Next Article in Journal
Milk Fat Depression in Dairy Cattle: Etiology, Prevention, and Recovery Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Natural Feed Additives in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review of Efficiency and Sustainability in Ruminant Production
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spineless Cactus (Opuntia stricta and Nopalea cochenillifera) with Added Sugar Cane (Saccharum officinarum) Bagasse Silage as Bovine Feed in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region

by
Iran Alves Torquato
1,2,
Cleber Thiago Ferreira Costa
2,
Meirielly Santos Jesus
3,
Fernando Mata
3,4,
Joana Santos
3,
Hortência E. Pereira Santana
1,5,
Daniel Pereira Silva
1,3,5,6,7,* and
Denise Santos Ruzene
1,3,5,6
1
Northeastern Biotechnology Network—RENORBIO, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49107-230, SE, Brazil
2
Federal Institute of the Sertão Pernambucano, Pernambuco 56400-000, PE, Brazil
3
CISAS—Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal
4
Estação Zootécnica Nacional, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, 2005-424 Vale de Santarém, Portugal
5
Graduate Program in Biotechnology—PROBIO, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49107-230, SE, Brazil
6
Center for Exact Sciences and Technology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49107-230, SE, Brazil
7
PPGPI—Graduate Program in Intellectual Property Science, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49107-230, SE, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ruminants 2025, 5(3), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030037
Submission received: 4 July 2025 / Revised: 1 August 2025 / Accepted: 5 August 2025 / Published: 8 August 2025

Simple Summary

This study examined the effectiveness of silage made from spineless forage cactus mixed with sugarcane bagasse as animal feed. Good feed is essential for healthy and productive livestock, especially in areas where food quality fluctuates significantly. Different amounts of bagasse were tested (0, 150, 300, 450, and 600 g/kg dry matter), mixed with cactus and a small amount of urea. It was found that silage made only from cactus produced gas differently from silage with bagasse, which showed very little gas production at first. Adding bagasse reduced how well the silage broke down in the lab, lowering its dry and organic matter digestibility and gas production as bagasse levels increased. However, silage with 150 g/kg of bagasse treated with urea provided a good balance between the required energy and fiber. Overall, this cactus–bagasse mix could be a low-cost, sustainable feed option for ruminant animals.

Abstract

The success of optimal ruminant production relies heavily on feed efficiency to deliver the necessary nutrients to animals. Nutritional deficiencies in livestock pose a significant challenge in regions experiencing prolonged fluctuations in resource availability and quality. In this context, the present study aimed to investigate the cumulative gas production (CGP) and in vitro degradability of silages made from spineless forage cactus (a native species) combined with high-fiber ingredients, to evaluate their viability as a sustainable, low-cost alternative to animal feed. The experiment involved ensiling spineless cactus genotypes with varying levels of sugarcane bagasse (0, 150, 300, 450, and 600 g/kg of dry matter) and a 1% urea–ammonium sulfate solution. The results indicated that for all genotypes studied, the CGP curves from silage composed solely of forage cactus differed significantly from those containing bagasse, which exhibited an initial phase characterized by little or no gas production. In vitro degradability was negatively influenced by the inclusion of bagasse at any level, resulting in decreased dry matter and organic matter degradability, as well as reduced CGP with increasing bagasse concentration. Therefore, the study demonstrated that the proposed combination of ingredients represents a promising sustainable feed supplement to enhance animal nutrition. Silage containing 150 g/kg of bagasse treated with urea offers a favorable balance between the energy required by rumen microflora and the benefits of fiber presence.

1. Introduction

Livestock farming is an important socio-economic activity that supports many livelihoods in the Brazilian semi-arid region (Figure 1). Certain animal species, such as small ruminants, are well adapted to harsh environmental conditions, making them more resilient to the impacts of the climate change characteristic of the area [1]. However, since ruminant production systems in these regions rely primarily on forage plants, they are highly dependent on edaphoclimatic conditions [2]. The semi-arid climate is marked by prolonged dry seasons that exceed the length of the rainy periods, leading to difficulties in forage and grain production for animal feed and often resulting in economic vulnerability [3].
To address the challenges posed by limited water resources and their impact on productivity, researchers have investigated and adjusted various factors to improve outcomes in arid environments [4]. Understanding the dynamics of the livestock feed supply chain in relation to specific soil and climate conditions allows for the optimization of production yields (e.g., pasture capacity) while minimizing environmental degradation [5]. Effective management of resources naturally suited to the local semi-arid climate has proven to be the most appropriate strategy. If developing breeding strategies can overcome some problems [6], conserving and expanding the cultivation of native forage species helps meet the nutritional needs of livestock while supporting the sustainability and viability of production systems [5]. These diverse local forages are rich in essential nutrients and can offer a balanced diet, reducing dependence on commercial feed.
In this context, several alternative feeds have been proposed to replace traditional forages and starchy grains. Notable examples are the spineless cactus, Opuntia stricta Haw., and the Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dyck, which have been identified as valuable components of ruminant fodder in arid and semi-arid regions [7]. In addition to their drought resistance and high potential for dry matter (DM) production per hectare, these cacti offers benefits such as high palatability and substantial nutritive value, including important levels of non-fiber carbohydrates (NFCs) (approximately 500 g/kg DM), water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) (150 g/kg) and total carbohydrates (TCs) (617–711 g/kg) [8,9]. However, the low concentrations of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) (approximately 250 g/kg) and crude protein (CP) (33 to 44 g/kg) [8] in cactus limit its use as a sole roughage source in ruminant diets. As a result, it is often necessary to combine it with other feed components to compensate for these nutritional deficiencies and create a balanced diet.
Mixing spineless cactus with plants rich in fiber or protein can help compensate for cactus’s low DM content and improve its suitability for ensiling, a common technique used to store and preserve excess forage produced during wet seasons. This preserved forage can then be used to feed livestock during periods of scarcity [9]. Godoi et al. [10] explored the use of a mixed silage comprising spineless cactus and tropical forage plants (pornuça and gliricidia), in a 60:40 dry matter (DM) proportion, for feeding sheep. They demonstrated that this association improved nutrient intake and digestibility compared to using only cactus silage, which had an NFC content exceeding the recommended level in ruminant feed and a reduction in CP digestibility.
Non-fiber carbohydrates serve as a primary, readily available energy source due to their high digestibility and rapid degradation rate [11]. These carbohydrates play a key role in maximizing microbial protein synthesis and overall energy intake in ruminants. Among these carbohydrates, mucilage is present as a heterogeneous polysaccharide that functions as a hydrocolloid gum. This offers flexibility and high water retention capacity to the plant [12]. However, diets with high NFC levels can lead to acidosis [13], a condition that intensifies rumen fermentation and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production, resulting in a decrease in ruminal pH and imbalances in ruminal microbial flora and performance [14]. In contrast, fiber promotes chewing and rumination, which stimulate saliva secretion. Saliva helps neutralize ruminal acidity, thereby mitigating the negative effects of high NFC levels. This behavior supports proper rumen motility and fosters an environment conducive to improved microbial development and reproductive performance. Achieving optimal rumen health and metabolism requires a careful balance between energy-dense nutrients and dietary fiber [15].
Sustainable tropical forages can provide the necessary fiber to complement spineless cactus, including agro-industrial residues and crop by-products. Sugarcane bagasse, a byproduct of the sugar-alcohol industry and one of the most abundant agro-residues in Brazil, can be efficiently used as a sustainable fiber supplement. To maintain a low-cost and efficient diet, urea can be incorporated as a non-protein nitrogen (NPN) source to compensate for protein deficiencies in diets based on bagasse and forage cactus [16]. The combination of highly digestible carbohydrates, physically effective fiber, and NPN promotes energy–nitrogen synchronization, improving nutrient utilization and consequently animal performance [17].
Several studies have investigated the combination of forage cactus and sugarcane bagasse silage as a feed for ruminants, demonstrating improvements in animal performance and the provision of necessary nutritive value without compromising animal health. For instance, Lima et al. [18] evaluated four different fiber sources (corn silage, sorghum, hay, and bagasse) in combination with cactus for dairy goats. Similarly, Silva et al. [19] assessed the impact of different levels of full-fat corn germ when combined with bagasse and cactus. Siqueira et al. [20], and Siqueira et al. [21] explored the use of two types of cactus with bagasse, comparing them to traditional silages. Furthermore, Medeiros et al. [22] and Ribeiro et al. [23] proposed the replacement of corn silage with cactus and bagasse in the diets of dairy cows and sheep. However, none of the reported studies have compared different levels of sugarcane bagasse and cactus in silages without the impact of other traditional roughage ingredients, such as Tifton hay and corn silage.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of varying levels of urea-treated bagasse on the silages of three spineless cactus genotypes (Orelha de Elefante Mexicana-Opuntia stricta Haw., Miúda-Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dick, and Baiana-Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dick) with respect to ruminal fermentation kinetics and degradability, as estimated through in vitro cumulative gas production. The proper combination of cactus with sugarcane and urea can provide nutritional value similar to traditional roughages, providing energy and avoiding acidosis. The species Opuntia stricta and Nopalea cochenillifera are among the most cultivated in the semi-arid region due to their incredible adaptability to climatic conditions and their high productivity potential, even in comparison to other cacti. Both are utilized as animal feed, providing a short vegetative cycle and quick returns from an agronomic perspective. Particularly in the Brazilian semi-arid regions (caatinga), these species are emphasized due to their high resilience to stresses within productive systems, highlighting the interaction between species and systems [24,25].
This research is distinctive in providing a comprehensive comparative analysis of different bagasse inclusion levels and cactus genotypes to assess their impact on ruminal fermentation. This in-depth analysis can be decisive in selecting appropriate ingredient proportions for optimal feed formulations.

2. Materials and Methods

The experiments were conducted at the Food Analysis Laboratory of the Pernambuco Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology (Pernambuco, Brazil). The treatments consisted of forage cactus silage combined with five levels of sugarcane bagasse (0, 150, 300, 450, and 600 g/kg DM) and a 1% urea–ammonium sulfate solution (9:1 ratio). Three spineless forage cactus genotypes were used: Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (Opuntia stricta Haw., referred to as Mexicana), Miúda (Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dick), and Baiana (Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dick). This study evaluated various cactus genotypes to assess how their distinct chemical compositions affect their effectiveness as energy sources. Although all were cactus, genotypic differences were expected. Sugarcane was added as a fiber source to improve the overall content. The selected sugarcane levels were based on the recommended fiber threshold, ensuring they did not exceed 60% or 600 g/kg [26].
The ingredients were analyzed for dry matter (DM) (method 920.39), organic matter (OM) and mineral matter (MM) (method 942.05), ether extract (EE) (method 920.39), and crude protein (CP) (method 954.01), according to the methodology of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists [27]. The determination of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), cellulose (CEL), hemicellulose (HEM), and lignin (LIG) was performed following the procedures described by Detmann et al. [28], adapted from Van Soest [29,30]. The results of individual ingredient compositions are presented in Table 1, while Table 2 displays the composition of the treatment combining cactus genotypes and sugarcane at various levels.
The proportions of total carbohydrates (TCs) and non-fiber carbohydrates (NFCs), also shown in Table 1, were estimated based on the assumption that the sum of carbohydrates, fiber, ash, ether extract, and crude protein represents the complete centesimal composition of the feed [28]. The total carbohydrates were calculated using the equation TC (%) = 100 – [CP + EE + MM], as suggested by Sniffen et al. [31], and NFC using the formula proposed by Weiss et al. [32]: NFC (%) = 100 – [NDF + CP + EE + MM].
Silages were prepared in 4 L-capacity PVC microsilos. Each treatment, containing specific ingredient proportions, was ensiled for 60 days. The experiment assessed ruminal fermentation kinetics using the semi-automatic in vitro gas production technique [33]. Samples (1 g) were incubated in 160 mL glass flasks pre-flushed with CO2 and stored at 4 °C to prevent undesirable fermentation before inoculation. Five hours before the start of the experiment, the flasks were transferred from the refrigerator to an oven at 39 °C, where they remained until inoculation.
The ruminal inoculum was obtained from five bovines after slaughter and evisceration at a slaughterhouse in Floresta (Pernambuco, Brazil). These animals were part of the municipal slaughter routine. The bovines were fed a diet of forage cactus, sugarcane bagasse, Tifton hay, and urea for 15 days prior to slaughter. The procedure is considered normal husbandry practice and does not rase any ethical concerns. As such, ethical approval was waived by the Ethics Committee (ORBEA) of IPVC. In the laboratory, the rumen fluid was filtered through cotton gauze under continuous CO2 flushing and maintained in a water bath at 39 °C. Control samples consisted of flasks containing only rumen fluid and culture medium (90 mL), prepared following the methodology of Theodorou et al. [34]. The culture medium consisted of macro- and micro-mineral solutions, resazurin, and a bicarbonate buffer solution (NH4HCO3, NaHCO3, and distilled water). Oxygen levels in the medium were decreased by adding a solution containing cysteine–HCl and Na2S [35].
For analysis and experiment monitoring, the flasks were removed from incubation after intervals of 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h of fermentation. All treatments were replicated 10 times, and in every pre-defined interval, the volume of generated biogas of two samples per treatment was measured, totaling 150 experimental samples. To determine dry matter (DM) content, residues were filtered in crucibles with porosity 1 (Pirex-Vidrotec, São Paulo, Brazil) and dried in an oven at 100 °C for 48 h. The pressure of the gases accumulated in each sample was measured using a pressure transducer (Pressurte Press DATA 800, LANA, CENA-USP, Piracicaba, Brazil) connected to a needle (0.6 mm). The obtained pressure (P) (pounds per square inch) was converted into the volume of gas (mL) through the quadratic equation V (mL) = 0.17454 P2 + 0.00315, as suggested by Pereira et al. [36]. Correlations were estimated between the in vitro and in vivo results.
The cumulative gas production data were analyzed using a bicompartmental model proposed by Schofield et al. [37]:
V t = V f 1 [ 1 + e 2 4 × m 1 L T ] + V f 2 [ 1 + e 2 4 × m 2 L T ]
in which V(t) = total maximal volume of gases produced; Vf1= maximal volume of gas for the rapidly digested fraction (NFC); Vf2= maximal volume of gas for the slowly digested fraction (FC); m1 = specific growth rate for the rapidly degraded fraction (NFC); m2= specific growth rate for the slowly degraded fraction (FC); L= duration of the initial events of digestion (colonization time); T= fermenting time
Statistical analyses were performed using the NLIN (nonlinear regression) procedure in SAS version 9.1 [38]. The cumulative gas production data were also analyzed using the PROC MIXED procedure in SAS version 9.1 [38], with a significance level of 0.05 for type I error. Means were compared using Dunnett’s test and orthogonal contrasts. The contrasts applied were as follows:
  • I—Linear effect of sugarcane bagasse level;
  • II—Quadratic effect of sugarcane bagasse level;
  • III—Cubic effect of sugarcane bagasse level.

3. Results

Table 3 and Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the variation in cumulative gas production (CGP) with the inclusion of sugarcane bagasse in forage cactus silage, where all evaluated genotypes were significantly affected. The highest CGP values were observed with the inclusion of 150 g/kg of bagasse. As the bagasse level increased, CGP values declined, reaching the lowest point at 450 g/kg for Mexicana and at 600 g/kg for Miúda and Baiana.
Among the three evaluated forage cactus genotypes, the inclusion of bagasse at any level negatively affected silage dry matter (DM) and organic matter (OM) degradability, both of which decreased as the bagasse content increased. The highest in vitro degradability coefficients of DM were recorded in silages without bagasse: 823.9 g/kg DM for Baiana and 862.29 g/kg DM for Miúda. The lowest degradability value was 116.6 g/kg DM in Baiana silage with 600 g/kg of bagasse.
The maximum in vitro degradability of organic matter (IVDOM) was 956.29 g/kg DM for Baiana and 922.29 g/kg DM for Mexicana. In contrast, the lowest IVDOM was 199.47 g/kg DM, observed in Miúda silage with 600 g/kg of bagasse included (Table 4).

4. Discussion

This study examined the effect of ensiling forage cactus with four different levels of bagasse on cumulative gas production (CGP) and the degradability of dry and organic matter. As shown in the CGP curves in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4, the addition of bagasse decreases CGP across all evaluated forage cactus genotypes. A statistical analysis revealed a significant linear negative correlation between OM and DM degradability and bagasse level (Table 4). After analysis, the regression results showed that the linear model consistently demonstrated a clear inverse relationship: when the bagasse level increased, the degradability and CGP decreased proportionally.
Gas production in the rumen is a direct result of the fermentation process by rumen microbes, wherein fast-degrading carbohydrates are primarily converted into volatile fatty acids (acetate, propionate, and butyrate), and gases such as methane and carbon dioxide [39]. Gas production can be impacted by lowering the NFC content and when carbohydrates are primarily fermented by lactic acid bacteria (LAB), leading to the inhibition of methanogens [39]. In this study, the observed gas reduction was primarily attributed to the addition of bagasse, which lowered the NFC content. The observed high in vitro digestibility in treatments with lower levels of bagasse reflects a positive correlation between gas production and OM and DM degradability. A significant interaction (p < 0.05) was also observed between incubation time and treatments (Table 3). The notable effect of time is clear in the cumulative gas production curves.
Analysis of the cumulative gas curves revealed significant differences between silages with bagasse inclusion and those composed solely of forage cactus, although differences among genotypes were relatively minor. Nonetheless, the influence of NFC concentration was also observed when comparing cactus genotypes, with Baiana, which had the highest NFC content, showing slightly higher cumulative gas production (Table 2). These observations support the observation that the higher the concentration of NFC in cactus-based silage, the higher the gas production.
The cactus genotype is particularly rich in heteropolysaccharides, mucilage, and cell-wall pectin [40]. Magalhães et al. [41] reported that Napolea cochenillifera Salm-Dick and Opuntia stricta Haw have pectic contents of 382 and 155 g/kg DM, respectively, which positively influences gas production from fermentable carbohydrates [13,42]. Furthermore, an increase in indigestible components at the expense of NFC, protein, and other nutrients compromises the energy substrate available to ruminal microorganisms, hindering microbial protein synthesis [43]. Consequently, the inclusion of bagasse, which dilutes the proportion of cactus, limits the availability of degradable carbohydrates and organic matter, reducing the energy content and thus microbial growth.
Several factors influence feed degradability rates, including feed composition, particle size, the physical properties of the fiber, microbial populations, and the degradability of the plant cell wall [44]. However, low concentrations of NDF, ADF, and lignin along with a high carbohydrate fraction are expected to contribute to greater degradation and consequently increased gas production [41,42]. Some reduction in organic matter degradability in diets containing forage cactus may be explained by insufficient ruminal ammonia nitrogen, especially when combined with high fiber content. This is critical because cellulolytic microorganisms rely on both ruminal ammonia and carbon skeletons to stimulate microbial protein synthesis. Additionally, synchronization between energy molecules and proteins is crucial for maximizing microbial efficiency [45].
For samples containing only Baiana, Mexicana, or Miúda cactus, the initial phase was characterized by little or no gas production, followed by a rapid increase during the second phase, which lasted from 12 to 72 h, indicative of effective enzymatic breakdown. The expected decline in gas production rate, marking the asymptotic phase, began after 72 h of incubation. During the initial hours of fermentation, the digestible components of the substrate are immediately fermented. As the process continues, a small amount of material becomes hydrated and colonized by rumen microorganisms. These microorganisms generate varying degradation rates, dependent on the concentration of carbohydrates and the structural composition of the substrate [46]. Pure cactus silage exhibited similar fermentation behavior but with differences in value attributed to its distinct fermentable carbohydrate content and the presence of structural materials, as reported in Table 1.
In treatments with bagasse addition, a similar trend was observed; however, the initial phase was extended up to 36 h. The exponential phase then occurred between 36 and 72 h, followed by the asymptotic phase beginning after 72 h. The delayed initiation of gas production, with a longer lag phase, highlights the influence of the fiber content in the different treatments. The treatments based on the qq genotype showed an even more extended lag phase, likely due to its lower NFC content. All treatments with bagasse and Mexicana genotypes showed little gas production. Even at the lower tested inclusion level (150 g/kg), bagasse presence had a drastic impact on gas production when mixed with the Mexicana genotype, showing only slight gas production in both the initial fermentation phase and after substrate degradation by rumen microorganisms. As mentioned, the measured gas volume corresponds to the portion of the material that was digested. A higher lignin content increases the indigestible fraction of dry matter, thereby reducing the substrate’s degradability rate. Thus, fibrous feeds rich in lignin, such as bagasse, are closely associated with reduced degradability and prolonged incubation periods. Moreover, NFCs are primarily responsible for gas production during the first 12 h of incubation, a critical period for microbial growth.
The degradation curves for Miúda + bagasse silage displayed different patterns. The treatments with 850 g/kg of Miúda and 150 g/kg of bagasse showed initial fermentation periods from 0 to 33 h and 0 to 18 h, respectively, followed by exponential phases from 33 to 48 h and 18 to 48 h. Both treatments exhibited a decline in gas production after 48 h of incubation. Baiana samples were found to be less impacted by the inclusion of bagasse when compared to Mexicana and Miúda at all levels of treatment, although the presence of bagasse also led to a decrease in gas production, especially when combined with 450 g/kg and 600 g/kg bagasse. As expected, the higher the bagasse content, the lower the total cumulative gas production. The CGP, fermentation, and substrate degradation curves exhibit a sigmoidal shape, typically characterized by three distinct phases: the initial phase (hydration, microbial attachment, and colonization), the exponential phase (rapid gas production due to enzymatic degradation), and the asymptotic phase (slowing gas production) [47].
The effect of bagasse in reducing DM and OM degradability, and consequently CGP, is attributed to the low degree of synchronization between the energy and nitrogen released to cellulolytic bacterial populations in the rumen [48]. Bacterial species that degrade soluble carbohydrates typically exhibit faster growth rates and higher fermentative efficiency compared to fiber-degrading bacteria. Additionally, the degradation rate depends on substrate solubility, as well as microbial growth and colonization efficiency [49].
Overall, by examining the effect of replacing varying levels of forage cactus silage (150–600 g/kg of dry DM) with sugarcane bagasse, as proposed in this study, it was possible to demonstrate that this combination holds potential as a feed supplement for animal nutrition. Among the evaluated treatments, forage cactus silage of Baiana and Miúda genotypes containing 150 g/kg DM of bagasse treated with urea showed promising results. These treatments achieved a favorable balance between readily available carbohydrates, which provide the energy needed for rumen microflora, and fiber content, which supports a healthy ruminal environment during fermentation and digestion. Although the inclusion of bagasse led to a significant decrease in CGP, DM, and OM degradability, its presence is important to avoid acidosis of ruminants. Nevertheless, future research should explore the effects of including bagasse at levels below 150 g/kg. Also, lower levels of fiber content must be explored to evaluate the performance of the Mexicana genotype, which was deeply impacted by bagasse.

5. Conclusions

The silages produced from the three evaluated spineless forage cactus genotypes have proven to be viable sustainable alternatives for animal feed. The results indicate that the inclusion of sugarcane bagasse (at any level) reduces cumulative gas production and organic matter degradability across all genotypes. However, treatments combining Baiana and Miúda forage cactus with 150 g/kg of bagasse and 1% urea can be recommended as a potential feed supplement during periods of feed scarcity, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. Meanwhile, for the Mexicana genotype, which was deeply impacted by bagasse, a lower level should be evaluated.
This combination helps fulfill energy, fiber, and non-protein nitrogen requirements in the ruminant diet while offering a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to conventional roughage sources such as corn bran and soybean meal. Additionally, such supplemented diets may contribute to mitigating greenhouse gas emissions by enabling livestock to reach slaughter weight at a younger age, thereby shortening the production cycle.

Author Contributions

I.A.T.: experimental design, sample collection, data analysis, and writing original draft; C.T.F.C.: experimental design, sample collection, and data analysis; M.S.J., F.M., J.S. and H.E.P.S.: visualization, writing—review and editing; D.P.S. and D.S.R.: project management, supervision, and manuscript revision. All authors contributed to the study conception. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the data are part of an ongoing study leading to a patent application. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial assistance from Brazilian research funding agencies such as Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—CAPES, under Finance Code 001, a Brazilian foundation within the Ministry of Education (MEC), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development—CNPq, a Brazilian foundation associated to the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI), Foundation of Support to Research and Technological Innovation of the State of Sergipe—FAPITEC/SE, and the Multiuser Chemistry Laboratories Center of the Federal University of Sergipe (CLQM/UFS). Our thanks are also extended to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support to the Center for Research and Development in Agrifood Systems and Sustainability (CISAS) [UIDB/05937/2020 (doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/05937/2020) and UIDP/05937/2020 (doi.org/10.54499/UIDP/05937/2020)].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ADFAcid detergent fiber
CELCellulose
CGPCumulative gas production
CPCrude protein
DMDry matter
EEEther extract
HEMHemicellulose
IVDDMIn vitro degradability of dry matter
IVDOMIn vitro degradability of organic matter
LIGLignin
NDFNeutral detergent fiber
NFCsNon-fiber carbohydrates
NPNNon-protein nitrogen
OMOrganic matter
TCsTotal carbohydrates
TDNsTotal digestible nutrients
VFAVolatile fatty acid

References

  1. Parsad, R.; Ahlawat, S.; Bagiyal, M.; Arora, R.; Gera, R.; Chhabra, P.; Sharma, U.; Singh, A. Climate Resilience in Goats: A Comprehensive Review of the Genetic Basis for Adaptation to Varied Climatic Conditions. Mamm. Genome 2025, 36, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Torres-Navarrete, E.D.; Sánchez-Laiño, A.R.; Verdecia-Acosta, D.M.; Ribera, J.L.; Hernández-Montiel, L.G.; Curaqueo-Fuente, G.; Zambrano-Montes, S.A. Pasture Potentialities in Family Farming Production Systems in Los Ríos Province, Ecuador, during the Summer. Enfoque UTE 2023, 14, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sintayehu, D.W.; Alemayehu, S.; Terefe, T.; Tegegne, G.; Engdaw, M.M.; Gebre, L.; Tesfaye, L.; Doyo, J.; Reddy, R.U.; Girvetz, E. Effects of Drought on Livestock Production, Market Dynamics, and Pastoralists’ Adaptation Strategies in Semi-Arid Ethiopia. Climate 2025, 13, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abd-Allah, S.; Abd-El Rahman, H.H.; Mohamed, M.I.; Abedo, A.A.; Salman, F.M.; Shoukry, M. Feeding Management of Small Ruminants as A Strategic Tool to Mitigate The Negative Impact of Climate Changes in Arid Regions of Egypt: A Case Study of Assaf Sheep. Egypt. J. Vet. Sci. 2024, 55, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hayat, M.K.; Mumtaz, M.M.; Ahsan Ali, M.; Huaira, A.; Ur Rehman, M.N.; Shabbir, M.A.; Usman, M.; Afzal, A. Optimizing Livestock Feed Systems: A Multi-Faceted Approach for Sustainable and Resilient Animal Agriculture; A Comprehensive Review. J. Plant Biota 2024, 3, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Iglesias, A.; Mata, F.; Cerqueira, J.L.; Kowalczyk, A.; Cantalapiedra, J.; Ferreiro, J.; Araújo, J. Analysis of Growth Models in Galician × Nelore Crossbred Cattle in the First Year of Life. Animals 2024, 14, 3698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cordeiro, M.W.S.; Júnior, V.R.R.; Monção, F.P.; Palma, M.N.N.; Rigueira, J.P.S.; da Cunha Siqueira Carvalho, C.; da Costa, M.D.; D’Angelo, M.F.S.V.; Costa, N.M.; de Oliveira, L.I.S. Tropical Grass Silages with Spineless Cactus in Diets of Holstein × Zebu Heifers in the Semiarid Region of Brazil. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2023, 55, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dubeux, J.C.B.; dos Santos, M.V.F.; da Cunha, M.V.; dos Santos, D.C.; de Souza, R.T.A.; de Mello, A.C.L.; de Souza, T.C. Cactus (Opuntia and Nopalea) Nutritive Value: A Review. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2021, 275, 114890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Saldanha, R.B.; de Carvalho, G.G.P.; Rodrigues, C.S.; Silva, T.V.B.S.; dos Pina, D.S.; Alba, H.D.R.; Santos, S.A.; Tosto, M.S.L.; Romão, C.d.O. The Inclusion of Pigeon Pea Hay Improves the Quality of Giant Cactus Harvested at Different Times. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garcia Rodriguez, V.; Vandestroet, L.; Abeysekara, V.C.; Ominski, K.; Bumunang, E.W.; McAllister, T.; Terry, S.; Miranda-Romero, L.A.; Stanford, K. Optimizing Silage Strategies for Sustainable Livestock Feed: Preserving Retail Food Waste. Agriculture 2024, 14, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Godoi, P.F.A.; Magalhães, A.L.R.; de Araújo, G.G.L.; de Melo, A.A.S.; Silva, T.S.; Gois, G.C.; dos Santos, K.C.; do Nascimento, D.B.; da Silva, P.B.; de Oliveira, J.S.; et al. Chemical Properties, Ruminal Fermentation, Gas Production and Digestibility of Silages Composed of Spineless Cactus and Tropical Forage Plants for Sheep Feeding. Animals 2024, 14, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Panneerselvam, S.; Palanisamy, V.; Balasubramaniam, M.; Palanisamy, S.; Jaganathan, M.; Kannan, T.A. Effect of Nonstructural Carbohydrates on Production Performance, Rumen Metabolism and Rumen Health in Lambs Fed with Isocaloric and Isonitrogenous Complete Diets. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2024, 56, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tanuwiria, U.H.; Mushawwir, A.; Yulistina, A.; Ali, N. Effect of Rumen-Degradable Protein (RDP) To Non-Fiber Carbohydrate (NFC) Ratio in Cattle Feed on NH3 Production, Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA), and Protozoal Populations: An in Vitro Study. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2025, 13, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moraïs, S.; Mizrahi, I. Islands in the Stream: From Individual to Communal Fiber Degradation in the Rumen Ecosystem. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 43, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Klevenhusen, F.; Zebeli, Q. A Review on the Potentials of Using Feeds Rich in Water-soluble Carbohydrates to Enhance Rumen Health and Sustainability of Dairy Cattle Production. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 5737–5746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marín-García, P.J.; Llobat, L.; López-Lujan, M.C.; Cambra-López, M.; Blas, E.; Pascual, J.J. Urea Nitrogen Metabolite Can Contribute to Implementing the Ideal Protein Concept in Monogastric Animals. Animals 2022, 12, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zurak, D.; Kljak, K.; Aladrović, J. Metabolism and Utilisation of Non-Protein Nitrogen Compounds in Ruminants: A Review. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2023, 24, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de Lima, I.E.; Monteiro, C.C.; Mesquita, F.T.L.; de Vasconcelos, E.Q.L.; de Souza, M.S.; dos Santos, D.S.; Ribeiro, E.F.; Santos, T.V.M.; Félix, S.B.; Herrera, A.M.; et al. Cactus Cladodes for Dairy Goats: What Is the Best Fiber Source? Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2023, 55, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. da Silva, C.S.; da Gama, M.A.S.; Silva, E.A.M.; Ribeiro, E.F.; Felix, S.B.; Monteiro, C.C.F.; Mora-Luna, R.E.; de Oliveira, J.C.V.; dos Santos, D.C.; de Ferreira, M.A. Full-Fat Corn Germ Improves the Performance and Milk Fat Yield of Girolando Cows Fed Sugarcane Bagasse and Cactus Cladodes as Forage Sources. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2024, 56, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Siqueira, M.; Chagas, J.; Monnerat, J.P.; Monteiro, C.; Mora-Luna, R.; Dubeux, J.; Dilorenzo, N.; Ruiz-Moreno, M.; Ferreira, M. Nutritive Value, In Vitro Fermentation, and Methane Production of Cactus Cladodes, Sugarcane Bagasse, and Urea. Animals 2021, 11, 1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siqueira, T.D.Q.; dos Santos Monnerat, J.P.I.; Chagas, J.C.C.; da Conceição, M.G.; de Siqueira, M.C.B.; Viana, T.B.L.; de Andrade Ferreira, M. Cactus Cladodes Associated with Urea and Sugarcane Bagasse: An Alternative to Conserved Feed in Semi-Arid Regions. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 1975–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Medeiros, I.P.S.; Guido, S.I.; Gama, M.A.S.; Silva, C.H.M.; Siqueira, M.C.B.; Silva, C.S.D.; Netto, A.J.; Felix, S.B.; Rabelo, M.N.; Santos, T.V.M. Cactus Cladodes and Sugarcane Bagasse Can Partially Replace Earless Corn Silage in Diets of Lactating Dairy Cows. Dairy 2023, 5, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. do Sacramento Ribeiro, J.; Santos, L.L.; de Lima Júnior, D.M.; de Albuquerque Mariz, T.M.; Ladeira, M.M.; de Azevedo, P.S.; Lima, C.B.; dos Santos Silva, M.J.M. Spineless Cactus Associated with Tifton Hay or Sugarcane Bagasse May Replace Corn Silage in Sheep Diets. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2017, 49, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. dos Santos Neto, C.F.; da Silva, R.G.; Maranhão, S.R.; Barreto, C.M.; Lopes, M.N.; Cândido, M.J.D. Morphological Characteristics and Yield of Opuntia Stricta and Nopalea Cochenillifera in Integrated Crop Systems with Caatinga Trees. Agrofor. Syst. 2023, 97, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Catarina, J.; Chagas, C.; Shan, A.; Pastorelli, G.; Serra, V.; Vannuccini, C.; Attard, E. Opuntia Spp. as Alternative Fodder for Sustainable Livestock Production. Animals 2022, 12, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meissner, H.H.; Köster, H.H.; Nieuwoudt, S.H.; Coertze, R.J. Effect of Energy Supplementation on Intake and Digestion of Early and Mid-Season Ryegrass and Panicum/Smuts Finger Hay, and on in Sacco Disappearance of Various Forage Species. S Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 1991, 21, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  27. International AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International; AOAC International: Rockville, MD, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  28. Detmann, E.; de Souza, M.; de Filho, S.C.V.; de Queiroz, A.; Berchielli, T.; de Saliba, E.O.; da Cabral, L.S.; dos Pina, D.S.; Ladeira, M.; Azevedo, J. Métodos Para Análise de Alimentos; Suprema: Visconde do Rio Branco, Brazil, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  29. Van Soest, P.J. Use of Detergents in the Analysis of Fibrous Feeds. 2. A Rapid Method for the Determination of Fiber and Lignin. J. Assoc. Off. Agric. Chem. 1963, 46, 829–835. [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Soest, P.J.; Wine, R.H. Use of Detergents in the Analysis of Fibrous Feeds. IV. Determination of Plant Cell-Wall Constituents. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1967, 50, 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sniffen, C.J.; O’Connor, J.D.; Van Soest, P.J.; Fox, D.G.; Russel, J.B. A Net Carbohydrate and Protein System for Evaluating Cattle Diets: IV. Predicting Amino Acid Adequacy. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 71, 1298–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weiss, W.P.; Conrad, H.R.; St. Pierre, N.R. A Theoretically-Based Model for Predicting Total Digestible Nutrient Values of Forages and Concentrates. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 1992, 39, 95–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Maurício, R.M.; Pereira, L.G.R.; Gonçalves, L.C.; Rodriguez, N.M. Relationship between Volume and Pressure for Installation of the Semi-Automated in Vitro Gas Production Technique for Tropical Forage Evaluation. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 2003, 55, 216–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Theodorou, M.K.; Williams, B.A.; Dhanoa, M.S.; McAllan, A.B.; France, J. A Simple Gas Production Method Using a Pressure Transducer to Determine the Fermentation Kinetics of Ruminant Feeds. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 1994, 48, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ammar, H.; Kholif, A.E.; Soltan, Y.A.; Almadani, M.I.; Soufan, W.; Morsy, A.S.; Ouerghemmi, S.; Chahine, M.; de Haro Marti, M.E.; Hassan, S.; et al. Nutritive Value of Ajuga Iva as a Pastoral Plant for Ruminants: Plant Phytochemicals and In Vitro Gas Production and Digestibility. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pereira, E.S.; Pimentel, P.G.; Duarte, L.S.; Mizubuti, I.Y.; de Araújo, G.G.L.; de Carneiro, M.S.S.; Lousada Regadas Filho, J.G.; Maia, I.S.G. Determinação Das Frações Proteicas e de Carboidratos e Estimativa Do Valor Energético de Forrageiras e Subprodutos Da Agroindústria Produzidos No Nordeste Brasileiro. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 2010, 31, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  37. Schofield, P.; Pitt, R.E.; Pell, A.N. Kinetics of Fiber Digestion from in Vitro Gas Production. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 72, 2980–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hassan, M.U.; Vastolo, A.; Gannuscio, R.; Maniaci, G.; Mancuso, I.; Calabrò, S.; Gallo, A.; Todaro, M.; Cutrignelli, M.I. Effects of Feeding Prickly Pear By-Product Silage as a Partial Replacement of Concentrate on Dairy Ewes: Milk Characteristics, Nutrient Utilisation and in Vitro Ruminal Fermentation. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2025, 324, 116330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garfias Silva, V.; Cordova Aguilar, M.S.; Ascanio, G.; Aguayo, J.P.; Pérez-Salas, K.Y.; Susunaga Notario, A.D.C. Acid Hydrolysis of Pectin and Mucilage from Cactus (Opuntia ficus) for Identification and Quantification of Monosaccharides. Molecules 2022, 27, 5830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Magalhães, A.L.R.; Teodoro, A.L.; de Oliveira, L.P.; Gois, G.C.; Campos, F.S.; de Andrade, A.P.; de Melo, A.A.S.; do Nascimento, D.B.; da Silva, W.A. Chemical Composition, Fractionation of Carbohydrates and Nitrogen Compounds, Ruminal Degradation Kinetics, and in Vitro Gas Production of Cactus Pear Genotypes. Ciência Anim. Bras. 2021, 22, e-69338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ridla, M.; Abdullah, L.; Ernawati, A. Influence of Carbohydrate Fractions on Degradability, Rumen Fermentation, and Methane Emission in Selected Tropical Forages Using an In Vitro Study. Agric. Nat. Res. 2025, 59, 590304. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vago, M.E.; Fernández, P.V.; Ezquiaga, J.P.; Maiale, S.J.; Rodriguez, A.A.; Acosta, J.M.; Gortari, M.; Ruiz, O.A.; Ciancia, M. Overcoming Forage Challenges in Mesophytic Grasslands—The Advantages of Lotus Tenuis. Grasses 2025, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Van Soest, P.J. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd ed.; Comstock Publishing Associates: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  45. Silva, T.S.; de Araújo, G.G.L.; Santos, E.M.; de Oliveira, J.S.; Godoi, P.F.A.; Gois, G.C.; Perazzo, A.F.; Ribeiro, O.L.; Turco, S.H.N.; Campos, F.S. Intake, Digestibility, Nitrogen Balance and Performance in Lamb Fed Spineless Cactus Silage Associated with Forages Adapted to the Semiarid Environment Spineless Cactus Silages in Diets for Lambs. Livest. Sci. 2023, 268, 105168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Noguera, R.R.; Saliba, E.O.; Mauricio, R.M. Comparación de Modelos Matemáticos Para Estimar Los Parámetros de Degradación Obtenidos a Través de La Técnica de Producción de Gas. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev. 2004, 16, 86. [Google Scholar]
  47. Christodoulou, C.; Kliem, K.E.; Auffret, M.D.; Humphries, D.J.; Newbold, J.R.; Davison, N.; Crompton, L.; Dhanoa, M.S.; Smith, L.G.; Stergiadis, S. In Vitro Rumen Degradation, Fermentation, and Methane Production of Four Agro-Industrial Protein-Rich Co-Products, Compared with Soyabean Meal. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2025, 319, 116151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, J.; Zheng, N.; Shen, W.; Zhao, S.; Wang, J. Synchrony Degree of Dietary Energy and Nitrogen Release Influences Microbial Community, Fermentation, and Protein Synthesis in a Rumen Simulation System. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Tigre, J.S. Cinética e Produtos de Fermentação Ruminal de Rações Contendo Co-Produtos Agroindustriais, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The Brazilian semi-arid region. Source: the authors.
Figure 1. The Brazilian semi-arid region. Source: the authors.
Ruminants 05 00037 g001
Figure 2. Cumulative gas production from the spineless forage cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera, cv Baiana) diets with different sugarcane bagasse levels added.
Figure 2. Cumulative gas production from the spineless forage cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera, cv Baiana) diets with different sugarcane bagasse levels added.
Ruminants 05 00037 g002
Figure 3. Cumulative gas production (CGP) from the spineless forage cactus (Opuntia stricta, cv Mexicana) diets with different sugarcane bagasse levels added.
Figure 3. Cumulative gas production (CGP) from the spineless forage cactus (Opuntia stricta, cv Mexicana) diets with different sugarcane bagasse levels added.
Ruminants 05 00037 g003
Figure 4. Cumulative gas production (CGP) from the spineless forage cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera, cv Miúda) diets with different sugarcane bagasse levels added.
Figure 4. Cumulative gas production (CGP) from the spineless forage cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera, cv Miúda) diets with different sugarcane bagasse levels added.
Ruminants 05 00037 g004
Table 1. Chemical–bromatological composition of silage from the genotypes of spineless cactus genotypes studies.
Table 1. Chemical–bromatological composition of silage from the genotypes of spineless cactus genotypes studies.
Variable (g/kg) 1Sugarcane BagasseMiúda 2Baiana 2Mexicana 2
DM905.0131.0123.1111.2
OM911.2935.0921.5901.2
NDF866.7254.5234.3278.0
ADF583.9222.5191.2240.8
EE8.016.519.022.0
TCs958.6823.9816.7806.1
NFCs91.9569.4582.4528.1
Ash150.0113.1121.3131.9
CP18.446.543.040.0
Ca8.423.025.028.7
P10.91.82.12.9
CEL427.1200.5210.0215.3
HEM282.832.035.137.2
LIG156.822.024.325.5
1 g/kg of DM = dry matter; OM = organic matter; NDF = neutral detergent fiber; ADF = acid detergent fiber; EE = ether extract; TCs = total carbohydrates; NFCs = non-fiber carbohydrates; CP = crude protein; Ca = calcium; P = phosphorus; CEL = cellulose; HEM = hemicellulose; LIG = lignin. 2 Spineless forage cactus genotype.
Table 2. Chemical–bromatological composition * of treatments with forage cactus silage combined with five levels of sugarcane bagasse (0, 150, 300, 450, and 600 g/kg DM).
Table 2. Chemical–bromatological composition * of treatments with forage cactus silage combined with five levels of sugarcane bagasse (0, 150, 300, 450, and 600 g/kg DM).
SBL 1 g/kg of DM150300450600150300450600150300450600
Cactus 2MiúdaBaianaMexicana
Variable 3
DM247.1363.2479.3595.4240.3357.6474.9592.2230.2349.3468.4587.4
OM931.4927.8924.2920.7919.9918.4916.8915.3902.7904.2905.7907.2
NDF346.3438.1529.9621.8329.1424.0518.8613.7366.30454.6542.9631.2
ADF276.7330.9385.1439.3250.1309.0367.9426.8292.2343.7395.1446.6
EE15.213.912.611.417.315.714.012.419.917.815.713.6
TCs844.1864.3884.5904.7837.9859.2880.5901.8828.9851.8874.7897.6
NFCs497.7426.1354.5282.9508.8435.2361.6288.1462.6397.2331.8266.3
Ash118.6124.1129.7135.2125.6129.9134.2138.5134.6137.3140.0142.7
CP42.238.033.829.639.335.631.928.236.733.530.227.0
Ca20.818.616.414.222.520.017.515.025.622.619.516.5
P3.14.55.87.263.44.76.07.34.15.36.57.7
CEL234.4268.4302.4336.4242.5275.1307.6340.2247.0278.8310.6342.3
HEM69.6107.2144.8182.472.2109.4146.5183.774.0110.8147.7184.5
LIG42.262.482.6102.844.164.083.9103.845.164.884.5104.2
* Calculated based on the proportion of each individual ingredient used. 1 Sugarcane bagasse level; 2 Spineless forage cactus genotype; 3 g/kg of DM = dry matter; OM = organic matter; NDF = neutral detergent fiber; ADF = acid detergent fiber; EE = ether extract; TCs = total carbohydrates; NFCs = non-fiber carbohydrates; CP = crude protein; Ca = calcium; P = phosphorus; CEL = cellulose; HEM = hemicellulose; LIG = lignin.
Table 3. Cumulative gas production (mL/g of DM) from silage of three forage cactus genotypes studied associated with different sugarcane bagasse levels.
Table 3. Cumulative gas production (mL/g of DM) from silage of three forage cactus genotypes studied associated with different sugarcane bagasse levels.
Cactus GenotypeSugarcane Bagasse Inclusion Level (g/kg DM)p-Value
0150300450600Bagasse Level
Miúda93.0 A,b30.2 B,b10.0 C,b7.9 D,b4.6 E,b<0.001
Mexicana72.5 A,c7.5 B,c5.9 C,c3.6 C,c4.7 C,b<0.001
Baiana116.1 A,a34.7 B,a23.4 C,a11.7 D,a11.0 D,a<0.001
p-Value genotype<0.001<0.001<0.0010.0020.015
Notes: Different letters in superscript are indicative of significant differences (p < 0.05) between genotypes (a, b, c, in columns) and levels of bagasse inclusion (A, B, C, D, E, in rows), after the Dunnett post hoc test.
Table 4. In vitro degradability of dry matter (IVDDM) and organic matter (IVDOM) from silage of the three forage cactus genotypes (Miúda, Mexicana, and Baiana) studied, associated with different sugarcane bagasse levels.
Table 4. In vitro degradability of dry matter (IVDDM) and organic matter (IVDOM) from silage of the three forage cactus genotypes (Miúda, Mexicana, and Baiana) studied, associated with different sugarcane bagasse levels.
Miúda Forage
VariableSugarcane Bagasse Inclusion Level (g/kg DM)Contrast (p-Value)
0150300450600LinearQuadraticCubic
IVDDM (g/kgDM)796.8 b,A380.4 a,B226.8 b,C191.4 b,D143.0 a,E<0.0010.1070.801
IVDOM (g/kgDM)862.9 γ,Γ512.1 β,Δ344.4 γ,Θ294.8 γ,Λ199.5 γ,Ω<0.0010.1710.649
Mexicana Forage
VariableSugarcane Bagasse Inclusion Level (g/kg DM)Contrast (p-Value)
0150300450600LinearQuadraticCubic
IVDDM (g/kgDM)767.3 b,A239.8 c,B135.0 c,D122.5 c,D151.2 a,C<0.0010.0790.803
IVDOM (g/kgDM)922.3 β,Γ466.3 γ,Δ433.1 β,Θ441.6 β,Θ360.8 α,Λ0.0240.7460.420
Baiana Forage
VariableSugarcane Bagasse Inclusion Level (g/kg DM)Contrast (p-Value)
0150300450600LinearQuadraticCubic
IVDDM (g/kgDM)823.9 a,A310.7 b,B278.7 a,C233.8 a,D116.6 b,E0.0010.8360.398
IVDOM (g/kgDM)956.3 α,Γ647.4 α,Δ507.6 α,Θ475.3 α,Λ320.4 β,Ω0.0150.8480.562
Notes: Different letters in superscript are indicative of significant differences (p < 0.05) between genotypes for IVDDM (a, b, c, in columns) and IVDOM (α, β, γ in columns), and levels of bagasse inclusion for IVDDM (A, B, C, D, E, in rows) and IVDOM (Γ, Δ, Θ, Λ, Ω, in rows), after the Dunnett post hoc test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Torquato, I.A.; Costa, C.T.F.; Jesus, M.S.; Mata, F.; Santos, J.; Santana, H.E.P.; Silva, D.P.; Ruzene, D.S. Spineless Cactus (Opuntia stricta and Nopalea cochenillifera) with Added Sugar Cane (Saccharum officinarum) Bagasse Silage as Bovine Feed in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region. Ruminants 2025, 5, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030037

AMA Style

Torquato IA, Costa CTF, Jesus MS, Mata F, Santos J, Santana HEP, Silva DP, Ruzene DS. Spineless Cactus (Opuntia stricta and Nopalea cochenillifera) with Added Sugar Cane (Saccharum officinarum) Bagasse Silage as Bovine Feed in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region. Ruminants. 2025; 5(3):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Torquato, Iran Alves, Cleber Thiago Ferreira Costa, Meirielly Santos Jesus, Fernando Mata, Joana Santos, Hortência E. Pereira Santana, Daniel Pereira Silva, and Denise Santos Ruzene. 2025. "Spineless Cactus (Opuntia stricta and Nopalea cochenillifera) with Added Sugar Cane (Saccharum officinarum) Bagasse Silage as Bovine Feed in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region" Ruminants 5, no. 3: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030037

APA Style

Torquato, I. A., Costa, C. T. F., Jesus, M. S., Mata, F., Santos, J., Santana, H. E. P., Silva, D. P., & Ruzene, D. S. (2025). Spineless Cactus (Opuntia stricta and Nopalea cochenillifera) with Added Sugar Cane (Saccharum officinarum) Bagasse Silage as Bovine Feed in the Brazilian Semi-Arid Region. Ruminants, 5(3), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030037

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop