1. Introduction
Child obesity has become one of the most challenging public health problems, and this issue is no longer a patent of developed countries. Many developing countries are also at risk of the increasing prevalence of childhood obesity.
With the popularization of electronic media products such as television, computers, and mobile phones, the opportunities for children to access electronic products continue to increase. Watching TV, playing with computers, and using mobile phones have become an indispensable part of children’s lives. However, watching TV, using computers, mobile phones and other screen devices for a long time has a great impact on childhood obesity [
1]. However, the superimposed effects of screen time and outdoor activities on childhood overweight and obesity still lack the corresponding research [
2].
2. Materials and Methods
This study adopted a random cluster sampling method and selected all 3–6-year-old children from four kindergartens in Hangzhou, a city in eastern China, as the research subjects. A total of 1422 children were tested, including 716 boys and 706 girls. The average age was 4.48 ± 0.91 years. The research subjects were divided into seven age-based groups with the step of half a year: 3 years old means 3–3.4 years old; 3.5 years old means 3.5–3.9 years old; 4 years old means 4–4.4 years old; 4.5 years old means 4.5–4.9 years old; 5 years old means 5–5.4 years old; 5.5 years old means 5.5–5.9 years old; 6 years old means 6–6.5 years old.
We adopted the questionnaire survey method. From April to June 2019, after the children’s afternoon school was over, the team members who received uniform training gathered the caregivers of the children surveyed in the classroom, and explained the survey purpose and requirement to the caregivers. And all the caregivers finisher the questionnaire on a voluntary basis after being informed. In this process, the relevant research personnel would remain ready to address the doubts of the parents in the process of filling in the questionnaire on time. After the questionnaires would be filled, the relevant survey personnel would collect them on the spot to ensure that there were no missing items.
The questionnaire for this research adopted the content of “The Fifth National Fitness Monitoring Work Plan (Kindergarten Part)”. The investigated family factors related to children’s overweight and obesity included whether the child participated in special sports training courses, the reproductive age of the parents, the education level of the parents, the parents’ occupations, whether the parents regularly exercised and the child caregivers. The education level was divided into three levels: junior high school and below, high school (including technical secondary school), university (including junior college and above); child caregivers were divided into parents, the elderly at home, and others (relatives, nanny, etc.)
The outdoor activity time aspect of this study required the parents to carefully recall the average daily outdoor activity time in the past week when their children were at home. According to the children’s physical activity guide, the average daily outdoor activity time was divided into “>2 h” and “≤2 h” [
3].
The screen time aspect of this study required the parents to recall the average daily time their children spent watching TV, using mobile phones, tablets, computers, video games, etc. in the past week. According to the World Health Organization and China’s recommendations, children’s daily screen time should not exceed 1 h. The standard divides the average daily screen time into “<1 h” and “≥1 h” [
2].
3. Results
3.1. Physical Characteristics of the Children
Table 1 shows that with the increase of age, the height and weight of children show a continuous increasing trend, and there are gender differences in height and weight of children 3.5 years old and later (
p < 0.05).
There is no gender difference in the BMI of children before the age of 4, but from the age of 4, the BMI of children begins to have gender differences, and the BMI of boys is higher than that of girls (
Table 2). Overall, the proportion of boys who are overweight and obese is higher than that of girls (
Table 3).
3.2. Outdoor Activity Time and the Children’s Overweight and Obesity
Table 4 shows that outdoor activity time has an impact on the overweight and obesity rate of boys (X
2 = 5.795,
p = 0.016). But it has no effect on girls.
After adjusting for children’s age, parent’s education level, screen time and other factors, the risk of overweight and obesity for children with outdoor activities ≤ 2 h/d is 1.734 times that of children with outdoor activity> 2 h/d (95%CI: 1.178–2.552), of which boys are 2.050 times (95%CI: 1.252–3.357), and girls are 1.472 times (95%CI: 0.785–2.761); outdoor activity time ≤ 2 h/d is a risk factor for overweight and obesity in boys (
p < 0.05,
Table 5).
3.3. Screen Time and the Children’s Overweight and Obesity
As shown in
Table 6 and
Table 7, taking screen time <1 h/d as the dividing standard, after adjusting for children’s age, parent’s education level, outdoor activity time and other factors, screen time ≥ 1 h/d children with overweight and obesity risk screen time <1 h/d children’s 1.639 times (95%CI: 1.272–2.113), among which boys are 1.474 times (95%CI: 1.057–2.057), girls are 1.676 times (95%CI: 1.119–2.511); screen time ≥1 h/d is for boys Risk factors for overweight and obesity in girls (
p < 0.05).
4. Discussion
Studies have shown that the occurrence of myopia is related to the decrease in outdoor activities and the increase in TV, computer and mobile phone time [
4]. This study shows that outdoor activity time and screen time increase the risk of overweight and obesity in 3–6-year-old children. Relevant studies have found that parental education has a certain influence on childhood obesity. It is believed that the incidence of obesity in children with mothers with low education is more common than that with mothers with high education [
5]. This study found that mother’s education level has no effect on childhood obesity, but father’s education level has a significant impact on childhood obesity. The related mechanisms need to be investigated further. Therefore, when we studied the OR value of screen time and outdoor activity time with regard to the incidence of overweight and obesity in children, we adjusted the impact of parent’s education and age (
Table 5 and
Table 7).
We must consider the impact of lockdown measures instituted during the COVID-19 pandemic on childhood obesity and myopia.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, W.Y.; methodology, S.M.; writing—review and editing, J.Z.; supervision, W.Y.; project administration, G.X.; funding acquisition, S.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by grant No. 18YJA890017 from the Humanities and Social Science Research Fund Project of the Ministry of Education of China. The authors are thankful to Zhejiang Normal University for the support.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Zhejiang Normal University (protocol code 2019032601 and date of approval is 03-26-2019).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all parents of children involved in the study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Fang, K.; Mu, M.; Liu, K. Screen time and childhood overweight/obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Care Health Dev. 2019, 45, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. Guidelines on Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep for Children under 5 Years of Age: Web Annex: Evidence Profiles; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Lipnowski, S.; Leblanc, C.M.; Society, C.P. Healthy active living: Physical activity guidelines for children and adolescents. Paediatr. Child Health 2012, 17, 209–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Alvarez-Peregrina, C.; Sánchez-Tena, M.Á.; Martinez-Perez, C. The relationship between screen and outdoor time with rates of myopia in Spanish children. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spinelli, A.; Buoncristiano, M.; Kovacs, V.A. Prevalence of severe obesity among primary school children in 21 European countries. Obes. Facts 2019, 12, 244–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1.
Subjects’ height and body weight and gender differences (M ± SD).
Table 1.
Subjects’ height and body weight and gender differences (M ± SD).
Age | Height | | Body Weight |
---|
Boys | Girls | p | Boys | Girls | p |
---|
3 | 98.78 ± 4.13 | 97.73 ± 3.57 | 0.09 | | 15.66 ± 1.85 | 15.15 ± 1.91 | 0.092 |
3.5 | 102.59 ± 4.69 | 100.24 ± 4.36 | 0.00 | | 16.46 ± 2.19 | 15.50 ± 2.22 | 0.002 |
4 | 106.01 ± 4.60 | 104.49 ± 4.19 | 0.01 | | 18.05 ± 3.45 | 16.70 ± 2.07 | 0.001 |
4.5 | 108.95 ± 4.08 | 107.99 ± 4.18 | 0.06 | | 19.40 ± 2.94 | 18.20 ± 2.61 | 0.001 |
5 | 112.69 ± 4.51 | 111.16 ± 4.17 | 0.01 | | 20.25 ± 3.12 | 19.03 ± 2.56 | 0.002 |
5.5 | 116.47 ± 4.25 | 115.20 ± 4.54 | 0.03 | | 22.02 ± 3.71 | 20.61 ± 2.69 | 0.002 |
6 | 116.77 ± 4.38 | 115.34 ± 4.43 | 0.00 | | 22.18 ± 3.35 | 20.62 ± 3.15 | 0.000 |
Total | 109.04 ± 7.33 | 107.94 ± 7.32 | 0.00 | | 19.18 ± 3.74 | 17.86 ± 3.11 | 0.000 |
Table 2.
Subjects’ BMI and gender differences (M ± SD).
Table 2.
Subjects’ BMI and gender differences (M ± SD).
Age | Boys | Girls | p |
---|
3 | 16.03 ± 1.43 | 15.83 ± 1.38 | 0.359 |
3.5 | 15.59 ± 1.37 | 15.38 ± 1.68 | 0.308 |
4 | 15.96 ± 2.05 | 15.27 ± 1.43 | 0.005 |
4.5 | 16.29 ± 1.88 | 15.57 ± 1.68 | 0.001 |
5 | 15.89 ± 1.76 | 15.38 ± 1.48 | 0.022 |
5.5 | 16.15 ± 1.85 | 15.52 ± 1.74 | 0.011 |
6 | 16.23 ± 1.98 | 15.26 ± 1.77 | 0.003 |
Total | 16.02 ± 1.79 | 15.46 ± 1.59 | 0.000 |
Table 3.
Report rates of overweight and obesity in the children of different gender groups (n, %).
Table 3.
Report rates of overweight and obesity in the children of different gender groups (n, %).
Gender | Normal Weight | Overweight and Obesity | X2 | p |
---|
Boys | 498 (69.6) | 218 (30.4) | 35.490 | 0.000 |
Girls | 586 (83.0) | 120 (17.0) |
Table 4.
Comparison of weight between the different outdoor activity time groups (n, %).
Table 4.
Comparison of weight between the different outdoor activity time groups (n, %).
Group | Normal Weight | Overweight and Obesity | X2 | p |
---|
Boys | | | | |
Outdoor activity time < 2 h/d | 402 (67.7) | 187 (32.3) | 5.795 | 0.016 |
Outdoor activity time ≥ 2 h/d | 96 (78.7) | 26 (21.3) | | |
Girls | | | | |
Outdoor activity time < 2 h/d | 504 (82.5) | 107 (17.5) | 0.854 | 0.335 |
Outdoor activity time ≥ 2 h/d | 82 (86.3) | 13 (13.7) | | |
Total | | | | |
Outdoor activity time < 2 h/d | 906 (75.2) | 299 (24.8) | 4.749 | 0.029 |
Outdoor activity time ≥ 2 h/d | 178 (82.0) | 39 (18.0) | | |
Table 5.
Logistic regression of the relationship between outdoor activity time and overweight and obesity.
Table 5.
Logistic regression of the relationship between outdoor activity time and overweight and obesity.
Independent Variable | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
---|
Boys | | |
Outdoor activity time ≥ 2 h/d | 1 | 1 |
Outdoor activity time < 2 h/d | 1.763 (1.106–2.811) * | 2.050 (1.252–3.357) * |
Girls | | |
Outdoor activity time ≥ 2 h/d | 1 | 1 |
Outdoor activity time < 2 h/d | 1.339 (0.720–2.492) | 1.472 (0.785–2.761) |
Total | | |
Outdoor activity time ≥ 2 h/d | 1 | 1 |
Outdoor activity time < 2 h/d | 1.506 (1.040–2.181) * | 1.734 (1.178–2.552) * |
Table 6.
Comparison of weight between the different screen time groups (n, %).
Table 6.
Comparison of weight between the different screen time groups (n, %).
Group | Normal Weight | Overweight and Obesity | X2 | p |
---|
Boys | | | | |
Screen time < 1 h/d | 278 (73.9) | 98 (26.1) | 7.183 | 0.007 |
Screen time ≥ 1 h/d | 220 (64.7) | 120 (35.3) | | |
Girls | | | | |
Screen time < 1 h/d | 368 (85.6) | 62 (14.4) | 5.184 | 0.023 |
Screen time ≥ 1 h/d | 218 (79.0) | 58 (21.0) | | |
Total | | | | |
Screen time < 1 h/d | 646 (80.1) | 160 (19.1) | 15.765 | 0.000 |
Screen time ≥ 1 h/d | 438 (71.1) | 178 (28.9) | | |
Table 7.
Logistic regression of the relationship between screen time and overweight and obesity.
Table 7.
Logistic regression of the relationship between screen time and overweight and obesity.
Independent Variable | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
---|
Boys | | |
Screen time < 1 h/d | 1 | 1 |
Screen time ≥ 1 h/d | 1.547 (1.123–2.131) * | 1.474 (1.057–2.057) * |
Girls | | |
Screen time < 1 h/d | 1 | 1 |
Screen time ≥ 1 h/d | 1.579 (1.064–2.345) * | 1.676 (1.119–2.511) * |
Total | | |
Screen time < 1 h/d | 1 | 1 |
Screen time ≥ 1 h/d | 1.641 (1.284–2.098) * | 1.639 (1.272–2.113) * |
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).