Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Offshore Mixed Sourcing Strategy: A Case Study of a Japanese Affiliated Apparel Factory in China
Previous Article in Journal
Why Randomized HR Evaluations May Mislead Managers: The Role of Treatment–Trait Interactions in Outcome Construction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Affective Infrastructure: Cultivating Institutional Character in Corporate Practice

by
Terence D. Agbeyegbe
Department of Economics, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA
Businesses 2026, 6(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses6020024
Submission received: 25 March 2026 / Revised: 14 April 2026 / Accepted: 17 April 2026 / Published: 11 May 2026

Abstract

As the strategic debate around corporate purpose intensifies, organizations face a persistent paradox: how to sustain purpose-driven commitments under the continuous pressure of exchange-system efficiency and competing institutional logics. This paper introduces affective infrastructure: the interdependent organizational systems through which firms cultivate and reproduce the emotional and evaluative dimensions of institutional identity. Building on a synthesis of Adam Smith’s moral philosophy and Kenneth Boulding’s integrative systems theory, the paper argues that corporations operate simultaneously as exchange systems and integrative systems and that institutional character emerges from the organizational systems that sustain integrative commitments alongside exchange efficiency. Four infrastructure components are identified (identity alignment systems, integrative human-resource architecture, stakeholder communion practices, and institutional memory mechanisms), and design principles, assessment methods, and organizational illustrations are developed for each. The paper situates the construct within seven adjacent literatures, develops a configurational diagnostic framework comprising six organizational types, and concludes with a structured empirical research agenda that includes proxies for each component. The governing proposition unifying these contributions is this: affective infrastructure explains how organizations sustain integrative capacity under exchange-system pressure as a system—not as a culture to be cultivated, not as a commitment level to be measured, not as a stakeholder orientation to be managed, but as the interdependent organizational architecture through which identity alignment, integrative membership, stakeholder communion, and institutional memory become simultaneously operative and mutually reinforcing. This is what the adjacent constructs, taken individually, cannot explain: no single tradition specifies the generative system through which all four domains become durable together.
Keywords: affective infrastructure; institutional character; organizational identity; corporate purpose; stakeholder theory; dual-system firm; Selznick; dynamic capabilities; decoupling; configurational diagnosis affective infrastructure; institutional character; organizational identity; corporate purpose; stakeholder theory; dual-system firm; Selznick; dynamic capabilities; decoupling; configurational diagnosis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Agbeyegbe, T.D. Affective Infrastructure: Cultivating Institutional Character in Corporate Practice. Businesses 2026, 6, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses6020024

AMA Style

Agbeyegbe TD. Affective Infrastructure: Cultivating Institutional Character in Corporate Practice. Businesses. 2026; 6(2):24. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses6020024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Agbeyegbe, Terence D. 2026. "Affective Infrastructure: Cultivating Institutional Character in Corporate Practice" Businesses 6, no. 2: 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses6020024

APA Style

Agbeyegbe, T. D. (2026). Affective Infrastructure: Cultivating Institutional Character in Corporate Practice. Businesses, 6(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses6020024

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop