Generative AI and Digital Humanities Narrative Reconstruction

A special issue of Future Collections, Libraries, Archives, and Museums (ISSN 3043-0550).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2026 | Viewed by 282

Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
Interests: knowledge organization and retrieval; smart libraries

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Information Management, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
Interests: data privacy protection; user information behavior; information systems

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is fundamentally transforming how narratives are constructed, interpreted, and experienced within digital humanities. From large language models rewriting literary classics to multimodal AI generating immersive historical reconstructions, these technologies are redefining the boundaries of storytelling, authorship, and cultural representation. However, this transformative potential raises critical questions about authenticity, agency, ethics, and the very nature of humanistic inquiry in the age of machine-generated content.

This Special Issue aims to explore the intersection of generative AI and digital humanities, with a particular focus on how AI-driven tools and methodologies are reshaping narrative practices. We invite contributions that examine both the theoretical implications and practical applications of generative AI in reconstructing, reimagining, and re-presenting humanistic narratives through digital means.

We seek interdisciplinary research that addresses how generative models—including but not limited to large language models (LLMs), diffusion models, and multimodal architectures—are being employed to create new forms of digital storytelling, interactive heritage experiences, and computational narratology. Equally important are critical reflections on the epistemological, ethical, and sociocultural implications of delegating narrative authority to artificial systems.

This Special Issue provides a dedicated platform for scholars, practitioners, and critics to examine how generative AI is reconfiguring the relationship between technology and narrative in the humanities. We welcome submissions that combine technical innovation with humanistic rigor, offering new insights into how AI can both enhance and challenge traditional modes of narrative construction and interpretation.

Possible Topics of Submissions:

This Special Issue is interested in, but not limited to, the following topics:

  • Posthuman authorship and narrative agency in human–AI collaborative systems;
  • Ontology and epistemology of machine-generated narratives: truth, plausibility, and narrative theory revisited;
  • Ethical frameworks for AI-generated narratives: authenticity, bias, and cultural representation;
  • Large language models for adaptive storytelling and interactive narrative generation;
  • Multimodal generative systems for reconstructing historical events, artifacts, and environments;
  • Human–AI co-narration: how users engage, negotiate, and co-construct meaning with generative narrative systems;
  • Evaluating AI-generated narratives: metrics, benchmarks, and qualitative assessment frameworks;
  • Immersive and embodied generative narratives for participatory heritage experiences;
  • Digital archives and generative interfaces: reanimating collections through narrative AI;
  • Generative AI and narrative equity: accessibility, diversity, and pluralism in digital storytelling;
  • Generative AI as a research method in digital humanities.

Prof. Dr. Dan Wu
Prof. Dr. Bailing Liu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-anonymized peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Future Collections, Libraries, Archives, and Museums is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • adaptive storytelling
  • artificial intelligence
  • benchmarks
  • chatbots
  • computational methods
  • conversational interfaces
  • cultural heritage
  • cultural representation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

41 pages, 723 KB  
Review
When the Machine Speaks for the Collection: Deployed Generative AI in Museums and Art Galleries—A Scoping Review
by Anna Małgorzata Kamińska
Future Collect. Libr. Arch. Mus. 2027, 1(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/fclam1010003 - 22 Aug 2026
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence has begun to answer for the collection in the institution’s own voice, yet commentary has accumulated far faster than working systems have been documented, and no prior review identified by this search has consolidated and critically read the record of [...] Read more.
Generative artificial intelligence has begun to answer for the collection in the institution’s own voice, yet commentary has accumulated far faster than working systems have been documented, and no prior review identified by this search has consolidated and critically read the record of what has actually been deployed. Using a single open bibliographic index (OpenAlex)—chosen for reach and reproducibility, at the acknowledged cost of studies indexed only elsewhere—and a scoping protocol, this review narrows the literature to the systems genuinely placed in a working museum or gallery and observed in use, and maps them onto a function-based taxonomy. From a de-duplicated pool of more than eight thousand records, twenty-eight works describing twenty-seven distinct deployments are included. Three centers of gravity emerge: conversational guides that address the visitor, co-creative installations that make the act of generation the exhibit, and behind-the-scenes tools that read and catalog the collection. Against that map, the review weighs the evidence, confining every judgment of how well a system worked to the six studies that meet the review’s predefined evaluation-strength criteria. The result is a field whose map is clear while its proof is thin: the deployments can be named and sorted with confidence, but evidence that any delivers what it promises rests on a handful of cases, and the one production-scale system is also the only one tested at scale. Education, access, and audience understanding are almost absent from the record this search retrieved. The review closes with evidence-calibrated guidance for institutions weighing a deployment—a decision aid, a set of questions to put to a vendor, and stage-by-stage recommendations for selection, implementation, and evaluation, each marked with the strength of the evidence behind it—and an agenda redirecting the field toward the civic work it has set aside. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Generative AI and Digital Humanities Narrative Reconstruction)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop