Next Article in Journal
Using Fish Assemblages to Assess the Ecological Effects of Marine Protection on Rocky Habitats in a Portuguese Natural Park
Previous Article in Journal
Classification and Secondary Metabolite-Biosynthetic Gene Clusters of Marine Streptomyces Strains Including a Lobophorin- and Divergolide-Producer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Hydrobiology
Volume 2
Issue 1
10.3390/hydrobiology2010011
hydrobiology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Hydrobiology of Saline Agriculture Ecosystem: A Review of Scenario Change in South-West Region of Bangladesh

by
Rayhana Akter
1,
Nazmul Hasan
2,3,
Farhadur Reza
4,
Md. Asaduzzaman
5,6,
Kohinoor Begum
7,8,* and
Mashura Shammi
1,*
1
Hydrobiogeochemistry and Pollution Control Laboratory, Department of Environmental Sciences, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh
2
The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima 890-0065, Japan
3
Fruit Science Laboratory, Saga University, Saga 840-8502, Japan
4
Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh
5
Department of Food Processing and Preservation, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh
6
Department of Food Engineering and Technology, State University of Bangladesh, Dhanmondi, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh
7
Tropical Crop Improvement Laboratory, Saga University, Saga 840-8503, Japan
8
United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tokyo University of Agricultural and Technology, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Hydrobiology 2023, 2(1), 162-180; https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010011
Submission received: 20 November 2022 / Revised: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 30 January 2023 / Published: 2 February 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this review paper is to identify the production trends of shrimp and rice farming systems and associated hydrobiological parameters such as salinity in the coastal districts of Bangladesh. An intensive literature review has been conducted to explore salt stress-driven land use change, crop production, and changing ecosystem hydrobiology to adapt climate change impact from 2012–2022. The results indicate that a gradual extension of salt-driven land use and land cover (LULC) change has stressed agricultural production to a greater extent from 1973 to 2022 due to the high level of salinity. The unplanned expansion of shrimp culture is creating adverse consequences for the coastal ecosystem. Some suggestions have been proposed by analysing the mechanisms of crops’ response to salt stress, including several physiological, biochemical, and molecular bases to mitigate the adverse effects of salinity on agricultural production. Alternatively, prawn, shrimp, and crab have similar or slightly higher economic outputs, except for the crop-based agricultural system, which is highly affected by salinity rise. However, due to low input costs, low maintenance, and less environmental impact, farmers are shifting towards crab fattening and thus changing the hydrobiology of coastal land use and land cover.

1. Introduction

Salinity rise is a complex process involving the coastal environment’s meteorological, social, biological, and economic processes. Climate change concerning salinity has had varying implications in Bangladesh, including rising sea levels and an increase in unpredictable disaster events, all of which have substantial financial, ecological, and societal costs [1,2]. The people of Bangladesh are particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change due to their geographical position and socioeconomic characteristics. Effective adaptation strategies will mitigate the negative consequences on livelihood, health, agriculture, and the environment, especially in coastal areas [3]. The Coastal Embankment Project of the early 1960s converted more than 1.2 million hectares of coastal land into farming systems in Bangladesh. A complex system of dams and drainage sluices was applied for this land conversion [4]. Approximately 32% of the country belongs to the coastal area, and more than 29% of the total population resides here [5]. The coastal south-west region is particularly vulnerable to growing salinity threats, due to natural and anthropogenic factors and climate-induced saline waterlogging [6,7]. Life and livelihoods based on the agriculture system suffer significantly, together with soil and groundwater deterioration, health issues, and long-standing effects on the ecosystem [6]. Soil data used in much research from the Soil Resource Development Institute (SRDI) has confirmed that due to insufficient flow from upstream rivers, seawater intrusion has increased soil salinity in coastal districts up to 15 km north of the coast. In the dry season, the salinity level has increased up to 160 km inland [6,8,9]. Hydrochemical analysis of monsoon season surface water indicated Ca-Mg-HCO3 type (66%) and Na-Cl type (17.70%), while during the dry season, Na-Cl type water (52.27%) dominated, followed by Ca-Mg-HCO3 (31.81%) in the south-west coastal districts of Bangladesh [9].
The upward stream-released alluvium deposited in the coastal areas becomes saline as seawater interacts with it, is inundated during high tide in the wet season (June–October), and enters seawater through the creeks. Tropical cyclones, tidal waves, and storm surges keep the coastal land inundated, and increased temperature accelerates evaporation and thus augments salinity. Moreover, the post-monsoon period (November to March) reduces the freshwater flow in the rivers and inland water bodies. Dam construction in the upstream rivers by neighbouring countries e.g., the Farakka barrage, has lessened the flow of freshwater, and consequently, seawater has intruded northwards. Saline water has been trapped through unplanned polder and embankment construction and management in the coastal areas. Furthermore, the unplanned and rapid shrimp cultivation expansion has further accelerated the salinity intrusion and changed the hydrobiological regime [10]. Salinity intrusion in the coastal districts of Bangladesh is primarily associated with geographical location, climate change-induced events such as temperature increase, evaporation, sea level rises, and decreased rainfall, and natural disasters such as storm surges and cyclones. Human interventions such as dam construction in upstream areas, unplanned or planned polder and embankment development, freshwater reduction, and shrimp cultivation as an adaptation measure to climate change have had significant negative impacts on the ecosystem(Figure 1).
Moreover, as salinity rises, shrimp monoculture has become a common global farming strategy. This practice attracts economically desirable foreign shrimp species, which endanger local shrimp populations and change ecosystem function. Anthropocene features of the global shoreline include shrimp species’ planned introduction and redistribution [11]. Consequently, agricultural farming operations shifted while increasing natural enemies, worsening the shortage of irrigation water supply, and increasing harvest losses [12]. Furthermore, conventional wild fish collection in rivers and aquaculture systems, as well as ghers, ponds, and so on, is changing in terms of use and management complexity due to climate change and salinity. From 1989 to 2000, 62.9% of water bodies were intensified, which increased to 77% from 2000 to 2011. Between 2011 and 2015, satellite image analysis revealed that about 89% of the waterlogged areas contained tidal saline water for shrimp production [7]. Land usage and land cover (LULC) analysis is a tool for studying environmental deterioration and controlling unplanned growth. Analyzing the changing trend of LULC in the past and projecting future LULC gives a unique chance to explore and influence current and future land use policies in the coastal areas [13].
Bangladesh is predicted to become a developed and higher income country by 2041, according to the Second Perspective Plan (2021–2041), with a per capita income of almost USD 12,500 [14]. As a result, it is susceptible not just because of its biophysical qualities but also because of its social characteristics. Climate change sensitivity is vital in the central and western coasts, the north-western uplands, and along the main rivers, where significant biophysical and socioeconomic vulnerabilities are predicted [15].
It is also predicted that the coastal hydrobiological regime will change significantly as a result of the changing salinity dynamics. Hydrobiology is concerned with the biology of organisms as well as of limnology, or the science of inland waters [16]. The measurement and integration of hydrological and biological processes at the basin scale in inland coasts is predicated on the premise that abiotic forces such as salinity in the coastal zones are fundamental, and become stable and predictable when biotic interactions such as crop production and aquaculture materialize [17]. The quantification includes measuring the impacts of practices such as shrimp aquaculture in a water body and monitoring of point and non-point source pollution to manage processes toward sustainable ecosystem conservation and ecosystem service management often known as ecohydrology [17]. Nevertheless, the interaction between biota and physicochemical parameters of the water of the coastal ecosystem is the core concern. In this review article, we have covered articles regarding land use change from salt stress on lands that were depicted by the land usage and land cover (LULC) method, biological stress on crops at the molecular level, and changing ecosystem hydrobiology to adapt climate change impact [16]. This study further reviews the production trends of shrimp, crab, and rice farming systems, associated hydrobiological parameters such as soil and water salinity, and the saline ecosystem in the south-west coastal districts in Bangladesh. Finally, this investigation leads to an evidence-based assessment of a climate-resilient, locally led sustainable transition from shrimp farming to a safer method to continue food security in the south of Bangladesh.

2. Review Methodology

Bangladesh has a 710-km-long coastal area with three distinct regions: the south-western, central, and south-eastern coastal zones. An intensive and systematic review of the literature has been carried out to analyse the agricultural production and associated hydrobiological parameters in the coastal districts of Bangladesh (Figure 2). Our initial search keywords, “Coastal areas of Bangladesh”, considered peer-reviewed journal articles in English from databases like Springer (n = 806), Elsevier (n = 1034), and Taylor and Francis (150) from 2012–2023. The articles were further screened using keywords such as agricultural production, shrimp culture, crop production, ecosystem, climate change, salinity intrusion, hydrobiology, biological stress on crops at the molecular level, climate change adaptation and mitigation, resilience, food security, and fisheries in the coastal region of Bangladesh. In addition, we searched Google Scholar and other grey materials. A total of 101 articles were finally considered for review, focusing on land use change from salt stress, biological stress on crops at the molecular level, and changing ecosystem hydrobiology to adapt climate change impact. All the articles were indexed in Endnote, and duplication was checked before review. Four authors worked simultaneously on the literature review, analysis, and extraction of the contents. Two authors worked independently on the content checking. The overall framework of the screening articles and review procedure is shown in Figure 3.

3. Increased Climate Change Effect and Anthropogenic Stress on the South-West Region of Bangladesh

Rising salinity is a significant concern in the coastal districts of Bangladesh. Climate change is predicted to exacerbate saltwater intrusion in coastal regions and coastal islands by increasing storm frequency and severity. Simultaneously, drainage blocks are expected to create havoc in coastal cities [18]. Figure 4 illustrates the degree of soil salinity in 1973, 2000, 2009, and 2022. More than 26.7% (0.223 million ha) of new land has been affected by salinity on different scales between 1973 and 2022. Around 96,566 ha of land have been affected by the severe level of salinity (16< ds/m). Moreover, 35,510 hectares of new land (3.5%) have been affected by varying salinity from 2000 to 2009 [19]. In 2022, more than 200 hectares of land were affected by a salinity level of 16 ds/m, while land with salinity levels 8.1–16 ds/m also rose up to 400 hectares in the coastal zones of Bangladesh [20].
Because of increasing salinity in soil and water, coastal agriculture is one of the most vulnerable sectors to climate variabilities such as temperature variations, rainfall patterns, floods, and droughts. Climate signals and dangers have put a large portion of the food production system at risk. Temperature variations appear to be causing phenological shifts (including higher night-time temperatures). Temperatures that surpass crucial limits for as little as one hour during blooming can have a significant impact on rice yields [21].
Higher temperatures may increase evaporation rates, which may increase by 10–20% by 2030, increasing crop diseases, pest attacks, and other problems in livestock, such as infections, pests, and vector-borne diseases. To deal with salinisation, additional groundwater is pumped into coastal aquifers, causing more saltwater to enter the groundwater system, causing a negative feedback loop [18]. According to recent research, rising salinity in rivers is projected to significantly impact the districts of Satkira, Jhalokati, Barisal, Pirojpur, Khulna, Barguna, Bhola, and Bagerhat. By 2050, the increase in soil salinity is anticipated to range from 26–55% in the most susceptible locations [22].
Rain-fed Aman rice (monsoon-winter), flooded Boro rice (winter), and Aus rice (summer) are the three major rice crops of Bangladesh [18]. Rice production employs 66% of the country’s workforce and supplies 95% of the country’s food grains. It also provides 63% of the country’s calories for urban people and 71% of the country’s calories for rural people. Climate change is expected to impede Aman rice production by increasing the frequency and severity of floods, while Boro rice cultivation is predicted to be hampered by limited surface water availability and groundwater depletion. It is forecast that by 2030 about 60% of rice-growing land will be affected by different seasonal droughts, alternating with increased rainfall and flooding in other areas. According to some sources, Bangladesh’s total rice production will decline by about 8% by 2050 (compared with 1990). A cumulative loss of 80 million tons of rice between 2005 and 2050 is forecast, equivalent to two years’ worth of rice lost over 45 years. The south is the most vulnerable: in the Khulna region, for instance, damage of 10% for Aus and Aman rice and 18% for Boro rice are expected in the 2050s, owing to rising sea levels. On average, saline flood-prone areas are more vulnerable to climate change [23].
The coastal region of Bangladesh is ecologically rich and composed of mangrove forests, tidal estuaries, and prolific agricultural land. However, salinity intrusion severely stresses agricultural production by creating special hydrological and environmental conditions throughout the year [24]. Salinisation in Bangladesh’s coastal regions is the major hydrobiological characteristic that threatens the long-term growth of several sectors, such as agriculture, forestry, fisheries, livestock, and health. In response to salinisation, the hydrobiology of the aquatic agricultural systems and their surrounding livelihoods in the south-west region of Bangladesh has progressed in response to various biophysical stimuli, thresholds, and responses, including improved market availability and technical progress [25,26]. The farming systems on the coasts are very dynamic, with agriculture practice with a freshwater prawn-dominated system with low salinity, an intermediate-salinity mixed prawn and shrimp system, and a high-salinity shrimp-dominated system. Crop productivity, cropping intensity, and cost-effectiveness are best in the diverse low- to intermediate-salinity soil class, and lowest in the high-salinity soil class [26]. In the high-salinity soil class, agricultural crops cannot be produced. In addition, cropping intensity in the south-west region also increased from 135% in 1992 to 175% in 2018, identified by the LULC analysis [12]. Table 1 indicates the articles covering LULC and other methods of land conversion for shrimp cultivation. From the previous data on LULC change, it is evident that shrimp farming in coastal Bangladesh was trending and shrimp farming is Bangladesh’s second-largest source of foreign income [27]. It is also the backbone of coastal aquaculture. However, coastal aquaculture is not without environmental impacts, which are reviewed in the following Section 3.1 and Section 3.2.

3.1. Environmental Impacts of Shrimp Aquaculture

With 0.276 million hectares already under brackish water shrimp production, Bangladesh has a considerable coastline tidal zone suited for shrimp farming [31]. Moreover, the development of Bangladesh’s blue economy is deep-rooted in the advancement of shrimp aquaculture such as black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon), brown shrimp (Metapenaeus monoceros), Indian white shrimp (Penaeus indicus), mud crab (Scylla serata), white pomfret (Pampus argenteus), white mullet (Mugil curema), barramundi (Lates calcarifer), and so on [32,33,34]. Due to geographically low-lying tidal floodplains and the availability of natural postlarvae, coastal areas of Bangladesh initially prioritised brackish-water shrimp farming. The conventional cultivation method was used for the commercialised shrimp aquaculture systems in this region by trapping saltwater in more than 50 hectares without using much nutrient input [35]. Although Bangladesh’s coastal agro-climate is favourable for shrimp and prawn cultivation, the accessibility of resources, as well as the ease and low cost of operations, drove the swift spread of shrimp aquaculture rather than prawn farming [29].
Moreover, because of the salinity and unfavourable habitat conditions, potential negative repercussions on fisheries have increased in the south-west coastal districts of Bangladesh. Between 1984 and 2014, typical salinisation rose more than six times, and in specific locations, 10 to 15 times [29]. From the shrimp ponds, saline water can enter the subsurface aquifers, causing groundwater salinisation and raising submarine groundwater outflow to coastal seas [36]. In south-west coastal Bangladesh, the swift transformation of croplands to shrimp farms triggered significant negative socio-ecological consequences on the coastal ecosystems, including changed land-use patterns [28,34,35]. Salinity intrusion caused by shrimp farming dramatically lowered agricultural and livestock productivity and eliminated several livelihood possibilities in the shrimp farming area [29].
The disease burden has also increased subsequently across all shrimp farms and has become increasingly polarised with fewer particular infections. White spot disease, produced by the white spot syndrome virus, causes widespread mortality and commercial losses in the shrimp industries across South and Southeast Asia [37,38]. Growers also described physical anomalies, nutritive deficiencies, and unidentified illnesses, indicating poor-quality stock. Despite a slight decrease in antimicrobials, shrimps were subjected to a broader spectrum of pollutants throughout cultivating period. In response, growers used more chemical treatments (5.2 remedial action/farm in 2008 versus 28.8 remedial action/farm in 2016), which resulted in a 424% increase in different active chemical compounds including antibiotics entering the shrimp ghers/ponds.
Consequently, a concern for human health and ecological well-being necessitates more investigation to discover possible dangers from the breakdown of chemical products [38]. The primary drivers of shrimp farming’s negative consequences on the ecosystem are related to conventional farming practices, unsatisfactory planning for water management in the ghers, unsustainable seed supplies, irrigation infrastructures and so on [39]. Effective methods for preventing adverse environmental effects from shrimp aquaculture development are now required. Diverse scientific and indigenous knowledge is being used to deal with the changing hydrobiological regime.

3.2. Impact of Salt Stress on Crop Production

Salinity and shrimp farming are responsible for the deficiency of fresh and irrigation water on the coasts [6]. Intensive shrimp aquaculture has resulted in the extinction of fruit species and other indigenous flowering species, fresh and brackish water species, scarcity of safe drinking water, poverty, unemployment, social conflicts, unrest, and forced migration [28,33,39,40]. Furthermore, the threatened states of these systems have further created ecosystem conflicts with human health and socioeconomic factors [2]. Mangrove deterioration, biodiversity loss, sedimentation, saltwater intrusion, pollution, and disease outbreaks have all been cited as significant ecological impairments leading to unsustainable aquaculture practices. The prime crop of south-west coastal Bangladesh is rice, e.g., Aus, Aman, and Boro. However, high salinity discourages farmers from cultivating Aus rice [10]. It is predicted that the loss in Aus and Aman rice production will be 7580 tons and 19,620 tons by 2030 [41]. Around 15354.38 MT and 355.50 MT would reduce Boro rice and wheat production in 2100 against the base year 2010 [6]. Other crops like jute, sesame, groundnut, mustard, and winter vegetables are also being cultivated on a partial scale [10].
The climate change-driven rise in salinity has caused a radical production decline of major crops, e.g., cereals, potatoes, pulses, oilseeds, vegetables, species, and fruits. Various fruit trees, such as mango, betel nut, date palm, giant taro, jackfruit, blackberry, etc., are endangered significantly. A radical drop has been observed in the case of betel nut, papaya and banana. Yield loss in the coastal areas has been estimated to be nearly 1.4 million tons per annum, which is 20–40%. In addition, 24% of the inland native freshwater fishes are threatened, 19% are endangered, and 12% are already extinct in the coastal region [42], while 25% of shrimp and 10% of marine fish have disappeared due to high salinity [43].
Each year, salinity intrusion affects around 200 ha of grazing land or fodder crop areas. Therefore, livestock production in the coastal region suffers from food deficiency [42]. Salinity intrusion erodes the coastal zones’ green belt and catalyses the increase in temperature, heavy showers, drought, etc. [10]. It was estimated that the ecosystem service value (ESV) of coastal agriculture dropped from 2.89 (US$ × 109/year) in 1980 to 1.48 (US$ × 109/year) in 2016 [44]. The significant impacts of rising salinity in the coastal hydrobiology of Bangladesh are summarised below in Figure 5.
In dry seasons, soil salinity is a significant yield-limiting aspect of crop production [45,46]. Salt concentration in the soil increases in the dry season as the water evaporates, leaving a combination of stored salts in clay loam and groundwater capillary movement [47,48]. This recurrent occurrence in coastal zones affects around 63% (1,056,000 hectares) of farmed land [49]. As a result, soil salinity can considerably impede agricultural production, increasing vulnerability to food poverty and potentially affecting the lives of around 38.5 million coastal residents [50,51,52].
Alteration of salinity might decrease the yield and alter crop quality [53] by hampering photosynthesis, causing damage to stomata and chloroplast structure and leading to malfunctioning chlorophylls and enzymes [54]. Abnormal root-shoot formation in seedlings, and delayed flowering and fruiting patterns are observed from salt stress despite the presence of self-defence mechanisms in the plants [55]. Salt stress negatively affects seedlings’ growth and ion contents, except for sodium (Na+) ions. The high Na+ and Cl− ion concentration causes imbalanced cellular homeostasis and nutrient uptake, nutrient shortage, and oxidative stresses, followed by cell death [56,57]. Increased concentrations of Na+ and Cl− ions in the cell reduce water and nutrient uptake by lowering osmotic pressure in the nutrient-containing medium and drastically affect plant morphological traits [58,59].
The mechanisms of how crops react to salt pressure comprise several biological, biochemical, and molecular bases [60]. These responses could be classified into osmotic tolerance, ion exclusion, and tissue tolerance. Long-distance signals inhibit shoot development in osmotic tolerance, positively controlling the synthesis of suitable solutions to sustain leaf expansion and stomatal conductance [61]. The transportation of Na+ can be excluded in the root zone to prevent the accumulation of the ion from reaching toxic levels in plant leaves. Na+ could be trapped in the vacuoles despite having a high salt concentration in the leaves, causing the tissues to tolerate the salt stress. Proline and glycine betaine accumulation was reported in osmoprotectant mechanisms in maize [62,63]. Glycine betaine, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenger, was found to be accumulated in wheat and responsible for hormone modulation [64].
The hereditary base of salt tolerance was also studied. Salt overlay sensitivity (SOS) homologs in rice (Oryza sativa) OsSOS1, CBL-interacting protein kinases OsCIPK24, and calcineurin B-like OsCBL4 were reported to be involved in salt exclusion. In wheat (Triticum aestivum) TaSOS1 and (Triticum durum) TdSOS1, and corn (Zea mays), Na+/H+ exchangers ZmNHX7 were reported as Na+/H+ antiporters in maize [65]. The tonoplast-based NHX group sequestrated Na+ in the vacuole. The overexpression of OsNHX1 and VIVIPAROUS1-like OsVP1 in rice could improve salinity tolerance. Similarly, several Na+ sequestrator NHX genes were characterised in the vacuoles, including five NHX genes in rice (OsNHX1 to OsNHX5), four in wheat (TaNHX1, TaNHX2, TaNHX3, and TaNHX4-B) and six in maize (ZmNHX1 to ZmNHX6)[66]. High-affinity potassium (HAK) transporters also help to induce salt tolerance; 27 HAK genes in rice and maize and 56 in wheat were reported [67,68]. Besides ionic mechanisms, phytohormones such as abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid also mediate salt tolerance in rice, wheat, and maize [63,69,70,71].
Designing salt-tolerant crop cultivars is vital in improving production on salty soils [72,73]. High-throughput phenotypic screening for recognising biotic or abiotic stress responses can capture variances in phenotypes which are not easily noticeable by the human eye, such as plant biomass, leaf area, water use efficiency, growth rate, or transpiration [74,75,76,77]. Salt-tolerant plants must adopt one or more characteristics, such as higher osmotic pressure, enhanced exclusion of ions such as Na+ and Cl− when present in excess, and compartmentalisation of Na+ and Cl− ions into cell organelles [78]. Some differently regulated genes directly protect plants from salt stress, whilst others activate multiple signalling pathways linked to variations in reactive oxygen species, lipid phosphatase, and cyclic nucleotides. Some salt-tolerant plants prohibit Na+ and Cl− from leaves by limiting them during uptake by root or during transportation from root to shoot, or plants accumulate compatible solutes in their cytoplasms, such as proline, glycine betaine, and polyamines, to osmotically balance the toxic ions sequestered in the vacuole [79].
A recent study revealed that soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value, plant height, shoot dry matter, panicle number per plant, filled/empty grain percentage, thousand grains’ weight, grain yield, harvest index, and irrigation-water productivity of rice were significantly affected by water salinity [80]. Another study on the accumulation of primary and secondary nutrients in Indian spinach (Basella alba), papaya (Carica papaya), and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) in the Barguna and Patuakhali districts revealed that the accumulation trend in these vegetables was Ca > Mg > P > K > S in saline areas. The study suggested papaya, Indian spinach, and okra as moderately saline-tolerant vegetable crops [81]. BARI Sarisha-18 (Canola) and BARI Sarisha-16 were found to be suitable for combining coastal cropping patterns in recent research on mustard varieties in Shatkhira, Koyra, and Bagerhat [82]. Several Bari varieties of tomatoes (BARI-T 1, BARI-T 2, BARI-T 3, BARI-T 4, and BARI-T 5) could not tolerate moderate salinity stress (>4 dS/m) and accumulated salt in the soils [83]. Further investigations and saline-tolerant varieties were recommended for improvement.
As a biotechnological approach, inoculating a salt-tolerant plant-growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), namely Brevibacterium sediminis, offered a great advantage to combat salt stress in seedling growth of salt-tolerant BINA dhan-10 and salt-susceptible BRRI dhan-29 rice varieties [84]. The PGPB has remarkable impacts on ensuring normal growth and development of plants under salinity [85]. Many bacterial strains, such as Bacillus spp., Pseudomonas spp., Frankia spp., and Rhizobia spp. have been identified that are capable of aiding plants to tolerate various environmental stresses, including salinity [86]. Six ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenised wheat lines originating from BARI Gom-25, a moderately salt-tolerant variety, were found promising in saline conditions based on K+, Na+, and Cl− accumulation in leaves, water use index, 1000 seed weight, and phenotypic analysis [87]. Constant green manuring with dairy manure, biochar application, and balancing K+ improve soil chemical characteristics on the coasts by lowering salinity, modifying pH, and increasing soil organic carbon, and accessible N and P [88,89,90]. Reducing salt stress on crops, therefore, requires balanced technological approaches blended with socio-environmental situation and political willingness. It also requires a shift in paradigm on economical and ecosystem perspectives for adopting various techniques.

3.3. Paradigm Shifting and Changing Ecosystem Services- Various Adaptation Techniques

Changing ecosystem services is another significant observation reviewed from the south-west region of Bangladesh. Conventional wild fish collection in rivers and aquaculture systems, such as ghers, ponds, and crab collection stations, is being transformed in terms of usage and management intensity, and is being influenced by climate change [91]. Compared with the previous decade (1999–2008), most farmers (95.5%) had to modify at least one of their farming operations from 2009–2018 onwards, triggered by climate change and shrimp aquaculture [92]. The detrimental consequences of shrimp farming as a climate change adaptation method have received little attention, even though the effects of climate change and shrimp farming have been thoroughly investigated. Existing policies are often thought to be more focused on making commercial fishing more resilient without considering that the adverse effects of traditional activities might worsen other social and economic problems. River water discharge (1500 to 2000 m3/S), climate (28 °C), and soil salinity (4 to 10 dS/m) are biophysical limits that influence societal situations. If these thresholds are exceeded, the complex socio-ecological systems may soon lose resilience, increasing the chance of regime transitions [25].
There are primarily 12 crab species in Bangladesh. Giant mud crab (Scylla serrata) fattening was initiated as an adaptation plan in coastal regions [93]. Crab fattening, which had an export value of more than USD 37 million in the 1992–93 financial year, is very popular for various reasons such as low saline water (15 to 30 ppt), low cannibalism rate, accessibility to operations, and high demand in the national and international markets such as Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong, but also faces several problems such as a lack of credit return in time, little knowledge of crab biology, and poor marketing operations [34,94,95]. However, increments in crab fattening and harvesting in low salinity also surprised the shrimp production industry, which also makes valuable export earnings for Bangladesh, because crab fattening needs lower salinity than shrimp production, and has other factors such as a minimum wage, high production rate, etc. [96]. However, Satkhira, Khulna and Bagerhat are the three major districts where crab fattening is more prevalent than in other coastal areas, because the right level of salinity is one of the essential abiotic factors influencing the distribution, abundance, general physiology, survivability, and well-being of crustaceans [97]. The average river water salinity level was 8.21 ppt in the dry season and 0.64 ppt during the wet season in 1998–2000. However, in recent years, this level has increased to 22.6 ppt in the dry season and 12–16.7 ppt during the wet season. Water salinity of 12–16 ppt is ideal for shrimp farming. The orange mud crab (Scylla olivacea) demands salt levels ranging from 10 to 20 ppt, and became an incidental crop during shrimp and mixed salt-tolerant rice–fish farming. As an alternative livelihood, crab fattening has become an adaptive technique for coping with salt intrusion [98,99]. However, despite having a large coastal area, only a few sites such as Chittagong, Barishal, Noakhali, Satkhaina, Potuakhali, Kutubdia, and Sandwip are prevalent in three kinds of aquaculture, namely inland culture (821,923 hectares), inland capture (3,890,828 hectares), and marine water (11,881,300 hectares), and the production of crab, shrimp, prawn, finfish, and rice, due to higher demand in the international market, higher economic returns from small investments, lower operational costs, and favourable government policy [34,35]. The recently exploited integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) models such as shrimp + crab, shrimp + fish, shrimp + sea cucumber, shrimp + jellyfish + clam, shrimp + crab + clam, shrimp + crab + clam + fish, and ridge trail white shrimp polyculture operate in a combination of saline–alkaline water. The model is tailored to fit local conditions and the organisms’ characteristics. The eco-friendly IMTA culture models utilise pond culture resources to maximise output with little extra feed and labour inputs while lowering effluents and treatment costs [100]. Our literature review identifies agroecological systems’ biophysical parameters (Table 2) suitable for shifting towards crab fattening and others that can be blended with the saline agriculture ecosystem.

3.4. Challenges and Opportunities of Saline Ecosystem

Due to sea level rise, salinity stress, incorporated with drought, heat, and waterlogging, is expected to rise during this century [104]. As a result, climate change is predicted to alter the viability and profitability of agricultural options and cropping patterns throughout the region, posing problems for farmers and their communities. Climate change forecasts imply that less diverse agricultural systems may face future problems [105]. Fish polyculture and agriculture, such as mixed rice–shrimp culture, mixed salt-based rice–crab blending, and salt-tolerant rice production can be adopted as an alternative to adapt to the economic uncertainty of climate change, and changing hydrobiology and ecosystem services [11,33,43,102]. Due to climate change, farmers are adopting various strategies such as mixed rice–shrimp production, mulching for vegetables, salt-tolerant rice verities, crab fattening, soil flushing, fishing from open marine water, changing crop patterns, harvesting rainwater, and using sand-pond filter systems for drinking water. Fish polyculture is a widespread practice in pond aquaculture, where different fish species are grown together to provide a multi-output production system. Fish polyculture may be an adaptation method to respond to environmental change in Bangladesh’s south-west coastal area. Farmers in the coastal region increasingly employ fish polyculture practices to deal with the shifting scenario. The return from incorporating more than one species in shrimp ponds is reasonable and economically helpful for producers [33]. Table 3 indicates some techniques for adaptation in the rising saline ecosystem that were found economically viable.
Subsistence-orientated smallholder farmers in south-west Bangladesh’s shrimp-producing districts widely use crop diversification strategies in response to adverse environmental changes and crop failure concerns. Farmers have planted less rice in the dry season, with salinity-related yield loss being the primary cause. Due to yield losses, most rice farmers anticipate they will cease planting rice this season. On the other hand, shrimp and salt farmers have already curtailed rice production for the same reason and turned to shrimp and salt farming because they believe these businesses are more profitable and need less labour than rice growing [106]. Cultivating several crops (including rice, non-rice crops, shrimp/fish, vegetables, and animals) in different combinations throughout the year may be a sustainable agricultural adaptation since it reduces economic and environmental risks. It may also encourage women’s engagement in subsistence agricultural activities such as household gardening and cattle keeping [35]. The economic advantages of adopting rice–prawn aquaculture, replanting rice, and salt tolerant and short-duration rice types have been discovered to outweigh the other adaptation alternatives. Investing USD 10 in such adaption options yields a net return of USD 22, USD 4, USD 2, and USD 2, respectively [1]. Despite higher production costs, prawn-based systems generated net income nearly three times higher (USD 3410 to 4470) than shrimp-based systems (USD 1570 to 1790) because dyke crops added about 25% extra income [29,107]. The prawn–rice farming system generates diverse job possibilities and a substantial increase in agricultural crop yield. On the other hand, mud crab production had variable and total expenses of USD 4293 and USD 6104, respectively. The net return was USD 4418/hectare, and the benefit–cost ratio (BCR) was 1.72, which is similar to the shrimp-based system [94,98].
The coastal bio-physical and socio-economic factors change the LULC and modify the socio-ecological system significantly in Bangladesh, which has been reviewed in this article [4]. It is therefore evident that the strategic integration of policies, plans, and programmes should be developed for the protection of hydrobiological regimes in the coastal zones of Bangladesh. Although prawn, shrimp, and crab have similar or slightly higher economic output, due to low input costs, low maintenance and less environmental impacts, farmers are shifting towards crab fattening. Crablets, feed, and bamboo fences (known locally as bana) all increased output in crab fattening. Based on the review, we have drawn up a conceptual model suitable for the hydrobiological regime of coastal Bangladesh. The farming system changes and changing aquaculture systems can be modified to suit the environment and climate change adaptation based on the solution of nature-based local resources (Figure 6). Salt-tolerant gene modification for diversified crop species can be adopted, developed, and trialled by the local institutes. In addition, research and development should be focused on multi-trophic aquaculture and fish polyculture ponds. The government should provide critical guidelines integrating aquaculture, agriculture, and farming management to improve the hydrobiological regime of the coastal zones of Bangladesh.

4. Concluding Remarks

To explore salt stress-driven land use change, biological stress on crop production, and changing ecosystem hydrobiology to adapt climate change impacts, an intensive literature review has been conducted. In 2022, soil salinity assessment shows that more than 200 hectares of coastal land were affected by a salinity level of 16 ds/m, while land with salinity levels 8.1–16 ds/m also rose to 400 hectares in Bangladesh. The steady expansion of salt-driven land use change puts a higher strain on agricultural productivity. The uncontrolled expansion of shrimp cultivation is harming the coastal ecology. Some proposals for mitigating the negative impacts of salinity on agricultural productivity have been given by analysing the processes of crops’ reaction to salt stress, which include numerous physiological, biochemical, and molecular bases. To combat the current climate change-induced salinity intrusion, several adaptation measures are recommended, including changing agricultural practices, integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, crop diversification, and ridge trail white shrimp polyculture in a combination of saline–alkaline water, and further investigation and promotion of ecosystem services. Although prawn, shrimp, and crab have similar or slightly higher economic outputs, due to low input costs, low maintenance, and fewer environmental impacts, farmers are shifting towards crab fattening. The farming system changes and changing aquaculture systems can be modified to suit the environment and climate change adaptation based on a solution of nature-based local resources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation and methodology M.S., K.B., N.H. and F.R.; initial draft R.A. and M.A.; preparation of all maps, figures and tables F.R. and M.S. review and editing M.S., K.B., N.H., F.R. and M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are shown within the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Arfanuzzaman, M.; Mamnun, N.; Islam, M.; Dilshad, T.; Syed, M. Evaluation of Adaptation Practices in the Agriculture Sector of Bangladesh: An Ecosystem Based Assessment. Climate 2016, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hossain, P.R.; Ludwig, F.; Leemans, R. Adaptation pathways to cope with salinization in south-west coastal region of Bangladesh. Ecol. Soc. 2018, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chowdhury, M.A.; Hasan, M.K.; Islam, S.L.U. Climate change adaptation in Bangladesh: Current practices, challenges and the way forward. J. Clim. Chang. Health 2022, 6, 100108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rahman, M.A.; Dawes, L.; Donehue, P.; Rahman, M.R. Transformation of the coastal social-ecological system in southwest Bangladesh due to empolderment. Water Hist. 2022, 14, 147–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, H. Coastal Zone Management Bangladesh Coastal Zone Management Status and Future Trends. J. Coast. Zone Manag. 2019, 22, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khanom, T. Effect of salinity on food security in the context of interior coast of Bangladesh. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2016, 130, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tareq, S.M.; Tauhid Ur Rahman, M.; Zahedul Islam, A.Z.M.; Baddruzzaman, A.B.M.; Ashraf Ali, M. Evaluation of climate-induced waterlogging hazards in the south-west coast of Bangladesh using Geoinformatics. Env. Monit Assess 2018, 190, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Morshed, M.M.; Islam, M.S.; Lohano, H.D.; Shyamsundar, P. Production externalities of shrimp aquaculture on paddy farming in coastal Bangladesh. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 238, 106213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shammi, M.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.A.; Bodrud-Doza, M.; Zahid, A.; Akter, Y.; Quaiyum, S.; Kurasaki, M. Spatio-temporal assessment and trend analysis of surface water salinity in the coastal region of Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 14273–14290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Unnayan Onnesha. Salinity Intrusion in Interior Coast: A New Challenge to Agriculture in South Central Part of Bangladesh; Unnayan Onnesha: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Muhammad Abdullah, H.; Ahmed, S.M.; Khan, B.M.; Mohana, N.T.; Ahamed, T.; Islam, I. Agriculture and fisheries production in a regional blending and dynamic fresh and saline water systems in the coastal area of Bangladesh. Environ. Chall. 2021, 4, 100089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jamal, M.R.; Kristiansen, P.; Kabir, M.J.; Kumar, L.; Lobry de Bruyn, L. Trajectories of cropping system intensification under changing environment in south-west coastal Bangladesh. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2021, 20, 722–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rahman, M.T.U.; Tabassum, F.; Rasheduzzaman, M.; Saba, H.; Sarkar, L.; Ferdous, J.; Uddin, S.Z.; Zahedul Islam, A.Z.M. Temporal dynamics of land use/land cover change and its prediction using CA-ANN model for southwestern coastal Bangladesh. Environ. Monit Assess 2017, 189, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. GED/Plancom/MP/GoB. Making Vision 2041 a Reality: Perspective Plan of Bangladesh 2021–2024. 2020. Available online: http://oldweb.lged.gov.bd/uploadeddocument/unitpublication/1/1049/vision%202021-2041.pdf (accessed on 5 November 2022).
  15. Affairs, N.s.M.o.F. Climate Change Profile Bangladesh. Available online: https://www.government.nl/binaries/government/documenten/publications/2019/02/05/climate-change-profiles/Bangladesh.pdf (accessed on 15 November 2018).
  16. Schwoerbel, J. Methods of Hydrobiology: (Freshwater Biology); Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sohel, M.S.I.; Ullah, M.H. Ecohydrology: A framework for overcoming the environmental impacts of shrimp aquaculture on the coastal zone of Bangladesh. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2012, 63, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Thomas, T.; Mainuddin, K.; Chiang, C.; Rahman, A.; Haque, A.; Islam, N.; Quasem, S.; Sun, Y. Agriculture and Adaptation in Bangladesh: Current and Projected Impacts of Climate Change; IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 01281; International Food Policy Research Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hossen, B.; Yabar, H.; Faruque, M.J. Exploring the Potential of Soil Salinity Assessment through Remote Sensing and GIS: Case Study in the Coastal Rural Areas of Bangladesh. Land 2022, 11, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shoaib, M.U.J. Adoption of Sustainable Land Management (SLM) to Halt Salinization Bangladesh Coastal Region, Agricultural Extension in South Asia, Blog-166. 2022. [Google Scholar]
  21. Raoufi, R.S.; Soufizadeh, S. Simulation of the impacts of climate change on phenology, growth, and yield of various rice genotypes in humid sub-tropical environments using AquaCrop-Rice. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2020, 64, 1657–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. WB. Salinity Intrusion in a Changing Climate Scenario Will Hit Coastal Bangladesh Hard. 2015. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2015/02/17/salinity-intrusion-in-changing-climate-scenario-will-hit-coastal-bangladesh-hard (accessed on 16 November 2022).
  23. Xenarios, S.; Nemes, A.; Sarker, G.W.; Sekhar, N.U. Assessing vulnerability to climate change: Are communities in flood-prone areas in Bangladesh more vulnerable than those in drought-prone areas? Water Resour. Rural Dev. 2016, 7, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huq, N.; Hugé, J.; Boon, E.; Gain, A. Climate Change Impacts in Agricultural Communities in Rural Areas of Coastal Bangladesh: A Tale of Many Stories. Sustainability 2015, 7, 8437–8460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hossain, M.S.; Ramirez, J.; Szabo, S.; Eigenbrod, F.; Johnson, F.A.; Speranza, C.I.; Dearing, J.A. Participatory modelling for conceptualizing social-ecological system dynamics in the Bangladesh delta. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2020, 20, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Faruque, G.; Sarwer, R.H.; Karim, M.; Phillips, M.; Collis, W.J.; Belton, B.; Kassam, L. The evolution of aquatic agricultural systems in Southwest Bangladesh in response to salinity and other drivers of change. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2016, 15, 185–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Haque, M.M.; Islam, M.S.; Hossain, M.I.; Jahan, H. Conditions for participation of marginalized households in shrimp value chains of the coastal region of Bangladesh. Aquaculture 2022, 555, 738258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barai, K.R.; Harashina, K.; Satta, N.; Annaka, T. Comparative analysis of land-use pattern and socioeconomic status between shrimp- and rice- production areas in southwestern coastal Bangladesh: A land-use/cover change analysis over 30 years. J. Coast. Conserv. 2019, 23, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Islam, M.R.; Tabeta, S. Shrimp vs prawn-rice farming in Bangladesh: A comparative impacts study on local environments and livelihoods. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2019, 168, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Parven, A.; Pal, I.; Witayangkurn, A.; Pramanik, M.; Nagai, M.; Miyazaki, H.; Wuthisakkaroon, C. Impacts of disaster and land-use change on food security and adaptation: Evidence from the delta community in Bangladesh. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022, 78, 103119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kabir, M.H.; Iva, I.J. Ecological consequences of shrimp farming in Southwestern Satkhira District of Bangladesh. Austin. J. Earth Sci. 2014, 1, 7. [Google Scholar]
  32. AftabUddin, S.; Hussain, M.G.; Abdullah Al, M.; Failler, P.; Drakeford, B.M. On the potential and constraints of mariculture development in Bangladesh. Aquac. Int. 2021, 29, 575–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Basu, S.; Roy, A. An economic assessment of fish polyculture as an adaptation strategy against environmental change in the southwest coastal region of Bangladesh. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 78, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hasan, J.; Lima, R.A.; Shaha, D.C. Fisheries resources of Bangladesh: A review. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 2021, 9, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Akber, M.A.; Islam, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Rahman, M.R. Crop diversification in southwest coastal Bangladesh: Insights into farming adaptation. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 46, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hou, Y.; Yang, J.; Russoniello, C.J.; Zheng, T.; Wu, M.L.; Yu, X. Impacts of Coastal Shrimp Ponds on Saltwater Intrusion and Submarine Groundwater Discharge. Water Resour. Res. 2022, 58, e2021WR031866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hasan, N.A.; Haque, M.M.; Hinchliffe, S.J.; Guilder, J. A sequential assessment of WSD risk factors of shrimp farming in Bangladesh: Looking for a sustainable farming system. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Heal, R.D.; Hasan, N.A.; Haque, M.M. Increasing disease burden and use of drugs and chemicals in Bangladesh shrimp aquaculture: A potential menace to human health. Mar Pollut. Bull. 2021, 172, 112796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hossain, M.S.; Uddin, M.J.; Fakhruddin, A.N.M. Impacts of shrimp farming on the coastal environment of Bangladesh and approach for management. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2013, 12, 313–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adnan, M.S.G.; Abdullah, A.Y.M.; Dewan, A.; Hall, J.W. The effects of changing land use and flood hazard on poverty in coastal Bangladesh. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rahman, M.S.; Rahman, M.A. Impacts of Climate Change on Crop Production in Bangladesh: A Review. J. Agric. Crops 2019, 5, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alam, M.Z.; Carpenter-Boggs, L.; Mitra, S.; Haque, M.M.; Halsey, J.; Rokonuzzaman, M.; Saha, B.; Moniruzzaman, M. Effect of Salinity Intrusion on Food Crops, Livestock, and Fish Species at Kalapara Coastal Belt in Bangladesh. J. Food Qual. 2017, 2017, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rakib, M.A.; Sasaki, J.; Pal, S.; Newaz, M.A.; Bodrud-Doza, M.; Bhuiyan, M.A.H. An investigation of coastal vulnerability and internal consistency of local perceptions under climate change risk in the southwest part of Bangladesh. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 231, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Akber, M.A.; Khan, M.W.R.; Islam, M.A.; Rahman, M.M.; Rahman, M.R. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services of southwest coastal Bangladesh. J. Land Use Sci. 2018, 13, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Paul, P.L.C.; Bell, R.W.; Barrett-Lennard, E.G.; Kabir, E. Variation in the yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) due to differing tillage systems is associated with variation in solute potential of the soil solution in a salt-affected coastal region of the Ganges Delta. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 197, 104489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Salehin, M.; Chowdhury, M.; Arefin, M.; Clarke, D.; Mondal, S.; Nowreen, S.; Jahiruddin, M.; Haque, A. Mechanisms and Drivers of Soil Salinity in Coastal Bangladesh. In Ecosystem Services for Well-Being in Deltas; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, switzerland, 2018; pp. 333–347. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mainuddin, M.; Maniruzzaman, M.; Alam, M.M.; Mojid, M.A.; Schmidt, E.J.; Islam, M.T.; Scobie, M. Water usage and productivity of Boro rice at the field level and their impacts on the sustainable groundwater irrigation in the North-West Bangladesh. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 240, 106294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mainuddin, M.; Bell, R.W.; Gaydon, D.S.; Kirby, J.M.; Barrett-Lennard, E.G.; Glover, M.; Akanda, M.R.; Maji, B.; Ali, M.A.; Brahmachari, K. An Overview of the Ganges Coastal Zone: Climate, Hydrology, Land Use, and Vulnerability. J. Indian Soc. Coast. Agric. Res. 2019, 37, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  49. Carcedo, A.J.P.; Bastos, L.M.; Yadav, S.; Mondal, M.K.; Jagadish, S.V.K.; Kamal, F.A.; Sutradhar, A.; Prasad, P.V.V.; Ciampitti, I. Assessing impact of salinity and climate scenarios on dry season field crops in the coastal region of Bangladesh. Agric. Syst. 2022, 200, 103428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Samson, B.K.; Sengxua, P.; Vorlason, S.; Douangboupha, K.; Eberbach, P.; Vote, C.; Jackson, T.; Harnpichitvitaya, D.; Wade, L.J. Short-duration mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek) genotypes differ in performance, water use and apparent water-use efficiency in southern Lao PDR. Field Crops Res. 2020, 245, 107662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Nisbett, N.; Davis, P.; Yosef, S.; Akhtar, N. Bangladesh’s story of change in nutrition: Strong improvements in basic and underlying determinants with an unfinished agenda for direct community level support. Glob. Food Secur. 2017, 13, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Uitto, J.I.; Shaw, R. (Eds.) Sustainable Development and Disaster Risk Reduction: Introduction; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. dos Santos, T.B.; Ribas, A.F.; de Souza, S.G.H.; Budzinski, I.G.F.; Domingues, D.S. Physiological Responses to Drought, Salinity, and Heat Stress in Plants: A Review. Stresses 2022, 2, 113–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gengmao, Z.; Shihui, L.; Xing, S.; Yizhou, W.; Zipan, C. The role of silicon in physiology of the medicinal plant (Lonicera japonica L.) under salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Safdar, H.; Amin, A.; Shafiq, Y.; Ali, A.; Yasin, R.; Sarwar, M.I. A Review: Impact of Salinity on Plant Growth. Nat. Sci. 2019, 1, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ahanger, M.A.; Agarwal, R.M. Salinity stress induced alterations in antioxidant metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as influenced by potassium supplementation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sarwar, A.G.; Tinne, F.J.; Islam, N.; Islam, M.M.; Haque, M.S. Effects of Salt Stress on Growth and Accumulation of NA+, K+ And ca2+ Ions in Different Accessions of Sesbania. Bangladesh J. Bot. 2022, 51, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cantabella, D.; Piqueras, A.; Acosta-Motos, J.R.; Bernal-Vicente, A.; Hernandez, J.A.; Diaz-Vivancos, P. Salt-tolerance mechanisms induced in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni: Effects on mineral nutrition, antioxidative metabolism and steviol glycoside content. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 484–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sapre, S.; Gontia-Mishra, I.; Tiwari, S. Klebsiella sp. confers enhanced tolerance to salinity and plant growth promotion in oat seedlings (Avena sativa). Microbiol. Res. 2018, 206, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jha, U.C.; Bohra, A.; Jha, R.; Parida, S.K. Salinity stress response and ‘omics’ approaches for improving salinity stress tolerance in major grain legumes. Plant Cell Rep. 2019, 38, 255–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Blum, A. Osmotic adjustment is a prime drought stress adaptive engine in support of plant production. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Farooq, M.; Hussain, M.; Wakeel, A.; Siddique, K.H.M. Salt stress in maize: Effects, resistance mechanisms, and management. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 461–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Iqbal, S.; Hussain, S.; Abdul Qayyaum, M.; Ashraf, M.; Saifullah. The Response of Maize Physiology under Salinity Stress and Its Coping Strategies. In Plant Stress Physiology; Hossain, A., Ed.; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shahid, M.A.; Sarkhosh, A.; Khan, N.; Balal, R.M.; Ali, S.; Rossi, L.; Gómez, C.; Mattson, N.; Nasim, W.; Garcia-Sanchez, F. Insights into the Physiological and Biochemical Impacts of Salt Stress on Plant Growth and Development. Agronomy 2020, 10, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bosnic, P.; Bosnic, D.; Jasnic, J.; Nikolic, M. Silicon mediates sodium transport and partitioning in maize under moderate salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hussain, A.; Tanveer, R.; Mustafa, G.; Farooq, M.; Amin, I.; Mansoor, S. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of aquaporins provides insight into the gene family expansion and evolution in plants and their role in drought tolerant and susceptible chickpea cultivars. Genomics 2020, 112, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cheng, X.; Liu, X.; Mao, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; Zhan, K.; Bi, H.; Xu, H. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of HAK/KUP/KT Potassium Transporters Gene Family in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Amirbakhtiar, N.; Ismaili, A.; Ghaffari, M.R.; Nazarian Firouzabadi, F.; Shobbar, Z.S. Transcriptome response of roots to salt stress in a salinity-tolerant bread wheat cultivar. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, Y.; Guo, Y. Unraveling salt stress signaling in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kurotani, K.I.; Hattori, T.; Takeda, S. Overexpression of a CYP94 family gene CYP94C2b increases internode length and plant height in rice. Plant Signal Behav. 2015, 10, e1046667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ahmad, R.M.; Cheng, C.; Sheng, J.; Wang, W.; Ren, H.; Aslam, M.; Yan, Y. Interruption of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis Causes Differential Responses in the Roots and Shoots of Maize Seedlings against Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 6202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Miransari, M.; Smith, D. Sustainable wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in saline fields: A review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 999–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hussain, S.; Shaukat, M.; Ashraf, M.; Zhu, C.; Jin, Q.; Zhang, J. Salinity Stress in Arid and Semi-Arid Climates: Effects and Management in Field Crops. In Climate Change and Agriculture; Hussain, S., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 201–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Neilson, E.H.; Edwards, A.M.; Blomstedt, C.K.; Berger, B.; Moller, B.L.; Gleadow, R.M. Utilization of a high-throughput shoot imaging system to examine the dynamic phenotypic responses of a C4 cereal crop plant to nitrogen and water deficiency over time. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 1817–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Al-Tamimi, N.; Brien, C.; Oakey, H.; Berger, B.; Saade, S.; Ho, Y.S.; Schmockel, S.M.; Tester, M.; Negrao, S. Salinity tolerance loci revealed in rice using high-throughput non-invasive phenotyping. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Tilbrook, J.; Schilling, R.K.; Berger, B.; Garcia, A.F.; Trittermann, C.; Coventry, S.; Rabie, H.; Brien, C.; Nguyen, M.; Tester, M.; et al. Variation in shoot tolerance mechanisms not related to ion toxicity in barley. Funct. Plant Biol. 2017, 44, 1194–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Atieno, J.; Li, Y.; Langridge, P.; Dowling, K.; Brien, C.; Berger, B.; Varshney, R.K.; Sutton, T. Exploring genetic variation for salinity tolerance in chickpea using image-based phenotyping. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liang, W.; Ma, X.; Wan, P.; Liu, L. Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: A review. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 495, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Munns, R.; Passioura, J.B.; Colmer, T.D.; Byrt, C.S. Osmotic adjustment and energy limitations to plant growth in saline soil. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1091–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Adhikary, D.; Das, D.; Ali, M.Y.; Ullah, H.; Datta, A. Growth, grain yield, and water productivity of traditional rice landraces from coastal Bangladesh, as affected by salt stress. J. Crop. Improv. 2022, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Azam, A.K.M.F.; Hasan, M.F.; Khan, M.N.S.; Ghosh, S.; Saha, M.; Zabir, A.A. Salt Tolerance of Papaya (Carica Papaya), Indian Spinach (Basella Alba L.) and Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus) in the South Central Coastal Region of Bangladesh. J. Agrofor. Environ. 2022, 15, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mashfiqur, R.; Mustafa, K.S.; Tazreen, S.M.; Shahriar, K.; Abu, R.M.; Fadrus, A.N.; Harunor, R. Performance of mustard varieties under saline prone areas of Bangladesh. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2022, 18, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Rahman, M.M.; Hossain, M.; Hossain, K.F.B.; Sikder, M.T.; Shammi, M.; Rasheduzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Alam, A.M.; Uddin, M.K. Effects of NaCl-Salinity on Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Plants in a Pot Experiment. Open Agric. 2018, 3, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mahmud Ur, R.; Naser, I.B.; Mahmud, N.U.; Sarker, A.; Hoque, M.N.; Islam, T. A Highly Salt-Tolerant Bacterium Brevibacterium sediminis Promotes the Growth of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Seedlings. Stresses 2022, 2, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Devi, A.R.; Kotoky, R.; Pandey, P.; Sharma, G.D. Application of Bacillus Spp. for Sustainable Cultivation of Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) and the Benefits. In Bacilli and Agrobiotechnology; Islam, M.T., Rahman, M., Pandey, P., Jha, C.K., Aeron, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 185–211. ISBN 978-3-319-44408-6. [Google Scholar]
  86. Hossain, M.T.; Islam, T. Amelioration of Salinity Stress by Bacillus Species as Promoters of Plant Growth in Saline Soil. In Bacilli in Agrobiotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 199–208. [Google Scholar]
  87. Lethin, J.; Byrt, C.; Berger, B.; Brien, C.; Jewell, N.; Roy, S.; Mousavi, H.; Sukumaran, S.; Olsson, O.; Aronsson, H. Improved Salinity Tolerance-Associated Variables Observed in EMS Mutagenized Wheat Lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bai, Y.; Yan, Y.; Zuo, W.; Gu, C.; Xue, W.; Mei, L.; Shan, Y.; Feng, K. Coastal Mudflat Saline Soil Amendment by Dairy Manure and Green Manuring. Int. J. Agron. 2017, 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shammi, M.; Anirban, D.; Salma, U.; Sakib, A.; Rahman, M. Effectiveness of Adaptation Measures for Reducing the Effect of Salinity Intrusion in Agriculture Practice: A Case study from Kolapara Upazila, Bangladesh. Bangladesh J. Environ. Res. 2020, 11, 38–54. [Google Scholar]
  90. Shammi, M.; Karmakar, B.; Rahman, M.M.; Islam, M.S.; Rahman, R.; Uddin, M.K. Assessment of salinity hazard of irrigation water quality in monsoon season of Batiaghata Upazila, Khulna District, Bangladesh and adaptation strategies. Pollution 2016, 2, 183–197. [Google Scholar]
  91. Hossain, M.A.R.; Ahmed, M.; Ojea, E.; Fernandes, J.A. Impacts and responses to environmental change in coastal livelihoods of south-west Bangladesh. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 637–638, 954–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hasan, M.K.; Kumar, L. Changes in coastal farming systems in a changing climate in Bangladesh. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2022, 22, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rahman, M.S.; Kazal, M.M.H.; Rayhan, S.J. Impacts of the training of mud crab farmers: An adaptation strategy to cope with salinity intrusion in Bangladesh. Mar. Policy 2020, 120, 104159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rahman, M.M.; Haque, S.M.; Islam, M.A.; Paul, A.K.; Iqbal, S.; Atique, U.; Wahab, A.; Egna, H.; Brown, C. Assessment of mud crab fattening and culture practices in coastal Bangladesh: Understanding the current technologies and development perspectives. Aquac. Aquar. Conserv. Legislation 2020, 2, 582–596. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ferdoushi, Z.; Xiang-Guo, Z. An assessment on the barriers in mud crab (Scylla sp.) fattening and marketing in Bangladesh. J. Sci. Technol. 2013, 11, 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  96. Salam, M.A.; Ross, L.G.; Beveridge, C.M.M. A comparison of development opportunities for crab and shrimp aquaculture in southwestern Bangladesh, using GIS modelling. Aquaculture 2003, 220, 477–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rahi, M.L.; Ferdusy, T.; Wali Ahmed, S.; Khan, M.N.; Aziz, D.; Salin, K.R. Impact of salinity changes on growth, oxygen consumption and expression pattern of selected candidate genes in the orange mud crab (Scylla olivacea). Aquac. Res. 2020, 51, 4290–4301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sujan, M.H.K.; Kazal, M.M.H.; Ali, M.S.; Rahman, M.S. Cost-benefit analysis of mud crab fattening in coastal areas of Bangladesh. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 19, 100612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rahman, M.M.; Haque, S.M.; Galib, S.M.; Islam, M.A.; Parvez, M.T.; Hoque, M.N.; Wahab, M.A.; Egna, H.; Brown, C. Mud crab fishery in climate vulnerable coastal Bangladesh: An analysis towards sustainable development. Aquac. Int. 2020, 28, 1243–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chang, Z.Q.; Neori, A.; He, Y.Y.; Li, J.T.; Qiao, L.; Preston, S.I.; Liu, P.; Li, J. Development and current state of seawater shrimp farming, with an emphasis on integrated multi-trophic pond aquaculture farms, in China—A review. Rev. Aquac. 2020, 12, 2544–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rahman, M.M.; Haque, S.M.; Wahab, A.; Egna, H.; Brown, C. Soft-shell crab production in coastal Bangladesh: Prospects, challenges and sustainability. World Aquac. 2018, 49, 43–47. [Google Scholar]
  102. Basu, S.; Roy, A. Economic assessment of mud crab (Scylla Serrata) culture as an adaptation strategy to salinity intrusion in south-west region of Bangladesh. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 75, 891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lahiri, T.; Nazrul, K.M.S.; Rahman, M.A.; Saha, D.; Egna, H.; Wahab, M.A.; Mamun, A.A. Boom and bust: Soft-shell mud crab farming in south-east coastal Bangladesh. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 5056–5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bianchi, E.; Malki-Epshtein, L. Evaluating the risk to Bangladeshi coastal infrastructure from tropical cyclones under climate change. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 57, 102147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Urruty, N.; Tailliez-Lefebvre, D.; Huyghe, C. Stability, robustness, vulnerability and resilience of agricultural systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Islam, M.A.; Lobry de Bruyn, L.; Warwick, N.W.M.; Koech, R. Salinity-affected threshold yield loss: A signal of adaptation tipping points for salinity management of dry season rice cultivation in the coastal areas of Bangladesh. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 288, 112413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Jamal, M.R.; Kristiansen, P.; Kabir, M.J.; de Bruyn, L.L. Risks and adaptation dynamics in shrimp and prawn-based farming systems in southwest coastal Bangladesh. Aquaculture 2023, 562, 738819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g001 550
Figure 1. Pathway of salinity intrusion (Source: Modified from [10]).
Figure 1. Pathway of salinity intrusion (Source: Modified from [10]).
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g001
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g002 550
Figure 2. Map of coastal areas of Bangladesh (Source: Authors, 2023).
Figure 2. Map of coastal areas of Bangladesh (Source: Authors, 2023).
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g002
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g003 550
Figure 3. Review framework adopted for this study.
Figure 3. Review framework adopted for this study.
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g003
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g004 550
Figure 4. Saline-affected areas of the coastal region in 1973, 2000, 2009, and 2022.
Figure 4. Saline-affected areas of the coastal region in 1973, 2000, 2009, and 2022.
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g004
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g005 550
Figure 5. A summarized impact of salinity on crop production and the subsequent impact on food security (Source: Authors, 2022).
Figure 5. A summarized impact of salinity on crop production and the subsequent impact on food security (Source: Authors, 2022).
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g005
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g006 550
Figure 6. A conceptual model for changing aquaculture and farming systems modified to suit the environment and climate change adaptation based on a solution of nature-based local resources. + means a positive environmental impact while − means a broadly negative environmental impact.
Figure 6. A conceptual model for changing aquaculture and farming systems modified to suit the environment and climate change adaptation based on a solution of nature-based local resources. + means a positive environmental impact while − means a broadly negative environmental impact.
Hydrobiology 02 00011 g006
Table
Table 1. Satellite image analysis of land conversion trends in different studies.
Table 1. Satellite image analysis of land conversion trends in different studies.
Districts/RegionChange of Crop CultivationLand use Change Shrimp/Prawn Ghers/PondsOthersMethod of StudyReferences
Satkhira Tala Upazila--0.7% of the study area (246 ha) was underwater in 198989% inundation by salt water inundation in 201564.4% reduction of fallow lands from 1989–2015LULC analysis 1989–2015, FGD[7]
Khulna
(Tildanga and Kamarkhola)		Paddy 37.2% in 198818% in 2017ponds/waterbodies 16.5% in 198833.9% in 2017-LULC analysis 1988–2017[28]
South-west coast --14,773 ton in 1986–1987to140,261 ton in 2012–13-Production 1986–2012[29]
South-west coastAman rice 47%Aman 27%Prawn 0.4%Prawn 7%Fallow land 30% in 1991 to 12% in 2018Cropping intensity 1991–2018[12]
Boro 5%Boro 22%Shrimp 8% Shrimp 17%-
Aus 4%Aus 2%Non rice crop 6%Non rice crop 11%-
Satkhira district--22% in 199038% in 2016-LULC analysis 1990–2016[8]
Satkhira district
(Assasuni Upazila)		--21% bare lands transformed into Shrimp lands25.9% increase in shrimp lands-LULC analysis 1989–2015[13]
Coastal districts and islands--Aquaculture has increased by more than 100% by converting water bodies (61%) and fallow land (27%).-47% decrease of fallow land from 1990–2015LULC analysis 1990–2015 and interview method[30]
Table
Table 2. The biophysical and hydrobiological limits of agroecological systems in the south-west region of Bangladesh.
Table 2. The biophysical and hydrobiological limits of agroecological systems in the south-west region of Bangladesh.
Ecosystem TempSalinityRemarksFactors to considerReferences
Agriculture 28 °C air
✓
4dS/m (soil)
Decreased due to high salinity and climate changeIrrigation water unavailability, surface and groundwater salinity
Saline-tolerant crop species		[26,92,101]
Fisheries27–29 °C water
✓
0–5 ppt (water)
Freshwater fisheries also decreased due to high salinity, climate changeSaline surface water, less profit[26,92]
Shrimp25–32 °C water
✓
7.80–39 dS/m or between 10 to 20% salinity
✓
Diseases, Environmental degradation, social conflicts
✓
Cultivation decreased in Khulna and Chittagong
✓
High saline environment
✓
Operational facilities and poor quality control and quality assurances (QC & QA)
✓
Failure in export
✓
Less profit
[26,92,101]
Mud crab (Scylla serrata)22–30 °C water
✓
Tolerate a wide range of salinity (3 to 35%), even still grows in 0% salinity but below the average productivity.
✓
10‰–20‰ salinity is optimum for good production
✓
Increased cultivation in Cox’s bazar and Satkhira
✓
hardy nature
✓
easy farming techniques
✓
low investment and production cost
✓
lower susceptibility to diseases
✓
women can participate
✓
eco-friendly
✓
integrated with horticulture, forestry, rice farming, finfish and shrimp species
✓
3 weeks (fattening) to 6 months (grow-out adult) harvest time
✓
2018–19—exported USD 42.9 million live and frozen crabs to 17 countries
✓
low-quality feed is acceptable
✓
comparatively minimum icing and processing than shrimp
✓
less competition with other species
✓
more resistance to adverse conditions
✓
Wasted crab shells require management but can be made into value-added products
✓
Seed supply
✓
Operational facilities
✓
QC & QA
✓
Wild seed collection
✓
Land use
✓
Infrastructure
✓
Soil quality
✓
Water sources
✓
Seed sources
✓
Market facilities
✓
Support services
[93,97,98,101,102,103]
Table
Table 3. Adaptation techniques in the changing saline ecosystem.
Table 3. Adaptation techniques in the changing saline ecosystem.
RegionsAdaptation MethodsAssessment TypesReferences
Satkhira (Shyamnagar Upazila)Fish polycultureEconomic assessment[33]
Both south-east and south-west coastChanges in farming systemsRandom questionnaire survey and random forest classification model[92]
South-west
coast: Khulna, Bagerhat, and Satkhira		Adaptation pathways for salinisationRandom household interview, key informant interview and DPSIR analysis[2]
Satkhira and ChittagongAdaptation tipping points
approach to investigate threshold yield loss		Semi-structured interview, key informant interview[106]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akter, R.; Hasan, N.; Reza, F.; Asaduzzaman, M.; Begum, K.; Shammi, M. Hydrobiology of Saline Agriculture Ecosystem: A Review of Scenario Change in South-West Region of Bangladesh. Hydrobiology 2023, 2, 162-180. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010011

AMA Style

Akter R, Hasan N, Reza F, Asaduzzaman M, Begum K, Shammi M. Hydrobiology of Saline Agriculture Ecosystem: A Review of Scenario Change in South-West Region of Bangladesh. Hydrobiology. 2023; 2(1):162-180. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akter, Rayhana, Nazmul Hasan, Farhadur Reza, Md. Asaduzzaman, Kohinoor Begum, and Mashura Shammi. 2023. "Hydrobiology of Saline Agriculture Ecosystem: A Review of Scenario Change in South-West Region of Bangladesh" Hydrobiology 2, no. 1: 162-180. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010011

APA Style

Akter, R., Hasan, N., Reza, F., Asaduzzaman, M., Begum, K., & Shammi, M. (2023). Hydrobiology of Saline Agriculture Ecosystem: A Review of Scenario Change in South-West Region of Bangladesh. Hydrobiology, 2(1), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrobiology2010011

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop