Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Climate Resilience of Forage Ecosystems Through Sustainable Intensification and Educational Knowledge Transfer in the Southeastern USA
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Properties and Microelement Availability in Crops for Human Health: An Overview
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

SNP Effects on Yield and Agronomic Traits in an International Winter Wheat Collection Grown in Western Siberia

1
Department of Agrotechnology, Omsk State Agrarian University Named After P.A. Stolypin, Institutskaya Square, 1, Omsk 644008, Russia
2
Department of Biodiversity, Al Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave., 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
3
The Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Timiryazev St., 45, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crops 2025, 5(4), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/crops5040041
Submission received: 18 May 2025 / Revised: 3 July 2025 / Accepted: 8 July 2025 / Published: 10 July 2025

Abstract

The extension of genetic diversity is the basis for yield and adaptability improvements of winter wheat varieties under climate fluctuations. In the present study, an international collection consisting of 96 winter bread wheat accessions from Russia, Germany, Finland, Kazakhstan, Bulgaria, Turkey, the USA, and the international programme (Turkey–CIMMYT–ICARDA) was analysed under the conditions of Western Siberia during three growing seasons. Yield and yield-related traits were recorded following standard agronomy practices. Genotyping of the germplasm panel was conducted using 55 KASP markers at the Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology (Kazakhstan). The yield had a high correlation with the number of fertile tillers per unit area (0.68), which indicates significant yield reduction in wheat accessions from different origins that are not adaptive to the conditions of Western Siberia. The main stable QTLs associated with yield-related traits during two growing seasons, ippb_ta_1147 (1A), ippb_ta_107 (4A), ippb_ta_239 (5D), and ippb_ta_283 (6A), can be used in MAS for the improvement of yield and related traits. The outperforming genotypes Zhiva, Zolushka, Doneko, Line K 18918, Line 2293; CO13D1299, KS13DH0030-32, Gondvana//HBK0935-29-15/KS90W077-2-2/VBF0589-1… are recommended to be included in hybridisation programmes and represent promising sources for breeding high-yielding and climate-resilient winter wheat.

1. Introduction

Winter wheat is the main cereal crop that meets the growing global demand for food. In the context of climate change, Western Siberia, due to the increased thermal suitability of the high-latitude region, is considered to be a promising area for winter wheat cultivation, which possess a higher yield compared to spring wheat [1,2]. For the development of high-yielding winter wheat varieties, it is crucial to select suitable donor genotypes from the wheat accessions stored in gene banks. This process depends critically on the density of information on the individual characteristics of the accessions [3,4]. Competitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) markers play a significant role in improving different target agronomic traits and promote genetic studies, such as genetic diversity analysis, genome-wide association studies, and MAS, in wheat [5,6,7,8]. A total of 70 KASP assays were validated for reliability in a panel of 300 diverse wheat cultivars and proved their ability to accelerate the characterisation of crossing parents and advanced lines for MAS [9].
QTLs with pleiotropic effects on yield-related traits have significant potential in breeding practice. For instance, pleiotropic cluster QTL (QSc/Sl.cib-5A and QSc/Sl.cib-6A) simultaneously affects plant height, thousand kernel weight, and kernel length [10]. Based on genome-wide association studies for 285 regional wheat lines, Zhao et al. [11] found that SNPs AX-111917292 and AX-109124553 on chromosome 5D were associated with wheat water absorption and thousand kernel weight. KASP markers associated with grain yield traits are important for the development of winter wheat yield potential improvement. In the study by Yang et al. [12], 266 recombinant inbred lines were genotyped using the wheat 660 K SNP array, and yield traits-friendly KASP markers were developed for marker-assisted selection. KASP markers for the unique sequences of the QYld.osu-1BS allele were developed in a population of 260 doubled haploid lines derived from the cross of winter wheat varieties Duster and Billings. They are aimed at breeding novel varieties with increased grain yield [13]. The genome-wide association study on a panel of 236 bread wheat varieties that were phenotyped in three experiments at two locations in Florida suggested that utilising MAS can enhance grain yield and harvest index of bread wheat [14]. Despite the economic efficiency of high-throughput genotyping [15], phenotyping and genotyping of individual accessions from genetic resource collections—including for low-heritability traits—alongside implementing diverse selection strategies remain crucial for enhancing winter wheat yield [16,17]. The analyses of genetic diversity in winter wheat germplasm suggested that wheat germplasm from other countries should be adopted to create new wheat germplasm with increased genetic diversity [18,19]. The evaluation of the effects of gene alleles on the phenotypic manifestation of agronomic traits allows for the determination of priority traits when selecting breeding material in specific soil and climatic conditions [20,21]. Genotyping of the winter wheat accession collection and analysis of the effects of SNPs in identified genes on yield and agronomic traits enabled the determination of genetic sources of high adaptability and productivity and increased the efficiency of assessment of genetic diversity and breeding value of winter wheat germplasm in Western Siberia.
Currently, only a few studies have used GWAS to identify SNPs associated with agronomic traits in Western Siberian wheat varieties [22,23]; therefore, the purpose of this study was (1) to analyse the effects of SNPs on the yield and its components and (2) to select genetic sources from the winter wheat collection of different origins for breeding programmes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Trials and Phenotyping

In this study, an international collection of 96 winter bread wheat accessions from Russia, Germany, Finland, Kazakhstan, Bulgaria, Turkey, the USA, and the international TCI programme (Turkey–CIMMYT–ICARDA) was analysed in the southern forest-steppe of Western Siberia (Supplementary Table S1). The plant material was grown in the field without fertilisation, chemical plant protection products, and irrigation. The experiments were conducted over three growing seasons (2022, 2023, and 2024), with the accessions planted in the field following black fallow. The accessions were distributed in plots, each measuring 1 m2 and spaced 0.15 m apart, with a sowing rate of 500 seeds per plot. The plots were arranged in a randomised design in three replicates. The standard included the medium-maturity winter bread wheat variety Omskaya 4. Yield and yield-related traits were recorded following standard agronomy practices. The yield components were recorded following methodological guidelines for exploring the wheat collection [24] on 20 individual plants per replicate in three replicates each year, resulting in a total of 180 plants per accession over the three-year period.
The Omsk region is located at GPS coordinates 55.0246° N and 73.3105° E. The experimental field’s soil type is thin meadow-chernozem, with an organic matter content of 3.5% to 4%. The region has a sharply continental climate, with an average annual precipitation of approximately 300–380 mm and a sum of effective temperatures ranging from 2000 °C to 2100 °C. The factors limiting wheat grain yield include insufficient rainfall, the threat of soil erosion by wind, and low phosphorus content. The average duration of the winter period is 164 days, with soil freezing to depths of 165–220 cm and snow cover varying between 20 and 25 cm.
Weather conditions varied during the vegetative periods of this study. The precipitation regime was categorised using Selyaninov’s Hydrothermic Coefficient (HTC): HTC > 1—wet season, HTC < 1—drought season. In the summer of 2022, there was a drought; the HTC was 0.91. Precipitation fluctuated: 6 mm was registered in May, representing 35% of the long-term average for that month. The temperature regime corresponded to the long-term average. The weather conditions in 2023 were characterised as extremely dry (HTC = 0.63). In May, there was insufficient rainfall (12 mm), whereas precipitation exceeded the long-term average in August and early September (46 mm). The summer of 2024 was characterised as excessively humid, which exceeded the long-term average by 200 mm; the HTC was registered at 1.49. In the winter period of 2021–2022, there was a lower snow depth (20.1 cm) compared to 2022–2023 (24.9 cm), while the average daily temperatures did not differ significantly. In the winter period of 2023–2024, the snow depth was less than that in the 2022–2023 season by 10 mm.

2.2. DNA Extraction and SNP Genotyping

Research at the Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology (IPBB, Kazakhstan) mapped more than 100 QTLs of economically valuable traits of spring bread wheat as a result of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) [25,26]. Quantitative trait loci mapping was performed as previously described by Amalova et al. [27]. To validate stably detected QTLs, KASP markers were developed. Fifty-five of these markers, associated with genes of the main agronomic traits (including the number of days to heading and maturity, yield, grain quality, and resistance to fungal diseases), were used to genotype 96 winter wheat accessions (Supplementary Table S2). Detailed information on these KASP markers was provided in a previous study [28].
Genomic DNA was extracted in triplicate from young leaves using the modified Delaporta et al. protocol [29]. The extracted DNA was purified using commercial kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentration and quality were assessed by spectrophotometry (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The composition of the isolated DNA was determined according to the optical density (OD260/OD280). The DNA concentration for each sample was adjusted to 50 ng/μL.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The yield and yield components differences were evaluated using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation. The significance of differences (p < 0.05) between mean values of accessions groups (SNP position—A/G) was determined by the Student’s t-test with Bonferroni correction. The analysis used R-statistics Open 4.4.2. URL: http://www.r-project.org (accessed on 7 July 2025).
The broad-sense heritability (H2) was calculated using the following formula:
H 2 = σ 2 G σ 2 G + σ 2 G x E n E + σ e 2 n E ,
where σ2G, σ2GxE, and σ2e are the mean square deviations of the genotype, genotype/environment interaction, and residual variance, respectively; nE is the number of growing seasons.

3. Results

3.1. Field Experiment and Phenotyping

The highest yield occurred in 2023 (Table 1), which can be explained by better plant survival under winter conditions and high fertile tiller density (101 units).
The better moisture conditions in 2024 were not favourable for yield (215 g/m2) due to the effects of frosts in May up to −15 °C that provoked the smallest number of tillers per unit area (66.5). Depending on vegetative period, the number of grains per spike ranged from 29.5 to 40.6 units, and the grain weight per plant ranged from 1.70 to 2.40 g, respectively. The thousand kernel weight showed low variability (33.2–38.1 g) under the conditions of Western Siberia. All studied traits had moderate broad-sense heritability ranging from 0.54 to 0.66. The results of a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed significant differences among the 96 genotypes for NFT (73%), GWP (82%), and TKW (90%). The environment had a highly significant influence on NGS (51%), GWS (39%), and yield (32%).
Phenotyping evaluation of the winter wheat collection during the three years revealed significant interannual variation in yield-related traits (Figure 1), particularly for fertile tiller density (66.5–101 units) and yield (173–315 g/m2). In 2022, there was a severe spring drought, which greatly affected yield (173 g/m2) and other yield-related traits. In 2023, there was optimal plant survival under winter conditions, while 2024 was characterised by severe frosts in May.
Table 2 presents trait correlations across the 2022–2024 vegetative periods.
Yield showed a high correlation with the number of fertile tillers per unit area (0.68) but only a weak association with the number of grains per spike (0.13) and grain weight per plant (0.18). This indicates a significant yield reduction in wheat accessions from different ecological groups that are not adapted to the conditions of Western Siberia. Negative correlation coefficients between the number of fertile tillers per unit area and spike length (−0.35) as well as grain weight per spike (−0.05) may indicate reduced spike productivity when the number of fertile tillers per square metre increases. Grain weight per plant had a positive effect on both grain weight per spike and thousand kernel weight (r = 0.42 and r = 0.65, respectively).

3.2. Analysis of SNP Effects

Kazakhstan is the nearest region to the Omsk region, where the stable QTLs for yield-related traits, disease resistance, duration of vegetation, and grain quality were previously identified via GWAS analysis. Based on phenotyping and analysis of SNP effects in the Omsk region over the three growing seasons, 13 KASP markers reliably associated (p < 0.05) with yield and yield-related traits were detected (Table 3 and Table 4).
For the spike length trait, two SNPs (ipbb_ta_149 and ipbb_ta_261) were found on chromosomes 2B and 4A, with phenotypic variation 2–6% (Table 4). The presence of the favourable allele reliably increased the spike length by 0.43–0.64 cm for one growing season. The favourable allele of locus ippb_ta_229 significantly enhanced the number of fertile tillers per unit area under the dry conditions in 2022 and 2023—27.5 and 26.2, respectively.
Loci ipbb_ta_239 and ipbb_ta_283 provided the formation of more fertile tillers per unit area during two growing seasons (average 7.7 and 6.1, respectively), while SNP ipbb_ta_239 was contained in the genotype of only 10% of the accessions. Three SNPs (ipbb_ta_114, ipbb_ta_260, ipbb_ta_229) were associated with an increased number of grains per spike (1.82–6.01 units), and locus ipbb_ta_114 explained the most phenotypic variation in this trait (6–11%).
For the grain weight per spike trait, no significant associations were identified for loci ippb_ta_114 and ippb_ta_229 (0.16–0.36 g), which were located on chromosomes 1A and 6A (Table 4). In 2024, the presence of SNP ippb_ta_116 was accompanied by a significant increase in grain weight per plant and thousand kernel weight (2.08 and 5.80 g, respectively). The locus ippb_ta_274 located on chromosome 1B determined a significant increase in yield in 2023 (102.7 g/m2), while locus ippb_ta_107 was associated with increasing yield by 57.4–65.0 g/m2 for two growing seasons.

3.3. Outperforming Genotypes Revealed on Yield

No linear relationship was observed between total yield and the number of favourable alleles (Table 5). However, accessions possessing 7–12 favourable alleles exhibited higher yield (297–495 g/m2) compared to the standard variety Omskaya 4 (288 g/m2). The US variety CO13D1299 demonstrated significantly superior yield (495 g/m2), with 10 favourable alleles in its genotype, including low-frequency alleles (ippb_ta_239 and ippb_ta_283).
High-yielding varieties included Zhiva, Donskaya Lira, Donna, Zolushka, Doneko (Russia), Darunok Podilla (Bulgaria), Gelibolu (Türkiye), KS13DH0030-32, SYWolf (USA), WBLL1*2/Kuruku/5/Chuen-Mai 18…, OCW03S667T-2/KS020986~1 (TCI)—328–389 g/m2. The accessions from the USA were also characterised by a large number of fertile tillers per square metre (131–139 pcs/m2), which was favourable for their yield.
The lines of the international TCI programme were obtained through step crossings; in particular, the pedigree of one line includes the Chinese variety of synthetic wheat, Chuenmai 18 (Table 5). Due to good stem growth (115–126 tillers per m2) and an enhanced number of grains per spike, two lines, WBLL1*2/Kuruku/5/Chuenmai 18… and OCW03S667T-2/KS020986~1, were not inferior in yield to the Omskaya 4 standard (369–389 g/m2).

4. Discussion

Phenotypic investigation of yield and yield-related traits was conducted from 2022 to 2024. Analysis of phenotypic variability of the studied traits indicated the strong effect of environmental conditions on these traits. In Western Siberia, due to harsh winter conditions, the number of fertile tillers per square metre and yield are accordingly dependent on the winter hardiness of genotypes. These traits were the most variable between 2022 and 2024 (66.5–101 tillers and 173–315 g/m2, respectively). The highest heritability (average 0.60) was detected for the traits of NGS and GWP (Table 1). A total of 13 QTLs for seven traits associated with yield were identified in this research. Validation of QTLs for yield-related traits should provide cost-effective means of transferring traits of interest in breeding programmes to exploit the opportunities offered by the wider wheat gene pool [30,31].
In the studied population of winter wheat accessions, NFT was found to be closely correlated with yield (r = 0.68), as have other studies that determined it as the main trait, suggesting breeding efforts should focus on its increase [32]. The favourable alleles of SNPs ippb_ta_259 (3B), ippb_ta_107 (4A), ippb_ta_261 (4A), ippb_ta_263 (4B), and ippb_ta_229 (6A) had significant effects (R2 = 5–8%) on NFT under drought conditions in 2022 and 2023. The frequency of occurrence of favourable alleles of these loci ranged from 0.656 to 0.990, with the exception of ippb_ta_263 (Table 3).
According to other sources, reliable correlations of yield are revealed with grain weight per spike and number of grains per square metre [33,34]. In this research, thousand kernel weight was determined by markers with small effects, corresponding to the report by Li et al. [35]. In the research by Gizaw et al. [36], eleven stable MTAs for yield on chromosomes 1A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 4B, 5A, 5B, 6A, 6B, and 7B were detected. Guan et al. [37] revealed stable QTLs for yield-related traits on chromosomes 4A and 4B. In this study, four blocks of SNPs associated with yield were revealed on chromosomes 2B, 3B, 4A, and 6A: ippb_ta_149; ippb_ta_289 (2B), ippb_ta_259; ippb_ta_260 (3B); ippb_ta_107, ippb_ta_261 (4A); and ippb_ta_229, ippb_ta_283 (6A). The significant SNP ippb_ta_107 located on chromosome 4A increased the yield by an average of 51 g/m2 over the three years and was simultaneously linked to higher values of NFT and TKW (Table 4).
Of course, based on the experience of previous studies, SNPs can serve as valuable tools for genomics approaches and wheat improvement; however, the number of SNPs needs to be increased to achieve higher coverage of the chromosomes [38,39]. The Axiom Wheat 660K SNP array is reliable and cost-effective for identifying targeted QTLs of yield-related traits and allows for breeders to increase varietal yield in wheat breeding programmes [40,41].
Wheat yield potential depends on many factors, including its polygenic nature, the strong influence of the environment, and the complex relationship among yield component traits. Cao et al. [42] detected 58 QTL-rich clusters (QRC) to identify the major stable loci for wheat yield component traits. Pleiotropic QTLs for yield-related traits were identified using the Wheat 55K SNP Array in a genetic mapping study of 207 wheat recombinant inbred lines [43]. Some studies note that major quantitative agronomic traits of winter wheat are significantly affected by the accumulation of favourable alleles. Consequently, the agronomically favourable alleles identified in breeding programmes can be used to develop wheat cultivars with superior agronomic traits [44,45]. In this connection, SNPs that affected yield-related traits with small phenotypic effects should be accumulated in wheat genotypes to achieve an additive effect. The four loci with pleiotropic effects were identified: ippb_ta_114 located on chromosome 1A was associated with NGS and GWS; ippb_ta_116 (5A)—with GWP and TKW; ippb_ta_239 (5D)—with NFT and GWP; ippb_ta_229 (6A)—with NFT, NGS, and GWS (Table 4). These results were consistent with other reports [46,47]. Overall, these SNPs identified through GWAS analysis are recommended for strongly continental climate conditions to determine genetic sources of high productivity, thereby increasing the efficiency of assessing genetic diversity and breeding value of winter wheat germplasm.
The rare loci were identified within the studied winter wheat population, specifically ippb_ta_149, ippb_ta_239, and ippb_ta_263 (MAF = 0.042–0.106). Carriers of these loci are recommended for inclusion in hybridisation programmes to increase the proportion of favourable alleles: Zhiva, Line K 18918, Line 2293 K 2-4 (Russia); CO13D1299 (USA). The main stable QTLs (p < 0.05) associated with yield-related traits across two growing seasons—ippb_ta_114 (1A, 50.2 cM), ippb_ta_107 (4A, 161.8 cM), ippb_ta_239 (5D, 167.0 cM), and ippb_ta_283 (6A, 56.3 cM)—can be used in MAS (Table 4). The varieties and lines with the highest number of favourable alleles can serve as source material for improving yield-related traits in winter wheat breeding programmes: Zhiva, Zolushka, Doneko, Line 2293 K 2-4 (Russia); KS13DH0030-32 (USA), Gondvana//HBK0935-29-15/KS90W077-2-2/VBF0589-1… (TCI).

5. Conclusions

KASP genotyping combined with phenotypic data revealed that SNP loci associated with the number of fertile tillers per unit area were frequently present within the winter wheat collection and showed a close correlation with yield. SNPs ippb_ta_114 (1A, 50.2 cM), ippb_ta_107 (4A, 161.8 cM), ippb_ta_239 (5D, 167.0 cM), and ippb_ta_283 (6A, 56.3 cM) provided reliable haplotypes for improving wheat yield under the conditions of Western Siberia. Additionally, SNP loci ippb_ta_114 (1A), ippb_ta_116 (5A), ippb_ta_239 (5D), and ippb_ta_229 (6A) exhibited pleiotropic effects on yield and its components. The selected markers can serve as potential targets for MAS, aimed at improving yield and related traits. The high-performing genotypes Zhiva, Zolushka, Doneko, Line K 18918, Line 2293 K 2-4 (Russia); CO13D1299, KS13DH0030-32 (USA), Gondvana//HBK0935-29-15/KS90W077-2-2/VBF0589-1… (TCI) can serve as parental lines in developing high-yielding varieties of winter bread wheat.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/crops5040041/s1, Table S1: Accessions of winter bread wheat international collection; Table S2: List of KASP markers used for genotyping of winter bread wheat international collection (Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, Kazakhstan).

Author Contributions

V.S.: conceived the idea and finalised the manuscript; S.S.: conducted the fieldwork and analysed the data; A.K.: conducted the fieldwork; A.M.: drafted the manuscript; Y.T.: performed KASP analysis and analysed the data; I.P.: analysed the data and reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was carried out with the support of the Russian Science Foundation (agreement No. 23-16-20006 dated 20 April 2023).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained in the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
MASMarker assisted selection
SLSpike length
NFTNo. of fertile tillers per unit area
NGSNo. of grains per spike
GWSGrain weight per spike
GWPGrain weight per plant
TKWThousand kernel weight

References

  1. Caporaso, L.; Paola, F.D.; Bombelli, A.; Vasenev, I.; Nesterova, O.V.; Castaldi, S.; Valentini, R. The expansion of wheat thermal suitability of Russia in response to climate change. Land Use Policy 2018, 78, 70–77. [Google Scholar]
  2. Goncharov, A.A.; Safonov, T.A.; Malko, A.M.; Bocharov, G.A.; Goncharov, S.V. Climate change expected to increase yield of spring cereals and reduce yield of winter cereals in the Western Siberian grain belt. Field Crops Res. 2023, 302, 109038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sharma, S.; Schulthess, A.W.; Bassi, F.M.; Badaeva, E.D.; Neumann, K.; Graner, A.; Özkan, H.; Werner, P.; Knüpffer, H.; Kilian, B. Introducing Beneficial Alleles from Plant Genetic Resources into the Wheat Germplasm. Biology 2021, 10, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Svoboda, P.; Holubec, V.; Reif, J.C.; Berkner, M.O. Curation of historical phenotypic wheat data from the Czech Genebank for research and breeding. Sci. Data 2024, 11, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Eltaher, S.; Hashem, M.; Ahmed, A.A.M.; Baenziger, P.S.; Börner, A.; Sallam, A. Effectiveness of TaDreb-B1 and 1-FEH w3 KASP Markers in Spring and Winter Wheat Populations for Marker-Assisted Selection to Improve Drought Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaur, B.; Mavi, G.S.; Gill, M.S.; Saini, D.K. Utilization of KASP technology for wheat improvement. Cereal Res. Commun. 2020, 48, 409421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shokat, S.; Grobkinsky, D.K.; Singh, S.; Liu, F. The role of genetic diversity and pre-breeding traits to improve drought and heat tolerance of bread wheat at the reproductive stage. Food Energy Secur. 2023, 12, e478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, L.; Wang, R.; Yang, X.; Zhang, A.; Liu, D. Molecular Markers and Their Applications in Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Agriculture 2023, 13, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rasheed, A.; Wen, W.; Gao, F.; Zhai, S.; Jin, H.; Liu, J.; He, Z. Development and validation of KASP assays for genes underpinning key economic traits in bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2016, 129, 1843–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, T.; Deng, G.; Su, Y.; Yang, Z.; Tang, Y.; Wang, J.; Qiu, X.; Pu, X.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; et al. Identification and validation of two major QTLs for spike compactness and length in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) showing pleiotropic effects on yield-related traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2021, 134, 3625–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, J.; Sun, L.; Hu, M.; Liu, Q.; Xu, J.; Mu, L.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, P.; Li, Q.; et al. Pleiotropic Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mining for Regulating Wheat Processing Quality- and Yield-Related Traits. Plants 2024, 13, 2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, L.; Zhao, D.; Meng, Z.; Xu, K.; Yan, J.; Xia, X.; Cao, S.; Tian, Y.; He, Z.; Zhang, Y. QTL mapping for grain yield-related traits in bread wheat via SNP-based selective genotyping. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 857–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kan, C.-C.; Jia, H.; Powers, C.; Carver, B.F.; Yan, L. Genetic characterization and deployment of a major gene for grain yield on chromosome arm 1BS in winter wheat. Mol. Breed. 2020, 40, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shahi, D.; Guo, J.; Babar, M.A.; Pradhan, S.; AVCI, M.; McBreen, J.; Liu, Z.; Bai, G.; Amand, P.S.; Bernardo, A.; et al. Dissecting the genetic basis of fruiting efficiency for genetic enhancement of harvest index, grain number, and yield in wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, D.; Wang, X.; Kumar, U.; Gao, L.; Noor, M.; Imtiaz, M.; Singh, R.P.; Poland, J. High-Throughput Phenotyping Enabled Genetic Dissection of Crop Lodging in Wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Berkner, M.O.; Jiang, Y.; Reif, J.C.; Schulthess, A.W. Trait-customized sampling of core collections from a winter wheat gene bank collection supports association studies. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1451749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lozada, D.N.; Ward, B.P.; Carter, A.H. Gains through selection for grain yield in a winter wheat breeding program. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0221603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, X.; Min, D.; Yasir, T.A.; Hu, Y.-G. Genetic Diversity, Population Structure and Linkage Disequilibrium in Elite Chinese Winter Wheat Investigated with SSR Markers. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e44510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tadesse, W.; Sanchez-Garcia, M.; Assefa, S.G.; Amri, A.; Bishaw, Z.; Ogbonnaya, F.C.; Baum, M. Genetic Gains in Wheat Breeding and Its Role in Feeding the World. Crop Breed. Genet. Genom. 2019, 1, e190005. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shamanin, V.P.; Shepelev, S.S.; Pozherukova, V.E.; Pototskaya, I.V.; Kocherina, N.V.; Lohwasser, U.; Börner, A.; Chesnokov, Y.V. QTL mapping in hexaploid soft wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the West Siberian Plain. Agric. Biol. 2018, 53, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, C.J.; Ladejobi, O.; Mott, R.; Powell, W.; Mackay, I. Analysis of historical selection in winter wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2022, 135, 30053023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Leonova, I.N.; Kiseleva, A.A.; Berezhnaya, A.A.; Stasyuk, A.I.; Likhenko, I.E.; Salina, E.A. Identification of QTLs for Grain Protein Content in Russian Spring Wheat Varieties. Plants 2022, 11, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Morgounov, A.; Li, H.; Shepelev, S.; Ali, M.; Flis, P.; Koksel, H.; Savin, T.; Shamanin, V. GeneticCharacterization of Spring Wheat Germplasm for Macro-, Microelements and Trace Metals. Plants 2022, 11, 2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dorofeev, V.F. (Ed.) Methodical Instructions. Exploring the Wheat Collection; VIR: Leningrad, Russia, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  25. Amalova, A.; Yermekbayev, K.; Griffiths, S.; Abugalieva, S.; Babkenov, A.; Fedorenko, E.; Abugalieva, A.; Turuspekov, Y. Identification of quantitative trait loci of agronomic traits in bread wheat using a Pamyati Azieva × Paragon mapping population harvested in three regions of Kazakhstan. PeerJ 2022, 10, e14324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Genievskaya, Y.; Turuspekov, Y.; Rsaliyev, A.; Abugalieva, S. Genome-wide association mapping for resistance to leaf, stem, and yellow rusts of common wheat under field conditions of South Kazakhstan. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Amalova, A.; Abugalieva, S.; Babkenov, A.; Babkenova, S.; Turuspekov, Y. Genome-wide association study of yield components in spring wheat collection harvested under two water regimes in Northern Kazakhstan. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pototskaya, I.V.; Shepelev, S.S.; Turuspekov, Y.K.; Morgounov, A.I.; Chursin, A.S.; Kovalchuk, A.M.; Savin, T.V.; Shamanin, V.P. Breeding and genetic evaluation of International winter wheat collection under conditions of Western Siberia. Sib. J. Life Sci. Agric. 2024, 6, 313–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Delaporta, S.L.; Wood, J.; Hicks, J.B. A plant DNA minipreparation. Version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1983, 4, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fowler, D.B.; N’Diaye, A.; Laudencia, C.D.; Pozniak, C.J. Quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Phenological Development, Low-Temperature Tolerance, Grain Quality, and Agronomic Characters in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0152185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, S.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Shao, H.; Liu, P.; Hu, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Chang, C.; Lu, J.; et al. Genome-wide association study for grain yield and related traits in elite wheat varieties and advanced lines using SNP markers. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0188662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yang, X.; McMaster, G.S.; Yu, Q. Spatial Patterns of Relationship Between Wheat Yield and Yield Components in China. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2018, 12, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Peltonen-Sainio, P.; Kangas, A.; Salo, J.; Jauhiainen, L. Kernel number is more important than grain weight in determining yield of temperate cereal crops: Evidence from 30 years of multi-location trials. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tsenov, N.; Gubatov, T.; Yanchev, I. Correlations between grain yield and related traits in winter wheat under multi-environmental traits. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2020, 12, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, X.; Xu, X.; Liu, W.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Ru, Z.; Li, L. Dissection of Superior Alleles for Yield-Related Traits and Their Distribution in Important Cultivars of Wheat by Association Mapping. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gizaw, S.A.; Godoy, J.G.V.; Garland-Campbell, K.; Carter, A.H. Genome-Wide Association Study of Yield and Component Traits in Pacific Northwest Winter Wheat. Crop Sci. 2018, 58, 2315–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guan, P.; Lu, L.; Jia, L.; Kabir, M.R.; Zhang, J.; Lan, T.; Zhao, Y.; Xin, M.; Hu, Z.; Yao, Y.; et al. Global QTL Analysis Identifies Genomic Regions on Chromosomes 4A and 4B Harboring Stable Loci for Yield-Related Traits Across Different Environments in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zanke, C.D.; Ling, J.; Plieske, J.; Kollers, S.; Ebmeyer, E.; Korzun, V.; Argillier, O.; Stiewe, G.; Hinze, M.; Neumann, F.; et al. Analysis of main effect QTL for thousand grain weight in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by genome-wide association mapping. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, C.; Zhang, F.; Yan, X.; Zhang, X.; Dong, Z.; Cui, D.; Chen, F. Genome-wide association study for 13 agronomic traits reveals distribution of superior alleles in bread wheat from the Yellow and Huai Valley of China. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 953–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Würschum, T.; Langer, S.M.; Longin, C.F.H.; Korzun, V.; Akhunov, E.; Ebmeyer, E.; Schachschneider, R.; Schacht, J.; Kazman, E.; Reif, J.C. Population structure, genetic diversity and linkage disequilibrium in elite winter wheat assessed with SNP and SSR markers. Theor Appl. Genet. 2013, 126, 1477–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, C.; Dong, Z.; Zhao, L.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, N.; Chen, F. The Wheat 660K SNP array demonstrates great potential for marker-assisted selection in polyploid wheat. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1354–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cao, S.; Xu, D.; Hanif, M.; Xia, X.; He, Z. Genetic architecture underpinning yield component traits in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 1811–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xiong, H.; Li, Y.; Guo, H.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, L.; Gu, J.; Zhao, S.; Ding, Y.; Liu, L. Genetic mapping by integration of 55K SNP array and KASP markers reveals candidate genes for important agronomic traits in hexaploid wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 628478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jung, W.J.; Lee, Y.J.; Kang, C.S.; Seo, Y.W. Identification of genetic loci associated with major agronomic traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based on genome-wide association analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nouraei, S.; Mia, M.S.; Liu, H.; Turner, N.C.; Yan, G. Genome-wide association study of drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) identifies SNP markers and candidate genes. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2024, 299, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lozada, D.N.; Mason, R.E.; Babar, M.A.; Carver, B.F.; Guedira, G.-B.; Merrill, K.; Arguello, M.N.; Acuna, A.; Vieiram, L.; Holder, A.; et al. Association mapping reveals loci associated with multiple traits that affect grain yield and adaptation in soft winter wheat. Euphytica 2017, 213, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, F.; Xu, Y.; Wang, R.; Tong, Y.; Zhang, A.; Liu, D.; An, D. Identification of major QTLs for yield-related traits with improved genetic map in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1138696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Boxplots of the variability of yield and yield-related traits for winter wheat accessions in 2022, 2023, and 2024.
Figure 1. Boxplots of the variability of yield and yield-related traits for winter wheat accessions in 2022, 2023, and 2024.
Crops 05 00041 g001
Table 1. Agronomic performance, heritability, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of international collection genotypes, 2022–2024.
Table 1. Agronomic performance, heritability, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of international collection genotypes, 2022–2024.
Trait202220232024ANOVA
Means *H2 **MeansH2MeansH2G, %E, %
Spike length, cm8.00 ± 0.820.568.30 ± 0.850.599.20 ± 0.540.627228
No. of fertile tillers per m289.8 ± 2.900.58101 ± 4.000.5866.5 ± 1.800.617327
No. of grains per spike, units29.5 ± 3.010.5832.8 ± 3.350.5840.6 ± 2.390.644951
Grain weight per spike, g1.00 ± 0.100.581.20 ± 0.130.561.50 ± 0.870.636139
Grain weight per plant, g1.70 ± 0.120.561.90 ± 0.190.562.40 ± 0.240.668218
Thousand kernel weight, g33.2 ± 3.390.5537.7 ± 3.840.5638.1 ± 2.240.629010
Yield, g/m2173 ± 17.60.56315 ± 32.20.54215 ± 22.20.606832
* Means ± standard error of the means; ** H2—broad-sense heritability; G—genotype, E—environment.
Table 2. Pairwise correlation coefficients (r) between yield and yield-related traits of winter bread wheat accessions tested in Omsk, 2022–2024.
Table 2. Pairwise correlation coefficients (r) between yield and yield-related traits of winter bread wheat accessions tested in Omsk, 2022–2024.
TraitsSLNFTNGSGWSGWPTKWYield
SL1.00
NFT−0.35 ***1.00
NGS0.11 *0.071.00
GWS0.18 **−0.050.67 ***1.00
GWP0.040.040.13 *0.42 ***1.00
TKW0.20 ***−0.06−0.12 *0.41 ***0.65 ***1.00
Yield−0.16 **0.68 ***0.13*0.23 ***0.18 **0.15 **1.00
*, **, and *** correlation coefficients are significant at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
Table 3. List of 13 KASP markers developed based on GWAS analysis, IPBB, Kazakhstan.
Table 3. List of 13 KASP markers developed based on GWAS analysis, IPBB, Kazakhstan.
KASP-IDChr.Position, cMTraitp-ValueMAF
ipbb_ta_1141A50.2No. of fertile tillers8.85 × 10−50.116
ipbb_ta_2741B99.1Vitreousness9.32 × 10−60.031
ipbb_ta_1492B76.8Seed maturation time6.66 × 10−50.063
ipbb_ta_2892B92.0Plant height7.23 × 10−60.389
ipbb_ta_2593B36.4No. of grains per spike5.81 × 10−60.340
ipbb_ta_2603B61.2No. of grains per spike4.62 × 10−60.348
ipbb_ta_2614A40.1Grain protein content6.02 × 10−60.063
ipbb_ta_1074A161.8No. of fertile tillers3.80 × 10−60.021
ipbb_ta_2634B85.3Spike length4.74 × 10−60.042
ipbb_ta_1165A53.5Leaf/Stem rust resistance3.09 × 10−40.365
ipbb_ta_2395D167.0Seed maturation time6.62 × 10−60.106
ipbb_ta_2296A0.88Heading time1.94 × 10−60.010
ipbb_ta_2836A56.3Sedimentation value6.13 × 10−60.281
Table 4. SNP markers with significant association identified in winter wheat accessions, tested in Omsk SAU, 2022–2024.
Table 4. SNP markers with significant association identified in winter wheat accessions, tested in Omsk SAU, 2022–2024.
TraitKASP-IDChr.Allele *Favourable Seasonp-ValueR2, %SNP Effect
SL, cmipbb_ta_1492BC/T20220.0160.64
20230.1820.35
20240.2820.27
ipbb_ta_2614AA/G20220.3520.17
20230.0360.43
20240.2520.22
NFT, per m2ipbb_ta_2593BC/T20220.2434.75
20230.03813.2
20240.5411.95
ipbb_ta_1074AA/G20220.02624.4
20230.29215.3
20240.4715.67
ipbb_ta_2614AA/G20220.4024.80
20230.01821.8
20240.3224.51
ipbb_ta_2634BA/G20220.003823.0
20230.12216.8
20240.8710.96
ipbb_ta_239 **5DA/G20220.0568.32
20230.4514.90
20240.0567.09
ipbb_ta_2296AA/C20220.04527.5
20230.18226.2
20240.4817.47
ipbb_ta_283 **6AC/T20220.0556.71
20230.6412.28
20240.0455.55
NGS, unitsipbb_ta_114 **1AA/G20220.01112.53
20230.0462.52
20240.1741.48
ipbb_ta_2603BA/G20220.0471.82
20230.8710.19
20240.5710.58
ipbb_ta_2296AA/C20220.0456.01
20230.5912.01
20240.6311.56
GWS, gipbb_ta_1141AA/G20220.8810.01
20230.01110.16
20240.4720.04
ipbb_ta_2892BG/T20220.0560.10
20230.3720.05
20240.6410.02
ipbb_ta_2296AA/C20220.1330.26
20230.0440.36
20240.7410.05
GWP, gipbb_ta_1165AC/T20220,4410.17
20230,7210.13
20240.0182.08
ipbb_ta_2395DA/G20220.8110.10
20230.0281.33
20240,6410.23
TKW, gipbb_ta_2892BG/T20220.0381.73
20230.2331.22
20240.1843.14
ipbb_ta_1074AA/G20220.0165.58
20230.2323.02
20240.5313.58
ipbb_ta_1165AC/T20220.7710.26
20230.9510.07
20240.0275.80
Yield, g/m2ipbb_ta_2741BA/G20220.33124.0
20230.035102.7
20240.50120.7
ipbb_ta_2593BC/T20220.4029.98
20230.01958.5
20240.44211.2
ipbb_ta_107 **4AA/G20220.05457.4
20230.27130.7
20240.05465.0
* the favourable allele is highlighted in bold; ** SNPs showing association during two growing seasons.
Table 5. Yield and its components of winter wheat accessions with the maximum number of favourable alleles, 2022–2024.
Table 5. Yield and its components of winter wheat accessions with the maximum number of favourable alleles, 2022–2024.
Variety, LineSL, cmNFT per m2NGS, UnitsGWS, gGWP, gTKW, gYield, g/m2No. of Alleles
Russia
Zhiva9.76 *91.837.7 *1.43 *2.13 *38.5 *384 *7
Donskaya Lira8.10115 *30.9 *1.17 *2.33 *37.9 *367 *7
Donna8.1594.531.0 *1.18 *1.96 *37.9 *351 *8
Zolushka9.02 *119 *34.1 *1.30 *5.01 *37.9 *344 *8
Doneko9.01 *105 *27.61.35 *1.7949.9 *331 *8
Vestnitsa8.63 *121 *36.1 *1.27 *2.23 *34.4317 *9
Line 2293 K 2-48.67 *103 *35.9 *1.38 *1.96 *38.4 *30310
Line K 189187.89139 *40.3 *1.23 *1.96 *30.729712
Bulgaria
Darunok Podilla8.64 *97.538.5 *1.59 *2.54 *40.7 *328 *7
Türkiye
Gelibolu7.39106 *40.3 *1.49 *1.9336.9 *352 *7
USA
CO13D12998.13139 *34.9 *1.26 *3.06 *35.9 *495 *10
KS13DH0030-327.78131 *41.9 *1.44 *2.55 *34.4362 *9
SY Wolf7.28133 *32.8 *1.13 *1.6534.0350 *8
TCI
WBLL1*2/Kuruku/5/Chuenmai 18…7.62115 *34.0 *1.092.02 *31.9389 *8
OCW03S667T-2/KS020986~17.98126 *31.8 *1.16 *1.8836.3 *369 *8
Gondvana//HBK0935-29-15/
KS90W077-2-2
8.61 *98.235.5 *1.38 *2.08 *38.6 *312 *7
Omskaya 4, St8.2896.829.11.061.7732.92888
LCD050.174.650.940.080.171.9016.9
* reliable excess over standard.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shamanin, V.; Shepelev, S.; Kovalchuk, A.; Morgounov, A.; Turuspekov, Y.; Pototskaya, I. SNP Effects on Yield and Agronomic Traits in an International Winter Wheat Collection Grown in Western Siberia. Crops 2025, 5, 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/crops5040041

AMA Style

Shamanin V, Shepelev S, Kovalchuk A, Morgounov A, Turuspekov Y, Pototskaya I. SNP Effects on Yield and Agronomic Traits in an International Winter Wheat Collection Grown in Western Siberia. Crops. 2025; 5(4):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/crops5040041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shamanin, Vladimir, Sergey Shepelev, Alexandr Kovalchuk, Alexey Morgounov, Yerlan Turuspekov, and Inna Pototskaya. 2025. "SNP Effects on Yield and Agronomic Traits in an International Winter Wheat Collection Grown in Western Siberia" Crops 5, no. 4: 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/crops5040041

APA Style

Shamanin, V., Shepelev, S., Kovalchuk, A., Morgounov, A., Turuspekov, Y., & Pototskaya, I. (2025). SNP Effects on Yield and Agronomic Traits in an International Winter Wheat Collection Grown in Western Siberia. Crops, 5(4), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/crops5040041

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop