Next Article in Journal
Gibberellin (GA3) and Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O) Reduce Seeds per Fruit and Increase Fruit Quality in Bac Son Mandarin Fruit
Previous Article in Journal
Five Important Seeds in Traditional Medicine, and Pharmacological Benefits
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Seeds
Volume 2
Issue 3
10.3390/seeds2030023
seeds-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Climate Change during Cretaceous/Paleogene as a Driving Force for the Evolutionary Radiation of Physical Dormancy in Fabaceae

by
Ganesh K. Jaganathan
1,*,† and
Keith Berry
2,†
1
Germplasm Conservation Laboratory, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
2
Science Department, Hoehne Re-3 School District, Hoehne, CO 81046, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Seeds 2023, 2(3), 309-317; https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds2030023
Submission received: 31 May 2023 / Revised: 18 July 2023 / Accepted: 20 July 2023 / Published: 25 July 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Physical dormancy (PY) due to a water-impermeable seed/fruit coat is one of the characteristic features of many species of Fabaceae; however, the timing and context of the evolution of this trait are poorly understood. In this investigation, fossil and molecular data are used to constrain the timing of the evolution of PY. The phylogenetic reconstruction programs GB-to-TNT and BEAUTi/BEAST are used to create chloroplast gene-based (rbcL and matK) phylogenies of taxa with well-represented fossil records. PY and non-dormancy are mapped to the terminals of the phylogeny, and ancestral states are reconstructed using parsimony. The initial evolution of PY in Fabaceae is reconstructed to have occurred sometime in the interval between divergence from Polygalaceae (late Campanian) to the diversification of crown-group Fabaceae (late Paleocene) when Fabaceae is known to have undergone multiple whole genome duplication (WGD) events across the Cretaceous/Paleogene (K/Pg) boundary. As in Nelumbo, another taxon with PY, Fabaceae may have developed PY in association with climatic change and WGD across the K/Pg boundary. The evolution of PY in association with WGD at the K/Pg boundary is an intriguing hypothesis that requires further investigation.

1. Introduction

Impermeable seed/fruit coat, i.e., physical dormancy (PY), is only known to occur in several genera of 19 modern-day angiosperm families [1]. In contrast, seeds with physiological dormancy (PD) resulting from the inability of the embryo to elongate either because of the innate constraint or the thick endocarps preventing elongation and/or hormonal imbalance is the most abundant type in spermatophytes [1,2]. Compelling evidence suggests that PY is the most recent form of dormancy and evolved from PD [3,4]. This view is further supported by the fact that a few species have physical and physiological dormancy, i.e., combinational dormancy (PY+PD) [1,5]. Despite the clear recognition of PY more than 100 years ago [6], the evolutionary origins of PY have been largely debated. Several factors claimed to have acted as the selective force behind the evolution of this trait: (1) high temperatures associated with fire episodes [7]; (2) acidic environment in the animal gut during endozoochory [8]; (3) avoiding the risk of catching and dispersing by predators, i.e., the crypsis hypothesis [9,10]; (4) surviving post-dispersal deterioration [11]. However, support for these factors as evolutionary forces behind PY evolution is anecdotal [12,13,14,15]. An alternative perspective is that PY evolved as a response to climatic changes such as cooling climate across the K/Pg boundary that occurred during the Cretaceous/Paleogene, presumably due to the K/Pg transition [16,17].
Among those taxa known to have evolved PY during the K/Pg transition is Nelumbo, which evolved PY in association with whole genome duplication (WGD) at or near the K/Pg boundary [18,19]. Indeed, Wu et al. [20] observed in a recent gene ontology analysis that 493 gene families retained duplicated genes from six or more independent WGD’s across the K/Pg boundary, including those for abscisic acid (ABA) signaling (i.e., ABA transcription factors) in Fabaceae and other angiosperm taxa, such as Nelumbo [21,22,23]. As with the study by Wu et al. [20], Shi et al. [19] specifically attributed the evolution of seed dormancy in Nelumbo to WGD at or near the K/Pg boundary. N. nucifera exhibit WGD and the longest-lived seeds (1300 y) known, with seed longevity greater than a millennium [24,25].
PY is a characteristic seed trait of many Fabaceae occurring in all sub-families; however, the timing, context, and evolution of this trait remain enigmatic [1,4]. Fabaceae is known to have exhibited multiple WGD events across the K/Pg boundary [26], and some researchers have demonstrated that it is likely PY evolved in conjunction with WGD in this group [27]. Until recently, the oldest fossils of Fabaceae were regarded to be late Paleocene in age, ca. 58–56 Ma [26,28,29]. The oldest known fossils of Fabaceae were recently discovered to be slightly younger than the K/Pg boundary [29] and late Campanian in age, ca. 73.5 Ma, respectively [30].
Surprisingly, the timing and context of the evolution of PY in relation to these fossil lineages remain equivocal. Here, we used fossil records and molecular data to constrain the timing of the evolution of PY. Previously, molecular phylogenetics has been used in evolutionary studies of plants and plant structure evolution [31,32,33]. In particular, parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of the plastid matK and trnL intron sequences have been used to show the early branching of the papilionoid clade. However, the application of these methods for seed traits is only recently gaining momentum [34,35]. Thus, the important objective of this work is to unequivocally place the evolution of PY in the context of the evolutionary radiation across the K/Pg boundary by using Fabaceae as a model family. In doing so, we articulate that climate drying during and following the Cretaceous/Paleogene acted as the driving force for the radiation of PY.

2. Methods and Materials

Ribulose-1, 5-biphosphate carboxylate/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL), and maturase K (matK) chloroplast gene sequences for taxa with fossil records were drawn from GenBank, as these gene sequences have previously been used to investigate phylogenetic relationships among Fabaceae with fossil records (Supplementary Table S1, [28,36]). Sequences were aligned using Muscle v. 3.8.31 [37] and subsequently manually checked for alignment. Genbank-to-Tree Analysis Using New Technology [38,39] was used to create FASTA files, which were dually uploaded in Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis Utility (BEAUTi) and Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis Sampling Trees (BEAST), v. 2.6.5 [40] and TNT v. 1.5 [39]. As divergence time estimates for major clades in the Fabaceae are well constrained by previous investigations [26,28,36,41], this investigation did not incorporate these priors into phylogenetic reconstruction and divergence time estimation. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) chain length was set at 20,000,000 (10% burn-in) based on Tracer v. 1.7.2 [42] results. The program Tree Annotator [42] was used to create a maximum clade credibility tree, with burn-in and posterior probability established from analyzing the results of Tracer v. 1.7.2. PY and ND or PD were mapped to terminal taxa in the maximum clade credibility tree by creating a separate character matrix and reconstructing ancestral states using parsimony in Mesquite v. 3.61 [43]. Phylogenetic analysis also was performed using TNT, and PY and ND or PD were subsequently mapped to the molecular phylogeny by appending an additional character to the molecular dataset. Taxa with fossil records known to exhibit ND (water-permeable) seeds include Polygalaceae, Diplotropis, Machaerium, and Tipuana [1,44]. PY has been well demonstrated in the other lineages [1,45,46,47].

3. Data and Results

ND occurred in some lineages of Fabaceae with fossil records, including Diplotropis, Machaerium, and Tipuana, during the Cenozoic (Figure 1 and Figure 2). On the basis of the fossil record, the divergence between Fabaceae and Polygalaceae occurred during the late Campanian with a subsequent, late Paleocene diversification. When mapped onto the molecular phylogeny of lineages with well-preserved fossil records, PY evolved once during this temporal interval, when Fabaceae is known to have undergone one or more WGD events in multiple angiosperm lineages across the K/Pg boundary (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The evolution of PY is bracketed by two probable WGD events.

4. Discussion

Despite the lack of strong evidence for WGD at the base of every clade, several present-day Fabaceae species are relicts of polyploidy [48,49]. However, several lines of evidence indicate that polyploidy events in Fabaceae possibly led to the evolution of the complex modern symbiotic rhizobial nodule and radiation of sub-families near the K/Pg boundary [50]. A recent study by Koenen et al. [41] revealed that multiple WGD events occurred in Fabaceae at or near the K/Pg boundary, which is when PY is projected to have evolved in this family (Figure 1 and Figure 2). These results agree with the contemporary perspective that PY evolved in conjunction with WGD in Fabaceae [27].
Our finding that PY evolved near the K/Pg boundaries is concordant with previous investigations, such as those which link the evolution of PY in Nelumbo with WGD at the K/Pg boundary [19]. On the basis of the fossil record, the oldest fossils of Fabaceae appeared ~73.5 Ma [30] with subsequent radiation of crown Fabaceae by ~58–56 Ma [26,28]. Lavin et al. [28] gave the following lineages as well constrained by the fossil record: (1) the Cercis clade (ca. 34 Ma), represented by Cercis/Bauhinia, (2) the Hymenaea/Tessmania clade (ca. 34 Ma), (3) the Mezoneuron clade (ca. 34 Ma), represented by Caesalpinia/Haematoxylon, (4) the Acacia clade (ca. 15 Ma), represented by Acacia and Inga/Mimosa, (5) the Papilionoideae clade (ca. 55 Ma), represented by Amburana/Cercidium/Glycine, (6) the Stypholobium clade (ca. 40 Ma), (7) the Diplotropis clade (ca. 56 Ma), represented by Diplotropis/Spartium, (8) the Machaerium clade (ca. 40 Ma), represented by Aeschynomeae/Machaerium, (9) the Tipuana clade (ca. 10 Ma), represented by Tipuana/Maraniona, and (10) the Robinia clade (ca. 34 Ma), represented by Robinia/Coursetia. Additional constraints discussed by Bello et al. [36] include a Campanian/Maastrichtian divergence between Polygalaceae and Fabaceae, coupled with additions to the oldest fossil records of the latter [29,30]. Detailed discussions of the morphological apomorphies that support the recognition of these lineages in the fossil record, which is beyond the scope of this paper, can be found elsewhere [36,51]. During this time, WGD events occurred at or near the K/Pg boundary with perhaps one pan-legume WGD occurring on the stem separating Polygalaceae from crown Fabaceae [26].
Lyson et al. [29] speculated that the evolution and diversification of Fabaceae were associated with endozoochory by mammals, a perspective shared by Huegele and Manchester [52]. This inference appears to support the contention of Temple, S.A. [8] that PY evolved in response to the acidic environment associated with wind endozoochory by mammals; however, these results are contested by the earlier evolution of Fabaceae, which is now known to have preceded the post-K/Pg radiation of mammals [30].
Contemporary K/Pg asteroid impact models predict a multi-year episode of drastically reduced precipitation and sub-freezing conditions associated with sunlight-blocking aerosols produced by the Chicxulub impact [53,54,55,56]. Previously linked to the differential survival of plants with varying seed strategies, e.g., recalcitrant vs. orthodox seeds [57] as discussed by an emerging literature [34,35], these K/Pg climate models suggest that PY may have permitted the survival or post-K/Pg diversification of Fabaceae, as has already been postulated for Nelumbo [19,34,35]. If this perspective is correct, then PY may represent an exaptation (Sensu [58]) for plant survival across the K/Pg boundary, as climate-related dormancy has similarly been linked to fortuitous survival across the K/Pg boundary in diatoms [59]. This perspective differs from that of other researchers, who have posited that the evolution of root nodules associated with WGD may have permitted the survival and diversification of Fabaceae across the K/Pg boundary [60,61] but is consistent with the contemporary perspective of Van de Peer, Y. et al. [62], who suggested seed dormancy and ABA signaling were traits selected among vascular plants during the K/Pg transition.
Whilst linking the evolutionary traits, particularly the ones like impermeable coats with the specific time frame, is an obscene paradox, numerous traits have been considered to evolve during Cretaceous, which favored the early diversification of angiosperms [63,64]. Despite the unsettled debate about the evolution of angiosperms, growing evidence points the origin to Upper Triassic (350 mya) and radiations occurring throughout the Jurassic and particularly Lower Cretaceous about 80–60 mya [65,66]. Climate data available prior to the K/Pg event suggest that the cool and wetter climate prevailed from the inception of angiosperms favored desiccation-sensitive, i.e., recalcitrant, seeds. Such climatic conditions were present in the Western Interior of North America during the late Maastrichtian. Fossil records and climatic data indicate that prior to the K/pg event ancestors of modern-day rainforest species belonging to families Annonaceae, Arecaceae, Meliaceae, and Myristicaceae were common until Paleocene-Eocene [67,68], during which the climate warmed 5–7 °C, resulting in species diversification, specifically the wide colonization of Fabaceae [69,70].
The recent finding of the oldest Fabaceae fossil from the Olmos Formation undoubtedly extends the radiation of this family to the Cretaceous. The climate of the Olmos Formation during the Cretaceous appears to be wet with rare aridity or drought [71], plausibly favoring a water-permeable coat. Subsequent movement of Fabaceae species to dry forests or climate becoming drier might possibly have led to the evolution of water-impermeable coats. This is in agreement with Rubio de Casas et al. [72] who showed that Fabaceae species in wetter regions were large and non-dormant, seasonally dry climates impose pressure to develop impermeable coats. Multiple WGDs in Fabaceae species explain the possible evolution of impermeable coats independently in some species and subsequently lost. Support for this view comes from Lavin et al. [28], as those authors showed that most of the lineages with fossil records available come from tropical dry forests (also see above). In the conceptual model proposed by Van Staden et al. [16] for the evolution of impermeable seed coats in Fabaceae, the ancestral legumes had water permeable coats with the non-dormant embryo, which gave rise to two independent traits due to increasing in aridity: (1) development of pleurogram and PY and (2) development of hilum and PY. The oldest fossil record with explicit features (i.e., a palisade layer in the endocarp) showing the possibility of PY comes from 43 Ma extinct fossil records of extinct Rhus rooseae (Anacardiaceae) [73]. Furthermore, fossil records of orders of all 18 families in which PY occur are exceptionally restricted to the Cretaceous or early Paleogene [74,75], implying a strong association between dry (and hot) climate and evolution of PY [19,76], but this warrants further study from the WGD perspective [19,62]. In any case, the association of WGD and the evolution of PY in the context of climatic factors at the K/Pg boundary in at least two lineages of vascular plants (Fabaceae and Nelumbo) suggests a convergent evolution or a congruent pattern of vascular plant evolution across the K/Pg boundary and a general role for WGD in plant macroevolution, i.e., as an exaptation for fortuitous survival during the K/Pg impact winter [59], which has generally been lacking [77,78].
Is there any other fossil evidence for the proliferation of plant lineages that have undergone WGD at the K/Pg boundary? Lomax et al. [77] suggested that this was not the case, countering the results of numerous genomic studies [60,62,79]. However, it is important to note that at least two stem representatives of polyploid crown genera, including Stenochlaena (Blechnaceae) [80,81] and Cyclocarya (Juglandaceae) [82], are known to have emerged immediately above the K/Pg boundary in the strata of western North America [29,34,83]. Examples of duplicated genes retained across the K/Pg boundary in both Fabaceae and Stenochlaena include chalcone isomerase (chi1/2) genes, which also function in seed coat traits and other stress-related factors [84,85,86,87]. Clearly, this is a topic worth further investigation.

5. Conclusions

The timing and context of the evolution of PY in Fabaceae have remained enigmatic. Mapping the evolution of this trait onto a molecular phylogeny of taxa with well-preserved fossil records indicates that PY evolved sometime between the divergence of Fabaceae from Polygalaceae (late Campanian) and prior to the diversification of crown Fabaceae (late Paleocene), an interval of time that overlaps with an episode of multiple putative WGD events in Fabaceae and other angiosperm families. This appears to parallel the pattern observed in another taxon, Nelumbo, which also appears to have evolved PY in association with WGD and the K/Pg transition. Additional studies are needed to determine whether this pattern is congruent with that observed among other lineages of vascular plants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/seeds2030023/s1, Table S1. Muscle v. 3.8.31- aligned rbcL and matK GenBank chloroplast gene sequences for lineages with a fossil record (based on Lavin et al. [28]).

Author Contributions

G.K.J. and K.B. have contributed equally with the conception of the idea, writing. K.B. analyzed the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support by National Science Foundation China (NSFC) with grant numbers 31750110474 and 32001119 to carry out studies on physical dormancy is gratefully acknowledged. Funders have no role in study design, data analysis, and the way the data is presented.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data used in this work are presented as a figure or Supplementary Materials (Table S1).

Acknowledgments

We thank Patrick Herendeen for their discussion and comment on the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. The great diversity in kinds of seed dormancy: A revision of the Nikolaeva–Baskin classification system for primary seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2021, 31, 249–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Willis, C.G.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Auld, J.R.; Venable, D.L.; Cavender-Bares, J.; Donohue, K.; Rubio de Casas, R.; Group, N.G.W. The evolution of seed dormancy: Environmental cues, evolutionary hubs, and diversification of the seed plants. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Graeber, K.; Nakabayashi, K.; Leubner-Metzger, G. Development of Dormancy. In Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences, 2nd ed.; Thomas, B., Murray, B.G., Murphy, D.J., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 483–489. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C. A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci. Res. 2004, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Crocker, W. Mechanics of dormancy in seeds. Am. J. Bot. 1916, 3, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Keeley, J.E.; Pausas, J.G.; Rundel, P.W.; Bond, W.J.; Bradstock, R.A. Fire as an evolutionary pressure shaping plant traits. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Temple, S.A. Plant-animal mutualism: Coevolution with dodo leads to near extinction of plant. Science 1977, 197, 885–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Paulsen, T.R.; Colville, L.; Daws, M.I.; Eliassen, S.; Högstedt, G.; Kranner, I.; Thompson, K.; Vandvik, V. The crypsis hypothesis explained: A reply to Jayasuriya et al. (2015). Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paulsen, T.; Colville, L.; Kranner, I.; Daws, M.; Högstedt, G.; Vandvik, V.; Thompson, K. Physical dormancy in seeds: A game of hide and seek? New Phytol. 2013, 198, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brancalion, P.H.S.; Novembre, A.D.L.C.; Rodrigues, R.R.; Filho, J.M. Dormancy as exaptation to protect mimetic seeds against deterioration before dispersal. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jaganathan, G.K. Crypsis hypothesis as an explanation for evolution of impermeable coats in seeds is anecdotal. Ecol. Res. 2018, 33, 857–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jaganathan, G.; Yule, K.; Liu, B. On the evolutionary and ecological value of breaking physical dormancy by endozoochory. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2016, 22, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jaganathan, G.K. Are wildfires an adapted ecological cue breaking physical dormancy in the Mediterranean basin? Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 25, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jayasuriya, K.; Athugala, Y.S.; Wijayasinghe, M.M.; Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C.; Mahadevan, N. The crypsis hypothesis: A stenopic view of the selective factors in the evolution of physical dormancy in seeds. Seed Sci. Res. 2015, 25, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Van Staden, J.; Manning, J.C.; Kelly, K.M. Legumes seeds: The structure function equation. In Advances in Legume Biology; Stirton, C.H., Zarucchi, J.L., Eds.; Missouri Bot Garden: St. Louis, MO, USA, 1989; pp. 417–450. [Google Scholar]
  17. Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C.; Li, X. Taxonomy, Anatomy and Evolution of Physical Dormancy in Seeds. Plant Species Biol. 2000, 15, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Sun, F.; Shi, C.; Liu, X.; Peng, J.; Chen, W.; Huang, X.; Cheng, S.; et al. The sacred lotus genome provides insights into the evolution of flowering plants. Plant J. 2013, 76, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, T.; Rahmani, R.; Gugger, P.; Wang, M.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.-Z.; Van de Peer, Y.; Marchal, K.; Chen, J. Distinct Expression and Methylation Patterns for Genes with Different Fates following a Single Whole-Genome Duplication in Flowering Plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 2394–2413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, S.; Han, B.; Jiao, Y. Genetic Contribution of Paleopolyploidy to Adaptive Evolution in Angiosperms. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bolingue, W.; Vu, B.; Leprince, O.; Buitink, J. Characterization of dormancy behaviour in seeds of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Seed Sci. Res. 2010, 20, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Smýkal, P.; Vernoud, V.; Blair, M.W.; Soukup, A.; Thompson, R.D. The role of the testa during development and in establishment of dormancy of the legume seed. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 351. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen, H.; Chu, P.; Zhou, Y.-L.; Ding, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Jiang, L.-W.; Huang, S.-Z. Ectopic expression of NnPER1, a Nelumbo nucifera 1-cysteine peroxiredoxin antioxidant, enhances seed longevity and stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2016, 88, 608–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Al-Mssallem, I.S.; Hu, S.; Zhang, X.; Lin, Q.; Liu, W.; Tan, J.; Yu, X.; Liu, J.; Pan, L.; Zhang, T.; et al. Genome sequence of the date palm Phoenix dactylifera L. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sano, N.; Rajjou, L.; North, H.; Debeaujon, I.; Marion-Poll, A.; Seo, M. Staying Alive: Molecular Aspects of Seed Longevity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 57, pcv186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koenen, E.; Ojeda Alayon, D.; Bakker, F.; Wieringa, J.; Kidner, C.; Hardy, O.; Pennington, R.; Herendeen, P.; Bruneau, A.; Hughes, C. The Origin of the Legumes is a Complex Paleopolyploid Phylogenomic Tangle Closely Associated with the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) Mass Extinction Event. Syst. Biol. 2021, 70, 508–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Marques, A.; Buijs, G.; Ligterink, W.; Hilhorst, H. Evolutionary ecophysiology of seed desiccation sensitivity. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lavin, M.; Herendeen, P.S.; Wojciechowski, M.F. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54, 575–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lyson, T.R.; Miller, I.M.; Bercovici, A.D.; Weissenburger, K.; Fuentes, A.J.; Clyde, W.C.; Hagadorn, J.W.; Butrim, M.J.; Johnson, K.R.; Fleming, R.F. Exceptional continental record of biotic recovery after the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction. Science 2019, 366, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Centeno-González, N.K.; Martínez-Cabrera, H.I.; Porras-Múzquiz, H.; Estrada-Ruiz, E. Late Campanian fossil of a legume fruit supports Mexico as a center of Fabaceae radiation. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nascimento, F.F.; Reis, M.D.; Yang, Z. A biologist’s guide to Bayesian phylogenetic analysis. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 1446–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Smith, S.D. Using phylogenetics to detect pollinator-mediated floral evolution. New Phytol. 2010, 188, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wickett, N.J.; Mirarab, S.; Nguyen, N.; Warnow, T.; Carpenter, E.; Matasci, N.; Ayyampalayam, S.; Barker, M.S.; Burleigh, J.G.; Gitzendanner, M.A. Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4859–E4868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Berry, K. The first plants to recolonize western North America following the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction event. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2020, 182, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Berry, K. Seed traits linked to differential survival of plants during the Cretaceous/Paleogene impact winter. Acta Palaeobot. 2020, 60, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bello, M.A.; Bruneau, A.; Forest, F.; Hawkins, J.A. Elusive Relationships within Order Fabales: Phylogenetic Analyses Using matK and rbcL Sequence Data. Syst. Bot. 2009, 34, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goloboff, P.A.; Catalano, S.A. GB-to-TNT: Facilitating creation of matrices from GenBank and diagnosis of results in TNT. Cladistics 2012, 28, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goloboff, P.A.; Catalano, S.A. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 2016, 32, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bouckaert, R.; Vaughan, T.G.; Barido-Sottani, J.; Duchêne, S.; Fourment, M.; Gavryushkina, A.; Heled, J.; Jones, G.; Kühnert, D.; De Maio, N. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2019, 15, e1006650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koenen, E.; Ojeda, D.; Steeves, R.; Migliore, J.; Bakker, F.; Wieringa, J.; Kidner, C.; Hardy, O.; Pennington, R.; Bruneau, A. Large-scale genomic sequence data resolve the deepest divergences in the legume phylogeny and support a near-simultaneous evolutionary origin of all six subfamilies. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1355–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rambaut, A.; Drummond, A.J. TreeView v. 1.7.2 and TreeAnnotator v. 2.6.4; Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh, UK, 2021; Available online: https://beast.community/treeannotator (accessed on 6 August 2022).
  43. Maddison, W.P.; Maddison, D.R. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Available online: https://www.mesquiteproject.org (accessed on 6 August 2022).
  44. Escobar, D.F.; Silveira, F.A.; Morellato, L.P.C. Timing of seed dispersal and seed dormancy in Brazilian savanna: Two solutions to face seasonality. Ann. Bot. 2018, 121, 1197–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Travlos, I.; Economou, G.; Karamanos, A. Seed germination and seedling emergence of Spartium junceum L. in response to heat and other pre-sowing treatments. J. Agron. 2007, 6, 152. [Google Scholar]
  46. Galindez, G.; Ceccato, D.V.; Malagrina, G.M.; Pidal, B.; Chilo, G.N.; Bach, H.G.; Fortunato, R.H.; Ortega Baes, F.P. Physical seed dormancy in native legume species of Argentina. Bol. Soc. Argent. Bot. 2016, 51, 73–78. [Google Scholar]
  47. Rodríguez-Arévalo, I.; Mattana, E.; García, L.; Liu, U.; Lira, R.; Dávila, P.; Hudson, A.; Pritchard, H.W.; Ulian, T. Conserving seeds of useful wild plants in Mexico: Main issues and recommendations. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 1141–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cannon, S.B.; Ilut, D.; Farmer, A.D.; Maki, S.L.; May, G.D.; Singer, S.R.; Doyle, J.J. Polyploidy did not predate the evolution of nodulation in all legumes. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cannon, S.B.; McKain, M.R.; Harkess, A.; Nelson, M.N.; Dash, S.; Deyholos, M.K.; Peng, Y.; Joyce, B.; Stewart, C.N., Jr.; Rolf, M.; et al. Multiple Polyploidy Events in the Early Radiation of Nodulating and Nonnodulating Legumes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 32, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, R.; Jiang, K.-W.; Qi, J.; Hu, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhu, R.; Zhang, T.; Egan, A.N.; Yi, T.-S. Nuclear phylotranscriptomics and phylogenomics support numerous polyploidization events and hypotheses for the evolution of rhizobial nitrogen-fixing symbiosis in Fabaceae. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 748–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kreplak, J.; Madoui, M.-A.; Cápal, P.; Novák, P.; Labadie, K.; Aubert, G.; Bayer, P.E.; Gali, K.K.; Syme, R.A.; Main, D.; et al. A reference genome for pea provides insight into legume genome evolution. Nat Genet. 2019, 51, 1411–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huegele, I.; Manchester, S. An Early Paleocene Carpoflora from the Denver Basin of Colorado, USA, and Its Implications for Plant-Animal Interactions and Fruit Size Evolution. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2020, 181, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Schulte, P.; Alegret, L.; Arenillas, I.; Arz, J.A.; Barton, P.J.; Al, E. The Chicxulub Asteroid Impact and Mass Extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary. Science 2010, 327, 1214–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chiarenza, A.A.; Mannion, P.D.; Lunt, D.J.; Farnsworth, A.; Jones, L.A.; Kelland, S.J.; Allison, P.A. Ecological niche modelling does not support climatically-driven dinosaur diversity decline before the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chiarenza, A.A.; Farnsworth, A.; Mannion, P.D.; Lunt, D.J.; Valdes, P.J.; Morgan, J.V.; Allison, P.A. Asteroid impact, not volcanism, caused the end-Cretaceous dinosaur extinction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 17084–17093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tabor, C.R.; Bardeen, C.G.; Otto-Bliesner, B.L.; Garcia, R.R.; Toon, O.B. Causes and Climatic Consequences of the Impact Winter at the Cretaceous-Paleogene Boundary. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020, 47, e60121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Roberts, E.H. Predicting the Storage Life of Seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 1973, 1, 499–514. [Google Scholar]
  58. Gould, S.J.; Vrba, E.S. Exaptation; a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 1982, 8, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gould, S.J. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory; Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vanneste, K.; Maere, S.; Peer, Y. Tangled up in two: A burst of genome duplications at the end of the Cretaceous and the consequences for plant evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 369, 5042–5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Leebens-Mack, J.; Wickett, N.; Deyholos, M.K.; Degironimo, L.; Pires, J.C. One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants. Nature 2019, 574, 679–685. [Google Scholar]
  62. Van de Peer, Y.; Ashman, T.-L.; Soltis, P.; Soltis, D. Polyploidy: An evolutionary and ecological force in stressful times. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species; John Murray: London, UK, 1859. [Google Scholar]
  64. Linkies, A.; Graeber, K.; Knight, C.; Leubner-Metzger, G. The evolution of seeds. New Phytol. 2010, 186, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, H.-T.; Yi, T.-S.; Gao, L.-M.; Ma, P.-F.; Zhang, T.; Yang, J.-B.; Gitzendanner, M.A.; Fritsch, P.W.; Cai, J.; Luo, Y. Origin of angiosperms and the puzzle of the Jurassic gap. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sauquet, H.; Magallón, S. Key questions and challenges in angiosperm macroevolution. New Phytol. 2018, 219, 1170–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jacobs, B.F.; Herendeen, P.S. Eocene dry climate and woodland vegetation in tropical Africa reconstructed from fossil leaves from northern Tanzania. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2004, 213, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Morley, R.J. Origin and Evolution of Tropical Rain Forests; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  69. Turner, S.K. Constraints on the onset duration of the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018, 376, 20170082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Tosso, F.; Hardy, O.J.; Doucet, J.-L.; Daïnou, K.; Kaymak, E.; Migliore, J. Evolution in the Amphi-Atlantic tropical genus Guibourtia (Fabaceae, Detarioideae), combining NGS phylogeny and morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018, 120, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Martínez-Cabrera, H.I.; Estrada-Ruiz, E. Wood anatomy reveals high theoretical hydraulic conductivity and low resistance to vessel implosion in a Cretaceous fossil forest from northern Mexico. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e108866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  72. Rubio de Casas, R.; Willis, C.G.; Pearse, W.D.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Cavender-Bares, J. Global biogeography of seed dormancy is determined by seasonality and seed size: A case study in the legumes. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 1527–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Manchester, S. Fruits and Seeds of the Middle Eocene Nut Beds Flora, Clarno Formation, Oregon. Palaeontogr. Am. 1994, 58, 205. [Google Scholar]
  74. Muller, J. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 1981, 47, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Endress, P.K. Reproductive structures and phylogenetic significance of extant primitive angiosperms. Plant Syst. Evol. 1986, 152, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chai, M.; Zhou, C.; Molina, I.; Fu, C.; Nakashima, J.; Li, G.; Zhang, W.; Park, J.; Tang, Y.; Jiang, Q.; et al. A class II KNOX gene, KNOX4, controls seed physical dormancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6997–7002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lomax, B.H.; Hilton, J.; Bateman, R.M.; Upchurch, G.R.; Lake, J.A.; Leitch, I.J.; Cromwell, A.; Knight, C.A. Reconstructing relative genome size of vascular plants through geological time. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 636–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Clark, J.; Donoghue, P. Whole-Genome Duplication and Plant Macroevolution. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fawcett, J.A.; Maere, S.; Van de Peer, Y. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5737–5742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gasper, A.L.; Almeida, T.; Dittrich, V.; Smith, A.; Salino, A. Molecular phylogeny of the fern family Blechnaceae (Polypodiales) with a revised genus-level treatment. Cladistics 2017, 33, 429–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, Z.-Z. Evolution by Ancient Gene and Genome Duplication in Hexapods and Land Plants. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  82. Luo, M.-C.; You, F.M.; Li, P.; Wang, J.-R.; Zhu, T.; Dandekar, A.M.; Leslie, C.A.; Aradhya, M.; McGuire, P.E.; Dvorak, J. Synteny analysis in Rosids with a walnut physical map reveals slow genome evolution in long-lived woody perennials. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wolfe, J.A.; Upchurch, G.R. Leaf assemblages across the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the Raton Basin, New Mexico and Colorado. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 5096–5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shimada, N. A cluster of genes encodes the two types of chalcone isomerase involved in the biosynthesis of general flavonoids and legume-specific 5-deoxy(iso)flavonoids in Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Przysiecka, Ł.; Książkiewicz, M.; Wolko, B.; Naganowska, B. Structure, expression profile and phylogenetic inference of chalcone isomerase-like genes from the narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) genome. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cheng, A.-X.; Zhang, X.; Han, X.-J.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Gao, S.; Liu, C.-J.; Lou, H.-X. Identification of chalcone isomerase in the basal land plants reveals an ancient evolution of enzymatic cyclization activity for synthesis of flavonoids. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 909–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ni, R.; Zhu, T.-T.; Zhang, X.-S.; Wang, P.-Y.; Sun, C.-J.; Qiao, Y.-N.; Lou, H.-X.; Cheng, A.-X. Identification and evolutionary analysis of chalcone isomerase fold proteins in ferns. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 71, 290–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Seeds 02 00023 g001
Figure 1. Strict consensus tree produced using TNT v. 1.5 with seed dormancy traits [non-dormancy (ND) or physiological dormancy (PD) and physical dormancy (PY)] mapped to terminals. Circles indicate putative whole genome duplication events from Koenen et al. [26,41]. Note that divergence between Polygalaceae (ND) [1] and Fabaceae (predominately PY) is estimated to have occurred in the Campanian/Maastrichtian on the basis of previous investigations [26,28,36,41].
Figure 1. Strict consensus tree produced using TNT v. 1.5 with seed dormancy traits [non-dormancy (ND) or physiological dormancy (PD) and physical dormancy (PY)] mapped to terminals. Circles indicate putative whole genome duplication events from Koenen et al. [26,41]. Note that divergence between Polygalaceae (ND) [1] and Fabaceae (predominately PY) is estimated to have occurred in the Campanian/Maastrichtian on the basis of previous investigations [26,28,36,41].
Seeds 02 00023 g001
Seeds 02 00023 g002
Figure 2. Maximum clade credibility tree generated using BEAUTi and BEAST v. 2.6.5 with seed dormancy traits [non-dormancy (ND)] or [physiological dormancy (PD) and physical dormancy (PY)] mapped to terminals. Circles indicate putative whole genome duplication events from Koenen et al. [26,41]. Note that divergence between Polygalaceae (ND) [1] and Fabaceae (predominately PY) is estimated to have occurred in the Campanian/Maastrichtian on the basis of previous investigations [26,28,36,41].
Figure 2. Maximum clade credibility tree generated using BEAUTi and BEAST v. 2.6.5 with seed dormancy traits [non-dormancy (ND)] or [physiological dormancy (PD) and physical dormancy (PY)] mapped to terminals. Circles indicate putative whole genome duplication events from Koenen et al. [26,41]. Note that divergence between Polygalaceae (ND) [1] and Fabaceae (predominately PY) is estimated to have occurred in the Campanian/Maastrichtian on the basis of previous investigations [26,28,36,41].
Seeds 02 00023 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jaganathan, G.K.; Berry, K. Climate Change during Cretaceous/Paleogene as a Driving Force for the Evolutionary Radiation of Physical Dormancy in Fabaceae. Seeds 2023, 2, 309-317. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds2030023

AMA Style

Jaganathan GK, Berry K. Climate Change during Cretaceous/Paleogene as a Driving Force for the Evolutionary Radiation of Physical Dormancy in Fabaceae. Seeds. 2023; 2(3):309-317. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds2030023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jaganathan, Ganesh K., and Keith Berry. 2023. "Climate Change during Cretaceous/Paleogene as a Driving Force for the Evolutionary Radiation of Physical Dormancy in Fabaceae" Seeds 2, no. 3: 309-317. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds2030023

APA Style

Jaganathan, G. K., & Berry, K. (2023). Climate Change during Cretaceous/Paleogene as a Driving Force for the Evolutionary Radiation of Physical Dormancy in Fabaceae. Seeds, 2(3), 309-317. https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds2030023

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop