Factors Influencing the Setting of Automatic Teat Cup Removal at the End of Machine Milking in Dairy Cows—An Overview
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Importance of Automatic Teat Cup Removal
3. Factors Influencing Automatic Teat Cup Removal
3.1. Automatic Teat Cup Removal and Degree of Udder Emptying
3.2. Automatic Teat Cup Removal and Udder Health
3.3. Automatic Teat Cup Removal and Daily Milking Frequency
3.4. Automatic Teat Cup Removal and Lactation Number
3.5. Automatic Teat Cup Removal and Stage of Lactation
3.6. Uncontrolled Change in the Setting for Automatic Teat Cup Removal
4. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
ATCR | Automatic teat cup removal |
AMS | Automatic milking system |
References
- Armstrong, D.V.; Bickert, W.G.; Gerrish, J.B.; Spike, P.W. Automatic milking machine removal. J. Dairy Sci. 1970, 53, 658. [Google Scholar]
- Radcliffe, J.C.; Horne, M.L.; Chillingworth, C.A. A comparison of manual and automatic teat cup removal techniques for milking dairy cows. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 1972, 27, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
- De la Nichols, M. Electronic “End of milking” detector and teat cup remover. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 1972, 15, 639–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuthbert, S. Milking Practices and Technology Use Survey. DairyNZ: Hamilton, New Zealand, 2008; pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- Ferneborg, S.; Thulin, M.; Agenas, S.; Svennersten-Sjaunja, K.; Krawczel, P.; Temman, E. Increased take-off level in automatic milking systems-effects on milk flow, milk yield and milking efficiency at the quarter level. J. Dairy Res. 2019, 86, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burke, J.K.; Jago, J.G. The effect of two milk flow-rate thresholds for automatic cup removal on milking duration, production and somatic cell count of peak-lactation dairy cows. In Proceedings of the 4th Australasian Dairy Science Symposium 2010, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 23–26 February 2010; pp. 376–379. [Google Scholar]
- Stewart, S.; Godden, S.; Rapnicki, P.; Reid, D.; Johnson, A.; Eicker, S. Effects of automatic cluster remover settings on average milking duration, milk flow, and milk yield. J. Dairy Sci. 2002, 85, 818–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Penry, J.F.; Reinemann, D.J. Milking Machines: Principles and Design. Encyclopaedia of Dairy Sciences, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 805–815. [Google Scholar]
- Upton, J.; Browne, M.; Silva Bolona, P. Effect of milk flow rate switch-point settings on cow comfort and milking duration. J. Dairy Sci. 2023, 106, 2438–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, U.; Hefter, L.M.; Wedeking, S.D.; Büscher, W.; Barth, K. Incomplete milking before drying off does not impair the udder health of cows infected with minor pathogens. J. Dairy Res. 2024, 90, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berglund, I.; Pettersson, G.; Svennersten-Sjaunja, K. Automatic milking: Effects on somatic cell count and teat end-quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 78, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmussen, M.D. Overmilking and teat condition. In Proceedings of the NMC Annual Meeting, Charlotte, NC, USA, 1–4 February 2004; pp. 169–175. [Google Scholar]
- Krawczel, P.; Ferneborg, S.; Wiking, L.; Dalsgaard, T.K.; Gregersen, S.; Black, R.; Larsen, T.; Agenäs, S.; Svennersten-Sjaunja, K.; Ternman, E. Milking time and risk of over-milking can be decreased with early teat cup removal based on udder quarter milk flow without loss in milk yield. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 6640–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poulet, J.L.; Dzidic, A.; Ginsberg, R.; Rasmussen, M.; Manninen, E.; Sigurdsson, S.; Bruckmaier, R.; Tancin, V.; Sanchez, M. Teat-cup and cluster removal strategies for cattle and small ruminants. Review and recommendation. Bull. Int. Dairy Fed. 2018, 491, 1–56. [Google Scholar]
- Kaskous, S. The effect of using quarter individual milking system “MultiLactor” on improvement of milk performance and milk quality of different dairy cows breeds in different farms. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2018, 30, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaskous, S. Optimization of milk performance and quality in dairy farms by using a quarter individual milking system “MultiLactor”. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 2020, 5, 943–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tancin, V.; Ipema, B.; Hogewerf, P.; Macuhova, J. Sources of variation in milk flow characteristics at udder and quarter levels. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 978–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gasparik, M.; Duchacek, J.; Stadnik, L.; Novakova, V. Impact of milking settings optimization on milk quality, milking time, and milk yield in Holstein cows. IOP Con. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 420, 012073. [Google Scholar]
- Kaskous, S.; Pfaffl, M.W. Milking machine settings and liner design are important to improve milking efficiency and lactating animal welfare-technical note. AgriEngineering 2023, 5, 1314–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Browne, M.; Bolona, P.S.; Upton, J. Measurement of cow comfort during milking on different cluster removal settings through the use of leg-mounted accelerometers. J. Dairy Res. Commun. 2024, 5, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magliaro, A.L.; Kensinger, R.S. Automatic cluster remover setting affects milk yield and machine-on time in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, W.N.; Han, S.G. Bovine mastitis: Risk factors, therapeutic strategies, and alternative treatments—A review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 33, 1699–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Xu, C.; Liang, B.; Kastelic, J.P.; Han, B.; Tong, X.; Gao, J. Alternatives to antibiotics for treatment of mastitis in dairy cows. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 10, 1160350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, J.P.; Jago, J.G.; Lopez-Villalobos, N. Large rotary dairies achieve high cow throughput but are not more labour efficient than medium sized rotaries. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2013, 53, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, J.P.; Jago, J.G.; Lopez-Villalobos, N. Milking efficiency can be improved by increasing automatic cluster remover thresholds to grazing dairy cows without applying pre milking stimulation. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 3766–3773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva Bolona, P.; Reinemann, D.J.; Upton, J. Effect of teat cup removal settings on milking efficiency and milk quality in a pasture-based automatic milking system. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 8423–8430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wieland, M.; Nydam, D.V.; Heuwieser, W.; Morrill, K.M.; Ferlito, L.; Watters, R.D.; Virkler, P.D. A randomized trial to study the effect of automatic cluster remover settings on milking performance, teat condition, and udder health. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 3668–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reid, I.C.; Stewart, C.A. Seizures, memory, and synaptic plasticity. Seizure 1997, 6, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva Bolona, P.; Upton, J.; Reinemann, D.J. Effects of simulated quarter and udder teat cup removal settings on strip milk and milking duration in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 4446–4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neijenhuis, F.; Barkema, H.W.; Hogeveen, H.; Noordhuizen, J.P.T.M. Relationship between teat-end callosity and occurrence of clinical mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84, 2664–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jago, J.G.; Burke, J.L.; Williamson, J.H. Effect of automatic cluster remover settings on production, udder health, and milking duration. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 2541–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lincke, k. Gestresste Kühe geben weniger Milch. Top Agrar. 2013, 7, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, F.G.; Antas, C.; Conceicao, C.; Geraldo, A.; Pereira, A. Inter-Quarter variation in the prevalence and severity of teat-end hyperkeratosis in dairy cows. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Animals Session Sustainable Animal Welfare, Ethics, And Human-Animal Interactions, MDPI, Online, 12–14 March 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Sagi, R. Milk flow rate and end of milking detectors. Proc. Natl Mastit. Counc. 1978, 17, 328–334. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, M.D. Influence of switch level of automatic cluster removers on milking performance and udder health. J. Dairy Res. 1993, 60, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penry, J.F.; Endres, E.L.; de Bruijn, B.; Kleinhans, A.; Crump, P.M.; Reinemann, D.J.; Hernandez, L.L. Effect of incomplete milking on milk production rate and composition with 2 daily milkings. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 1535–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walsh, J.P. Bovine Residual Milk in the Immediate Postpartum Period. Ir. J. Agric. Res. 1976, 15, 85–89. [Google Scholar]
- Peaker, M.; Blatchford, D.R. Distribution of milk in the goat mammary-gland and its relation to the rate and control of milk secretion. J. Dairy Res. 1988, 55, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albaaj, A.; Marnet, P.G.; Hurtaud, C.; Guinard-Flament, J. Adaptation of dairy cows to increasing degrees of incomplete milk removal during a single milking interval. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 8492–8504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, S.R.; Farr, V.C.; Stelwagen, K. Regulation of yield loss and milk composition during once-daily milking: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1999, 59, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wall, E.H.; McFadden, T.B. Use it or lose it: Enhancing milk production efficiency by frequent milking of dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norgaard, J.; Sorensen, A.; Sorensen, M.T.; Andersen, J.B.; Sejrsen, K. Mammary cell turnover and enzyme activity in dairy cows: Effects of milking frequency and diet energy density. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, S.R.; Farr, V.C.; Copeland, J.A.; Crruthers, V.R.; Knight, C.H.; Stelwagen, K. Partitioning of milk accumulation between cisternal and alveolar compartments of the bovine udder: Relationship to production loss during once daily milking. J. Dairy Res. 1998, 65, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuehnl, J.M.; Connelly, M.K.; Dzidic, A.; Lauber, M.; Fricke, H.P.; Klister, M.; Olstad, E.; Balbach, M.; Timlin, E.; Pszczolkowski, V.; et al. The effects of incomplete milking and increased milking frequency on milk production rate and milk composition. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 2424–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilde, C.J.; Peaker, M. Autocrine control in milk secretion. J. Agric. Sci. 1990, 114, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruckmaier, R.M.; Wellnitz, O. Induction of milk ejection and milk removal in different production systems. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86 (Suppl. S13), 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, J.P.; Jago, J.G.; Lopez-Villalobos, N. Analysis of milking characteristics in New Zealand dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worstorff, H.; Tröger, F.; Model, I.; Marsch, M. Ziele, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Beratung. In Melkberatung Mit Milchflusskurven, 1st ed.; Bayerische Landesanstalt für Tierzucht Grub: Poing, Germany, 2000; Volume 5, pp. 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- Silva Bolona, P.; Reinemann, D.J.; Upton, J. Short communication: Increasing the teatcup removal settings of the last milking quarter did not reduce box time in a pasture-based automatic milking system. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ipema, A.H.; Hogewerf, P.H. Detachment criteria and milking duration. In Proceedings of the First North American Conference on Robotic Milking, Toronto, ON, Canada, 20–22 March 2022; Wageningen Pres.: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 33–44. [Google Scholar]
- Penry, J.F.; Crump, P.M.; Hernandez, L.L.; Reinemann, D.J. Association of quarter milking measurement and cow-level factors in an automatic milking system. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 7551–7562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eicker, S.; Stewart, S.; Reid, D.; Rapnicki, P. New tools for measuring the effect of stimulation and take-off on milk flows. In Proceedings of the Minnesota Dairy Health Conference, CVM, St. Paul, MO, USA, 29–31 May 2000; University of Minnesota: St. Paul, MO, USA, 2000; pp. 127–133. [Google Scholar]
- Bruckmaier, R.M. Normal and disturbed milk ejection in dairy cows. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2005, 29, 268–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, U.; Albers, E. Das Melkzeug früher abnehmen? Elite Mag. 2017, 1, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
- Mein, G.A.; Thompson, P.D. Milking the 30,000-pound herd. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 3294–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holst, G.; Adrion, F.; Umstätter, C.; Bruckmaier, R. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 4775–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lüdi, I.; Bruckmaier, R.M. The teat cup detachment level affects milking performance in an automatic milking system with teat cleaning and milking in the same teat cup. J. Dairy Res. 2022, 89, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, T.; Cuthbertson, E.M.; Greenall, R.K.; Hannah, M.C.; Shoesmith, D. Incomplete milking has no detectable effect on somatic cell count but increased cell count appears to increase strip yield. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2008, 48, 1161–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hömberg, D. So wichtig ist die Vorstimulation wirklich. Milchpur Mag. Milchprufring Bayern E.V. 2016, 4, 16–19. [Google Scholar]
- Dassler, L. Wann muss das Melkzeug vom Euter? Top Agrar 2009, 2, 28–30. [Google Scholar]
- Clarke, T.; Cuthbertson, E.M.; Greenall, R.K.; Hannah, M.C.; Jongman, E.; Shoesmith, D. Milking regimes to shorten milking duration. J. Dairy Res. 2004, 71, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stelwagen, K.; Lacy-Hulbert, S.J. Effect of milking frequency on milk somatic cell count characteristics and mammary secretory cell damage in cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1996, 57, 902–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalley, D.E.; Davis, S.R. Effect of an extended milking interval on recovery of milk yield and somatic cell count in dairy cows. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2006, 66, 241–244. [Google Scholar]
- Stelwagen, K. Effect of milking frequency on mammary functioning and shape of the lactation curve. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 84 (Suppl. E), E204–E211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weaver, S.R.; Hernandez, L.L. Autocrine-paracrine regulation of the mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 842–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruckmaier, R.M.; Hilger, M. Milk ejection in dairy cows at different degrees of udder filling. J. Dairy Res. 2001, 68, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caja, G.; Ayadi, M.; Knight, C.H. Changes in cisternal compartment based on stage of lactation and time since milk ejection in the udder of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2004, 87, 2409–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaskous, S. Alte Kühe dank neuer Melktechnik. Z. Hess. Zuk. Fakten Trends Informationen Aus Rinderszene 2016, 03, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, M.D. Overmilking and teat condition. In 5. Tänikoner Melktechniktagung, Nachhaltige Milchgewinnung. Agroscope Science NR; Savary, P., Schick, M., Eds.; Institut Für Nachhaltigkeitswissenschaften INH, Tänikon 1: Ettenhausen, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 5–11. [Google Scholar]
Parameters * | LSM ± SE ** | Minimal Value | Maximal Value |
---|---|---|---|
Milk yield kg/day | 35.84 ± 0.28 | 7.10 | 68.60 |
Fat % | 4.36 ± 0.02 | 2.27 | 7.74 |
Protein % | 3.28 ± 0.01 | 2.11 | 5.02 |
Lactose % | 4.75 ± 0.01 | 3.59 | 5.25 |
Urea mg/dL | 20.65 ± 0.20 | 5.00 | 35.00 |
SCC × 103 cells/mL | 99.63 ± 6.48 | 6000 | 200,000 |
Lactation number | 3.31 ± 0.04 | 1.00 | 8.00 |
Parameters | ATCR Setting * | SED ** | Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATCR 0.2 kg·min−1 | ATCR 0.4 kg·min−1 | |||
Milking duration (min) | 6.82 | 6.04 | 0.044 | <0.001 |
Post-milking strip yield (Kg) | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.071 | <0.001 |
Daily milk fat yield (kg) | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.007 | NS |
Daily milk protein yield (kg) | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.003 | <0.05 |
SCC (log10) | 1.79 | 1.81 | 0.021 | NS |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kaskous, S. Factors Influencing the Setting of Automatic Teat Cup Removal at the End of Machine Milking in Dairy Cows—An Overview. Ruminants 2025, 5, 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030030
Kaskous S. Factors Influencing the Setting of Automatic Teat Cup Removal at the End of Machine Milking in Dairy Cows—An Overview. Ruminants. 2025; 5(3):30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030030
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaskous, Shehadeh. 2025. "Factors Influencing the Setting of Automatic Teat Cup Removal at the End of Machine Milking in Dairy Cows—An Overview" Ruminants 5, no. 3: 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030030
APA StyleKaskous, S. (2025). Factors Influencing the Setting of Automatic Teat Cup Removal at the End of Machine Milking in Dairy Cows—An Overview. Ruminants, 5(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5030030