Protean and Boundaryless Career Attitudes as Antecedents of Organizational Commitment—Evidence from the Indian IT Industry
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
1.2. Theory and Hypothesis Formation
Protean and Boundaryless Career Attitudes in Relation to Organizational Commitment
2. Methods
2.1. Variables and Data Sources
2.2. Sampling Technique and Sample Classification
2.3. Demographic Data
2.4. Measures
2.5. Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion and Implications
4.1. Business and Managerial Contribution and Implications
4.2. Theoretical Contribution and Implications
4.3. Limitations and Scope for Future Research
5. Conclusions
5.1. Practical Suggestions
5.2. Theoretical Suggestions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Publisher Crown Bunsiness, Currency: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bennis, W.G.; Thomas, R.J. Geeks and Geezers: How Era, Values, and Defining Moments Shape Leaders-How Tough Times Shape Good Leaders; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Carroll, A.B.; Brown, J.A. Corporate Social Responsibility: A review of current concepts, research, and issues. Bus. Soc. 2018, 360, 39–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redondo, R.; Sparrow, P.; Hernández-Lechuga, G. The effect of Protean Careers on talent retention: Examining the relationship between Protean career orientation, organizational commitment, job satisfaction and intention to quit for talented workers. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2019, 32, 2046–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiernik, B.M.; Kostal, J.W. Protean and boundaryless career orientations: A critical review and meta-analysis. J. Couns. Psychol. 2019, 66, 280–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moon, H.; Seo, Y.; Lee, C. The effects of protean career and boundaryless career on workers’ positive career attitude and future learning readiness: Moderating effect of career development support policy. J. Korean Appl. Sci. Technol. 2019, 36, 279–298. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues, R.; Butler, C.L.; Guest, D. Antecedents of protean and boundaryless career orientations: The role of core self-evaluations, perceived employability and social capital. J. Vocat. Behav. 2019, 110, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gubler, M. Protean and Boundaryless Career Orientations—An Empirical Study of IT Professionals in Europe. Ph.D. Thesis, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Okurame, D.E.; Fabunmi, R. Protean and boundaryless careers. Career Dev. Int. 2014, 19, 73–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, D.T.; Mirvis, P.H. The New Career Contract: Developing The whole person at midlife and beyond. J. Vocat. Behav. 1995, 47, 269–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hall, D.T. Protean careers of the 21st century. Acad. Manag. Exec. 1996, 10, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arthur, M.B.; Rousseau, D.M. Introduction: The Boundary Less Career as a New Employment Principle; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Arthur, M.B.; Khapova, S.N.; Wilderom, C.P. Career success in a Boundaryless Career World. J. Organ. Behav. 2005, 26, 177–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.S.; Rasdi, R.M. Protean Career Development: Exploring the individuals, organizational and job-related factors. Asian Soc. Sci. 2014, 10, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lo Presti, A.; Pluviano, S.; Briscoe, J.P. Are freelancers a breed apart? the role of Protean and boundaryless career attitudes in employability and career success. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 2018, 28, 427–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, D.T. Career in Organizations; Scott, Foresman: Gleview, IL, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, D.T. The protean career, a quarter-century journey. J. Vocat. Behav. 2004, 65, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassel, S.H.; Thulemark, M.; Duncan, T. Career paths and mobility in the Swedish hospitality sector. Tour. Geogr. 2017, 20, 29–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirschi, A.; Jaensch, V.K.; Herrmann, A. Protean career orientation, vocational identity, and self-efficacy: An empirical clarification of their relationship. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol. 2016, 26, 208–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, S.E. The changing nature of careers: A review and research agenda. J. Manag. 1999, 25, 457–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, S.E.; Arthur, M.B. The evolution of the boundaryless career concept: Examining physical and psychological mobility. J. Vocat. Behav. 2006, 69, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abessolo, M.; Hirschi, A.; Rossier, J. Work values underlying protean and boundaryless career orientations. Career Dev. Int. 2017, 22, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, S.; Olugu, E.U.; Musa, S.N. Development of Sustainable Manufacturing Performance Evaluation Expert System for small and Medium Enterprises. Procedia CIRP 2016, 40, 608–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jalote, P.; Natarajan, P. The growth and evolution of India’s software industry. Commun. ACM 2019, 62, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pai, N.; Gupta, R.; Lakra, V.; Vella, S.-L.; Kalra, H.; Yadav, T.; Chaturvedi, S.; Gill, N.S. Indian psychiatrists in the Australian workforce—From Brain Drain to Brain Exchange. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2021, 56, 752–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Gupta, A.; Mishra, M.K. Impact of leadership style and happiness on firm performance. In Performance Management; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundi, Y.M.; Hollet-Haudebert, S.; Peterson, J. Linking protean and boundaryless career attitudes to subjective career success: A serial mediation model. J. Career Assess. 2020, 29, 263–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bawa, S.K.; Kaur, P. Impact of Dividend Policy on Shareholder’s Wealth: An EmpiricalAnalysis of Indian Information Technology Sector. Asia-Pac. Financ. Account. Rev. 2013, 1, 17. [Google Scholar]
- NASSCOM. Indian IT-BPO Industry. Archived from the original on 20 December 2012. Witness the transformative power of Technology (no date) NASSCOM. 2012. Available online: https://nasscom.in/ (accessed on 19 January 2023).
- Mathew, M.; Jain, H.C. International Human Resource Management in the Indian Information Technology Sector: A comparison of Indian mncs and affiliates of foreign mncs in India. In The Global Diffusion of Human Resource Practices: Institutional and Cultural Limits; Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley, UK, 2008; pp. 267–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, P.; Duggal, T. Transformational leadership, organizational commitment, Emotional Intelligence and Job Autonomy. Manag. Res. Rev. 2018, 41, 1033–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendonca, J.; Pramanik, A. Digital Attrition: Less Work, More Employees Create Imbalance in IT Industry. The Economic Times. 2018. Available online: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/64023624.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Agrawal, N.M.; Thite, M. Human resource issues, challenges and strategies in the Indian Software Industry. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Dev. Manag. 2003, 3, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitter, S. Here’s Why India’s Silicon Valley Is Losing Its Edge. 2017. Available online: https://mashable.com/2017/04/12/india-silicon-valley-global-startup-ecosystem-ranking/#BJExDDTQWsq3 (accessed on 5 September 2018).
- Kaklasaria, R. Training & HR Challenges in the IT Industry for 2018. ConsultantsReview. 2018. Available online: https://www.consultantsreview.com/ceoinsights/training-hr-challenges-in-the-it-industry-for-2018-vid-877.html (accessed on 5 September 2018).
- Agarwala, T.; Arizkuren-Eleta, A.; Del Castillo, E.; Muñiz-Ferrer, M.; Gartzia, L. Influence of managerial support on work–life conflict and organizational commitment: An international comparison for India, Peru and Spain. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2014, 25, 1460–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raina, R.; Roebuck, D.B. Exploring Cultural Influence on Managerial Communication in Relationship to Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and the Employees Propensity to Leave in the Insurance Sector of India. Int. J. Bus. Commun. 2014, 53, 97–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhar, R.L. Service quality and the training of employees: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Tour. Manag. 2015, 46, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jena, L.K.; Bhattacharya, P.; Pradhan, S. Employee Engagement and Affective Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Employee Voice among Indian Service Sector Employees’. Vis. J. Bus. Perspect. 2017, 21, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sullivan, S.E.; Baruch, Y. Advances in career theory and research: A critical review and agenda for future exploration. J. Manag. 2009, 35, 1542–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chui, H.; Li, H.; Ngo, H.Y. Linking Protean Career Orientation with Career Optimism: Career Adaptability and Career Decision Self-Efficacy as Mediators. J. Career Dev. 2020, 49, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstetter, H.; Rosenblatt, Z. Predicting protean and physical boundaryless career attitudes by work importance and work alternatives: Regulatory focus mediation effects. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2016, 28, 2136–2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, J.; Allen, N.J. A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 1991, 1, 61–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, D.T. Careers in and out of Organizations, Foundations for Organizational Science. Sage Publications Inc.: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- De Vos, A.; Soens, N. Protean attitude and career success: The mediating role of self-management. J. Vocat. Behav. 2008, 73, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briscoe, J.P.; Hall, D.T. The interplay of boundaryless and Protean Careers: Combinations and implications. J. Vocat. Behav. 2006, 69, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, N.J.; Meyer, J.P. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J. Occup. Psychol. 1990, 63, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enache, M.; Sallan, J.M.; Simo, P.; Fernandez, V. Organizational commitment within a contemporary career context. Int. J. Manpow. 2013, 34, 880–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Briscoe, J.P.; Finkelstein, L.M. The “New Career” and organizational commitment. Career Dev. Int. 2009, 14, 242–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, J.P.; Allen, N.J.; Smith, C.A. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J. Appl. Psychol. 1993, 78, 538–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robbins, S.P.; Judge, T.A. Organization Behaviour; Molan, B., Translator; Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Glaveli, N.; Grigoroudis, E.; Manolitzas, P. Practical application of MSQ and MUSA methodology in determining critical job satisfaction factors of seasonal employees in summer destination luxury resorts. Tour. Manag. 2019, 74, 426–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bambacas, M. Organizational handling of careers influences managers’ organizational commitment. J. Manag. Dev. 2010, 29, 807–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, J.P.; Herscovitch, L. Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2001, 11, 299–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uçanok, B.; Karabatı, S. The effects of values, work centrality, and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behaviors: Evidence from Turkish smes. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 2013, 24, 89–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enache, M.; Sallan, J.M.; Simo, P.; Fernandez, V. Career attitudes and subjective career success: Tackling gender differences. Gend. Manag. Int. J. 2011, 26, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rosseel, Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 2012, 48, 1–36. Available online: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/ (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Epskamp, S.; Stuber, S. SemPlot: Path Diagrams and Visual Analysis of Various SEM Packages Output. R Package Version 1.1. 2017. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Hair, J.F.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Gudergan, S.P. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Falissard, B. Psy: Various Procedures Used in Psychometry R Package Version 1.1. 2012. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psy (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- Oh, S.Y.; Koo, S. Protean career attitude and organisational commitment in learning organisation climate. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2021, 42, 837–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lochab, A.; Kumar, S. Dilemma to decision: Human resource analytics for organizational performance-an empirical analysis. Asian J. Multidimens. Res. 2020, 9, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lochab, A.; Kumar, S.; Devi, B. Ethical Climate as a Moderator in the Relationship between Protean Career Orientation and Organizational Commitment-Evidences from India. South Asian J. Manag. 2021, 28, 7–29. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P.; Kumar, S.; Lochab, A. Impact of Individual Personality Traits on Organizational Commitment of IT Professionals in India: The Moderating Role of Protean Career. South Asian J. Manag. 2022, 29, 80–105. [Google Scholar]
- Alonderienė, R.; Šimkevičiūtė, I. Linking protean and boundaryless career with organizational commitment: The case of young adults in finance sector. Baltic Journal of Management 2018, 13, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apergis, N. Unemployment and organizational Commitment: Evidence from a panel of Australian Manufacturing Firms. Rev. Econ. Anal. 2016, 8, 135–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Cuyper, N.; De Witte, H. The management paradox: Self-rated employability and organizational commitment and performance. Pers. Rev. 2011, 40, 152–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McAdam, M.; McAdam, R. High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources. Technovation 2008, 28, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Demographic | Category | Frequency | Percent |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 292 | 48.7 |
Female | 308 | 51.3 | |
Age | Below 25 Years | 156 | 26.0 |
25–35 Years | 171 | 28.5 | |
35–45 Years | 201 | 33.5 | |
Above 45 Years | 72 | 12.0 | |
Marital Status | Married | 349 | 58.2 |
Unmarried | 251 | 41.8 | |
Income | Up to five Lacs | 232 | 38.7 |
Up to seven Lacs | 148 | 24.7 | |
7 Lacs and above | 220 | 36.7 | |
Educational Qualification | Graduation | 469 | 78.2 |
Post-Graduation | 131 | 21.8 |
Constructs | Items | CFA Loadings * |
---|---|---|
Self-Directed [46] | SD1 | 0.758 |
SD2 | 0.835 | |
SD3 | 0.797 | |
SD4 | 0.853 | |
SD5 | 0.856 | |
SD6 | 0.809 | |
SD7 | 0.793 | |
SD8 | 0.756 | |
Value Driven [46] | VD1 | 0.808 |
VD2 | 0.824 | |
VD3 | 0.849 | |
VD4 | 0.836 | |
VD5 | 0.801 | |
VD6 | 0.694 | |
Boundaryless Mobility [46] | BM1 | 0.695 |
BM2 | 0.706 | |
BM3 | 0.725 | |
BM4 | 0.816 | |
BM5 | 0.848 | |
BM6 | 0.843 | |
BM7 | 0.777 | |
BM8 | 0.77 | |
Mobility Preference [46] | MP1 | 0.722 |
MP2 | 0.802 | |
MP3 | 0.788 | |
MP4 | 0.675 | |
MP5 | 0.743 | |
Affective Commitment [47] | OC1 | 0.649 |
OC2 | 0.629 | |
OC3 | 0.601 | |
OC4 | 0.611 | |
Normative Commitment [47] | OC5 | 0.581 |
OC6 | 0.514 | |
OC7 | 0.561 | |
OC8 | 0.589 | |
Continuance Commitment [47] | OC9 | 0.601 |
OC10 | 0.551 | |
OC11 | 0.507 | |
OC12 | 0.554 | |
OC13 | 0.521 |
Fit Index | Value |
---|---|
CMIN/DF | 1.962 |
CFI | 0.949 |
RMSEA | 0.040 |
PCLOSE | 0.995 |
NC | SD | VD | MP | BM | AC | CC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC | 0.809 | ||||||
SD | 0.096 | 0.808 | |||||
VD | 0.049 | 0.406 | 0.804 | ||||
MP | 0.021 | 0.192 | 0.206 | 0.747 | |||
BM | 0.085 | 0.419 | 0.274 | 0.198 | 0.775 | ||
AC | 0.770 | 0.042 | 0.022 | 0.021 | 0.016 | 0.825 | |
CC | 0.884 | 0.009 | 0.040 | 0.129 | 0.017 | 0.680 | 0.601 |
Constructs | Mean | SD | α Reliability | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Self-Directed | 4.33 | 0.808 | 0.938 | 0.653 | 0.937 |
Value Driven | 4.28 | 0.863 | 0.915 | 0.646 | 0.916 |
BM | 4.37 | 0.721 | 0.926 | 0.600 | 0.923 |
Mobility preference | 4.01 | 1.085 | 0.857 | 0.558 | 0.863 |
Affective Commitment | 4.41 | 0.657 | 0.795 | 0.593 | 0.795 |
Normative Commitment | 4.35 | 0.583 | 0.744 | 0.589 | 0.760 |
Continuance Commitment | 4.44 | 0.551 | 0.682 | 0.561 | 0.790 |
N = 600 |
Path | Estimate | Std. Estimate | SE | Z | Sig. of Z | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SD | → | AC | 0.033 | 0.043 | 0.043 | 0.766 | 0.444 |
VD | → | AC | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.035 | 0.207 | 0.836 |
BM | → | AC | −0.001 | −0.001 | 0.042 | −0.024 | 0.981 |
MP | → | AC | −0.022 | −0.032 | 0.036 | −0.622 | 0.534 |
SD | → | NC | 0.046 | 0.070 | 0.037 | 1.223 | 0.221 |
VD | → | NC | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.031 | 0.128 | 0.898 |
BM | → | NC | 0.032 | 0.049 | 0.036 | 0.890 | 0.373 |
MP | → | NC | −0.002 | −0.004 | 0.031 | −0.072 | 0.943 |
SD | → | CC | −0.013 | −0.026 | 0.031 | −0.431 | 0.666 |
VD | → | CC | 0.011 | 0.024 | 0.025 | 0.419 | 0.675 |
BM | → | CC | −0.001 | −0.001 | 0.030 | −0.019 | 0.985 |
MP | → | CC | 0.060 | 0.129 | 0.026 | 2.346 | 0.019 |
Fit Index | Value |
---|---|
CMIN/DF | 2.75 |
CFI | 0.934 |
RMSEA | 0.045 |
PCLOSE | 0.995 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kumar, S.; Bagherian, A.; Lochab, A.; Khan, A. Protean and Boundaryless Career Attitudes as Antecedents of Organizational Commitment—Evidence from the Indian IT Industry. Businesses 2023, 3, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses3010007
Kumar S, Bagherian A, Lochab A, Khan A. Protean and Boundaryless Career Attitudes as Antecedents of Organizational Commitment—Evidence from the Indian IT Industry. Businesses. 2023; 3(1):83-97. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses3010007
Chicago/Turabian StyleKumar, Sunil, Anthony Bagherian, Anshu Lochab, and Adil Khan. 2023. "Protean and Boundaryless Career Attitudes as Antecedents of Organizational Commitment—Evidence from the Indian IT Industry" Businesses 3, no. 1: 83-97. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses3010007
APA StyleKumar, S., Bagherian, A., Lochab, A., & Khan, A. (2023). Protean and Boundaryless Career Attitudes as Antecedents of Organizational Commitment—Evidence from the Indian IT Industry. Businesses, 3(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.3390/businesses3010007