Reimagining Journalism in the Era of Digital Innovation

A special issue of Journalism and Media (ISSN 2673-5172).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2025) | Viewed by 9165

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Communication and Arts, Nebrija University, 28248 Madrid, Spain
Interests: digital literacy; journalism; social media; innovation; communication; narrative platforms

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Communication and Arts, Nebrija University, 28248 Madrid, Spain
Interests: literacy; brand communication; digital environment; vulnerable audiences

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

At present, journalism is undergoing profound transformation, which is driven by digital innovation, artificial intelligence, and changes in audience habits. From automation in journalistic practice and the personalization of content to new narrative formats and emerging modes of consumption, journalism is being redefined on multiple levels—technological, professional, ethical, and educational.

The convergence of factors such as digital acceleration, the emergence of new narratives, the redefinition of business models, and the change in social expectations of the media is shaping a new media ecosystem in which the foundations of the profession are being rethought (Peña-Fernández et al., 2023). These transformations affect all links in the information value chain in a transversal manner, from sources to audiences, including newsrooms, distribution channels, and financing models.

Innovation in journalism cannot be analyzed solely as a response to technological advances but must be analyzed as a complex process, located at the intersection between culture, economy, education, and citizenship. New formats such as podcasts, immersive journalism, interactive visual projects, and newsgames not only incorporate digital tools but also involve a reconceptualization of storytelling, modes of production, and the relationship between journalists and audiences (Paulussen, 2016; García-Avilés et al., 2022).

Added to this are transformations in labor and training dynamics. Precariousness, professional polyvalence, and the need for multidisciplinary skills pose challenges for training and education systems in communication (Hossain & Wenger, 2024). In addition, the growing disconnect between younger generations and traditional media raises questions as to how journalistic trust, credibility, and relevance are built today (Newman et al., 2024).

In this scenario, the sustainability of journalism requires new perspectives on business models, information entrepreneurship, the role of local and community media, and strategies to strengthen the social function of journalism in contexts of misinformation and polarization. Media literacy and citizen participation emerge as essential axes to renew the symbolic pact between media and society (Wardle & Derakhshan, 2021; Pérez-Escoda et al., 2022).

Artificial intelligence is one of the elements of this most recent transformation. However, its analysis should not be isolated but rather incorporated into a comprehensive approach to the mutations of the ecosystem. From the automation of editorial processes to content generation and news personalization, AI raises ethical, political, and professional questions that can only be addressed from a multidisciplinary and inclusive perspective (Carlson, 2016; Luengo & Herrera-Damas, 2021; Cerezo, 2024).

The proliferation of digital positions linked to specific machine learning functions—transcriptions, text translation, and pattern identification in large volumes of data—has not only failed to displace traditional positions in sectors where interpersonal skills, such as adaptability to change, are valued (Ceide et al, 2023) but has also bolstered traditional skills such as analyses, interpretation, and contextualization of information (Cerezo, 2024). In fact, this proliferation has highlighted the journalist’s unique ability to culturally interpret data automated by machines (Carlson, 2016).

As traditional media attempt to reinvent their business models and younger generations reformulate their ways of relating information, interdisciplinary research becomes essential to understand these evolving dynamics that affect the entire information value chain, which is composed of three essential elements: sources, media, and audiences.

Thus, in this Special Issue, we seek to bring together research from an interdisciplinary perspective that critically analyzes the processes of structural change that are affecting journalistic practice. Priority will be given to approaches that extend beyond technology to understand innovation as a cultural, professional, economic, and educational phenomenon.

Submitted papers should be original, theoretical essays and empirical studies addressing, among others, the following topics:

  1. The incorporation and impact of artificial intelligence in journalism.
  2. Redefining journalism and technological innovations in the digital environment.
  3. New news formats in digital journalism (e.g., immersive, interactive, data journalism, etc.).
  4. New formulas in the processes of creation, production, distribution, and consumption of content.
  5. Teaching innovation in journalism education and the development of new professional profiles.
  6. Disruptive business models and entrepreneurship in journalism.
  7. Mechanisms against the disinformation and promotion of new media literacy formulas.

References

  • Carlson, M. (2016). Automated journalism: A posthuman future for digital news? In The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713793
  • Ceide, C. F., Ruiz, M. J. U., & Álvarez, M. V. (2023). Employer activity in public television in the age of automation: employer branding, recruitment channels, selection processes, skills and professional profiles in demand | Actividad empleadora en la televisión pública de la era de la automatización: emplo. Estudios Sobre El Mensaje Periodistico, 29(4), 855–868. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.88582
  • P. (14 de julio de 2024). La IA Gen y la 'deconstrucción' de la cadena de valor de los medios. Programatically.com https://www.programaticaly.com/colaboradores/ia-gen-deconstruccion-cadena-valor-medios-pepe-cerezo
  • Diakopoulos, N. (2020). Automating the News: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Media. Harvard University Press.
  • Eder, M., & Sjøvaag, H. (2025). Falling behind the adoption curve: Local journalism’s struggle for innovation in the AI transformation. Journal of Media Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2025.2473301
  • García-Avilés, J. A., Ferrer-Conill, R., & García-Ortega, A. (2022). Gamification and Newsgames as Narrative Innovations in Journalism. In Studies in Big Data (Vol. 97). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88028-6_5
  • Gutsche, R. E. (2024). Cultures of Digital Architectures: Power and Positionalities in the Backend of Online Journalism Production. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 48(3), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599221113989
  • Hossain, M. S., & Wenger, D. (2024). Has Journalism Education Kept Up With Digital Transformation? Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 79(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958231224038
  • Luengo, M., & Herrera-Damas, S. (2021). News Media Innovation Reconsidered: Ethics and Values in a Creative Reconstruction of Journalism. In News Media Innovation Reconsidered: Ethics and Values in a Creative Reconstruction of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119706519
  • Marconi, F. (2021). Newsmakers: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Journalism. Columbia Journalism School.
  • Paulussen, S. (2016) Innovation in the Newsroom. In Tamara Witschge, C.W. Anderson, David Domingo,and Alfred Hermida (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism. London: Sage, pp. 192-206. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311948168_Innovation_in_the_Newsroom
  • Pérez-Escoda, A., Ortega Fernández, E., & Pedrero Esteban, L. M. (2022). Digital literacy to combat fake news: Strategies and gaps among university students. Revista Prisma Social, (38), 221–243. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/4696
  • Peña-Fernández, S., Meso-Ayerdi, K., Larrondo-Ureta, A., & Díaz-Noci, J. (2023). Without journalists, there is no journalism: the social dimension of generative artificial intelligence in the media | Sin periodistas, no hay periodismo. La dimensión social de la inteligencia artificial generativa en los medios de comunicación. Profesional de La Informacion, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.mar.27
  • Sonni, A. F., Hafied, H., Irwanto, I., & Latuheru, R. (2024). Digital Newsroom Transformation: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Journalistic Practices, News Narratives, and Ethical Challenges. Journalism and Media, 5(4), 1554–1570. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040097
  • Tejedor, S., & Vila, P. (2021). Exo Journalism: A Conceptual Approach to a Hybrid Formula between Journalism and Artificial Intelligence. Journalism and Media, 2(4), 830–840. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2040048
  • Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2021). Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Council of Europe.

Prof. Dr. Eglée Ortega Fernández
Prof. Dr. Carmen Llovet
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journalism and Media is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • journalistic innovation
  • artificial intelligence
  • digital transformation
  • new narrative platforms
  • journalism education
  • media literacy
  • disinformation
  • immersive journalism

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 963 KB  
Article
Poor Journalism as a Distinct Phenomenon from Disinformation: Definition and Taxonomy
by Ernesto García-Ojeda and Marta Saavedra
Journal. Media 2026, 7(2), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7020087 - 22 Apr 2026
Viewed by 545
Abstract
Disinformation has become one of the main contemporary social and political concerns. However, both public and academic debates continue to exhibit an epistemological confusion between disinformation—characterized by a deliberate intention to deceive—and the errors or deficiencies arising from journalistic practice. The aim of [...] Read more.
Disinformation has become one of the main contemporary social and political concerns. However, both public and academic debates continue to exhibit an epistemological confusion between disinformation—characterized by a deliberate intention to deceive—and the errors or deficiencies arising from journalistic practice. The aim of this study is to conceptually define these errors under the phenomenon of poor journalism and to propose a taxonomy that allows it to be examined as distinct from disinformation. To this end, a qualitative integrative systematic review was conducted, based on the inductive analysis of peer-reviewed academic publications in Spanish and English, indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO Host. The analysis identifies two main analytical dimensions: deficient practices and structural causes. The findings show that poor journalism does not stem from a deliberate intention to deceive, but rather from structural factors, commercial logics, and corporate interests within the media ecosystem. This phenomenon is intensified by a circular logic in which the same causes that generate it also reinforce it. This study helps to clarify a relevant conceptual gap by offering a definition and a taxonomy that may be used in future research and media literacy initiatives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining Journalism in the Era of Digital Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 613 KB  
Article
Spanish Investigative Journalism in the Face of Verification and Information Disorders
by María Alcalá-Santaella, Roberto Gelado Marcos and Fernando Bonete Vizcaíno
Journal. Media 2026, 7(2), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7020084 - 21 Apr 2026
Viewed by 490
Abstract
This research focuses on the perception that Spanish investigative journalists have of disinformation, exploring its impact on their professional routines. It also assesses the methods deployed by these professionals to mitigate its spread. To this end, a quantitative methodology based on the survey [...] Read more.
This research focuses on the perception that Spanish investigative journalists have of disinformation, exploring its impact on their professional routines. It also assesses the methods deployed by these professionals to mitigate its spread. To this end, a quantitative methodology based on the survey technique was used, and a structured interview comprising 18 questions was designed. This interview combined 7 closed questions with a five-point Likert-type scale structure and 11 open-ended questions to ascertain the perceptions of respondents more accurately. The survey involved 28 journalists from the Association of Investigative Journalists (API, its Spanish acronym) and various relevant media outlets. The results underline the rigor and independence required in investigative journalism to combat disinformation while drawing attention to the need to train and adapt the practice of journalism through new formats. The tension between the potential of technology and uneasiness about its reliability—an ambivalence that is on the rise with the emergence of AI—is also emphasized alongside the importance of ethics and transparency to restore the credibility of the media. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining Journalism in the Era of Digital Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 265 KB  
Article
Human Competencies at the Edge of Automation: A Qualitative Study of AI Integration in Frontline Journalism
by Hyeyun Jung
Journal. Media 2026, 7(2), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7020082 - 14 Apr 2026
Viewed by 555
Abstract
The integration of AI into journalism has intensified debates about the future of news production, yet existing scholarship has focused predominantly on AI’s capabilities rather than on irreplaceable human competencies. This study shifts analytical focus from replacement to complementarity, investigating the boundaries of [...] Read more.
The integration of AI into journalism has intensified debates about the future of news production, yet existing scholarship has focused predominantly on AI’s capabilities rather than on irreplaceable human competencies. This study shifts analytical focus from replacement to complementarity, investigating the boundaries of AI through the perspectives of both journalists and AI developers. Ten participants—including field reporters, news anchors, broadcast journalists, and AI developers—were interviewed through in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis revealed three core dimensions of irreplaceable human competency: embodied presence and rapport-building, contextual judgment and meaning-making, and investigative initiative requiring moral agency. Practitioners and developers converged on AI’s persistent limitations in factual reliability, emotional authenticity, and ethical accountability. Based on these findings, a three-tier human–AI collaborative model is proposed, allocating computational tasks to AI while preserving human authority over editorial judgment, source relationships, and ethical decisions. These findings contribute to human–machine communication theory, extend algorithmic journalism literature beyond capability assessments, and offer practical implications for newsroom workflow design, journalism education, and AI governance. Findings are situated within the Korean media context and should be interpreted accordingly, with implications that may extend to other broadcasting-oriented journalism cultures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining Journalism in the Era of Digital Innovation)
29 pages, 3711 KB  
Article
Artificial Intelligence Chatbots as Assistants for Media Users: The Cases of El País and El Espectador
by Gema Sánchez-Muñoz, Isabel García Casado and David Varona Aramburu
Journal. Media 2026, 7(1), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7010059 - 18 Mar 2026
Viewed by 732
Abstract
In recent months, some media outlets have been launching artificial intelligence-based chatbots that serve as assistants to users in their search, selection and consumption of content. This research analyses two such examples: Vera, a conversational assistant launched by the Spanish newspaper El País, [...] Read more.
In recent months, some media outlets have been launching artificial intelligence-based chatbots that serve as assistants to users in their search, selection and consumption of content. This research analyses two such examples: Vera, a conversational assistant launched by the Spanish newspaper El País, and the model used by the Colombian newspaper El Espectador, which operates on the WhatsApp platform. Both chatbots share the same approach: they are tools designed for users to interact with newspaper content. This interaction takes place through natural language conversations: the technology understands ‘users’ questions or requests and provides answers based on the content hosted in the newspapers. This changes the way media content is explored. We are moving from a paradigm centred on search engines and keywords to one in which conversation determines the discovery of content. The research analyses the results of these two pioneering experiences in the Spanish-language media. The aim is to understand the extent to which they are changing the relationship with content and how they are affecting the media. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining Journalism in the Era of Digital Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2628 KB  
Article
News Infographics and Slow Journalism in Líbero Football Magazine: From Hallmarks to Secondary Resources
by Borja Ventura-Salom, María Tabuenca Bengoa and Laura González-Díez
Journal. Media 2026, 7(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7010051 - 5 Mar 2026
Viewed by 553
Abstract
This paper explores the use of infographics by Líbero magazine, which is a benchmark of design and the epitome of slow journalism in Spain. The aim is to pinpoint the characteristics and role of these graphic features at a time when visual data [...] Read more.
This paper explores the use of infographics by Líbero magazine, which is a benchmark of design and the epitome of slow journalism in Spain. The aim is to pinpoint the characteristics and role of these graphic features at a time when visual data journalism is becoming crucial in sports publications. This case study is based on analysing all 52 issues published by Líbero throughout its history. The authors apply a triangulation methodology that combines several techniques: qualitative, including content analysis based on an ad hoc form, designed to formally describe the purposes of the infographics, along with semi-structured in-depth interviews; and qualitative techniques, used to address the statistical aspect. The findings indicate a regular presence of infographics in the early issues, which were complex and large, yet with a strong emphasis on international football matches. However, the last few years of the sample reflect a trend towards gradual simplification of the infographics, together with less frequent use. Data suggest infographics are used to create complex narratives with simple visual compositions in order to improve the reader’s understanding of data that accompanies a journalistic story. This is consistent with Líbero’s commitment to slow journalism, which focuses on detailed explanations and in-depth information. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining Journalism in the Era of Digital Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1104 KB  
Article
Disinformation and Journalistic Routines in Health Reporting: A Study of Professional Practices in the Coverage of Health Content Aimed at People over 74
by Mario Benito-Cabello, Gustavo Montes-Rodríguez and Casandra López-Marcos
Journal. Media 2026, 7(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia7010018 - 28 Jan 2026
Viewed by 487
Abstract
This article analyses the professional routines of health journalists in Spain, and their role in tackling disinformation in health reporting targeted at people over the age of 74. It is based on the premise that this age group, being highly exposed to health [...] Read more.
This article analyses the professional routines of health journalists in Spain, and their role in tackling disinformation in health reporting targeted at people over the age of 74. It is based on the premise that this age group, being highly exposed to health issues and particularly vulnerable to health-related misinformation, requires content that is tailored, reliable and easy to understand. The research adopts an exploratory-descriptive approach through a self-administered questionnaire addressed to health journalists belonging to professional associations and working in both general and specialist media outlets. As this is an ongoing study, the preliminary results indicate that these professionals report applying rigorous verification mechanisms, which suggests a trend within the surveyed group towards the consolidation of practices against disinformation. The findings also reveal a preference for informative styles that avoid sensationalism and prioritise clarity, although there remains a tendency towards high-impact topics and those linked to media figures. In contrast, attention to the informational needs of older adults is limited and addressed only occasionally. The study concludes that, although the interviewed professionals consider that health journalism in Spain maintains high standards of rigor, it still faces the challenge of systematically adapting its communicative practices to the needs of vulnerable audiences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining Journalism in the Era of Digital Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 498 KB  
Article
Are the Media Transparent in Their Use of AI? Self-Regulation and Ethical Challenges in Newsrooms in Spain
by M. Ángeles Fernández-Barrero and Carlos Serrano-Martín
Journal. Media 2025, 6(3), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030152 - 13 Sep 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4474
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into journalism is rapidly transforming the way news is produced, raising important questions about ethics, transparency, and professional standards. This study examines how Spanish journalists perceive and manage the use of AI in their work. A mixed [...] Read more.
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into journalism is rapidly transforming the way news is produced, raising important questions about ethics, transparency, and professional standards. This study examines how Spanish journalists perceive and manage the use of AI in their work. A mixed methods research design is used, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative component consists of a survey administered to a sample of 50 journalists working in newsrooms in various Spanish provinces, selected by random sampling. The qualitative component involves eight in-depth interviews with journalists representing various perspectives on AI use. Although AI improves efficiency in news production, it also introduces ethical concerns, particularly about transparency, authorship, and content accuracy. In the absence of formal regulation, some media and scientific institutions have begun to develop self-regulation protocols. The findings reveal widespread use of AI tools among journalists, although a minority strongly opposes them. Most media outlets lack internal policies on AI use, leading to reliance on personal self-regulation. Transparency is a major concern, as AI involvement is rarely disclosed, raising issues of trust, intellectual property, and editorial responsibility. The lack of clear internal guidelines creates uncertainty and inconsistent practices. Journalists are calling for defined regulatory frameworks to ensure ethical and transparent integration of AI. Without transparency, audience trust can be eroded and journalistic integrity can be compromised. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reimagining Journalism in the Era of Digital Innovation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop