lives and their sexual embodiment. Other issues include vocation, creative outlets, entrepreneurship/adjacent issues, self-defined family, birthing and birthing and reproductive rights, and access to health care as relates to freedom.

Relate to existing literature: Other media that may address these questions would be blogs, social media, online ministry, e.g., “the Unfit Christian”, including publications by the Samuel DeWitt Proctor Conference.

Prof. Dr. Cheryl A. Kirk-Duggan
Dr. Neichelle Guidry
Dr. Angela N. Parker
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • womanist
  • justice
  • power
  • violence
  • sexual violence
  • freedom
  • legacy
  • activism
  • ritual
  • education
  • intersectionality

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 224 KiB  
Article
Ain’t I a Woman? A Look at the Beauty of Blackness Amid the Internalized Body Politic of Genteel Whiteness
by Valerie Miles-Tribble
Religions 2024, 15(10), 1196; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101196 - 30 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1261
Abstract
Ain’t I a Woman? This question was raised by activist and self-emancipated former slavewoman Sojourner Truth, who validly questioned the body politic of identity when contextualized to perceptions of female personhood. Essentially, what Truth challenged were presumptions about the standards set to revere [...] Read more.
Ain’t I a Woman? This question was raised by activist and self-emancipated former slavewoman Sojourner Truth, who validly questioned the body politic of identity when contextualized to perceptions of female personhood. Essentially, what Truth challenged were presumptions about the standards set to revere female bodies through markers of genteel Whiteness, while the worth of embodied Blackness, precisely the beauty of Black women, is reviled. In this article, I seek to raise awareness about factors of patriarchy and societal ramifications. Patriarchy is a systematized phenomenology of norms privileging the male gaze. The White male gaze, particularly in strongholds of power, influences the body politic of communal identity. Black women tend to lean on their faith to embody strength, yet patriarchy also encumbers the gendered body politic in religious spheres. As a womanist scholar, my analysis considers the intricate roles that patriarchy holds in the cultural production of a genteel, pretty woman image, wherein the aura of Whiteness grounds a body politic that deems Blackness as other. Despite the influences of prevailing macrosystems, I propose a theoethic of self-love to push against negatively biased identity boundaries by affirming ways to embrace Black beauty with a subversive imperative to love oneself regardless. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Womanist Thought: Freedom, Violence, and Sexual Embodiment)
18 pages, 293 KiB  
Article
Overcoming the Violence of “Virtuous” Womanhood: Liberating Women from the Proverbs 31 Paradigm
by Lisa Allen-McLaurin
Religions 2023, 14(8), 1028; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081028 - 10 Aug 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3327
Abstract
“Who can find a virtuous woman?” (Prov. 31:10 KJV). My entire life, I have heard and read messages about the “virtuous” woman, as depicted in Proverbs 31:10–31. Though many herald this character as the standard for godly women, I find her portrayal problematic. [...] Read more.
“Who can find a virtuous woman?” (Prov. 31:10 KJV). My entire life, I have heard and read messages about the “virtuous” woman, as depicted in Proverbs 31:10–31. Though many herald this character as the standard for godly women, I find her portrayal problematic. She is depicted as a one-dimensional worker bee, never engaged in rest, recreation, or relationship building. Further, her spiritual location and formation go unmentioned. How did such a limited illustration become the religious paradigm by which women and girls are measured? At its root is white supremacist, patriarchal, capitalistic misogyny (WSPCM), employed in churches to consign women to “safe”, secondary status while still using them as workhorses and sources of income to keep institutions viable. Once internalized, women and girls bear the crushing weight of an unhealthy, unattainable achievement, struggling to become a fictitious, unrealistic figure. In this article, I refute the WSPCM interpretation of the Proverbs 31 woman as the standard for faithful, Spirit-filled women, offering instead a liberative paradigm grounded in womanist hermeneutics, ethics, and spirituality. This approach provides a critique of and corrective for the oppressive, erroneous, and dangerous interpretations of “virtue” and “womanhood” that do violence to female personhood, especially in the name of religion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Womanist Thought: Freedom, Violence, and Sexual Embodiment)
Back to TopTop