Next Article in Journal
Theileria terrestris nov. sp.: A Novel Theileria in Lowland Tapirs (Tapirus terrestris) from Two Different Biomes in Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Emiliania huxleyi—Bacteria Interactions under Increasing CO2 Concentrations
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Time-Point Fecal Sampling in Human and Mouse Reveals the Formation of New Homeostasis in Gut Microbiota after Bowel Cleansing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Algae as Feedstuff for Ruminants: A Focus on Single-Cell Species, Opportunistic Use of Algal By-Products and On-Site Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Versatile Applications of Cyanobacteria in Biotechnology

by
Ewa Żymańczyk-Duda
*,
Sunday Ocholi Samson
*,
Małgorzata Brzezińska-Rodak
and
Magdalena Klimek-Ochab
Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biotechnology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 29, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(12), 2318; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122318
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Revised: 9 November 2022 / Accepted: 21 November 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022

Abstract

:
Cyanobacteria are blue-green Gram-negative and photosynthetic bacteria which are seen as one of the most morphologically numerous groups of prokaryotes. Because of their ability to fix gaseous nitrogen and carbon dioxide to organic materials, they are known to play important roles in the universal nutrient cycle. Cyanobacteria has emerged as one of the promising resources to combat the issues of global warming, disease outbreaks, nutrition insecurity, energy crises as well as persistent daily human population increases. Cyanobacteria possess significant levels of macro and micronutrient substances which facilitate the versatile popularity to be utilized as human food and protein supplements in many countries such as Asia. Cyanobacteria has been employed as a complementary dietary constituent of feed for poultry and as vitamin and protein supplement in aquatic lives. They are effectively used to deal with numerous tasks in various fields of biotechnology, such as agricultural (including aquaculture), industrial (food and dairy products), environmental (pollution control), biofuel (bioenergy) and pharmaceutical biotechnology (such as antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressant, anticoagulant and antitumor); recently, the growing interest of applying them as biocatalysts has been observed as well. Cyanobacteria are known to generate a numerous variety of bioactive compounds. However, the versatile potential applications of cyanobacteria in biotechnology could be their significant growth rate and survival in severe environmental conditions due to their distinct and unique metabolic pathways as well as active defensive mechanisms. In this review, we elaborated on the versatile cyanobacteria applications in different areas of biotechnology. We also emphasized the factors that could impede the implementation to cyanobacteria applications in biotechnology and the execution of strategies to enhance their effective applications.

1. Introduction

Cyanobacteria are blue-green algae that generate biomasses via the conversion of carbon dioxide using solar energy [1]. Cyanobacteria have a wide variety of colors such as pink, red, yellow, green and brown [2], and they exist in diverse ecosystems such as in rock surfaces, oceans, soil and freshwater [3]. It is important to know that cyanobacteria are the first universal oxygen-producing photosynthetic microbes and for many billions of years, they have contributed to the universe’s oxygen generation [4]. Cyanobacteria are microscopic organisms; however, they could be observed via unaided eyes in the form of blooms or colonies [5,6]. The potential of cyanobacteria to adapt to several environmental conditions, ability to generate oxygen and simple genomes (enabling easy manipulations), as sources of bioactive compounds, and their fast growth rate have prompted many researchers to perform thorough investigations on cyanobacteria as supplements in human food, animal feed, in industry and in medicine [7,8]. However, alterations in climate change, global warming, nutrients availability and biotic factors determine the rapid growth rate of cyanobacteria [9,10,11].
Cyanobacteria are abundant sources of bioactive compounds. Their secondary metabolites are rich sources of vitamins, enzymes and toxins which are crucial in many biotechnological industries [7], for instance, in the production of bioplastics from cyanobacteria’s polyhydroxy-alkanoates (PHA) [12,13]. PHA accumulates intracellularly in many cyanobacteria species, which can be utilized in bioplastics production with properties such as polyethylene and polypropylene [12]. A wide variety cyanotoxins have been generated from cyanobacteria [14]. These bioactive compounds among others include saxitoxins, microcystins, and anatoxins [15]. This review emerged to broadly elaborate the important roles of cyanobacteria in biotechnology.

2. Cyanobacterial Metabolites

Cyanobacteria exhibit metabolic processes such carotenogenesis and photosynthesis, which generate highly valued primary and secondary metabolites. Primary metabolites are those metabolites that are strictly involved in processes such as reproduction, growth and cell division, which are referred to as developmental processes [15]. Primary metabolites include antioxidants, primary proteins and lipids [16]. These metabolites could be re-engineered to produce important biotechnological products such as dyes, biofertilizers, food supplements and bioplastics [17,18,19,20]. However, secondary metabolites are not used by cyanobacterial cells and are not directly engaged in their normal growth, reproduction or development [21]. Secondary metabolites are typically distinctive to specific organisms and are not regularly available in all environmental conditions. Hence, they are produced for defensive purposes [22]. Secondary metabolites from cyanobacteria include toxins, phenolic compounds, essential oils, alkaloids, steroids and antibiotics [23,24,25,26,27,28,29].
Previous epidemiological research revealed that cyanobacteria have a quite simple genetic material [30], enabling easy manipulations and modifications for the discovery of new important metabolites. These metabolites could be produced naturally from cyanobacteria via their responses to environmental stresses such as alteration of light intensity and deficiencies in micro and macro nutrients, which could alter their photosynthetic cellular metabolism [31].
Chen et al. [32] elucidated the manipulation of cyanobacteria growth conditions by comparing two phases. In the first phase, the cyanobacteria were allowed to grow in suitable and favorable conditions, whereas in the second phase, cyanobacteria were allowed to grow in unfavorable environmental conditions such as nitrogen deficiency, elevated intensity of light and deficiency of nutrients. The results revealed significant levels of secondary metabolites such as essential oils, starch granules, lipids and biopolymers from the second phase when compared to the first stage [32,33]. Rachana et al. [34] uncovered the exploitation of the cyanobacteria metabolic pathway (Methylerythritol 4-phosphate, MEP) to generate valuable secondary metabolites such as chlorophyll, fatty acids, and hormones. These products possess antimicrobial, antibiotic and anticarcinogenic properties that facilitate their active roles in pharmaceutical industries [34,35].

2.1. Phenolic Acids

Phenolic acids are aromatic rings consisting of one or more hydroxyl groups and one carboxyl group. Phenolic acids produced by cyanobacteria are essential for the defense against oxidative destruction that could result from hydroxyl radicals and the reactive oxygen species [36]. The buildup of phenolic acids in cyanobacteria ensures the adaptability and tolerance of cyanobacteria against several environmental stresses such as interaction with heavy metals and UV light [37,38], which could result in the deposition of free radicals in cells, damage to deoxyribose and chemical destruction of DNA [39].
As an example, Singh et al. [40] investigated how phenolic acids produced by cyanobacteria played an important role in the rummaging of free radicals and ensuring tolerance and adaptability when the cultures of various cyanobacteria species (Oscillatoria acuta, Plectonema boryanum, Anabaena doliolum and Haplosiphon intricatus) were subjected to a high sodium chloride concentrations (considered as unfavorable condition). The experimental results revealed significant accumulation of phenolic acids including vanillic acid, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid and ferulic acid [40]. In another instance, Tanutcha et al. [41] revealed that the treatment of the cyanobacteria specie, Halothece sp. PCC7418 cells with temperature shock allowed for the robust production of phenolic compounds and phycobiliproteins. The quantification of phenolic compounds and phycobiliproteins in aqueous extracts showed that the amounts of the metabolites were regulated by the hot and cold temperature shocks [41].
Phenolic acids produced by cyanobacteria with great scavenging of free radicals and detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) facilitated their relevance as therapeutic agents. For instance, anti-winkle and skin whitening facilitated by ferulic acids [42], anti-aging effect facilitated by gallic acids [43], effective heart failure recovery facilitated by syringic, gentisic and gallic acids [44], as well as antimicrobial effects of other phenolic compounds were generated by cyanobacteria [45,46,47].

2.2. Vitamins

Vitamins participate in many metabolic pathways, acting as coenzymes. They also engage in diverse processes such as antioxidants, controlling and regulating cell functioning and growth of tissues [48]. There are various categories of vitamins utilized by living organisms. These include lipid-soluble vitamins (vitamin A, D, E, and K) and water-soluble vitamins (vitamin B1, B2, B3, B5, B6, B7, B9, B12 and C). Cyanobacteria produce vitamin A, B, C, E and K in response to environmental stress, as elucidated by Helliwell et al. [49] and Asensi-Fabado et al. [50]. Deficiency of vitamins in humans is a significant menace globally and necessitates immediate attention. In the notion for bioactive metabolites generation, cyanobacteria denote one of the most capable potentials with many biotechnological applications and for allowing the advancement of an eco-sustainable creation of natural bioactive metabolites. It is important to know that not all vitamins are generated by all plants and some vitamin (B, D and K) are scarce in many plants [48,50]. Hence, cyanobacteria have been demonstrated to generate these vitamins that are scarce in several vascular plants [48]. Individuals acquire significant number of vitamins via the consumption of fruits, vegetables and dairy products such meat, fish and eggs. However, an individual with some vitamins’ deficiency could be treated with artificial or synthetic vitamin, through oral or intramuscular delivery of vitamins: B12 (oral and intramuscular), D1 (oral ergocalciferol), C (oral) and K1 (intramuscular) [51,52,53,54,55].
Cyanobacterial products are fascinating and have gained increasing attention because of their high contents in vitamins, minerals, essential amino acids and protein [56]. As an example, Spirulina products are extensively promoted due to their high contents of vitamin B12, high contents of protein (>60%) and additional micronutrients [56]. Spirulina is known to be an important vitamin B12 source for vegans and vegetarians, as chemical analyses showed that vitamin B12 dry weight levels range from 127 to 244 μg/100 g [57]. The range could be rendered into a day-to-day Spirulina intake of 1.6–3.2 g to reach the satisfactory consumption of 4 μg/day for cobalamin (vitamin B12) according to the EFSA [58]. However, the suppliers of Spirulina suggested a regular intake of 3–9 g/day would be efficient to enhance vitamin B12 requirements [59]. So far, Arthrospira sp. (Spirulina) has been made accessible for human intake as a nutritional supplementto combat the deficiency of Vitamin B12 especially, thereby improving bone strength and stiffness as well as inhibiting the formation of ulcers [60,61]. In addition, numerous studies have showed the medicinal important of Spirulina as a rich source vitamin E and β-carotene. Previous investigation by Carcea et al. [62] revealed the generation of vitamin E from Spirulina with the content ranging between 2.8 and 12.5 mg/100 g in improved techniques and higher in traditionally dried Spirulina [62]. From the experimental samples, th etraditionally dried technique was recorded to be 30.9 mg/100 g content of vitamin E [62]. Research also showed a significant amount of β-carotene in Spirulina where the content varied between 33.5 and 231.6 mg/100 g) [62]. High contents of β-carotene were also examined in Synechoccus sp. and Anabaena cylindrica and in some fruits such as oranges, potatoes, broccoli and carrots [48,63].
Excluding the vascular plants, Anabaena cylindrica is also an exceptional source of vitamin C, an antioxidant that could offer a defensive mechanism against oxidants in cyanobacteria [64]. In response to UV radiation stress and preventing destruction of cell membrane, cyanobacteria (Arthrospira sp.) could generate a low amount of vitamin D [65,66]. Tarento et al. [67]. emphasized that a significant amount of vitamin K1 could be experimentally examined in the marine plant Anabaena cylindrica compared to the content of vitamin K1 in parsley and spinach [67].

2.3. Peptides

Peptides are small proteins which can be categorized based on their biosynthesis into ribosomal peptides (gene encoded) and non-ribosomal peptides (non-gene encoded). They could also be categorized according to their 3D-structure, covalent binding and modification, source, properties and function [68]. Peptides and polyketides biosynthesis in microbes have exceptional segmental pathways controlled by non-ribosomal peptides (NRPs) and polyketides (PKs). Polyketides (PKs) and non-ribosomal peptides (NRPs) are extensively useful as drugs today, and one possible source for new PKs and NRPs are cyanobacteria. However, there is limited information on the varieties of microorganisms and their PKs and NRPs biosynthetic genes in the marine deposit [69]. NRPS includes components, each of which joins proteinogenic amino acids with non-proteinogenic amino acids, carbohydrates, fatty acids and additional building blocks to form peptide chains [69]. Natural products of PKs and NRPs are secondary metabolites of microbes, used by microbes in adaptation and resistance to environmental stresses [69]. So far, over twenty three thousands natural products of non-ribosomal peptides and polyketides have been recognized and categorized, and they had been extensively applied in medicine as antitumor and antibiotic therapies [70,71].
Biological synthesis of PKs and NRPs are catalyzed by polyketide synthases (PKS) and non-ribosomal peptide synthases (NRPS) [72]. Remarkably, the gene clusters of NRPS and PKS commonly exist in microbes, such as cyanobacteria, compared with eurkarya or archaea [72]. Previous investigations revealed that these gene clusters exist in Anabaena, Nostoc, Lyngbya, Planktothrix, Microcystism, Pleurocapsa and Nodularia genera. However, Nostoc and Pleurocapsa species are known as the common NRP- and PK-producing cyanobacteria [73].
Ribosomal peptides (RPs) are proteinogenic amino acids that can be observed on ribosomes that are used as building blocks in ribosomal peptides’ biosynthesis [68,74]. Cyanobacteria also generates lanthipeptides, one of the major ribosomal peptide families including microviridins and cyanobactin. The potential of cyanobacteria to generate lanthipeptides is due to the availability of class II lenthipeptidase and prochlorosins in their genome (such as the marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus) [75,76,77].

2.4. Terpenoids

Terpenoids are known to be the largest group of bioactive compounds. They are categorized into carotenoids, sesterterpenoids, steroids, hemiterpenoids, diterpenoids, sesquiterpenoids and monoterpenoids. Research shows that over fifty five thousands terpenoids have been discovered so far [78,79]. Triterpenoids were found in a significant amount both in natural cyanobacterium-dominated microbial mats and in laboratory cyanobacterial cultures, for instance, in 2-methylhopanoids (2-MeBHPs) [80,81]. 2-methylhopanoids (2-MeBHPs) belong to pentacyclic triterpenoids, which act as biomarkers for enhanced cyanobacteria in some ecological sites [81]. In addition, 2-MeBHP encourages thawing and freezing resistance, pH stress resistance and osmotic pressure resistance in cyanobacteria to ensure their existence in unfavorable environments such as hot springs, arctic and Antarctic soils, desert soil crusts and in high saline lakes [82,83].
Carotenoids, also known as tetraterpenoids, are important for energy dissipation and light-harvesting during the process of photosynthesis [83,84]. Examples of common carotenoids synthesized by cyanobacteria include zeaxanthin, echinenone and β-carotene. Kusama et al. [85] highlighted the importance of zeaxanthin and echinenone to shield PSII (photosystem II) against singlet oxygen [85]. In addition, for protection against direct UV-B radiation, Pseudanabaena sp. CCNU1 generates β-carotene, zeaxanthin, echinenone, myxoxanthophyll and canthaxanthin [84]. Carotenoids are necessary to provide protection against photooxidative destruction resulting from direct UV light during the photosynthesis process. Carotenoids are secondary metabolites (lipophilic) generated from the pathways of isoprenoids [84]. Filamentous Calothrix PCC 7507 and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 have been shown to generate sesquiterpenoid geosmin, a sesquiterpene with no isopropyl group [86,87].
Recent studies revealed the biological activities of cyanobacterial carotenoids as a source of medicine for the treatment of several infections. For example, carotenoids and their derivatives obtained from cyanobacteria proved high superoxide anion radical (O2•−) anti-inflammatory and scavenging effects that facilitate psoriasis treatment [88]. A significant level of carotenoids was observed in Tychonema sp. LEGE 07175 and Cyanobium sp. LEGE 07175. The extracts revealed a strong antiaging result by hindering hyaluronidase synthesis, the enzyme that promotes hyaluronic acid depolymerization [89]. Antimicrobial sesterterpene from a Scytonema sp. (UTEX 1163) culture demonstrated growth inhibition against several pathogenic microbes such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Bacillus anthracis, Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli [89,90].

3. Biotechnological Applications of Cyanobacteria

Cyanobacteria are remarkably the most crucial group of microbes in the universe as they satisfy important environmental roles in the universe, as an important global supplier of oxygen, nitrogen and carbon [91]. Owing to their enormous array of industrial applications, they have been the subject of quite a lot of research. They are important sources of biofertilizers, biofuels, food additives and coloring dyes [92]. Cyanobacteria are used in water treatments, bioplastics production, cosmetics, forestry, feed for animals, production of hydrogen, bioethanol production and biogas production [93,94,95,96,97,98,99]. Here, we review the highly demanded applications of cyanobacteria in biotechnology.

3.1. Cyanobacteria as Food Supplements

Cyanobacterial carotenoids including zeaxanthin, beta-carotene, canthaxanthin and nostoxanthin are great sources used in food supplements, colorants, food additives and animal feed. The productions of these metabolites are on the rise. The supplements are sold in the form of tablets, granules and capsules. As an example, β-carotene, riboflavin, vitamin B12 and thiamine are greatly used supplements generated by cyanobacteria such as Spirulina [60,66]. In addition, cyanobacteria are known to be used as whole food or as dietary supplements such as minerals, amino acids, proteins, complex sugar, carbohydrate, phycocyanin, active enzymes, essential fatty acids and chlorophyll [100].
Arthrospira platensis (a filamentous, gram-negative cyanobacterium) is frequently used as a whole food supplement. It is grown globally and applied as an animal feed supplement in aquariums, poultry, aquariums and many agricultural industries worldwide. Dried Spirulina contains 8% fat, 5% water, 51–71% protein and 24% carbohydrate. It is a valuable supplier of several important nutrients and nutritional minerals, including iron and vitamin B12. Vitamin B12 is important in the production of hemoglobin, maintains the nervous system and participates in DNA synthesis [101,102]. Previous research revealed that several nutritional supplements of cyanobacterial origin such as Spirulina, chlorella and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae are readily available in the consumer markets in the United States [103].
Several dietary supplements are frequently generated from the biomass of cyanobacterial species and eaten whole, unlike extracts utilized in pharmaceutical productions [103]. For example, ketocarotenoid (astaxanthin) is seen as a powerful antioxidant compared to vitamin A and vitamin C as well as several carotenoids which perform a crucial role in preventing destruction in human cells via photooxidation. Haematococcus pluvialis has been known to generate astaxanthin, which is a strong inhibitor of protease known for the treatment of several diseases including the human immunodeficiency virus disease (the virus that is responsible for the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) which is the final stage of HIV disease) [34,104,105].

3.2. Cyanobacteria in Medical and Pharmaceutical Biotechnology

Cyanobacteria is comprise of several secondary metabolites that are useful in the field of medical biotechnology. These microbes have achieved tremendous attention from researchers because of the generation of bioactive compounds that are incredibly useful in medical settings [106]. Although they generate effective toxins, they also generate various metabolites that are vital in terms of their anticancer, antibiotic, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressant and antimicrobial effects [106,107,108,109,110]. Several global investigations have explored various bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria as anticancer potentials. For instance, Aurilide (isolated from Dolabella auricularia) revealed varying cytotoxicity from picomolar (pM) in nanomolar (nM) concentrations against numerous cancer cell lines. Aurilide aids mitochondrial-induced apoptosis by selectively binding to prohibitin 1 (PHB1) in the mitochondria and triggering the proteolytic dispensation of optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) [111,112]. Biselyngbyaside is another drug obtained from Lyngbya sp. Biselyngbyaside A shows cytotoxicity against HeLa S3 cells with an IC50 value of 0.1 μg/mL. However, Biselyngbyolide B, C, E and F have an antiproliferative impact in HeLa and HL-60 cells, whereas Biselyngbyolide C prompts endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and apoptosis in HeLa cells [113,114]. In addition, cryptophycin isolated from Nostoc sp. var. ATCC 53789 and GSV 224 is an excellent anticancer agent. Cryptophycin prevents microtubule formation and demonstrates anti-tumorigenic action against various solid tumors implanted in mice involving multidrug-resistant cancer cells. The IC50 value of cryptophycin was found to be lower than 50 pM for cell lines multidrug-resistant cancer [115]. In recent studies on cancer therapy, cryptophycin copulated with peptides and antibodies had been developed for targeted drug delivery [116]. The antiproliferative actions of Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD)–cryptophycin and isoAsp−Gly−Arg (isoDGR)-cryptophycin conjugates were experimented against human melanoma cell lines (M21 and M21-L). The investigation revealed that the conjugations exhibit anticancer efficacy at nanomolar concentrations with diverse expression integrin αvβ3 (a type of integrin that is a receptor for vitronectin) levels [116,117].
Apratoxin and its derivatives, developed from several types of marine cyanobacteria (such as Moorea producens strain (RS05), Lyngbya bouillonii, L. sordida, L. majuscula, genera Phormidium, and genera Neolyngbya), are known to combat diverse forms of cancer cell lines [106,118,119]. Curacin A islolated from Lyngbya majuscula is effective against cancer of the breast [120]. Consequently, in addition to the natural resources, cyanobacteria provide a favorable means, presenting a comprehensive variety of substances for new drug discovery and development [121]. Secondary metabolites of cyanobacteria can be applied as natural compositions in cosmetology [122]. For instance, they can be used as photoprotective Mycosporine-like Amino Acids (MAAs) in sunscreens to shield the skin from destructive UVR. In addition, cyanobacteria natural pigments such as phycobiliproteins and carotenoids may be employed as natural colorants as well as antioxidants to shield the skin from destruction resulting from exposure to UV irradiation [123]. Therefore, the field of cyanobacteria exploration is very crucial research.

3.3. Cyanobacteria in Bioplastic and Biofuel Production

Cyanobacteria features such remarkable approaches for fixation and absorption of atmospheric nitrogen and CO2, and employing them it for growth in unfavorable climatic environments, such as unfertile soils and saline waters, make them extremely suitable for production of biodegradable plastics and biofuels [124]. Although numerous means are available for bioplastic and biofuel production, cyanobacteria have been studied as energy-rich suppliers due to the triacylglycerol (TAG) and diacylglycerol (DAG) production, which can be employed as biodiesel precursors [125]. Cyanobacteria such as Synechocystis, Spirulina, Anabaena and Nostoc muscorum can function as bio-factories for biofuel and bioplastic generation. For instance, they have the metabolism for generating cost-effective and sustainable biopolymer polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), among other copolymers [34]. Biopolymeric PHB presents material features such as polypropylene, a standard plastic obtained from petroleum (fossil fuels). However, in comparison to standard plastics, PHB is biodegradable, and its application as a complementary of standard plastics can assist in alleviating the critical ecological influences of fossil fuels and plastics in nonbiodegradable overconsumption [126,127].
Species of cyanobacteria such as Synechococcus and Synechocystis species can generate lactate and succinate which are important chemicals in the production of bioplastics. Succinate is an essential biotechnological chemical, a precursor of adipic acid, 1,4-butanediol, and other four-carbon chemicals [128]. In recent study by Durall et al. [128], the highest succinate titer was achieved in dark incubation (compared to the light and anoxic darkness conditions) of an engineered cyanobacteria strain (Synechocystis PCC 6803), coupled with a limited glyoxylate shunt (aceA and aceB) overexpressing isocitrate lyase with phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, with supplemented medium using 2-thenoyltrifluoroacetone [128]. Furthermore, a research team at Kobe University [129] illustrated the method by which Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (one of the most global researched cyanobacterial strains known to be the model microbe for photosynthate production because of its fast growth and the ease of genetic manipulation) could generate D-lactate (utilized in biodegradable plastic productions). The research team demonstrated that malic enzyme accelerates the production of D-lactate via genetically modifying D-lactate synthesis pathways using cyanobacteria. They eventually succeeded in producing the world’s maximum amount of D-lactate (26.6 g/L) directly from light and carbon dioxide [129,130].
The process of generating petroleum products (such as jet fuel, heating oil, propane, gasoline, and diesel) could be a serious potential environmental threat (pollution), and the release of toxic substances such as greenhouse gasses (methane, ozone, carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide) into the atmosphere could be hazardous to humans, plants and animals [131,132]. Cyanobacteria provide excellent assurance as suppliers of renewable biofuels for the energy sector [133]. Biofuels such as 2-methyl-1-butanol, isobutanol, 2,3-butanediol ethanol, isobutanol and ethylene have been produced from engineered cyanobacteria (Synechocystis sp.) [134]. Biofuels including gasoline, jet fuel, biodiesel and ethanol are being generated from genetically modified cyanobacteria by some US-based companies such as Joule Unlimited and Algenol [15,135,136,137].

3.4. Cyanobacteria in Bioremediation

Cyanobacteria are characterized by high adaptability to various stress conditions, being at the same time quite resistant to toxic compounds of different origins [31]. Therefore, such photosynthetic bacteria seem to be relevant for numerous approaches in the field of bioremediation, including soil remediation, wastewater treatment and degradation of organic pollutants. Water pollution represents a real environmental problem as a consequence of anthropogenic activity both in the context of urbanization and industrialization of the environment as well agricultural practices. Several research groups have successfully explored the potential application of cyanobacteria for wastewater treatment, demonstrating that polluted water from different sources can be treated effectively with the help of such microorganisms, and the system based on photosynthetic procaryotic cells can be considered as a promising alternative to conventional biological processes such as activated sludge.
Extensive aquaculture generates a huge amount of polluted nitrogen-rich water released into the costal seas, directly improving the nitrogen pool in marine ecosystems, altering the balance of species [138]. The marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. has been shown to effectively remove ammonium from brackish aquaculture wastewater [139]. The tested microorganism assimilated ammonium through the actions of glutamine synthetase (GS, EC 6.3.1.2) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT, EC 1.4.1.13) cooperated in the GS-GOGAT cycle, which is closely related to the adaptive strategy of the Synechococcus species to changing nutrient conditions [140].
An interesting approach to biological wastewater treatment is the use of a cyanobacterial-bacterial consortium that operates on the synergistic action between photosynthetic microorganisms and heterotrophic bacteria. It should be stressed that such photosynthetic microbes are known from exopolysaccharides production that are useful in establishing a symbiotic association of cyanobacteria with other organisms [141]. Brewery wastewater containing high concentrations of organic pollutants and significant amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus has been treated using a cyanobacterial-bacterial consortium dominated by the filamentous cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya sp. [142] Cyanobacterial-bacterial aggregates grown under optimal pH and temperature conditions were found to be highly effective and successfully reduced the levels of nitrogenous compounds, including nitrate (up to 80%), ammonium (up to 90%) and phosphorus compounds (up to 70%) in crude wastewater. The introduction of an additional wastewater pretreatment step involving electrocoagulation followed by the use of an electrochemically treated supernatant as a medium for the cultivation of microorganisms increased the level of removal of pollutants [143]. The bioremediation potential of the studied consortium was successfully verified under stressed conditions in a flat-plate photobioreactor filled with hydrophilic support [144]. The proposed solution is very important from a technological point of view as it brings laboratory ideas closer to the practical disposal of brewery wastewater. Other examples illustrating the applicability of bacterial consortia for wastewater treatment are as follows: Dinophysis acuminata and Dinophysis caudata living in a consortium were reported to effectively remove phosphate, phenol and cyanide from coke-oven wastewater [145], the effective mixing of nitrogen-fixing soil cyanobacterial culture was municipal wastewater treatment [146] and mixed cyanobacteria formed mats degraded pesticide lindane in pesticide-contaminated effluents, showing high resistance against its toxicity [147].
The most important demonstration of the degradation potential of cyanobacterial cells is their ability to remove heavy metals from sewage of various origins. The ability of cyanobacteria to tolerate and interact with metal ions makes them an attractive tool for environmental biotechnology [148]. Cyanobacteria employ a variety of mechanisms such as biosorption, bioaccumulation, activation of metal transporters, biotransformation, and induction of detoxifying enzymes to sequester and minimize the toxic effects of heavy metals [149]. Hexavalent chromium can be present in some aquatic systems as a result of textile, paint, metal cleaning, plating, electroplating, and mining industries [150]. As chromium (Cr(VI)) is potentially toxic and carcinogenic to humans, its removal from water and wastewater is required to avoid serious health and environmental problems. The living cyanobacterial consortium consisting of Limnococcus limneticus and Leptolyngbya subtilis has been found to be efficient in the removal of Cr (VI) from wastewater [151], whereas the mat-forming cyanobacterial consortium consisting of Chlorella sp., Phormidium sp. and Oscillatoria sp. efficiently removed hexavalent chromium from the sewage in the tannery industry [152]. It is worth noting that cultivation of microbes under conditions that force cells to organize themselves into a mat or application of naturally forming mats can be applied on a large scale and used practically in bioremediation. Cadmium is a toxic metal and its exposure remains a global concern [153]. An interesting strategy for the sequestration of Cd (II) from aqueous solutions was proposed, including axenic cultures of Nostoc muscorum immobilized on the glass surface through the formation of biofilms [154]. A microorganism growing as a biofilm expressed the ability to adsorb Cd(II) in a wide concentration range of ~24 ppb to 100 ppm and a pH range of 5 to 9. Strains belonging to Nostoc genera that produce EPS are known for their ability to remove metals, and the application of mixotrophic cultivation conditions increased the uptake capacity of heavy metal ions by the Nostoc species [155]. The self-flocculating Oscillatoria sp. was shown to possess metabolic properties to eliminate Cd from metal-contaminated water [156]. Authors analyzed the mechanism of bacterial activity against Cd and they found that metal adsorption by negatively charged functional groups in cyanobacterial biomasses was the major mechanism used by Oscillatoria sp. to remove metals from the aqueous medium followed by Cd bioaccumulation in living cells. The potential in municipal sewage remediation has also been shown for Anabaena oryzae, characterized by a high removal efficiency for cadmium, lead, zinc, iron, copper and manganese [157].
Cyanobacteria are present very often in polluted environments [158], and due to their naturally evolved resistance and selectivity against environmental pollutants, they exude a significant metabolic potential for xenobiotic degradation. For example, Spirulina spp. demonstrated the ability to metabolize the phosphonate xenobiotic Dequest 2054® [159], Leptolyngbya sp. has the ability to degrade phenol, significantly decreasing its concentration in the cultivation medium [160], Aphanothece conferta demonstrated high degradation efficiency against aliphatic hydrocarbons, whereas aromatic hydrocarbons were degraded by Synechocystis aquatilis [161]; cyanobacteria have also been reported to have the relevant enzymatic system to participate in the degradation of textile dyes [162,163].

3.5. Applications of Cyanobacteria Species in Biocatalytic Processes

Cyanobacteria, as organisms capable of photosynthesis, are a group of biocatalysts with unusual activities that can find application in biocatalytic processes for obtaining crucial derivatives used in various industries. One of the derivatives with extensive use in the pharmaceutical and fragrance industry are unsaturated alcohols, e.g., cinnamyl alcohol, essential both for the synthesis of Taxol and Chloramycin and for the production of aromatic compounds [164,165]. Traditionally, this compound is obtained from cinnamaldehyde of natural origin, but the chemical reduction of the aldehyde group to a primary hydroxyl group with the double bond intact is problematic, so a mixture of products (Scheme 1) is usually obtained. The solution to this problem may be the use of selected cyanobacterial strains that can chemoselectively reduce aldehyde to alcohol without breaking the double bond in the side chain [165].
Yamanaka et al. [165] have selected the strain Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as the most efficient, capable of converting cinnamaldehyde to cinnamyl alcohol with an efficiency of up to 98%. In addition, they demonstrated that the reaction is strictly light-dependent, and the coenzymes (NADPH) needed for reduction are regenerated in photosynthetic electron transfer reactions; thus, there is no need for additional supporting substrates, which greatly simplifies the whole process.
Another group of compounds of industrial importance are optically pure secondary alcohols used as chiral building blocks for the synthesis of optically active products. The whole cell biocatalytic reduction of the corresponding ketones is a favorable alternative to traditional chemical processes. Acetophenone is often used as a model substrate for screening in case of bioreduction and it can undergo enantioselective bioreduction to R- or S-phenyl ethanol (1, Scheme 2). Several methods have been developed using whole cells of heterotrophic microorganisms or plant tissues [166,167,168], but typically these processes require co-substrates to support coenzyme regeneration systems. The intracellular oxidoreductase that is responsible for the asymmetric acetophenone reduction reaction is not itself dependent on light but requires the presence of reduced NAD(P)H, which is one of the products of the light phase of photosynthesis (Scheme 2). Lighting is therefore essential for the regeneration of the cofactor. According to the literature data, cyanobacterial enzymatic systems could be effectively applied for the reduction of acetophenone to S- phenyl ethanol (e.g., Spirulina platensis–45% yield, 97% e.e [169]; Arthrospira maxima- 45,8% yield, 98,8% e.e. [170]; however, the efficiency and enantioselectivity of processes are dependent on the growth rate of biocatalysts, substrate concentration and light regime [169,170].
Similar relationships have been observed in the reduction of diethyl 2-oxophosphonates to corresponding S-2-hydroxyalkylphosphonates (Scheme 2), which in an optically pure form can also be used as a synthon for the synthesis of derivatives used in medicine to agriculture [171,172,173]. The biological activity of phosphonates is based, among other things, on enzyme inhibition and therefore they are difficult substrates for biocatalytic processes, especially in the scaling-up context. Additionally, phosphonates with a carbonyl group that is located right next to the aromatic ring were inefficiently transformed by fungal biocatalysts [174,175]; therefore, special attention was turned to the strain of Nodularia sphaerocarpa capable of reducing the substrate (3) (Scheme 2), with a yield of 99% and an enantiomeric excess of 93%. As in the case of acetophenone, the efficiency of the reaction was closely correlated with the concentration of the substrate used and the best results were obtained using 1 mM of diethyl 2-oxo-2-phenylethylphosphonate (3) [176]. Other substrates tested in the discussed study were not reduced very effectively (diethyl 2-oxopropylphosphonate (2)—transformed with Arthrospira maxima with 20% yield and 99% e.e, diethyl 2-oxobutylphosphonate (3)—transformed with Nodularia sphaerocarpa with 27% yield and 80% e.e.) [176]. In the next stage of the research mentioned above, immobilization in calcium alginate was used to increase the resistance of the biocatalyst to the toxic effects of substrates, and the influence of shaking (better contact of the substrate with the biocatalyst) on the reduction efficiency was checked. Also, in this case Nodularia sphaerocarpa turned out to be the most effective strain. The use of mixing or immobilization made it possible to increase the scale of the process. Packing the immobilized photobiocatalyst in a simplified flow reactor allowed for increasing the substrate (3) (2-oxo-2-phenylethylphosphonate) concentration to the value of 10 mM, although in the 500 mL batch culture conducted with stirring, a better efficiency (44% of yield, 91% of e.e.) was obtained compared to 38% of the yield and 86% of e.e. obtained in the column reactor [177].
A quite recent finding was that NAD(P)H or flavin-dependent enzymes involved in many light-independent metabolic processes may have unnatural activities after exposure to light. Cofactors of these enzymes can form electron-donor-acceptor (EDA) complexes with unnatural substrates (Scheme 2). EDA can be excited by visible light which allows for the flow of electrons and consequently the formation of the reduced product [178]. The first enzyme of this type to be described was NADPH-dependent carbonyl ketoreductase, which catalyzed the radical dehalogenation of halolactone upon exposure to light [179]. Later, in a similar manner, asymmetric reductive cyclization [180,181], intermolecular hydroalkylation [178] or asymmetric hydrogenation [182] using ene-reductase was achieved.
Another meaningful application of cyanobacteria is related to the activity of the fatty acid photodecarboxylase (FAP) of microalgae Chlorella variabilis origin. This enzyme is inside the cell, and is involved in the lipids metabolism and driven by blue light and the presence of FAD. This mechanism was deeply analysed and described by Damine Sourigue et al. [183]. Scientists studied the microalgal strain Chlorella variabilis NC64A and discovered that phototrophs produced by photodecarboxylase belong to the oxidoreductases and catalyses decarboxylation of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, with the releasing of the corresponding alkanes or alkenes. This enzyme interacts with substrates by binding them in a tunnel-like site, which leads directly to the flavin dinucleotide, which is crucial as a moiety sensitive to light excitement, which is followed by the electron transfer from the substrate. Such a sequence initiates the reaction. This discovery has not gone unnoticed by researchers involved in the application of biocatalysts of different origins for the synthesis of variable chemical compounds according to green chemistry rules. Photodecarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis NC64A (Cv FAP) was considered a part of the cascade of reactions finally leading to biofuel production. The very first approaches were focused on the evaluation of the activity of the enzyme (Cv FAP) towards structurally different fatty acids (saturated and unsaturated) [184,185]. Usually, reactions were carried out at pH 8.5 under illuminations by blue light of intensity = 13.7 μEL−1:s−1 and the proportions of the substrate and enzyme were as follows: [substrate] = 30 mM, [decarboxylase] = 6.0 μM. According to the general scheme (Scheme 3) below, a number of fatty acids were tested: lauric, myristic, palmitic, margaric, stearic, oleic, linoleic and arachidic.
The best conversion degrees were obtained for the four substrates: palmitic, margaric, stearic and arachidic acids (above 90%). The differences in the results were correlated to the differences in the substrates biding, which in turn is due to differences in matching between the tunnel site in enzyme structures and the substrate moiety. However, further experiments were meant for the scaling of the selected reactions and applying the palmitic acid as a starting compound; this approach succeeds and leads to the scale elevation up to 155 mg of pentadecane production. These results were important in relation to the necessity of green chemistry solution implementations in the chemical industry. The practical side of the mentioned results appeared in the cascade of the reactions, starting from triglycerides hydrolysis via decarboxylation and leading to the release of glycerol, hydrocarbon and carbon dioxide (Scheme 4) [184,185,186]. Previous approaches were based on the two-step process design as a sequence starting from the hydrolysis conducted by the lipase from Candida rugosa, which delivers fatty acids for the next reaction catalysed by photocarboxylase (Scheme 4).
Further developed protocols were performed as one-step ones. In addition, the mode of the biocatalysts applied for photodecarboxylations was modified. Instead of using the purified enzyme, whole-cell biocatalysts were involved in the reaction. Genetically engineered cells of E. coli were able to produce photodecarboxylase at ae high level and with great activity towards studied substrates, which is why for the next set of experiments such a biocatalyst was applied. The limiting factor was finding a compatible reaction–environment lipase, which is at the same time insensitive to blue light, which is essential for decarboxylase activity. These boundary conditions were met by immobilized lipase from the fungus Rhizopus oryzae [186] and finally the one pot sequence of reactions was set. The effectiveness of this protocol was checked against plants oils (e.g., soybean oil) and waste cooking oil and for different physical chemical parameters (e.g., temperature, biocatalysts and substrates concentrations, reaction duration). This allowed for selecting the best protocol for scaling (from 1 mL to 15 mL of the final volume of reaction mixture), which was conducted with soybean oil with the receiving of almost 1 g of hydrocarbon (21.2% of isolated yield).
The above achievements are the base for further discoveries as they proved the practical and biotechnological function of photobiocatalysts; nevertheless, it should be emphasized that they require the individual protocols for almost every designed biocatalytic process.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspective

This review has highlighted that cyanobacteria are promising sources of several primary and secondary metabolites that are known for their biological activities. These bioactive compounds were reviewed to possess several impacts in various biotechnological industries. Nonetheless, to improve the usefulness of cyanobacteria for human and animals exploitation, extensive research is essential for profiling cyanobacterial secondary metabolites, known to be generally employed in different countries in the areas of nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals applications, including in antimicrobial and antitumor activities. Furthermore, cyanobacterial enzymatic systems are currently applied as biocatalysts for conducting chemically different reactions to achieve various synthetic goals. This field is still not fully explored and offers biological tools of different features compared with light independent organisms (e.g., fungi and heterotrophic bacteria). There is a need for further research on how to effectively exploit cyanobacteria using green technological advancements as well as efficient insights on cyanobacteria applications on larger scales. Future investigation that is also promising is essential to explore more beneficial roles of cyanobacteria in biotechnology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.Ż.-D., Data source preparation, E.Ż.-D., S.O.S., M.B.-R., M.K.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a subsidy from the Ministry of Education and Science for 471 the Faculty of Chemistry of Wrocław University of Science and Technology (subsidy nr: 472 8211104160).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Study does not report any data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huisman, J.; Codd, G.A.; Paerl, H.W.; Ibelings, B.W.; Verspagen, J.M.H.; Visser, P.M. Cyanobacterial Blooms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stomp, M.; Huisman, J.; Vörös, L.; Pick, F.R.; Laamanen, M.; Haverkamp, T.; Stal, L.J. Colourful Coexistence of Red and Green Picocyanobacteria in Lakes and Seas. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Whitton, B.A.; Potts, M. Introduction to the Cyanobacteria. In Ecology of Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and Time; Whitton, B.A., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2012; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rasmussen, B.; Fletcher, I.R.; Brocks, J.J.; Kilburn, M.R. Reassessing the First Appearance of Eukaryotes and Cyanobacteria. Nature 2008, 455, 1101–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Catherine, Q.; Susanna, W.; Isidora, E.S.; Mark, H.; Aurélie, V.; Jean-François, H. A Review of Current Knowledge on Toxic Benthic Freshwater Cyanobacteria--Ecology, Toxin Production and Risk Management. Water Res. 2013, 47, 5464–5479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xiao, M.; Li, M.; Reynolds, C.S. Colony Formation in the Cyanobacterium Microcystis. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2018, 93, 1399–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Amadu, A.A.; de Graft-Johnson, K.A.A.; Ameka, G.K. Industrial Applications of Cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria Recent Adv. Taxon. Appl. 2021, 106, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Costa, J.A.V.; Moreira, J.B.; Lucas, B.F.; Da Silva Braga, V.; Cassuriaga, A.P.A.; De Morais, M.G. Recent Advances and Future Perspectives of PHB Production by Cyanobacteria. Ind. Biotechnol. 2018, 14, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sukenik, A.; Hadas, O.; Kaplan, A.; Quesada, A. Invasion of Nostocales (Cyanobacteria) to Subtropical and Temperate Freshwater Lakes—Physiological, Regional, and Global Driving Forces. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Paerl, H.W.; Paul, V.J. Climate Change: Links to Global Expansion of Harmful Cyanobacteria. Water Res. 2012, 46, 1349–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berg, M.; Sutula, M. Factors Affecting Growth of Cyanobacteria With Special Emphasis on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. South. Calif. Coast. Water Res. Proj. Tech. Rep. 2015, 869, 100. [Google Scholar]
  12. Koller, M. Advances in Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production, Volume 3. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Afreen, R.; Tyagi, S.; Singh, G.P.; Singh, M. Challenges and Perspectives of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production From Microalgae/Cyanobacteria and Bacteria as Microbial Factories: An Assessment of Hybrid Biological System. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kurmayer, R.; Deng, L.; Entfellner, E. Role of Toxic and Bioactive Secondary Metabolites in Colonization and Bloom Formation by Filamentous Cyanobacteria Planktothrix. Harmful Algae 2016, 54, 69–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mazard, S.; Penesyan, A.; Ostrowski, M.; Paulsen, I.T.; Egan, S. Tiny Microbes with a Big Impact: The Role of Cyanobacteria and Their Metabolites in Shaping Our Future. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ng, H.-S.; Chew, L.-L. Valuable Compounds Produced by Microalgae. Handb. Biorefinery Res. Technol. 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Orona-Navar, A.; Aguilar-Hernández, I.; Nigam, K.D.P.; Cerdán-Pasarán, A.; Ornelas-Soto, N. Alternative Sources of Natural Pigments for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Algae, Cyanobacteria, Bacteria, Archaea and Fungi. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 332, 29–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chittora, D.; Meena, M.; Barupal, T.; Swapnil, P. Cyanobacteria as a Source of Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2020, 22, 100737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nicoletti, M. The Nutraceutical Potential of Cyanobacteria. Pharmacol. Potential Cyanobacteria 2022, 287–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Agarwal, P.; Soni, R.; Kaur, P.; Madan, A.; Mishra, R.; Pandey, J.; Singh, S.; Singh, G. Cyanobacteria as a Promising Alternative for Sustainable Environment: Synthesis of Biofuel and Biodegradable Plastics. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 939347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Böttger, A.; Vothknecht, U.; Bolle, C.; Wolf, A. Plant Secondary Metabolites and Their General Function in Plants. In Lessons on Caffeine, Cannabis & Co; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 3–17. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chomel, M.; Guittonny-Larchevêque, M.; Fernandez, C.; Gallet, C.; DesRochers, A.; Paré, D.; Jackson, B.G.; Baldy, V. Plant Secondary Metabolites: A Key Driver of Litter Decomposition and Soil Nutrient Cycling. J. Ecol. 2016, 104, 1527–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Baselga-Cervera, B.; Balboa, C.G.; Costas, E.; Lopez-Rodas, V. Why Cyanobacteria Produce Toxins? Evolutionary Game Theory Suggests the Key. Int. J. Biol. 2014, 7, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Singh, D.P.; Prabha, R.; Verma, S.; Meena, K.K.; Yandigeri, M. Antioxidant Properties and Polyphenolic Content in Terrestrial Cyanobacteria. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Formighieri, C.; Melis, A. Cyanobacterial Production of Plant Essential Oils. Planta 2018, 248, 933–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Knoot, C.J.; Khatri, Y.; Hohlman, R.M.; Sherman, D.H.; Pakrasi, H.B. Engineered Production of Hapalindole Alkaloids in the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. UTEX 2973. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019, 8, 1941–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Khalifa, S.A.M.; Shedid, E.S.; Saied, E.M.; Jassbi, A.R.; Jamebozorgi, F.H.; Rateb, M.E.; Du, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Kai, G.Y.; Al-Hammady, M.A.M.; et al. Cyanobacteria—From the Oceans to the Potential Biotechnological and Biomedical Applications. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, Q.; Dong, R.; Xing, X.; Li, Y. A new antibiotic produced by the cyanobacterium-symbiotic fungus Simplicillium lanosoniveum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2018, 32, 1348–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sunday, O.S.; Emmanuel, E.; Cornelius, A.O. In-Vitro Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Crude Methanolic and Aqueous Extracts of Mitracarpus Villosus. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 15, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zahra, Z.; Choo, D.H.; Lee, H.; Parveen, A. Cyanobacteria: Review of Current Potentials and Applications. Environments 2020, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rachedi, R.; Foglino, M.; Latifi, A. Stress Signaling in Cyanobacteria: A Mechanistic Overview. Life 2020, 10, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, B.; Wan, C.; Mehmood, M.A.; Chang, J.S.; Bai, F.; Zhao, X. Manipulating Environmental Stresses and Stress Tolerance of Microalgae for Enhanced Production of Lipids and Value-Added Products—A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 1198–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ge, S.; Champagne, P.; Plaxton, W.C.; Leite, G.B.; Marazzi, F. Microalgal Cultivation with Waste Streams and Metabolic Constraints to Triacylglycerides Accumulation for Biofuel Production. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2017, 11, 325–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singh, R.; Parihar, P.; Singh, M.; Bajguz, A.; Kumar, J.; Singh, S.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Uncovering Potential Applications of Cyanobacteria and Algal Metabolites in Biology, Agriculture and Medicine: Current Status and Future Prospects. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 515. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. El-Baz, F.K.; El-Senousy, W.M.; El-Sayed, A.B.; Kamel, M.M. In vitro antiviral and antimicrobial activities of algal extract of Spirulina platensis. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 3, 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  36. Vatansever, F.; de Melo, W.C.M.A.; Avci, P.; Vecchio, D.; Sadasivam, M.; Gupta, A.; Chandran, R.; Karimi, M.; Parizotto, N.A.; Yin, R.; et al. Antimicrobial Strategies Centered around Reactive Oxygen Species–Bactericidal Antibiotics, Photodynamic Therapy and Beyond. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Rastogi, R.P.; Sinha, R.P.; Moh, S.H.; Lee, T.K.; Kottuparambil, S.; Kim, Y.J.; Rhee, J.S.; Choi, E.M.; Brown, M.T.; Häder, D.P.; et al. Ultraviolet Radiation and Cyanobacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2014, 141, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mahfooz, S.; Shamim, A.; Husain, A.; Hasan, Z.; Farooqui, A. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Cyanobacteria Exposed to Heavy Metals. Contam. Water Health Risk Assess. Treat. Strateg. 2021, 385–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Badri, H.; Monsieurs, P.; Coninx, I.; Wattiez, R.; Leys, N. Molecular investigation of the radiation resistance of edible cyanobacterium Arthrospira sp. PCC 8005. Microbiologyopen 2015, 4, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Singh, D.P.; Prabha, R.; Meena, K.K.; Sharma, L.; Sharma, A.K.; Singh, D.P.; Prabha, R.; Meena, K.K.; Sharma, L.; Sharma, A.K. Induced Accumulation of Polyphenolics and Flavonoids in Cyanobacteria under Salt Stress Protects Organisms through Enhanced Antioxidant Activity. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Patipong, T.; Hibino, T.; Waditee-Sirisattha, R.; Kageyama, H. Induction of Antioxidative Activity and Antioxidant Molecules in the Halotolerant Cyanobacterium Halothece sp. PCC7418 by Temperature Shift. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14, 1934578X19865680. [Google Scholar]
  42. Park, H.J.; Cho, J.H.; Hong, S.H.; Kim, D.H.; Jung, H.Y.; Kang, I.K.; Cho, Y.J. Whitening and Anti-Wrinkle Activities of Ferulic Acid Isolated from Tetragonia Tetragonioides in B16F10 Melanoma and CCD-986sk Fibroblast Cells. J. Nat. Med. 2018, 72, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Monteiro e Silva, S.A.; Calixto, G.M.F.; Cajado, J.; de Carvalho, P.C.A.; Rodero, C.F.; Chorilli, M.; Leonardi, G.R. Gallic Acid-Loaded Gel Formulation Combats Skin Oxidative Stress: Development, Characterization and Ex Vivo Biological Assays. Polymers 2017, 9, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Sun, S.; Kee, H.J.; Ryu, Y.; Choi, S.Y.; Kim, G.R.; Kim, H.S.; Kee, S.J.; Jeong, M.H. Gentisic Acid Prevents the Transition from Pressure Overload-Induced Cardiac Hypertrophy to Heart Failure. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Frazzini, S.; Scaglia, E.; Dell’anno, M.; Reggi, S.; Panseri, S.; Giromini, C.; Lanzoni, D.; Rossi, C.A.S.; Rossi, L. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Algal and Cyanobacterial Extracts: An In Vitro Study. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Monroe, M.B.B.; Easley, A.D.; Grant, K.; Fletcher, G.K.; Boyer, C.; Maitland, D.J. Multifunctional Shape-Memory Polymer Foams with Bio-Inspired Antimicrobials. ChemPhysChem 2018, 19, 1999–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, R.; Narita, R.; Nishimura, H.; Marumoto, S.; Yamamoto, S.P.; Ouda, R.; Yatagai, M.; Fujita, T.; Watanabe, T. Antiviral Activity of Phenolic Derivatives in Pyroligneous Acid from Hardwood, Softwood, and Bamboo. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Del Mondo, A.; Smerilli, A.; Sané, E.; Sansone, C.; Brunet, C. Challenging microalgal vitamins for human health. Microb Cell Fact. 2020, 19, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Helliwell, K.E.; Lawrence, A.D.; Holzer, A.; Kudahl, U.J.; Sasso, S.; Kräutler, B.; Scanlan, D.J.; Warren, M.J.; Smith, A.G. Cyanobacteria and Eukaryotic Algae Use Different Chemical Variants of Vitamin B12. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 999–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Asensi-Fabado, M.A.; Munné-Bosch, S. Vitamins in Plants: Occurrence, Biosynthesis and Antioxidant Function. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Youness, R.A.; Dawoud, A.; ElTahtawy, O.; Farag, M.A. Fat-souluble vitamins: Updated review of their role and orchestration in human nutrition throughout life cycle with sex differences. Nutr. Metab. 2022, 19, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Golriz, F.; Donnelly, L.F.; Devaraj, S.; Krishnamurthy, R. Modern American Scurvy—Experience with Vitamin C Deficiency at a Large Children’s Hospital. Pediatr. Radiol. 2017, 47, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fenech, M.; Amaya, I.; Valpuesta, V.; Botella, M.A. Vitamin C Content in Fruits: Biosynthesis and Regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Al Saleh, Y.; Beshyah, S.A.; Hussein, W.; Almadani, A.; Hassoun, A.; Al Mamari, A.; Ba-Essa, E.; Al-Dhafiri, E.; Hassanein, M.; Fouda, M.A.; et al. Diagnosis and Management of Vitamin D Deficiency in the Gulf Cooperative Council (GCC) Countries: An Expert Consensus Summary Statement from the GCC Vitamin D Advisory Board. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020, 15, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Merchant, R.E.; Phillips, T.W.; Udani, J. Nutritional Supplementation with Chlorella Pyrenoidosa Lowers Serum Methylmalonic Acid in Vegans and Vegetarians with a Suspected Vitamin B12 Deficiency. J. Med. Food 2015, 18, 1357–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Grosshagauer, S.; Kraemer, K.; Somoza, V. The True Value of Spirulina. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 4109–4115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Watanabe, F.; Katsura, H.; Takenaka, S.; Fujita, T.; Abe, K.; Tamura, Y.; Nakatsuka, T.; Nakano, Y. Pseudovitamin B12 Is the Predominant Cobamide of an Algal Health Food, Spirulina Tablets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4736–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Agostoni, C.; Canani, R.B.; Fairweather-Tait, S.; Heinonen, M.; Korhonen, H.; La Vieille, S.; Marchelli, R.; Martin, A.; Naska, A.; Neuhäuser-Berthold, M.; et al. Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for Cobalamin (Vitamin B12). EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4150. [Google Scholar]
  59. Muys, M.; Sui, Y.; Schwaiger, B.; Lesueur, C.; Vandenheuvel, D.; Vermeir, P.; Vlaeminck, S.E. High Variability in Nutritional Value and Safety of Commercially Available Chlorella and Spirulina Biomass Indicates the Need for Smart Production Strategies. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 275, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Anantharajappa, K.; Dharmesh, S.M.; Ravi, S. Gastro-Protective Potentials of Spirulina: Role of Vitamin B12. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ekeuku, S.O.; Chong, P.N.; Chan, H.K.; Mohamed, N.; Froemming, G.R.A.; Okechukwu, P.N. Spirulina Supplementation Improves Bone Structural Strength and Stiffness in Streptozocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2022, 12, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carcea, M.; Sorto, M.; Batello, C.; Narducci, V.; Aguzzi, A.; Azzini, E.; Fantauzzi, P.; Finotti, E.; Gabrielli, P.; Galli, V.; et al. Nutritional Characterization of Traditional and Improved Dihé, Alimentary Blue-Green Algae from the Lake Chad Region in Africa. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Santiago-Morales, I.S.; Trujillo-Valle, L.; Márquez-Rocha, F.J.; Hernández, J.F.L. Tocopherols, Phycocyanin and Superoxide Dismutase from Microalgae: As Potential Food Antioxidants. Appl. Food Biotechnol. 2018, 5, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  64. Aaronson, S.; Dhawale, S.W.; Patni, N.J.; Deangelis, B.; Frank, O.; Baker, H. The Cell Content and Secretion of Water-Soluble Vitamins by Several Freshwater Algae. Arch. Microbiol. 1977, 112, 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ljubic, A.; Jacobsen, C.; Holdt, S.L.; Jakobsen, J. Microalgae Nannochloropsis Oceanica as a Future New Natural Source of Vitamin D3. Food Chem. 2020, 320, 126627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fais, G.; Manca, A.; Bolognesi, F.; Borselli, M.; Concas, A.; Busutti, M.; Broggi, G.; Sanna, P.; Castillo-Aleman, Y.M.; Rivero-Jiménez, R.A.; et al. Wide Range Applications of Spirulina: From Earth to Space Missions. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tarento, T.D.C.; McClure, D.D.; Vasiljevski, E.; Schindeler, A.; Dehghani, F.; Kavanagh, J.M. Microalgae as a Source of Vitamin K1. Algal Res. 2018, 36, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Scheidler, C.M.; Kick, L.M.; Schneider, S. Ribosomal Peptides and Small Proteins on the Rise. ChemBioChem 2019, 20, 1479–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wei, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Z.; Yan, X. Diversity of Gene Clusters for Polyketide and Nonribosomal Peptide Biosynthesis Revealed by Metagenomic Analysis of the Yellow Sea Sediment. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Katz, L.; Baltz, R.H. Natural Product Discovery: Past, Present, and Future. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Welker, M.; Von Döhren, H. Cyanobacterial Peptides—Nature’s Own Combinatorial Biosynthesis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 530–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Maurya, S.K.; Niveshika; Mishra, R. Importance of Bioinformatics in Genome Mining of Cyanobacteria for Production of Bioactive Compounds. Cyanobacteria Basic Sci. Appl. 2019, 477–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, H.; Fewer, D.P.; Holm, L.; Rouhiainen, L.; Sivonen, K. Atlas of Nonribosomal Peptide and Polyketide Biosynthetic Pathways Reveals Common Occurrence of Nonmodular Enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9259–9264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Kehr, J.C.; Picchi, D.G.; Dittmann, E. Natural Product Biosyntheses in Cyanobacteria: A Treasure Trove of Unique Enzymes. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1622–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Li, B.; Sher, D.; Kelly, L.; Shi, Y.; Huang, K.; Knerr, P.J.; Joewono, I.; Rusch, D.; Chisholm, S.W.; Van Der Donk, W.A. Catalytic Promiscuity in the Biosynthesis of Cyclic Peptide Secondary Metabolites in Planktonic Marine Cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10430–10435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Knerr, P.J.; Van Der Donk, W.A. Discovery, Biosynthesis, and Engineering of Lantipeptides. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 479–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Cubillos-Ruiz, A.; Berta-Thompson, J.W.; Becker, J.W.; Van Der Donk, W.A.; Chisholm, S.W. Evolutionary Radiation of Lanthipeptides in Marine Cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E5424–E5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Breitmaier: Terpenes: Importance, General Structure. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Terpenes:+Importance,+general+structure,+and+biosynthesis&author=Breitmaier,+E.&publication_year=2006&journal=Terpenes+Flavors+Fragr.+Pharmaca+Pheromones&volume=1&pages=1–3 (accessed on 22 September 2022).
  79. Kandi, S.; Godishala, V.; Rao, P.; Biomedicine, K.R. Biomedical Significance of Terpenes: An Insight. Citeseer 2015, 3, 8–10. [Google Scholar]
  80. Jahnke, L.L.; Embaye, T.; Hope, J.; Turk, K.A.; van Zuilen, M.; des Marais, D.J.; Farmer, J.D.; Summons, R.E. Lipid Biomarker and Carbon Isotopic Signatures for Stromatolite-Forming, Microbial Mat Communities and Phormidium Cultures from Yellowstone National Park. Geobiology 2004, 2, 31–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Summons, R.E.; Jahnke, L.L.; Hope, J.M.; Logan, G.A. 2-Methylhopanoids as Biomarkers for Cyanobacterial Oxygenic Photosynthesis. Nature 1999, 400, 554–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Agger, S.A.; Lopez-Gallego, F.; Hoye, T.R.; Schmidt-Dannert, C. Identification of Sesquiterpene Synthases from Nostoc Punctiforme PCC 73102 and Nostoc sp. Strain PCC 7120. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 6084–6096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Vítek, P.; Ascaso, C.; Artieda, O.; Casero, M.C.; Wierzchos, J. Discovery of Carotenoid Red-Shift in Endolithic Cyanobacteria from the Atacama Desert. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Boucar, M.C.M.; Shen, L.Q.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Z.C.; Qiu, B.S. UV-B Irradiation Enhances the Production of Unique Mycosporine-like Amino Acids and Carotenoids in the Subaerial Cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. CCNU1. Eur. J. Phycol. 2021, 56, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kusama, Y.; Inoue, S.; Jimbo, H.; Takaichi, S.; Sonoike, K.; Hihara, Y.; Nishiyama, Y. Zeaxanthin and Echinenone Protect the Repair of Photosystem II from Inhibition by Singlet Oxygen in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 906–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Dienst, D.; Wichmann, J.; Mantovani, O.; Rodrigues, J.S.; Lindberg, P. High Density Cultivation for Efficient Sesquiterpenoid Biosynthesis in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Höckelmann, C.; Becher, P.G.; Von Reuß, S.H.; Jüttner, F. Sesquiterpenes of the Geosmin-Producing Cyanobacterium Calothrix PCC 7507 and Their Toxicity to Invertebrates. Z. Fur Naturforsch. Sect. C J. Biosci. 2009, 64, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Lopes, G.; Clarinha, D.; Vasconcelos, V. Carotenoids from Cyanobacteria: A Biotechnological Approach for the Topical Treatment of Psoriasis. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Cabanillas, A.H.; Tena Pérez, V.; Maderuelo Corral, S.; Rosero Valencia, D.F.; Martel Quintana, A.; Ortega Doménech, M.; Rumbero Sánchez, Á. Cybastacines A and B: Antibiotic Sesterterpenes from a Nostoc sp. Cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 410–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mo, S.; Krunic, A.; Pegan, S.D.; Franzblau, S.G.; Orjala, J. An Antimicrobial Guanidine-Bearing Sesterterpene from the Cultured Cyanobacterium Scytonema sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 2043–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kulasooriya, S.A.; Magana-Arachchi, D.N. Nitrogen Fixing Cyanobacteria: Their Diversity, Ecology and Utilization with Special Reference to Rice Cultivation. J. Natl. Sci. Found. Sri Lanka 2016, 44, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Singh, J.S.; Kumar, A.; Rai, A.N.; Singh, D.P. Cyanobacteria: A Precious Bio-Resource in Agriculture, Ecosystem, and Environmental Sustainability. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Bajpai, V.K.; Shukla, S.; Kang, S.M.; Hwang, S.K.; Song, X.; Huh, Y.S.; Han, Y.K. Developments of Cyanobacteria for Nano-Marine Drugs: Relevance of Nanoformulations in Cancer Therapies. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Deviram, G.; Mathimani, T.; Anto, S.; Ahamed, T.S.; Ananth, D.A.; Pugazhendhi, A. Applications of Microalgal and Cyanobacterial Biomass on a Way to Safe, Cleaner and a Sustainable Environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. de Farias Silva, C.E.; Bertucco, A. Bioethanol from Microalgae and Cyanobacteria: A Review and Technological Outlook. Process Biochem. 2016, 51, 1833–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pulz, O.; Gross, W. Valuable Products from Biotechnology of Microalgae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mourelle, M.L.; Gómez, C.P.; Legido, J.L. The Potential Use of Marine Microalgae and Cyanobacteria in Cosmetics and Thalassotherapy. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Angermayr, S.A.; Hellingwerf, K.J.; Lindblad, P.; Teixeira de Mattos, M.J. Energy Biotechnology with Cyanobacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2009, 20, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Abed, R.M.M.; Dobretsov, S.; Sudesh, K. Applications of Cyanobacteria in Biotechnology. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 106, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Markou, G.; Chentir, I.; Tzovenis, I. Microalgae and Cyanobacteria as Food: Legislative and Safety Aspects. Cult. Microalgae Food Ind. Curr. Potential Appl. 2021, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Khan, Z.; Bhadouria, P.; Bisen, P. Nutritional and Therapeutic Potential of Spirulina. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2005, 6, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Campanella, L.; Russo, M.; Chim, P.A.-A. Free and Total Amino Acid Composition in Blue-Green Algae. Ann. Chim 2002, 92, 343–352. [Google Scholar]
  103. Marsan, D.W.; Conrad, S.M.; Stutts, W.L.; Parker, C.H.; Deeds, J.R. Evaluation of Microcystin Contamination in Blue-Green Algal Dietary Supplements Using a Protein Phosphatase Inhibition-Based Test Kit. Heliyon 2018, 4, e00573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Omatola, C.A.; Okolo, M.L.O.; Adaji, D.M.; Mofolorunsho, C.K.; Oyiguh, J.A.; Zige, D.V.; Akpala, N.S.; Samson, S.O. Coinfection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients with Hepatitis B Virus in Lokoja, North Central Nigeria. Viral Immunol. 2020, 33, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gregoire, E.; Pirotte, B.F.; Moerman, F.; Altdorfer, A.; Gaspard, L.; Firre, E.; Moonen, M.; Darcis, G. Mycobacterium Avium Complex and Cryptococcus Neoformans Co-Infection in a Patient with Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome: A Case Report. Acta Clin. Belgica Int. J. Clin. Lab. Med. 2022, 77, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Qamar, H.; Hussain, K.; Soni, A.; Khan, A.; Hussain, T.; Chénais, B. Cyanobacteria as Natural Therapeutics and Pharmaceutical Potential: Role in Antitumor Activity and as Nanovectors. Molecules 2021, 26, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Mayer, A.M.S.; Rodríguez, A.D.; Berlinck, R.G.S.; Hamann, M.T. Marine Pharmacology in 2005-6: Marine Compounds with Anthelmintic, Antibacterial, Anticoagulant, Antifungal, Anti-Inflammatory, Antimalarial, Antiprotozoal, Antituberculosis, and Antiviral Activities; Affecting the Cardiovascular, Immune and Nervous Systems, and Other Miscellaneous Mechanisms of Action. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1790, 283–308. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Wase, N.V.; Wright, P.C. Systems Biology of Cyanobacterial Secondary Metabolite Production and Its Role in Drug Discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2008, 3, 903–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Dittmann, E.; Neilan, B.; Börner, T. Molecular Biology of Peptide and Polyketide Biosynthesis in Cyanobacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 57, 467–473. [Google Scholar]
  110. Volk, R.B. Screening of Microalgae for Species Excreting Norharmane, a Manifold Biologically Active Indole Alkaloid. Microbiol. Res. 2008, 163, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sato, S.I.; Murata, A.; Orihara, T.; Shirakawa, T.; Suenaga, K.; Kigoshi, H.; Uesugi, M. Marine Natural Product Aurilide Activates the OPA1-Mediated Apoptosis by Binding to Prohibitin. Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Han, B.; Gross, H.; Goeger, D.E.; Mooberry, S.L.; Gerwick, W.H. Aurilides B and C, Cancer Cell Toxins from a Papua New Guinea Collection of the Marine Cyanobacterium Lyngbya Majuscula. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 572–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Watanabe, A.; Ohno, O.; Morita, M.; Inuzuka, T.; Suenaga, K. Structures and Biological Activities of Novel Biselyngbyaside Analogs Isolated from the Marine Cyanobacterium Lyngbya sp. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2015, 88, 1256–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Teruya, T.; Sasaki, H.; Kitamura, K.; Nakayama, T.; Suenaga, K. Biselyngbyaside, a Macrolide Glycoside from the Marine Cyanobacterium Lyngbya sp. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2421–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kang, H.K.; Choi, M.C.; Seo, C.H.; Park, Y. Therapeutic Properties and Biological Benefits of Marine-Derived Anticancer Peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Borbély, A.; Figueras, E.; Martins, A.; Esposito, S.; Auciello, G.; Monteagudo, E.; Di Marco, A.; Summa, V.; Cordella, P.; Perego, R.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of RGD−Cryptophycin Conjugates for Targeted Drug Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Hermann, P.; Armant, M.; Brown, E.; Rubio, M.; Ishihara, H.; Ulrich, D.; Caspary, R.G.; Lindberg, F.P.; Armitage, R.; Maliszewski, C.; et al. The Vitronectin Receptor and Its Associated CD47 Molecule Mediates Proinflammatory Cytokine Synthesis in Human Monocytes by Interaction with Soluble CD23. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 144, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Robles-Bañuelos, B.; Durán-Riveroll, L.M.; Rangel-López, E.; Pérez-López, H.I.; González-Maya, L. Marine Cyanobacteria as Sources of Lead Anticancer Compounds: A Review of Families of Metabolites with Cytotoxic, Antiproliferative, and Antineoplastic Effects. Molecules 2022, 27, 4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Thornburg, C.C.; Cowley, E.S.; Sikorska, J.; Shaala, L.A.; Ishmael, J.E.; Youssef, D.T.A.; McPhail, K.L. Apratoxin H and Apratoxin A Sulfoxide from the Red Sea Cyanobacterium Moorea Producens. J. Nat. Prod. 2013, 76, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Tiwari, A.K.; Tiwari, B.S. Cyanotherapeutics: An emerging field for future drug discovery. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 1, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Vijayakumar, S.; Menakha, M. Pharmaceutical Applications of Cyanobacteria—A Review. J. Acute Med. 2015, 5, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Favas, R.; Morone, J.; Martins, R.; Vasconcelos, V.; Lopes, G. Cyanobacteria Secondary Metabolites as Biotechnological Ingredients in Natural Anti-Aging Cosmetics: Potential to Overcome Hyperpigmentation, Loss of Skin Density and UV Radiation-Deleterious Effects. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Morone, J.; Lopes, G.; Oliveira, B.; Vasconcelos, V.; Martins, R. Cyanobacteria in Cosmetics: A Natural Alternative for Anti-Aging Ingredients. Pharmacol. Potential Cyanobacteria 2022, 257–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Samadhiya, K.; Sangtani, R.; Nogueira, R.; Bala, K. Insightful Advancement and Opportunities for Microbial Bioplastic Production. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 3755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Savakis, P.; Hellingwerf, K.J. Engineering Cyanobacteria for Direct Biofuel Production from CO2. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Klanchui, A.; Raethong, N.; Prommeenate, P.; Vongsangnak, W.; Meechai, A. Cyanobacterial Biofuels: Strategies and Developments on Network and Modeling. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 160, 75–102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  127. Kiran, B.; Kumar, R.; Deshmukh, D. Perspectives of Microalgal Biofuels as a Renewable Source of Energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 88, 1228–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Durall, C.; Kukil, K.; Hawkes, J.A.; Albergati, A.; Lindblad, P.; Lindberg, P. Production of Succinate by Engineered Strains of Synechocystis PCC 6803 Overexpressing Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase and a Glyoxylate Shunt. Microb. Cell Fact. 2021, 20–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Successful Method Yielding High Rate of D-Lactate Using Cyanobacteria Could Revolutionize Bioplastic Production | Research at Kobe. Available online: https://www.kobe-u.ac.jp/research_at_kobe_en/NEWS/news/2020_03_10_02.html (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  130. Hidese, R.; Matsuda, M.; Osanai, T.; Hasunuma, T.; Kondo, A. Malic Enzyme Facilitates d -Lactate Production through Increased Pyruvate Supply during Anoxic Dark Fermentation in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. ACS Synth. Biol. 2020, 9, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Coverage of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Petroleum Use under Climate Policy—Center for Climate and Energy SolutionsCenter for Climate and Energy Solutions. Available online: https://www.c2es.org/document/coverage-of-greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-petroleum-use-under-climate-policy/ (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  132. What Are Greenhouse Gases | GHG Emissions & Canada’s Carbon Footprint. Available online: https://www.capp.ca/explore/greenhouse-gas-emissions/ (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  133. Doamekpor, L.K.; Onwona-Agyeman, R.; Ameka, G.K. Bioenergy: Biodiesel from Freshwater Green Microalgae and a Cyanobacterium Occurring in Ghana. West Afr. J. Appl. Ecol. 2020, 27, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  134. Nozzi, N.E.; Oliver, J.W.K.; Atsumi, S. Cyanobacteria as a Platform for Biofuel Production. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2013, 1, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Cyanobacteria: Recent Advances in Taxonomy and Applications–Google Books. Available online: https://books.google.pl/books?id=sbZaEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=cyanobacteria+capable+of+growing+in+brackish+or+saltwater+to+produce+a+range+of+biofuels+such+as+ethanol,+biodiesel,+gasoline+and+jet+fuel+in+addition+to+other+valuable+chemicals&source=bl&ots=ZrzLnyti-S&sig=ACfU3U0LletVZ4G5VWJpux2zCP8AojcWOQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwirhNDE27L6AhXzhP0HHc-uA7kQ6AF6BAgCEAM#v=onepage&q=cyanobacteria capable of growing in brackish or saltwater to produce a range of biofuels such as ethanol%2C biodiesel%2C gasoline and jet fuel in addition to other valuable chemicals&f=false (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  136. Joule Unlimited | Solving the Energy Crisis with Affordable, Renewable Clean Fuel. Available online: https://www.jouleunlimited.com/ (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  137. The Algenol Advantage | Algenol Biotech. Available online: https://www.algenol.com/ (accessed on 26 September 2022).
  138. Tom, A.P.; Jayakumar, J.S.; Biju, M.; Somarajan, J. Aquaculture wastewater treatment technologies and their sustainability: A review. Energy Nexus 2021, 4, 100022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Srimongkola, P.; Thongchul, N.; Phunpruchd, S.; Karnchanatat, A. Ability of marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. VDW to remove ammonium from brackish aquaculture wastewater. Agric. Water Manag. 2019, 212, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Callieri, C. Synechococcus plasticity under environmental changes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnx229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Potnis, A.A.; Raghavan, P.S.; Rajaram, H. Overview on cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides and biofilms: Role in bioremediation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2021, 20, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Papadopoulos, K.P.; Economou, C.N.; Dailianis, S.; Charalampous, N.; Stefanidou, N.; Moustaka-Gouni, M.; Tekerlekopoulou, A.G.; Vayenasa, D.V. Brewery wastewater treatment using cyanobacterial-bacterial settleable aggregates. Algal. Res. 2020, 49, 101957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Papadopoulos, K.P.; Economou, C.N.; Tekerlekopoulou, A.G.; Vayenasa, D.V. Two-step treatment of brewery wastewater using electrocoagulation and cyanobacteria-based cultivation aggregates. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 265, 110543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Papadopoulos, K.P.; Economou, C.N.; Tekerlekopoulou, A.G.; Vayenasa, D.V. A Cyanobacteria-Based Biofilm System for Advanced Brewery Wastewater Treatment. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Sen, S.; Bhardwaj, K.; Thakurta, S.G.; Chakrabarty, J.; Ghanta, K.C.; Dutta, S. Phycoremediation of cyanide from coke–oven wastewater using cyanobacterial consortium. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 15, 2151–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Arias, D.M.; Uggetti, E.; García, J. Assessing the potential of soil cyanobacteria for simultaneous wastewater treatment and carbohydrate-enriched biomass production. Algal. Res. 2020, 51, 102042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. El-Bestawy, E.A.; Abd El-Salam, A.Z.; Mansy, A.E. Potential use of environmental cyanobacterial species in bioremediation of lindane-contaminated effluents. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2007, 59, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Baptista, M.; Vasconcelos, T. Cyanobacteria metal interactions: Requirements, toxicity, and ecological implications. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 32, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Cui, J.; Xie, Y.; Sun, T.; Chen, L.; Zhang, W. Deciphering and engineering photosynthetic cyanobacteria for heavy metal bioremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 761, 144111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Kumar, V.; Dwivedi, S.K. A review on accessible techniques for removal of hexavalent Chromium and divalent Nickel from industrial wastewater: Recent research and future outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sena, S.; Dutta, S.; Guhathakurata, S.; Chakrabarty, J.; Nandi, S.; Dutta, A. Removal of Cr(VI) using a cyanobacterial consortium and assessment of biofuel production. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 119, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Shukla, D.; Vankar, P.S.; Srivastava, S.K. Bioremediation of hexavalent chromium by a cyanobacterial mat. Appl. Water Sci. 2012, 2, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Fatima, G.; Raza, A.M.; Hadi, N.; Nigam, N.; Mahdi, A.A. Cadmium in Human Diseases: It’s More than Just a Mere Metal. Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2019, 34, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Raghavana, P.S.; Potnis, A.A.; Bhattacharyya, K.; Salaskar, D.A.; Rajaram, H. Axenic cyanobacterial (Nostoc muscorum) biofilm as a platform for Cd(II) sequestration from aqueous solutions. Algal. Res. 2020, 46, 101778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ghorbani, E.; Nowruzi, B.; Nezhadali, M.; Hekmat, M. Metal removal capability of two cyanobacterial species in autotrophic and mixotrophic mode of nutrition. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Bon, I.C.; Salvatierra, L.C.; Lario, L.D.; Morató, J.; Pérez, L.M. Prospects in Cadmium-ContaminatedWater Management Using Free-Living Cyanobacteria (Oscillatoria sp.). Water 2021, 13, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Fawzy, M.A.; Mohamed, A.K.S.H. Bioremediation of heavy metals from municipal sewage by cyanobacteria and its effects on growth and some metabolites of Beta vulgaris. J. Plant. Nutr. 2017, 40, 2550–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Akoijam, C.; Langpoklakpam, J.S.; Chettri, B.; Singh, K.M. Cyanobacterial diversity in hydrocarbon-polluted sediments and their possible role in bioremediation. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 103, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Forlani, G.; Prearo, V.; Wieczorek, D.; Kafarski, P.; Lipok, J. Phosphonate degradation by Spirulina strains: Cyanobacterial biofilters for the removal of anticorrosive polyphosphonates from wastewater. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2011, 48, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Thakurta, S.G.; Aakula, M.; Chakrabarty, J.; Dutta, S. Bioremediation of phenol from synthetic and real wastewater using Leptolyngbya sp.: A comparison and assessment of lipid production. 3 Biotech 2018, 8, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Ibraheem, I.B.M. Biodegradability of hydrocarbons by cyanobacteria. J. Phycol. 2010, 46, 818–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. El-Sheekh, M.M.; Gharieb, M.M.; Abou-El-Souod, G.W. Biodegradation of dyes by some green algae and cyanobacteria. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2009, 63, 699–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Dellamatrice, P.M.; Silva-Stenico, M.E.; Beraldo de Moraes, L.A.; Fiore, M.F.; Rosim Monteiro, R.T. Degradation of textile dyes by cyanobacteria. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2017, 48, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Bonini, C.; Righi, G. Enantio-and stereo-selective route to the taxol side chain via asymmetric epoxidation of trans-cinnamyl alcohol and subsequent expoxide ring opening. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1994, 24, 2767–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Yamanaka, R.; Nakamura, K.; Murakami, M.; Murakami, A. Selective synthesis of cinnamyl alcohol by cyanobacterial photobiocatalysts. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 1089–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Molinari, F.; Gandolfi, R.; Villa, R.; Occhiato, E.G. Lyophilised yeasts: Easy-to-handle biocatalysts for stereoselective reduction of ketones. Tetrahedron Asymmetr. 1999, 10, 3515–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Głąb, A.; Szmigiel-Merena, B.; Brzezińska-Rodak, M.; Żymańczyk-Duda, E. Biotransformation of 1- and 2-phenylethanol to products of high value via redox reactions. BioTechnologia 2016, 97, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Chang, X.; Yang, Z.; Zeng, R.; Yang, G.; Yan, J. Production of chiral aromatic alcohol by asymmetric reduction with vegetable catalyst. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 18, 1029–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yang, Z.-H.; Luo, L.; Chang, X.; Zhou, W.; Chen, G.-H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.-J. Production of chiral alcohols from prochiral ketones by microalgal photo-biocatalytic asymmetric reduction reaction. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 39, 835–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Żymańczyk-Duda, E.; Głąb, A.; Górak, M.; Klimek-Ochab, M.; Brzezińska-Rodak, M.; Strub, D.; Śliżewska, A. Reductive capabilities of different cyanobacterial strains towards acetophenone as a model substrate—Prospect of applications for chiral building blocks synthesis. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 93, 102810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Patel, D.V.; Rielly-Gauvin, K.; Ryono, D.E.; Free, C.A.; Rogers, W.L.; Smith, S.A.; DeForrest, J.M.; Oehl, R.S.; Petrillo, E.W., Jr. Alpha-Hydroxy phosphinyl-based inhibitors of human renin. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4557–4569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Stowasser, B.; Budt, K.-H.; Jian-Qi, L.; Peyman, A. New hybrid transition state analog inhibitors of HIV protease with peripheric C2-symmetry. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Yokomatsu, T.; Murano, T.; Akiyama, T.; Koizumi, J.; Shimeno, H.; Tsuji, Y.; Soeda, S.; Shimeno, H. Improved Synthesis of 1,3-Propanediol Derivatives Having a Diethoxyphosphoryldifluoroethyl Functional Group at the 2-Position: Application to Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Novel Acyclic Nucleotide Analogues of Adenosine Bisphosphates. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Żymańczyk-Duda, E.; Kafarski, P.; Lejczak, B. Reductive biotransformation of diethyl beta-, gamma- and delta-oxoalkylphosphonates by cells of baker’s yeast. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 26, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Żymańczyk-Duda, E.; Brzezińska-Rodak, M.; Klimek-Ochab, M.; Latajka, R.; Kafarski, P.; Lejczak, B. Chiral O-phosphorylated derivative of 2-hydroxy-phenylethylphosphonate as a valuable product of microbial biotransformation of diethyl 2-oxo-2-phenylethylphosphonate. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2008, 52, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Górak, M.; Żymańczyk-Duda, E. Application of cyanobacteria for chiral phosphonate synthesis. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Górak, M.; Żymańczyk-Duda, E. Reductive activity of free and immobilized cells of cyanobacteria towar oxophosphonates—Comparative study. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Harrison, W.; Huang, X.; Zhao, H. Photobiocatalysis for abiological transformations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Emmanuel, M.A.; Greenberg, N.R.; Oblinsky, D.G.; Hyster, T.K. Accessing non-natural reactivity by irradiating nicotinamide dependent enzymes with light. Nature 2016, 540, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Biegasiewicz, K.F.; Cooper, S.J.; Gao, X.; Oblinsky, D.G.; Kim, J.H.; Garfinkle, S.E.; Joyce, L.A.; Sandoval, B.A.; Scholes, G.D.; Hyster, T.K. Photoexcitation of flavoenzymes enables a stereoselective radical cyclization. Science 2019, 364, 1166–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Gao, X.; Turek-Herman, J.R.; Joo Choi, Y.; Cohen, R.; Hyster, T. Photoenzymatic synthesis of α-tertiary amines by engineered flavin-dependent ‘ene’-reductases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 19643–19647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Sandoval, B.A.; Clayman, P.D.; Oblinsky, D.G.; Oh, S.; Nakano, Y.; Bird, M.; Scholes, G.D.; Hyster, T.K. Photoenzymatic reductions enabled by direct excitation of flavin-dependent “ene”- reductases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1735–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Sorigue, D.; Legeret, B.; Cuine, S.; Blangy, S.; Moulin, S.; Billon, E.; Richaud, P.; Brugiere, S.; Coute, Y.; Nurizzo, D.; et al. An algal photoenzyme converts fatty acids to hydrocarbons. Science 2017, 357, 903–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  184. Huijbers, M.M.E.; Zhang, W.; Tonin, F.; Hollman, F. Light-Driven Enzymatic Decarboxylation of Fatty Acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13648–13651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Zhang, W.; Ma, M.; Huijbers, M.M.E.; Filonenko, G.A.; Pidko, E.A.; van Schie, M.; de Boer, S.; Burek, B.O.; Bloh, J.Z.; van Berkel, W.J.H.; et al. Hydrocarbon Synthesis via Photoenzymatic Decarboxylation of Carboxylic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 3116–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Ma, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, P.; Hollmann, F.; Wang, Y. Photoenzymatic production of next generation biofuels from natural triglycerides combining a hydrolase and a photodecarboxylase. ChemPhotoChem 2020, 4, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Possible reduction of cinnamaldehyde.
Scheme 1. Possible reduction of cinnamaldehyde.
Microorganisms 10 02318 sch001
Scheme 2. Possible effects of light on enzyme activity in phototrophic organisms.
Scheme 2. Possible effects of light on enzyme activity in phototrophic organisms.
Microorganisms 10 02318 sch002
Scheme 3. Photodecarboxylase action.
Scheme 3. Photodecarboxylase action.
Microorganisms 10 02318 sch003
Scheme 4. Cascade of the reactions.
Scheme 4. Cascade of the reactions.
Microorganisms 10 02318 sch004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Żymańczyk-Duda, E.; Samson, S.O.; Brzezińska-Rodak, M.; Klimek-Ochab, M. Versatile Applications of Cyanobacteria in Biotechnology. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122318

AMA Style

Żymańczyk-Duda E, Samson SO, Brzezińska-Rodak M, Klimek-Ochab M. Versatile Applications of Cyanobacteria in Biotechnology. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(12):2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Żymańczyk-Duda, Ewa, Sunday Ocholi Samson, Małgorzata Brzezińska-Rodak, and Magdalena Klimek-Ochab. 2022. "Versatile Applications of Cyanobacteria in Biotechnology" Microorganisms 10, no. 12: 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10122318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop