Religion and Conflict, Religion and Peace: Demystifying the Role of Religion in Conflict Dynamics

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2026) | Viewed by 1938

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Peace and Conflict Studies, University of North Carolina Greensboro (UNCG), Greensboro, NC 27412, USA
Interests: social movement activism; interdsicpilary/transdisciplinary; religion and conflict; peaebuilding; nonviolent conflict transformation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA
Interests: community mental health; immigrant and refugee populations; conflict resolution; restorative justice; peacebuilding and social justice issues; engaged Buddhism; international social work and social development
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Oversimplifying religion as simply a cultural phenomenon unrelated to political organization or as solely dealing with soteriology can lead to, at best, misguided recommendations for conflict resolution and, at worst, progressively escalating and protracted episodes of injustice and violence in the name of religion. Conversely, by overemphasizing the importance of religion in conflict, other factors like economic disparity or structural violence may get short shrift. This Special Issue takes as a premise that it may only be possible to follow Richard Horsley's (2003) advice, namely that, when striving "for critical studies of religion, we must almost certainly be thinking in terms of ‘religion and...’".[i] In other words, religion, in Horsley's sense, cannot be understood as a stand-alone social phenomenon, and therefore concepts like ‘religious conflict’ are inaccurate and misleading. In this reading of religion as an institutionalized collective belief system, compound ideas like ‘religious conflict’ become meaningless due to the broad connotations and presumptions they arouse.

This Special Issue aims to comparatively explore ‘Western’ and ‘Non-Western’ conceptions of religion and faith-based lifestyles and to explore what  divergent conceptions mean for understanding the role of religion in peace. Of specific interest will be manuscripts that explore both the key factors and best means of overcoming violent religious militancy (or, to put it another way, the best means to countering violent extremism— Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) of the ‘religious’ variety). What role does religion and religious belief and doctrine play in conflict transformation and positive peace? What can be learned from adopting methods of religious studies in analyzing conflict dynamics and peace processes? Aiming to overcome mispreceptions about the role of religion in peacemaking and peacebuilding processes, this Speical Issue will demystify the common conception that ‘religious conflicts’ are a special and incommensurable category of social conflict. Of particular interest to the Guest Editor are manuscripts that address the following broad sub-themes:

  • Religious leaders’ attempts to counter violent extremism;
  • Use of religious langauge and doctrine to justify either violence and/or peace;
  • Attempts to redefine conflicts, like the protracted conflict in Palestine–Israel, as being other than religious;
  • Interfaith encounters and dialogue as unique means of building peace;
  • Persistent beliefs in violence and force as religiously sanctioned and justified forms of conflict-management, resolution, or even transformation.

We expect that this Special Issue will have broad and deep impact on policymakers and peace practitioners working in conflicts that are often chacterized as being primarily of a religious variety.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 200–300 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send the title and abstract as an expression of intersted by 31 January 2026 to the Guest Editor, or to the Assistant Editor of Religions. Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editor for the purposes of ensuring proper fit within the scope of this Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review, with full manucscripts being due by 28 February 2026. We look forward to receiving your contributions.

NOTES:

i Richard Horsley, "Religion and Other Products of Empire," Journal of the American Academy of Religion (71: 1, 2003), 39.

Dr. Jeremy A. Rinker
Guest Editor

Dr. Daniel Rhodes
Co-Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religion and conflict
  • religion and peacemaking
  • interfaith dialogue
  • interreligious contract
  • religious miltants
  • Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)
  • conflict dynamics
  • values conflicts
  • belief/faith
  • peacebuilding

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 277 KB  
Article
Social Justice in Sikhism and Christianity: Then and Now
by Bree Alexander-Richardson and Hermeet Kohli
Religions 2026, 17(5), 514; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17050514 - 23 Apr 2026
Viewed by 333
Abstract
Social workers are charged with challenging social injustice and pursuing social change, particularly during divisive and conflictual times, and just as social work has often been at the forefront of conversation during these times, so too has faith and religion. In this article, [...] Read more.
Social workers are charged with challenging social injustice and pursuing social change, particularly during divisive and conflictual times, and just as social work has often been at the forefront of conversation during these times, so too has faith and religion. In this article, two social work faculty members engage in interfaith dialogue of Christianity and Sikhism to explore social justice, moral responsibility, and community-based approaches to peacebuilding. The article highlights how each faith tradition’s theological commitments (e.g., Christian emphases on agape, liberation, and restorative justice and Sikh principles of seva (selfless service), sarbat da bhala (the welfare of all) and Sant Sipahi (courageous resistance to oppression) shape distinctive yet complementary approaches to justice-oriented action. By examining the convergence and divergence between Christian and Sikh perspectives, the authors contribute to broader conversations on peacebuilding, pluralism, and ethics across diverse faith communities. Through an exploratory framework emphasizing mutual inquiry, the dialogue reveals shared values such as dignity, compassion, and the pursuit of equitable social structures, while also highlighting the unique contributions each faith brings to contemporary social justice movements and social work practice. Finally, the article demonstrates how interfaith engagement can expand practitioners’ understanding of justice by offering alternative moral languages, practices, and modes of activism. Thus, it identifies the potential of interfaith partnerships for addressing systemic inequities and conflict, countering religious polarization, and cultivating sustainable models of peace grounded in solidarity. Full article
16 pages, 269 KB  
Article
Litigating the Sacred: Legal, Memory, and Spatial Dynamics in Worship Conflicts in Contemporary India
by Xuejiao Zhang, Guang Yang and Chao Chen
Religions 2025, 16(12), 1561; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16121561 - 11 Dec 2025
Viewed by 864
Abstract
This study critically examines India’s secularism through an interdisciplinary analytical framework that explores the complex intersections of religious dynamics, legal structures, and political contestations. Sites of worship, functioning as sacred spaces, legal entities, and political symbols, have become focal points for multifaceted power [...] Read more.
This study critically examines India’s secularism through an interdisciplinary analytical framework that explores the complex intersections of religious dynamics, legal structures, and political contestations. Sites of worship, functioning as sacred spaces, legal entities, and political symbols, have become focal points for multifaceted power dynamics. The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 (hereinafter the Places of Worship Act) aimed to resolve historical disputes by institutionalizing a “status quo” as of 15 August 1947. However, the Supreme Court’s judgment in the Ram Janmabhoomi–Babri Masjid dispute is widely seen as marking a shift in adjudicatory emphasis, with archaeological reports and scriptural materials accorded heightened probative weight vis-à-vis the Act’s status quo principle. In its wake, appeals to “historical justice” have helped channel controversies over sacred sites into legal forums, where disputes are increasingly framed through evidentiary and procedural lenses rather than solely as property conflicts. Subsequent litigation has, at times, been mobilized within broader ideological projects that center Hindu identity in national politics, with the potential to reshape sacred space and public memory through legal–administrative pathways and to recalibrate the practice of secular adjudication in India. Full article
Back to TopTop