Financialization of Commodities Markets

A special issue of Commodities (ISSN 2813-2432).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 March 2025 | Viewed by 4328

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Finance and Real Estate Department, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA
Interests: NASDAQ stock market; managed investment fund; day trading; initial public offerings (IPOs); electronic trading; futures trading in commodity markets; trading behavior

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, Via Marengo, 2, 09123 Cagliari, Italy
Interests: renewable energy; investment analysis; project financing; public–private partnership; Islamic finance; agricultural economics; circular economy; corporate social responsibility; productivity analysis; organizational models; digital innovation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Chair of Finance, Department of Business and Economics, University of Basel, 4002 Basel, Switzerland
Interests: empirical asset pricing; derivatives; volatility of financial markets and commodities

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Materially, the financialization of commodity markets began almost two centuries ago when the risks of commodity markets were transferred to financial investors through forward and other derivative contracts. However, the term has been more recently coined for when institutional investors, mainly through commodity swaps and derived indexed products, increase exposure to this market segment using modern portfolio theory as a guide. Using swap dealers as the main conduit to established futures markets, the associated institutions have been perceived as having a significant influence on price formation and, in particular, volatility. The term “financialization” is often associated with the claim that commodity price movements are being increasingly driven by financial (portfolio) considerations and less by commodity-specific factors. Some argue that this leads to excessive price volatility and, thus, to higher real costs and potential welfare losses for commercial participants in the commodity sector. These conjectures have triggered a large body of empirical research investigating the price discovery process in commodity and commodity futures markets, paying particular attention to the role of “financial” investors.

We are seeking papers that can be grouped, according to the research questions they address, into three categories: First, papers about the impact of financial investors (sometimes coined as “speculation”) on commodity price level, returns, or risk premiums. Second, papers that examine the impact of speculation on price volatility—either commodity specific or considering the market segment (index) as a whole. This also includes research on the impact of speculation on the price discovery process, i.e., the adjustment of spot vs. futures prices on macroeconomic and financial market disturbances. This leads to the third strand of research, namely the transmission of shocks between (and within) commodity markets. Such research focuses on the lead–lag relations of various market segments in relation to speculative activity (as separate from the correlation effects of financialization and their impact on risk diversification).

With this Special Issue, we seek to provide insight related to the empirical findings on financialization, including assessments of the impact of data quality, specification of variables (e.g., futures prices and returns, speculation proxies), model selection and estimation (including estimation periods), and choice of asset universe. We seek papers that are particularly focused on empirical and methodological questions and provide insight on the sensitivity of empirical findings against sample selection, variable measurement, and model specification.

Although the number of research papers on financialization has sharply increased in the past two decades, the metastudy of Haase, Seiler, and Zimmermann (J Commod Mark, 2016), covering some 100 published papers, indicates that the quality of some published papers is extremely heterogeneous in terms of methodology, data, and empirical measures, such that the results are often not traceable and difficult to compare. This calls for further, careful empirical research utilizing more recent data.

Prof. Dr. Jeffrey H. Harris
Dr. Donato Morea
Prof. Dr. Heinz Zimmermann
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Commodities is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1000 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • commodity index trading
  • speculation in commodity markets
  • price discovery
  • the transmission of shocks between financial markets and commodities

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 701 KiB  
Article
Time-Varying Deterministic Volatility Model for Options on Wheat Futures
by Marco Haase and Jacqueline Henn
Commodities 2024, 3(3), 334-354; https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities3030019 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 735
Abstract
This study introduces a robust model that captures wheat futures’ volatility dynamics, influenced by seasonality, time to maturity, and storage dynamics, with minimal calibratable parameters. Our approach reduces error-proneness and enhances plausibility checks, offering a reliable alternative to models that are difficult to [...] Read more.
This study introduces a robust model that captures wheat futures’ volatility dynamics, influenced by seasonality, time to maturity, and storage dynamics, with minimal calibratable parameters. Our approach reduces error-proneness and enhances plausibility checks, offering a reliable alternative to models that are difficult to calibrate. Transferring estimated parameters from liquid to illiquid markets is feasible, which is challenging for models with numerous parameters. This is of practical importance as it improves the modeling of volatility in illiquid markets, where price discovery is less efficient. In liquid markets, on the other hand, where speculative activity is high, we find that implied volatility is usually the best measure. Additionally, the introduced volatility model is suitable for pricing options on wheat futures as a risk-neutral measure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financialization of Commodities Markets)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2501 KiB  
Article
Does “Paper Oil” Matter? Energy Markets’ Financialization and Co-Movements with Equity Markets
by Bahattin Büyükşahin and Michel A. Robe
Commodities 2024, 3(2), 197-224; https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities3020013 - 23 May 2024
Viewed by 1032
Abstract
We revisit, and document new facts regarding, the financialization of U.S. energy markets in 2000–2010. We show that, after controlling for macroeconomic factors and physical energy market fundamentals, the strength of energy markets’ co-movements with the U.S. stock market is positively related to [...] Read more.
We revisit, and document new facts regarding, the financialization of U.S. energy markets in 2000–2010. We show that, after controlling for macroeconomic factors and physical energy market fundamentals, the strength of energy markets’ co-movements with the U.S. stock market is positively related to the energy paper market activity of hedge funds that trade both asset classes. This relation weakens when credit risk is elevated. We find, in contrast, no link with the aggregate positions of commodity index traders in energy futures markets. Our findings have implications for the ongoing debate regarding the financialization of commodities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financialization of Commodities Markets)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 2128 KiB  
Article
Crude Oil Price Movements and Institutional Traders
by Celso Brunetti, Jeffrey H. Harris and Bahattin Büyükşahin
Commodities 2024, 3(1), 75-97; https://doi.org/10.3390/commodities3010006 - 29 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1408
Abstract
We analyze the role of hedge fund, swap dealer, and arbitrageur activity in the crude oil market. The contribution of our work is to examine the role of institutional traders in switching between high-volatility and low-volatility regimes. Using confidential position data on institutional [...] Read more.
We analyze the role of hedge fund, swap dealer, and arbitrageur activity in the crude oil market. The contribution of our work is to examine the role of institutional traders in switching between high-volatility and low-volatility regimes. Using confidential position data on institutional investors, we first analyze the linkages between trader positions and fundamentals. We find that these institutional position changes reflect fundamental economic factors. Subsequently, we adopt a Markov regime-switching model with time-varying probabilities and find that institutional position changes contribute incrementally to the probability of regime changes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financialization of Commodities Markets)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Planned Papers

The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.

Title: Time-varying deterministic volatility model for options on wheat futures
Authors: Marco Hasse; Jacqueline Henn
Affiliation: Department of Finance, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel, Peter Merian Weg 6, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
Abstract: This study introduces a robust model that captures wheat futures volatility dynamics, influenced by seasonality, time to maturity, and storage dynamics, with minimal calibratable parameters. Our approach reduces error-proneness and enhances plausibility checks, offering a reliable alternative to models that are difficult to calibrate. Transferring estimated parameters from liquid to illiquid markets is feasible, which is challenging for models with numerous parameters. This is of practical importance as it improves the modelling of volatility in illiquid markets, where price discovery is less efficient. In liquid markets, on the other hand, where speculative activity is high, we find that implied volatility is usually the best measure. Additionally, the introduced volatility model is suitable for pricing options on wheat futures in a risk-neutral measure.

Back to TopTop