Next Article in Journal
Relaxation and Fascination through Outside Views of Mexican Dwellings
Next Article in Special Issue
Promoting Social Interaction through Participatory Architecture. Experimentation, Experience, Evaluation in a Social Housing Complex (Grand’Goule, Poitiers, 1974–2021)
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Disaster Resilience: Toward a Role for Design in Disaster Mitigation and Recovery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Co-Designing Age-Friendly Neighborhood Spaces in Copenhagen: Starting with an Age-Friendly Co-Design Process
 
 
Review

2Ws + 1H Systematic Review to (Re)Draw Actors and Challenges of Participation(s): Focus on Cultural Heritage

1
BATir Department, École Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
2
National School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Carthage, Archaeological Site of Carthage, Carthage 2026, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Avi Friedman, Catherine Elsen, Clémentine Schelings and Yaprak Hamarat
Architecture 2022, 2(2), 307-333; https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2020018
Received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 12 March 2022 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published: 13 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contemporary Issues in Participatory Architecture)
The Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society, better known as the Faro Convention, emphasizes the relevance of participation in cultural heritage and its clear potential benefits. Despite the growing literature on participation in cultural heritage, little research through systematic reviews has been conducted in this field. This paper explores definitions of participation, its actors, and its challenges with a focus on cultural heritage, and it aims to fill this gap by providing a systematic literature review based on PRISMA 2020 guidelines and Okoli guidelines. The results reflect on the definition of participation, the different actors involved, and the challenges facing participation in cultural heritage, based on the interactions of actors. Results further indicate that participation in cultural heritage specifically is in an early stage of adoption and that considerable effort is needed in assessing the adequate methodologies to face the challenges. View Full-Text
Keywords: participation; cultural heritage; state of art; cultural heritage; actors of participation; challenges of participation; democracy participation; cultural heritage; state of art; cultural heritage; actors of participation; challenges of participation; democracy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Stiti, K.; Ben Rajeb, S. 2Ws + 1H Systematic Review to (Re)Draw Actors and Challenges of Participation(s): Focus on Cultural Heritage. Architecture 2022, 2, 307-333. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2020018

AMA Style

Stiti K, Ben Rajeb S. 2Ws + 1H Systematic Review to (Re)Draw Actors and Challenges of Participation(s): Focus on Cultural Heritage. Architecture. 2022; 2(2):307-333. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2020018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stiti, Khaoula, and Samia Ben Rajeb. 2022. "2Ws + 1H Systematic Review to (Re)Draw Actors and Challenges of Participation(s): Focus on Cultural Heritage" Architecture 2, no. 2: 307-333. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture2020018

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop