Previous Article in Journal
Recent Research on Livestock Microbiota, Its Role in Digestion and Its Impact on Methane Emissions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ethnozootechnical Perspectives on the Decline of Traditional Knowledge About Local Goat and Sheep Breeds in the Semi-Arid Region of Paraíba, Brazil

by
Raissa C. Silva
1,
Marilene N. Melo
2,
Carlos F. T. de Oliveira
3,
José V. Cardoso
2,
Luis A. C. Cevallos
4,
Laura L. da Rocha
1,
Janaina K. G. Arandas
5,* and
Maria N. Ribeiro
1
1
Department of Animal Sciences, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, PE, Brazil
2
Program for the Application of Appropriate Technology to Communities-PATAC, Campina Grande 58428-800, PB, Brazil
3
AS-PTA Family Farming and Agroecology, Esperança 58135-000, PB, Brazil
4
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Agronomía, Universidad UTE, Quito 170147, Ecuador
5
Department of Education, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, PE, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ruminants 2025, 5(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5020026
Submission received: 19 April 2025 / Revised: 4 June 2025 / Accepted: 5 June 2025 / Published: 13 June 2025

Simple Summary

Native goat and sheep breeds are slowly disappearing in Brazil’s semi-arid region, along with the traditional knowledge associated with them. This study explored four rural areas in Paraíba to understand how local breeders care for these animals, how much breed diversity remains, and what traits they value most. The results showed a worrying decline in both the variety of breeds and in the traditional knowledge passed down through generations. Many breeders have a deep emotional bond with their animals and value traits like resilience and fertility. However, current husbandry practices—such as the use of foreign breeds—are replacing local breeds and traditional breeding practices. This loss goes beyond genetics; it also threatens the cultural identity and history of these communities. Protecting these animals means conserving both the breeds and the knowledge tied to them. Including local breeders in management decisions is key to keeping both the animals and their cultural heritage alive.

Abstract

The conservation of local breeds plays a strategic role in maintaining genetic variability, ensuring adaptive responses to environmental challenges, and preserving the cultural and socioeconomic structures of traditional communities. In this context, this study explores the potential disappearance of traditional knowledge about local breeds from an ethnozootechnical perspective. The objectives were (I) to establish the breeding history of goat and sheep breeds/ecotypes in the semi-arid region of Paraíba; (II) to estimate the diversity index; and (III) to evaluate the selection criteria used by local communities in four territories: Coletivo, Borborema, Folia, and Casaco. The study aims to support genetic conservation and improvement programs. Data collection was participatory, involving breeders from all territories. To recover the breeds’ history, questionnaires were applied to the oldest breeders, called the “guardians.” Two workshops were held to assess the diversity of breeds in the past landscape (PP) and current landscape (PA), using the Recall technique. Responses were recorded in spreadsheets for analysis. Descriptive statistics and multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) were used to assess animal distribution. The Shannon index indicated a drop in goat breed diversity, from 1.3 (PP) to 0.87 (PA). For sheep breeds, it decreased slightly from 0.7 to 0.66. Breeders reported valuing traits such as adaptability, disease resistance, fertility, and conformation. Their strong emotional connection with the animals highlights the breeds’ cultural relevance. A strong connection was found between the loss of genetic material in the studied territories and the extinction of local communities’ knowledge about local breeds.

1. Introduction

In Brazil, the goat and sheep production chain represents an important source of income for small rural producers, mainly through the utilization of meat, milk, and hides [1]. The national herd totals 11.9 million goats and 20.5 million sheep, with the Northeast region concentrating 95.2% and 69.9% of these populations, respectively [2]. In this context, the state of Paraíba stands out for having the fifth largest goat herd in the country, with an estimated population of 764,758 animals [2]. Goat farming is traditional and well-established in several regions of Paraíba and is considered one of the state’s main economic vocations [2,3]. Sheep farming also plays a significant role, generating jobs and income, and contributing to the sustainable development of rural areas, while also supporting ecosystem balance and biodiversity conservation [4].
The diversity of goat and sheep breeds is fundamental to the sustainability of agricultural production, especially in regions with adverse ecological conditions. The history of animal husbandry practices among local communities reflects a rich cultural heritage and an intrinsic relationship between tradition and the environment. In this context, ethnozootechnics emerges as an approach that integrates traditional and academic knowledge, valuing the wisdom accumulated over generations and its application in management and selection practices [5].
This appreciation of local knowledge is a manifestation of what is known as ethnoscience, which emerged in the United States in the 20th century. This new approach transcends the view of cultures as mere sets of artifacts and behaviors and begins to consider them as knowledge systems [6]. Ethnozootechnics, in turn, was made official with the creation of the Société d’Ethnozootechnie in France [7]. This discipline represents the intersection between local and academic knowledge, especially in the context of zootechnical practices. It values the connection between traditional knowledge accumulated over generations and academic knowledge related to animal breeding and management, which is essential for sustainable animal production.
However, the loss of local knowledge represents a significant threat to the conservation of agrobiodiversity, especially in traditional communities [8]. This loss of knowledge, often the result of the modernization and industrialization of agriculture, compromises the genetic diversity of breeds and the ability of communities to adapt to environmental changes. In addition, industrial land use systems also contribute to the erosion of biodiversity and local cultural elements, resulting in the global trend of biodiversity loss [9]. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of conserving locally adapted domestic animal breeds as a strategy for maintaining genetic diversity and production system resilience. This effort also involves protecting the traditional knowledge and management practices coevolved with these genetic resources [10,11,12].
Traditional knowledge is also important in breeding programs, especially in the selection of breeding animals based on local criteria. This is particularly relevant in small-scale, family-based breeding systems, whose interests differ from large production systems [9]. There is a vast body of literature worldwide recognizing the value of integrating traditional knowledge [13,14]. However, despite its importance, studies adopting this perspective in Brazil are still limited and relatively recent, highlighting the need for further research into the application and valorization of local knowledge in management practices [6,15].
In this context, the aim of this work was to evaluate the history, diversity index and selection criteria of goats and sheep in four territories in the semi-arid region of Paraiba, Brazil, using the ethno-zoological approach.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The research was conducted in four territories that are part of the Semi-Arid Articulation of Paraíba (ASA-PB). Semi-Arid Articulation of Paraíba forms a network of organizations that operate throughout the semi-arid region, aiming to defend the rights of the inhabitants and communities in this area and promoting coexistence with the Semi-Arid. The organizations that make up Semi-Arid Articulation of Paraíba are structured in assemblies and networks across the ten states (Minas Gerais, Bahia, Sergipe, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Paraíba, Rio Grande do Norte, Ceará, Piauí, and Maranhão) that cover the Brazilian biomes of Caatinga and Cerrado. One of the initiatives undertaken by this ASA-PB network is the improvement of family-based animal husbandry systems with locally adapted breeds in Paraíba. Asa Paraíba, in turn, is an integral part of the Brazilian Semi-Arid Articulation, which operates across 10 states. The study involved 80 families from four farmer groups (CASACO, FOLIA, BORBOREMA and COLETIVO) in eight municipalities in Paraíba (Soledade, São Vicente, Esperança, Queimadas, Campina Grande, Boqueirão, Aroeiras and Caraúbas).
The territory of CASACO (Association of Leaders, Organizations, Farmers and Family Farmers of Cariri Paraibano) was established in 2008 by Father Francisco Ponciano da Silva, then serving as priest of the Parish of Nossa Senhora do Desterro-Boqueirão-PB. Its efforts are focused on the transition of family farmers to agroecology, impacting nine municipalities in the Cariri Paraibano Territory: Alcantil, Barra de São Miguel, Cabaceiras, Caraúbas, Caturité, Congo, Boqueirão, Riacho de Santo Antônio and São Domingos do Cariri.
The territory known as “Polo Borborema” is a center of trade union and family farming organizations of Borborema, established in July 1996. Embracing agro-ecological principles, it is currently dedicated to innovative initiatives to support family farming in the municipalities of Alagoa Nova, Algodão de Jandaíra, Arara, Areial, Casserengue, Esperança, Lagoa Seca, Matinhas, Montadas, Queimadas, Remígio, São Sebastião de Lagoa de Roça and Solânea. The Folia territory, also known as the Agreste Leadership Forum, involves women farmers and young people from the municipalities of Aroeiras, Fagundes, Gado Bravo, Ingá, Itatuba, Itabaiana, Natuba, Mogeiro and Umbuzeiro.
Finally, the Collective serves as a significant platform for critical analysis, formulation, proposal and negotiation of public policies aimed at family farming in Cariri, Curimataú and Seridó. It has also been instrumental in the management and planning of community and regional development initiatives, with a focus on strengthening agroecological practices in family farming.
This region, in particular, covers an area of 22,671 km2 and is located at geographical coordinates 8°13′37″ S and 37°12′46″ W, with an elevation of 525 m and a distance of 126.5 km from the capital of Paraíba (Figure 1). These areas correspond to agroecological transition zones, characterized by the overlapping influence of different climatic and soil conditions.

2.2. Data Collection

The study used an ethnozootechnical approach, integrating the knowledge and experience of breeders at all stages of the project. To this end, a semi-structured questionnaire was used, supported by the focus group discussion, which involved technicians, researchers and breeders. None of the participants interviewed had formal technical training in animal science or related fields; however, all possessed a high degree of traditional expertise in the management and selection of domestic animal breeds, a form of knowledge that is culturally validated and fundamental within the scope of ethnozootechnical research.

2.3. Historical Survey

The history of the formation of the herds was based on information from six breeders, representatives of the aforementioned territories. These individuals, aged over 50, have dedicated more than two decades of their lives to raising animals of locally adapted breeds/ecotypes and, given their experience, have been recognized as guardians of biodiversity and local traditions. In addition, they have cultural information and a great deal of experience in handling and managing their livestock.

2.4. Current and Past Diversity in the Territories

In order to understand and quantify the current and past diversity of locally adapted breeds/ecotypes and species in the territories, two workshops were held with breeders from the four territories involved.
Workshop 1—participants were divided into separate groups and interviewed separately to ensure that the answers of one group did not influence those of the others. Each group discussed the conservation situation of the diversity of locally adapted goat and sheep breeds/ecotypes, answering open-ended questions about the presence or absence of these animals in the landscape of each territory. The recall technique was used to explore the collective memory of the communities, complementing the information obtained [17]. The recall technique has been employed in ethnozoological and conservation research as a means of directly accessing participants’ memories regarding past events related to the use or observation of animals. Its methodological rationale is grounded in the assumption that individuals are capable of reporting, with reasonable accuracy, information about behaviors, practices, and past occurrences, particularly when such events hold cultural, emotional, or subsistence significance [18,19,20,21]. The answers were documented in a structured spreadsheet (diagrams 1 and 2) for later analysis.
Workshop 2—in the second workshop, photographic material was used to present participants with images of goats and sheep from the region, including both ecotypes and locally adapted breeds, which differ in terms of formal recognition. A discussion group was formed to discuss the most important characteristics considered by farmers when choosing goats and sheep for breeding. The recall technique [17] was then applied again to improve and complement the data collected. In order to assess the participants’ level of knowledge about locally adapted breeds and ecotypes, a questionnaire was carried out with three levels of response: (1) know; (2) heard of; and (3) do not know. The answers were recorded in a spreadsheet.

2.5. Definition of Selection Criteria

Workshop 3—this workshop used the ranking matrix methodology [22]. One male and one female sire were presented to the breeders, who evaluated and scored the characteristics of interest in order of importance. The answers were recorded on appropriate spreadsheets for later analysis.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The interviews were recorded, later transcribed and then subjected to content analysis in order to highlight the most important and relevant aspects of the reports. The interview data was examined using frequency and multiple correspondence analyses to verify the association between current and past knowledge of animal diversity in the four territories studied.
The citation frequencies of breeds and ecotypes/species in the present and in the past were submitted to correspondence analysis (ACM) [23] with the support of the SAS Version 8 [24] program, using the following mathematical model in summary:
S = U D V T ,
where
S: The original data matrix containing the citation frequencies of the breeds in the present and past.
U: The unit matrix containing the eigenvectors of the SST matrix. The columns of U are called left singular vectors.
D: This is a diagonal matrix containing the singular values of S. The singular values are the square root of the eigenvalues of the ST S (or SST) matrix.
VT: This is the transpose of the unit matrix V, which contains the eigenvectors of the STS matrix. The columns of V are called the right-hand singular vectors.
The factor coordinates are obtained using the following formula:
F i = u i α λ α p i + ,   G j = u j α λ α p + j ,
where
F i   e   G j : These are the factorial coordinates of the rows and columns, respectively.
u i α : The element of the u matrix at position iα represents the value of the i-th eigenvector in the direction of the α-th singular value.
λ α : It is the α-th squared singular value, which is an eigenvalue of the STS or SS matrices.
p i + : It is the sum of the elements of row i in the contingency matrix S. It represents the total frequency of the row.
p + j : It is the sum of the elements of column j in the contingency matrix S. It represents the total frequency of column j.
This analysis was used to assess the existence of a significant association between the observed frequencies and the expected frequencies in the data distribution.
The ACM helps to understand the associations between categories in contingency tables. Its use is proposed when you have many categorical variables and want to identify patterns underlying the real data. ACM consists of transforming the original data into a space of reduced dimensions, where the relationships between categories are more easily visualized [23]. The ACM estimates the inertia, which measures the total variation in the data and seeks to maximize the variation explained by each dimension. Finally, a graph is generated with the first two dimensions (inertia), and the behavior of the data is analyzed based on these dimensions, which are the most explanatory.

2.7. Diversity Index

The Shannon diversity index (H’) was used to assess the diversity of locally adapted breeds/ecotypes of goats and sheep in the territories, which was calculated for the number of animals present in the past and present on the farms [25]. Shannon’s index will be higher the greater the number of breeds and the uniformity of their abundance. If the index value is equal to 0, only one species is present in the territory. The H’ index is calculated as follows:
H = Σ [ ( p i ) . l o g ( p i ) ] ,
where
H = índice de diversidade de Shannon;
p i = proportion of individuals of the i-th species in an entire community;
Σ = symbol;
log = usually the natural logarithm, but the base of the logarithm is arbitrary (base 10 and 2 logarithms are also used);
p i = n N ;
n = individuals of a certain type/species;
N = total number of individuals in a community.
The minimum value that Shannon’s diversity index can take on is 0. This number would indicate the absence of diversity, as only one species/race/ecotype would be found in that habitat. The Shannon’s diversity index theoretically ranges from 0 to 5; however, empirical values commonly fall within the range of 1.5 to 3.5, with values exceeding 4.5 being exceptionally rare.
For a better interpretation of the diversity index, the uniformity was calculated as follows:
E = H / I n ( k )
where k is the number of locally adapted breeds/ecotypes cited by the interviewees. Uniformity gives a value between 0 and 1, and the closer it is to 1, the greater the diversity.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. History of Breeding

In this study, the terms breed and ecotype are used to describe different classifications of animal diversity. A breed is understood as a group of domestic animals with defined phenotypic traits and genetic identity, maintained through selective breeding and recognized by formal institutions. An ecotype, on the other hand, refers to a population that has adapted to specific local environmental conditions through natural and human-influenced selection, without necessarily having official recognition as a breed [26].
According to the oldest farmers interviewed (guardians), the most common farming system in the region since ancient times has been the diversified system, which involves the rearing of small ruminants for the most part but also includes other animal species such as cattle, poultry and pigs. This system has numerous advantages, including economic sustainability, proper use of pastures and better labor management [27]. Diversified production systems are widely employed by traditional communities, particularly in semi-arid regions, as a strategy for subsistence and socio-ecological resilience. Numerous studies have emphasized that productive diversity constitutes a central element in sustaining the autonomy of traditional farmers, as well as in safeguarding agrobiodiversity and the body of knowledge intrinsically linked to the territory [28,29].
All the interviewees expressed a strong emotional connection with their livestock. The animals are only sold at specific times to meet the family’s needs. In this study, the sheep farmers were asked about the breeds/ecotypes that were part of their emotional memory. They highlighted the lanzuda sheep as a significant component in the ancestral narrative of their lineage, information corroborated by Finan [30], who highlighted the great importance attributed by farmers to animal welfare, emphasizing the emotional bond shared between the family and the livestock.
This emotional connection with animals is not exclusive to small ruminant farmers. According to Schuppli [31], individuals involved in dairy farming also develop strong emotional connections with cattle, highlighting the importance of these animals beyond financial gain. In a study with stingless bees, it was identified that beekeepers are also in favor of conservation for emotional and esthetic reasons [32,33]. Thus, the appreciation of the animal in traditional communities transcends mere economic production, reflecting a deep recognition of the role that these living beings play in the lives and cultures of the communities.
Based on the farmers’ reports, there has been a dynamic change in the breeds and ecotypes present in the region. Ecotypes such as the Lanzuda and Cariri of the sheep species, as well as the Canindé, Azul, Vermelha, Nambi, and Mocha goat breeds/ecotypes with short hair and black backs, which were once quite evident, are now rare in the region. The ethnozootechnical approach made it possible to verify that breeders often use specific names for the ecotypes, which are the same ecotypes known by other names, which does not necessarily represent greater racial diversity.
The Nambi ecotype, for example, is known in most territories as Landi. This knowledge has a direct impact on the calculation of the diversity index, which can be overestimated or underestimated if it is not possible to verify when it is the same genotype with different names. On the other hand, the term “red goat”, used by the breeders, probably corresponds to the Parda Sertaneja, while the term “Tartaruga” suggests characteristics of crossbreeds of the Nubian breed with local ecotypes. It was also found that the term “Lombo Preto” is another name given to the Moxotó breed.
Another important observation made by breeders is that, according to them, “in the past, animals were healthier, got sick less and had less difficulty giving birth.” This is certainly due to the loss of genetic variability, with significant impacts on animal health and reproduction over time. When an animal population shows a reduction in genetic variability, it results in a lower capacity to face environmental and biological challenges [34].
Research carried out by Salles [35], Cardoso [36] and Pakpahan [37] with goats reveals that the decrease in genetic variability has serious consequences on the health and reproductive performance of the animals. In addition, Stachowicz [38], in a study with sheep, emphasizes the importance of monitoring and controlling inbreeding levels to maintain genetic variability, a necessary measure for the conservation of breeds/ecotypes.

3.2. Local Knowledge and Diversity of Genotypes

The farmers reported that the Azul, Canindé and Repartida goat genotypes existed in the Casaco and Coletivo territories more than 15 years ago. However, only the Azul still populates the region, albeit with few flocks. According to the farmers, the Graúna, Marota and Parda Sertaneja ecotypes were also common in the region but are no longer seen in the local landscape.
Of all the groups, the Moxotó goat breed still inhabits Folia territory. As these breeds and ecotypes disappear from the region, new groups appear and populate the landscape. Therefore, in addition to the groups that are still frequent in the region, breeders have pointed out new genetic groups, such as the Chuíte and the Olho de Prata, completely unknown to academia until now. Many of these new groups may just be different names for existing groups. The phenotypic characteristics of some of the breeds mentioned in this study are already described in the specialized literature, allowing for a detailed understanding of their morphological profiles, adaptive patterns, and productive traits [39,40].
Among the sheep genotypes present in the ancient landscape of the territories are the Cara Curta, Lanzuda and Santa Inês. These same genotypes are seen in the current landscape, with the exception of the Pé-duro ecotype. The breeders highlighted the Lanzuda ecotype as being very resistant. Many genotypes are no longer found in the region, and several studies highlight a strong association between this disappearance and the extinction of local knowledge, promoted by the modernization of livestock farming and the introduction of exotic material [41].
The growing importance of agro-industry and corporate power has restricted the viability of many small-scale systems as they become increasingly exposed to competition from the open market. The organization of agricultural and livestock systems according to the principles of an industrial factory, scientifically organized for mass production, has massively displaced and devalued traditional knowledge systems and the elements that make up these systems [42,43,44].
The introduction of imported genetic material, driven by globalization, has contributed to the erosion of local knowledge and biological diversity, as research in other regions of the world has reported [45,46]. The loss of biodiversity associated with the loss of local knowledge has had negative consequences for the conservation of animal genetic resources. Therefore, efforts must be made to safeguard biodiversity, traditional peoples and their knowledge systems [47].
Figure 2 shows the distribution of goats and sheep in the current and past landscape, according to the multiple correspondence analysis. In the past landscape, the coletivo territory had the greatest diversity of goats, followed by the Casaco territory. However, in the current landscape, this panorama has changed, indicating a loss of goat diversity. Only in the Casaco territory was there a greater diversity of breeds/ecotypes. The breeders showed concern about the exchange of breeding stock.
This study found that only 30% of the people interviewed knew of any locally adapted goat breed/ecotype. The majority of those interviewed (70%) had only heard of these animals or were unaware of them. The interviewees cited Marota, Moxotó and Graúna as the least known genotypes. On the other hand, they showed greater knowledge of exotic breeds, such as Anglo Nubiana and Boer, which populate the region and have been widely used to crossbreed and replace locally adapted breeds/genotypes. Among the goats, the Azul ecotype, the Canindé breed and the Nambi ecotype are the best known, perhaps due to social and development projects using these genotypes in the study region.
These findings reveal a concerning scenario regarding the preservation of traditional knowledge and the associated local biodiversity. The erosion of local knowledge is closely correlated with the decline of genetic resources in the territories where they have historically developed. This knowledge, built upon accumulated experience and orally transmitted across generations, constitutes an intangible heritage that is essential for the management, conservation, and sustainable use of animal biodiversity, particularly in contexts of traditional and subsistence agriculture. The loss of this knowledge weakens not only local production systems but also the socio-ecological resilience of the communities involved. Aswani [8] reports that, due to the interconnection between cultural and biological diversity, the loss of local and Indigenous knowledge is likely to seriously threaten the effective conservation of biodiversity, particularly in community-based local conservation efforts. Local knowledge is being transformed globally, and in many cases, lost. In many parts of the world, rural and Indigenous communities are facing profound cultural, economic, and environmental changes, which contribute to the weakening of their local knowledge base [8].
With regard to the knowledge and conservation of local breeds, the current trend towards the use of exotic breeds reflects policies to encourage the modernization of farming, which often prioritize productivity over the conservation of local genetic diversity. Rege and Ibson [48] point out that although public policies favor the introduction of exotic breeds motivated by the search for desirable characteristics, such as higher milk or meat productivity, this can unintentionally result in the erosion of traditional knowledge and the replacement of locally adapted breeds that are better suited to the environmental conditions of the region.
Ginja [49], in studies on genetic markers with Ibero-American native goat breeds, points out that the progressive abandonment of agriculture in marginal areas and uncontrolled crossbreeding with exotic breeds represent the greatest threat to existing breeds/ecotypes, leading to a decline in genetic diversity. In Africa, studies by Ouchene-Khelifi [50] and Chokoe [51] also highlight the loss of genetic diversity promoted by uncontrolled crossbreeding with exotic breeds.
The absence of gene flow within breeds in these territories is another factor contributing to the disappearance of certain breeds in this region, promoted by geographical isolation. Mdladla [52], using the ethnozootechnical approach, observed that genetic isolation over time had a significant influence on the genetic diversity of goat populations.
Regarding sheep, a greater diversity of breeds and ecotypes was observed in the ancient landscape, especially in the Borborema territory. In the current landscape, there has been a change in this scenario. The Folia territory showed greater diversity of sheep, indicating a change in the distribution of these breeds across the territories over time.
Of the interviewees, only 38% were familiar with the locally adapted sheep breeds or ecotypes, and at least 14% had heard of them. However, 50% of the interviewees are unaware of any locally adapted breed.
The most well-known sheep, according to the interviewees, are Morada Nova and Somali (75%), followed by Santa Inês sheep (49%). The vast majority of respondents are unaware of the Barriga Negra (88%), Rabo Largo (75%), and Cariri (67%) ecotypes. This is certainly due to the absence of herds of these groups in the region, which is associated with the low effective number and the high degree of threat they are subjected to, as indicated by some studies.
These results are also related to the introduction of exotic breeds, reinforcing the fact that the interviewees did not have the opportunity to know and interact with these genotypes in the local landscape. The literature on the strong association between the extinction of local knowledge and the loss of genetic material [8]. This knowledge is essential for the implementation of effective conservation and management strategies for these populations, aiming to preserve not only genetic diversity but also cultural and environmental richness, as these elements are intrinsically related.
Traditional breeding systems play a fundamental role in the conservation of local genetic diversity. By valuing these systems, it is possible to stimulate the recognition of the genetic potential of locally adapted breeds, essential material for sustainable breeding programs [15]. These genotypes have adapted to local environments and possess characteristics suitable for the specific conditions of their habitats. The maintenance of this genetic material contributes to the global resilience and sustainability of livestock production systems [53]. Furthermore, it is essential to empower and involve the breeders, holders of local knowledge, in the decision-making processes [54]. This will help ensure that their knowledge and experience are valued and incorporated into conservation and improvement programs.

3.3. Diversity Index

The Shannon diversity index (H’) obtained for goats in the prehistoric landscape was 1.3. In the current landscape, this index was significantly lower (0.87), which suggests a significant loss of breed/ecotype diversity over time in the studied territories, negatively impacting genetic variability. A similar study, conducted by Kuznetsov [55] with taurine breeds, observed a Shannon diversity index of 1.69, suggesting a moderate level of genetic diversity in these populations.
For sheep breeds/ecotypes, an H’ value of 0.7 was observed in the past landscape, while in the current landscape this value was slightly lower. (0.66). These values are considered low compared to those observed for goats; however, they remained constant over time. A study with locally adapted Iranian sheep breeds, using genetic markers, reported an average of 0.9 for the Shannon index, indicating a reasonable genetic diversity [56].
The locally adapted breeds and ecotypes in breeding systems are essential for the maintenance of agrobiodiversity. Maintaining this local diversity in animal production favors the integrity of these systems. This local genetic heritage enhances the dynamics of animal production systems, enabling access to genetic adaptive capacities that allow the animal to become established in the region, while the traditional knowledge of the human–animal relationship accumulated over the years continues to be passed on to future generations. More than maintaining productive practices, genetic diversity is essential for food security as it provides resources for the settlement and well-being of family farmers, promoting the availability of food for the future [57].
These findings provide important information about the genetic variation among different breeds and ecotypes of goats and sheep in the studied territories, highlighting the importance of proper conservation and management of these populations to ensure their long-term viability.

3.4. Criteria for Animal Selection

The interviewees highlighted the importance of choosing animals with uniform, harmonious, and esthetically pleasing conformation, which exhibit characteristics such as libido, vitality, and normal testicles. Furthermore, the preference for animals from healthy and defect-free parents was emphasized. Among the characteristics considered essential for breeders, testicle size and body uniformity were mentioned as attributes of greatest interest. The interviewees’ statements reflect the appreciation of specific characteristics in the selection of breeders, which can directly influence the quality and performance of future generations.
The interviewed breeders emphasized that cryptorchid, small, and feminine-looking animals should be disqualified and discarded. Based on the breeders’ reports, it was possible to identify specific criteria for the selection of goat and sheep breeders. (Table 1 and Table 2).
Several studies suggest that the choices of goat breeders are influenced by a combination of personal perceptions, market information, breeding experience, and animal characteristics, although there are regional variations in preferences [58,59,60].
The guardian breeders cited reproductive characteristics, the physical conformation of the individual, health, health history, parent production, and behavioral issues as being of great importance in the selection of an animal for reproduction. It became clear from the interviewees’ statements that the greatest emphasis is placed on the reproductive, adaptive, and health characteristics of the animals. Less importance was given to production characteristics (meat or milk).
In the Brazilian semi-arid region, Arandas [15] investigated the selection criteria adopted by breeders of the Morada Nova sheep breed, highlighting those related to the breed standard, notably the appearance and coat color of the animals, as the most important. Mbuku [61], in Africa, considered that their integrated systems of knowledge about the studied herds were adequate to identify that the breeding objectives are based on the appearance of the animals. In turn, Nandolo [62] observed criteria based on meat production in one community and non-productive criteria in other communities in Malawi. In these situations, distinct genetic improvement programs could produce better responses.
Liljestrand [63] found that, among Maasai herders, the reason for keeping animals is based on multiple objectives. Adaptive characteristics, such as disease and drought resistance, and productive traits, such as increased growth and carcass weight, were well classified by these breeders. Furthermore, the sheep holds social and traditional value in Maasai culture. Thus, goats and sheep contribute tangible and intangible benefits to family farming in arid and semi-arid regions, as reported by Kaumbata [64] and Guerrero-Gatica [65].
The most recent work by Tyasi [66], studying goats in Africa, found that the most preferred characteristics by breeders for females in the surveyed villages were the ability to have twin births, maternal ability, and body size in reproduction; while for males, they were mating ability, growth rate, and body size.
In general, studies in semi-arid regions indicate local criteria for selecting animals for reproduction in family farming systems, based on appearance and adaptive characteristics [15]. This information is useful for developing improvement programs for breeder communities, as demonstrated by Mueller [67]. On the other hand, studies conducted in controlled breeding systems adopt criteria more related to production, as these environments support animals of specialized breeds, for which the literature is extensive across all species.

4. Conclusions

The decline in genetic resources observed in the studied territories is closely associated with the progressive loss of traditional knowledge held by local communities regarding their locally adapted breeds, indicating an ongoing process of biocultural erosion that poses a threat to both biological diversity and cultural heritage.
The decrease in genetic diversity in the studied territories is concerning, as it represents a decline in the ability of these breeds to adapt to climate change. The introduction of exotic breeds is identified as a key factor contributing to this genetic erosion.
The study highlights the need to integrate the traditional knowledge of breeders into the conservation of breeds. The implementation of conservation and genetic improvement programs, based on the collected data, can contribute to the promotion of sustainable development in the Paraíba semi-arid region.
A long-term conservation strategy for these locally adapted breeds should prioritize participatory approaches that combine scientific methods with local knowledge, ensuring the conservation of genetic diversity and the strengthening of community resilience and regional sustainability. It is also essential to promote public policies aimed at valuing these breeds and recognizing the cultural and productive roles of local breeders. Additionally, the maintenance and strengthening of both in situ and ex situ conservation nuclei are fundamental to ensure the continuity of these genetic resources over time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C.S.; methodology, M.N.M., C.F.T.d.O., J.V.C., L.L.d.R., J.K.G.A. and M.N.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A.C.C. and R.C.S.; writing—review and editing, L.L.d.R., J.K.G.A. and M.N.R.; supervision, M.N.R.; funding acquisition, M.N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Brazil) provided a scholarship to the first author. This research was funded by the government of the state of Paraíba, number 01/2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted with farmers participating in a broader macroproject. No invasive procedures were involved, and all data collection followed rigorous methodological and ethical standards for research involving human participants, including the use of informed consent and the assurance of confidentiality. It was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles established in the Declaration of Helsinki, with full commitment to transparency, respect, and integrity in all interactions with participants.

Informed Consent Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and followed the guidelines of Resolution No. 466 of 12 December 2012 of the Brazilian National Health Council. All participants were informed about the objectives of the research and signed the Free and Informed Consent Form prior to data collection.

Data Availability Statement

Restrictions apply to the availability of these data. The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because they are part of an ongoing study and a larger project still under development. Requests for access to the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank AS-PTA Family Farming and Agroecology, PATAC—Program for the Application of Appropriate Technology to Communities, CENTRAC—Center for Cultural Action, and the Workers’ Union of Caraúbas—PB for their crucial support throughout the research. The collaboration of these organizations was essential to the success of the study. Animal Genetic Resources Network of the Northeast of Brazil (REDE RGA-NE). Red Iberoamericana Sobre Los Recursos Zoogenómicos y Su Resiliencia (Rezgen-IBA).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Monteiro, M.G.; Brisola, M.V.; Vieira filho, J.E.R. Diagnóstico da Cadeia Produtiva de Caprinos e Ovinos no Brasil; Ipea: Brasília, Brazil, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. IBGE—Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Resultados Do Censo Agropecuário De. 2017. Available online: https://censoagro2017.ibge.gov.br/templates/censo_agro/resultadosagro/index.html (accessed on 24 February 2024.).
  3. Queiroga, I.M.B.N.; Lins, J.G.G.; Oliveira, S.A.; Gonçalves, M.C.; Oliveira, L.S.; Perdigão, N.R.d.O.F.; da Penha, J.L. A cadeia produtiva da caprinocultura no estado da Paraíba. In Perspectivas Atuais em Estudos de Pequenos Ruminantes; Editora Científica Digital: São Paulo, Brazil, 2024; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Marques, C.A. Hierarquização Dos Principais Problemas Identificados Na Cadeia Produtiva Da Ovinocultura No Cariri Paraibano. 2021. Available online: http://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br:8080/xmlui/handle/riufcg/41461 (accessed on 4 June 2025).
  5. Lombana, H.G.; Ospina, O.; Torres, M. O-077 Application of a knowledge management system in sheep and goat producers. Adv. Anim. Biosci. 2023, 14, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alves, A.G.C.; Pires, D.A.F.; Ribeiro, M.N. Conhecimento Local e Produção Animal: Uma Perspectiva Baseada na Etnozootecnia. Arch. Zootec. 2010, 59, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Laurans, R. L’ethnozootechnie aux confins des sciences de l’homme, de l’écologie et des techniques de l’élevage. Ethnozootechnie 1977, 20, 5–12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aswani, S.; Lemahieu, A.; Sauer, W.H.H. Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Deb, D. The erosion of biodiversity and culture: Bankura district of West Bengal as an illustrative locale. Ecol. Econ. Soc.–INSEE J. 2022, 5, 139–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaumbata, W.; Nakimbugwe, H.; Nandolo, W.; Banda, L.J.; Mészáros, G.; Gondwe, T.; Woodward-Greene, M.J.; Rosen, B.D.; Van Tassell, C.P.; Sölkner, J.; et al. Experiences from the implementation of community-based goat breeding programs in Malawi and Uganda: A potential approach for conservation and improvement of indigenous small ruminants in smallholder farms. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Choudhary, D.K.; Garkoti, S.C. Transhumant pastoralism in Indian western Himalaya: Traditional ecological knowledge and contemporary practices. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2024, 31, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kereto, J.; Oywaya Nkurumwa, A.; Obara, J.; Mango, N. Livestock management and protection using indigenous technical knowledge among the Maasai of Narok County. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2022, 8, 2040793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mustefa, A. Significance of community based breeding programs to conservation and sustainable utilization of small ruminants in Ethiopia. A review. Small Rumin. Res. 2023, 226, 107040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tade, B.; Melesse, A.; Betsha, S. Describing the Traditional Breeding Practices for Improvement of Genetics of Indigenous Goat Populations in South Gondar, Ethiopia. Glob. J. Anim. Sci. Res. 2022, 10, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  15. Arandas, J.K.G.; Alves, Â.G.C.; Facó, O.; Belchior, E.B.; Shiotsuki, L.; de Arruda Leite, P.M.B.; Ribeiro, M.N. Do traditional sheep breeders perform conscious selection? An example from a participatory breeding program of Morada Nova sheep. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2017, 49, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Allaire, J.J. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R; Posit Software, PBC: Boston, MA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Elliott, R.; Shapiro, D.A. Brief Structured Recall: A more efficient method for studying significant therapy events. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 1988, 61, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soldati, G.T.; Pereira, A.R.; da Silva, R.H.; de Moura, J.M.B.; Costa, H.C.; Chaves, L.d.S. Why Is the Frequency of a Risk More Important than Its Severity in Retaining Adaptive Information? A Multilevel Analysis of Human Evolution Using Snakes as Models. Biol. Theory 2024, 19, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Romney, A.K.; Weller, S.C. Predicting informant accuracy from patterns of recall among individuals. Soc. Netw. 1984, 6, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gavin, M.C.; Anderson, G.J. Testing a rapid quantitative ethnobiological technique: First steps towards developing a critical conservation tool. Econ. Bot. 2005, 59, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Golden, C.D.; Wrangham, R.W.; Brashares, J.S. Practical directions for the use of recall data in conservation science. Anim. Conserv. 2013, 16, 608–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dudek, D. Automated Information Extraction and Classification of Matrix-Based Questionnaire Data; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 109–120. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dickinson, W.B. Correspondence analysis of qualitative data. In The Routledge Reviewer’s Guide to Mixed Methods Analysis; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; pp. 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  24. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, 8th ed.; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  25. Shannon, C.E.; Wiener, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 1949. [Google Scholar]
  26. FAO. The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; Barbara Rischkowsky & Dafydd Pilling: Rome, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  27. Muluneh, B.; Kebede, K.; Mekasha, Y. Characterization of Indigenous Goat Breeding Practices and Production System in West Gojjam Zone, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 2016, 6, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosa-Schleich, J.; Loos, J.; Ferrante, M.; Mußhoff, O.; Tscharntke, T. Mixed farmers’ perception of the ecological-economic performance of diversified farming. Ecol. Econ. 2024, 220, 108174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Valencia, V.; Wittman, H.; Blesh, J. Structuring Markets for Resilient Farming Systems. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 39, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Finan, A. For the love of goats: The advantages of alterity. Agric. Hum. Values 2011, 28, 81–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schuppli, C.A.; Spooner, J.M.; von Keyserlingk, M.A. Canadian dairy farmer views about animal welfare. Anim. Welf. 2023, 32, e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Carvalho, R.M.A.; Arandas, J.K.G.; Martins, C.F.; da Nóbrega Alves, R.R.; Alves, Â.G.C. Are beekeepers conservation-friendly? A study on attitudes and values toward animals among small-scale farmers. Ethnobiol. Conserv. 2024, 13, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Carvalho, R.M.A.; Martins, C.F.; Alves, R.R.N.; Alves, Â.G.C. Do emotions influence the motivations and preferences of keepers of stingless bees? J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2018, 14, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kardos, M.; Armstrong, E.E.; Fitzpatrick, S.W.; Hauser, S.; Hedrick, P.W.; Miller, J.M.; Tallmon, D.A.; Funk, W.C. The crucial role of genome-wide genetic variation in conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2104642118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Salles, P.d.A.; Santos, S.C.; Rondina, D.; Weller, M. Genetic variability of six indigenous goat breeds using major histocompatibility complex-associated microsatellite markers. J. Veter-Sci. 2011, 12, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cardoso, T.F.; Amills, M.; Bertolini, F.; Rothschild, M.; Marras, G.; Boink, G.; Jordana, J.; Capote, J.; Carolan, S.; Hallsson, J.H.; et al. Patterns of homozygosity in insular and continental goat breeds. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2018, 50, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pakpahan, S.; Widayanti, R.; Artama, W.T.; Budisatria, I.G.S.; Lühken, G. Genetic variability of the prion protein gene in Indonesian goat breeds. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2023, 55, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Stachowicz, K.; Brito, L.F.; De Oliveira, H.R.; Miller, S.P.; Schenkel, F.S. Assessing genetic diversity of various Canadian sheep breeds through pedigree analyses. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 98, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Eloy, A.M.X.; da Costa, A.L.; Cavalcante, A.; da Silva, E.R.; de Sousa, F.B.; da Silva, F.L.R.; Alves, F.; Vieira, L.D.S.; Barros, N.; Pinheiro, R. Criação de Caprinos e Ovinos; Embrapa Informação Tecnológica: Brasília, DF, Brazil, 2007; p. 89. [Google Scholar]
  40. Associação Brasileira de Criadores de Ovinos—ARCO. (n.d.). Padrões Raciais. Available online: https://www.arcoovinos.com.br/PadraoRacial (accessed on 24 February 2024).
  41. Krätli, S. Issues of Declining Livestock Breeds: Revisiting Domestic Animal Diversity in Pastoral Systems. Pastures Pastor. 2023, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Galindo, P.; Ruiz, A.; De Cabo, D. Agroecología y Consumo Responsible; Teoría y Práctica; Kehaceres: Madrid, Spain, 2006; pp. 12–17. [Google Scholar]
  43. Toledo, V.M. Diez tesis sobre la crisis de la modernidad. Polis Rev. Latinoam. 2012, 11, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gómez-Baggethun, E.; Mingorría, S.; Reyes-García, V.; Calvet, L.; Montes, C. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: Empirical study in the doñana natural areas. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Collantes, J. Intensificación productiva y pérdida de ruralidad, en el origen de la merma de conocimiento natural: El ejemplo del ganadero de la Comarca de San Sebastián. Ería 2021, 41, 223–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sharma, R.; Arora, R.; Ahlawat, S. Valorization of Indigenous Livestock and Poultry—An Approach towards their Conservation. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2022, 35, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ridwan, Q.; Wani, Z.A.; Hanief, M.; Pant, S.; Shah, A.A.; Siddiqui, S.; Alamri, S. indigenous knowledge and perception of local people towards biodiversity conservation in Rajouri district of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rege, J.; Gibson, J. Animal genetic resources and economic development: Issues in relation to economic valuation. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 45, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ginja, C.; Gama, L.T.; Martínez, A.; Sevane, N.; Martin-Burriel, I.; Lanari, M.R.; Revidatti, M.A.; Aranguren-Méndez, J.A.; Bedotti, D.O.; Ribeiro, M.N.; et al. Genetic diversity and patterns of population structure in Creole goats from the Americas. Anim. Genet. 2017, 48, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ouchene-Khelifi, N.-A.; Lafri, M.; Pompanon, F.; Ouhrouch, A.; Ouchene, N.; Blanquet, V.; Lenstra, J.A.; Benjelloun, B.; Da Silva, A. Genetic homogeneity of North-African goats. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chokoe, T.C.; Hadebe, K.; Muchadeyi, F.C.; Nephawe, K.A.; Dzomba, E.F.; Mphahlele, T.D.; Matelele, T.C.; Mtileni, B.J. Conservation status and historical relatedness of South African communal indigenous goat populations using a genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism marker. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 909472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mdladla, K.; Dzomba, E.F.; Muchadeyi, F.C. Landscape genomics and pathway analysis to understand genetic adaptation of South African indigenous goat populations. Heredity 2018, 120, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gunia, M.; Mandonnet, N.; Arquet, R.; de la Chevrotière, C.; Naves, M.; Mahieu, M.; Alexandre, G. Production systems of Creole goat and their implications for a breeding programme. Animal 2010, 4, 2099–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mapiye, C.; Chikwanha, O.C.; Chimonyo, M.; Dzama, K. Strategies for sustainable use of indigenous cattle genetic resources in Southern Africa. Diversity 2019, 11, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kuznetsov, V.M. Information-entropy approach to the analysis of genetic diversity of populations (analytical review). Agric. Sci. Euro-North-East 2022, 23, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alnajm, H.; Alijani, S.; Javanmard, A.; Rafat, S.A.; Hasanpur, K. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Four Sheep Breeds of Iran: Towards Genetic Maintenance and Conservation Decision. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2021, 11, 527–538. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sponenberg, D.P.; Martin, A.; Couch, C.; Beranger, J. Conservation Strategies for Local Breed Biodiversity. Diversity 2019, 11, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alexandre, G.; Leimbacher, F.; Maurice, O.; Domarin, D.; Naves, M.; Mandonnet, N. Goat farming systems in Martinique: Management and breeding strategies. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2009, 41, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tetteh, B.K.D.; Ansah, I.G.K.; Donkoh, S.A.; Appiah-Twumasi, M.; Avornyo, F.K.; Shaibu, M.T.; Partey, S.; Zougmore, R.B.; Tengan, K.; Nyuor, A.; et al. Perceptions of weather variability and climate change on goat producers’ choice of coping and adaptation strategies: Evidence from climate-smart and non-climate-smart villages in the Jirapa and Lawra districts. Clim. Dev. 2020, 12, 614–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ume, S.I.; Ezeano, C.; Jiwuba, P. Effect of Goat Production to the Environment in the Humid Tropics of the World; SciPress Ltd.: Wollerau, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  61. Mbuku, S.M.; Kosgey, I.S.; Kahi, A.K. Identification systems and selection criteria for small ruminants among pastoralist communities in northern Kenya: Prospects for a breeding programme. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2010, 42, 1487–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Nandolo, W.; Wurzinger, M.; Mészáros, G.; Van Tassell, C.; Gondwe, T.; Mulindwa, H.; Sölkner, J. Identification of breeding objectives in community based goat breeding programmes in Malawi. Acta Agric. Slov. 2016, 5, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liljestrand, J. Breeding Practices of Red Maasai Sheep in Maasai Pastoralist Communities. Master’s Thesis, Animal Breeding and Genetics, Rahway, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kaumbata, W.; Banda, L.; Mészáros, G.; Gondwe, T.; Woodward-Greene, M.J.; Rosen, B.D.; Van Tassell, C.P.; Sölkner, J.; Wurzinger, M. Tangible and intangible benefits of local goats rearing in smallholder farms in Malawi. Small Rumin. Res. 2020, 187, 106095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guerrero-Gatica, M.; Mujica, M.I.; Barceló, M.; Vio-Garay, M.F.; Gelcich, S.; Armesto, J.J. Traditional and local knowledge in chile: Review of experiences and insights for management and sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tyasi, T.L.; Ng’ambi, J.; Mogashoa, S. Breeding practices and trait preferences of goat keepers at Lepelle-Nkumpi Local Municipality, South Africa: Implication for the design of breeding programmes. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022, 54, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mueller, J.P.; Rischkowsky, B.; Haile, A.; Philipsson, J.; Mwai, O.; Besbes, B.; Valle Zárate, A.; Tibbo, M.; Mirkena, T.; Duguma, G.; et al. Community-based livestock breeding programmes: Essentials and examples. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2015, 132, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of the study site, highlighting the region analyzed in the state of Paraíba, Northeast Brazil. Source [16]. The colors on the map represent the municipalities that make up the study area: Soledade (light green), São Vicente (dark blue), Esperança (yellow), Queimadas (light brown), Campina Grande (red), Boqueirão (dark brown), Aroeiras (dark green), and Caraúbas (black).
Figure 1. Map of the study site, highlighting the region analyzed in the state of Paraíba, Northeast Brazil. Source [16]. The colors on the map represent the municipalities that make up the study area: Soledade (light green), São Vicente (dark blue), Esperança (yellow), Queimadas (light brown), Campina Grande (red), Boqueirão (dark brown), Aroeiras (dark green), and Caraúbas (black).
Ruminants 05 00026 g001
Figure 2. Representation of the data through the two-dimensional plane correspondence analysis of the presence or absence of the breeds/species in the different territories (groups). Goats’ Past Presence (CAPRIPP), Goats’ Current Presence (CAPRIPA), Sheep’s Past Presence (OVINOPP), and Sheep’s Current Presence (OVINOPA) in the territories studied. The red color indicates the species studied (goats and sheep), while the blue color represents the territories where the data were collected.
Figure 2. Representation of the data through the two-dimensional plane correspondence analysis of the presence or absence of the breeds/species in the different territories (groups). Goats’ Past Presence (CAPRIPP), Goats’ Current Presence (CAPRIPA), Sheep’s Past Presence (OVINOPP), and Sheep’s Current Presence (OVINOPA) in the territories studied. The red color indicates the species studied (goats and sheep), while the blue color represents the territories where the data were collected.
Ruminants 05 00026 g002
Table 1. Selection criteria for choosing breeders according to the interviewed breeders.
Table 1. Selection criteria for choosing breeders according to the interviewed breeders.
CharacteristicsNGuardians’ Report
Coat1“With short and straight hair.”
Size3
Parents’ history3“Good lineage.”
“Son of a good wet nurse, with a good nipple, no defects, and the mother without problems with the mãe coco 4.”
Libido3“More fiery.”
“Being active.”
“Usually whit the mother of a single offspring, it is the one that pursues the female the most.”
Body conformation4“The most beautiful, bigger, less chubby, and well-made.”
“Tall, and without nibs. For meat; heavy and thick body, and gentle.”
“Tall and long animal with a broad chest”
“When the animal is born, we can see the body trunk.”
Testicle conformation3“Animal with well-developed testicles.”
“Normal testicle.”
“Don’t be roconho 5.”
Temperament2“For males; naughtier, smarter”
“Choose the most lively.”
4 “Mãe coco” is a regional term for uterine prolapse. 5 “Roconho” refers to the animal with cryptorchidism.
Table 2. Selection criteria for choosing matrices according to the reports of the interviewed creators.
Table 2. Selection criteria for choosing matrices according to the reports of the interviewed creators.
CharacteristicsNGuardians’ Report
Parents’ history3“No defect and the mother has no problems with the mãe coco.”
Maternal ability “Good mother.”
Udder Conformation2“Udder with bottle nipple, the udder cannot be too low and white.”
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, R.C.; Melo, M.N.; de Oliveira, C.F.T.; Cardoso, J.V.; Cevallos, L.A.C.; da Rocha, L.L.; Arandas, J.K.G.; Ribeiro, M.N. Ethnozootechnical Perspectives on the Decline of Traditional Knowledge About Local Goat and Sheep Breeds in the Semi-Arid Region of Paraíba, Brazil. Ruminants 2025, 5, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5020026

AMA Style

Silva RC, Melo MN, de Oliveira CFT, Cardoso JV, Cevallos LAC, da Rocha LL, Arandas JKG, Ribeiro MN. Ethnozootechnical Perspectives on the Decline of Traditional Knowledge About Local Goat and Sheep Breeds in the Semi-Arid Region of Paraíba, Brazil. Ruminants. 2025; 5(2):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5020026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Raissa C., Marilene N. Melo, Carlos F. T. de Oliveira, José V. Cardoso, Luis A. C. Cevallos, Laura L. da Rocha, Janaina K. G. Arandas, and Maria N. Ribeiro. 2025. "Ethnozootechnical Perspectives on the Decline of Traditional Knowledge About Local Goat and Sheep Breeds in the Semi-Arid Region of Paraíba, Brazil" Ruminants 5, no. 2: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5020026

APA Style

Silva, R. C., Melo, M. N., de Oliveira, C. F. T., Cardoso, J. V., Cevallos, L. A. C., da Rocha, L. L., Arandas, J. K. G., & Ribeiro, M. N. (2025). Ethnozootechnical Perspectives on the Decline of Traditional Knowledge About Local Goat and Sheep Breeds in the Semi-Arid Region of Paraíba, Brazil. Ruminants, 5(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ruminants5020026

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop