Becoming a Net Receiver of International Migrants: An Age-Structural Model of the Shift to Persistently Positive Net Migration Rates
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. The Problem
1.2. Objectives
- To determine if, as countries advance through the age-structural transition (the gradual shift from a youthful, high-fertility population to a low-fertility population that is distributionally much more mature), they generally (with noted exceptions) experience an increasing probability of becoming a continuous net receiver of international migrants;
- To hypothesize a population median age that could be used to reasonably project the timing of a country’s future shift to performing as a continuous net receiver of international migrants;
- To characterize exceptional types of countries (i.e., outlier groups) that are unlikely to adhere to that hypothesized timing.
2. The Shift to Continuous +NMRs
2.1. Drivers of the Shift to +NMRs
2.2. Age-Structure and the Shift to +NMRs


3. Data and Methods
3.1. Geographic and Temporal Extent of Data
3.2. Age-Structural Modeling
- the median age at the inflection point, IP, which is indicative of the age-structural timing of peak change;
- P(15), which reflects the probability at which countries are likely to attain y = 1 in the earliest phase of the age-structural transition;
- P(45), which indicates the probability of y = 1 near the beginning of the post-mature phase of the age-structural transition;
- an estimate of the function’s first derivative at IP, , indicating how abruptly (steeply) the shift from y = 0 to y = 1 occurs (a larger P’(IP) indicates a steeper shift to y = 1 around the inflection point).
3.3. The Dependent Variable: Persistently +NMR
- reflect a substantial degree of serial continuity of +NMRs, rather than respond to each acute +NMR or discontinuous set of +NMRs in countries that frequently undergo NMR sign switching;
- exhibit a monotonic functional relationship with median age that would be an appropriate fit for logistic regression analysis.
3.4. Fixed-Effects: Controlling for Countries and Years

3.5. Within-Sample and Out-of-Sample Testing
3.6. Experimental Analyses
3.7. The Empirical Peak Shift to Persistently +NMRs
3.8. A Cut Point for +NMRs
- the proportion of correct predictions of +NMRs at median ages higher than the cut point’s median age (a proportion that is expected to decrease as the cut point increases), and
- the odds ratio of a correct prediction of +NMRs (a ratio that is expected to increase as the cut point increases).
- The theoretical graph uses a proportion of correct predictions and the odds ratios that were generated from the functional probabilities of P(m)*. These results assume a limitless number of evenly distributed observations and a precise fit to the standard model, P(m)*. In this theoretical graph, the cut point was moved from a median age of 15 to 48 years.
- The second graph describes empirical proportions of correct predictions and odds ratios that were determined from reserve data (years 2021 to 2023). For these empirical results, the cut point was started at a median age of 15 years and ended at 42 years, after which fewer than 15 observations were available.
4. Results
4.1. Age Structure’s Relationship with Persistently +NMRs
4.2. Models with Fixed Effects
4.3. Outlier Groups
4.4. Evidence of Proximate Effects
4.5. The Shift to Persistently +NMRs
4.6. A Median-Age Cut Point for +NMRs
5. Discussion
5.1. Hypothetical Predictions: Asia, Latin America, and North Africa
- North Africa, probably in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia, which are likely to receive increasing inflows of migrants from the Sahel, coastal West Africa, and other Arab states, which could outpace migrant outflows from North Africa.
- South Asia, most likely India, which could receive an even greater influx of migrants from nearby South Asian states (Nepal, Bangladesh), and perhaps from more distant, less developed countries in Southeast Asia and East Africa.
- Southeast Asia, particularly in Malaysia (already a migrant net receiver) and Indonesia, which could experience an increased inflow of migrants from less economically developed parts of South Asia, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East (and possibly skilled professionals from India and China, which have diaspora populations in these countries).
- Latin America, probably in Brazil and Colombia (both have recently become migrant net receivers, primarily due to the influx of Venezuelans), as well as Ecuador, Mexico, and Uruguay, which could receive larger inflows from poor communities in the Andean and Central American regions. As Argentina and Chile (both of which have recently become net receivers) continue to develop economically, these already cosmopolitan societies could experience a greater influx of international migrants of Latin American origin, as well as from more distant regions, as they have in the past.
5.2. Hypothetical Predictions: Sub-Saharan Africa
- Senegal, a relatively politically stable coastal West African state that, while still youthful, serves as a conduit for migrants leaving the conflict-torn Sahel, many of whom later head northward, primarily to the Maghreb and Europe;
- Some of sub-Saharan Africa’s most oil-rich rentier states (Gabon, Equatorial Guinea, and Angola), which attract workers from West and Central Africa;
- Southern African states (particularly South Africa and Namibia), which tend to attract professionals and workers from various parts of the continent.
6. Conclusions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| FH | Freedom House |
| GCC | Gulf Cooperation Council |
| NMR | International net migration rate |
| OPEC | Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries |
| WB | World Bank |
| UN | United Nations |
| UNPD | United Nations Population Division |
Appendix A
| Outcome Variable: Annual Probability of a Persistently +NMR † | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logit Parameter Coefficients and Standard Errors †† | ||||
| Models: | Model A1a | Model A1b ††† | Model A1c | Model A1d |
| Standard Model | ||||
| Period: | 1990–2015 | 1990–2015 | 1990–2015 | 1990–2015 |
| Graphic function: | Figure 4a | |||
| Domain variable [continuous] | ||||
| Median age | 0.099 *** (0.004) | 0.111 *** (0.005) | 0.111 *** (0.005) | 0.100 *** (0.004) |
| Standard independent var. [dichotomous] | ||||
| A Resource-reliant states (=0) | --- | −1.312 *** (0.123) | −1.046 *** (0.102) | --- |
| B Least populated states (=0) | --- | 0.434 *** (0.092) | --- | 0.045 (0.075) |
| Constant | −3.400 (0.124) | −2.876 (0.136) | −2.836 (0.134) | −3.407 (0.129) |
| n | 4129 | 4129 | 4129 | 4129 |
| N (average countries per year) | 163 | 163 | 163 | 163 |
| IP = (median age of inflection point) | 34 years | 34 years | 35 years | 35 years |
| P(15), P(45) (P at median ages 15, 45) | 0.14, 0.74 | 0.12, 0.77 | 0.13, 0.74 | 0.14, 0.76 |
| P’(IP) (change in P near IP) | 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.025 | 0.025 |
| Outcome Variable: Annual Probability of a Persistently +NMR † | ||
|---|---|---|
| Logit Parameter Coefficients and Standard Errors †† | ||
| Models: | Model A2a ††† (A1b) | Model A2b |
| Standard Model | ||
| Period: | 1990–2015 | 1990–2015 |
| Graphic function: | Figure 4a | |
| Domain variable [continuous] | ||
| Median age | 0.111 *** (0.005) | 0.110 *** (0.005) |
| Standard controls [dichotomous] | ||
| A Resource-reliant states (=0) | −1.317 *** (0.123) | −1.049 *** (0.129) |
| B Least populated states (=0) | 0.434 *** (0.092) | 0.309 ** (0.099) |
| Experimental controls [dichotomous] | ||
| C Negative high-amplitude NMRs (< −10.0) (= 0) | --- | 2.307 *** (0.284) |
| D Positive high-amplitude NMRs (> +10.0) (= 0) | --- | −1.100 *** (0.131) |
| Constant | −2.876 (0.136) | −4.222 (0.335) |
| n | 4129 | 4129 |
| N (average countries per year) | 163 | 163 |
| IP = (median age at inflection point) | 34 years | 34 years |
| P(15), P(45) (P at median ages 15, 45) | 0.12, 0.77 | 0.11, 0.78 |
| P’(IP) (change in P near IP) | 0.028 | 0.028 |
| Outcome Variable: Annual Probability of a Persistently +NMR † | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logit Parameter Coefficients and Standard Errors †† | |||||
| Models: | Model A3a ††† (A1b) | Model A3b | Model A3c | Model A3d | Model A3e |
| Standard Model | |||||
| Period: | 1990–2015 | 1990–2015 | 1990–2015 | 1990–2015 | 1990–2015 |
| Graphic function: | Figure 4a | ||||
| Domain variable [continuous] | |||||
| Median age | 0.111 *** (0.005) | 0.103 *** (0.005) | 0.038 *** (0.006) | 0.079 *** (0.005) | 0.019 ** (0.007) |
| Standard controls [dichotomous] | |||||
| A Resource-reliant states (=0) | −1. 317 *** (0.123) | −1.643 *** (0.135) | −1.115 *** (0.131) | −1.670 *** (0.129) | −1.358 *** (0.134) |
| B Least populated states (=0) | 0. 434*** (0.092) | 0.500 *** (0.092) | 0.395 *** (0.099) | 0.493 *** (0.093) | 0.438 *** (0.099) |
| Experimental controls [dichotomous] | |||||
| FH Not Free status (=0) | --- | 0.691 *** (0.101) | --- | --- | --- |
| WB High income (=0) | --- | --- | −2.166 *** (0.117) | --- | −1.960 *** (0.119) |
| FH Free status (=0) | --- | --- | --- | −1.105 *** (0.094) | −0.802 *** (0.104) |
| Constant | −2.876 (0.136) | −2.938 (0.138) | 0.456 (0.232) | −1.138 (0.199) | 1.199 (0.273) |
| n | 4129 | 4129 | 4129 | 4129 | 4129 |
| N (average countries per year) | 163 | 163 | 163 | 163 | 163 |
(median age at inflection point) | 34 years | 33 years | 62 years | 44 years | 115 years |
| P(15), P(45) (P at median ages 15, 45) | 0.12, 0.77 | 0.14, 0.79 | 0.14, 0.35 | 0.09, 0.54 | 0.14, 0.21 |
| P’(IP) (change in P near IP) | 0.028 | 0.026 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.005 |
| Annual Probability of Experiencing a Persistently +NMR † | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Logit Parameter Coefficients and Standard Errors †† | |||
| Models: | Model A4a ††† (A1b) | Model A4b | Model A4c |
| Standard Model | |||
| Post-Cold War | Cold War Model | Full data | |
| Period: | 1990–2015 | 1970–1989 | 1970–2015 |
| Graphic function: | Figure 4a | ||
| Domain variable [continuous] | |||
| Median age | 0.111 *** (0.005) | 0.192 *** (0.009) | 0.117 *** (0.004) |
| Standard controls [dichotomous] | |||
| A Resource-reliant states (=0) | −1.317 *** (0.123) | −1.301 *** (0.157) | −1.211 *** (0.096) |
| B Least populated states (=0) | 0.434 *** (0.092) | −0.533 *** (0.120) | 0.140 * (0.071) |
| Constant | −2.876 (0.136) | −3.586 (0.198) | −2.763 (0.107) |
| n | 4129 | 2591 | 6720 |
| N (average countries per year) | 163 | 151 | 158 |
| IP = (median age inflection point) | 34 years | 28 years | 33 years |
| P(15), P(45) (P at median ages 15, 45) | 0.12, 0.77 | 0.09, 0.96 | 0.13, 0.82 |
| P’(IP) (change in P near IP) | 0.028 | 0.047 | 0.029 |
| Outcome Variable: Annual Probability of a Persistently +NMR † | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logit Parameter Coefficients and Standard Errors †† | ||||
| Models: | Model A5a (A4c) | Model A5b | Model A5c | Model A5d |
| Effects: | Random | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed |
| (countries) | (years) | (countries, years) | ||
| Period: | 1970–2015 | 1970–2015 | 1970–2015 | 1970–2015 |
| Domain variable [continuous] | ||||
| Median age | 0.117 *** (0.004) | 0.107 *** (0.017) | 0.120 *** (0.004) | 0.154 *** (0.028) |
| Standard controls [dichotomous] | ||||
| A Resource-reliant states (=0) | 1.211 *** (0.096) | --- | --- | |
| B Least populated states (=0) | −0.140 * (0.071) | --- | --- | --- |
| Constant | −2.763 (0.108) | −3.983 (0.582) | −3.268 (0.111) | −4.320 (0.724) |
| n | 6720 | 6720 | 6720 | 6720 |
| N (average countries per year) | 158 | 158 | 158 | 158 |
| IP = (median age inflection point) | 33 years | 37 years | 27 years | 27 years |
| P(15), P(45) (P at median ages 15, 45) | 0.13, 0.82 | 0.0---9, 0.70 | 0.19, 0.90 | 0.13, 0.94 |
| P’(IP) (change in P near IP) | 0.029 | 0.023 | 0.030 | 0.038 |
Appendix B




References
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 1998 Revision; ST/ESA/P/WP.150; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1999; Available online: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1491150?ln=en (accessed on 20 May 2023).
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2024: Methodology of the United Nations Population Estimates and Projections; UN DESA/POP/2022/DC/NO. 10; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp. 1–86. [Google Scholar]
- Abel, G.J.; Cohen, J.E. Bilateral international migration flow estimates for 200 countries. Sci. Data 2019, 6, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abel, G.J.; Cohen, J.E. Bilateral international migration flow estimates updated and refined by sex. Sci. Data 2022, 9, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abel, G.J.; Sander, N. Quantifying global international migration flows. Science 2014, 343, 1520–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects, the 2024 Revision; POP/DB/WPP/Rev.2024/GEN/F01; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2024; Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/ (accessed on 1 September 2024).
- Azose, J.; Raftery, A.E. Bayesian probabilistic projection of international migration. Demography 2015, 52, 1627–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azose, J.; Ševčíková, H.; Raftery, A.E. Probabilistic population projections with migration uncertainty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6460–6465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2022: Methodology of the United Nations Population Estimates and Projections; UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 4; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/assets/Files/WPP2022_Methodology.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2025).
- UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects, 2019: Methodology of the United Nations Population Estimates and Projections; ST/ESA/SER.A/425; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/assets/Files/WPP2019_Methodology.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2025).
- Lakatos, I. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers, Volume No. 1; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1978; pp. 8–101. [Google Scholar]
- World Bank. World Development Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees, and Societies; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; pp. 43–59. [Google Scholar]
- Simpson, N.B. Demographic and economic determinants of migration. IZA World Labor 2022, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, G. The Challenge of Immigration: A Radical Solution; Institute of Economic Affairs Monographs: London, UK, 2011; pp. 19–34. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3922137 (accessed on 5 November 2025).
- Canales, A. Migration, Reproduction and Society: Economic and Demographic Dilemmas in Global Capitalism; Haymarket: Chicago, IL, USA; pp. 34–53.
- Harris, J.R.; Todaro, M.P. Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 1970, 60, 126–142. [Google Scholar]
- Massey, D.S.; Arango, J.; Hugo, G.; Kouaouci, A.; Pellegrino, A.; Taylor, J.E. Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Popul. Dev. Rev. 1993, 19, 431–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skeldon, R. Population Mobility in Developing Countries: A Reinterpretation; Belhaven Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Hazán, M. Understanding Return Migration to Mexico: Towards a Comprehensive Policy for the Reintegration of Returning Migrants; CCIS Working Paper, No. 193; Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California San Diego: San Diego, CA, USA, 2014; Available online: https://ccis.ucsd.edu/_files/wp193.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2025).
- Coale, A.J.; Hoover, E.M. Population Growth and Economic Development in Low-Income Countries: A Case Study of India’s Prospect; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1958. [Google Scholar]
- Möller, H. Youth as a Force in the Modern World. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 1968, 10, 237–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zelinsky, W. The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geogr. Rev. 1971, 61, 219–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lutz, W.; Butz, W.P.; KC, S. World Population and Human Capital in the Twenty-First Century; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis: Laxenberg, Austria, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Cincotta, R. The age-structural theory of state behavior. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; Available online: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-327 (accessed on 21 August 2023).
- Lee, R.; Mason, A. Population Aging and the Generational Economy: A Global Perspective; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham Glos, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Weber, H. Demography and democracy: The impact of youth cohort size on democratic stability in the world. Democratization 2013, 20, 335–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyson, T. On the democratic and demographic transitions. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2013, 38, 83–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cincotta, R. Half a chance: Youth bulges and transitions to liberal democracy. Environ. Change Secur. Proj. Rep. 2008, 13, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Y.; Luo, Z. Age structure and democratic development: The non-linear and conditional role of youth bulges. World Dev. 2025, 195, 107132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cincotta, R. Population age structure and the vulnerability of states to coups d’état. Stat. Politics Policy 2023, 14, 331–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urdal, H. A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence. Int. Stud. Q. 2006, 50, 607–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yair, O.; Miodownik, D. Youth bulge and civil war: Why a country’s share of young adults explains only non-ethnic wars. Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 2016, 33, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cincotta, R.; Weber, H. Youthful age structures and the risks of revolutionary and separatist conflicts. In Global Political Demography: The Politics of Population Change; Goerres, A., Vanhuysse, P., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2021; pp. 57–92. [Google Scholar]
- National Intelligence Council. Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds; Office of the Director of National Intelligence: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
- Malmberg, B.; Lindh, T. Forecasting Global Income Growth Using Age-structural Projections. In Age-Structural Transitions: Challenges for Development; Pool, I., Wong, L.R., Vilquin, E., Eds.; Committee for International Cooperation in National Research in Demography: Paris, France, 2006; pp. 60–82. [Google Scholar]
- Leahy, E. Beginning the demographic transition: Very young and youthful age structures. Environ. Change Secur. Proj. Rep. 2008, 13, 40–47. Available online: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/ECSPReport13_Leahy.pdf (accessed on 14 December 2023).
- Cilliers, J. Harnessing and Advancing Africa’s Demographic Dividend; WRR Working Paper, No. 70; Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR): The Hague, The Netherlands, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population to 2300; ST/ESA/SER.A/236; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Freedom House. Country and Territory Ratings and Statuses, 1973–2020; Freedom House: Washington, DC, USA, 2025; Available online: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world (accessed on 12 May 2025).
- World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups; IBRD: Washington, DC, USA, 2025; Available online: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups (accessed on 12 May 2025).
- Menard, S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]



Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Cincotta, R. Becoming a Net Receiver of International Migrants: An Age-Structural Model of the Shift to Persistently Positive Net Migration Rates. Populations 2026, 2, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/populations2010009
Cincotta R. Becoming a Net Receiver of International Migrants: An Age-Structural Model of the Shift to Persistently Positive Net Migration Rates. Populations. 2026; 2(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/populations2010009
Chicago/Turabian StyleCincotta, Richard. 2026. "Becoming a Net Receiver of International Migrants: An Age-Structural Model of the Shift to Persistently Positive Net Migration Rates" Populations 2, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/populations2010009
APA StyleCincotta, R. (2026). Becoming a Net Receiver of International Migrants: An Age-Structural Model of the Shift to Persistently Positive Net Migration Rates. Populations, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/populations2010009

